October 29, 2015 White Autogenocide Is A Massive Loss Of Frame Luke Ford No sacred cows.

White Autogenocide Is A Massive Loss Of Frame

Posted on October 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

From the Chateau: Framing and reframing are core Game concepts that every Chateau guest should by now understand and have internalized. The topic has been discussed frequently here at CH, and deserves that level of scrutiny because framing has broader applications beyond seducing women.

A frame is a system of interpretation that an individual or group uses to understand a certain event/situation.
Frame is important in pickup, because it communicates the PUA’s mindset as well as the underlying psychology behind his words and actions. For example, Swinggcat advocates a “prizing” frame, whereby the PUA always assumes the girl is interested in him as the prize. In this frame, a chick can say, “I really like the tie”. The PUA can respond, “Thank you, slow down a little bit. At least buy me a drink before you hit on me like that.” […]
“Framing”, [or frame control], in the context of media studies, sociology and psychology, refers to the social construction of a social phenomenon by mass media sources or specific political or social movements or organizations. It is an inevitable process of selective influence over the individual’s perception.
In pickup, as with mass media, there are always certain levels of interpretation of a specific event that can be reframed based on frame control, and your emotions and conviction in your beliefs.

Pay attention to that word conviction. It’s critical to knowing why cuckservatives are so cucked, and why they can’t ever seem to go on the offense against anti-White leftoids.

For now, a helpful (and amended) reminder of a relevant CH maxim:

Maxim #45: Any conversation with a woman/leftoid/Hivemind jackboot that is not explicitly framed by you to maximize your perceived status will lead to her/the leftoid/the Hivemind forming a negative perception of your value over time.

Which brings us to a comment left by reader Moses,

I’ve said it before and I’m gonna keep saying it:
White self-immolation is nothing more than a loss of frame on a massive scale.
When whites began elevating other groups’ interests of White interests it was a loss of frame on a societal level.
Other ethnic groups saw an opportunity to exploit White guilt and did so — and continue to do so — brilliantly.
Non-Whites have only the power that Whites give to them. It’s true that Whites deserve whatever they get. And they will get it good and hard.

Moses is right. A massive loss of frame will not just send you home alone a (self-)beaten incel; it will also send your civilization and your race to an incel defeat.

Posted in America, Whites | Comments Off

Republican Elites Settle On Marco Rubio

Posted on October 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes: After the 2012 election, the GOP Brain Trust decided the highest priority was to run a Presidential candidate who was obviously all on board with electing a new people. Granted, mostly old white people vote in Republican primaries, but are you going to let little things like elections stand in the way of a strategic masterplan?

The experts initially settled upon Latino-in-Law Jeb Bush on the grounds that Jeb’s Mommy Issues that led him to marry the woman in the world least like ol’ Barb made him the perfect fit. But those pesky Republican voters have so far failed to grasp the palpable brilliance of this strategy. So last night the experts shifted their allegiance from the Latino-in-Law to the Birthright Latino.

Comments:

* Barbara and Columba ended up being more alike than he bargained for – both moody, lonely women whom Jeb considered his duty to try to placate and tiptoe around. Barbara anguished about her rapid loss of youthful beauty as HW globetrotted and flirted around during the 1960s-70s, and Columba dealt with homesickness and culture shock. They both put the weight of the world on Jeb’s dutiful shoulders.

Posted in Republicans | Comments Off

American Stupidity

Posted on October 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes: Commenter notsaying observes:

We [Americans] are still strikingly unable to process the thought that changing facts on the ground re immigration may require a change in our laws and regulations — as well as our expectations and attitudes. The ideas that many American have that because we used to take in lots of people we must always do so and that because illegal immigration is bad that therefore all legal immigration is good are very strong.

It would be hugely beneficial if Americans realized they could change their minds about policies going forward without admitting they were wrong in the past. We’d have better policies in the future if pundits could come out and say, I was in favor of X in the past and I was right, but now conditions have changed, so I no longer favor X.

In particular, we’d be better off with more Declare-Victory-and-Go-Home decisions. Vastly increasing immigration has done wonders for availability of ethnic food, but the marginal returns on that have been diminishing steadily. Why not declare victory and go home?

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off

A YouTube account is rewriting Disney tunes to be racist

Posted on October 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

From Fusion:

There’s a song in the movie Mulan, “I’ll Make a Man Out of You.” You’ve probably heard it; it begins “Let’s get down to business! To defeat the Huns.”

In the ultra-conservative parody version rewritten by Uncuck The Right, the song starts “Let’s get down to business! To defeat the Left.” That version goes on to cheerfully explain to never “punch rightward,” and to never “be afraid to discuss White interests.”

It’s a singalong, one of Uncuck the Right’s increasingly popular parody Disney tunes. The videos are meant to appeal to and unite the alt-right, a loosely defined coalition of self-described racists, Dark Enlightenment adherents, and ardent social conservatives, among others.

The songs, with their discussions of white supremacy and generally racist and sexist lyrics, would be horrifying to most viewers. But when I asked the creator of Uncuck the Right (hereafter UTR) about them, he responded with a provocation:

“What you feel when watching my videos is the same thing I feel when I watch John Oliver”

I don’t know much about UTR as a person. When I contacted him via his YouTube channel and asked if I could interview him he obliged, but said that “for security reasons” ( he couldn’t talk on the phone or over Skype.

What he was willing to say, over email, is that he’s “a young white man who is tired of seeing his people celebrate their dispossession.” Liberal as a kid, reading Austrian economics moved him towards libertarianism; the failure of Ron Paul’s 2012 presidential campaign moved him even farther to the right. He says he’s been posting in /pol/, the 4chan and 8chan’s anarchic, often right-leaning “Politically Incorrect” boards, for years. But his decision to get more actively involved with the alt right came this summer “when the cuckservative meme became big and the Alt Right started to explode.”

That also coincided with a name change from prodicusthegod (a reference to an obscure Greek philosopher) to Uncuck the Right.

“Cuckservative” is a portmanteau, of “cuckold” and “conservative,” which has been around for years, but whose popularity ballooned this summer. As The New Republic’s Jeet Heer explained, it “emerged out of the white supremacist movement as a term of abuse for white conservatives deemed race traitors unwilling to forthrightly defend the interests of white America.” For his part UTR prefers the term “white identitarian” because, as he puts it, “‘white nationalist’ evokes certain imagery in the popular consciousness that is incongruous with my ideology”

In two months he’s posted 12 videos, which have garnered 147,864 views and 2,356 subscribers as of this writing. He’s not the first among the alt right to re-write songs, but he is one of the most successful. So far all his videos are parodies of Disney songs, though he says he plans “to expand to other show tunes in the future.”

(At this point, a disclosure: ABC/Disney is one of Fusion’s parent companies, along with Univision. I contacted Disney for comment on the videos, but they have yet to respond to my request.)

The most popular of UTR’s parodies by far is titled “This is Dildoween,”a re-dubbed version of the opening tune of The Nightmare Before Christmas. In the UTR version the denizens of Halloween Town are caricatures of Latin American immigrants, Hollywood producers, and college professors melodically explaining their promotion of a medley of different alt-right fears that include increasing immigration, “cultural marxism,” and sexual liberation.

Posted in Race | Comments Off

The Brilliance Of Obama’s 2008 Race Speech

Posted on October 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

Charles Murray writes for NRO’s The Corner in 2008: “I read the various posts here on “The Corner,” mostly pretty ho-hum or critical about Obama’s speech. Then I figured I’d better read the text (I tried to find a video of it, but couldn’t). I’ve just finished. Has any other major American politician ever made a speech on race that comes even close to this one? As far as I’m concerned, it is just plain flat out brilliant–rhetorically, but also in capturing a lot of nuance about race in America. It is so far above the standard we’re used to from our pols…. But you know me. Starry-eyed Obama groupie.”

Posted in Blacks, Charles Murray | Comments Off

Towards An Honest Discussion About Race

Posted on October 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

Steve Sailer writes:

I have found that, in the African-American oral tradition, if the words are enunciated eloquently enough, no one examines the meaning for definitive truth.

—Biracial novelist Mat Johnson, Loving Day, 2015

America’s foremost public intellectual, Ta-Nehisi Coates, has published a new best-selling minibook, Between the World and Me, that’s interesting for what it reveals about a forbidden subject: the psychological damage done by pervasive black violence to soft, sensitive, bookish souls such as Coates. The Atlantic writer’s black radical parents forced the frightened child to grow up in Baltimore’s black community, where he lived in constant terror of the other boys. Any white person who wrote as intensely about how blacks scared him would be career-crucified out of his job, so it’s striking to read Coates recounting at length how horrible it is to live around poor blacks if you are a timid, retiring sort.

Coates’ lack of physical courage is a common and perfectly reasonable trait, although writers typically cover it up. For example, Hunter S. Thompson transmuted his recurrent paranoia about impending carnage (which beset him even in venues as family-friendly as the Circus-Circus casino) into hallucinatory comedy in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

Coates, however, is humorless. Worse, his fans have encouraged him to believe he is the second coming of James Baldwin, egging him on to indulge in a prophetic-hysteric-postmodern style that is easier to parody (e.g., just repeat endlessly the phrase “black bodies” and the distractingly stupid formulation “people who believe they are white”) than it is to endure over even the course of Coates’ very short second autobiography. (As with the president, both of Coates’ books are memoirs.)

“Coates has thus elaborated a theory of history in which everything bad ever done by blacks is the fault of American whites (whom he describes—metaphorically, I hope—as ‘cannibals’).”

White writers have seldom had the courage to confess their fear of black violence so fully, at least not since 1963, when Norman Podhoretz responded to the hullabaloo over James Baldwin with an essay about growing up in Brooklyn in the 1930s and 1940s:

And so for a long time I was puzzled to think that…Negroes were supposed to be persecuted when it was the Negroes who were doing the only persecuting I knew about—and doing it, moreover, to me…. A city boy’s world is contained within three or four square blocks, and in my world it was the whites, the Italians and Jews, who feared the Negroes, not the other way around. The Negroes were tougher than we were, more ruthless, and on the whole they were better athletes…. Yet my sister’s opinions, like print, were sacred, and when she told me about exploitation and economic forces I believed her. I believed her, but I was still afraid of Negroes.

In the 52 years since Podhoretz’s “My Negro Problem—And Ours,” overwhelming evidence has piled up validating the prescience of his boyhood traumas at the hands of black juvenile delinquents. But it’s precisely because the scale of black violence over the past half century is so blatantly obvious that white intellectuals have been largely self-silenced on the topic—even as the most cunning minds among today’s liberal whites plot to reverse the mistake their grandparents made in fearfully ceding much of the best urban turf to black criminality.

The central real estate question of this century has become: How can big cities drop their hot potato of poor urban blacks in the laps of naive suburbs and small towns? That helps explain the unhinged reaction among elites to Donald Trump publicly pointing out that Mexico isn’t sending us its highest-quality citizens to be our illegal aliens. The unspoken plan is to continue to use the more docile Hispanics newcomers to shove the more dangerous African-American citizens out of desirable cities; thus, only a class traitor like Trump would dare allude to the unfortunate side effects suffered by the rest of the country.

Despite all the violence Coates has suffered at the hands of other blacks, his racial loyalty remains admirably adamantine. Thus, his ploy, as psychologically transparent as it is popular with liberal whites, is to blame his lifelong petrified unhappiness on the white suburbanites he envied for being able to live far from black thugs.

Unfortunately for Coates’ persuasiveness, white people, unlike blacks, have never actually done anything terribly bad to him. The worst memory he can dredge up is the time an Upper West Side white woman pushed his 4-year-old son to get the dawdling kid to stop clogging an escalator exit. She even had the racist nerve to say, “Come on!”

Coates reacted as unreasonably as a guest star on Seinfeld would. Ever since this Escalator Incident, he’s been dwelling on how, while it might have looked like yet another example of blacks behaving badly, it was, when you stop to think about slavery and Crow (not to mention redlining), really all the fault of whites.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off

How The LA Times Plays Games With Race

Posted on October 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

David Cole Stein writes: I’ll give you a few genuine examples of how the media plays games with race, using my hometown paper of record, the L.A. Times (the paper with the fourth-largest circulation in the U.S.), as a case study. In July 2002, two Inglewood, Calif., cops were accused of roughing up a black gentleman. The Times trumpeted the story—two white cops beat an innocent black dude. Except that one of the cops, Bijan Darvish, was Persian. His LAPD file read “nonwhite/Persian.” Times ombudswoman Jamie Gold admitted to me that calling him white violated Times policy (“officers must be described as they are in their police file”), but she sent me several paragraphs of text arguing that Persians are white whether they admit it or not. Essentially, her argument was “we violated our policy, but we didn’t lie.”

“For the Times editors, this was a disaster. Thompson was black; Happe was not just white but blond.”

That’s pure artistry! Ginning up a white-on-black incident, maybe selling a few extra papers, maybe provoking a riot or two, but having a back-pocket rationalization to refute accusations of lying.

Another example is a front-page Times story from 2002 about a plague of black and Hispanic pedestrian deaths. Blacks and Hispanics were being run over at “disproportional” rates. Were racist L.A. drivers targeting people of color? As enticing a plotline for a 1970s blaxploitation film as that may be, there was a problem: In the article, the figures of black and Hispanic pedestrian deaths were shown individually, while the white and Asian figures were lumped together. When I requested the complete figures from Times writer Hugo Martin, it turned out that whites were not being spared pedestrian hit-and-run deaths, but Asians were hit by cars at such an abnormally low rate that by combining the Asian stats with the white stats it gave the impression that both races were mysteriously safe from being struck while crossing a street (yet another example of Asians throwing off a curve). Again, a ginned-up “blacks and Hispanics are being victimized” story, but not as the result of an outright lie. Rather, just a crafty combination of otherwise accurate figures. Pure artistry.

During the 2003 recall election that put Arnold Schwarzenegger in the governor’s mansion, the Times produced a pre-recall poll that was so off, so obviously inaccurate (it showed Schwarzenegger losing by a huge margin to Hispanic Democrat Cruz Bustamante), even rival polling organizations cried foul. As the Field Poll organization pointed out, the Times had creatively overrepresented blacks and Asians among the respondents. And as I found out, after several phone calls to Times polling czarina Susan Pinkus, she had even more creatively overrepresented “white Hispanics” in the “white” category (an easy enough task, as over half of U.S. Hispanics list their race as white). Hence the lopsided and totally unrealistic numbers for Bustamante. Yet again, not so much a lie as the wily use of racial categorizing to engender a pro-Democrat result.

Sometimes, though, even the finest cunning can’t avoid disaster. In July 2002, a 5-year-old white girl in Orange County was abducted while playing in her front yard (her corpse was found soon after; she had been raped and suffocated). The Times, like every other local news organ, covered the story vigorously. Sadly for a paper that tries to avoid coverage of minority-on-white crime, when the rapist-murderer was caught, he turned out to be Latino. Caught unprepared, Times editors had to think fast. No, they didn’t Photoshop him as an albino; that would have been stupid and clumsy. Rather, they ran a piece practically apologizing for giving coverage to the disappearance of a white girl, and they ran a second piece assuring their readers that white people are more statistically likely than Latinos to be kidnapping rapist-murderers. See, they turned it into a teachable moment! Genius.

But what happens when a case provides no opportunity for cover and no room for shenanigans? That brings us to Roberta Happe and, by extension, my own personal Henry V “no mercy, no prisoners” moment regarding the left.

Roberta Happe was a beautiful 23-year-old woman, a recent graduate from USC with a business degree who eschewed the corporate world to devote her life to working with disadvantaged, developmentally disabled children. One evening in February 2001, as Happe was leaving work, she was abducted in a parking garage by a man named Jason Thompson, who made her drive to an ATM, where she was forced to withdraw $400. Thompson then raped, tortured, beat, stabbed, and strangled Happe, leaving her naked body in a Culver City park. By the next day, the LAPD had identified Thompson as the assailant. He’d left behind fingerprints, DNA, and his image on the ATM security camera. An APB was put out for Thompson, who—due to the horrifically brutal nature of the crime—was considered a major risk to strike again.

Posted in Los Angeles, Los Angeles Times, Race, Rape | Comments Off

Black, Brown, and Beyond: Exploring Issues of Race and Color within our LA Community

Posted on October 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

Rav Yosef Kanefsky (the most left-wing Orthodox rabbi on the West Coast) emails his list:

Dear friends,

Race relations has been a particularly painful theme in our country’s narrative, and continues to be so right up to today. From Ferguson to Baltimore, to Charleston, the powerfully charged issues of race, justice, and enduring social tensions have played out again and again. As I have mentioned over the last few months, it is vitally important that as religious Jews, we join the national conversation about justice, race and identity, and develop relationships with the African-American and Latino communities right here in our city.

With thanks to a group of dedicated BDJ volunteers, we will be having a great opportunity to address this issue. Now all we need is you!

We will begin with a process of educating ourselves about the experiences of being a person of color in Los Angeles, via:

1) Reading Groups: I encourage you to read the selected articles listed below, and to form small groups for thought and discussion.

2) Community Discussion: Please join us on Sunday, November 22nd at 7:30 PM (Location TBD) in what will undoubtedly be an extraordinary gathering as we host Vincent Jones, CEO and Chief Strategist of Reinvent Communications, and Tunua Thrash Ntuk, Executive Director of Local Initiative Support Corporation. Please save the date!

Also, if all goes as planned, on Shabbat morning of Martin Luther King Weekend, January 16th, 2016, we will be hosting one of LA’s most prominent African-American political leaders. Confirmation to follow!

I am so looking forward to our undertaking this important challenge as a community.

Warmly,
Rav Yosef

Selected Readings
1) Letter to My Son Tanehisi Coates

2) A 58-Year-Old Black Man Reflects on the Death Around Him Conor Friedersdorf

3) Viva Gentrification! Hector Tobar

4) In Years Since the Riots, a Changed Complexion in South Central Jennifer Medina

5) Does Asking White People for Moral Self-Reflection About Race Actually Work? Jesse Singal

6) Class of 2025 expected to be most diverse ever Pew Research

7) Exploring Racial Bias Among Biracial and Single-Race Adults: The IAT Pew Social Trends

8) Mapping Segregation New York Times

Posted in Blacks, Bnai David-Judea, R. Yosef Kanefsky | Comments Off

The Dissident Right Needs Better Speakers

Posted on October 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

I’ve heard Heather speak many times and she’s always struck me as articulate and impressive.

A friend says: “What Heartiste meant is that she is not enough of a demagogue when she speaks. In fact, for the right audience, she is a terrific speaker and advocate. Heartiste would rather that she be more polished and a better polemicist such as Ann Coulter. Unfortunately, a speaker or writer’s voice in some way has to reflect the speaker’s personality. I don’t know what Ann Coulter is like but her writing style, speaking style have been so developed that if her personality differed initially, its all merged now. MacDonald never wrote to shock, but to set forth in a cold clear bloodless brief style her strongest case. She speaks the same way which is not conducive to speaking in sound bites. Heartiste wants her to be something other than what she is. At her age (born in 1956) she isn’t going to change.”

Heather MacDonald now sports a wedding ring in her photograph at the City Journal.

From the Chateau: Heather Mac Donald was recently a guest on NPR to discuss (as the one token representative of the right to balance the four leftists) the myth of the black lives matter narrative. Her hatefacts were unassailable, and to her credit she did not shy from dropping the most explosive truth bombs on the NPRatchiks (you could practically hear them sucking in breath between their teeth). But, her speaking and debating style was halting, labored, and lacking inflection, leaving the listener with the obviously misleading perception that she lacked the smarts or gravitas to know what she was talking about.

This is something I’ve noticed with more than a few public Realtalkers; they express themselves much more cleanly and forcefully in writing than at roundtables full of sneering leftoids. If the Dissident Party is to get off the ground, it needs better impromptu public speakers — Trump is a great example — who can parry leftoids on their turf. Machiavellianism comes more naturally to leftoids, so taking them on will demand a certain facility with the crimson arts.

I think what holds back Dissident mastery of the public sphere is self-doubt. There still lingers a hesitation to embrace the ugly truth with both arms, hugging it till it becomes one with the soul. When the last shadow of doubt is expelled, the fire within can glow again, and only then will NPR echo chambers quake and crumble under the persuasive might of righteous alt-right rebellion.

Executive summary: Game matters, most of all when the truth needs selling to a catatonic public.

COMMENTS:

* I hear what you are saying and that’s why Nigel Farage is such a rock star. The guy can deliver in public.

* A combination of self-doubt and the understanding that expressing hate facts as if one should actually change public policy can get you Richwine’d or Watson’d or Summers’d or Derb’d. Much safer for one’s own hide to express hate facts as curious academic findings warranting further study. Only a truly NFG spokesman, like Trump, will deliver the message in a populist, convincing way. If one has anything of value to lose, the enemy is too strong at the moment. Hence the reason Le Heartiste is anonymous.

* Jean Marie Lepen has been at the front of right wing politics for more than 50 years in France (saddly getting a bit old and senile now).

The next generation looks pretty hot: Marion Maréchal Lepen . She is a bit softer/more pc than her grand-father.

* The Right has trouble in debates because they’re required to think before they speak, which eliminates the cool, suave wittiness of friendly conversation. The Left doesn’t need to think; they merely recite the same things “everybody” else is saying, with enough individualized spin, charisma, attitude, or what-have-you to make their words sound better. They aren’t challenging each other, nor are they learning anything of value by listening to each other. They don’t think.

That’s what makes a debate between the Right and the Left so difficult. The Right has to think their way through the conversation (like Men), while the Left thoughtlessly vomits up whatever nonsense they’ve heard that made them feel good about themselves (like women).

Game is brilliant in these matters. Don’t bother debating. Hold frame. Tease them. Call them out on their nonsense and make them feel bad, then give them a conversational pathway to feel good. They’ll take it. They have to. They don’t have the mental ability to think for themselves, and they have no idea what you’re doing or how game works or why they like you so much even though they hate you.

Don’t worry about the issues. That argument was previously lost, and it can’t be gained back in a culture that openly despises logic. So work their feelings. It’s their weak point, as they’ve purposely built up their own personal feelings as more important that truth, reality, or general Goodness. You can’t win with the issues. You can only win by teasing them until they feel too silly to speak.

* ben shapiro i think handles situations pretty well (like that monster tranny death grip) but it seems like probably because he’s autistically unaware of other people’s emotions more than anything else.

ideally mark steyn would go full red pill and tear them a new one laughing all the way. he doesn’t back down

* Ben Shapiro is a great at verbal war but he pulls the same magic act on nice conservative folk that has been done to them for 60 years: Align on a few issues, but eskimoisrael is the absolute #1 no compromise.

I wanted to like him, I really wanted to like him after his gun debate with sniveling Piers Morgan, but he is very staunchly pro-eskimo in a way that is really irritating. If you want to find his few golden quips, you have to sift through mountains of him calling people anti-semitic.

* Yes, and with such folks, you will ALWAYS be betrayed. Those unaware of this are surprised when suddenly the Zionists and their loyals suddenly turn against the best and brightest on the Right, denouncing them as “extremists”. The average member doesn’t understand and says “Why can’t we all just get along?”

“Because he said this and this!” shout the Zios. “So he’s an extremist! He makes us all look bad!”

The ordinary member will go along with them for the sake of peace. Only a few people will be expelled, but then there will be peace. And those people get so angry during this process (surprise, surprise), so maybe the Zios were right, they really do cause trouble.

And then one of those expelled says something REALLY forbidden about the Zios, because he just doesn’t care to keep silent anymore. Now, we can’t have that. The ordinary member is relieved that he now has a good reason for supporting the expulsion.

And so it begins. This happens over and over again in nationalist parties, which are infiltrated by the usual suspects – but only when the hard, initial work has been done for many years, so that the party could get off the ground.

It will happen in the alt-Right too. People are holding up the Breitbart website as alt-Right now. That website is a very late member, set up by the Jew Breitbart only after people sacrificed careers and relationships to spread the truth for many years. Now you have a Jew like the homosexual Milo Yiannopolous there, saying some easy anti-mainstream lines – then denouncing “White supremacists”.

The same guy also declares that he would never sleep with a White man, only Black men. They love saying disgusting things as a by-the-way in a discussion about something else, knowing people will keep silent for the sake of unity. And he claims that homosexuals are “natural allies” to the alt-Right because they are “anti-mainstream”, the media being mainstream. False and absurd, but people keep silent in the comment section so as to not rock the boat. Giving loyalty to those who show no loyalty. You have to recognize the infiltrators’ modus operandi.

* The most important thing on the alt-right is that we stick with our own kind.

Don’t trust a yid or black on anything.

It’s like these cucks who want to get behind Ben Carson because he throws you a few bones.

Have you learned nothing?

* It’s what I am saying about writing fiction vs practical non-fiction. The former is like masturbating. You can make shit up as you go along. The latter requires real effort to get it right in a way that captivates readers. Leftists write fiction.

* It doesn’t help that most right-wing women, especially “reasonable” ones like Heather MacDonald, are natural appeasers and temporizers, as opposed to the deranged harpies of the left. It take a woman who is a fanatic, and two-thirds nuts herself, like Ann Coulter, to really go for the throat and stuff these people. As Eric Hoffer once said, “If you have a cause that needs fighting for, you had better get yourself some fanatics, because you won’t win without them.” Hence the enduring failure of the Cuck Right…

* “I think what holds back Dissident mastery of the public sphere is self-doubt. There still lingers a hesitation to embrace the ugly truth with both arms, hugging it till it becomes one with the soul. When the last shadow of doubt is expelled, the fire within can glow again.”

I heard this from a man in a nationalist party who was going to debate a local politician for the first time, in front of a high school audience I believe it was. It was the first time he would be in a debate and he was nervous, and he prepared thoroughly as the other guy was a Real Politician.

“But when it started I realized, he didn’t have anything! He only had the usual platitudes that they throw at each other. That you either need more welfare or lower taxes for immigrants. When I brought up all the statistics that we talk about he didn’t have anything to say. His hands even shivered and he looked down and got all red in the face.”

If there had been screaming leftist cohorts in the audience, that would surely have strengthened the mainstream politician, or if there had been a moderator who had propped him up as they usually do. But lacking moderator or audience support he had nothing. Anti-Whites can never win an unrigged debate with pro-Whites. And this was a revelation for my friend, who toughened up in future debates and interviews.

He also learned that you can never try to reason with reporters, or with those politicians who know the score and who willingly serve the media owners. (As opposed to the aforementioned politician who was simply a bureaucrat who believed his party.) If you meet those, you have to know it’s not a debate as such. They simply set out to deliver lies and half-truths meant to fool the people. You don’t “debate” them, you steamroll them before they steamroll you. You show clearly that you know they are the enemy.

Tekki. Have you seen the scene in Shogun where Blackthorne meets Lord Toranaga for the first time, and the interpreter is a monk from Portugal, a country at war with Britain? He doesn’t try to placate the monk – he doesn’t try that in the whole series. He points to the monk and says “tekki,” the Japanese word for enemy, so that Toranaga will know their interaction won’t be as advertised.

That is what Trump does with the media. He points to them and loudly says “tekki,” to tell people that the media won’t relay information about him in an honest manner. This is also a big difference between alt-Right and cuckservative Right.

* I think Dissident Rightists need to be a bit less pedantic in their style of speaking (as opposed to writing). These days it’s the soundbite and the emotive word-picture that will convert people – remember, you’re seeking to convert, not to reinforce the beliefs of those who already agree with you. Enoch Powell’s “Tiber foaming with much blood” speech was a great piece of oratory, but today at least, it would work better if the warning were expressed more demotically.

Posted in Game, Heather Mac Donald | Comments Off

The Feminization Of European Men

Posted on October 29, 2015 by Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* The feminization of the European male has contributed to the invasion in two ways. European women, like all women, desire masculine men. The low supply of masculine native men thus necessitates the importation of masculine ethnic aliens. And of course European men, being overwhelmingly feminized, do not resist this mass cuckoldry given that resistence would require a degree of manliness that is virually absent among native Europeans in the early 21st century.

* DNA testing is needed for all legal immigrants and illegal aliens. Also biometric ID data gathered from immigrants (legal and illegal) and all who enter America on visas. You don’t like it, then tough! Instead the PTB/NSA gathers as much information as possible on US citizens. The Feds are creating huge databases for medical records that get misused and leaked by authorized personnel of which (I will bet) there are some millions. Direct Federal employees and workers for Federal contractors.

Its not just Muslims scamming high trust societies with fake children and fake relatives. Goes on all the time and its a great way for legal immigrants to make thousands of dollars. They are being paid for smuggling people in legally (unless caught) this way! Its not done out of the kindness of their hearts.
Mexicans with those computerized one day border passes that allow them to enter here at any time. They legally cross in with other peoples children. Goes on all the time and they are get paid! Obviously!

* In Russia they used to let the klal pick the young men to be drafted. As long as the Jews met their quota the Tsar was cool. I expect they selected the indifferent yeshiva bochurs, layabouts and troublemakers. It was eugenic for the klal. But America was much more egalitarian: select by age.

What I can’t figure out was how the ultra-orthodox managed to dodge the draft during Korea and Vietnam. Surely they couldn’t dummy up their birth records in the USA.

* Draft Exemption category 4D- Ministers of religion or divinity students. I’m sure every draft age ultra-Orthodox male was a “divinity student”. They do this in Israel too.

* A large part of the insanity and arrogance underlying Merkel’s Boner and other similar schemes throughout the Western world–and one that’s seldom mentioned even by the alt-right–is the implicit assumption that everybody in the world would love to move to Germany (or America, or wherever) if they got the chance. This just isn’t realistic. If human beings were naturally prone to migrate their way out of difficult circumstances, then every poor country, war zone, and harsh clime on the planet would have been denuded of people long ago. This transparently isn’t the case, but the opposite notion is so firmly lodged in the modern mind that it colors all thinking on the subject.

What’s really going on here is that the operating system of the Western world is starting to crash. The lies we have told ourselves for several generations are bearing their fruit, combining in unstable ways and bringing the machinery to a halt. In the mind of the typical elitist, mass immigration is just QE for the meat-space; it is the printing of fiat wage slaves. When this can be done under the self-righteous veneer of SJW cosmopolitanism, so much the better. And if they can also use the self-same process to strategically depopulate Syria (so the thinking goes: If we can’t remove Assad with airstrikes, we’ll just evacuate his country!), then that’s icing on the cake. Yes, the upper classes really do think in this bizarre manner. They are the living exemplars of the managerial state run amok, viewing every human reality as some sort of logistical optimization problem.

Unsurprisingly, the real world refuses to be the endlessly malleable putty that they try to make of it, and the structure of reality avenges itself on the world-improvers through the timeless mechanism of unintended consequences. Unintended (by the world-improvers)–but neither unforeseeable nor unforeseen. Good leadership adapts itself to reality and is in the highest sense identical with reality. Incompetent leadership has a theory of what ought to be and ruins everything with its tyranny and shrill demands.

Merkel is one of those people sees the destiny of hundreds of thousands of human beings and the character of entire nations as hers to do with as she pleases. This staggering hubris will certainly be rebuffed by the gods.

* I think Merkel’s childlessness plays a part in her having opened the doors to all of MENA without any logical plan. The fact that she is on the other side of time now, without her own children, has transformed her thinking that she is doing this great “motherly” thing to all those big-eyed children we constantly see in the media. This last overture of a woman who never got a chance to be a mother, is touching in a nicey-nice way, but OMG, she has no plan!

However, now the chaos has started as winter is coming, and migrants arriving by busses to small towns and cities in Europe can not be left to just starve at the stations/town squares/succumb to pneumonia. Many are squabbling with locals and fights are breaking out.

Maternal instincts are not always the wisest when it does not involve actual children, your kin or your community’s (whatever that is) youth. There will be abundant crime & and violence for years to come since very few Muslims have integrated well or willingly, within their host countries in the last 20-25 years in northern Europe. I hate the idea, rather fact, that parallel communities of migrant cultures will continue to grow which are entirely dependent on the host culture yet rebuff the host country’s culture.

* Homosexuals are also targets of the Muslim rape army tramping its way to Germany and Scandinavia. In the Middle East, sodomy is halal if you are the pitcher. Afghan men rape prepubescent boys pretty much at will. In Sweden, the first rape crisis center for men was recently opened coinciding with the explosion of the male Muslim immigrant population. Coincidence? I think not.

* There’s no doubt about it, the flood will be a never-ending one unless Europe slams its borders shut and deports all illegals. The trouble with many people in white countries is that they project their own characteristics on to other races. They think Africa and the Middle East are places whose ultimate goal is European-style democracy. Until that happens, they believe, they may need a helping hand, someone to take in a few million of their surplus population spewed northwards by war or poverty. They can’t see that poverty, war, plunder and massacres are the norm in these places.

* British women find those men attractive for the same reason that Anna Stubblefield described herself as “in love” with a mentally defective black midget. They’re all brainwashed SJW moon-bats in love with their own self-righteous conceits. Let the Muslims have them.

Posted in Europe, Immigration | Comments Off