Cautious Asian Drivers

I was driving down the road in the middle lane when this van in front of me stopped. About 400 yards ahead, two fire engines were pulled over to the side beside a nursing home. Impatient, I turned left into the next lane and continued on with my journey. As I passed the stopped van, I looked in and saw an Asian driver. As I moved on, the driver slowly got going and followed me cautiously.

Why are Asians such cautious drivers? I think I understand now that I’ve read J. Philippe Rushton’s classic, Race, Evolution and Behavior:

Noncognitive personal qualities were likely selected along with intelligence, either as a necessary concomitant feature or because additional advantages were conferred. In the most ^-selected populations there would not only be increased brain size and intelligence, but also a reduction in personal and sexual competitiveness including the size of breasts, buttocks, and male genitalia. Decreased emphasis on personal and sexual competitiveness and more emphasis on parenting and personal restraint would allow greater complexity of social organization and increment the number of children successfully raised to reproductive maturity.

K-strategy populations generate centralized social systems with regulated communication networks in which individuals initially compete for position but subsequently gain access to resources dependent on their place in the hierarchy. Less K-strategy populations generate relatively less centralized organizations in which the important lines of communication are face-to-face and in which personal dominance matters, because each time resources become available they are competed for anew, in an opportunistic scrambling fashion.

In other words, Asians tend to be more cautious and thoughtful than whites and other groups in all sorts of life decisions such as sex.

This morning, when I was parking my car, I noticed somebody wanting to fit into the space behind me, so I moved up a couple of feet to make this easier for them. When I got out of my car, the Japanese driver behind me got out and gave me a genuine thank you.

I like walking around a Japanese neighborhood. It has little crime and everyone is polite. Their homes and yards are well maintained.

The LA Times reports: “Puzzling silence after woman’s fatal beating Witnesses who watched Kim Pham being kicked to death outside a Santa Ana club are clamming up rather than cooperating with police.”

It’s not so puzzling. Asians tend to be cautious and so they’re less likely to talk to the police and to get into controversies and lawsuits. This is also part of the tribal mentality — keep quiet and keep things within the group.

According to Rushton: “The problem of interracial violence is overwhelmingly one of black assaults on whites. While more than 97 percent of white criminals victimize white people, up to 67 percent of black criminals also victimize white people. According to U.S. Department of Justice statistics for 1987, 200 million whites committed 87,029 violent assaults on blacks while nearly 30 million blacks committed 786,660 violent attacks on whites. This averages out to 1 out of every 38 blacks violently assaulting a white in one year, and only 1 out of every 2,298 whites assaulting a black. The black criminals preference for white victims is at least 60 times that of the white criminals preference for black victims.”

Posted in Asians, Blacks, Race | Comments Off on Cautious Asian Drivers

Has The ADL Been The Model For Fighting Racism?

Has the Anti-Defamation League‘s success in identifying and stigmatizing anti-Semitism been the model that America and the West have followed in identifying and destroying racism and those that espouse it?

In other words, following the Holocaust, have Jews led the way in the West in forbidding public discourse that notices and comments critically upon group differences? Has the Museum of Tolerance over the past 20 years outdone the ADL?

The ADL has gone after “powerless and impotent” anti-Semites for little reason other than to intimidate and to make criticism of Jews as a group off-limits to criticism from non-Jews. In 1994, the ADL got into in a neighbors dispute in Denver and was successfully sued for defamation.

The ADL has encouraged Jews to report anything they thought was anti-Semitism and in response, the ADL, if it took the reports seriously, would publicize the offense and get politicians to condemn it and file lawsuits and do anything they could to stop anti-Semitism before it hurt Jews. Politicians were happy to play along because it made them immune to trouble from like-minded organizations, it made them look like civil rights supporters, and who could be opposed to that? Other groups took note of the ADL’s success and encouraged their members to feel like victims and to protest against any perceived injustice and to march and to boycott when necessary. They weren’t usually as successful as the Jews because they weren’t Jewish (aka smart and competent), but they’ve still created an America where you can’t publicly criticize any group but white Christians without getting condemned for bigotry and having your life and career ruined. Some groups, such as gays, are more powerful and competent at punishing enemies than others but no group is more powerful and competent at ending careers for criticizing them than Jews.

The ADL has many positions that seem to have nothing to do with fighting bigotry. For instance, “The ADL supports Comprehensive and DREAM Act legislation that would provide conditional permanent residency to certain illegal aliens of good moral character who graduate from U.S. high schools, arrived in the United States as minors, and lived in the country continuously for at least five years prior to the bill’s enactment.” (Wikipedia)

In short, the ADL, a secular leftist organization, pursues what it believes are the Jews’ group interests (cloaked in a crusade against bigotry) and these interests include multi-culturalism for America as well as keeping Christianity, gun ownership and the right-wing on a tight leash.

Posted in ADL, Jews, Race | Comments Off on Has The ADL Been The Model For Fighting Racism?

Hank – Five Years From The Brink

I was watching this 2013 documentary on former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulsen. I was struck by his hoarse voice and immediately thought that the guy suffered from unnecessary body tension and this stressed and damaged his vocal chords.

Early on in the film, Hank says: “I’m a sloucher.” Pulling down is going to hurt the quality of your voice. Unnecessary tension anywhere in your body is going to hurt your voice.

“I do a lot of things well, but relax isn’t one of them,” Hank says. You can tell that in his voice.

Hank’s wife Wendy says: “Hank’s intense.” That intensity when it manifests as unnecessary body tension is going to cause you a lot of physical, emotional and mental problems.

Hank: “We always joke about the fact that I can’t read anything with expression. If you heard me read a speech, you would know it wasn’t a pleasant thing. I would read with a monotone. I would race through these books [with the kids] in a monotone and Wendy came in once and said, ‘Slow down. Read with expression.’ As soon as I did that, both kids started to cry. They said, ‘No! Read like a daddy, not like a mommy.'”

Hank talks about a key meeting during the 2008 financial crisis. “Getting near midnight, I had a problem cover over me. All of my life when I get really exhausted, I get the dry heaves. And it sounds like I’m really sick because I make a lot of noise.”

Wendy laughs: “Everybody asks. I forget, dry heaves, I think he calls it that.”

Hank: “I would play tennis with Wendy. If I was in the hot sun and so on… A couple of times, our opponents would think it was a tactic, and I’d go over and have the dry heaves and she’d say, ‘Hank, get back out here. That’s disgusting.’.”

Wendy: “I would totally discount it. People would get very undone about it and I’d say, ‘Forget it. That’s just Hank.’ I discount them completely. I know he’s had them before.”

Hank: “Rahm Emmanuel and Harry Reid came over and offered to get a doctor.”

Why does Hank Paulsen get dry heaves under stress? It’s related to his slumping, tension and hoarse voice. He’s using himself poorly. He has way too much tension in his body, way too much compression, and he makes himself sick.

I blogged about this Sept. 1, 2009:

“Do you have any thoughts on stomach aches?” I ask my Alexander Technique teacher today.
“When do you get them?” he asks.
“When I start worrying. I find myself clenching.”
“Well, what would you say to a friend with this problem?”
“I don’t know.”
“You’d say that you’re probably moving down when it happens, pushing your stomach down, playing a loop of worrying thoughts, and you’re probably tipping your head back. So the solution is to flow up. You’re too smart of a guy for this. You know this.
“Why do people throw up when under stress? Because they push down, they tip their head back, they catastrophize and the bile flows up.”

Posted in Alexander Technique | Comments Off on Hank – Five Years From The Brink

The Wolf of Wall Street

I recently saw the movie The Wolf of Wall Street (about the Jew Jordan Belfort and many of his Jewish friends) and was also just watching this PBS Frontline program, To Catch A Trader, about finding insider trading on Wall Street, and I thought this program could be called, “To Catch A Jew.” There were an awful lot of Jewish names who appeared to be doing shady things in this show. There were also an awful lot of Indians doing shady things. And one Taiwanese lady doing shady things.

When I read about wrongdoing on Wall Street, I notice a lot of Jews and Indians getting busted.

I’m not an expert on Wall Street, but I have this supposition that any trader who consistently makes big money trading stocks is doing it with inside information. I also have a sneaking supposition that when it comes to dealing in the most adventurous financial instruments, that middlemen minorities (who may feel more loyalty to each other rather than the wider state) play a disproportionate role. So I’m wondering what’s going on.

Part of it, I think, is that minority groups may feel more free to innovate and to take risks in ways that majority groups regard as too dangerous for their precious country. Sometimes this innovation is a great thing and sometimes it is a disaster.

People with whopping high IQs dominate trading on Wall Street, and Ashkenasi Jews have high average IQs. Additionally, Jews out-perform their high IQs (while Latin Americans, for instance, consistently under-perform — both in work and in education — their IQs).

I grew up a WASP (where if anybody in my community had done this sort of bad behavior, people would have been appalled, we Seventh-Day Adventists just didn’t act this way) and then I converted to Judaism. The WASP way and the Jewish way of doing things is different. Neither one is inherently superior to the other. They are different hero systems.

In my upbringing, sex, money, power and prestige were not things you were supposed to talk about in polite company. By contrast, Jews and Judaism have more peace with discussing the natural passions.

For instance, let’s talk about bribery. In my WASP upbringing, bribery was a horrible thing and there was never a reason for it. By contrast, persecuted minority groups such as Jews have often needed to use bribery to stay alive and to rescue their fellows who had been kidnapped and held for ransom.

Now let’s talk about insider trading. I suspect that virtually all big money made in stock trading is done with insider information. While Jewish law holds that a Jew should obey the laws of the land where he resides, this means the law as practiced, not necessarily the law on the books. Law enforcement must be selective in which examples of insider trading it prosecutes. Law isn’t just law on the books. It is also law as practiced. If the speed limit says 55mph and the traffic is going at 70mph, a Jew is allowed to drive at 70mph according to Jewish law. So too on Wall Street, if certain levels of insider trading are the accepted way business is done and it is universally practiced, then a Jew is allowed to do that.

By contrast, I kept hearing as a Seventh-Day Adventist, “Just because everybody is doing it doesn’t make it right.” There was great emphasis on obeying the law of the land.

Tribal identity differs from majority citizen identity. For some members of a tribe, be they Nigerians or Jews or Indians or Japanese-Americans, their primary group identity is tribal. On the other hand, most Jews in America are more loyal to America than they are to Israel or to Jewish causes.

While WASPs may have their primary group identity as Baptists or Seventh-Day Adventists or Methodists, there’s very little in their thinking that it is ok to cheat outsiders. Members of tribes by contrasts, are likely immigrants or the children of immigrants, and some learned to survive over the centuries by working the system, usually a corrupt discriminatory system. For instance, under communism or under the czar, it may have been good and right to cheat the system because they were dealing with a corrupt system. This way of thinking does not always disappear when you move to a new country worthy of your allegiance.

Down through history, there were a lot of professions regarded as grubby that were relegated to Jews such as money lending. Some Jews became somewhat inured to doing society’s dirty work. Dirty work today might be something like being a defense lawyer or mob lawyer. In WASP society, you’d likely be shunned if you primarily made your living defending murderers and mobsters, but there’s much less shunning for that sort of thing in Jewish or Armenian life. So long as you give generously to tribal causes, you’re not given a lot of grief for how you earn your living.

I have a Jewish acquaintance who grew up Orthodox in New York and New Jersey and he tells me that most of the people running his shul were convicted of various white collar crimes. On the other hand, I know a guy who was a drug dealer in college and then he became a ba’al teshuva (an Orthodox Jew) but he grew disillusioned that he was never accepted in Los Angeles Orthodoxy — despite his donations — because of his drug and financial shenanigans. Modern Orthodox Jews, who dominate the professions, tend to have the strictest ethical standards of the various Jewish denominations.

A Jewish friend emails me: “Dude, you know better than I do that Christian religious disposition toward money is way different from the Jewish one. Christianity addresses with predominantly moral concerns from a universal perspective. It’s an unusual tradition in that way. Judaism (and Islam, and every minority religious tradition in most of the world) addresses finance mostly from a pragmatic point of view, with morality a secondary concern and with different standards depending on whether you’re dealing with Jews or non-Jews. Even most secular Jews with no knowledge or experience of Judaism have inherited some of this, both culturally and almost certainly to some extent genetically.”

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Crime, Jews | Comments Off on The Wolf of Wall Street

Netflix’s Mitt Documentary

What struck me in this movie was Mitt Romney’s dedication to picking up trash. Just before his first debate, he was picking up trash outside his hotel room. On election night, he was picking up trash around the room. Somehow I don’t think Barack Obama spent much time picking up trash.

Those values of cleanliness and concern for others are not evenly distributed around the world. When I went to Israel, I was struck by how trash was strewn around, though in the Ashkenazi strongholds, there wasn’t much trash.

Picking up trash is an important value and not everyone has it. After Tea Party rallies, for instance, there’s little trash left, while after Occupy Wall Street rallies, there’s massive filth.

Posted in Mitt Romney | Comments Off on Netflix’s Mitt Documentary

Richard Sherman Is No Rhodes Scholar

I enjoyed the performance of Richard Sherman on Sunday after the game. I enjoy his trash talking. He entertains me. I respect that he went to Stanford. I don’t think the guy is ignorant. But if you are going to talk smack on TV after a game, you better be prepared for smack to be spoken back at you. Richard Sherman sounded like a thug on Sunday, which is just how football players should sound. They should be scary guys. They have a scary job.

Alexander Hart writes:

Sherman’s 1400/990 on the SATs is below the average test taker score, normed at 1000 in 2006. And it is nearly 3 standard deviations below the average Stanford SAT of 2215, new style.

What about graduating second in his class in high school? Sherman attended Dominguez High School in Compton, which is 13% black, 83% Hispanic, 1% Asian, and 0.1% white. A grand total of 6.3 % of students are proficient in Math and 27.5% are proficient in English. Being valedictorian or salutatorian in these circumstances may mean painfully little.

Elite schools like Stanford do not take average students. According to CollegeConfidential.com, in 2005, Stanford accepted less than 1% of students who had below a 500 on Reading and just 1% had below a 500 on Math. (I could not find the statistics for the combined score for 2005, and the next year the SATs changed their scoring system. However, it is a fair assumption that the students who managed to get in with below a 500 math score likely did much better on verbal, and vice versa. Thus even with affirmative action, there’s no way Stanford would have accepted Sherman, but for his football abilities.)

However, the NFL has all incoming players take the Wonderlic test, which is a very accurate proxy for IQ. Sherman scored a 24, which is equivalent to a 108 IQ. That’s a standard deviation and a half higher than your average black, and smarter than your average white American.

But it’s lower than the average for the predominantly white positions of center, quarterback, and lineman. It’s far below Peyton Manning’s 28 (116 IQ), Tom Brady’s 33 (126 IQ), or Eli Manning’s 38.5 (137 IQ).

More importantly, it’s below the 115 IQ that, just a few decades ago, was viewed as necessary to attend college—much less an elite university like Stanford.

So Richard Sherman is no doofus. But he’s not as exceptional as he’s made out to be.

Posted in Football | Comments Off on Richard Sherman Is No Rhodes Scholar

National Review Parts Way With Mark Steyn

The final fatal difference was in the conduct of their legal defense against climate scientist Michael Mann.

I’ve rarely read National Review over the past six months (the Weekly Standard even less). I prefer Steve Sailer and VDare.com.

The National Review was at its best under editor John O’Sullivan and has steadily declined under lightweight Rich Lowry.

My favorite newspaper is the New York Times. The Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times also do good work.

Posted in National Review | Comments Off on National Review Parts Way With Mark Steyn

The White Identity Movement And The Jews

About 95% of American Jews are Ashkenazi and about 95% of American Jews identify as white. Jews overwhelmingly prefer whites to other races and they overwhelmingly prefer to live in white neighborhoods.

Orthodox Jews are far more likely than white non-Jews to have no problem with white identity politics, while non-Orthodox Jews overwhelmingly despise white identity politics, just like most white non-Jews in America.

Steve Sailer writes for VDARE:

Many Jews have strong reasons for their aversion to white identity politics, either irrational (the Cossacks are coming!) or rational (what’s in it for me?).

Perhaps Taylor can persuade enough Jews to get onboard to make white identity respectable in the MSM and thus with the media’s consumers, the public. He’s striven manfully and graciously over the years to make Jews feel welcome in his movement and many Jews have written for American Renaissance.

Recall that neoconservatism emerged in the late 1960s, largely due to Jewish shopkeepers’ fear of black crime and Jewish civil servants’ fear of being fired by black politicians. Brilliant Jewish intellectuals like Nathan Glazer and Norman Podhoretz took their relatives’ complaints seriously.

Still, over time, Jews mostly figured out it was simply easier to move away from blacks and get better jobs where they didn’t have to deal with many blacks. Let other whites deal with them.

Thus Commentary lost interest in complaining about quotas, and neoconservatism morphed into mostly being an Israel Fan Club.

The fundamental question for 21st Century white identity politics is the same as for Armenians, just two or three orders of magnitude greater in media influence: What’s in it for Jews?

Posted in Jews, Steve Sailer | Comments Off on The White Identity Movement And The Jews

The Advantages of Skype Alexander Technique Lessons

Monika Gross tells Robert Rickover: “I wanted to teach people in a way that wouldn’t increase their stress. People have less money and less time (at least in their perception).”

“People spend so much time in front of their computers. Wouldn’t it be interesting to devise an intervention that makes them alert while dealing with this device?”

“Rather than saying I’m giving up the beautiful skill of touch in teaching, I’m saying, maybe I can give you some Alexander principles via Skype so that when you can come in person, you will. You’ll find time to do it because you’ve found inhibition.”

“An advantage of Skype is that people feel your presence in real time. You are still creating a bond with your student of caring, compassion and attention. That’s something most people don’t have access to a lot of the time. That’s one reason they relish having an Alexander lesson. I can’t touch them through the computer, but I can allow them to begin to understand that what they’re learning is something they already have. It is not something I am doing to them or fixing them or adjusting them or manipulating them. That’s not what we do as teachers but it is something in the early lessons that the student perceives we are doing.”

“I have made quicker progress with some of my Skype students of losing a perceived dependency on me as the teacher, the magic hands, come and fix me, I need this…”

“When my daughter learned to walk, I encouraged her but I didn’t hold her.”

Robert: “There’s something very clean about it. It’s clear that you are teaching. People on Skype are much more likely to experiment between sessions.”

“For most of my in-person students, it takes them a while to realize that I am not going to fix them.”

Monika: “When you’re giving a Skype lesson, it’s usually in a person’s home or office. Occasionally I’ve done Skype lessons when somebody is at a golf course and at a track. When you have a lesson in your habitual environment, it becomes marked by the perceptual changes you had during your lesson. Being in your space becomes a mnemonic device that wakes you up.”

“They come to associate a change in use when doing email.”

Robert: “You can work with someone as they process their email.”

Monika: “The plasticity of the brain is imprinting the experience in their home or office.”

There are some students who don’t want to be touched, so Skype is ideal.

F.M. Alexander tried to teach people through letters.

Monika: “We need to be able to teach Alexander Technique principles through a broad spectrum of media and pedagogy.”

Posted in Alexander Technique | Comments Off on The Advantages of Skype Alexander Technique Lessons

What Is Race Realism?

According to Wikipedia:

Scientific racism is the use of purportedly scientific techniques and hypotheses to support or justify the belief in racism, racial inferiority, or racial superiority, or alternatively the practice of classifying individuals of different phenotypes into discrete races.[1][2][3] According to the United Nations convention, superiority based on racial differentiation is scientifically false, morally condemnable, socially unjust and dangerous, and there is no justification for racial discrimination, in theory or in practice, anywhere.[4]

As a category of theory, scientific racism employs anthropology (notably physical anthropology), anthropometry, craniometry, and other disciplines, in proposing anthropologic typologies supporting the classification of human populations into physically discrete human races that are asserted to be superior or inferior. Scientific racism was common during the New Imperialism period (c. 1880s – 1914) where it was used in justifying White European imperialism, and in it culminated in the period from 1920 to the end of World War 2 when it was finally considered discredited. Since the later 20th century, scientific racism has been criticized as obsolete and as historically used to support or validate racist world-views, based upon belief in the existence and significance of racial categories and a hierarchy of superior and inferior races.[5]

After the end of the Second World War (1939–45) and the occurrence of the Holocaust, scientific racism in theory and action was formally denounced, especially in UNESCO‘s antiracist statement “The Race Question” (1950): “The biological fact of race and the myth of ‘race’ should be distinguished. For all practical social purposes ‘race’ is not so much a biological phenomenon as a social myth. The myth of ‘race’ has created an enormous amount of human and social damage. In recent years, it has taken a heavy toll in human lives, and caused untold suffering.”[6] Today, scientific racism is often characterized as a pseudoscience.[2][3]

The term scientific racism is pejorative as applied to modern theories, as in The Bell Curve (1994), which investigated racial differences in IQ, concluding that genetics explained at least part of the IQ differences between races. Critics argue that such works are motivated by racist presumptions unsupported by available evidence. Publications such as the Mankind Quarterly, founded as an explicitly “race-conscious” publication, have been accused of scientific racism for publishing articles on controversial interpretations of human evolution, intelligence, ethnography, language, mythology, archaeology, and race subjects.[7] The pejorative label, “scientific racism”, criticizes studies claiming to establish a connection between, for example, race and intelligence, and argues that this promotes the idea of “superior” and “inferior” human races…[8]

Today, the term “scientific racism” is used to refer to research seeming to scientifically justify racist ideology. The accusation of scientific racism often is cast upon researchers claiming the existence of quantifiable differences in intelligence among the human races, especially if said differences are partly genetic in origin. Contemporary researchers include Arthur Jensen (The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability); J. Philippe Rushton, president of the Pioneer Fund (Race, Evolution, and Behavior); Chris Brand (The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications); Richard Lynn (IQ and the Wealth of Nations); Charles Murray; and Richard Herrnstein (The Bell Curve), among others.[98] These authors themselves, while seeing their work as scientific, may dispute the term “racism” and may prefer terms such as “race realism” or “racialism“.

Posted in Race | Comments Off on What Is Race Realism?