My TV Appearances

Let’s talk about me.

I just bought a WinTV-PVR-250 to digitize my videos.

Not being technically efficient, I hired a friend for $100 and he spent three hours setting it up. If you’re savvy, you can probably pull it together in less than an hour.

Here’s my appearance on the KNBC news report about shul shopping.

ABC’s I-Caught show profiles blogebrities.

The sex.com story for British TV.

My 60 Minutes appearance Nov. 23, 2003.

VH1’s Celebrity Blackmail documentary.

Fox Files, March 25, 1999.

VH1’s Celebrity Babylon, Oct. 12, 2003.

Entertainment Tonight, February 8, 1999.

True Hollywood Story Part II Part III

National Film Board of Canada’s documentary Give Me Your Soul (Oct. 2000) Part Two Part Three Part Four

Cell Phone Shenanigans

National Enquirer’s TV Show ‘Uncovered’ June 13, 2001

Luke’s Acting Reel, Aug. 1995

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on My TV Appearances

Huma Abedin

Is it just me or is the TV news these days showing a lot of clips of Huma Abedin next to Hillary Clinton? It seems to me the MSM is dying to report more on Hillary’s intriguing connection to Huma.

Posted in Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin | Comments Off on Huma Abedin

NY Mag Is Off The Hook

From NYPost:

November 7, 2007 — Lonely hearts around town won’t be able to find rent-a-dates in the back pages of New York magazine anymore.

The popular weekly announced yesterday it will stop accepting sex ads in the wake of protest threats by the local chapter of the National Organization for Women.

The feminist group called the magazine the "marketing arm of the organized-crime world of prostitution and human trafficking" because of ads touting "Asians Gone Wild," "Asian Bliss" or "Hot Latinas."

"We worked to educate them on the connections trafficking and the existing sex industry," said Sonia Ossorio, president of NOW-NYC. "Numerous publications have come to the conclusion that it’s not a business they really want to be in."

New York magazine became the 15th publication this year, including Time Out New York and the New York Press, that agreed to end the "escort" and "model" ads that are often codes for prostitution.

"New York has been trying to eliminate this section for years. The business is prospering at this magazine and it was high time to get out of a business we were never comfortable being in," said magazine spokeswoman Serena Torrey.

Posted in Prostitution | Comments Off on NY Mag Is Off The Hook

Dennis Prager: Happy People Vote Republican

On the first hour of his radio show Nov. 2, Prager said: "Elliot Spitzer is a liberal Democrat… One of the major reasons for the greater acceptance of illegal immigration by the Democrats is so that they can get more votes. They don’t win on American-born folks. They need to cultivate another community of victims. If you don’t feel yourself a victim, you are 75% less likely to vote Democrat… Cultivating a victim self-identity it is indispensable to Democrat party victory. That’s not good for the country. The happier you are, the more likely you are to vote Republican. All polls show that Republicans are happier."

Speaking of happy people, I did a 45-minute interview this afternoon with Ben Atlas, the founder of Reshimu.com.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Comments Off on Dennis Prager: Happy People Vote Republican

Ann Coulter Wants Jews to Become Christian — So What?

Dennis Prager writes:

There is nothing in what Ann Coulter said to a Jewish interviewer on CNBC that indicates she hates Jews or wishes them ill, or does damage to the Jewish people or the Jewish state. And if none of those criteria is present, how can someone be labeled anti-Semitic?

 

What damage has she ever done to Jews? What is wrong with a person believing that it would be better if another person adopted their faith? Is there one liberal who doesn’t believe that a conservative would be better — "perfected," if you will — by embracing liberal beliefs and values? Why is it laudable for a liberal to hope that conservatives convert to liberalism, but dangerous and hate-filled when a Christian hopes that Jews or anyone else will go to heaven (that is, after all, Ann Coulter’s and most other Christians’ primary concern) by believing in Jesus?

I have read Jewish and non-Jewish writers who argue that Ann Coulter’s words will lead to another Auschwitz. How does one respond to irrationality? How does one respond to hysteria?

There is also a move to boycott Ann Coulter, so dangerous are her words. Of course, there is no such Jewish or liberal boycott of former President Jimmy Carter, who has done real damage to the Jewish people by describing Israel as an "apartheid" state in the very title of his anti-Israel book. In fact, Carter was invited to speak on his loathsome book at Brandeis University, an ostensibly Jewish university. But for many Jews and liberals, real hatred, real damage to Jewish security can only come from the right, especially from Christians on the right. So Ann Coulter, who has done nothing in her life to compromise Jewish welfare, is to be boycotted, but Jimmy Carter is worthy of invitations to speak. Jewish groups even invite John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, the authors of "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy," which is essentially a tempered modern-day version of "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." But Ann Coulter is beyond the pale. And she said nothing to harm Jews.

Posted in Dennis Prager | Comments Off on Ann Coulter Wants Jews to Become Christian — So What?

Shalom Auslander Speaks Monday Night At Vroman’s Book Store In Pasadena

Here’s the audio. Video. Pic Pic Pic Pic Pic

2:30 p.m. I leave my house to beat the traffic.

3 p.m. Park on Colorado Blvd in Pasadena with four hours to kill.

I go for a walk. I consume three Passion iced teas at Starbucks (refills are only 50c) and reread Chaim Potok’s "The Book of Lights."

6 p.m. I hit Vroman’s and scan the biography and current events sections.

6:40 p.m. I smuggle my bag upstairs with my cameras. I hope this enormous expenditure of time and gas is worth it.

7:10 p.m. About 40 people sit in the audience (I’m the only one wearing a yarmulke).

Shalom Auslander (middle child) walks in. He’s compact and tightly coiled.

He looks up only once during his 26-minutes of reading.

At the end he says, "I’m available for weddings and bar mitzvahs."

"Questions? Accusations?"

Question: "How did you escape from your upbringing?"

Shalom: "I got lucky. I married someone who was also on the run… It took about 15 years. It wasn’t easy."

"When you leave [that community], they slam the door behind you."

Shalom says his son "believes in Spiderman."

Question: "Did you consider having photographs in the memoir?"

Shalom: "I don’t have any photographs of myself. I had a bad break-off with my family and as I was leaving the house, it didn’t occur to me to take some pictures off the wall."

Shalom sells about 50 books. About 20 people line up to get Shalom to sign their books.

Earlier today, Auslander appeared on Patt Morrison’s radio show.

"You know NPR," says Shalom. "They love those self-hating Jews. I’m on there all the time."

Shalom says he doesn’t read reviews. About three months ago, he stopped reading about himself online.

After his signing, Shalom talks to lit blogger Mark Sarvas (his novel Harry, Revised comes out next year) for about 20 minutes.

I hover on the outside of the conversation, feeling excluded.

Mark, 42 yo, blogged Nov. 4:

Although I thought Shalom Auslander’s Nextbook column on Los Angeles was a compendium of every tedious, banal cliche ever hurled at this city, I’m really not – despite some perceptions – one to hold a grudge.  I thought his memoir, Foreskin’s Lament, was just terrific, and I say so in my review in today’s Philadelphia Inquirer.

Auslander succeeds because, although superficially extreme in its concerns – God is a thug and Judaism can be ridiculous – Foreskin’s Lament manages to occupy a station left open in the current Religion Debates. At one end we find the True Believers and at the other we find Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins denouncing religion as the root of all evil, the solace of dupes. For all his asperity, Auslander reports to us from the middle, as one who can’t deny religion’s contradictions and lunacies yet has been unable to entirely do away with belief and its necessity. In this, he is probably more representative of most Americans than either of the extremes, and it is in those moments that Foreskin’s Lament is most heartfelt and effective.

As Auslander recently said in an interview at Bookslut.com, "It’s easy to just slam the door on it, but there are people I know who find solace in it. And, certainly, the idea that there’s a God should be right." Perhaps beneath all the name-calling fury and scabrous wit, Foreskin’s Lament is intended as a parable on the strange durability of faith. That would be so Auslander.

Auslander explains his Nextbook column ripping LA as a rant. It was the only way to meet his deadline.

When I extend my hand and say my name, Shalom says, "I know."

When I introduce myself to Mark and his friend, there’s no light of recognition. Why should there be? I don’t write literature.

Sarvas tells Auslander that his blogging doesn’t distract him from his more serious writing. "Some days I do it in half an hour. Some days I do it in three or four hours. It motivates me. People are waiting for something."

"Have there been many angry folks who’ve written?"

Shalom: "No. They all go to Amazon."

His average customer review for Foreskin’s Lament is 3.5 out of a possible 5 (18 reviews).

There are five one-star reviews.

Theorist writes on Amazon: "Shalom Auslander was abused by his father as a child. In response, he attacks not only his father, but God and Judaism as well. He writes in a breezy style. It’s sort of what "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" would sound like if it were read on "This American Life"."

An Aussie in the US for 20 years (Mark’s friend) says to Shalom: "You’re going to have to deal with them in the real world."

Shalom: "I used to fear they’d come to my house and throw a brick. But I’ve got big dogs and big guns."

Mark says his upbringing was the opposite of Shalom’s. His grandparents were holocaust survivors and his parents were agnostic.

Shalom met a German-Jewish couple in a German restaurant.

He said to the Jew, "Your parents must love her."

The man said they did. His parents were Holocaust survivors. Shalom met them. They did indeed love their German shiksa daughter in law.

When Shalom related how as a child he was told that eating trafe and violating the Torah gave Hitler post-humous victories, the survivors were horrified.

Shalom: "It’s like being raised by homosexuals who say that all straight sex is bad."

After Mark leaves, Shalom sits with me for ten minutes.

"I saw out of the corner of my eye a guy wearing tzitzit and a yarmulke… You get worried. Then I recognized you."

"I get picked up at 4:30 a.m. It’s not a bad problem to have but I just want to get home and get this over with. This is the biggest trick God’s ever played on me. Spend 30 years getting out of it, write about it, and now I’m running around JCCs (Jewish Community Centers)…"

Luke: "I’ve been disappointed in all this positive stuff from all the Jewish publications except The Jewish Press."

Shalom: "Really? I haven’t been reading my reviews. I don’t know any writers who read that s—. It’s so unhealthy."

Luke: "Really? You don’t?"

Shalom: "I did when the pre-press was coming out. Unfortunately, the pre-press are the lunatics."

Luke: "You don’t Google your name?"

Shalom: "I’ve done it."

He says Amazon reviewers are bottom-feeders. "They’re people who can’t even be bothered to blog. It’s not that hard."

Luke: "All these understanding laudatory reviews in Jewish publications…"

Shalom: "It’s driving you crazy."

Luke: "I want some vitriol. What’s the fun in being a heretic unless people become vitriolic?"

Shalom: "Unless you’re really reactionary, you defend the Jews no matter… As I said on NPR today, there’s nowhere in the book that I’m saying that Judaism is wrong. I’m saying that what people taught me is f—– up. If you like Judaism and want to rant about how great it is, you don’t yell at the taught. Yell at the teacher.

"I feel like I pulled up next to a car on the road, told them they have a flat, they accuse me of hating cars. It doesn’t make any sense. There’s nowhere I say it is foolish to think that the God of Judaism isn’t God. It isn’t [Richard] Dawkins."

"I thought it would be OK when The New Yorker ran the hockey piece and people got f—– off and wrote angry letters… This was before I pulled myself off the web. And six months later they ran a chapter about my father trying to build an ark and there’s abuse and nothing. Not a word about that. You have to be a real prick to read that and say, ‘You shouldn’t be saying that.’

"Once you see that this is isn’t looking to staby anybody in the book…

"I’d say to people who think Judaism or Catholicism or Islam is a great religion, well, there are a lot of people out there who are teaching kids some f—— up stuff. So take all that religious fervor you have and go get ’em."

Luke: "Anybody bitch you out at your readings?"

Shalom: "No."

And he’s had a lot of Orthodox Jews show up to his readings (particularly in New York).

Shalom: "In London there’s a much stronger anger against the specific teachings of Orthodoxy. This ancient regressive God-is-punishing-us-every-day. They’re angry not because they’re assimilating but because they’re saying this is poisonous. This is why people are leaving.

"The people who are most upset [at Shalom’s memoir] are the Reform. Reform rabbis get upset because they think they’ve got the answer. They think Reform was created to answer this. But I don’t buy that either. My feeling is ‘Thanks but I’m not in the market right now.’

"The Reform rabbis come out and they want to be your buddy. ‘Hey, why don’t you come over to my temple?’"

"I’m not looking to change anybody’s mind."

Luke: "A lot of people in my Orthodox shul found it hilarious."

Shalom: "That’s good news."

Luke: "Are women sending you naked pictures of themselves?"

Shalom: "No. I’ve got to write about something else. One or two but you can see it in their eyes that they’re crazy."

"I had dreams of being a writer and looking out at the crowd and it being filled with hot black women. Instead it’s filled with old Jewish ladies. Good one, God.

"What do I need to write about? Rap?"

"You bleed on the page… Honestly, I tell people about your blog because it makes me laugh. I’m not interested in the goings on in Jewish life but the moments when you lose it. The moments of humanity. A lot of blogs are like, ‘Here’s my personality and I stick to it.’ I find it interesting."

Luke: "George Orwell said that the only parts of an autobiography that he believed were the shameful parts."

Shalom: "Yeah. And there are a lot of ways to do that. There’s the kind of NPR way where you make fun of yourself. You’re biggest fool in the room. I believe it letting it be angry. That’s what’s striking a chord with a lot of people who wouldn’t otherwise come to readings… Frustration with the way life’s gone. ‘This isn’t in my script.’ That’s honest.

"It’s better than a joint. I was always going for that but this is better."

Luke: "You’ve given it up."

Shalom: "No. It’s not working for me. It’s having the opposite effect. It might just be because of touring. I’ve spoken to some people. They’re big pot smokers and writers. And they say, ‘Never on tour.’ You’re too anxious."

Shalom leaves with a woman for dinner in Silverlake.

I go home. I can’t sleep until past 3 a.m. Then I dream I’m having dinner with Dennis Prager and a bunch of friends. He gives example after example about how I’ve been a jerk to him. I justify my actions.

I wake up.

Posted in Shalom Auslander | Comments Off on Shalom Auslander Speaks Monday Night At Vroman’s Book Store In Pasadena

Victims Of ‘The Game’

I had a great interview today with a beautiful young woman who had her life ruined by a PUA.

What’s a PUA? A pick-up artist.

The Bible of pick-up artists is a book by Neil Strauss — "The Game: Penetrating the Secret Society of Pickup Artists."

It shows you how to seduce chicks quickly and cheaply.

A player seduces you and then leaves you, my friend says. A PUA seduces you and then keeps you around as a friend so he can have regular sex with you and other chicks he hooks.

I’m fascinated by "The Game" and the fast seduction community. I’ve never mastered the techniques because I fear they are deceitful (or quickly lead to deceit).

I IM with my new friend.

Woman: AWESOME!
Woman: That’s what I feel
Woman: I want to expose the PUAs…. [The] PUA community is not out looking for the one
Woman: they are looking for girls to sleep with and "befriend"
Luzdedos1: "always leave her better than you found her" lol
Woman: OH GOD
Woman: GOSH*
Woman: lol
Woman: NO well this PUA has not
Woman: he’s left me.. in a really bad place
Luzdedos1: can you be a moral manwhore?
Luzdedos1: i dont think so.
Woman: no fucking way
Woman: and this PUA is so crazy… that
Woman: he has ended a friendship and potential relationship over me
Luzdedos1: i thought he was with you? he’s boinking other chix?
Luzdedos1: seducing chix becomes a dangerous addiction
Woman: oh my gosh yes
Woman: He misrepresented himself to me
Woman: do you know which PUA im talking about?
Luzdedos1: no
Woman: I wish I could say…
Luzdedos1: why not?
Woman: good question
Woman: I dont know myself lol
Woman: maybe because I’m embarrased
Woman: maybe because he’d kill me if he found out I told Mr. Luke Ford the hated blogger lol
Luzdedos1: what’s your phone #?
Woman: wow no pick up line?

I call and ask my new friend: "When did you get involved in the pick-up movement?"

Friend: "It was an accident. When someone misrepresents themselves to you… I’m kinda stupid. I guess I’m gullible. I got pulled in to a lifestyle that doesn’t fit me. Eww."

Luke: "So when did you get picked up by a pick-up artist?"

Friend: "You are so bad. I can’t believe I’m telling a writer this. You’re going to write all this stuff up. I know you are."

Luke: "How did he present himself?"

Friend: "He was intensely pursuing me. Initially I wasn’t attracted to him. He’s my opposite. He’s a person who grows on you. You find him attractive because his personality is attractive. He does cute things. Once he started texting and pursuing more and more, I started really liking the person because he was so sweet and he was saying awesome things and making me feel really good."

"He said he wasn’t a pick-up artist. That he used to be. He’s more looking for a serious relationship. He’s not running around like a hoodlum."

Luke: "Did he present himself as wanting a serious relationship?"

Friend: "Now that I think about it, I don’t know. It seemed like it with the things he was doing, texting and calling numerous times a day. I’m thinking, ‘Wow, this person really likes me.’ I’m thinking he wouldn’t do this unless he was interested in pursuing something.

"Normally a guy who just sees you as a friend or as a one-night stand isn’t going to put in as much effort as this person did. It was a game. It was a way of seeing if he could. And once he could, that was it."

"Sometimes the PUA makes the girl think, ‘We’re just friends.’ Also, they make the girl think, ‘You’re the only one’ but they’re still friends… I don’t know. It’s so freakin’ weird.

"They don’t say that they date other people."

"Now I wonder if I am of any value to this person because he hardly spends any time with me."

"After I moved here, he wasn’t texting and calling as much. He always had an excuse… Maybe it was mission accomplished? Wow, that sucks! Yet his personality is so sweet that you can’t hate him."

"I guess in the PUA community a girl is not loyal if you’re friends with another guy. In the community, if you become friends with another guy’s girl, you’re dishonest. You’re not a loyal friend. It’s all about the control. He doesn’t really like me. He wants to control me."

Luke: "This PUA wants you to be monogamous with him but he’s not monogamous to you."

Woman: "Yeah."

"I’m not really good at keeping things to myself."

"You ask good questions."

"I just want girls to be aware… There are nice girls out there who are being taken advantage of. It’s not fair. I’m a nice girl. I don’t deserve to be sucked into this lifestyle."

"I have millionaires and billionaires and doctors and lawyers trying to pick me up… I don’t even care. I don’t even give them the time of day. Why should I give a PUA?

"These guys aren’t looking for love. They’re looking for as many vaginas as they can. It makes me queasy just thinking about it."

Luke: "If you had known he was primarily interested in sex and that he planned to continue to screw other women, would you have slept with him?"

Friend: "Absolutely not."

"Every girl wants to be in a relationship."

Freelance writer Chelsea G. Summers responds to my inquiry: "Luke: To be honest, although I love Neil Strauss’s writing (especially The Dirt and Jenna’s bio), I’ve not read The Game. From what little I know of it, however, I’m not enthused. I think anyone who relies on making people feel badly about themselves in order to take advantage of their vulnerability can’t really respect himself in the morning. Plus, Mystery and his love of hats and headgear in general kind of freaks me out."

Posted in Dating | Comments Off on Victims Of ‘The Game’

Raging Rafaeli sues Israeli newspaper

Dikla Kadosh writes:

Leo’s ex, who’s quickly moved on to pro surfer Kelly Slater, has an odd way of doing damage control.

After the Israeli supermodel tarnished her image in an October Yediot Ahronot article titled "Bar Refaeli Versus the State of Israel," where she essentially declared how little she cared about the country of her birth (see my last post), she decided suing the largest newspaper in Israel for libel would be the best way to handle the storm of negative publicity.

According to Haaretz, another Israeli newspaper, Refaeli’s lawyer sent a scathing letter to Yediot, claiming she was manipulated and misquoted and deserves half a million shekel ($125,000) in personal damages.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on Raging Rafaeli sues Israeli newspaper

Illegal Immigration

Mickey Kaus writes:

It seems like only months ago we were told the immigration issue was splitting Republicans. Now it’s E.J. Dionne wringing his hands about the

worry among Democrats that Republicans are ready to use impatience with illegal immigration to win back voters dissatisfied with the status quo.

What’s changed? Well, President Bush–the main politician doing the GOP-splitting–is leaving the scene. The Republican electorate seems to have decisively turned against his illegal-immigrant semi-amnesty. Result: No more split! But the powerful GOP anti-legalization sentiment was obviously latent even in 2006. The MSM just chose not to notice.

…Dionne eventually dismisses anti-illegal-immigration sentiment with a classic paleolib device:

Yet at a moment when the electorate is very angry, it’s not surprising that some voters are channeling their discontent through the immigration issue. It’s happened before in our history. [E.A.]

Of course, pre-Clinton Democrats also dismissed voter anger on the welfare issue as displaced discontent about economic stagnation (when they weren’t dismissing it as plain old racism). Welfare recipients were "scapegoats," we were told. Then it turned out that the voters who were angry at welfare were angry at welfare. It’s just possible, as Michael Barone suggests, that the voters who are angry at illegal immigration are angry at illegal immigration.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on Illegal Immigration

Two New Books On Suffering, Evil and the Existence of God

Stanley Fish writes:

Bart D. Ehrman is a professor of religious studies and his book is titled “God’s Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question – Why We Suffer.” A graduate of Princeton Theological Seminary, Ehrman trained to be a scholar of New Testament Studies and a minister. Born-again as a teenager, devoted to the scriptures (he memorized entire books of the New Testament), strenuously devout, he nevertheless lost his faith because, he reports, “I could no longer reconcile the claims of faith with the fact of life . . . I came to the point where I simply could not believe that there is a good and kindly disposed Ruler who is in charge.” “The problem of suffering,” he recalls, “became for me the problem of faith.”

Much of the book is taken up with Ehrman’s examination of biblical passages that once gave him solace, but that now deliver only unanswerable questions: “Given [the] theology of selection – that God had chosen the people of Israel to be in a special relationship with him – what were Ancient Israelite thinkers to suppose when things did not go as planned or expected? . . . . How were they to explain the fact that the people of God suffered from famine, drought, and pestilence?”

Ehrman knows and surveys the standard answers to these questions – God is angry at a sinful, disobedient people; suffering is redemptive, as Christ demonstrated on the cross; evil and suffering exist so that God can make good out of them; suffering induces humility and is an antidote to pride; suffering is a test of faith – but he finds them unpersuasive and as horrible in their way as the events they fail to explain: “If God tortures, maims and murders people just to see how they will react – to see if they will not blame him, when in fact he is to blame – then this does not seem to me to be a God worthy of worship.”

Posted in Theodicy | Comments Off on Two New Books On Suffering, Evil and the Existence of God