The Image Of God

* Friend: “Stop looking at chicks! You’re an Orthodox Jew.”
Luke: “I was seeking the image of God in her.”

Daniel de Porto: Hot chick: “Uh, excuse me, but my image of God is up here!”

* A friend of a friend wanted to borrow $145,000 for three weeks from his brother to send to a king in Nigeria in exchange for $11.7 million in gold bullion. So my friend sent him a list of these Nigerian scams and his buddy replied: “You’re always ruining my financial opportunities. How do you know this one isn’t real? I’ve been speaking to his attorney in Nigeria.”

The same guy who fell for the Nigerian scam was fired from his volunteer position with a suicide prevention hotline.

Posted in Articles | Comments Off on The Image Of God

Media Going Nuts Over Trump

The media is really going after Trump with guilt by non-association. They are panicking that they have lost control. This is an Ashkenazi smear, one goyim rarely use. Dave Wiegel and Evan Osnos are doing it.

Good thing the new ADL isn’t afraid to play the Holocaust card on the immigration issue: Next is dis­crim­i­na­tion, which in turn sup­ports bias-motivated vio­lence, includ­ing hate crimes like the tragic one in Boston. And in the most extreme cases if left unchecked, the top of the pyra­mid of hate is genocide.

Chaim Amalek: “Given that 100% of its leaders support Israel as the JEWISH state, this is an exceptionally dangerous issue for them to get involved with. And actually, it is madness.”

Regarding the new ADL chief? Meet the new Jew, same as the old Jew.

Would the ADL be open to specifically demanding equal hate crimes implementation for minority on majority crime?

Since they are the ones pushing for this it’s an important question since they have declined such inclusionary policies in the past and their language suggests this will again expand coverage but not to those who need it the most: the majority population from minority assailants, the ones the Jew media has left behind. Doesn’t the ADL want to help those victims most in need of protection? I hope Mr. 3G will consider that.

Noticing things is a big crime these days:

SOUTH WILLIAMSPORT, Pa. (AP) — ESPN removed Curt Schilling from its broadcast team for the Little League World Series on Tuesday because of an anti-Muslim tweet.

Schilling retweeted a post that said, “Only 5-10% of Muslims are extremists. In 1940, only 7% of Germans were Nazis. How’d that go?” The post was soon removed from his Twitter feed.

The network said the tweet was unacceptable and that it “made that point very strongly to Curt.” ESPN said Schilling was removed from the Little League World Series assignment “pending further consideration.”

Chaim Amalek: “In our world, the truth does not matter.”

Oh, look, another Jew (Jeremy Diamond) thinks it’s news that David Duke has an opinion about Trump. Is this a disconnect between Jewish journalism and Americans?

Hey @JDiamond1, what about writing for a local Federation paper instead of @cnnpolitics?

Even Jews are tiring of Jewish smears against Trump: DaveWeigel: “Coming soon to Breitbart (I assume): How the media is coordinating a “Trump is a white nationalist” attack.”

* Maybe in Mexico they don’t wait their turn to ask questions and that’s why Jorge Ramos thought it was okay to just start shouting out his question.

If so, the liberals and the cucks are right — Trump should have been more culturally sensitive.

* Noah Smith, so you consider Israel fascist? Israel has enacted many of the policies Trump pushes.

Kvetcher: “Libertarian open borders types and SJWs use the term “fascist” the way teenage girls use the term “like”.”

* The more the latino and Jewish media beat up on Trump, the more white people will love him.

Posted in ADL, Donald Trump, Jews | Comments Off on Media Going Nuts Over Trump

Diversity Harms Share Values

From Chateau Heartiste: Diversity lowers a firm’s market value. Most likely share values drop when a firm’s board adds more women because investors are discounting the future rate of return of the firm based on two unflattering facts about the Diversity Danegeld: one, that a company which moves its focus to social justice adventurism loses focus from its profit-making ability, and two, an increase in female board members will result, given time, in a decrease in firm performance. (Hi, Carly!)

womendecoration

Posted in Diversity | Comments Off on Diversity Harms Share Values

Steve Sailer: NYT Dumbfounded by Higher Suspension Rate of Black Students

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* The idea that they’re not devoting enough time to raising awareness about racism at a school of education is gut-bustingly funny. My ex-wife described having to listen to hours and hours of lectures about racism, sexism, homophobia, classism, whatever-ism — there was very, very little actual discussion about “education.” She had one teacher who was radical lesbian who used to spend basically the entire class talking about how awful her life was trying to live as a lesbian. She’d break down and cry in class while talking about all the crazy lesbian drama in her life — the entire class was just a giant farce, an excuse for this crazy teacher to inflict her psychoses on a captive audience of students.

* The New York Times seems to gleefully point out that southern states have higher suspension rates. I bet most states with a substantial black population would show the same disparity. I included a link below that shows that in Minnesota 40 percent of suspensions are black students even though they are under ten percent of the population, and they are ten times as likely to be suspended as white students.

The big problem is that many school administrators and education officials have never been (or in the past 20 years) in a classroom and have no idea of the reality of dealing with unruly students. My mother was a teacher and was breaking up a fight between two black males, and was knocked to the floor pretty violently. amazingly enough, these two kids were not suspended because the district was complaining about black suspension rates. The principal later got an award for reducing black suspension rates even though the school was considerably less safe then before, but the important thing was that the school board could pat themselves on the back.

Posted in Blacks, Education | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: NYT Dumbfounded by Higher Suspension Rate of Black Students

Is Donald Trump Cool?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Rex Weiner wrote an article for High Times in the 1970s called “The ABCs of How to be Cool.” Here are excerpts of some of the attributes that fit Trump.

Attitude: If you’re absolutely convinced that what you’re doing is cool, then it’s cool. With the right attitude you can get away with anything.

Competent: Cool people are always competent (but not necessarily the other way around). The coolest way to take over a scene is to be better than everybody else.

Danger: Cool people are always dangerous because they take risks. Danger is cool because you know you’re not going to live forever, and knowing that let’s you relax. When people find out exactly how relaxed you are …when taking a controversial stand on some issue, they tend to give you the respect you deserve.

Energy: Cool people have a great deal of energy. . . They get everything done on time and always have about three or four things going on at once. [Trump sleeps four hours a night.]

Irrational: Get a reputation for being unpredictable and crazy. You’re the kind of person who’s likely to do anything anywhere anytime. But also gain a reputation for consistency. Paradox is the absolute essence of cool.

Jerks: Cool people always keep a few around, just to catch flak. [Jeb and Marco.]

Mainstream: Go against it. If everyone around you is busy being hip, be square. In a roomful of nervous people, be calm. Talk loudly in libraries. What the hell.

Opinions: Have lots of them. Like or dislike people immediately and don’t be afraid to say so. [Rosie, Megyn] Too many people go through life without ever deciding whether they want mustard or ketchup on their hamburgers.

Sex: If you’re cool, you’re sexy. [“Best sex I ever had!’ says former Trump girlfriend.]

Unique: Eminently cool people are always unlike anybody else. Nobody knows quite what makes them so, but they’ll spend hours trying to figure it out. What they come up with, often enough, is, “Boy, I sure hate that son of a bitch!” [see: Charles Krauthammer, George Will, Jonah Goldberg, Greg Gutfeld, etc.] Being hated is no less cool than being loved.

Work: Cool people are always busy. It’s cool to work. Cool people are always busy. But cool people never work up a sweat.

Extra: If you’re cool, you invariably ask for a little more, and if you’re cool, you invariably get it.

* What I’m finding fun to exam is how loyal Red Team members are slowly coming to realize that being on Red Team is not worth their time. It’s different than what we’re seeing with Blue Team, where the freak show is slowly breaking away from the main. Red Team has always defined itself in opposition to Blue Team. They are socialist and we are capitalists!

On Red Team, you see people suddenly confronting the fact that their team has always sort of hated them. At the same time, the old guard is struggling to figure out why the trouble makers appear to be mocking them, rather than fearing them. Calling Donald Trump a Nazi, for example, was met with laughter.

In Europe the realignment is easier and further advanced. You have existing parties into which dissidents can find refuge. if you have become fed up with Muslims in France, you the FN. In America, no such refuge exists. The fringe parties are nuts and the main parties are locked in a passionate embrace.

* Interesting comment at Hot Air:

Trump’s popularity is a mystery until you compare him to Putin.

Regular Americans feel emasculated, weak and disrespected in the world… and ignored/hated by their own elected officials.

Same way Russians felt crapped on and ignored (by Gorby) after the end of the Cold War.

As a backlash, they now have Putin. He might be a bully… but he’s their bully. Which is preferable to being under a wuss who cares more about the UN and world opinion than he cares about his own people. Everyone hates Putin… except for the 90% of Russians who love him.

It’s the same thing with the US today. People are tired about the President selling out to Iran. They’re mad at electing two houses of GOP Congressmen… who act like Democrats. They’re mad that their jobs are gone to Mexico and China. And they can’t figure out why the US military isn’t crushing ISIS in two weeks.

Trump is rude, crass and bombastic, but he knows his audience. And that audience would rather have a braggart, US-loving bully than another mom-jeans-wearing, UN-loving sellout.

Just watch. The more he acts like Putin, the more Americans will embrace him. It’s only natural given what they’ve been through.

* Fun guy, this Trump, but it won’t go anywhere.

This Mexico-bashing and China-bashing are ultimately meaningless since those nations have no direct control over the US.

Trump, like everyone else, is totally mum on the people with the real power. He doesn’t even have the guts to take on the homos.

In the end, it’s all about style. There is no real substance here.

And suppose Trump wins. Anyone who thinks he will make a difference is like the fools who thought ARNOLD could really change California.

Hasta La Vista, Baby.

* Trump’s parents attended Norman Vincent Peale’s church, which was part of the Reformed Church of America, which is, I think, kind of like Presbyterian but a little more liberal.

Peale was the author of the huge self-help bestseller The Power of Positive Thinking. I suspect there are all sorts of connections between the thinking of Peale and of Trump.

One interesting aspect is that Trump comes out of this pro-business power of positive thinking Protestant background, but without the Ned Flanders-style nicey-niceness that usually goes with it. Romney was kind of dragged down by his related Mormon nicey-niceness, and George H.W. Bush had to struggle with his.

Pat Buchanan survived for decades in an ideologically hostile media environment because he’s a wonderful individual who is deeply liked by most people who know him well.

* I remember being surprised when I read The Great Shark Hunt at how much Hunter Thompson liked Pat Buchanan–of all people.

* Steveosphere is a little bit behind the curve here.

Whether Trump is cool was hashed out over the past ten years on Apprentice. It’s all right there.

* Megan Kelly is Ailes/Murdoch PROXY. Wake the hell up. Fox tried to end Trump’s political career that night. There is no bigger opponent for Trump now. Exactly because Trump is an alpha with killer instinct is why he pursues his opponent relentlessly. Trump has the potential to do real damage to the Fox brand and Roger Ailes knows it.

* Trump and his family attended First Presbyterian in Jamaica, Queens before going to Peale’s Marble Collegiate Church in Manhattan.

Peale’s positive thinking is definitely evident in Trump’s attitude and speaking style and presentation. Trump is relentless in applying positive thinking. Everything he says about himself and his projects and goals is unequivocally positive.

The positive thinking “philosophy” was very much a part of bourgeois, pro-business, Protestant American mainstream culture, but now largely persists among some evangelicals e.g. Rick Warren’s “Purpose Driven Life” and in a non-Christian, New Age context. The self-help tropes about having a positive attitude, thinking positive, waking up in the morning and staring at the mirror while repeating positive mantras about yourself to yourself every day, etc., derives from positive thinking. Mainline Protestants today find it declasse and are sort of embarrassed by it.

Part of the Ned Flanders nicey-niceness comes from positive thinking philosophy, whereby being effusively positive towards other people is believed to lead to positive outcomes, just as thinking and speaking positively about yourself is. Trump’s brashness and ego however adds a twist to this formula, and he won’t speak positively to or about someone and will put someone down if it leads to himself thinking, feeling, and looking more positive.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Is Donald Trump Cool?

Gay Rights & The State Department

Ex-CIA officer Philip Giraldi writes: But even as the dust begins to settle the New York Times is reporting on a new existential crisis: same-sex marriages in the Foreign Service explored in an article entitled “State Department Fights for Rights of Gay Envoys.” Not that the Gray Lady is opposed to same-sex marriages for diplomats, quite the contrary. Its concern is that many highly qualified diplomats are turning down assignments because some benighted countries do not recognize same-sex unions and therefore do not accept that a man plus man or woman plus woman relationship actually qualifies as a diplomatic family. Which means that some Foreign Ministries are denying visas or accreditation for same-sex spouses. Worse still, as many countries regard homosexual behavior as a criminal offense, it suggests the possibility that some categories of Embassy and Consular family members not covered by full diplomatic immunity might find themselves arrested.

The Obama Administration is predictably outraged and is reported to be frantically working on the problem with the State Department making “securing the rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people around the world a priority” (my emphasis). But to my mind the fundamental problem is not same-sex marriage per se, which most Americans now no longer oppose, but the failure to comprehend what Embassies and Consular posts are supposed to do coupled with a characteristic inability to understand that American principles and rules, such as they are, do not have universal applicability. This is particularly true in the case of gay marriage, which impacts on sincerely held religious views and which is still a bone of contention even in the relatively tolerant United States and Western Europe.

Government at the White House level frequently does not understand how the great federal bureaucracies actually work. Contrary to the Times headline, being part of a diplomatic mission is a privilege, not a universal right, and both by law and convention the host country pretty much sets the rules on who may enter and under what conditions.

The article quotes Michael Guest, a gay former ambassador to Romania, who said “It’s increasingly a problem, as some countries have wanted to take a stand on the issue of marriage equality that isn’t really theirs to take.” He is wrong. The Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations stipulates that any country can expel or refuse to accept the presence of a foreign diplomat without providing any reasons whatsoever. Article 9 includes “The receiving State may at any time and without having to explain its decision, notify the sending State that the head of the mission or any member of the diplomatic staff of the mission is persona non grata or that any other member of the staff of the mission is not acceptable.” This is an option that the United States has exercised frequently in espionage cases as well as more recently in refusing to issue a visa to a proposed Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations in New York, for which the U.S. is the host nation.

The United States has also somewhat more questionably taken steps to restrict the travels of accredited diplomats with whom it is uncomfortable. Soviet era dips from Eastern Europe and Russia were generally required to get approval for traveling more than 25 miles outside of New York City or Washington and there have been similar restrictions on the movement of both Palestinian and Iranian representatives. So the host country is not obligated to accept anyone else’s standards and can in many respects set whatever rules it wishes within its sovereign territory…

It is indeed acceptable for a national government to urge greater tolerance as President Obama did on his recent trip to Africa but creating a bureaucracy to assert the global primacy of American values to include what constitutes a marriage benefits no one, least of all those being “protected,” as in many countries that would only serve to enable labeling the sexual dissidents as American agents. And the idea of punishing the families of diplomats from countries that see marriage differently is completely absurd as it will produce retaliation, damaging to genuine American interests and potentially threatening the security of U.S. diplomats overseas.

The entire feel good process of instructing others how to live derives from a peculiar American sense that we somehow understand important things better than anyone else and everyone should follow our lead. It is a dangerous conceit as it breeds resentment and inevitably leads to tit-for-tat responses that serve no purpose. The United States is already viewed negatively by a large part of the world. Adding fuel to the fire by complaining about others’ values while promoting marginal causes that inevitably will be controversial is not what most American citizens should expect from their government. Unfortunately it is all too often what we wind up getting.

Posted in Homosexuality | Comments Off on Gay Rights & The State Department

Has Israel’s Relationship With America Been Shaken Over The Iran Deal?

Has Israel’s prime minister over-reached? Have certain Jews over-reached in protesting the Iran deal? Have they done irreparable damage to Israel’s security by damaging its relationship with America?

Uri Avnery writes: All Israelis agree that the one supreme asset Israel has is its special, unparalleled relationship with the US. It is unique.

Unique and priceless. In military terms, Israel gets the most up-to-date weapon systems, practically for nothing. No less important, Israel cannot conduct any war for more than a few days without an airlift of munitions and spare parts from the US.

But that is only a small element of our national security. Even more important is the knowledge that you cannot threaten Israel without confronting the entire might of the United States. This is a formidable umbrella, the envy of the world.

More than that, every country in the world knows that if you want something from Washington DC, and especially from the US Congress, you better pass through Jerusalem and pay a price. How much is that worth?

And then there is the veto. Not the little veto Obama will use to neutralise a Congress vote against the agreement, but the big veto, the one that blocks every single UN Security Council resolution to censure Israel, even for actions that cry to high heaven. A 49-year-old occupation. Hundreds of thousands of settlers who contravene international law. Almost daily killings.

Condemn Israel? Forget it. Sanctions against Israel? Don’t make us laugh. As long as the almighty US protects Israel, It can do whatever it wants.

All this is now put in question. Perhaps the damage has already been done, like hidden cracks in the foundations of a building. The scale of the damage may become apparent only in coming years.

Another hidden crack is the rift between Israel and a large part of the Jews around the world, especially in the US. Israel claims to be the “nation-state of the Jewish people”. All Jews throughout the world owe it unquestioning allegiance. A mighty apparatus of “Jewish organisations” is policing the vassals. Woe to the Jew who dares to object.

Not anymore. A rift has opened within world Jewry, that probably cannot be repaired. Commanded to choose between their president and Israel, many American Jews prefer their president, or just opt out.

Who is the anti-Semite who has managed to bring all this evil about? No other than the prime minister of Israel himself…

Yet there are great opportunities. Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies, as well as Egypt, are already hinting that they could cooperate with Israel. In deepest secrecy, of course. Nobody can shake hands openly with Israel as long as the Arab masses see every day on their TV sets the misdeeds of the settlers, the killings of the occupation army, the humiliation of the Palestinian brothers. Like a heavy weight tied to the leg of a swimmer, the occupation prevents us from reacting to the changes in the region.

Lately, there have been ever-stronger rumours about secret negotiations between Netanyahu and Hamas for an eight- or 10-year-long armistice, that would amount to an unofficial peace agreement. It would create a tiny Palestinian mini-state, while isolating even more Mahmoud Abbas and the main body of the Palestinian people, who are committed to the Arab peace plan.

All this for what? For enlarging the settlements and perhaps annexing another part of the West Bank (“Area C”).

So is the man shrewd or just foolish? A magician or just a magician’s apprentice?

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on Has Israel’s Relationship With America Been Shaken Over The Iran Deal?

LAT: Reports of sexual harassment by Metro commuters could hinder efforts to boost ridership

Los Angeles Times: “Although six in 10 Metro passengers are Latino, black passengers reported the highest rates of indecent exposure, physical contact and harassment overall.”

I wonder how much of what happens on LA Metro mirrors the rest of life? Which groups of people disproportionately commit more crimes and more harassment and more rape?

NPR reports Nov. 1, 2014:

There’s a video that’s been circulating online since Tuesday, and it frames itself like this: a woman walks around New York City for 10 hours, with a camera secretly recording as she gets street-called 100 times by men.

The woman who does the walking is Shoshana Roberts. Most of the men who street-harass, call out and follow her are black and Latino. Noticeably absent from the video? White men.

It’s something a lot of people noted.

“The racial politics of the video are [f*****] up,” the author Roxane Gay commented on Twitter. “Like, she didn’t walk through any white neighborhoods?”

Slate’s Hanna Rosin noticed the same.

“The one dude who turns around and says, “Nice,” is white, but the guys who do the most egregious things—like the one who harangues her, “Somebody’s acknowledging you for being beautiful! You should say thank you more,” or the one who follows her down the street too closely for five whole minutes—are not.”

“Catcalling has always been an uncomfortable feminist issue because of the class and race dynamics involved,” Rosin said Friday in an interview with NPR’s Here & Now. “And that’s a much more difficult conversation to have than the straight forward one of look at this woman being harassed looking down the street.”

And Akiba Solomon at Colorlines echoed both Gay and Rosin’s concerns. But she also pointed out — albeit, a little tentatively — that the video “characterizes all of the men’s behavior as the same. So ‘hello,’ a demand for gratitude, and following the woman all carry the same weight.”

The video was created by an anti-harassment organization Hollaback! and Rob Bliss Creative, an ad agency. Rosin says that Bliss apologized on reddit — in a post that’s now deleted — for editing out white men. Bliss wrote “We got a fair amount of white guys, but for whatever reason, a lot of what they said was in passing, or off camera.” That’s why Bliss said he had to edit them out. (Serious question: Weren’t most of the street harassers in the video interacting “in passing”?)

This isn’t the first time Bliss’ work has had some troubling portrayals of brown folks, Rosin writes. When he created a promotional video for Grand Rapids, Mich., Bliss reportedly minimized the city’s sizable minority population.

Steve Sailer writes:

Nationwide, according to the 2011 Obama Administration study “Homicide Trends in the United States, 1980-2008,” blacks were almost eight times more likely to be homicide offenders.

But, of course, noticing patterns and looking for simple explanations runs afoul of that dominant rule of 21st Century thought: Occam’s Racist.

Lawrence Auster wrote in 2007:

Like Ahab’s search for the Great White Whale, liberals’ search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending. When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley’s and Al Sharpton’s then year-old spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false, the Nation said it didn’t matter, since the charges expressed the essential nature of white men’s treatment of black women in this country. When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America.
To see the real truth of the matter, let us take a look at the Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005. (Go to the linked document, and under “Victims and Offenders” download the pdf file for 2005.)

In Table 42, entitled “Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender,” we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.) In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black. In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.

The table does not gives statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear:

In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.

What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.

The Department of Justice statistics refer, of course, to verified reports. According to the Wikipedia article on rape, as many as half of all rape charges nationally are determined by police and prosecutors to be false:

Linda Fairstein, former head of the New York County District Attorney’s Sex Crimes Unit, noted, “There are about 4,000 reports of rape each year in Manhattan. Of these, about half simply did not happen…. It’s my job to bring justice to the man who has been falsely accused by a woman who has a grudge against him, just as it’s my job to prosecute the real thing.”
No wonder there was such absolute belief in the guilt of the Duke students among the leading sectors of liberal America. A drug-addled, half-deranged, promiscuous black stripper accused three young white men of raping her. There are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the United States, and half of all rape charges against specific individuals turn out to be false. But in the gnostic, inverted world of liberal demonology, the white students had to be guilty.

Meanwhile, in the real America, week after week, the newspapers report the rapes of white women by black men—though, of course, without ever once using the words, “a white woman was raped by black man.” Just last week in the New York Post there was a story about a serial black rapist who invaded women’s apartments on Manhattan’s Upper West Side; you knew the rapist was black from a police drawing accompanying the story, and you knew the victims were most likely white from the neighborhoods where the attacks occurred. But even when news media’s reports of black on white rape make the race of the perpetrator evident (which the media only does in a minority of instances), no explicit reference is ever made to the racial aspect of the case. Each story of black on white rape is reported in isolation, not presented as part of a larger pattern. There is never the slightest mention of the fact that white women in this country are being targeted by black rapists. In the inverted world of liberalism, the phenomenon does not exist.

Posted in Blacks, Rape, Traffic | Comments Off on LAT: Reports of sexual harassment by Metro commuters could hinder efforts to boost ridership

The Merits Of The Free Market

Chaim Amalek: “Yes. And this is why whites who base their politics on free market economics have simply been digging their own graves for over a generation. Look at the ultra orthodox Jews of Brooklyn and environs. Do you imagine that any of their learned elders ever waste time debating the merits of free markets versus regulated ones?”

Roger Devlin: “Greg Johnson’s summation of Ron Paul’s program was perfectly apt: Paul wants to ensure that the little brown people who are taking our country from us will enjoy the benefits of a hard currency. This is the sort of confused priorities that come from having a narrowly economic view of the social good. Contrast Pat Buchanan’s view (quoting from memory) that “the economy is not the nation, and when what is good for the economy differs from what is good for the nation, the nation comes first.” My own ideal society would subordinate the economy to the good of the family as well as the nation…”

“Conflict is not due to any misunderstanding which might be corrected, but to the intrinsic nature of the two peoples. Of course, in politics we do not have the luxury of viewing conflict sub specie aeternitatis, and we must do what is best for our own people. This has nothing to do with harboring negative feelings toward Jews or anyone else, but only with perceiving our ethnopolitical situation accurately in order to act upon it rationally. I work with dissident Jews who are willing to work with me, but I do not foresee any time when the perceived self-interest of organized Jewry coincides with White self-interest.”

Chaim Amalek: “Whites are finished. You goyim should have been having this conversation in 1990 instead of spending all of your energies on saving every last zygote.”

Posted in Economics, Nationalism | Comments Off on The Merits Of The Free Market

The Muslims Next Door

Good liberal Jewish friends of mine are not happy about Muslims moving next door. My friends stand for same-sex marriage and tolerance and civil rights, but they’re not thrilled with Muslims because Muslims embody an anti-liberal attitude.

My friends say: I won’t be friendly. This is a Jewish street. Why would they even want to be here? So many other streets. They are taunting me.

Perhaps we need a Jewish version of the KKK to dress up in scary robes and light a menorah on their front yard?

Chaim Amalek: “We already have that. They are called Hasidim, and they even have their own paramilitary force patrolling the streets of their communities in Brooklyn: the Shomrim.”

Yaakov suggested we just stick to what works and put a burning cross on their lawn–let the Christians take blame for our prejudice.

Posted in Islam | Comments Off on The Muslims Next Door