Powell’s turns the page

From the LAT:

…The company started selling books online in 1994 — before Amazon — and ships millions of dollars of books, about 90% of them outside the Pacific Northwest, each year. (The company, privately held, does not release its financial data.)

"The key was identifying what the Web was going to mean and putting a lot of resources into it," said Jim Milliot, business and news director at Publishers Weekly. "Recognizing that a neighborhood bookstore, to survive in the long term, needs to do more than sell books to people who walk in the front door."

But the Internet has gone from being a clear winner for Powell’s to a source of apprehension. Powell described his business as being "flat," and said he hoped there was a way to "reenergize" it but couldn’t imagine how. He’s getting it from both sides: Amazon has posted enormous gains this year, just as consumers have begun selling used books directly on the Web.

"The Internet has allowed anybody to become a used-book seller," said John Mutter of the blog Shelf Awareness (shelf-awareness.com). "Go on EBay and set up an account. The sheer availability does press the prices down."

…"It’s probably as tense as it’s ever been," Publishers Weekly’s Milliot said of the business climate. "The whole industry, from the publishers down to the bookstores, is uncertain where things are going to go. No one worries that the physical book is going to disappear. But they’re all fighting for a smaller slice of the pie."

…Portland, with its comparatively low rents and rich pedestrian culture, has been a hospitable home to bookstores. (Indeed, in what may be a bittersweet footnote for many Los Angeles book buyers, the entire stocks of some of L.A.’s closed used bookstores — Other Times on Pico Boulevard and Arnold Herr Bookseller on Fairfax Avenue — have been shipped to Powell’s over the last two years.)

Posted in Economics | Comments Off on Powell’s turns the page

Casting For President

Rob Long tells Mickey Kaus on BloggingHeadsTV about Barack Obama: "He’s not going to be that far left… People will say… He’s going to make me feel good about this country and the unity we need. I want to elect somebody that I’ll like…

"When Americans elect a president, they’re casting a guy who will be on their TV for four years. Is he going to wear well? They’re going to like Obama. They’re going to like what it says about us as a country and they’re going to like what it says about them pulling the lever for Obama… As long as he doesn’t scare us…"

Mickey: "It turns out he’s going to be the black Jimmy Carter. He’s a moralist. So is Huckabee."

Posted in Politics | Comments Off on Casting For President

Flipping Out? The Impact of the ‘Year in Israel’

I read this new book by Shalom Z. Berger, Daniel Jacobson and Chaim I. Waxman.

It’s a solid book. There are few surprises. It cites surveys that show that high school graduates who spend a year in Israel in yeshiva become more observant of Jewish rituals but not more ethical (because they are already super-ethical after their Jewish day school education, writes Shalom Berger).

I’m inherently suspicious of what people say in surveys. What’s the incentive to answer a survey accurately? I can see that only losers will put much effort into such things. 

I don’t trust what people say about themselves.

Surely there are better ways of analyzing this issue.

One thing caught my attention — Shalom Z. Berger’s matter of fact description of the tricks some Orthodox Jews pull to get out of the draft. There are few things more obnoxious than using your religion to get out of communal obligations.

(I regard the draft as unnecessary state coercion. The government should simply raise the pay of soldiers until enough citizens volunteer for the job (or foreigners volunteer for guaranteed citizenship after their service). I don’t care if more poor people than rich people choose to serve in the military any more than I care that more poor people than rich people choose risky dangerous civiliian jobs.)

From page seven:

My grandfather had sold his sweater store on the Lower East Side of Manhattan and purchased the farm in the unsuccessful hope that his son — and daughter, who was studying nursing — would be deemed "essential farm workers" and therefore exempt from the draft.

When I asked my father why he made the choices that he did, he described the process of what passed for "College Guidance" in his yeshiva. One of the rabbis called each student into his office and asked about the student’s plans. When a student said, for example, that he planned to go to college and study engineering, he was told that fixing cars was not a good job for a Jewish boy, and that after a few years of continued study in yeshiva he could get a job as a rebbe in an elementary school. Unless yeshiva study offered an immediate benefit — avoiding the draft, for example — few chose to remain.

According to Yashar Books:

Flipping Out?: Myth or Fact? The Impact of the “Year in Israel” by Shalom Z. Berger, Daniel Jacobson and Chaim I. Waxman takes a hard look at a phenomenon that has become a major source of both inspiration and consternation in the Jewish community.

The Jewish community has changed over the past four decades for many reasons, prominent among them the phenomenon of large numbers of students spending a year after high school studying Torah full time in Israel. The results of this “Year in Israel” can be felt in many synagogues and homes, with a good deal of increased ritual observance and dedication to Torah study – the much discussed “Shift to the Right.”

Many questions arise from these changes. Have these students been brainwashed? Has their primary education so failed them that a single year in Israel is more influential than over a decade of American schooling? Have they found an easy way to alleviate some hidden insecurity? Or are they merely inspired by a profoundly rich and spiritual lifestyle? And how long does this newfound religious devotion last? Is it really the start of a radically different life path or is it merely a short-term religious high that becomes more moderate over time? These are just a few of the questions that need to be asked.

This book gathers together insights from three talmidei chachamim who are top experts on the subject, each from a different perspective. Rabbi Shalom Berger, Ed.D., and Rabbi Daniel Jacobson, Psy.D., both performed statistical studies and wrote doctoral dissertations on the phenomenon of studying in Israel for a year. Rabbi Berger, drawing on his years of experience as a leading mechanech (Torah instructor) in the U.S. and Israel, approaches the subject from the perspective of an educator and addresses the “what” of the changes in students-what religious changes do we see in students from the time they leave to Israel to a year after they return. Rabbi Jacobson looks at the “Year in Israel” from the perspective of his psychological training and explores the “why” of the equation-what internal and external influences on these students cause the changes that happen.

Dr. Chaim Waxman, a distinguished sociologist, looks at the impact of this phenomenon on the broader community from the perspective of a sociologist. How does the “Year in Israel” fit in with the historical relationship between American and Israeli Jewry, and how has it changed the American Jewish community? His decades of profound study of the Jewish community have earned him a place as one of our leading social commentators. Finally and significantly, Richard M. Joel adds to this impressive mix with an introduction based on his experience as the president of the Hillel college campus organization and currently the president of Yeshiva University.

PRAISE FOR THE BOOK:

"Providing fine historical and religious perspective, as well as religiously and spiritually sensitive, “Flipping Out” is psychologically insightful and sociologically astute, while providing concrete guidance and counsel to students, parents, rabbis, educators, and concerned members of our communities. This volume, based on copious research, and careful analysis, is inordinately well done, and will, I am sure, prove to be an invaluable resource for all of these audiences and more. Bravo!"

—Rabbi Basil Herring, Executive Vice President of the Rabbinical Council of America

"The “Year in Israel” has become an important rite of passage for American Orthodox teenagers, and is growing in popularity among their non-Orthodox peers. This pioneering volume helps us to understand this phenomenon and its larger implications. Anyone interested in contemporary American Judaism, and anyone who has studied for a year in Israel or who contemplates doing so, will find this book well worth pondering."

—Jonathan D. Sarna, Joseph H. & Belle R. Braun Professor of American Jewish History, Brandeis University, and author of American Judaism: A History

Posted in Book Reviews | Comments Off on Flipping Out? The Impact of the ‘Year in Israel’

After Annapolis Thoughts About The Role Of American Orthodox Jews

By Rabbi Michael J. Broyde and Rabbi Yitzchok Adlerstein:

The Annapolis Peace Conference has come and gone, and negotiations are really just beginning, some in private and some in public. And while differences of opinion abound within the Orthodox world, during wartime our public differences ought to be put aside.

Israel is at war in the Middle East. It is at war with Hamas in Gaza (and maybe even with the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank); it is at war with Hizbullah in Lebanon; and it is at war with Iran regarding its funding of terrorists and its potential nuclear capacity.

Every war has its chain of command. Soldiers may detest a general, but the consequences can be lethal if they choose not to listen to authority. Calls for massive protests against possible Israeli decisions, no matter how compelling, have to be seen against this backdrop. The stakes are not Israel’s borders, but its existence.

Many Palestinians realize they are no match for the IDF. So with skill and determination, they’ve opened up yet another front – the battle for the hearts and minds of people around the globe. In this battle, they have the upper hand.

The Durban conference on racism in 2001 unleashed a torrent of anti-Semitism the likes of which had not been since the Holocaust and made hatred of Jews fashionable once again. While Israel succeeded in remarketing itself into a biotech giant and a go-to place for venture capital, Arab propagandists were busy doing their own rebranding of the Jewish state.

The relentless portrayal of Israel as an occupier and an aggressor has made it one of the most detested countries on earth. The propagandists have gone from campus to campus, church to church, patiently telling a one-sided story that has not been balanced by our version. Many campus faculties, labor unions, and church denominations have been enlisted in the campaign to delegitimize Israel and all those who believe in the eternal bond between Eretz Yisrael and the Jewish people.

The combined depredations of Jimmy Carter, Walt and Mearsheimer’s book on the Israel Lobby, and others have brought the battle to the United States in a larger sense than ever before. Israel’s enemies used to criticize its actions. Today they criticize its very existence, demonizing it as in illegal pariah state. This should be a profoundly sobering realization for all of us who care about Israel.

Left, right and center, all of us in the Orthodox world should understand that anti-Zionism is all too often a cover for anti-Semitism. The government of the State of Israel, like it or not, is seen by the vast majority of the population of this planet as the government of the Jews. Supporting that government in public, even if we have to bite our lips while doing so, means supporting the notion of a Jewish nation.

When we withhold that support, many cease to regard us as a nation and see us only as a fractious family, a house divided. We must realize this and understand how our criticism of Israel can be misunderstood by others.

Public advocacy against the policies of the government of Israel confuses friends of the Jewish state, who see that even Israel’s most fervent advocates do not support the government. Many of Israel’s remaining supporters are genuinely puzzled by the internal divisions within American Jewry, and by the diminished ardor that American Jews have for Israel. The Orthodox community functions as a model of commitment to Israel, partially compensating for that diminished ardor.

In the minds of many, “Orthodox” translates into Jews who take their tradition and history seriously. We should not abdicate that role. As a matter of prudence, the message of American Orthodoxy has to be that we offer unqualified support for the State of Israel, and the American government needs to hear that message delivered in a very loud voice. If we need to express our concerns and indignation, we should only do so quietly (but forcefully) – when the cameras are not on us, the microphones are off, and only our family and closest friends are listening.

Around our non-Jewish neighbors and colleagues, every question, every criticism of Israel ought to be accompanied by a countering statement of genuine and unqualified support. If they are to hear the negative, they must hear the positive as well, lest they come to believe that our passion has cooled. When, according to a recent study, only twenty percent of American Jews under the age of thirty-five declare strong attachment to Israel, all of us need to become ambassadors, offsetting the counterexample of others.

We should also prepare ourselves for the possibility that the government of Israel will make choices that we might not fully support. If the people of Israel embrace options that we disagree with, we should not become victims of our own rhetoric and be any less passionate in our support of the State of Israel, even if we disagree with a particular decision.

Posted in Israel, Orthodoxy | Comments Off on After Annapolis Thoughts About The Role Of American Orthodox Jews

Haredim Sing ‘YMCA’ Rally For HD TV

"YES cable Israel takes advantage of the Haredi tendency to protest and uses it in an advertisement for HDTV."

Posted in Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Haredim Sing ‘YMCA’ Rally For HD TV

Chuck Hagel For President?

Mickey Kaus blogs:

Reminder: Back in January, the courageously incoherent Sen. Chuck Hagel called the "surge"

"the most dangerous foreign policy blunder in this country since Vietnam, if it’s carried out."

He got lots of glowing coverage. But whatever the surge is, it isn’t that. … Why mention this? In case anyone feels an urge to draft MSM favorite Hagel for president on the Unity’08 ticket.

I talk Hollywood right-wingers with the expressive and strangely compelling Rob Long.

Hillary’s supposed to be the experienced one who can handle foreign policy crises. Yet in the current campaign it’s Hillary who seems panicked and Obama who projects calm. Just saying. … Maybe this is how "running for president [became] a qualification for being President."

Sell your studio stock: The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers has hired Chris Lehane, according to Hollywood-writers-strike-must-read Nikki Finke. The producers’ group apparently wants "to take a more aggressive approach in its public relations" (LAT‘s words). Lehane is the counterproductive overspinner whose "aggressive" approach made Al Gore, John Kerry and then Wes Clark president. He also helped California Gov. Gray Davis establish his political legacy in his recall contest against fading action star Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Posted in Mickey Kaus | Comments Off on Chuck Hagel For President?

Study: Fellatio may significantly decrease the risk of breast cancer in women

From CNN:

(AP) — Women who perform the act of fellatio and swallow semen on a regular basis, one to two times a week, may reduce their risk of breast cancer by up to 40 percent, a North Carolina State University study found.

Doctors had never suspected a link between the act of fellatio and breast cancer, but new research being performed at North Carolina State University is starting to suggest that there could be an important link between the two.

In a study of over 15,000 women suspected of having performed regular fellatio and swallowed the ejaculatory fluid, over the past ten years, the researchers found that those actually having performed the act regularly, one to two times a week, had a lower occurance of breast cancer than those who had not. There was no increased risk, however, for those who did not regularly perform.

"I think it removes the last shade of doubt that fellatio is actually a healthy act," said Dr. A.J. Kramer of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, who was not involved in the research. "I am surprised by these findings, but am also excited that the researchers may have discovered a relatively easy way to lower the occurance of breast cancer in women."

The University researchers stressed that, though breast cancer is relatively uncommon, any steps taken to reduce the risk would be a wise decision.

"Only with regular occurance will your chances be reduced, so I encourage all women out there to make fellatio an important part of their daily routine," said Dr. Helena Shifteer, one of the researchers at the University. "Since the emergence of the research, I try to fellate at least once every other night to reduce my chances."

Posted in Health | Comments Off on Study: Fellatio may significantly decrease the risk of breast cancer in women

NTY’s 10 Best Books Of 2007

From the NYT:

MAN GONE DOWN
By Michael Thomas. Black Cat/Grove/Atlantic, paper, $14. This first novel explores the fragmented personal histories behind four desperate days in a black writer’s life.

OUT STEALING HORSES
By Per Petterson. Translated by Anne Born. Graywolf Press, $22. In this short yet spacious Norwegian novel, an Oslo professional hopes to cure his loneliness with a plunge into solitude.

THE SAVAGE DETECTIVES
By Roberto Bolaño. Translated by Natasha Wimmer. Farrar, Straus & Giroux, $27. A craftily autobiographical novel about a band of literary guerrillas.

THEN WE CAME TO THE END
By Joshua Ferris. Little, Brown & Company, $23.99. Layoff notices fly in Ferris’s acidly funny first novel, set in a white-collar office in the wake of the dot-com debacle.

TREE OF SMOKE
By Denis Johnson. Farrar, Straus & Giroux, $27. The author of “Jesus’ Son” offers a soulful novel about the travails of a large cast of characters during the Vietnam War.

Nonfiction

IMPERIAL LIFE IN THE EMERALD CITY: Inside Iraq’s Green Zone.
By Rajiv Chandrasekaran. Alfred A. Knopf, $25.95; Vintage, paper, $14.95. The author, a Washington Post journalist, catalogs the arrogance and ineptitude that marked America’s governance of Iraq.

LITTLE HEATHENS: Hard Times and High Spirits on an Iowa Farm During the Great Depression.
By Mildred Armstrong Kalish. Bantam Books, $22. Kalish’s soaring love for her childhood memories saturates this memoir, which coaxes the reader into joy, wonder and even envy.

THE NINE: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court.
By Jeffrey Toobin. Doubleday, $27.95. An erudite outsider’s account of the cloistered court’s inner workings.

THE ORDEAL OF ELIZABETH MARSH: A Woman in World History.
By Linda Colley. Pantheon Books, $27.50. Colley tracks the “compulsively itinerant” Marsh across the 18th century and several continents.

THE REST IS NOISE: Listening to the Twentieth Century.
By Alex Ross. Farrar, Straus & Giroux, $30. In his own feat of orchestration, The New Yorker’s music critic presents a history of the last century as refracted through its classical music.

Posted in Book Reviews | Comments Off on NTY’s 10 Best Books Of 2007

‘Bernard Malamud: A Writer

Lee Siegel writes in the New York Times:

Malamud didn’t need to copulate his way to freedom from Mommy. As a little boy, he had saved his own mother from a suicide attempt; she spent the next two years in an insane asylum, where she died in 1929. Later he watched his schizophrenic brother drift from one mental institution to another. Malamud’s fatal impulse, as Davis poignantly shows, was to try to recover his mother — and perhaps his brother too — through the love of women. According to this sympathetic biographer, Malamud’s Christian wife painfully tolerated his unfaithfulness, though she was not above responding with an occasional despairing infidelity of her own.

…Like an embarrasing old uncle, Malamud is barely referred to these days. On those few occasions when he is publicly admired, tribute usually comes in the form of sentimental commentary from younger, self-consciously Jewish writers, whose parochial picture of Malamud ironically confirms the denigrating comments Roth made a generation ago. Far more frequently, however, you find critics celebrating Bellow and Roth, above all, for their intelligence, and never mentioning Malamud. And indeed, instinct, not intelligence, is what is most salient in Malamud’s work. His writing struggles with the permanence of irrational forces and the necessity of arriving at some kind of reckoning with them. For Malamud, the obligation to be moral isn’t rational. It occurs all of a sudden, sprung from within. For Malamud, the rational justification of morality is, on the contrary, often the stuff of moral vanity and outrageous hypocrisy. From feeling, a Malamud character might say, you don’t escape.

Posted in Jewish Literature | Comments Off on ‘Bernard Malamud: A Writer

The Immigration Solution: A Better Plan Than Today’s

The David Horowitz Freedom Center emails:

Please join us on Tuesday, January 15, 2008 to hear Heather Mac Donald discuss the book, The Immigration Solution: A Better Plan Than Today’s which she co-authored with Victor Davis Hanson and Steven Malanga.

Registration and the reception begin at 7:00 p.m. at the Luxe Hotel located at 11461 Sunset Boulevard, LA, CA 90049. Ms. MacDonald will begin her talk at 7:30 p.m. with book signing to follow.

Undoubtedly the United States needs a liberal and welcoming immigration policy, geared to the needs and interests of the nation. In this urgent new book, three astute observers argue that we have lost control of our southern border, so that the vast majority of our immigrants are now illegal Mexicans. Poor, uneducated, and unskilled, these newcomers add much less to the national wealth than they cost the taxpayers for their health care, the education of their children, and (too often) their incarceration. The Immigration Solution proposes a policy that admits skilled and educated people on the basis of what they can do for the country, not what the country can do for them.

"The Immigration Solution is not just another book about the catastrophe caused by millions of illegal aliens flooding our country; it is a call to arms combined with an outline for a sensible immigration policy. If every member of Congress would read this book, we might be able to begin the process of securing our borders and reducing the number of illegal immigrants within them." Congressman Tom Tancredo

Zato Ici writes on Amazon.com about this new book:

Absolutely first rate. This is a collection of essays from three authors. In a trim 183 pages they cover economics, education, health care, effects on society, and much more. Its strength is the descriptive prose of its authors. Great background reading for anyone whose state or community is grappling with changing its laws to adjust for the presence of many illegal immigrants.

Author Malanga gives a broad historical view. Heather Mac Donald, the volume’s prime contributor, offers lively descriptions with highly fascinating details of topics like schools, gangs, and the actions of Mexican diplomats. Professor Hanson describes how his neighborhood has changed in recent years, offering telling incidents from his personal experience.

The title’s "Solution" is a tad misleading. You are five pages from the end when you move from description of the problem on to an outline of a solution. But in admirable style, Malanga zips out a series of practical measures.

Occasionally one wishes for tighter editing. "This year" on p. 54 refers to 2006. A reference to the Hagel-Martinez Senate bill on p. 63 probably needed no elaboration when it was written. Today it leads to one to a distracting diversion into the dustbin of recent amnesty attempts.

The authors deserve high praise for covering the topic from a holistic view, for avoiding the hysterical focus on the border of activists with a narrow view, and for raising concerns without fear mongering. Five stars.

Posted in David Horowitz, Immigration | Comments Off on The Immigration Solution: A Better Plan Than Today’s