Mr. Confidential: The Man, the Magazine & the Movieland Massacre

I interview Samuel Bernstein Monday morning.

His first book was 1994’s Uncommon Heroes, 130 profiles of extraordinary gays.

His latest book is Mr. Confidential: The Man, the Magazine & the Movieland Massacre (website).

It has received only positive reviews, including this one from Publishers Weekly:

“Bernstein’s hard-boiled yet juicy chronicle of publisher Robert Harrison’s 1950s celebrity gossip magazine Confidential is an apt, unflinching take on the wildly popular tabloid that stood by its slogan, ‘Tells the Facts and Names the Names.’ In its heyday, the rag was revealing romantic trysts, outing gay stars and insinuating a lot more for an audience of over 5 million readers. That wouldn’t last, as "The Trial of 100 Stars, then 200 stars" in 1957 brought multiple felonies against the tabloid – including conspiracy to commit libel and disseminate obscene material – that would lead to circulation-killing content and format changes. Focusing on the embattled founder and two key Confidential players – Harrison’s niece and research director Marjorie Meade, ‘the most feared woman in Hollywood,’ and editor Howard Rushmore, a ‘goofball-popping, alcoholic, violent, Communist witch-hunter’ – and including a huge cast of celebrities, Bernstein does a commendable job bringing Harrison and his times to life with a page-turning pace and prose worthy of the tabloid (somewhat appropriately, his frequent italicized asides could have used more consistent attribution). Including more than 75 pages of photos and reproductions of the magazine’s stories and covers, this smart exposé should please anyone interested in 1950s Hollywood or the evolution of celebrity journalism.”

Luke (audio): "Why did you write this book?"

Sam: "I read an article in Vanity Fair about the trial in 1957 that effectively ended the magazine. I realized that I knew the central figure who had been on trial — Beverly Hills society matron Marjorie Roth who was Marjorie Meade, the notorious flame-haired femme fatale who newspapers were calling the most feared woman in Hollywood and the Duchess of Dirt.

"That gave me an entre into the story. I’ve always been fascinated by 1950s Hollywood."

Luke: "You take a different approach to this topic."

Sam: "Over the years, there’s been a dark view of the magazine, partially through James Ellroy who was really writing about police corruption. That coupled with the suicide of a main figure, Howard Rushmore (he killed his wife and then himself), it left a sinister aura to the era and to the magazine. When I started in on the project, I thought I was going to go right with that. What I discovered was this champagne silliness. By the standards of the day, most of what was written in Hollywood Confidential was funny and benign. I’m not sure that insinuating Frank Sinatra’s terrific capabilities in bed boil down to his eating Wheaties is hurtful. It’s win win.

"I discovered that many of the stars were participating in the articles about them for publicity. Some of the freelancers were up to no good but the people in charge of the magazine were this tightknit happy Jewish family. As much as the publisher loved these wild publicity stunts where he was supposedly shot in the Dominican Republican and a gangster hung him out a window by his feet, telling him not to run a story…

"There were stars who did not like what was written about them but I did not find careers destroyed. Outing Van Johnson seemed to have no effect on his career. I don’t find murders and suicides.

"While a lot of the language was insensitive, and certainly some of it was snide, but they were fairer than people imagine. It was wink, wink, nudge, nudge, boys will be boys, what the hell.

"Publisher Robert Harrison had no particular agenda. He was not out to demonize anyone.

"They liked their status as rich, popular celebrities.

"The family had no editorial approval of what I wrote and wound upset at some of what I wrote. I find that hard to understand because what I wrote paints them positively."

Luke: "What good came of Hollywood Confidential?"

Sam: "In writing about so many societal issues that were taboo, and making fun of them, it demystified miscegenation, homosexuality, etc. This was a process below the radar and unintentional. Laughing about things is the first step to not being frightened of them.

"Certainly many of the tabloids that arose out of Confidential were just nasty."

"I have an upcoming media juggernaut – blog – book called, ‘Kill Your Inner Child.’ It’s based on my bizarre upbringing. When you tell a story about something that happened to you in childhood and your shrink looks at you and says, ‘Really?’ you know you’ve got something to write about.

"As a six-year old Jewish boy living in Cairo, I didn’t know where my mother was. My father may have been selling arms to the Palestinians. I was busy at six having my first sexual experience with a Muslim male, which I initiated.

"I think I ought to be able to get a book deal. I’m working with Hearst Entertainment. We’ve shot ten episodes of different pieces of the story with actors playing my siblings and parents.

"My siblings are not thrilled with it."

Bernstein has primarily earned his living from writing for TV and movies. "I started out my career as an actor. I toured with Evita. I used to sing everywhere. I realized I wasn’t going to become as successful as I hoped. And I didn’t particularly enjoy it.

"Writing uses all that’s going on in my head."

"If I was going to decide by the financial merits, I would’ve gone into my grandfather’s cheese business."

Luke: "What do you love and hate about your life today?"

Sam: "I love my home life. My partner and I have been together 13 years. There’s not enough money and I wish I were 20 pounds lighter."

Luke: "Who are the worthy successors to Confidential magazine?"

Sam: "Vanity Fair. I don’t feel like the gossip rags have the wit. They’re not fun."

Luke: "When is gossip good and when is gossip bad?"

Sam: "It’s bad when it is directed at people who can’t fight back. I’m disturbed when people say snide things about the children of celebrities.

"When people really are private, you should respect that. There are a lot of people in Hollywood who use their families and use their private lives to promote themselves. And then they bitch about people going into their private lives. If you’ve put your private life on parade, then you’ve made a decision and your private life is fair game. But if you’re like Jodie Foster… She’s a private person. I don’t think it is necessary [to go after her]. She’s a real actor.

"But it is a divide that constantly changes. It’s human nature that we like to gossip."

Luke: "Do you think the mayor’s marital problems are legitimate?"

Sam: "Yes. He made his family the center of his campaign as politicians do. It is serious that he was having an affair with somebody who was covering him."

Posted in Author Interviews, Book Reviews, Hollywood | Comments Off on Mr. Confidential: The Man, the Magazine & the Movieland Massacre

Europeans heighten threat levels

From Reuters:

The English are feeling the pinch in relation to recent terrorist threats and have raised their security level from “Miffed” to “Peeved.” Soon, though, security levels may be raised yet again to “Irritated” or even “A Bit Cross.” Londoners have not been “A Bit Cross” since the blitz began in 1940 and tea supplies all but ran out. Terrorists have been re-categorized from “Tiresome” to “A Bloody Nuisance.”

The last time the British issued “A Bloody Nuisance” warning level was during the great fire of 1666.

Also, the French government announced yesterday that it has raised its terror alert level from “Run” to “Hide.” The only two higher levels in France are “Collaborate” and “Surrender.” The rise was precipitated by a recent fire that destroyed France’s white flag factory, effectively paralyzing the country’s military capability.

It’s not only the English and French who are on a heightened level of alert.

Italy has increased the alert level from “Shout Loudly and Excitedly” to “Elaborate Military Posturing.” Two more levels remain: “Ineffective Combat Operations” and “Change Sides.”

The Germans also increased their alert state from “Disdainful Arrogance” to “Dress in Uniform and Sing Marching Songs.” They also have two higher levels: “Invade a Neighbor” and “Lose.”

Belgians, on the other hand, are all on holiday as usual, and the only threat they are worried about is NATO pulling out of Brussels.

The Spanish are all excited to see their new submarines ready to deploy. These beautifully designed subs have glass bottoms so the new Spanish navy can get a really good look at the old Spanish navy.

Posted in Satire, Terror | Comments Off on Europeans heighten threat levels

Orthodox Yeshiva Claims ‘Philosophy Of Inclusiveness’

Allan Nadler writes in the Forward: "In addition to Feldman, one is reminded of, say, journalist Andrew Sullivan’s sad mewing about the Catholic Church’s rejection of his choice to live, and advocate for, an openly gay life. Closer to home, there are also the good folks at a new rabbinical school in Manhattan that proudly promotes its “open” alternative to mainstream Modern Orthodoxy, choosing at its benefit dinners publicly to vilify the latter’s flagship institution, Yeshiva University, only to then complain bitterly that the Orthodox Rabbinical Council of America refuses to recognize the credentials of its graduates."

Yaakov posts: "It would have made more sense for Dr. Nadler to point to the publicizing in a YCT journal of Rabbi Orlow’s remarks about his gay haggadah or to point to the fact that many YCT students daven at minyanim where women are called to the Torah. Whether gay haggadot or mixed keriah minyanim are right or wrong is not the issue. The issue is whether a yeshiva that endorses or, at the very least, tolerates such activities could expect the RCA to accept its graduates. Nonetheless, I think we would all agree that writing a gay haggadah, giving a woman an aliya, having a spouse who wears a talit (as do some YCT students), and even davening at a fully egalitarian minyan (as do one or two YCT students and graduates) is very different than intermarrying."

Anon responds: "Rabbi Orlow did not write the haggadah. It was not "his" gay haggadah (I bet his wife and kids would be pretty shocked if it was!) As the Hillel rabbi at Washington U. he assisted students in creating something that they wanted to do, and as the rabbi he helped them explore Jewish texts that were relevant to them. If this is a problem for people, that’s fine. But it is outright slander to say that he "wrote a gay haggadah.""

Posted in Orthodoxy, Yeshiva | Comments Off on Orthodox Yeshiva Claims ‘Philosophy Of Inclusiveness’

OU: Sack Feldman now that he’s admitted photo wasn’t doctored

From the JTA:

The Orthodox Union called on the New York Times Magazine to sack contributing editor Noah Feldman after he admitted that he and his Korean-American girlfriend may not have been cropped from a photo taken at his Orthodox school reunion.

Feldman sparked an avalanche of response with his essay in the July 22 edition of the New York Times Magazine, in which he used the example of the cropped photo as the launching point for a pointed critique of the contradictions he see in Modern Orthodoxy.

The New York Jewish Week reported this week that in fact a number of photographs were taken at the reunion and the one in which Feldman and his girlfriend, now wife, were pictured had a large number of people in the frame, a number of whom likely were eliminated from the final shot. According to the photographer who took the pictures, Feldman and editors at the magazine became aware of the situtation shortly before publication.

While Feldman acknowledged in the Jewish Week interview that the crop may not have been an intentional slight on the part of his alma mater, the Maimonides School in Brookline, Mass., he nonetheless stood by the broader thrust of his essay.

Posted in Noah Feldman | Comments Off on OU: Sack Feldman now that he’s admitted photo wasn’t doctored

L.A.’s Orthodox Day Schools

Over 100 Jewish kids in the San Fernando Valley go to the right-wing Toras Emes (Yeshiva Rav Isacsohn Torath Emeth) in Beverly La Brea:

….includes 1,100 students in preschool to eighth grade, 240 staff members, five different buildings in the Beverly La Brea area and an annual budget of $6 million.

Over the past 50 years, the school’s growth has been synchronous with the expansion of the ultra-Orthodox community in Los Angeles as a whole. In the 1950s, there was only a handful of synagogues that served the ultra-Orthodox community, and even fewer schools. Today, the ultra-Orthodox community has dozens of synagogues, several kollels and other community infrastructure.

That’s about 90-minutes in the car every day. There’s a need in the Valley for a right-wing academy. Emek Hebrew Academy-Teichman Family Torah Center in Sherman Oaks is centrist. It’s a victim of its own success. It’s big. Parents who wouldn’t otherwise send their kids to a Jewish day school do, including a lot of secular Israelis. Children of Orthodox parents will go over to another home and drive on Shabbos.

"Harkham Hillel has the worst reputation," says one parent. "Parents who send their kids to Maimonides wouldn’t send their kid to Hillel if it was a way of avoiding the Holocaust. I don’t know what happened but people are getting the hell out of there. They let it go to the Persians. If you go to their house, their mother is wearing the hot pants and the cleavage. So many people in Beverlywood (near Hillel) send their kids across town to Maimonides. Emek, there’s probably too many Israelis who aren’t Orthodox enough."

Shalhevet is a bastion for the white Jews who want to avoid their duskier co-religionists.

"Maimonides has a teaching program that all the parents rave about."

"All the growth is to the right."

Posted in Education, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on L.A.’s Orthodox Day Schools

What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You

Ziona Greenwald writes:

The worst kind of tragedy is an avoidable one. The world of shidduchim is full of such avoidable tragedies–heartache and heartbreak attributable to the actions (and inactions) of misguided human beings.

In last week’s Jewish Press, a mother wrote in to Rebbetzin Jungreis asking whether her son’s bipolar disorder must be revealed to the girl he is seriously dating. Her husband says no. The mother is less sure. The boy’s condition is currently well-controlled by medication, and he’s happier than he’s ever been, so let’s leave well enough alone, his father says. After all, if the girl and her family find out, she might end the relationship. The mother doesn’t want to upset the apple cart either, but she’s uncomfortable about not informing the young woman.

Is anyone else horrified by this so-called dilemma? I shudder to think that these parents are actually considering letting their clinically ill son enter into marriage on false pretenses.

Posted in Matchmaking | Comments Off on What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You

Israel’s Great Rabbis?

Elliot Resnick writes:

Israeli "gedolim" are really a curious lot. They take stands on the most peculiar issues and remain silent on issues that seem to demand an outcry.

Sparking the above observation is the ban — signed by Rav Elyashiv, Rabbi Aharon Leib Shteinman, Rabbi Chaim Pinchas Sheinberg, the Gerrer and Belzer Rebbes and more — of an Avram Fried/Shwekey concert in Jerusalem.

At first I thought that the laws against playing live music in Jerusalem (a long-debated topic in Jewish law) sparked this ban. Instead it turns out that the rabbis are concerned with the intermingling of men and women (although curiously, the rabbis oppose the concert even if the men and women are seated separately, which apparently they are).

Now obviously immodesty is an important and relevant issue, which perhaps calls for the rabbis’ intervention (although in my experience, this concern is not really existent at concerts with separate sitting). However, is a ban really called for? A ban is a serious matter. Why take such a harsh approach?

A harsh approach might be called for when gays from around the world march in Jerusalem, spitting God in the face in one of the worst ways imaginable. Yet, when that matter came up this summer and last summer, most of these rabbis turned mute.

Posted in Israel, Orthodoxy, Rabbis | Comments Off on Israel’s Great Rabbis?

Sometimes You Are What You Wear: An Argument for Tzniut By Dr. Eliyahu Safran

Stephen Steiner writes:

Profoundly distressed by what he sees as a breakdown in the morals of a sex-drenched society in which women’s dress – or lack of same – emphasizes bare skin over modesty, a leading Orthodox Union rabbi has written a searing and insightful book calling for a return to the values that have been emphasized for centuries in Jewish life.

The rabbi takes the position that the modern world has turned children into “commodities” that serve to benefit a corporate bottom line but not the children themselves. He declares that the superficiality of the modern world, with its emphasis on body image, has done a profound disservice to our youth, with the result being illicit behaviors, alcohol and drug abuse, and eating disorders among other psychological struggles.

Tzniut, on the other hand, teaches the reader not simply to “look,” but to “see with meaning.” It teaches how to focus upon some aspect of Creation and not to see just its outer, most superficial quality, but instead its inner, more meaningful aspects. Discussing the concepts of “outside” and “inside,” Safran maintains that physical appearance should be designed to call attention to one’s worth and nobility, to a good soul. “Beauty diminishes but a good name endures,” he writes, quoting Jewish writings. Tzniut is the way to achieve an enduring good name.

Says Rabbi Steven Burg, international director of the OU’s youth program, “It is understood for young men and women alike in our programs that the way you dress can help to increase a person’s self-esteem. Rabbi Safran’s book should be must reading in all homes in which a teen lives, both for the young person and for parents, to reinforce the values that lead to proper dress and an increased positive self-image.”

Posted in Modesty | Comments Off on Sometimes You Are What You Wear: An Argument for Tzniut By Dr. Eliyahu Safran

Feldman’s Complaint

From The Jewish Press editorial:

Mr. Feldman’s presumption is breathtaking. He offers dubious instant analyses of Jewish law and history in support of what seems to be his underlying premise that normative Judaism is far more an uncertain and elusive concept than most believe – which is contrary to the teachings over many centuries of highly regarded rabbinic scholars far brighter and more erudite than he.

And he has plainly mischaracterized what Modern Orthodoxy is all about. It is not, as he suggests, an always available contrivance to enable one to push to the side what others consider to be the requirements of Jewish law when they get in the way of some “modern” course of action or other. Nor is it haphazard or the stuff of individual ad hoc decision-making.

Rather, Modern Orthodoxy is predicated on serious intellectual rigor that leads to certain conclusions. Just as their ultra-Orthodox co-religionists, the Modern Orthodox are enjoined to act in accordance with what God wants of them, determined through time-honored methods of discerning the Divine will. Their primary focus must be on the requirements of Jewish law – not what will make for an easier fit with modernity.

Posted in Noah Feldman, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Feldman’s Complaint

Feldman Article Raises Questions Of Journalistic Standards

Ralph Lieberman writes:

Initially, Professor Noah Feldman’s “Orthodox Paradox,” an article appearing in the July 22 issue of The New York Times Magazine, may seem entertaining. But on further reading, a very disturbing message emerges – a message that calls into serious question the intent of the author and the judgment of The New York Times in publishing the piece.

If you remove the personal interest story and the extensive background, the thesis of the essay is quite damning: Feldman argues that the Modern Orthodox community has drawn inappropriate and even dangerous lines in matters of life and love:

… My Modern Orthodox synagogue is filled every Shabbat with doctors, and I routinely hear their beepers go off for patients who are, in most cases, non-Jews.

Feldman knows very well that not even the teacher he cites would even think a physician should deny treatment to non-Jews. It is, however, entirely natural in the halachic process to explore the underlying rationale, to debate these fine issues of law even when we know – on the basis of secular law, morals and religious obligations – that a Modern Orthodox physician must treat all patients in need – on Shabbat or even on Yom Kippur.

Posted in Journalism, Noah Feldman | Comments Off on Feldman Article Raises Questions Of Journalistic Standards