Does Cultural Nationalism Work?

Can you weld a united and cohesive nation-state consisting of many different races and religions? Does cultural nationalism work? It is so much more acceptable to the current zeitgeist than racial nationalism but from where I stand, it seems that people act pretty much in line with their ancestors aka their genetics. Japanese-Americans act like other Japanese around the world (high parental investment in their kids, low rates of crime, high educational and professional success, etc), Mexican-Americans act Mexican (high crime rates, low educational and economic achievement, etc), blacks act black (high crime rates, low educational and economic achievement, etc), Persians act Persian, Germans act German, Swedes act Swedish, Jews act Jewish, etc.

* “What attachment can a poor European emigrant have for a country where he had nothing? The knowledge of the language, the love of a few kindred as poor as himself, were the only cords that tied him: his country is now that which gives him land, bread, protection, and consequence: Ubi panis ibi patria [where there is bread, there is one’s fatherland, is the motto of all emigrants. What then is the American, this new man? He is either an European, or the descendant of an European, hence that strange mixture of blood, which you will find in no other country. I could point out to you a family whose grandfather was an Englishman, whose wife was Dutch, whose son married a French woman, and whose present four sons have now four wives of different nations. He is an American, who leaving behind him all his ancient prejudices and manners, receives new ones from the new mode of life he has embraced, the new government he obeys, and the new rank he holds.”

–From “Letters from an American Farmer,” J. Hector St. John Crevecoer, 1782

Posted in Culture | Comments Off on Does Cultural Nationalism Work?

The Puritans Were Forerunners Of The Seventh-Day Adventists

When I read up on the Puritans, it reminds me of how I was raised as a Seventh-Day Adventist in Australia and California.

I think I have a fair idea of the strengths and weaknesses of Anglos vs Jews. Both groups take good care of their own. Jews tend to be more flexible in their ethics, more creative, and place more emphasis on socio-economic success. Jews do better in business. Jews tend to be higher achievers, more groundbreaking, innovative, transgressive, and experimental.

The Seventh-Day Adventist clergy I knew growing up tended to be more honest than the rabbis I’ve known but not nearly as smart. Seventh-Day Adventists I knew never boasted about cheating on taxes, business, customs and the like while many Jews I’ve known do make such boasts. Lying is a big sin in Adventism. Truth has an instrumental value in Judaism. If presenting a moving story as true when you know it isn’t, that’s OK for rabbis if they think it will inspire Jews to greater observance of Torah. A typical Seventh-Day Adventist pastor would shy away from that.

Adventists strike me as simple, caring, nurturing people (who love to argue about theology) while Jews are complicated, contradictory and confusing (with no interest in arguing about theology). Jews strike me as more realistic about how the world works and they have fewer hang-ups regarding frank talk about and the natural passions such as the pursuit of sex, money, power, and fame.

On average, Jews are about a standard deviation smarter than Adventists.

If every Adventist in the world disappeared today, the world would be largely unchanged. If all Jews disappeared, the world would be unrecognizable.

Jews tend to be more expressive of their emotions. Adventists tend to be nice and controlled. Both groups venerate education, but Jews more so. Money plays a bigger role in Jewish life than in Adventist life. The more traditional the form of Judaism, the more hierarchical.

Posted in Adventist, Jews, WASPs | Comments Off on The Puritans Were Forerunners Of The Seventh-Day Adventists

The Sopranos As Race Realism

I’m rewatching The Sopranos. I detect nothing PC in it. It seems race realist. I don’t detect any liberal Jewish propaganda. I don’t see any white bashing. What am I missing?

A Jewish friend replies: “You are missing nothing. It is as you say.”

Essay: In fact, in taking aim at the show’s treatment of ethnic minorities, Sopranos critics miss the mark entirely. Want to know which ethnic minority groups’ reputations the show does horribly deface? Jewish and African-Americans, that’s who.

Don’t believe me? The show is actually breathtaking in the audacity with which it portrays Jews as shifty, mercenary hucksters and blacks as simple-minded, petty criminals. The main Jewish character on the show is Herman “Hesh” Rabkin, who plays a loan shark in league with the Sopranos. Tony and his uncle Corrado both have Jewish lawyers who embody the stereotype of Jews as money-grubbing shysters. And the Sopranos constantly do business with archetypal “niggers” – ignorant, deadbeat and usually incompetent thieves, murderers and “street pharmacists” from the ghettoes of Trenton, Newark and Jersey City. When Tony and his fellows come into contact with blacks, it’s usually with carjackers and stick-up artists, muggers and cocaine addicts, not to mention the occasional gangsta rapper—racial caricatures as deeply offensive as any World War II propaganda cartoon and clownish minstrels that would turn Al Jolson green with envy.

Mafia movies, of course, have shat on racial minorities – mainly African-Americans – for decades now. Remember the Mafia Don convention in The Godfather, when one boss argued that the heroin trade should be restricted to “the dark peoples, the coloreds…they’re animals anyway, so let them lose their souls?” Or Sonny Corleone’s casual comment that “Niggers are having a good time with our policy banks up in Harlem, drivin’ them big new Cadillacs?” Or in Goodfellas, when Henry Hill told his wife, “Jail is for nigger stick-up men who don’t have their shit organized?” The Sopranos simply continues in this tradition. Witness Tony’s apoplexy upon seeing his daughter dating a half-Jewish, half-black fellow student – “Jamaal Ginsberg, the Hasidic homeboy,” as Tony called him – or his blaming an injury caused by a panic attack on a mugging by a gang of black men – or as he calls them, “fuckin’ jigaboo cocksuckin’ motherfuckers.” And crucially, this uniform hatred for the eternal nigger is not only shared by the actual mobsters in the show, but also frequently echoed by the legitimate Italian-American characters who share the screen with them.

BOSTON GLOBE MAY 11, 2004:

No television show is as provocative in dealing with race as “The Sopranos.”

That’s saying a lot, especially since the acclaimed HBO drama has never had any actors of color among its regular cast members. Yet throughout its five-season run, the disconnects, misunderstandings, and suspicions underlying this nation’s tinderbox racial dynamics have been as much a part of the series as mob violence and family acrimony.

In this week’s episode, Janice (Aida Turturro) was forced by her husband Bobby (Steven R. Schirripa) to attend anger management classes after she was arrested for assaulting a snippy parent at her stepdaughter’s soccer game. During her session, Janice at first presented herself as racially enlightened – she claims to have participated in the civil rights movement – then says the bitter result of her noble activism is the sight of black folks riding around in SUVs and blasting rap music.

It was almost a throwaway line, delivered as still more proof of Janice’s temper. And the black woman to whom the comment was directed confronted Janice, not about her casual prejudice, but her inability to control her anger and address its real source. Yet amid the evening’s beatings, excavation of several long-dead adversaries and jokes about Tony’s ever-expanding midsection it was another one of those little “Sopranos” moments revealing how bigoted thoughts or opinions are never far from the surface.

An even better example came in last week’s show, one of the best of the season. Among the various story lines — from Carmela’s futile attempts to find a divorce attorney to Vito’s apparent, and shockingly revealed, homosexuality — was a single thread running through the episode. Four characters — Tony (James Gandolfini), his cousin, Tony B. (Steve Buscemi), Meadow (Jaime-Lynn Discala) and Vito (Joseph Gannascoli) — blame various crimes on black men.

In each instance, a different term is used:

Tony B. claims his limp was the result of a mugging by “black guys.” Vito drops an N-bomb to describe the phony assailants in a concocted story about another mobster’s vicious beating at a construction site. Meadow tells her boyfriend that her former paramour, Jackie Jr., was murdered by “African-American” drug dealers. And Tony continues to tell everyone that he missed a big heist — the one that sent his cousin Tony B. to prison for more than a decade — because he was jumped and beaten by “jigaboos,” who stole his shoes and split his head open. (The episode’s title was “Unidentified Black Males.”)

Each mention conjured age-old images of black bogeymen, faceless and dangerous, lurking around every corner, and in every shadow, waiting to do damage to unsuspecting white folks.

Posted in Blacks, Italy, Jews, Race | Comments Off on The Sopranos As Race Realism

Steve Sailer: ‘A sense of rhythm appears to be uncorrelated with IQ’

Steve Sailer writes:

A reader calls my attention to Real Clear Science:

A Chimpanzee Has Rattled Off a Drum Solo
By Ross Pomeroy

Barney was a fairly normal chimpanzee. A 24-year-old, low-ranking member of a group of five adult male chimpanzees raised at the Biomedical Primate Research Centre in the Netherlands, he generally showed stereotypical behaviors: he played, he banged bottles, he climbed trees. Then, one January day, he walked away from his group and sat down outside, placing an upturned bucket between his feet. He then rattled off the only-known spontaneous, unsolicited chimpanzee drum solo. Primatologists at the center were taken completely by surprise. With no camera nearby, they recorded the five-minute performance with a simple voice recorder.

One of the findings of psychometrics among humans is that almost all cognitive skills are positively correlated. One big exception to the the g Factor model, however, is that a sense of rhythm appears to be uncorrelated with IQ. And that’s why there are so many Drummer Jokes (these are Dave Grohl’s favorites).

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: ‘A sense of rhythm appears to be uncorrelated with IQ’

Dr. Johnson’s reproof to Boswell: “Don’t cant in defence of savages.”

John Derbyshire writes:

If a white guy tells you he has conversations with plants, you should turn away in embarrassment. If Bob Randall tells you he heard the oak trees muttering, you should bow your head reverently.

After his death, in keeping with custom, his name and picture were removed from the Kanyini website “until sorry business is finished.” Like all flesh, he had been and gone: leaving much more than others, but still a fleeting footfall in the life of his ever-abiding mother, the red Earth.

Now, the trauma that primitive peoples suffered on encounter with civilization was very great. It was in many places a ghastly human tragedy, well documented in books like Alan Moorehead’s The Fatal Impact and Charles Mann’s 1491.

But that trauma was long over by the time Bob Randall was born in the 1930s. Australian governments of that time were struggling as humanely as they could with the very difficult question: How can a modern white-European nation assimilate a race of people displaying radically different statistical profiles on traits of behavior, intelligence, and personality?

They are struggling with it still. From a 2011 news report featuring the aforementioned Kevin Rudd:

Billions of dollars of spending on programmes to improve the lives of Australia’s Aborigines have failed to make any difference, with many stuck in the same hopeless situation they faced in the 1970s, a review commissioned by the government has found.

Australia spends an average of AU$3.5bn [the same in US$ at that time] each year on policies intended to improve indigenous health, education, housing and welfare, but was getting “dismal” results, the review concluded …

Australia’s 460,000 Aborigines make up about two per cent of the population.

They suffer higher rates of unemployment, substance abuse and domestic violence than other Australians and have an average life expectancy of 17 years less than the rest of the country.

Despite the glaring problems faced by indigenous Australians, policies devised by successive governments to build better housing, improve infrastructure and boost community safety have had little success.

The report, which was commissioned when Kevin Rudd was prime minister, took into account the progress of the government’s Northern Territory emergency intervention programme, brought in by John Howard in 2007 amid great controversy.

Under the plan, thousands of troops and police were sent into Outback Aboriginal communities to stamp out child abuse, alcoholism and domestic violence fuelled by “rivers of grog.” The policy is still in effect in several communities … [Billions spent on Australia’s Aborigines yield “dismal” results by Bonnie Malkin; Daily Telegraph, August 8, 2011.]

Whether there is any solution to this problem until our technology becomes capable of accurate genomic engineering, seems to me to be an open question.

In the meantime sensible people should prefer civilization to barbarism, mock the ethnomasochist fantasies of journalists suckled by the Walt Disney Company and educated under Cultural Marxism, and keep always in mind Dr. Johnson’s reproof to Boswell: “Don’t cant in defence of savages.”

Posted in Aborigines, Australia | Comments Off on Dr. Johnson’s reproof to Boswell: “Don’t cant in defence of savages.”

R. Shmuly Yanklowitz & Defanged Rabbis

The Jewish Libertarian writes:

He destroyed Rubashkin’s because he felt the workers there were being mistreated. So he shut the place down. He makes his living destroying things that he personally finds objectionable without a second thought about the consequences of his actions.

Did he ever do a follow up on the Rubashkin workers he put out of work? (I realize that if he did, I’m going to look pretty stupid, but I’m so confident he doesn’t care, because mission accomplished he shut down Rubashkin’s, that I’m putting myself on the line here.) Did he make sure they had work to replace their jobs? Did he ever give two shits about their future? I seriously doubt it. He “ended injustice” even though those workers chose to be there and could have quit at any time, but never chose to. And nobody else cares either. It’s not about the workers. It’s about a fake persona of “justice seeking”.

Shmuly goes from cause to cause, either funeling tax money (other people’s money) or destroying entire industries. He never creates a damn thing.

THE JEWISH LIBERTARIAN WRITES:

Shmuly is an incredibly ambitious man. There is no problem with being ambitious. It’s a good thing. The problem is when you use unjust laws, like the law against selling organs, to further your agenda of political force.

Now, please, imagine for a moment that selling organs on the free market were legal. If you wanted to sell your kidney to a dying man on dialysis, nobody would stop you. Women can sell their eggs already. There is no difference. Now, in that case, the supply of those willing to sell a kidney at whatever price agreed upon greatly exceeds those who need them. One could even theoretically contract people to sell their organs upon death with the money going to their heirs. Imagine the enormous amount of kidneys that would result from just that.

If that were the case, if people all over the world, destitute starving weak people, could sell a kidney for money voluntarily, then how much publicity do you think Shmuly Yanklowitz could get for donating a kidney?

The answer is ZERO. The price of kidneys would be low enough that whoever needs one would buy one immediately rather than wait for a donor at the risk of his life on dialysis.

If Shmuly donated in a world where there was a free market in kidneys, donating one would just be viewed as idiocy. There would be no need to do so.

But instead, in the world we live in, it is illegal to exchange a kidney for money. That DOES NOT mean that nothing is exchanged when someone donates a kidney. Shmuly gets a LOT out of donating a kidney. He gets publicity. He gets recognition. He gets reverence. He gets a following. He gets all that, and more. These are very valuable goods. This is VERY valuable to him personally, because he knows how to use all of these goods. To further his goals. To broaden his name. To further his own career.

In the same way that computer parts are only valuable to someone who knows how to put them together, so too publicity is only good for someone who knows how to use it. But it is a good nonetheless, just like money, only less marketable, and only marketable by publicity experts.

Am I saying it was not selfless of Shmuly to donate a kidney? It was certainly selfless, in a very shallow strictly monetary interpretation of selflessness. It was selfless only in the sense that he did not get actual money for the kidney. But he got other things, other goods, less marketable for others, but very marketable for him. He got a barter exchange – a kidney for publicity – instead of a monetary exchange – a kidney for money. Anyone can use money. Money is the most marketable good, by definition. But only very skilled people, like Shmuly, can use publicity. It is a very specific kind of economic good. He will take this publicity and exchange that for money instead to complete his barter, for donations to his causes, for better job opportunities as the Rabbi who donated a kidney, for further publicity advocating for violence against women and the poor, by outlawing voluntary employment relationships for women (equal work equal pay) and low-skilled workers (minimum wage).

But even then, it is not a moral problem to exchange publicity for a kidney. That’s perfectly fine and moral. What is IMMORAL, however, is to exchange publicity for a kidney when at the same time you advocate outlawing any monetary transactions for kidneys, thereby jacking up the value of the publicity you obtain from donating, and then using that to further your own goals at the expense of the starvation of others, who cannot legally sell their kidneys for money when they desperately need to do so.

Posted in R. Shmuly Yanklowitz | Comments Off on R. Shmuly Yanklowitz & Defanged Rabbis

Jewish Influence In The Media

Author and former Israel ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, tells the Jewish Journal:

And one of the issues I had to deal with was the fact that Jews were disproportionately represented in the US media. You just need to look at the op-ed pages. There is this anti-Semitic trope out here that ‘Jews control the media and that that’s why the media is pro-Israel’. They are disproportionately represented in the media, but the media isn’t necessarily pro-Israel…

Because Tikkun Olam, by nature, is a universalist notion. Zionism, Jewish peoplehood, is a particularistic notion. I put it in a very pedestrian way in the book – I say ‘if you have a hundred dollars, do you give it to Birthright, or do you give it to building a school in Guatemala?’ That’s the challenge of Tikkun Olam…

When I grew up and went to Hebrew school we never heard about Tikkun Olam. It’s in the Aleinu prayer, I know, but it’s originally a rather obscure medieval Kabalistic notion that has to do with the broken vessels and divine light of creation. It has been adapted to 21st century liberal American Jewish thought, to mean that our purpose in the world is to light the world’s injustices, make the world a better place. It’s a beautiful notion. But you have to reconcile it with the fact that we have Jewish peoplehood, and that we have a Jewish state to support…

…the other day I was sitting in the Knesset, and I went to a lobby meeting focused on educating Israelis about transgenderism. And sitting on the dais there were representatives from Meretz and Labor, but also from Likud, Israel Beitenu, all the different parties. So we’re having this discussion, and there were about a hundred kids in this room who are transgender, or transitioning, and there are two extraordinary things going on here: one is that this discussion is happening just a two hour drive from ISIS.

Posted in Israel, Jews | Comments Off on Jewish Influence In The Media

Too Smart For The Irish

Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff says: “I was in public school for one year. I was a wild kid. The teacher told my mother, “Your son is too bright for the Irish kids, the Italian kids. Send him to a [Jewish] day school.”

“If you have any sexual problems, don’t go into the rabbinate. Become an accountant. Work with numbers, not with human beings.”

New lecture:

* “Why do we have so many scandals?”

* “Since the day Moses Mendelsohn left the ghetto, we’ve struggled with the problem — how can we live as Jews in the big world and raise 98%, 99% of our children in our footsteps?”

“I grew up in an Irish/Italian/Jewish neighborhood. A third/a third/a third in the old Bronx. We had good relationships with the Irish until they got drunk. With the Italians, we had good relationships all the time. They had very good values like Jews as far as family, drinking, etc, but their Sunday was unbelievable. My next door neighbor went to church, he’s home within an hour, and he stretches out in front of the TV to watch football. There’s no concept of the Shabbat.”

* “You are not allowed to live in the United States today. If you have to live outside of Israel to make a living, the only country you would be allowed to live in is Putin’s Russia. Putin still believes in the Seven Noahide Laws. He’s against same-sex marriages. Give him credit. You’re living in America? How can a Jew live in a country that tramples the basic commandments of human existence [accepts same-sex marriage]?”

“In New York City, I could be arrested for speaking out against same-sex marriage.”

“What is western civilization? Man worships himself.”

* “Rabbis should be enjoined from counseling women one on one.”

Rav Aharon Lichtenstein went through Shas (Talmud) from 14-16 and never went through it again.”

* “I went to the Agudah convention and the shluchim (Chabad) convention and it was like a funeral and a wedding. For Agudah, it was no good, no good, no good…”

New lecture:

* “We want one people, not two people. If you go on living differently, ultimately it becomes two different Torot.”

New lecture:

* Reb Moshe Feinstein read the New York Times every day. Rabbi JB Solveitchik watched westerns on TV. Rav Aharon Lichtenstein loved to play Scrabble. The Rebbe said his daily tea with his wife was as important to him as putting on tefillin.

* “Messianism is a problem… Chabad had its problems. YU doesn’t have problems? We gave birth to Chovevei Torah. A letter from my student, the whole attitude towards homosexuals… 200 people signed that letter. I’ve been teaching Torah 56 years. You don’t think I had problems with kids with so-called homosexual tendencies. We got them help. I can think of four case. Three and half cases were totally solved. They’re grandparents now… Lakewood doesn’t have problems? Who would dream that graduates of Lakewood will probably die in jail. Bnai Brak just had a ponzi scheme. Hundreds of millions of dollars lost. Frum people.”

Posted in Irish, Italy, Jews, R. Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff | Comments Off on Too Smart For The Irish

Can Orangutans Exist With Humans?

A fair question is if various types of humans can live with each other in peace.

Report: The struggle between the various players is nuanced and complex, and, for outsiders, often difficult to understand. To local farmers and other people long residing in disputed lands, the enemy isn’t actually a wild animal, nor is it an environmental policy meant to protect those animals – but rather the policy’s impact on their livelihoods and lives. Biologists can count animals and estimate how much habitat they need to survive. International conservation organisations can press governments to set aside protected areas for wildlife. But with resources scarce and finite, the same wild animals so sacred to Western conservation can turn into targets for those forced to share less and less land, people in the far-flung corners of an empire who hold little of its money or decision-making power.

Posted in Apes, Race | Comments Off on Can Orangutans Exist With Humans?

R. Abraham Cooper: To defeat ISIS we must convince Twitter, YouTube to ‘unfriend’ terrorists

Rabbi Abraham Cooper writes:

Leveraging social network giants like Twitter and YouTube, the group paints a seductive picture of a heroic movement, sanctioned by Allah himself, to punish and expel the infidels.

ISIS, Al Shabab, Al Qaeda and their ilk have successfully recruited young potential fighters from across the Middle East, Europe and Asia and have used the Internet to lure teenage girls from the United Kingdom—urging them to swap their western lifestyles to join the struggle to establish a global Islamic Caliphate. They have also inspired and trained — online — lone wolf terrorists who are then convinced to murder and maim their neighbors in Western democracies.

Beyond killing or capturing their leaders, the burgeoning threats from ISIS and other terror groups will only subside if their online marketing capabilities are challenged and degraded.

Of course, proactive tweets and websites with positive messages about democracy and tolerance have a role to play in any campaign, but the key challenge is how to best disrupt the online food chain that feeds and abets terrorists.

At this stage the answer does not lie in more government legislation or intervention. No one wants more Big Brothers snooping in our lives.

What the world needs now are for the social networking giants like Twitter, YouTube, and Facebook to unfriend the terrorist enablers, recruiters, and teachers.

Teenagers in England shouldn’t so easily be able to communicate with a frontline ISIS fighter in Syria.

Muslim kids in France shouldn’t be circulating tweets celebrating the two Charlie Hebdo murderers as “heroes,” a mere two hours after the Islamist terrorists were gunned down by French police.

To date, Facebook has been the strongest in taking the lead against terrorists. Twitter has done the least.

How can online providers make a real difference? By doing the following:
– Publishing and adhering to transparent terms of usage.

– Permanently barring repeat offenders.

– Refusing service to groups that openly tout their affiliation with groups identified by the U.S. State Department as terrorists.

– Refusing to publish terrorist training manuals and videos online.

There are those who argue that such moves will only drive the evildoers underground. “Better to allow them to operate in the open, so that U.S. Homeland Security, MI5, German and French Intelligence can more easily track the activities”, they say. But such policies have only enabled Islamist extremists to impact more and more young Muslims around the corner — and around the world. Intelligence and law enforcement awareness that potential terrorists are out there did not stop the Charlie Hebdo Islamist murderers or extremists from Phoenix bent on shooting up an anti-Islamist gathering in Texas.

In recent months, I have met with senior intelligence and government officials in France, Germany, and in Asia. They fear more lone wolf attacks; they are already being forced to track more young extremists. They all say that to defeat terrorists’ online campaigns short of deploying privacy-killing, draconian “Big Brother” tactics, democracies need help from the ultimate experts in predictive behavior– not the CIA—but Google, YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook.

There are life and death issues at stake.

During a recent conference in Jerusalem, I heard a remarkable speech from a courageous moderate Muslim leader. Imam Hassen Chalghoumi is the President of the Conference of Imams in France. He is among the very few of 6,000 Imams in France who regularly denounces anti-Semitism. He chose to make his presentation excoriating Islamist extremism in Arabic — a noble, even heroic gesture. But at the end of stirring speech he suddenly switched to French and raised his fist in anger and frustration at the specter of his young constituents increasingly embracing religious extremism: “J’accuse, Twitter! J’accuse, YouTube!”

The Internet did not create hate or terrorism. But it is high time for the collective genius that has given society this powerful tool to help stop terrorists and bigots from hijacking the most powerful marketing and teaching tool the world has ever known before it’s too late.

I wonder what other speech he wants to restrict?

Posted in Censorship, Islam, R. Abraham Cooper | Comments Off on R. Abraham Cooper: To defeat ISIS we must convince Twitter, YouTube to ‘unfriend’ terrorists