I Need Your Help

Dear reader,

In my long prestigious career as a single man, I’ve had a lot of dates and I’ve had a lot of women.

My problem is that I have gone on no more than half of scheduled first dates. Why? Because half the time I make a date with a woman, she either does not show (happened to me about a dozen times), or she cancels (and sometimes attempts to reschedule).

This morning, I woke up to the following email: "After we spoke yesterday I checked messages and email only to realize that I spoke too soon about meeting for dinner this evening. I have several additional job interviews b4 weeks end and need to stay focused.  With that said, a rain check and perhaps coffee early next week? Let me know your availability and have a great weekend."

I can’t remember ever trying to reschedule a first date. It’s probably happened but I can’t think of when I initiated this. So am I correct in intuiting that 99% of the time when women try to reschedule a first date (even when it’s a first date that they initiated), they are playing some game? I understand that sometimes things do come up and get in the way, but because this rescheduling happens to me so often (on my first attempts at dating, at age 14, the girl, Denise Bernard, twice in a row had to go to a horse show, by the third time she was so worn down that she went to the San Francisco Giants game with me and my friends and had a lousy time), I believe I have stumbled on to a great insight into human nature.

Incidentally, this happened to me just as often before Google, so I don’t think this is primarily a matter of their reading my body of work and becoming horrified.

Khunrum emails: "Luke, perhaps you could give us some insight into a Luke Ford "DATE"…I imagine such an outing to be extremely underfunded. Like a glass of water and a small dinner salad. You don’t pick them up in the van do you? You meet them at a restaurant right? Denny’s….I-Hop? ….and The Hovel…when do you spring The Hovel on them? I’m sure if they had a choice they’d prefer an evening at the Bates Motel. I’d love you to give us the misha goss on a typical Luke Ford date…The ones they don’t cancel out on."

Luckily, I have an expert on women who I can turn to in these times of trouble — David "The Mac" Klinghoffer.

He pimps for the Washington Post on March 28, 1993:

As my unmarried male friends and I have discovered in the course of trying to get dates, there is something archetypal going on in the minds of women, ages 23 to 30, living in major American cities. Emily Post, meet Dr. Jung.

 Never mind all the talk about feminism; we men in our twenties are expected to ask women out on dates, and definitely not the other way around. Stranger than that is this: When a man proposes a first date, he is never, but never, turned down on the spot. Instead, for the woman who doesn’t want to go out with a particular man, it has become the prescribed social form to accept his offer anyway. The woman then waits until the day of the date, calls the man at his workplace between five hours and 15 minutes prior to the appointed time and cancels.

 This is an unremarked-on development in mating rituals and should probably be left to academic sociologists for proper digestion and analysis. What interests me are the excuses women inevitably offer when breaking that first or second date. A woman never says, "I’ve thought it over and decided I’d rather sit at home and bleach my mustache." She never says – plausible as it may be – "It has only now dawned on me that you are a world-class geek." What she does say, I’ve found, can be classified into three major patterns. Discounting the possibility that leading colleges issue a secret primer to graduating women – "How to Avoid Unwanted Dates Without Ever Having to Say No" – these patterns are most likely subliminal in origin and repeated over and over again: They are, in a word, archetypes.

"You’ll never believe who just dropped in . . . ."

 There is, above all, the pattern of the Unexpected Guest. My friend Henry, a headhunter for corporate lawyers in New York, tells of the 30-year-old real estate lawyer who called an hour before the two of them were to get together for dinner. Her father had decided to make a surprise visit from Pittsburgh.

Brian emails:

My problem has been that they show up and I wish I’d stayed home.

 

I think your problem is that you really haven’t generated any excitement on the part of the woman in meeting you. You really have to make them feel as though the first date is going to be the last first date they’ll ever be on for them to even show up.

You need to spend more time priming them and showing them that meeting you will be so much fun they won’t want to be anywhere else. If you don’t do that–forgettaboutit as they say on TV.

He has to understand, women have the goodies, women control the goodies, men want those goodies, you have to make it worth their while to let you have access to their goodies.

And being a nice guy won’t get you anywhere.

Posted in Dating | Comments Off on I Need Your Help

Is Matt Drudge America’s Most Important Journalist?

I can’t think of anyone who comes close. Drudge breaks more stories than anybody and has more influence on the news cycle.

It does not matter that much that he may be a bad journalist. The merit of his work outweighs his failures to abide by journalistic protocol.

Posted in Blogging, Journalism | Comments Off on Is Matt Drudge America’s Most Important Journalist?

Shalhevet At The Crossroads

Shalhevet is the Jewish school of the future and always will be.

Billionaire Ameriquest founder Roland Arnall has been Shalhevet’s major funder for the past five years (to the tune of about $6 million).

He first stepped in when Shalhevet had a major federal tax shortfall. He then did a series of matching donations.

Or at least that’s how they were spun.

I believe that the term "loans" might be more accurate.

Roland wants to wean Shalhevet off his money.

Don’t we all?

Founder and school head Jerry Friedman claims he’s given the school millions of dollars. The board searched for the notes to verify the gifts and couldn’t find them. So, what the hell, they resolved the issue by saying Friedman had given $1.1 million to the school and a document was created to that effect.

I believe that this money is also technically a loan.

Friedman’s money has priority below that of the bank and below Roland’s if the school tanks.

The understanding is that neither Jerry nor Roland will call in their notes unless Shalhevet goes under.

Jerry has often said he wants his $1.1 million back.

Shalhevet’s property has been appraised for nearly $20 million.

Friedman hasn’t given any serious money in years.

This Spring he quit the school and then came storming back, determined to undo changes. Nobody wanted to fight him in court over it because that would’ve destroyed the school.

Jerry says this is his last year.

Shalhevet’s deficit for this year is running at $2 million.

Esther Feder is the president of the school board. Her family has a lot of money.

Shalhevet just got spruced up for the new year. The money to do that probably came from the Feders.

Shalhevet’s new K-8th school is flourishing. A lot of families came over from Harkham Hillel as part of the white flight from the dusky Persians and Israelis.

Shalhevet’s high school needs a minimum of 80 students per class. This year’s senior class has about 30 members. The reduced numbers can be largely attributed to the marijuana brownies scandal of four years ago.

As I wrote in 2003: "A girl on a recent Shalhevet trip ate marijuana-laced chocolate brownies. She panicked and was hospitalized. She was fine. Afterwards, she refused to reveal who baked the brownies. Shalhevet, the most left-wing of Orthodox day schools in Los Angeles with an identical co-ed curriculum, has a zero tolerance drug policy, meaning anyone caught with drugs is expelled."

I believe that the solution to Shalhevet’s enrollment problems is embracing its inner slut. If I was a hormone-driven Jewish boy and I heard that Shalhevet girls were sluts, I’d lobby my parents to go there.

More fornication and less Kohlbergian moral development should fatten those coffers and help the Jewish people reproduce.

Many Shalhevet students in 11th and 12th grade are leaving the school to study at Santa Monica Junior College, which does embrace its inner slut.

Tuition at Shalhevet runs $23,000 a year. YULA is about $20,000 a year.

Jerry Friedman holds up Harvard-Westlake as the model. For K-8th grade, he looks to Maimonidies and Hillel and matches their tuitions.

Morale among Shalhevet’s teachers has been low the past couple of years. They want to get rid of Jerry Friedman and principal Sam Gomberg. A number of the school’s best teachers quit (Dr. Yoss, Steve Lux, Petrella).

Jerry tends to wander in at 10:30 a.m. He enjoys a leisurely lunch and then is gone by 3 p.m.

Even when Sam’s there, he’s not really there. He just closes his door and goes to his private place.

Sometimes he’ll come out and talk about the Kohlberg information he’s found online.

When Sam and Jerry did get involved, the teachers felt bruised and battered.

There was a lot of talk about moral development but not much demonstration of moral leadership.

The school lacks a rudder.

Posted in Shalhevet | Comments Off on Shalhevet At The Crossroads

Who took the modern out of Modern Orthodoxy?

Ben Atlas writes on reshimu.com:

On the subject of the upheaval on Hirhurim.

Enough have been said about the Modern Orthodoxy trending right. But specifically about the vitriol, fundamentalism and intolerance evidenced in the conversations.

Big part of the YU faculty are culturally and ideologically the products of isolated ghettos. This trend has only strengthen in the recent decades and this is the pool where the movement draws it’s Rabbinic leadership.

I have never witnessed the intolerance even in Chabad. There is a deep tradition of acceptance rooted in the turbulent Russian history and culture that runs through Chabad. The kanous, the vitriol and the hate are in my opinion been imported to Chabad from the Hungarians. This incidentally is the source of the phenomenon even within Modern Orthodoxy.

Rabbi Gil Student responds: "Every single one of the YU roshei yeshiva is extremely welcoming and cordial on a personal level to Jews and Gentiles of all kinds. The difficulties arise when they are expected to make public policies that will be used in every community throughout the country or world. In those cases, they tend to be strict. But one a one-on-one level, they are not. I’ve witnessed both personally and with others some bizarre circumstances and seen various roshei yeshiva bend extremely backwards. It’s hard to point out any single individual but if I had to I would say that Rav. Hershel Schachter is an incredibly compassionate and warm person. You would not believe what he has given me permission to publish because "A Jew has to make a parnassah" (for the record, I don’t regularly go to him with questions and just because something is permitted doesn’t mean that I’ve done it). Intermarriage, interracial marriages, non-Orthodox rabbis… You name it, I’ve seen real compassion. The problem is when you publicize it and make it official policy. They are (in my opinion, rightly) hesitant to do that."

Posted in Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Who took the modern out of Modern Orthodoxy?

Study: Casual Sex Only Rewarding For First Few Decades

From The Jewish Press:

ARLINGTON, VA—An alarming new study published in Jewish Action reveals that casual sex, the practice of engaging in frequent, spontaneous sexual encounters with new and exciting partners, may only provide unimaginable pleasure and heart-pounding exhilaration for, at most, 25 to 30 years.

"People who choose to participate in random, no-strings-attached lovemaking sessions with sexually adventurous strangers should be advised that this type of behavior is only incredibly liberating for the first quarter-century or so," said Rabbi Dr. Tzvi Hersh Weinreb, executive vice-president of the Orthodox Union, who coauthored the study on the long-term side effects of living out one’s wildest fantasies on a semi-weekly basis. "Though sometimes it can be longer."

The study observed 100 sexually active volunteers who were not tied down by dull, passionless relationships and were therefore able to have sex with whomever they wanted, whenever they wanted. A control group of individuals who were married or had otherwise allowed their erogenous zones to fall into complete and utter numbness was also monitored for comparison.

Researchers found that those who regularly achieved mind-blowing orgasms without the expectation of commitment often experienced mild feelings of loneliness and a passing regret after as little as three decades of pure physical bliss free of emotional complication.

"There’s a troubling number of adults who spend their prime sexual years in complete coital abandon, then have nothing to show for it but dozens upon dozens of highly detailed erotic memories," Rabbi Weinreb said. "They must be so empty inside, one would think."

Posted in Satire, Sex | Comments Off on Study: Casual Sex Only Rewarding For First Few Decades

‘Charges Of Embezzlement Against Save-A-Heart Foundation’

That was my headline on August 26.

On September 4, the Jewish Journal’s Brad A. Greenberg reports (without noting I broke this story nine days ago):

Los Angeles police last week began looking into the possible embezzlement of more than $700,000 from the Save A Heart Foundation, a nonprofit affiliated with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center that offers paid fellowships to Israeli cardiologists who want to study under specialists at the Westside hospital.

A Save A Heart Foundation board member raised concerns about financial irregularities in May 2006, after the foundation’s longtime administrative assistant began an extended sick leave. Cedars officials were notified, and the hospital’s internal auditing department began an investigation, identifying between $700,000 and $900,000 worth of questionable expenditures by the administrative assistant, according to hospital spokesman Rich Elbaum.

This past March, Cedars officials met with the board of Save A Heart and, Elbaum said, "recommended that they obtain separate counsel, notified them of their obligation to report as a nonprofit organization missing funds to the state attorney general and urged them to report it to the police as well."

But the foundation did not contact the Los Angeles Police Department until Aug. 30, the same day The Journal called asking about the alleged bilking. The press secretary for California Attorney General Jerry Brown said Save A Heart has not filed documents and disclosures that are required of all nonprofits since 2005. The foundation was recently sent a notice of delinquency.

According to Greenberg’s story, the Foundation only contacted the LAPD on August 30, the day the Jewish Journal first called to ask about this story (four days after I broke it).

Brad emails: "Hey Luke, Just so you know I didn’t poach from your blog without giving you credit (which I always do when I mention stories from it on The God Blog), I was working on the Save A Heart story when you posted the anonymous letter, which I also received."

Just because I like to bust your journalistic chops, Brad, you know that it is irrelevant how long ago you had this information. As far as journalistic protocol goes, the story still broke on my site nine days before anywhere else and is an important part of the timeline you describe in your story.

Posted in Cedars-Sinai | Comments Off on ‘Charges Of Embezzlement Against Save-A-Heart Foundation’

Who’s on First? Online/Print Publishing Dilemma

Alan D. Abbey writes:

The lengthy Aug. 31 Jewish Week article by Elli Wohlgelernter(disclosure: Wohlgelernter is a former colleague and personal friend) concerns the recently completed inaugural season of the Israel Baseball League. It details a number of problems that occurred, including a potentially dangerous incident when a player was struck by a ball, a manager’s mid-season departure, sub-standard playing and living conditions for the athletes, and lack of success in marketing the league to Hebrew-speaking Israelis. It also points out how English-speaking "Anglo-Israelis" embraced the project, and how most players enjoyed their experience, despite "bush league" conditions.

The way this story wound itself around the Web, and ruffled feathers of editors, is even more interesting. Wohlgelernter sold the story to four U.S. Jewish newspapers, including the LA Jewish Journal and NY Jewish Week. He worked a "local angle" into as many slightly differing versions as possible, by quoting Jewish and non-Jewish players from the newspapers’ home towns. He was clear up front, and told each paper they would not get an "exclusive." He also gave the story to the blog Tabloid Baby, because of his longstanding relationship with the blog’s creator, Burt Kearns (one of the founding producers of the tabloid television business in the 1980s).

I email Rob Eshman, editor of the Jewish Journal, for his comment. He responds:

Just that a) I’m not the editor of the New Jersey Jewish News and b) Brad is indeed our staff writer. (And Poynter is a journalism web site, ouch).

I liked Elli’s story a lot, and we received a lot of feedback and letters about it. I wish the embargo and pre-pub agreement had been honored is all.

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on Who’s on First? Online/Print Publishing Dilemma

Tabloid Baby: Journo world in uproar over our Elli exclusive!

Tabloid Baby reports:

Our Man Elli in Israel not only broke major news with his story on the first season of the Israel Baseball League, but in breaking the story here on Tabloidbaby.com, he– and we– have established something of a landmark in Internet journalism, as it "illustrates the complex issues of deadlines, exclusivity, paying and non-paying clients, and whether newspapers and Web sites are separate entities."

Journalist Alan Abbey has the article on the Romenesko media news dumpsite this morning.

We at Tabloid Baby have been one of Jim Romenesko’s greatest supporters for a decade. But Jim (left), whose page is part of the Poynter journalism institute site, has proven himself to be a journalistic snob, by refusing to link to any Tabloid Baby stories, no matter their importance. In fact, he’s sent us at least one nasty email because we have the word "Tabloid" in our name. Romenesko obviously doesn’t see our shared connection to the pure roots of journalism that one can’t learn in an ivy-covered "j- school."

And he lost out because of it. We’d sent him a link to Elli’s story– a week ago. He ignored it. Now he has the story a week late and a dollar short. Schmuck.

Posted in Tabloid Baby | Comments Off on Tabloid Baby: Journo world in uproar over our Elli exclusive!

A Jewish Huffington Post

I’m honored to contribute to this new website reshimu.com along with Rabbi Gil Student and company.

Posted in Blogging | Comments Off on A Jewish Huffington Post

War And Peace

Chaim Amalek writes:

Luke, I know you’ve changed your mind about Bush’s decision to invade Iraq. But what about Iran?

1. Should the United States initiate war with Iran to stop it from developing the capability to manufacture nuclear weapons?

2. Should it do so without regard to the costs that such would entail, if in the end it seems likely to help preserve the secuirty of Israel?

3. Should Israel initiate war with Iran, assuming the United States does not join in?

4. If the United States were to go to war with Iran, how do you suppose this would affect the average American’s support for Israel? What role should such considerations play, given the stakes?

Iran’s nuclear program is primarily Israel’s problem (right now) and Israel should take care of it.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on War And Peace