Jews are a powerless people and they aren’t afraid to use it on anyone who says differently

Rabbi Abraham Cooper and Harold Brackman write:

…But what must they have thought looking down from Hebraic-Hellenic heaven in 2010 when Greek Orthodox Bishop Metropolitan Seraphim of Piraeus said on Greek television that Jews “control the international banking system,”…

No one will argue against the importance of helping the Greek people get through the crippling economic mess. But it is also time for the world community to hold to the fire the feet of Greece’s leaders in both priestly and parliamentary offices.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Greece | Comments Off on Jews are a powerless people and they aren’t afraid to use it on anyone who says differently

Steve Sailer: Ta-Nehisi Coates Finds His Body Fascinating, Is Sure Everybody Else Does, Too

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Ta is a pretty terrible writer, and I suspect he is thoroughly edited to get as readable as he is. To get a sense of Ta’s intellect, watch the bloggingheads he did with McWhorter. It’s really funny to watch McWhorter brutalize him verbally while Ta has that dazed-in-the-ring look that apparently never leaves him.

* I feel sorry for TN Coates as I believe he is suffering from PTSD after his childhood in a black neighborhood. PTSD explain his paranoia and distorted irrational world view such as his obsession with supposed “white violence” against “black bodies”.

I try to understand him, and the only case he can make is that america’s tendency of racial segregation force sensitive non violent black boys like him to live with violent blacks. I see it here in NY with the children of African immigrants who have to live in the Bronx as their parents are poor and can’t afford any other neighborhood. They were endlessly bullied by their classmates to turn “ghetto” (and to the dismay of their parents they do). To be poor and black in america is to be violent or to invite black violence.

Coates is bitter and angry because White people forced him to live with violent Blacks because they don’t want to live with Blacks.

* The quality of our white national opinion journalists is very low. The majority of them were supporters of the completely insane (and disastrous) Iraq War. They also have been huge supporters of free trade, immigration, financialization, ruinous levels of public spending, and other absurd policies.

“Iraq has weapons of mass destruction.”
“Wall-Street bankers are job creators.”
“Immigrants do jobs Americans won’t do.”
“We need a guest-worker program to alleviate worker shortages.”
“NAFTA created jobs.”
“Israel is our most loyal ally.”
“Obama threw Israel under the bust.”

When that constitutes the mainstream of American thinking, what does that say about our intelligentsia?

Coates deserves all the criticism directed at him, but the quality of his thought is not particularly bad in comparison to his fellow writers.

* John Derbyshire said it best:

For many American blacks, especially elite blacks like the Obamas, nothing exists outside their own blackness. Their blackness is endlessly interesting, endlessly fascinating to them. They can never get enough of thinking about it, talking about it, reading and writing about it.

If they write a book, it’s about their blackness: Barack Obama’s Dreams from My Father, for example. If they write a college paper, it’s about their blackness: Mrs Obama’s Princeton thesis, for example, the seven words of whose title contain the word “black” twice. If they read a book, it’s about blackness. I’ve spent many, many hours riding the New York subway. Sitting next to a black person who’s reading a book, I take a peek: two times out of three it’s some black author writing about blackness.

Black black blackety-blackety-black. It fills their consciousness and absorbs their attention. What on earth must it be like to so trapped like that, such a prisoner of your own skin? I can’t imagine. I guess, just as the T-shirt slogan says: It’s a black thing; I wouldn’t understand.

MORE COMMENTS TO STEVE SAILER:

* Blacks are framing things all wrong with this talk of “reparations”. What’s obvious is that after blacks get paid, say a year or two down the road, once all the money is blown, the same discussions will just recommence anew, in a never-ending cycle of bitch-festing.

On the other hand what many whites could buy into is the concept of alimony and divorce. For this to happen, the Malcolm X Society’s concept of an independent Republic of New Afrika (RNA) in the south of the US needs to be dusted off. Many, many whites would pay dearly to help blacks “move out” of the US and start their own country.

A few ground rules though. At least 80% of blacks would have to agree to relocate to the RNA. Once gone, there is no right to return although tourist visas are possible. Using the recent flood of African “refugees” to Europe as a lesson, obviously a real tall and secure border will need to be built. But this can be justified as a way to protect blacks from whites. Yes whites living in what will become the RNA will have to be cleared out although volunteers will be allowed to stay in the new black utopia. Progressives and SJW’s from the big cities will also be encouraged to relocate to the RNA; something tells me very few will answer this call. And for the blacks who decide to stay in the US they will have to swear an oath to stop bitching about race on the pain of being deported to the RNA in case they ever do start whining again.

The RNA would be independent and free from whitey. The RNA can have a central bank, its own currency (on the banknotes they could replace dead Presidents with retired cornerbacks for example). The US could agree to make generous payments for say 20 years to get the RNA up and running. After that though the RNA is on its own.

Surely once free from the oppressive jackboot of whitey, the RNA will be a prosperous country that in its turn will attract plenty of the world’s refugees.

* Why not institute your plan but make it Back to Africa? The president of Senegal said at the time of the Haitian earthquake, any Blacks who want to, can come back to Senegal and be given free land.

* American politics, and indeed the politics of America emulators such as Britain’s disgusting New Labour, are defined by one overriding animus and one overriding animus only. Which is an alliance of ‘oppressed’ minorities attacking and destroying white men.
Needless to say white women are major players in this enterprise, perhaps not providing the leadership, that’s a black thing for sure, but in terms of providing the sheer numbers.
In fact it’s the wish fulfillment of human evolutionary history’s deepest seated, strongest and most instinctually held grudge on behalf of white women – the final and ultimate triumph of the yoni over the phallus. As animal and elemental as the dawn of life itself.

With their joyous enthusiasm in allying themselves against white men and having the final, overall, epochal ‘victory’ in their sights, paradoxically, white women are making the biggest mistake ever.

* If RiRi thinks she can take my money, what little there is if it, she ought to put down the crack pipe. Maybe Chris Brown hit her upside the head too many times.

Yes, a spoiled, rich Black woman with a taste for thugs and a 85, being generous, IQ screaming at White America to hand over the money?

Trump just went up two points.

* Rihanna could have hired a couple of illegal Mexicans with criminal records to do the heavy lifting for her.

Considering how America’s black population has turned several formerly thriving white American cities into movie sets for the zombie apocalypse, I think blacks collectively owe the white population reparations for all the property values they have destroyed. We really should stop coddling and enabling these people.

* To me in a sane society really requires only five or six key attributes
a) there are borders
b) the successful majority race\civilization does not pander to any minority, much less a civilizationally disfunctional and more primitive one
c) men and women are understood to be different and being wives and mothers is the most important thing women do
d) having children and passing on our genes and culture is the most important activity society needs to make work; and we want the best, smartest, healthiest men and women to be doing it, and the incompetent not to be doing it
e) we value and celebrate the productive, righteous and decent, and don’t hold up, rent-seeking, rip-offs nor the disordered and depraved for anything but disapproval
f) criminals belong in jail or exile, without excuses
g) gay means light-hearted and carefree and a rainbow–what you get when the sun follows a rain shower–is pretty

* The plain truth is that the biggest beneficiaries of African slavery are American blacks. They not only a) physically exist because of it, but b) slavery has allowed them live in a white civilized society with both rule-of-law and material conditions far, far, far above what blacks are able to achieve in in Africa–even with the benefit of western knowledge, science, medicine, technology.

The whole slave trade was a disaster for whites and especially for indigenous American tribes, while it was an absolute boon for blacks. Blacks had an incredible demographic expansion, that was completely unearned. They expanded demographically without winning wars, without conquest, and without the slightest ability–technological or organizational to do so. But rather simply by being enslaved and sold to white people.

The Atlantic slave trade was indeed white people’s worse crime. But not for the reasons we hear about all the time–suffering, oppression, etc. etc.–bad stuff for sure, but stuff that’s just routine in human history. Rather the great crime is that whites enabled a huge unearned demographic expansion of an uncivilized backward people. Really a crime against civilizational progress.

* American culture used to emphasize to blacks that they should act deferential, which was humiliating because blacks aren’t a naturally deferential race like Mexicans, Asians, Filipinos, or Indians/Paks. Now American culture (primarily rap and hip hop) teaches blacks that they should act angry and savage. When blacks adapt to that type of behavior, they get a lot of respect, applause (Americans love 50 Cent rapping about getting shot), and even women. Unfortunately, they also end up killing each other a lot and terrorizing each other frequently.

America could start emphasizing proper behavior to blacks again, but won’t. It’s not just PC. It’s also because whites (and all the other races) love seeing blacks acting bad. It thrills them to see blacks acting violently in sports, music, and celebrity feuds. If blacks started acting like Chinese tomorrow, life would be so much more boring. In modern day America, people crave entertainment, so America is cool with blacks acting bad.

* Rap videos and hip hop culture are basically a minstrel show. It’s a minstrel show that allows people of all races (not just blacks) to have fun. Watching blacks act bad on tv is the equivalent of Romans cheering on gladiatorial barbarism. It’s immature and vulgar, but it’s what the people want.

Many whites tolerate the bad behavior on tv not out of a sense of guilt, but because a lot of them love it. That’s not to say that PC doesn’t matter at all, but it’s an oversold factor.

There’s a difference between entertainment and real life. In the entertainment industry, bad behavior is funny. In real life, most people won’t tolerate bad behavior because it’s not very entertaining to be victimized. Which is why whites will tolerate hip hop savagery on tv, but want strict policing in real life.

The typical white wants entertaining blacks on tv, but wants tough police to keep his suburban/rural/gentrified neighborhood safe. Our present day system (blacks get to act bad on tv, get police in their face in real life) is a reflection of what the average American wants (and what businessmen can make money off).

The downside to the system is that a lot of blacks take the hip hop stuff too seriously and embrace the thug life, which has serious consequences for them and their communities. Of course, it’d be unfair to say that whites are forcing blacks to act this way. Given how many blacks embrace hip hop and how muted criticism is among black leaders, it’d seem that they’re not particularly uncomfortable with the affect of hip hop on black communities.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Ta-Nehisi Coates Finds His Body Fascinating, Is Sure Everybody Else Does, Too

Stephen Fry and Professor Green want men to open up about their biggest worries

For Mental Health Awareness Week, a number of prominent male figures have joined a campaign to encourage men to open up about their darkest fears

Posted in Men | Comments Off on Stephen Fry and Professor Green want men to open up about their biggest worries

The Truth Will Live

J.* emails:

Recently I came across an online personality who goes by the name The Truth Will Live with whom you’ve done a number of interviews, and I wanted to thank you for having those frank, honest discussions about the controversial topics you discussed with her.

For a number of years I’d come to know of Jewish political involvement through White nationalist writers and formed opinions, as well as went as far as to troll the internet at other White nationalist’s behest which I now regret on moral grounds. Though some of what you say seems to confirm the fears of many westerners about the effects of certain factions of Jews having power in politics, it’s also good to hear that the Jewish liberal or neocon aren’t the only voices on these issues and that there are a variety of intentions and beliefs amongst Jewish people, as well as logical reasons for some of the things we perceive as threatening or dangerous.

Sometimes it’s easy to get caught up in the emotional side of an issue, especially when we fail to look at different perspectives, and it’s appreciated that you’ve expressed a perspective that many of us will never hear, as well as admitted to some of the problems people have with Judaism without excuses or denial. Most people aren’t willing to admit to their faults.

I wrote to TTWL and told her that because of your talks I’ve changed my entire stance on Israel, Judaism and Jewish people. Basically I’m admitting unknowingness or ignorance and will now approach these topics in a more agnostic manner.

My grandmother was technically Jewish by ethnicity and so would be my Dad, if what I’ve heard about matrilineal inheritance is true, but we never identified as such. It was always just that she was Russian. It’s possible that I’m the only one who my grandma told about her Jewish mother. As I’ve learned about other parts of my ancestry, I feel it would be respectful to also learn about her Jewish side and I thank you guys for waking me up to this desire to learn.

Thanks for the link. It reminds me of the Indian epic known as the Mahabharat. In the Mahabharat, there is a character named Shakuni. Shakuni is the archetypal deceiver who organizes a war in the background without taking a prominent visible position, and his motives are hard to discern. He supports the supposedly wrong heir to a kingdom and attempts to divide and conquer in support of the family he’s sided with.

In my interpretation of the Mahabharat, and the more well known section of it the Bhagvad Gita, the story espouses an ambiguity and complexity in which there aren’t easy answers as to what defines honor or morality. Shakuni is often considered to be evil, but it could also be seen as him simply doing what needs to be done to win. His, and his ally’s, enemies are not only physically stronger but are trusted in the community, too. Taking them on head first would be an automatic loss, so they use other methods.

While I think it would be more honest and traditionally honorable to be upfront about motives, I also wonder if it can be expected of these groups to adhere to such an open and honest method. Is Israel, or are the Jewish people, in a position to “play by the rules?”

But also, to look at it from another side, one would have to ask how long it will be beneficial to those groups like the ADL and SPLC as they lose respect day by day and inadvertently amplify the anti-Jewish sentiments that they are trying to fight against. Like Shakuni, the method which gave temporary victory could end up being the Achille’s heel which ultimately hurts Jews more.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on The Truth Will Live

Simple Birth Control Can Reduce The Births Of Low IQ Groups

Steve Sailer writes: “…after the Israeli Establishment quickly got tired of the Ethiopians they had let in so liberal American Jews could feel good about Zionism not being racist, they hustled the Falasha women onto Depo-Provera, with similarly effective results.”

Posted in Blacks, Ethiopia, Eugenics, Israel | Comments Off on Simple Birth Control Can Reduce The Births Of Low IQ Groups

Report: Shoplifting arrests at Eagan Outlet Mall raise question of bias

Article: “Nearly 85 percent of those arrested or cited in connection with shoplifting calls at Eagan’s new outlet mall were people of color, according to a Star Tribune analysis of nearly 1,000 calls to police in the first eight months the center was open.”

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* It is in the interest of SJWs that the rules of hate speech be ever shifting and ambiguous in order to keep the bad people off balance (people who don’t closely follow the twists and turns of the Party Line are automatically bad people) . That way, they can get you any time that they want, especially since the internet produces an indelible paper trail going back decades. If a fellow SJW makes an innocent mistake (as is inevitable) you can just ignore it (at least for as long as he or she remains a SJW in good standing), since you control the megaphone. In any case, as we have seen with the N-word, it’s OK for colored people (oops, I mean people of color) to break the rules – only white people (esp. straight white males) are capable of racism.

* > I’m sure a lot of these outlets stores are big name places who get their merchandise extremely cheap from Latin American and Chinese slave labor (e.g., Macy’s). Accept that a certain amount will be stolen and just consider it part of the cost of doing business.

That’s largely what the upscale department stores do. An expensive department store like Saks or a high-end clothing store like Banana Republic tends to make very high operating margins. Shoplifting’s a small impact, and they usually won’t go through the legal and PR bother of prosecuting anything unless it’s at least hundreds of dollars.

In contrast a low-end discount store has very thin margins. Wad-Mart makes $0.03 for every dollar of merchandise sold. If they let only 1.5% of their merchandise be shoplifted, that immediately cuts their entire profits in half. Therefore they experience a much higher impact from shoplifting and tend to be much more vigorous about prosecuting it.

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off on Report: Shoplifting arrests at Eagan Outlet Mall raise question of bias

The Killing Season

I just watched the excellent three-part Australian documentary series “The Killing Season” about leadership challenges in the Australian Labor Party 2007-2013.

Former Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd kept using the word “betrayal” to describe his deputy taking his job.

It’s a shame that Kevin does not read my blog. There’s no such thing as betrayal. That’s simply a hyperbolic term we use when other people don’t have the priorities we expect. Julia Gillard did not betray Kevin Rudd, she simply chose other priorities above Kevin Rudd.

Nothing is personal. People never do anything that we can’t find an equivalent in our own dark heart.

The sacred parts of the doco are anything to do with racism and sexism. These are shown as heinous sins.

In a sane society, diluting your country’s identity and acting against its cohesion would be regarded as heinous sins.

Posted in Australia | Comments Off on The Killing Season

Is It Wrong To Hate A Group?

I don’t believe in any such sin as prejudice, bigotry, racism, anti-Semitism, though frequently that hatred can be maladaptive because a more open attitude to out-groups is more in your best interest.

In some circumstances, openness to strangers is to your advantage. They might have information that keeps you alive. In other circumstances, suspicion of outsiders is more adaptive.

How much anti out-group sentiment you should allow depends upon the situation you are in.

There’s no commandment against any of these secular sins such as racism in my Jewish tradition. From my understanding of Judaism, you can feel whatever you want to feel about non-Jews, just so long as you act towards them justly. Judaism makes dramatic distinctions between how you must treat Jews and non-Jews.

What people today call racism and anti-Semitism and bigotry, I see as conflicts of interests. Different individuals, different groups, have different interests, and these often clash.

Christians hold that faith in Jesus Christ is the one true path to salvation. Why would any Christian nation want to invite in non-Christians to sew dissent, ridicule and unbelief? Why would a Jewish state want to invite in non-Jews to water down its Jewishness? Why would any Muslim state want to import non-Muslims who hate Islam? I don’t see such policies of exclusion as prejudice or bigotry. I see nations acting to maintain their cohesion.

I can’t think of any examples where a nation has been made stronger by diversity. It seems to me that diversity only makes a nation weaker. Every neighborhood, for instance, that becomes more diverse becomes less neighborly. People primarily care about their own.

When in the 13th Century the English nobles bribed King Edward I to expel all Jews from England, they may have made a good investment in the future of their progeny in that Jews, with their superior industry, tenacity and intelligence, were taking over the jobs that became synonymous with the Middle Class — accounting, banking, law, medicine, business, administration, etc. The primary reason that Western Europe developed such a strong Middle Class was that all its countries, at one time, expelled Jews, thus allowing the natives to develop a Middle Class. Eastern Europe didn’t expel its Jews. Hence Jews took over much of the administrative, saloon keeping, management, medicine, accounting, banking industries, out-competing the less intelligent, less industrious goyim.

Australia used to be 99% white (at the time of WWII). Now it is less than 90% white and more than 10% asian and the asians are forming Australia’s management class because they are, on average, more intelligent and more industrious than Australia’s goyim. Why would white Australia want to import groups that would displace it? It might make rational sense for white Australians to want to stop further Asian immigration and further control of Australia.

In a free economy, Jews are going to rise to the top and command much of the country’s wealth because they are smarter, more industrious and more cohesive, in general, than other groups. Asians will also rise in their skill set while whites will generally outdo blacks and latinos. Without welfare, many blacks and latinos will starve.

Say you have a black neighborhood and whites start moving in, that will diminish the cohesion and identity of that neighborhood. Blacks will say to themselves, “There goes the neighborhood!” I suspect that blacks in general have a blast being black and are happier among their own group.

Say you have a white neighborhood and blacks move in, that will hurt the cohesion of the white neighborhood. In general, blacks and whites behave differently and have different norms. Blacks have high crime rates, they’re more expressive, more aggressive, more out-spoken, more loud, more free with their emotions and more present-time oriented than comparatively awkward fearful hung-up future-oriented whites.

In comparison with Asians, whites have the black traits.

John Abbott reviews Albert S. Lindemann’s book Anti-Semitism Before the Holocaust:

What then of Lindemann’s “remedies” for antisemitism? In his view, the only reason for non-Jews to oppose Jew-hatred is that they might consider the presence of Jews beneficial (pp. 11, 102). This attempt to reduce the argument against antisemitism to a sliding cost-benefit scale seems both mechanistic and uncharitable. Might it also be that people, Jewish and gentile alike, find antisemitism repugnant precisely because it is a vicious lie? And that people oppose antisemites because they try to play the majority for fools even as they subject a minority to persecution?

I guess you can tell where I come down in these questions. To me, it makes sense that people will resent those, particularly those in out-groups, who interfere with their interests. And it does not take the majority of a group acting in a particular way to bring opprobrium to that group. Consider Muslims, for example. Only a tiny portion of Muslims are terrorists and yet Muslims as a group are hated because of Muslim terrorism. Likewise, only a minority of Jews were active communists, yet Jews as a group have been hated because certain Jews carried out Stalin’s genocides. As for Christians, Jews still speak negatively about Christians because of the behavior of a few Christians in the Crusades and the Inquisition hundreds of years ago.

Few Japanese in America prior to and during WWII were spies, and yet Japanese-Americans as a group were rightly and rationally held suspect as America had a war with Japan. Few Chinese in America are spies for China yet Chinese in America are rightly held in suspicion because of the behavior of a few. That’s how reality works. Groups experience group punishment for the deeds of a few.

Generally speaking, in-groups don’t particularly care for out-groups. Anglos are about the only race that does not make strong in-group vs out-group distinctions.

There is no universally superior group. Different groups are superior at different things. In other words, the different races adapted to their environment.

As for whether it is wrong to hate Jews or blacks, plenty of Jews hate fellow Jews and plenty of blacks hate fellow blacks. Among Jews, there is an enormous divide between the Orthodox and non-Orthodox. Among blacks, there is an enormous divide between the talented tenth, who live like whites, and the rest of blacks. Jews and blacks with right-wing views dislike Jews and blacks with left-wing views.

Youtube: Professor Douglas Whitman of Illinois State University discusses evolution in 2014: “For the most part, each human sub-species was superbly shaped by evolution to be adapted to that particular environment. You can’t say which race is the best because each race was supreme at its own particular habitat. The Mongolians and Eskimos are superior for cold. The Tibetans are superior for high altitude. The Somali are superior for deserts. Pygmies are superior for tropical rain forests. Africans are superior against African diseases and Europeans are superior against European diseases.”

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Diversity, Nationalism, Race | Comments Off on Is It Wrong To Hate A Group?

Sweden: Rape Capital of the West

Report:

Forty years after the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the formerly homogenous Sweden into a multicultural country, violent crime has increased by 300% and rapes by 1,472%. Sweden is now number two on the list of rape countries, surpassed only by Lesotho in Southern Africa.

Significantly, the report does not touch on the background of the rapists. One should, however, keep in mind that in statistics, second-generation immigrants are counted as Swedes.

In an astounding number of cases, the Swedish courts have demonstrated sympathy for the rapists, and have acquitted suspects who have claimed that the girl wanted to have sex with six, seven or eight men.

The internet radio station Granskning Sverige called the mainstream newspapers Aftonposten and Expressen to ask why they had described the perpetrators as “Swedish men” when they actually were Somalis without Swedish citizenship. They were hugely offended when asked if they felt any responsibility to warn Swedish women to stay away from certain men. One journalist asked why that should be their responsibility.

In 1975, the Swedish parliament unanimously decided to change the former homogeneous Sweden into a multicultural country. Forty years later the dramatic consequences of this experiment emerge: violent crime has increased by 300%.

If one looks at the number of rapes, however, the increase is even worse. In 1975, 421 rapes were reported to the police; in 2014, it was 6,620. That is an increase of 1,472%.

Sweden is now number two on the global list of rape countries. According to a survey from 2010, Sweden, with 53.2 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants, is surpassed only by tiny Lesotho in Southern Africa, with 91.6 rapes per 100,000 inhabitants.

Posted in Immigration, Islam, Sweden | Comments Off on Sweden: Rape Capital of the West

Two Muslims Kill A German Medical Student

Comment to Steve Sailer:

* Two Albanian Muslim twins, no schooling worth speaking of, repeat offenders, killed a German female medical student by reckless driving. They changed seats afterwards so the younger, under-aged could take the blame if needed, that being favorably legally. When police arrived they attacked them throwing a flame extinguisher, telling that they didn’t give a #uck. At court they topped that, dressing and grooming identically, which they hadn’t done before, so witnesses wouldn’t be able to tell them apart–a new twist likely advised by their lawyer. Both got suspended sentences as a result of a plea bargain. Even quality press found that to be a little odd, ultimately shrugging shoulders, of course.

Posted in Immigration, Islam | Comments Off on Two Muslims Kill A German Medical Student