‘HRC: Invade the world, invite the world, and tell all the world’s men to use the women’s restrooms.’

Posted on May 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* I look forward to Steve’s appointment to a position in the Trump administration. I’d say a policy-making position, but I think there’s a big opening for “noticing” positions.

* [Stephen] Miller is part of the Sailer generation. Having followed him fairly closely, including speeches he’s given, I’d be shocked if he isn’t a long-time reader of yours. He’s one of Sessions’ top guys and now he’s one of Trump’s top advisors.

* What Trump is going to force on liberals and the media and the punditry is the exposure of the naked body of identity politics in the left and in the Democratic Party. By virtually all usual measures — with one notable exception — Trump will, on balance, match Hillary along the standard left/right continuum, giving her no traction against him.

The exception, of course, is immigration. But the objections to him on that score, as always with immigration, are based entirely on the premise that if you oppose immigration in any fashion, it can only be because you are a racist. Remarkably, Trump isn’t even opposed to Affirmative Action, and has, it seems, never said anything about blacks that might be considered racist (imagine how much we would be hearing about it if he had).

So the utterly deranged opposition he has received from the left and the media is poised on the absurdly narrow point of his problems with immigration in its current form. That really is the sum total of their “argument” against him.

By exposing the true core of the left/media ideology, Trump is presenting a very clear choice to the American people (and indirectly the larger world): is nothing genuinely important to you other than identity politics? Are all other issues just window dressing to put in front of the one thing you really want to buy and sell: an obsession with who and whom?

Steve Guest writes on The Daily Caller:

Appearing on “CNN Newsroom,” on Thursday, Baldwin asked [Trump strategist Stephen] Miller to respond to Clinton’s allegation that Trump is not qualified to be president.

Miller replied, “We obviously agree with Bernie Sanders that Hillary Clinton isn’t qualified to be president.”

Pivoting, Miller said, “But I have to say honestly I feel bad for Bernie Sanders supporters, and I’ll tell you why. Thanks to superdelegates, the Democratic Party is on the verge of nominating the most pro-war, pro-Wall Street lawmaker in the modern history of the Democratic Party.”

“I mean, that’s amazing. Think about it. You have a candidate in Hillary who is running on a pro-war platform about what she did in Libya, about what she’s doing in Syria, about the toppling of the Egyptian regime and the military of course took back control, who’s running on a pro-wall Street, pro-war agenda. That’s not the right fit for the Democratic Party or the country.”

“OK, let’s not discuss, I don’t want to argue Benghazi with you. I know there’s a lot of pieces there,” Baldwin said. “Just back though on the question as to whether or not [Clinton] thinks Donald Trump is qualified, can you directly respond to that?”

Miller replied, “Well, like I said, Bernie Sanders is correct and Hillary Clinton is not qualified to be president.”

Baldwin followed up again, “Do you think Hillary Clinton is qualified to be president?”

Laughing, Miller said, “Of course not. See, look at her judgement. Hillary Clinton went to war in Iraq. Hillary Clinton’s decisions in Libya unleashed an operating base for ISIS that will be a scourge of terrorism against the entire Western world. Hillary Clinton’s platform is, I want to start wars in the Middle East and then import all the refugees into the United States and other countries without knowing who they are. That is a recipe for disaster.”

* Stephen Miller has a bit of shitlord in him, the hint he showed during the lacrosse incident. I almost pity that someone like him was probably a little too caught up in Student Government during his time at Duke instead of using his time to really lead a pushback against administrators

It’s sad, we did have Greeks as student government presidents and even Greeks in a few of the important posts, but the guys who did this shit reminded me a lot of the standard cucks of the Republican party. A lot of Dean Vernon-ing going on regardless.

I almost want to say it’s better that he was a wasted talent during his college years. He might have gotten too much ass and not be motivated enough to do this stuff.

* Trump and some of his spokesmen have mentioned this but none have gone into it in juicy detail: Much is made of Hillary’s “experience”, i.e., the manifold opportunities she has been given to demonstrate her worthiness to hold high office, largely as a result of her marriage to a successful politician. But more important is how abysmally, terrifyingly badly she has performed every time she has been given such opportunities. I think Trump’s campaign ought to make a list and recite it at every possible opportunity from now until November.

I have posted this elsewhere but it’s worth repeating:

A partial, chronological list from the public record of instances of Hilary Clinton’s corruption, poor judgement, and political and policy failures:

(1) Failed DC bar exam;
(2) Expelled from Watergate investigation staff for lying and other unethical behavior;
(3) Involved in a series of financial scandals as Arkansas’s first “lady”;
(4) Both initiated and botched the Whitewater coverup;
(5) Put in charge of crafting the Clinton health insurance policy initiative then failed in a disastrous way that put off the possibilities of another Democrat bill for twenty years;
(6) Partnered with Bill in admitting Poland to NATO, starting a new round of unnecessary hostilities with Russia. [George Kennon describes this as one of the greatest diplomatic blunders of the 20th century.];
(7) Was losing NY senate election until Bill stepped in;
(8) Lost a “sure thing” presidential presidential nomination to the relatively unknown Obama;
(9) Within two weeks of becoming Secretary of State committed an epic diplomatic faux pas that caused Whitehall to publicly and officially repudiate the century long “special relation” between the UK and the USA;
(10) A bit later her incredibly stupid “reset button” gimmick publicly embarrassed Russian officials and widened the rift the Clintons had so assiduously created;
(11) Fomented, aided and abetted the so-called “Arab Spring” which has permanently destabilized much of North Africa;
(12) Fomented the overthrow of Qadafi in Libya which has turned that country into a failed anarchic mess and a haven for Islamo-fascist terrorists and helped spread terrorist movements like Boko Haram into much of central Africa;
(13) Failed utterly to protect US diplomats in Benghazi and lied through her teeth about the causes of that disaster and the role she played in it;
(14) While Secretary she violated an oath she took after being trained in how to handle classified materials, violated directly several section of the USC regarding the handling of such materials, and as a result exposed many US humint and elint inteligence sources [people may have died as a result];
(15) While Secretary her office and underlings negotiated deals with individuals and groups from which Clinton or her “foundation” had received emoluments, giving at least the appearance of pay-to-play and once again violating provisions of the USC.

Posted in America, Steve Sailer | Comments Off on ‘HRC: Invade the world, invite the world, and tell all the world’s men to use the women’s restrooms.’

WP: Hillary Clinton’s email problems just got much worse

Posted on May 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

The FIX: One of the two big dominoes in the Hillary Clinton email controversy toppled today: The State Department’s inspector general released its report on the email practices of Clinton and a number of other past secretaries of state. (The other major domino is, of course, the FBI investigation into Clinton’s decision to exclusively use a private email server while serving as the nation’s top diplomat.)

The report, which you can read in its entirety here, badly complicates Clinton’s past explanations about the server and whether she complied fully with the laws in place governing electronic communication. And it virtually ensures that Clinton’s email practices will be front and center in Donald Trump’s fusillade of attacks against her credibility and honesty between now and Nov. 8.

Here’s the key passage from the Roz Helderman and Tom Hamburger’s article on the report:

The inspector general, in a long awaited review obtained Wednesday by The Washington Post in advance of its publication, found that Clinton’s use of private email for public business was “not an appropriate method” of preserving documents and that her practices failed to comply with department policies meant to ensure that federal record laws are followed.

The report says Clinton, who is the Democratic presidential front-runner, should have printed and saved her emails during her four years in office or surrendered her work-related correspondence immediately upon stepping down in February 2013. Instead, Clinton provided those records in December 2014, nearly two years after leaving office.

Clinton used an inappropriate method of preserving her documents. Her approach would not have been approved if it had been requested by a more junior member of the State Department staff. The report also suggests that despite a Clinton aide’s insistence that the method of preserving her emails had been submitted to a legal review back in 2010, there is no evidence that such a review took place. And, here’s the kicker: Clinton refused to sit for a formal interview.

Oomph. Double oomph. Heck, that might merit a triple oomph.

This is a bad day for Clinton’s presidential campaign. Period. For a candidate already struggling to overcome a perception that she is neither honest nor trustworthy, the IG report makes that task significantly harder. No one will come out of this news cycle — with the exception of the hardest of the hard-core Clinton people — believing she is a better bet for the presidency on May 25 than she was on May 23.

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on WP: Hillary Clinton’s email problems just got much worse

Who Was The First American President To Bomb White People?

Posted on May 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* One recalls the comment about Bill Clinton being the first American President since FDR to bomb white people, as if that was a good thing.

Now he is bombing people in Paris by proxy.

Bill-Clinton-Statue-e1353944221447

* The photograph of the statue of Bill Clinton in front of a pawn shop in Rapid City is priceless. I don’t know how much better it could be, unless it was in front of a massage parlor in Reno.

* Here’s a question for Donald Trump to bring up on the campaign trail: If the First Amendment – in it’s present “Separation of Church and State” interperetation – is taken to mean that state and local governments and the federal government can not subsidize the practice of religion, then why do we permit foreign governments to do so?

* Forget about Clinton – what this shows is that Saudi Arabia is the #1 driver of Islamic terrorism. The most insane thing that the West has done in the last 100 years was to take a fanatical but impoverished desert cult, promote them to the leadership of an entire country in favor of the traditional (and relatively moderate) Hashemite dynasty and then given them TRILLIONS of dollars of oil money with which to spread their crazy version of Islam and then allow them to open mosques and madrassahs to spread their hateful ideology all over the world (especially in places with vulnerable Islamic youth) in the guise of religious freedom. Each step along the way made sense (sort of, not really) but when you combine all of these factors together you get global terrorism on steroids and yet the Saudis are still supposed to be our “friends”.

And due to the impoverishment of most Muslim populations (except where there is oil) which in turn caused by their low IQ and inbreeding, high birth rates, corruption and overall failure to thrive in conditions of modernity, there are vulnerable Muslim youths all over the globe, both in Muslim majority countries and also in alienated Muslim populations in the West.

The statues of Clinton all look like department store dummies. It shows you how hard it is to do realistic representational art well without it looking like kitsch.

* The hatewaves emitted by Trump’s moratorium on all Muslim immigration, in addition to radicalizing every Muslim in the present, have (because of their extreme high-energy) also gone back in time and radicalized the Muslims of the past, making him ultimately responsible for the thwarted Fort Dix attack planned by several Albanian Muslim (illegal) immigrants in 2007.

A bit off-topic, but another animal satisfaction I’ll get from Trump thrashing Hillary in the general election, should it so transpire, is the reverse revision of Bill’s status as a smooth, glamorous, latter-day Don Juan, beloved of all desirable and good women. This notion got going in the afterglow of his post-impeachment “victory” and the general peace & prosperity “era of good feelings” ambience of late 90′s America.

I don’t know how much of this was astroturfing by feminist freaks of the “I’d blow him if he keeps abortion legal” variety, but I do remember many fawning lifestyle pieces on Clinton in the early 2000′s showing him in the company of several different (relatively) attractive women not his wife, and it was all wink-wink, nudge-nudge, if-Hillary-don’t-mind-who-are-we-to-judge, and ain’t-he-just-the-world’s-biggest-dreamboat!

The recent “hit-piece” on Trump and his womanizing in the NEW YORK TIMES by two nerdy Millenials, and Camille Paglia’s excellent rebuttal to it, instantly jarred me from the ain’t-Bill-just-the-sweetest-heartthrob media programming of the last 15 years. Take a look at that banquet photo of Trump and Rowanne Brewer. Now that is star power! That is glamour! It exposes Bill’s womanizing with frankly unattractive, overweight, and under-age females- many of whom he had to borderline sexually assault- as the unsmooth moves of the creepy, pathetic loser he really is.

Yeah, none of this should matter if we lived in Plato’s ideal philosopher-king republic, but we don’t, and the propaganda that so many Democratic Presidents have been glamorous ladykillers and that- by extension- you, Republican primary voter over there- must be some kind of bitter, woman-hating loser, has high-time reached the point where it deserves demolishing.

* I am feeling awfully fuzzy and optimistic today as I contemplate the fact that we may be less than a year away from having a president who will end Muslim and other dysgenic immigration, opposes stupid middle east wars but loves our military and loves Israel, and will stop the left from taking over the Supreme Court and the few remaining Circuit Courts they do not control.

Trump is now, for the first time, officially in the lead with poll averages!

These are all things Trump can do his first 100 days. For the Supreme Court, he may have a Dem senate majority stopping him from appointing a young Scalia, but there are plenty of other bland and inoffensive Republicans who can get the mere 1 or 2 or so Dem votes to be approved.

For the wall, he already has a great plan to start: immediately impose fees of Mexican remittances and use them to fund the parts of the border fence that are authorized to be built but were never provided funding. Maybe other standard immigration process fees can be increased. As long as the law does not have a specific amount, the implication is the amount is set by the exec branch.

Likewise, current law already gives the president the power to suspend immigration from specific countries. I doubt Trump can specifically get away with “no Muslim immigration.” But 98% as good is “no somalia, saudi, yemeni, syrian, pakistani, etc immigration.”

I just had a look at Hillary’s campaign website. Yuck, the design and colors are really bad. Even worse is the content of her agenda. My comments in CAPS, everything else is a direct quotation from her “issues” pages.

—

– MAKING AMERICA LESS SAFE, SIDING WITH CRIMINALS OVER CITIZENS –

1. FORCE BUSINESSES TO HIRE FELONS, AND LET THE FELONS AND GOVERNMENT SUE BUSINESSES THAT DON’T HIRE THEM

Taking executive action to “ban the box” for federal employers and contractors, so that applicants have an opportunity to demonstrate their qualifications before being asked about their criminal records.

2. LET RAPISTS AND MURDERERS CANCEL OUT YOUR VOTE

Supporting legislation to restore voting rights to individuals who have served their sentences.

3. IMMEDIATELY RELEASE MANY “NON-VIOLENT” FEDERAL PRISON INMATES (DON’T FORGET MANY VIOLENT FELONS TAKE A PLEA DEAL FOR A NON-VIOLENT OFFENSE THAT STILL PUTS THEM AWAY FOR A LONG TIME.)

Applying Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 retroactively to allow current nonviolent prisoners to seek fairer sentences.

4. PORK SPENDING FOR TOUCHY-FEELING LEFT-WING INDOCTRINATION OF POLICE

Doubling funding for the U.S. Department of Justice “Collaborative Reform” program to provide technical assistance and training to agencies that undertake voluntary efforts toward transformational reform of their police departments. Across the country, there are police departments deploying creative and effective strategies that we can learn from and build on.

5. INCREASE FEDERAL HARRASSMENT OF LOCAL POLICE, FORCING THEM TO RESPOND TO MORE FEDERAL SUBPOENAS AND COLLECT MORE DATA TO BE USED IN ANTI-POLICE LAWSUITS

Strengthening the U.S. Department of Justice’s pattern or practice unit by increasing resources, working to secure subpoena power, and improving data collection for pattern or practice investigations.

6. PROUDLY ANNOUCES SUPPORT OF VIOLENT DRUG DEALER TRAYVON MARTIN’S MOTHER

Read more: Sybrina Fulton shares why she’s supporting Hillary

7. DO AN END-RUN AROUND THE 2ND AMENDMENT BY LETTING PEOPLE SUE GUN COMPANIES OUT OF BUSINESS

Hillary believes the gun industry must be held accountable for violence perpetrated with their guns. Hillary will lead the charge to repeal the so-called “Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act,” a dangerous law that prevents victims of gun violence from holding negligent manufacturers and dealers accountable for violence perpetrated with their guns.

– DEMOGRAPHIC DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA –

1. DEFEND OBAMA’S EXECUTIVE AMNESTIES OF ABOUT 60% OF CURRENT ILLEGALS, AND “EXPAND” THEM FURTHER

Defend President Obama’s executive actions to provide deportation relief for DREAMers and parents of Americans and lawful residents, and extend those actions to additional persons with sympathetic cases if Congress refuses to act.

2. IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF UNACCOMPENIED MINORS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH CHILDREN WHO ILLEGALLY ENTER THE USA AND MAKE A BS ASYLUM CLAIM (MOST DO NOT EVEN SHOW UP TO THE FIRST ASYLUM HEARING, THEY JUST DISAPPEAR AND START WORKING ILLEGALLY OR COMMITTING CRIME)

End family detention and close private immigrant detention centers.

3. SIGN A RUBIO STYLE IMMEDIATE AMNESTY FOR ALL ILLEGALS PLUS A PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP

As president, Hillary will fight for comprehensive immigration reform that provides a full and equal path to citizenship, treats every person with dignity, upholds the rule of law, protects our borders and national security, and brings millions of hardworking people into the formal economy.

4. CHANGE THE RULE THAT VIOLATORS OF IMMIGRATION LAWS CANNOT APPLY FOR CITIZENSHIP UNLESS THEY GO HOME FIRST

End the 3- and 10-year bars. Current immigration law forces families—especially those whose members have different citizenship or immigration statuses—into a heartbreaking dilemma: pursue a green card by leaving the country and your loved ones behind, or remain in the shadows. Hillary will call on Congress to repeal the 3- and 10-year bars to keep families together.

5. MAKE MORE POOR PEOPLE WHO DON’T SPEAK ENGLISH CITIZENS SO THEY CAN CANCEL YOUR VOTE AND COLLECT ALL WELFARE BENEFITS

there are an estimated 9 million lawful permanent residents (green card holders) in the United States who are eligible to become U.S. citizens. Hillary believes we need to do more to help the millions of people who are eligible for citizenship to take that last step. She will work to expand fee waivers so more people can get a break on costs, increase access to robust language programs to help people boost their English proficiency, and enhance outreach and education so more people are informed about their options and engaged in the process.

– HILLARY’S PLANS TO TAX-N-STEAL THE MONEY YOU EARNED AND SPEND IT ON CRONIES, PORK, AND THE ANTI-WHITE/ANTI-AMERICA EDUCATION-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX –

1. $20 BILLION IN “JOBS” WELFARE THAT IS “TARGETED” TO RACISTLY EXCLUDE WHITES AND ASIANS

Her plan includes $20 billion to create youth jobs, particularly for African American, Native American, and Latino youth;

2. $5 BILLION FOR MAKE-WORK JOBS FOR CRIMINALS

$5 billion to create reentry programs that will help formerly incarcerated Americans get back on their feet when they return to society

3. $25 BILLION IN SMALL BUSINESS LOANS FOR “UNDERSERVED COMMUNITIES,” AKA, “NONE FOR YOU WHITE BOY”

$25 billion to support entrepreneurship and small business growth in underserved communities.

4. YET ANOTHER $25 BILLION IN TAXES TAKEN FROM WHITES AND GIVEN TO MINORITIES FOR HOUSING PROGRAMS

$25 billion to remove blight from neighborhoods, remove barriers to sustainable homeownership, and connect affordable housing to economic opportunity. Centuries of housing discrimination have excluded people of color from the mainstream mortgage market and cut families off from communities with high-performing schools, safe streets, and good-paying jobs.

5. YET ANOTHER $25 BILLION TAKEN FROM WHITE TAXPAYERS AND RACISTLY EXCLUDE THEM IN FAVOR OF “HISTORICALLY BLACK” AND “MSI” COLLEGES (MSI MEANS MINORITY SERVING INSTITUTIONS)

A $25 billion fund will support HBCUs, HSIs, and other MSIs serving a high percentage of Pell Grant recipients to help lower the cost of attendance and improve student outcomes at low-cost, modest-endowment nonprofit private schools.

* Trump is walking a fine line now that he’s in General Election mode, he was hardline on immigration in the primaries and now he’s going to try to sooth feathers, which means that his rhetoric is going to be softer and this is going to worry the immigration hardliners. Mickey Kaus is already worried about Trump backtracking on immigration like he’s doing with the Muslim Ban. Add Kobach to the ticket and Trump’s choice sends a signal on immigration that personnel are key, so along with Kobach there will be Stephen Miller and Senator Sessions. This troika is not going to roll-over on immigration thus giving Trump a freer hand to talk gently with all the hothouse flowers out there.

From Kobach’s perspective, I’m thinking that this results in him leapfrogging hundreds of aspiring politicians and because it’s the Don’s doing, loyalty to the Don is expected on whatever it is that Trump actually wants to do with Trumpism.

The VP slot is a weird position. High in symbolism, low in operational authority. Having watched Kobach debate on immigration, I don’t have any doubt that he’d be formidable in the VP debates and on the campaign trail.

Everyone with stature comes with baggage and because Trump is trying to distance himself from Establishment Republicanism, the last thing he needs is baggage. That appeals to the non-Republicans. What appeals to the Republicans is that Kobach hits many of their ideological sweet spots without bringing national recognition and baggage. People already have opinions on Gingrich, Portman, Christie and I’m not sure what these guys bring, in terms of political capital, that appeals to people who are being swayed by Trump for they represent the old Republican Party that alienated these very voters. The Democrats have a harder time attacking someone like Kobach because he doesn’t have a high profile. The lack of high profile is immaterial to Trump because a nomination gives him de facto high profile plus it guarantees weeks of talking heads talking about Trump reaching down below the top tier and pulling out a star player. Moreover, it let’s Trump set the media agenda after the announcement because the media is unprepared for someone like Kobach and so while they’re scrambling to develop a narrative, Trump is already pushing out his narrative.

I can’t see any upside for Trump in choosing an established politician, now he takes on the baggage of whomever he chooses and they have an independent power base and they could undermine Trump within the Party.

Posted in Europe | Comments Off on Who Was The First American President To Bomb White People?

Zakia Belkhiri Took a Selfie of anti-Semitism on the Left

Posted on May 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

Another Jewish woman has a hard time understanding that different groups have different interests.

The Coalition of the Fringe (the make-up of all left of center parties in the West) may be fraying.

From Haaretz:

Last week a Belgian Muslim named Zakia Belkhiri posted a cheeky selfie that nearly broke the social justice internet. Belkhiri, an attractive young hijab-wearing woman, took a picture of herself flashing a peace sign in front of a wall of anti-Muslim protesters. Her sly smile in the face of overwhelming hate caught the attention of millions and the picture went viral. Her message was powerful — the antidote to hate was not more hate, but laughter. 
I was one of thousands who shared Belkhiri’s snap on various social media platforms. I’m a part of the Jon Stewart generation. When confronted with the fact-resistant, primal pleasures of hatred (so notably practiced by Fox News) the obvious answer is righteous laughter. 
Belkhiri’s photo wasn’t just funny in the way it cut anti-Islamic protesters down to size. There was something moving about the image. The French philosopher Emmanuel Lévinas wrote that it is the face-to-face encounter that makes us responsible to each other — “the face is what forbids us to kill.” Belkhiri’s selfie hinted at a vulnerability in tension with the frivolity inherent in the selfie, something that might make each side see each other as human, rather than monolithic. It was a deeply hopeful moment of distinctly contemporary resistance. 
Only a few beats in the news cycle later came the disappointment. The inevitably incriminating social media was dug up, complicating the nervy woman in the selfie. Numerous tweets and Facebook posts showed Belkhiri might be against Islamophobia, but also unashamedly dabbling in anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism. Her most devastating tweet being “Hitler didn’t kill all the Jews, he left some. So we know why he was killing them. #fuckrs.” As the news filtered out about Belkhiri, I was disappointed, but not surprised.  
The Belkhiri story illustrates the failure of intersectionality, perhaps the most important critical tool of the New Left. 
Intersectional analysis understands oppression as multi-dimensional and privilege as contingent. A white Jewish woman in America may experience white privilege, but she still has to fight against sexism and global anti-Semitism. 
Yet, over and over, Jews and Jewish oppression get left out of that intersectional analysis. Jewishness is conflated with whiteness, with the bizarre results of seeing the Holocaust described (and dismissed) in certain circles, as “white on white” crime. 
Belkhiri’s stumble wasn’t an exception in the contemporary social justice narrative, it was another example of how the global Left systematically fails to include the Jewish struggle for self-determination both cultural and political within its framework of national and personal liberations. 
After World War II, particularly in America, anti-Semitism was often seen as no more than a distasteful kind of bourgeois country club exclusion, a result of Jews’ perceived operationalizing of postwar economic mobility and white privilege. It was not taken seriously as a real threat to individuals, their bodies and livelihoods, or as a threat to a minority group’s right to practice its religious, cultural or national expression.
The New Left has always had its ‘Jewish problem’, something we’re seeing in the latest flap within the British Labour Party. Today it’s often boiled down to the question of whether anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism. But the problem isn’t anti-Zionism, it’s the obsessive focus on the Jewish state to the exclusion of much else.

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on Zakia Belkhiri Took a Selfie of anti-Semitism on the Left

REPORT: Migrants Committing Disproportionately High Crime In Germany While Media And Govt Focus on ‘Far Right’ Thought Crimes

Posted on May 25, 2016 by Luke Ford

Breitbart: A massive, migrant crime wave is surging across Germany according to figures buried in a new report released by the country’s Interior Ministry. The data reveals that without migrants considered, crime rates in Germany would have remained roughly static since 2014. But, in fact, the country recorded an extra 402,741 crimes committed by migrants.
While much of this criminality concerned illegal border crossings, German authorities instead talked up a “record surge” in crimes by “right wing radicals”.

Concerning statistics from the 135-page report reveal that 70 per cent of pickpocketing, one of the crime types on the rise, was committed by non-Germans. Of this figure, 34 per cent was committed by recent asylum seekers, with the rest committed by “non-Germans”.

Foreign nationals are thought to account for around 11 or 12 per cent of the total population of Germany, but were over-represented in every area of crime.

Illegal immigrants and asylum seekers account for around 2.5 per cent of Germany’s population, but were also massively overrepresented.

Amongst total offences, non-Germans accounted for 27.6 percent while illegal immigrants and asylum seekers accounted for 5.7 percent. Of homicides, the figures are 29.3%/8.2%, and of sexual assaults, the figures were 20.5%/4.8%.

In all of these cases as well as those indicated in the chart below, non-Germans and illegal migrants outstripped their proportions of crime to their representation in German society.

Non-Germans accounted for 38 per cent of all robberies, 38 per cent of thefts, and 43 per cent of thefts that involved a level of aggravation such as assault or force.

They accounted for 40.2 per cent of burglaries, 43.5 per cent of shoplifting, and a whopping 75.7 of pick pocketing or purse snatching.

Posted in Germany | Comments Off on REPORT: Migrants Committing Disproportionately High Crime In Germany While Media And Govt Focus on ‘Far Right’ Thought Crimes