August 27, 2015 White Nationalists Support Donald Trump Luke Ford No sacred cows.

White Nationalists Support Donald Trump

Posted on August 27, 2015 by Luke Ford

From BuzzFeed.com: Jared Taylor, who runs the site American Renaissance — which argues that “one of the most destructive myths of modern times is that people of all races have the same average intelligence” — is an avid supporter of The Donald.
In a recent post, Taylor contended, “If Mr. Trump loses, this could be the last chance whites have to vote for a president who could actually do something useful for them and for their country.”
In an interview on Wednesday with BuzzFeed News, Taylor further explained that his support for Trump was based on his desire for whites to remain the majority racial group in the United States.
“Why should whites want to be a minority?” he said. “Answer me that question. Why should we want to celebrate diversity when celebrating diversity means celebrating our dwindling numbers and influence? And to the extent that Trump succeeds in putting the brakes on immigration, he will also be succeeding at reducing the speed with which whites are reduced to a minority.”
He added that this was the way “frankly that all whites feel, we just never dare say so.”
Brad Griffin, who writes under the pseudonym Hunter Wallace for the white nationalist blog Occidental Dissent (“We don’t want to see our peoples be submerged”), said in an interview that he supports Trump for other reasons. In addition to his staunch opposition to immigration, he also noted the candidate’s positions on “trade, political correctness, and campaign finance.”
“I like the fact that he’s funny,” Griffin added.
Peter Brimelow, the founder of the extreme anti-immigration Vdare.com, agrees.
“He just shoots from the hip but his hip seems to move in a very good direction,” he said on a recent podcast.
“They are stunning,” Brimelow said of Trump’s immigration proposals. “They were stunning.”
“In the Meet the Press interview he gave, just flat-out said they have to go. And he doesn’t say that in his actual position paper, but of course it’s good news and of course he’s right they should go,” Brimelow said later. “All of them.”
The immigration plan is a particular winner with the white nationalists. In a weekly report last week, Rocky J. Suhayda, chair of the American Nazi Party, similarly praised Trump’s immigration policy and attitude.
“Americans of ALL races are FED UP with this ILLEGAL ALIEN INVASION — so he says that he’ll BUILD a WALL to keep them out! CHEERS! He states that “Political Correctness” is disgusting and it’s time to STOP IT! More CHEERS! He DARES to turn his guns on the paid morons of the system controlled MEDIA! And regular folks LOVE it,” he wrote.
On a recent podcast, Stormfront radio co-host Don Advo affirmed Ann Coulter’s description of Trump’s immigration plan as “the greatest political document since the Magna Carta” — though he noted that was “a little bit of an exaggeration, but not very much of one.”
Trump’s critics, Advo said, are people “living on the pieces of silver that they get from their Jewish paymasters so that they can preside over our extermination, our disposition, and our ultimate disappearance from the face of the earth.”
Advo’s anti-Semitic language was in reference to conservative commentators like Michael Medved, Hugh Hewitt, and David Brooks.
On his podcast, Richard B. Spencer, the president of the white nationalist National Policy Institute, said while what Trump is saying isn’t that different from other Republicans, Trump’s passion “inspired” him.
“Trump says things, says these in a way — mundane things — with such gusto, with such visceral energy and toughness, that’s why he’s gotten under the skin of his critics and that’s why he’s kind of inspired people like me is because he gives us the impression that he gets it maybe on a visceral level and maybe not on an intellectual or policy level,” Spencer said.
This mirrors the comments of Advo, who believes that whether or not Trump wins, his campaign is “gonna give people the ability to come openly out of the shadows and really work very hard for something that will have a lasting effect.”
“This anger, this fire, is not going to go away,” he said. “It’s not going to go away at all. And that has not been noticed by the neocons — or perhaps we should them neo-Cohens — in the Republican Party.”
Sentiments like those are not uncommon among white nationalist Trump defenders.
Andrew Anglin, who edits the neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer, wrote an article on Wednesday contending that New Yorker writer Evan Osnos’ recent story on white nationalist support for Trump was a product of the author being a “super-Jew.”
“The Jew activism against Trump is just beginning,” Anglin wrote. “Osnos’ piece has set a narrative that people who support The Donald are ‘neo-Nazis’ and the rest of the Jew media is already running with it. Huffington Post just did a piece on it, and I’ve gotten three emails from newspapers plus one from CNN asking for comments on Trump.”
Anglin clarified on Wednesday via email what he meant by “Jew activism against Trump,” suggesting that BuzzFeed News was involved in this conspiracy, in spite of Trump framing himself, “for decades, as a proponent of the Jewish people.”
“Although it is a bit ridiculous for me to explain what I mean by ‘Jew activism’ to a BuzzFeed reporter,” Anglin wrote, “what I refer to is the Jewish-controlled media outlets and political groups which act in concert to push what can only be, in objective terms, viewed as a collective ethnic agenda.”
He continued, “Aside from lobbying for unlimited money and weapons to be sent to Israel forever, lobbying for unlimited mass non-white immigration has for decades been at the core of Jewish political activism. All of these Jewish groups are entirely obsessed with flooding America with brown people.
“As such, I don’t think Trump’s repeatedly stated support for Israel is going to mean much to these aggressive ethnic activists, and they will instead throw their massive political and media clout behind trying to thwart him.”

Posted in Donald Trump, Whites | Comments Off

The Gay Community’s Serial Killer Problem

Posted on August 27, 2015 by Luke Ford

BLOG: In 2009, the Senate passed legislation extending hate crime laws to protect the gay and lesbian community.

The bill was a result of murder of Matthew Shepard, a gay University of Wyoming student who was murdered in 1998. For 15 years, Shepard’s death was used a primary example of hate crimes against gays.

However, after the research and release of a book on Shepard’s death by Stephen Jimenez, even the LGBTQ community has accepted that the murder was not a hate crime . . . as it was a drug deal gone bad and result of the “crystal meth subculture.”

Regardless of those facts, the LGBTQ community still demands protection under hate crime laws along with preferential treatment for transgenders.

Groups that boldly demand protection and preferential treatment as a class, must be willing to address issues their own community.

In the case of the LGBTQ community, the 800-pound gorilla in the room is the correlation between sexual orientation and violence.

According to the Serial Killer Database maintained by Radford University, 52% of U.S. serial killers are white, and 92% are male.

However, in a dated study conducted in 2003, 69% of serial killers were either self-described homosexuals or engaged in homosexual behavior “immediately, prior to, during or after committing their murders.”

In verifying and updating this number, a random sampling of 59 U.S. serial killers after 1960 was collected and studied. Of those 59 convicted murderers, 39 were found to be gay, 66%.

Given that arguably 3.8% of the population of the United States self-identifies as gay, the statistical outlier of 60%+ of convicted serial killers being homosexual should be cause for concern within the LGBTQ community.

While some would argue the numbers are too small for scientific analysis, laws have been enacted on far less evidence, such as with the reaction to Matthew Shepard’s murder.

Rather than address this issue with a significant study, the LGBTQ community instead continues to push hate crime statistics of crimes against gays, lesbians and transgenders.

But a solution to minimize those assaults may be right under their nose as a recent report by a gay British group showed that 30% of hate crimes on gays were between victims and aggressors who were “previously acquainted.”

While the U.S. government tracks hate crime statistics along with their general crime database, they fail to gather and release data that could verify and lead to resolution of what appears to be a significant cultural issue within the LGBTQ community.

Posted in Homosexuality | Comments Off

Can Whites Be Saved?

Posted on August 27, 2015 by Luke Ford

From Chateau Heartiste: I was listening to the news (big mistake) and I heard her father (confirmed), give a statement to the press that was straight outta the SWPL SJW leftoid equalist playbook — blame guns, don’t mention the 800 pound faggot chimp in the room — that left me feeling utterly despondent that a large fraction of Whites will ever see the light. They will have to be dragged kicking, screaming, and maybe dying, to the truth.

The human ego is that strong. So strong that it can cloud an ideological liberal father’s mind and make him say things which are the equivalent of pissing on his daughter’s fresh grave. I understand that in his inconceivable grief he may not be thinking straight and is giving in to his cultivated compulsion to blame a convenient liberal token of the anti-White hate machine… in this case, guns… for his daughter’s murder. But a healthy White society doesn’t fill the heads of its liberal contingent with abject lies and false narratives so thoroughly that even the murder of a daughter is incapable of shaking her father from his cherished shibboleths.

A healthy White society speaks power to truth. Clear eyes, full hearts, unpolluted minds. In this aspirational society, a liberal White father who feels antipathy to gun owners would not, as his first instinct, lurch to parrot a liberal political agenda to explain away the murder of his lovely daughter by an envious, resentful, white-hating, violent, homosexually imbalanced black male.

Alison Parker’s father is far from the first liberal father of a daughter murdered by a numinous negro to avoid staring into the abyss for the comfort of his ideological purity. He will not be the last.

Until he literally is the last.

With heavy heart, I concede that liberal Whites are simply irredeemable. If a daughter’s sadistically televised and annotated murder by a buttfucking dindu can’t rouse a father, in his crisis moment of uncontrollable rage and grief, to surrender his conspicuously disproven liberal beliefs in a soul-cleansing warrior’s wail of righteous vengeance that honors the memory of his slain child…

then nothing will.

The inevitable logic of rancid ethnomasochism is death. Of the body and of the ego.

There is no other way out, but betrayal of their equalist-drenched anti-principles.

And when has that ever happened?

Posted in Blacks, Whites | Comments Off

Obama’s Sons Or Trump’s Daughters?

Posted on August 27, 2015 by Luke Ford

What do you want for America?

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off

Racism Is Turning Down A Black Guy For Sex

Posted on August 26, 2015 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* I bet that dead Black Homo Bryce Williams definition of “racism” was White guys turning down his sexual advances.

Here is an article about so-called “racism” in the LGBT community. What passes for “racism” in that community is a White Homo saying no to being asked out on a date by a Black Homo.

* I am looking at the most “liked” NY Times comments (which BTW, often run in surprisingly non-PC directions on issues such as immigration) and they are uniformly talking about “guns” with no mention of the racial dimension whatsoever. Imagine the outcry if a white guy had killed a popular black news anchor after claiming racial grievances against blacks.

* The media does not hold Black Lives Matter to the same high moral standards as people who own a Confederate flag. Black Lives Matter should have been finished as an organization after a Black thug in Memphis named Tremaine Wilbourn murdered a White police officer.

If everyone who owns a Confederate flag is morally responsible for the Charleston church shooting, that Black Lives Matter is morally responsible every time a police officer is killed by a Black thug while in the line of duty.

Speaking of Memphis, if Elvis Presley was still alive today I wonder what he would think about the 3rd world ghettozation of a city he once called home. Would he have White flighted out of there?

The shooter’s manifesto says that he acted specifically in revenge for the black church shootings but the news reports don’t seem to be picking up on this at all.

* My favorite complaint about requiring people to have ID is the gripe that retired people and unemployed people don’t have time to get one.

It’s not just the bitching about them somehow not having time, despite not having a job – it’s the fact that they are often receiving thousands of dollars, or even tens of thousands, in food stamps, Medicare, Medicaid, cash assistance, ad infinitum.

* Unemployed welfare people in the inner city can not afford to go to the local DMV to get a state issued ID, because they do not have the $2 dollars it takes to get on a public bus that will drop them off there, sarcasm.

MORE COMMENTS:

* I’d be kind of curious to know if there are any plans for Hollywood to do a film about Elliot Rogers and The Day of Retribution. If the dysfunction of Compton is worth a film surely the dysfunction of of a boy growing up around the film industry is worth a look and the producer has a ‘free script’ to dramatize. I know it would be cutting close to the bone but, to me, Rogers is an infinitely more interesting subject than common as dirt hoodrats.

* Even when I was young and unenlightened about the true nature of blacks’ relationship to the police I recall listening to those first records and thinking it was somewhat ironic the lyrical content was divided between two thirds boasting of criminal violence and another third complaining of police harassment. I realize now that’s unfair; they weren’t hypocrites at all, just liars, and the criminal exploits were pure bs. Their real complaint was they were getting harassed on the streets just like the thugs, despite being mostly harmless. But you weren’t going to sell records with that.
It’s ironic also that the real “criminal” in the bunch, E, publicly supported one of the cops charged in the Rodney King fiasco because he thought he was being treated unfairly (Briseno, I think it was). Of course the others (the phony gangsters), already beefing with him by then, seized on that. I think I’ll spill one for Easy right now.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off

How To Deal With The Grievance Industry

Posted on August 26, 2015 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* The best thing about Trump’s rise is that he serves as a model for how to deal with the Perpetual Grievance Society: every time they act as if Trump has said something so outrageous he can’t possibly survive, and he better kneel and apologize if he ever wants to be allowed back in this town again, he just thumbs his nose at them, and watches his poll numbers rise.

This presents a really very dangerous prospect for the SJWs–and they are all SJWs. Suppose people catch on that brazening it out after flouting political correctness is the path to popularity and respectability among the masses. What then? Especially, what if other politicians and other public figures see how this works?

What’s left of the career opportunities for an SJW if that’s what Trump proves?

* As I make my way through The Art of the Deal, I see plenty of hints that Trump kinda knows the time of day about blacks. Not just because of how he got out of his father’s particular kind of real estate business because of the Federal lawsuit hassles. But he also has a chapter on his very first real estate deal out of college, in Cincinnati. He took over an apartment complex full of just about the worst white people imaginable, people from the Kentucky mountains. He gradually got them out, had them renovated, and got a better more working and middle class variety of white people into the complex. Then one day, one of his tenants approached him when he came to Cincinnati to check up on things, and out of the blue, advised him to sell, because the black undertow (not said in those words) was encroaching. And that it did.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off

White Lives Matter

Posted on August 26, 2015 by Luke Ford

From 2009:

REPORT: LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (CBS/AP) Curtis Lavelle Vance, the man accused of killing beautiful Arkansas television anchorwoman Anne Pressly, told police he beat her with a wood-handled garden tool after she awoke and found him committing a sex act beside her bed, a detective testified Tuesday.

Vance described how he hit the KATV personality as many as five times, shattering her left arm as she held it up to shield her face, Little Rock police Detective Tommy Hudson said. Hudson’s testimony came as Pulaski County Circuit Judge Chris Piazza weighs whether to throw out Vance’s often convoluted statements to police, and DNA evidence, before the trial set for Nov. 2.

Vance, 28, of Marianna, has pleaded not guilty to charges of capital murder, rape, residential burglary and theft over the Oct. 20 attack on Pressly at her home near the Little Rock Country Club. Pressly, 26, died five days later, having never regained consciousness.

Pressly graduated from Rhodes College in Memphis, Tenn., and worked for WBBJ-TV in Jackson, Tenn., in 2006.

Vance could face lethal injection if convicted of the slaying, as Piazza rejected defense lawyers’ claims Tuesday that the death penalty overwhelmingly targets blacks convicted of violent crime against whites.

The team of public defenders representing Vance claim police improperly obtained the statements from him, as well as pressured him into offering saliva swabs for DNA testing. Vance himself has claimed police shoved a gun in his face at one point to get him to confess.

Detective J.C. White testified that Vance went willingly to the Marianna police station Nov. 25, 2008, as authorities looked into possible connections between the Pressly attack and an unsolved rape in Vance’s hometown, about 90 miles east of Little Rock.

White also testified that laboratory testing found that a hair found in Pressly’s home matched Vance’s DNA. Last November, police said it also matched a sample from a rape in Marianna. Officers focused on Vance after he was reported being in an area that had seen several burglaries.

A tape-recorded police interview played in court had Vance sounding friendly and cooperating with detectives when they first interviewed him. A detective also testified that Vance used the swab to provide the saliva that prosecutors say ties him to the slaying.

“Y’all showed me the utmost respect,” Vance said at the end of that interview.

Police arrested Vance on Nov. 26 and detectives conducted another interview with him that night. Vance refused to have the interview recorded, but Hudson testified that the man offered three different versions of what happened the night of the attack on Pressly. Each version put him in the Heights neighborhood, looking to steal laptop computers, the detective said.

Hudson said Vance’s final version put him inside Pressly’s house, beating her with a garden tool he stole from a backyard shed. Vance later said he threw the tool out of his car when driving over the Arkansas River. When detectives questioned him about Pressly’s rape, Vance requested a lawyer and ended the interview.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off

New Yorker On Donald Trump

Posted on August 26, 2015 by Luke Ford

Jared Taylor writes:

The New Yorker has just published a 7,500-word article about Donald Trump, except it’s not really about Donald Trump. Two thirds of it is about Mr. Trump’s supporters–including me–and that’s what explains the title: “The Fearful and the Frustrated” [August 31, 015]. New Yorker readers can feel smug without even reading the article; Mr. Trump appeals to losers, just as they have always thought.

The author Evan Osnos, [Email him] is a veteran journalist and has been with the New Yorker for seven years. After weeks of following Mr. Trump around and talking to his fans, he announces that Mr. Trump is “expanding the discourse of hate,” that his core supporters are “the portion of the electorate that is drifting deeper into unreality,” that he could unleash “anti-democratic politics,” and that he appeals directly to “the crude tribalism that Richard Hofstadter named ‘the paranoid style’.”

What a monster! New Yorker readers can feel delightfully superior not only to Mr. Trump but to the unhinged primitives who might actually vote for him–that is to say, the 55 percent of white men who say that would back him over Hillary Clinton.

The article is a perfect example of blinkered, self-congratulatory journalism. It makes no effort actually to understand anything. Mr. Osnos does quote one or two key ideas of Mr. Trump’s supporters but he pees on them from a very great height rather than try to refute them.

In June, when Mr. Osnos first asked to interview me he wrote to say that he was working on “a piece about race, in the wake of the Charleston event.” I thought this was an important subject so I invited him to my house. We spoke for two hours about Dylann Roof and what might have motivated him: race differences, immigration, and what demographic change means for America. Mr. Osnos assured me that he was “trying very hard to understand” dissident thinking, so I arranged for him come back to my house and meet several other racial dissidents.

At some point, though, like everyone else, Mr. Osnos appears to have been dazzled by the Trump juggernaut. He dropped his original angle, and focused instead on discrediting Mr. Trump by digging up the most hair-raising and off-beat supporters he could find. He now claims to have found the one Trump supporter who reportedly watched the Republican debate while sipping coffee from a cup with a swastika on it.

As part of this project, Mr. Osnos trotted out the Daily Stormer, Stormfront, the League of the South, National Policy Institute, VDARE.COM, the Traditional Youth Network, and American Renaissance, apparently to thrill his fellow liberals with the news that people associated with what the SPLC calls “hate groups” are paying attention to Donald Trump. When Mr. Osnos wrote that the Federation for American Immigration Reform has called Mr. Trump’s immigration plan the “American Workers’ Bill of Rights,” he was careful to add that FAIR, too, “is classified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center.” This is what passes for journalism these days, but is as meaningless as digging up the seven remaining American Stalinists and recording their praise for Bernie Sanders.

Despite his hours and hours of conversations with racially conscious whites, Mr. Osnos avoided conveying almost any of their central arguments, but he let one slip through.

He quoted Richard Spencer of the National Policy Institute on the “unconscious vision that white people have–that their grandchildren might be a hated minority in their own country.”

He quoted Hunter Wallace of the League of the South pointing out that the reaction of Southerners to the removal of the Confederate battle flag justifies “fears that people have about what happens when we become a minority.”

He quoted me asking, “Why are whites supposed to be happy about being reduced to a minority?”

There’s a pattern here. At least some people who take an interest in Mr. Trump don’t want whites to become a minority. President Trump would slow that process. But the questions of what a non-white America will be like and why anyone might not want that don’t get one word from Mr. Osnos. Apparently it is “hate” merely to ask. But simply to brush the matter aside is not the work of someone who is “trying very hard to understand” anything.

Only once did Mr. Osnos actually try to examine a Trump-related grievance. He quoted Matthew Heimbach of the Traditional Youth Network as saying, “[W]e are going to be the first generation in American history to be living worse than our parents.” Mr. Osnos notes that Mr. Heimbach lives in Cincinnati, works as a landscaper, and rents part of a house. He concedes that with “the decline of manual labor . . . nobody has been hit harder than low-skilled, poorly educated men.”

In other words: “It’s just as you thought, dear New Yorker reader. The people who like Trump are the yokels in fly-over country.” Mr. Osnos went to Harvard, drives a late model Mercedes, and works in Washington, DC.

But even more surprising is Mr. Osnos’s factual sleight of hand. He quotes what Mr. Trump said about Mexican criminals when he announced his candidacy and then sniffs that “the crime rate among first-generation immigrants is lower than that for native-born Americans–but Trump takes an expansive view of reality.”

First of all, a country should be able to choose its immigrants, and letting in even one criminal is a failure. Second, although our government makes it very hard to find out true rates of immigrant crime, the Center for Immigration Studies estimates the following incarceration rates per 1,000 for men aged 18 to 40:

Whites: 16
Non-black US-born Americans: 20
Mexican immigrants: 23
All US-born Americans: 31
US-born Mexicans: 38

Straight Talk about Immigrant Crime, By Steven A. Camarota, July 23, 2015

The same rate for blacks, who are 12.2 % percent of American natives: 93 per 1,000. (Calculated from the Public Use Files of the American Community Survey.)

So, if Mexican immigrants do commit crimes at a lower rate than natives, it is only because the native rate is swollen by blacks and US-born Mexicans! The children of those immigrants will raise the crime rate.

After sneering about “Trump’s phantasmagorical visions of marauding immigrants,” Mr. Osnos moves right on to other “hoaxes and theories that were once confined to the margins have been laundered through mainstream media outlets.” His prize example? The knockout game. He quotes a study that–he says–“searched for a single actual case of the knockout game and found none.”

In fact, the study says there are even videos of “groups of black men casually walking down the street and sucker-punching a white passerby, without a word and for no apparent reason,” but insists there has been “no measurable increase in these types of attacks.” [The ‘Knockout Game’: Moral Panic and the Politics of White Victimhood, By Mike King [Email him] Race Class April-June 2015 v]. Here is just one of the many YouTube videos about the game.

The knockout game–otherwise known as “polar bear hunting” because of the usual race of the victim–has been well established at least since 2009, but Mr. Osnos has kept himself resolutely ignorant.

This sort of thing makes a mockery of the New Yorker’s vaunted fact checking. A nice lady from the magazine called and wanted to know if I had said the things Mr. Osnos quoted me as saying when he interviewed me and five other people. Indeed, I had. But Mr. Osnos ominously concluded his account of the conversation with: “They uniformly predicted a violent future.” I never made such a prediction, and I don’t remember anyone else doing so, and the nice lady never asked about that. But Mr. Osnos can’t resist peddling a dark vision of white men hoarding guns and ammo.

He tells us Mr. Trump has “unleashed an old gene in American politics” that leads “to the anti-democratic politics of absolutism.” What?! Not a single one of the “haters” to whom Mr. Osnos spoke said one word that could be construed as “anti-democratic.” What is the leap of hysteria by which people like Mr. Osnos conclude that people with whom they disagree are anti-democratic?

Mr. Osnos ends the article with the claim that Mr. Trump’s core supporters are “the portion of the electorate that is drifting deeper into unreality, with no reconciliation in sight.”

If there is no reconciliation in sight it is because of the heroic blindness of people like Mr. Osnos, who do not even try to look past clichés about “hate,” “crude tribalism,” “fear and frustration,” and “the paranoid style.”

Soviet psychiatrists decided free-markets advocates were insane and locked them up in mental hospitals, so the New Yorker is heir to a proud tradition.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off

Donald Trump Is No Bitch

Posted on August 26, 2015 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* CNN’s comment at the end of the video clip: “Ramos refused to back down.” Bold, strong Ramos.

Most people would have said, “Ramos refused to shut up and wait his turn, but backed down when Donald’s security men confronted him.” Loud-mouthed, self-important and weak-kneed.

Trump had a much better sense of the visuals than the TV star, Ramos.

* Tony Rock who is Chris Rock’s brother, referred to Donald Trump as a gangsta on Red Eye. In the African American community it is considered a compliment to be referred to as a gangsta. It means you are the opposite of a bitch.

* Chris Rock’s latest movie “Take Five” wasn’t as good as I’d hoped it would be, but it was pretty iSteveish.

* This is why the Republican beltway consultant class of barnacles and parasites have it out for Trump most of all and have just about the biggest incentive to make sure he doesn’t win. For if he winds up being the Republican nominee, and does even just a wee tiny bit better among both blacks and Hispanics versus the Democrat nominee than Romney did versus Obama among them, then that ruins a whole lot of conventional wisdom and makes the consultants look like the deceitful frauds peddling political pseudo-science on behalf of donors that I already knew they are. Even if Trump does no better or even worse among NAMs, but wins the election based on more white voters, that ruins the beltway consultant narratives as well.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off

WDBJ-TV SHOOTING – BRYCE WILLIAMS SHOOTER – TWITTER VIDEO

Posted on August 26, 2015 by Luke Ford

Chaim Amalek writes: “Also gay. Gay and black and gunning for whites. Not the narrative the MSM likes to have to cover (the victims were reporters, so they can’t ignore this):”

A man claiming to be Bryce Williams called ABC News over the last few weeks, saying he wanted to pitch a story, and wanted to fax information. He never told ABC News what the story was.
This morning, a fax was in the machine (time stamped 8:26 a.m.) almost two hours after the shooting. A little after 10 a.m., he called again, and introduced himself as Bryce, but also said his legal name was Vester Lee Flanagan, and that he shot two people this morning. While on the phone, he said authorities are “after me,” and “all over the place.” He hung up. ABC News contacted the authorities immediately and provided them with the fax.
In the 23-page document faxed to ABC News, the writer says “MY NAME IS BRYCE WILLIAMS” and his legal name is Vester Lee Flanagan II.” He writes what triggered today’s carnage was his reaction to the racism of the Charleston church shooting:
“Why did I do it? I put down a deposit for a gun on 6/19/15. The Church shooting in Charleston happened on 6/17/15…”
“What sent me over the top was the church shooting. And my hollow point bullets have the victims’ initials on them.”
Ex-Employee Caught in Connection to On-Air Shooting
Alison Parker and Adam Ward, Slain Virginia Reporter and Cameraman, ‘Did Great Work Every Day’
What We Know About Suspect Vester Lee Flanagan in Virginia On-Air Shooting
It is unclear whose initials he is referring to. He continues, “As for Dylann Roof? You (deleted)! You want a race war (deleted)? BRING IT THEN YOU WHITE …(deleted)!!!” He said Jehovah spoke to him, telling him to act.
Later in the manifesto, the writer quotes the Virginia Tech mass killer, Seung Hui Cho, calls him “his boy,” and expresses admiration for the Columbine High School killers. “Also, I was influenced by Seung–Hui Cho. That’s my boy right there. He got NEARLY double the amount that Eric Harris and Dylann Klebold got…just sayin.'”
In an often rambling letter to the authorities, and family and friends, he writes of a long list of grievances. In one part of the document, Williams calls it a “Suicide Note for Friends and Family.”
He says has suffered racial discrimination, sexual harassment and bullying at work
He says he has been attacked by black men and white females
He talks about how he was attacked for being a gay, black man
“Yes, it will sound like I am angry…I am. And I have every right to be. But when I leave this Earth, the only emotion I want to feel is peace….”
“The church shooting was the tipping point…but my anger has been building steadily…I’ve been a human powder keg for a while…just waiting to go BOOM!!!!”

Link to shooter video.

REPORT: A gunman killed a reporter and cameraman while they were doing a live TV news report in Franklin County, Virginia, Wednesday morning.

CBS News reports that the suspect is being identified by police as Vester Flanagan, who was also known by the name Bryce Williams when he was a reporter at the station, WDBJ-TV.

A first-person video of the shooting was posted on a Twitter account labeled @bryce_williams7 that has since been suspended.

Alison Parker, 24, and videographer Adam Ward, 27, were killed.

A work-related rant was posted on the Twitter account before the video:

The incident took place at Bridgewater Plaza in Franklin County. Parker was interviewing Vicki Gardner, head of the Smith Mountain Lake Regional Chamber of Commerce, when gunshots begin to ring out. Parker and Gardner are seen running away while the camera, held by Ward, appears to be dropped.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has joined the manhunt, along with local authorities.

“We heard screaming and then we heard nothing,” Jeff Marks, the station’s general manager, said during the WDBJ broadcast.

The Roanoke Times reports that Gardner was shot in the back and is in surgery.

A still image of the suspect was taken from video that was recorded by a WDBJ camera:

Parker was in a relationship with station anchor Chris Hurst, while Ward was engaged to one of the station’s producers.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off