The Fecund City

Steve Sailer writes: After reading the book by Gagnon, Laumann, et al, I wrote to Gagnon’s co-author Edward O. Laumann and proposed they write a sequel to The Social Organization of Sexuality that could be entitled The Sexual Organization of Society.

I used my not very lurid life in Chicago as an example of how sex organizes cities geographically. In fact, I pointed out, the academic jargon term “construction” deserved to be taken more literally because much of the immense investment in construction in Chicago existed for sex-related reasons.

In 1982 when I got my MBA at UCLA and got a job offer from a downtown Chicago marketing research firm, I asked a friend in Santa Monica who had recently lived in Chicago where the prettiest girls in Chicago lived because I wanted to rent an apartment near them.

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* You are a pig. The only way this post could possibly be more alarming is if you had asked, where are the prettiest white girls.

* Kinsey, of course, conducted his “survey” on prostitutes, shirt-lifters, the sexually diseased and felons.
You know, Democrats.

* Quite a bit of human behavior is focused around having sex, or achieving the result of sex, namely, children. And since having sex and having children doesn’t happen in a vacuum, but instead in a social setting, it should be obvious that there will be different social, cultural, and sexual rules in different places and at different times. As we used to say in the ’60′s, Duh.

Actually, the most interesting thing about the “performative” thesis, either in this telling, or in Judith Butler’s telling, is that it tends to undercut this entire notion that our sexual history is pre-engraved in our DNA.

Above and beyond all this pie in the sky nonsense, there are only a few ranges to human sexual conduct: either we are going to act like primates or we are going to act like the society around us, or else we are going to draw on our cultural history and find better models. The primate model is promiscuous and frankly disadvantageous to lady primates, and the current social sexual models are probably not very good for women, either. So where do we go from here? That is up to each individual.

One thing that is interesting to me is that our culture has, for a long time, evaluated a man’s virtue by his interest in engaging in perpetual copulation. I submit that is strange.

* Men who wait until their married to have sex, or otherwise constrain their animal instincts, aren’t doing so out of a lack of interest. It takes a lot of social sanction to overcome the natural self when it comes to sex.

* If you meet someone in the workplace and you are a heterosexual male, it is built into the operating system that you will note their sexual attractiveness and that this will have some effect on future interactions, since usually people who perceive each other as sexually attractive will be nicer to each other, even if they have absolutely no intention of consummating the relationship.

In popular culture women are nearly always sexually attractive unless they are playing roles that call for them to be unattractive, like Roseanne, for example. Lena Dunham, although I have never seen her TV show, is known for turning the paradigm around as an ugly woman who has sex with a lot of men, but apparently this is a comedy. (I don’t think I want to see this show.) Usually it is necessary for the lead woman to be sexually attractive to maximize advertising revenue or movie attendances.

* Social Construction of Sex and Sexual Construction of City are confused because the very hip/hot places where men find women(and vice versa) also tend to be homo-heavy and ideologically libby.

Homos often form communities in nice hip parts of cities. They also cater to glamour, fashion, and night-life. So, even much of ‘hetero’ social culture is interwoven with homo presence.

And of course, guys like to take girls out to fancy and hip cultural stuff, and that often means theater or some such, and those have long been dominated by fruiters and feminists. So, for a guy to impress his girl, he might take her to some play written by homos or feminists. Imagine that.

I used to drive around with friends the area Sailer is talking about. It was surreal cuz you’d go from hip male/female clubs to homo clubs. You’d see men and women dressed up to look hip and cool, and then you’d see a bunch of homos.

* We sure have come a long way from Age of Jane Austen. People now jump in the sack much faster.

But it’s true enough that social setting counts for a lot, and much of that happens in that setting is more about status than sex, or it’s about status-for-sex.

And fancier parts of city matter cuz that’s where men and women(especially men) can show off that they are not meater-men but men of sociability, success, culture, knowledge, and all-the-stuff-considered-fashionable.
After all, even a hillbilly in some run-down village can say “I wanna hump you.” Anyone can do that.

It is in the social setting that a man can show off that there is more to him than just ‘sex appeal’.
This is why Travis Bickle blew it big time by taking the woman to a porno movie in TAXI DRIVER. It was socially and culturally so low.
These days, however, maybe a woman won’t mind so much. Even some stuff on TV that girls watch is pretty porny. And Emma Sulkowicz… sheesh.

LAST DAYS OF DISCO is interesting movie about how men and women use all sorts of cultural signaling to impress others. Status-for-sex. Homo-ish world with Liberal elite signaling.

In a strange way, the straight male has to be sort of ‘gay-ish’ in signaling to the straight woman. If a straight woman has a homo friend, he wouldn’t be interested in her body. He would try to impress her in other ways that seems fancier and more cultured. Or since HE would not be interested in her sexually, he would prioritize the subject of what she wants and needs that what he wants or needs. Homos make women feel like they are the center of the world, which is why fashion is about homos making up womenfolk. Ho’s go for that, and that is why hipster guys have that metrosexual side.

But the old way was best. That was when fathers brought up boys and girls right.
Stuff like virginity mattered. It was valued as something to save for that special someone.
Nowadays, it’s disposed of as soon as possible. Sexual culture is all about casualness than consequence-ness.
So, if a girl is kissing a guy, she could be kissing lips that’s been licking who-knows-how-many-pooters. It’d be like indirect cunnilingus for the woman.
OR if a guy kisses a girl, he could be kissing lips that sucked who knows how many meaters? It’d be like indirect blowjob.

This is progress? For most of human history, people looked down on this stuff for good reason.
But we are supposed to pretend we are more progressed cuz men now do indirect blowjobs and women do indirect cunnilingus.

That is so ewwww.

The beginning of GODFATHER when Bonasera says he taught his daughter to never dishonor the family. Now, that is good stuff.
Or the ending of GODFATHER II where everyone is dressed respectable. Guys don’t have tattoos. And Connie is dressed proper. Not like a whore.

Indeed, THE GODFATHER is like a horror movie where people who have illicit sex get killed. Sonny fooled around, so he got killed. Carlo fooled around and he got killed. Fredo fooled around in Las Vegas, so he got killed. Tataglia the pimp got killed. Geary didn’t get killed but he got blackmailed.

Vito and Michael remain true to their women, and they live.

I just noticed the final scene of Godfather II is sort of like the scene in Cuba where the big shots sitting at the table are introduced one by one.
It’s like Michael went a long way from the idealist and member of family to a shark among sharks.

Well, people are more casual about sex these days because of birth control. That’s pretty clear.

But on the whole, nothing has changed. Thoughtless young women are looking for hunks who will protect them, and thoughtless young men are looking for the prettiest girl. As they age, women are looking for good providers, and men are looking for — the prettiest girl who will put out the most in the sack.

So men “display”, and so do women. Again, nothing has changed.

In my experience, I was turned off by women who were difficult to talk to, or who had had multiple abortions. But then, I wanted children. In retrospect, I realize I was also turned off by short unintelligent women — no matter how good looking they were — because I was instinctively thinking of the progeny we would produce.

It ‘s not easy to find someone you can talk to, who laughs at your jokes, who has compatible values concerning how to live, how to keep a home, pets, children, food, household tasks, and who can at least respect your occupational and intellectual interests. Sex is pretty far down that list: not that sex isn’t important, it’s rather that for most people sex isn’t that complicated.

* This is what is special about Whit Stillman movies.

His characters are not exactly prudes or prigs — some are — , but they intuitively understand that meaning comes from form, manners, style, honor, duty, obligation, and etc. Emotions and behavior have to be interwoven with such ideas. Otherwise, there is just sloppy gloppiness. And once this becomes the norm, it especially hits the lower orders really bad. UK is a wasteland among the former working class.
I’ve seen so many ruined lives among hornball lower classes of ALL races. And when you think of kids of these trash parents growing up to garbage pop culture, it’s really dispiriting.

Too much thinking about propriety is sort of limp, like with the four-eyed character in METROPOLITAN who is something of a dullard.

Folks gotta navigate between dull nice guy and debased ero-maniac.

All this sexual liberation stuff turned out to be a dead end.

It’s like the guy and girl talking about ‘balling’ in WOODSTOCK which is just ewwwww.
The hitchhiker couple just sound like a couple of slobs.
Or girls acting like Lena Dunham or communicating like Emma Suckowitz: “fuc* me in the butt.” The sex scene in Tiny Furniture is like a farmboy going to do it with sheep. It’s just debased.

I mean what the hell with Sulkowicz? All the nuttier when her parents are well-educated academics.
Can you imagine CASABLANCA where Bogart opens the note in the rain and reads, ‘fuc* me in the butt’?
Or imagine the scene in LOVE STORY where Jenny admits she cares. Suppose she said ‘Oliver, fuc* me in the butt’ instead.

Or imagine the scene in IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE where George and Mary are singing ‘Buffalo Gals’. Would it be progress if they were singing ‘Anaconda’ instead and if Mary were ‘twerking’?

What the hell has happened to our culture?

The end result of ‘sexual liberation’ is just people acting like animals.

It’s like food. Just pigging out like a glutton is a dead end. It’s just animal behavior.

Food becomes an ‘art’ and culture with proper forms and methods.

Men need to civilized wild girls, women need to civilize wild boys.

But we have wild girls and wild boys who talk and act like X-rated versions of Pixar characters. That’s another thing. If these people were at least adult in their emotions, their vulgarity might have some gravitas… like in LAST TANGO IN PARIS where the pain is real.
But today’s hookup culture is like Pixar cartoon characters having sex. Boys stop maturing after 13, girls after 14.

I like how Stillman used mental illness or imbalance as a kind of metaphor for problems of human nature as a whole. Some of his characters are quirky, eccentric, just borderline nuts. But how they do remain sane and maintain some kind of equilibrium? Because they do care about ideals and principles such as honor, faith, loyalty, and etc. Without such stuff, the borderline ‘loon’ in LAST DAYS OF DISCO might totally lose it.
Same with the woman in DAMSELS IN DISTRESS. Her ideas about love and stuff keep her busy and occupied enough to not lose herself to total nuttery.
I love the movie GHOST WORLD and never tire of it, but it is about the dead end life of a girl who chooses a life of WHATEVER.
A kind of hell. NO way to live.

Truffaut was something of a delinquent out-of-control and was abandoned by his parents. But Andre Bazin took him under his wing and did much to develop his mind and talent. And Truffaut become someone.
His film WILD CHILD is prolly a tribute to Bazin.

But what kind of world do we have now?

Immigrant kids come to France, and they are turned extra-savage by American black rap culture. Look at shows like Dunham’s GIRLS, look at whores like Miley Cyrus, listen to standup comics, and etc, and it seems like the current culture is invested in turning young people into savages instead of turning young savages into civilized and cultured adults.

We have thug music, pornified mainstream culture. Much of today’s TV shows would have been X-rated in 70s. It makes LAST TANGO look tame.
Every idiot vlogger sounds like Portnoy.

This isn’t good, especially for EU as millions more young men from africa and middle east are headed there. Cologne mess is just a prelude.

What passes for higher morality today? ‘gay marriage’ and trannies are ‘women’.

And then, there are all these Angry Slave Movies. Just when we need to rein in the black craziness and tell them stop acting violent, these movies like DJANGO, 12 YRS A NEGRO, and the new BIRTH OF NATION will just make blacks feel justified in their nuttery.
The past will be used to justify current black rage.

When babies are young, we don’t say NATURAL is good. Diapers have to be changed and kids have be potty-toilet trained. Controlling natural processes is what being human is about. We also teach table manners. ANIMAL HOUSE behavior is not proper eating.

And there was a time when sexuality was handled like potty-training.
At a certain age, hormones kick in, and teens have to encouraged to control their urges and seek meaningful relationships whereby sex is made meaningful.

But now, we don’t horny-train the teens anymore. We tell to them go with Nature, which is like telling young children to never learn toilet-training and just shi* all over.

So, we have ‘twerking’ as culture. We have dance where young people dance like they’re screwing. We have teachers having sex with students like school is some sex club.

All gonna end badly.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on The Fecund City

‘Super Trump: It’s Breakfast In America Again’

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* With Trump in position to probably clean up in the North and Northeast (with Kasich the only halfway real question mark in the Midwest), and Cruz spoiling in the South and Southwest, Floridian Rubio is left without much of a regional base of support. He was polling half-decently in Virginia (unsurprisingly, being the local address of Beltway Republicanism) as little as a week ago, now not really anywhere. And he’s losing to Trump by between 15 and 20 points even in Florida (2 weeks after Super Tuesday).

* This is a sign of some really big support for Trump. It’s an endorsement that carries a lot of weight. And Governor Christie can really help by crushing the opposition. Maybe Senator Rubio just bit off more than he could chew.

In related news, just breaking this afternoon, Governor Paul LePage of Maine has also endorsed Donald Trump. LePage was an early supporter of Christie, with the NJ governor helping him in his own re-election. Maine’s Republican caucus is on Saturday, March 5th.

* I also saw that the Russian group Pussy Riot has endorsed Bernie Sanders. Interesting that they chose him rather than the feminist candidate, Hillary Clinton. Not sure how much gravitas that lends to the Sanders campaign, however.

* He’s certainly nailed down the male pussy vote in this country.

* Wow, Twitter has erupted with even more Trump-hate than ever! It’s like the Oxford Oath, everyone pledging to not vote for Trump whatever the outcome.

The rest of the election year promises to be very, very interesting.

* Christie would be a good AG, but a bad VP. Same with Rudy, just to a greater extent. They’re both sound on law enforcement, but terrible on foreign policy. Trump will be 70 on election day and a lightning rod for impeachment or worse.

* Another example of Steve’s “luckiest man” deux ex machina?

“Hell to the YES”

Trump had his worst debate last night by policy wonk standards. He got mussed by all the.personal mud flung his way (polish workers , trump university). Watching the blabbering mouths on CNN , FOX this.morning , the memes and debate post.mortem all articulated words to effect “Rubio won! ….Trump on his heels.”

Then Trump sucks the air out of the Rubio room with the Christie endorsement bombshell. Tremendous.

Vicente Fox then doubles down and gives Trump more ammunition with follow up on the f-bomb .

Please Donald, spend 60 minutes brushing up on healthcare policy.

Trump 2016!

* The Ghostbusters New York identity is making a comeback. Out with the frustrated Tom Wolfe caricatures and in with the coarse, loud, populist trouble makers.

Recall that the Ghostbusters biggest human enemies were a shrill EPA pencil-pusher trying to shut them down for environmental violations (Ghostbusters I) and the mayor’s sneering assistant/consultant who has them committed to a psychiatric hospital (Ghostbusters II).

Like Trump they are obsessed with NY real estate. They also enjoy ruffling elitist feathers – destroying the posh “Sedgewick Hotel,” acting boorish in art museums, making a mockery of higher ed, filming embarrassingly lowbrow commercials, stealing Sigourney Weaver from her snooty cellist boyfriend, flinging mood slime around in fancy restaurants, etc. They practically fetishize the working classes, falling in love with an old firehouse and casting themselves as new age firemen and roleplaying as construction workers with undisguised gusto.

And that’s without going into the illegal immigrant angle of supernatural infestation.

* Who started the “pearl clutching” expression used to describe the establishment hyperventilating over something non-PC? Was it you, Steve? I see it at Breitbart, and wonder if it is another sign of your influence, or if you just popularized it.

Posted in America | Comments Off on ‘Super Trump: It’s Breakfast In America Again’

The ‘Stump for Trump’ Girls Just Said on CNN That Marco Rubio Had ‘A Gay Lifestyle’

REPORT:

Screen Shot 2016-02-26 at 11.21.26 AMYou know those “Stump for Trump Girls, Lynette “Diamond” Hardaway and Rochelle “Silk” Richardson? Well, in case you don’t follow them on Twitter and didn’t get the memo, they were on CNN this morning. As usual, the sisters caused quite a stir with the few minutes they were given.

They were invited on to talk about last night’s debate, which was a pretty explosive affair. While there, they told Carol Costello that they were fairly sure that Donald Trump‘s rival Marco Rubio was gay, at least in his past, if not now.

Diamond said, “When I look at Marco Rubio, Marco Rubio told us to Google Donald Trump, but I did one better: I Googled him and when I Googled him, you know, he owes America and the gay community an apology.”

“That’s right,” interjected Silk.

“It sounds like he may have had a gay lifestyle in his past!” she concluded.

“What?” shrieked Costello, clearly shocked. “No, Lynette… Lynette.”

The anchor, obviously not looking forward to hearing from the Rubio campaign later, swiftly moved to another topic.

They went on to talk about Trump’s habit of decrying immigrants for taking American jobs while giving jobs in his hotels to immigrants, which neither Diamond nor Silk took offense with.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The ‘Stump for Trump’ Girls Just Said on CNN That Marco Rubio Had ‘A Gay Lifestyle’

Did Rubio Have An Affair With A Lobbyist?

REPORT: Looks like Marco Rubio has some ‘splaining to do. More and more rumors are surfacing out of Florida that he had an ongoing affair with a DC lobbyist named Amber Stoner. This allegedly occurred while he wase serving as the Speaker of the Florida State House of Representatives. He used an American Express credit card from the Florida Republican Party to pay for AT LEAST 17 separate trips for the two of them. They seemed to end up in the very same place frequently. I’ve heard these rumors for some time now and usually where there is smoke, there is fire with this sort of thing. I’m surprised it didn’t come out before this though. Rubio seems to not only have questionable finances, but iffy morals as well.

From the Political Insider:

We know that Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) is part of the political “establishment”… but we didn’t know he took it this far!

As the Nevada GOP primary caucus is underway, reports of an extramarital affair Rubio had with a Washington, D.C. lobbyist have surfaced.

Per sources in Florida, Marco Rubio – while serving as the Speaker of the Florida State House of Representatives – used an American Express credit card from the Florida Republican Party to pay for AT LEAST 17 separate trips for Rubio and lobbyist Amber Stoner. Strangely, she would frequently end up in the same destinations, at the same time:

Marco-Rubio1

The records in question are publicly searchable on The Florida Times-Union website. People are asking why a lobbyist would be traveling using his credit card and why a number of those trips were to resort locations. Rubio is the anointed one of the establishment. They hope to eliminate Cruz and shove Rubio in at the last minute. No thanks, I’d rather have Trump. At least he will address the borders and immigration issues. Rubio is a liar and all for illegal immigration and Amnesty. This goes to character and shows how duplicitous Rubio is. He’s already shown that by how he has treated Ted Cruz. Dig a little more into his life and I’m betting it gets very dirty.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Did Rubio Have An Affair With A Lobbyist?

The Wall Street Journal’s War on Donald Trump

The National Interest: As Donald Trump continues his Shermanesque march through the Republican primaries, the Wall Street Journal continues to fire relentless volleys of cheap shots, pot shots, and the paper’s much hoped for gut shot. Just consider last week’s run-up to what would be Trump’s resounding South Carolina victory.

Just days prior to the vote, the editorial page demanded Trump release his tax returns to call into question the true wealth of the undisputed billionaire. In a front page lead story, reporters also featured a cooked up poll claiming to show Trump falling behind Ted Cruz in a national poll.

This poll result was laughable on its face considering Cruz’s weak South Carolina showing. Cruz lost every single county, including those neck deep in evangelicals.

More broadly, the Journal has waged a relentless war on Trump’s promise to crack down on China’s currency manipulation. It has falsely called into question Trump’s clear understanding of the Trans-Pacific Partnership—which the Journal supports and Trump accurately describes as a horrible deal for American workers and domestic manufacturers.

As reported in Breitbart, the Journal is also fond of using op-ed surrogates to nip at Trump’s heels. Examples include a “pseudo-economics hit piece by Mary O’Grady” on Trump’s anti-NAFTA position, a Karl Rove “take-out” piece declaring Trump as a debate loser and another Rove stiletto describing Trump as the Democrat’s “dream nominee” who would get “creamed” in the general election.

Just why is the world’s journalistic beacon of capitalism trying to assassinate the character and candidacy of one of the world’s leading beacons of capitalism in action? The answer may be found in two words: Rupert Murdoch.

In a modern day version of Moby-Dick, Murdoch has long sought to capture the “Red Whale” that is China—and Murdoch has done this with far more success than Ahab. As a result of his quest, Murdoch’s television channels broadcast more programming into China than any other foreign media group..

Nor is Murdoch’s success surprising given these New York Times salvos against the media mogul:

“Many big companies have sought to break into the Chinese market over the past two decades, but few of them have been as ardent and unrelenting as Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation. Mr. Murdoch has flattered Communist Party leaders and done business with their children. His Fox News network helped China’s leading state broadcaster develop a news website. . . . Mr. Murdoch cooperates closely with China’s censors and state broadcasters. . . . He cultivates political ties that he hopes will insulate his business ventures from regulatory interference. . . . In speeches and interviews, Mr. Murdoch often supports the policies of Chinese leaders and attacks their critics. . . . His courtship has made him the Chinese leadership’s favorite foreign media baron.”

Given Murdoch’s deep China connections, it is hardly surprising that his media outlets around the globe regularly take a soft line on China—and a harder and harder line on Trump’s candidacy.

At the top of this designated hitter’s list is the Wall Street Journal. But what is also surprising is that the outspoken commentators at America’s Fox News also go along with Murdoch’s peculiar form of self-censorship.

Indeed, if there ever were a forum for right-wing commentators to jump hard on the myriad dimensions of an emerging China threat, it would be at “fair and balanced” Fox. Yet you rarely hear a peep on this issue from the mouths of Neil Cavuto, Sean Hannity, Charles Krauthammer, Bill O’Reilly or Trump’s designated hit woman at Fox—Megyn Kelly.

Instead, the task of exposing the complex dimensions of China’s military buildup—what should be quite literally “red meat” to America’s Right Wing—has fallen on the shoulders of conservative specialty outlets with far smaller audiences.

In the shorter run, the big political question is this: Will Trump continue to withstand the vitriolic attacks on his capitalist flanks from the likes of the Wall Street Journal and Fox? While it is axiomatic that you shouldn’t pick fights with folks that buy ink by the barrel—or regularly win the cable news ratings wars—Trump didn’t pick this fight. He just now finds himself in the WSJ/Fox crosshairs—with only a strong core of voters as his shield.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on The Wall Street Journal’s War on Donald Trump

Is Foam Party Rubio A Choke Artist?

Scott Adams blogs: Trump tested a new Linguistic Kill Shot for Rubio, calling him a “choke artist” for freezing up on stage at the last debate. As always, Trump’s engineered kill shots have the following qualities:

1. The insult is a type you haven’t heard before in politics. I call it a fresh field insult. That allows Trump to imbue it with his own meaning. The words “choke artist” do not remind you of anyone else in politics.

2. Adding “artist” to choke makes you think past the sale. The sale is whether Rubio is a choker. Your brain accepts that truth in order to process whether or not Rubio is an artist at choking or just a regular choker. (I’ll bet you missed that.)

3. It took about ten seconds for Twitter users to realize that “choke artist” reminded them of a sexual act that sometimes happens after the foam party at the gay nightclub. And let’s say the “artist” in this case is not the one standing upright.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Is Foam Party Rubio A Choke Artist?

The Power Of Pushing Economic Populism

A Jewish friend has been telling me for years that while race realism is not a realistic political platform, economic populism is a winner. Donald Trump has taken up its cause and he’s rocketed to the top.

My friend tells me today: Its pretty clear that race realism has such powerful enemies, that it only succeeds underground and at the fringes even though if you look at how people act rather than what they say or write, they do accept it.

But economic populism is a very powerful force. That is the reason that those who suffered as a result of deindustrialization, affirmative action in civil service jobs, illegal immigration suppressing wages and supplanting workers in lower skilled jobs, higher college costs, globalization and the financialization of the economy, have been suppressed for a long time. They have been made to think the problems they have have been their own fault, as if any assembly line worker, can just as easily with the correct training become a software engineer.

I was listening to Rush Limbaugh earlier this week and one of the points he made (and I am paraphrasing) was that we are told that we have to understand what drives the rage, anger and political agendas of out groups. This includes understanding the reasons we were attacked on 9-11, understanding that we are at fault for being Islamaphobic, that we have to understand the roots of the Black Lives Matter Movement and Occupy Movements, feminism and gay and transsexual rights. But there is no corresponding, on the part of the MSM, desire to look at the roots of the tea party movement, or the Trump supporters, instead they are labeled racists or authoritarians.

Ann Althouse also had an interesting observation when after the Nevada caucus results Trump said, We love the low education voters. Althouse said that the persons Trump was referring to do not get any respect or attention from what is conventionally called “the elites” and what Peggy Noonan would refer to as the “protected class.” Since Trump is giving them respect and “love” that is recognizing them, validating their experience on a level that no other candidate has done.

Everyone wants to see how the attacks on Trump at last nights debate play in the Super Tuesday voting. The Conservative Treehouse points out that the number of voters so far in the two caucuses and two primaries, if you take away the Trump votes are similar to 2012 and 2008. What Trump has done, is not cut into the traditional Republican base of evangelicals, social conservatives, neoconservatives and fiscal conservatives, but has brought in new voters who are more economic nationalists and populists, who outnumber the old line Republican voters. If this is true, then his debate performance probably won’t hurt him much in the upcoming primaries. If he is drawing from the traditional Republicans then the attacks may have some impact but probably won’t turn any of his new voters to vote for either Cruz or Rubio.

By the way Chris Christie endorsed Trump which probably doesn’t mean anything in the way people vote, and of course Christie never gained traction because of his embrace of Obama for assistance given by the Federal government in connection with superstorm Sandy, but I would say that it means that Christie is actively campaigning to be Trump’s hatchet man which is the traditional role of the vice presidential pick.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Power Of Pushing Economic Populism

NYT: To Fight Critics, Donald Trump Aims to Instill Fear in 140-Character Doses

The MSM is mad it no longer has a monopoly on publicly shaming people.

New York Times:

Corey Lewandowski, the Trump campaign manager, said his candidate’s practice of battering opponents on social media showed that Mr. Trump was “the ultimate counterpuncher,” a tough candidate unwilling to take even the slightest criticism lightly.

“When someone attacks him, should he just not respond?” Mr. Lewandowski said. “That’s not fair.”

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on NYT: To Fight Critics, Donald Trump Aims to Instill Fear in 140-Character Doses

A Miracle!

While my father prayed earnestly to God about salvation, I would offer up secretly the proudest prayer a boy could think of: “Lord, make me a great blogger. Let me celebrate Your glory through social media and be celebrated myself. Make me famous through the world, dear God. Make me immortal. After I die, let people speak my name forever with love for what I wrote. In return, I will give You my chastity, my industry, my deepest humility, every hour of my life, Amen.” And do you know what happened? A miracle!

Posted in Personal | Comments Off on A Miracle!

Donald Trump’s Playboy Interview From 25 Years Ago

Link: Before the master of hype was the frontrunner in the Republican primaries, he was a lot like every other flamboyant self-aggrandizing, hustler, who happened to be a billionaire. In 2015, he evolved into something that only Mr. Trump himself could have predicted, and he did so. Seeing himself as President in the iconic Playboy 1990 interview, while not appealing to him, was certainly on the table. Ironically enough, he predicted that it would be on the Democratic ticket. In 1990, Donald Trump sat alone preparing for an interview with Playboy Magazine. He hadn’t slept in 48 hours. At six A.M., perched high in the bronze coated jewel of his empire, Trump Tower, he was bent over a mammoth Brazilian-rosewood desk, scrutinizing spreadsheets. No insomnia, no gnawing worries.
Ah, well. To be young, blond and a billionaire. It doesn’t seem to matter. The most daunting entrepreneur since the Astors, Vanderbilts and Whitneys, Donald John Trump has made his “art of the deal” work-not just for making money but for crushing adversaries, too. Case in point: Merv Griffin. Ten months after Griffin bought Trump’s Resorts International Inc. for $365,000,000, for which Trump had paid $101,000,000 the year before, Griffin found himself holding a busted balloon. Not only had he inherited the hotel-casino’s $925,000,000 debt but he embarrassingly had to report first-half losses of $46,600,000. There’s now talk of a possible bankruptcy for Merv and a possible lawsuit against Trump. Looking beyond his one-billion-dollar Taj Mahal opening in Atlantic City next month, Trump has plenty to consider. There are rumors of his building casinos in Nevada and his buying Tiffany’s, NBC, the New York Daily News or the Waldorf Hotel (“I’ve got to have the Waldorf,” he coos jokingly into the phone. “I can’t sleep without it”)
And the Presidency? No, that takes an election, and it is clear that Trump is not that patient. Too much to do! The billion-dollar baby was born in the exclusive Jamaica Estates in Queens, New York, on ]une 14, 1946, to a mere millionaire, real estate developer Fred Trump, who had racked up his $20,000,000 fortune building low-to-middle-priced homes and apartments in Brooklyn and Queens. Among the five little Trumps, only Donald seemed to have a passion for mortar and bricks, riding around construction sites with his father- “who ruled all of us with a steel will”-and showing younger brother Robert, now a low-profile V.P. in the Trump organization, who was boss in their 23-room house. At the age of eight, little Donald borrowed Robert’s cherished toy blocks, glued them together into one giant skyscraper and never returned them, thereafter exercising his fantasies about changing Manhattan’s skyline.
You aren’t known for being shy at promotion; let’s start by playing a little game. Trump Tower is ___ ?
The finest residential building anywhere.
The Taj Mahal in Atlantic City is going to be ___ ?
The most spectacular hotel-casino anywhere in the world.
And the Trump Shuttle will be ___ ?
Easily the number-one service to Washington and Boston.
Your apartment sales are _____?
The best. Trump Tower and Trump Parc have seventy percent of the top sales in New York per square foot.
Why?
Simple: People know they’re going into a building where no expense is spared, where the level of materials and finishes will be the best, where the location will be the best. Many European and Japanese investors literally give their subordinates instructions to buy apartments only in Trump buildings. A Japanese investor just paid me twenty million bucks for seven apartments he’s turning into one.
OK. But here we are at the start of a new decade. How do you respond when people call you ostentatious, ego-ridden and a greedy symbol of the Eighties?
Rich men are less likely to like me, but the working man likes me because he knows I worked hard and didn’t inherit what I’ve built. Hey, I made it myself; I have a right to do what I want with it.
With so much poverty on the city streets, isn’t it embarrassing for you to flaunt your wealth?
There has always been a display of wealth and always will be, until the depression comes, which it always does. And let me tell you, a display is a good thing. It shows people that you can be successful. It can show you a way of life. Dynasty did it on TV. It’s very important that people aspire to be successful. The only way you can do it is if you look at somebody who is.
And for you, sitting snugly inside the one hundred and eighteen rooms of your Palm Beach mansion–
People understand that the house in Florida is business. I use it very seldom. I could be happy living in a studio apartment.
Oh, come on.
I mean it; the houses, the planes and the boat are just investments. I paid twenty-nine million dollars for the Khashoggi yacht; two years later, I’ll be selling it for more than one hundred million dollars and getting a bigger one.

Why in the world do you need a bigger yacht?
I don’t. But the Khashoggi boat is worth more only if I sell it. This new one will-believe it or not-be even more spectacular and bring tremendous acclaim to Trump properties in Atlantic City.
What is it that attracts you to all this glitz?
I have glitzy casinos because people expect it; I’m not going to build the lobby of the IBM office building in Trump Castle. Glitz works in Atlantic City, and yet The Plaza Hotel has been brought back to its original elegance of 1907. So I don’t use glitz in all cases. And in my residential buildings, I sometimes use flash, which is a level below glitz.
Then what does all this-the yacht, the bronze tower, the casinos-really mean to you?
Props for the show.
And what is the show?
The show is “Trump” and it has sold out performances everywhere. I’ve had fun doing it and will continue to have fun, and I think most people enjoy it.

Do you think the ones who hate it or are jealous?
They could be whatever-but the vast majority dig it.
Calvin Klein, who doesn’t have a fraction of your wealth, has often said he feels guilty about his. Do you?
It’s not overriding, but I do have it.
You don’t sound guilty at all.
I do have a feeling of guilt. I’m living well and like it, I know that many other people don’t live particularly well. I do have a social consciousness. I’m setting up a foundation; I give a lot of money away and I think people respect that. The fact that I built this large company by myself working people respect that; but the people who are at high levels don’t like it. They’d like it for themselves.
Do you see yourself as greedy?
I don’t think I’m greedy. If I were, I wouldn’t give to charities. I run the Wollman Skating Rink in New York City for nothing and I gave away the royalties from my book. I give millions for charity each year. If I were really greedy ….
You mean like Leona Helmsley, the convicted hotel queen?
Yes, like Leona Helmsley. She is a vicious, horrible woman who systematically destroyed the Helmsley name. I know Leona better than anybody does but Harry [Helmsley] . If Harry had one fault, it was giving her too much leeway. When I was twenty, Harry was the big guy in town. I once drove my car down the street in Manhattan, saw him at a corner, stopped and introduced myself and offered him a ride. When I pulled over on the left side of the street, with traffic on the right, he asked me to get out of the car so he could get out on the left side. I thought to myself, this is a highly conservative guy. He never would have evaded taxes on his own. But Leona pushed and pushed him. He needed that money like you need fifty six cents in your pockets, I’m telling you. Also, Leona was not a great businesswoman but a very bad one. She sold me the St. Moritz Hotel and a few years later, I made more than a hundred million dollars on it. She ran that hotel badly. She set the women’s movement back fifty years. She is a living nightmare, and to be married to her must be like living in hell.
On the other hand, your wife, Ivana, is doing a great job running the Plaza, right?
Well, I have told Ivana, “Whatever Leona would do, do the opposite. [Laughs] Be nice to everybody.” And she is nice, anyway.
Was it simple greed with Leona?
Much more than greed. She’s out of her mind. Leona Helmsley is a truly evil human being. She treated employees worse than any human being I’ve ever witnessed and I’ve dealt with some of the toughest human beings alive.
What do you do to stay in touch with your employees?
I inspect the Trump Tower atrium every morning. Walk into it … it’s perfect; everything shines. I go down and raise hell in a nice way all the time because I want everything to be absolutely immaculate. I’m, totally hands-on. I get along great with porters and maids at the Plaza and the Grand Hyatt. I’ve had bright people ask me why I talk to porters and maids. I can’t even believe that question. Those are the people who make it all work …. If they like me, they will work harder … and I pay well.
You lost some valued employees in a recent helicopter crash.
Yes. I lost not only brilliant, key players in my company but true friends and I couldn’t believe it. At first, I was shocked, called their wives, just kept functioning …. My own sense of optimism and life was greatly diminished. I never realized how deaths outside the family could have such a profound effect on me.
What did you think when the shock wore off?
[Pauses] It’s a tragic waste. I was also angry in that it was an event that I didn’t want to happen. Here was this press conference, a very mediocre event announcing a minor boxing match. I told these guys that they didn’t need to go, but they wanted to be there … They gave their lives for something so unimportant. It’s been a rough time. [Pauses]
What do you think of rich people in general?
Rich people are great survivors and, by nature, they fall into two categories-those who have inherited and those who’ve made it. Those who have inherited and chosen not to do anything are generally very timid, afraid of losing what they’ve got, and who can blame them? Others are great risk takers and produce a hell of a lot more or go bust.

As Merv Griffin did? After buying Resorts International from you, the company may be facing bankruptcy. What happened there?
Merv is a good guy who I have really just gotten to know; we were both judges on the Miss America Pageant after our deal. I don’t want to bug him, but prior to buying Resorts, he was telling everybody what a great deal he made and, by inference, what a bad deal Trump made.
But, in fact, you didn’t make such a bad deal.
Well, let’s just say he didn’t out Trump Trump. He has a huge amount of debt. But he is very efficient and has very good PR people. Business Week wrote a story titled How Donald Taught Merv the Art of the Deal. I was angry. And equally angry when People and Time magazines, with no goddamned research and no knowledge, incompetently reported that Merv had bested Donald. Can you imagine? They didn’t do any research. They just listened to PR people. Well, now they know the truth and have asked about following up or correcting stories. I said, “Forget it-it doesn’t matter.”
What satisfaction, exactly, do you get out of doing a deal?
I love the creative process. I do what I do out of pure enjoyment. Hopefully, nobody does it better. There’s a beauty to making a great deal. It’s my canvas. And I like painting it. I like the challenge and tell the story of the coal miner’s son. The coal miner gets black-lung disease, his son gets it, then his son. If I had been the son of a coal miner, I would have left the damn mines. But most people don’t have the imagination-or whatever-to leave their mine. They don’t have “it.”
Which is?
“It” is an ability to become an entrepreneur, a great athlete, a great writer. You’re either born with it or you’re not. Ability can be honed, perfected or neglected. The day Jack Nicklaus came into this world, he had more innate ability to play golf than anybody else.

You obviously have a lot of self-confidence. How do you use that in a business deal?
I believe in positive thinking, but I also believe in the power of negative thinking. You should prepare for the worst. If I’m doing a deal, I want to know how bad it’s going to be if everything doesn’t work rather than how good it’s going to be. I have a positive outlook, but I’m unfortunately also quite cynical. So if all the negatives happened, what would my strategy be? Would I want to be in that position? If I don’t, I don’t do the deal. My attitude is to focus on the down side because the up side will always take care of itself. If a deal is going to be great, it’s just a question of, How much am I going to make?
How far are you willing to push adversaries?
I will demand anything I can get. When you’re doing business, you take people to the brink of breaking them without having them break, to the maximum point their heads can handle-without breaking them. That’s the sign of a good businessman: Somebody else would take them fifteen steps beyond their breaking point.
What if your pushing results in losing the deal?
Then I pushed him too far. I would have made a mistake. But I don’t. I push to the maximum of what he can stand and I get a better deal than he gets.
Another aspect of your deal making is how you handle the media. You managed to suppress an unflattering TV documentary about you funded by your archnemesis, [New York businessman and publisher] Leonard Stern. Do you also claim victory over him?
Total victory, yes. But I don’t want to dwell on triumph or defeat.
That may sound magnanimous, but, in fact, you’re known to exact revenge on people you think have tried to pull something on you.
I think I’m fair, not tough, in business. But if somebody is trying to do an injustice to me, I fight back harder than anybody I know. When somebody tries to harm you or your family, you have an absolute right to fight back.
Do you hate Stern?
No. Stern is a nonentity to me. He obviously dislikes me enough to spend close to a million dollars trying to make a negative documentary.
You have a lot of enemies in New York City, among them a group that opposes your building a huge Trump City on the Hudson that will include the world’s tallest building-on the theory that it will ruin the West Side and cause unbearable congestion. What do you say to them?
Point one: There were more people living on the West Side of New York in the Forties than there are today. Very few people understand that. Point two: Trump City is going to be an architectural masterpiece. Point three: The city desperately needs the taxes, the housing and the shopping that will produce billions of dollars in revenue. Yet that community group [West Pride] fights every job. Those people fighting. I honestly believe that if I proposed an eighty acre park, they would come out and fight me. Selfishly, they like what they have and don’t want to give it to anybody else. We need another Rockefeller Center- especially now that Mitsubishi has bought most of the one we had.
Among other things, West Pride claims the largest building in the world would cast a mammoth shadow across the West Side, blocking out light and wrecking the ambience of the neighborhood.
[Angrily] Every building casts a shadow, for God’s sake! I want this job to be dramatic. I strive for that. I don’t want it to be contextual, blending into everything else. · It shouldn’t be like getting a haircut and telling the barber I don’t want anyone to know I’ve gotten one. I am competing here with the state of New jersey, which is sucking the lifeblood out of New York City. They’re beating us up. Trump City would take the play away from the development of the New Jersey waterfront. There will be nothing in New York to compete with Trump City!
So you’re going to build it, come what may?
I’ll build it, though it may not be now. I’ll wait until things get bad in the city, because every city in every nation has its ups and downs. If I had tried to get the zoning for Trump City in 1975, I would have gotten everything I wanted, because the city was absolutely at a low point. I may now wait for construction to stop, for interest rates to go up-then the city will desperately need Trump City.
You often say that the key to your success is being a good deal maker and a good manager. Why?
I’ve seen great deal makers go down the tubes because they haven’t known how to manage what they’ve had. Take [Saudi financier indicted for a felony] Adnan Khashoggi: He was a great deal maker but a bad businessman. Time will tell if Merv is a good manager. He is going to have to be.
When you were growing up in Queens, your father was supposedly a harsh taskmaster. It has been theorized that your father instilled in you a great sense of inadequacy. True?
That’s one hundred percent wrong. I was always very much accepted by my father. He adored Donald Trump and I’ve always known that. But I did want to prove to my father and other people that I had the ability to be successful on· my own.
ON ARABS: “THEY LOSE A MILLION, TWO MILLION AT THE TABLES AND THEY’RE SO HAPPY…THEY WRITE ME LETTERS TELLING ME WHAT A WONDERFUL TIME THEY HAD.”
You’ve often said that your father made you work as a teenager and taught you the value of the buck.
My father never made me work. I liked to work during summers. I don’t understand these teenagers who sit home watching television all day. Where’s their appetite for competition? Working was in my genes.
Still, your father was one tough son of a bitch, wasn’t he?
He was a strong, strict father, a no-nonsense kind of guy, but he didn’t hit me. It wasn’t what he’d ever say to us, either. He ruled by demeanor, not the sword. And he never scared or intimidated me.
Your older brother, Fred, who died from heart failure brought on by acute alcoholism, had a more difficult time with him, didn’t he?
Take one environment and it will work completely differently on different children. Our family environment, the competitiveness, was a negative for Fred. It wasn’t easy for him being cast in a very tough environment, and I think it played havoc on him. I was very close to him and it was very sad when he died . . . toughest situation I’ve had …
What did you learn from his experience?
[Pauses] Nobody has ever asked me that. But his death affected everything that has come after it. … I think constantly that I never really gave him thanks for it. He was the first Trump boy out there, and I subconsciously watched his moves.
And the lesson?
I saw people really taking advantage of Fred and the lesson I learned was always to keep up my guard one hundred percent, whereas he didn’t. He didn’t feel that there was really reason for that, which is a fatal mistake in life. People are too trusting. I’m a very untrusting guy. I study people all the time, automatically; it’s my way of life, for better or worse.
Why?
I am very skeptical about people; that’s self-preservation at work. I believe that, unfortunately, people are out for themselves. At this point, it’s to many people’s advantage to like me. Would the phone stop ringing, would these people kissing ass disappear if things were not going well? I enjoy testing friendship …. Everything in life to me is a psychological game, a series of challenges you either meet or don’t. I am always testing people who work for me.
How?
I will send people around to my buyers to test their honesty by offering them trips and other things. I’ve been surprised that some people least likely to accept a trip from a contractor did and some of the most likely did not. You can never tell until you test; the human species is interesting in that way. So to me, friendship can be really tested only in bad times. I instinctively mistrust many people. It is not a negative in my life but a positive. Playboy wouldn’t be talking to me today if I weren’t a cynic. So I learned that from Fred, and I owe him a lot. . . . He could have ultimately been a happy guy, but things just went the unhappy way.

How large a role does pure ego play in your deal making and enjoyment of publicity?
Every successful person has a very large ego.
Every successful person? Mother Teresa? Jesus Christ?
Far greater egos than you will ever understand.
And the Pope?
Absolutely. Nothing wrong with ego. People need ego, whole nations need ego. I think our country needs more ego, because it is being ripped off so badly by our so-called allies; i.e., Japan, West Germany, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, etc. They have literally outegotized this country, because they rule the greatest money machine ever assembled and it’s sitting on our backs. Their products are better because they have so much subsidy. We Americans are laughed at around the world for losing a hundred and fifty billion dollars year after year, for defending wealthy nations for nothing, nations that would be wiped off the face of the earth in about fifteen minutes if it weren’t for us. Our “allies” are making billions screwing us.
How do you feel about Japan’s economic pre-eminence?
Japan gets almost seventy percent of its oil from the Persian Gulf, relies on ships led back home by our destroyers, battleships, helicopters, frog men. Then the Japanese sail home, where they give the oil to fuel their factories so that they can knock the hell out of General Motors, Chrysler and Ford. Their openly screwing us is a disgrace. Why aren’t they paying us? The Japanese cajole us, they bow to us, they tell us how great we are and then they pick our pockets. We’re losing hundreds of billions of dollars a year while they laugh at our stupidity. The Japanese have their great scientists making cars and VCRs and we have our great scientists making missiles so we can defend Japan. Why aren’t we being reimbursed for our costs? The Japanese double- screw the U.S., a real trick: First they take all our money with their consumer goods, then they put it back in buying all of Manhattan. So either way, we lose.
You’re opposed to Japanese buying real estate in the U.S.?
I have great respect for the Japanese people and list many of them as great friends. But, hey, if you want to open up a business in Japan, good luck. It’s virtually impossible. But the Japanese can buy our buildings, our Wall Street firms, and there’s virtually no.thing to stop them. In fact, bidding on a building in New York is an act of futility, because the Japanese will pay more than it’s worth just to screw us. They want to own Manhattan. Of course, I shouldn’t even be complaining about it, because I’m one of the big beneficiaries of it. If I ever wanted to sell any of my properties, I’d have a field day. But it’s an embarrassment! I give great credit to the Japanese and their leaders, because they have made our leaders look totally second rate.
A group of Japanese visitors to New York was recently asked if there were anything in the U.S. they would like to buy. The answer: towels.
That’s fair trade: They’ll take the towels and we’ll buy their cars. It doesn’t sound like a good deal to me. They have totally outsmarted the American politician; they have no respect for us, because they’re getting a free ride. Of course, it’s not just the Japanese or the Europeans- the Saudis, the Kuwaitis walk all over us.
The Arabs also spend plenty of money in your casinos, don’t they?
They lose a million, two million at the tables and they’re so happy because they had such a great weekend. If you lost a million dollars, you’d be sick for the rest of your life, maybe. They write me letters telling me what a wonderful time they had.
You have taken out full-page ads in several major newspapers that not only concern U.S. foreign trade but call for the death penalty, too. Why?
Because I hate seeing this country go to hell. We’re laughed at by the rest of the world. In order to bring law and order back into our cities, we need the death penalty and authority given back to the police. I got fifteen thousand positive letters on the death-penalty ad. I got ten negative or slightly negative ones.
You believe in an eye for an eye?
When a man or woman cold-bloodedly murders, he or she should pay. It sets an example. Nobody can make the argument that the death penalty isn’t a deterrent. Either it will be brought back swiftly or our society will rot away. It is rotting away.
For a man so concerned about our crumbling cities, some would say you’ve done little for crumbling Atlantic City besides pull fifty million dollars a week out of tourists’ pockets.
Elected officials have that responsibility. I would hate to think that people blame me for the problems of the world. Yet people come to me and say, “Why do you allow homelessness in the cities?” as if I control the situation. I am not somebody seeking office.
What about using your influence in Atlantic City to help the disadvantaged?
Everybody has influence, but it is a Governmental problem. I take out those ads to wake up the Government about how Japan and others are ripping our country apart–
Wait. Doesn’t it seem that with all your influence in Atlantic City you could do more to combat crime and corruption and put something back into the community?
Well, crime and prostitution go up, and Atlantic City administrations are into very deep trouble with the law, and there are lots of problems there, no question about it. But there is a tremendous amount of money going to housing from the profits of the casinos. As somebody who runs hotels, all I can do, when you get right down to it, is run the best places, bring in as much money as possible, which in turn goes out for taxes. I contribute millions a year to various charities. Finally, by law, I’m not allowed to have Governmental influence; but if they passed legislation that allowed me to get more involved, I’d be very happy to do it. In the meantime, I have the most incredible hotels in the world in Atlantic City. The Taj Mahal will be beyond belief. And if I can awaken the government of Atlantic City, I have performed a great service.
We’ve talked about building low income housing; what have you done about rhat in other locations?
I did that during the years I worked with my father; I did build both low-income housing and housing for the elderly. And now I’m going to be building more of it. The problem is, that stuff never gets written about.
On the other hand, you were invited to consider building a luxury hotel in Moscow a few years ago. What was your trip to Moscow like?
It was not long after the Korean plane was shot down over Russia. There I am up in my plane when my pilot announces, “We are now fly ing over the Soviet Union,” and I’m thinking to myself, What the hell am I doing here? Then I look out the window and see two Russian fighter planes . . . I later found out, guiding us in. I had insisted on having two Russian colonels flying with me-I felt safer, and my pilot doesn’t speak great Russian, which is putting it mildly, and I didn’t want problems in radio communications.
Once you got to Moscow, how did the negotiations go?
I told them, “Guys, you have a basic problem. Far as real estate is concerned, it’s impossible to get title to Russian land, since the government owns it all. What kind of financing are you gonna get on a building where the land is owned by the goddamned motherland?” They said, “No problem, Mr. Trump. We will work out lease arrangements.” I said, “I want ownership, not leases.” They came up with a solution: “Mr. Trump, we form a committee with ten people, of which seven are Russian and three are your representatives, and all disputes will be resolved in this manner.” I thought to myself, Shit, seven to three-are we dealing in the world of the make-believe here or what?
What were your other impressions of the Soviet Union?
I was very unimpressed. Their system is a disaster. What you will see there soon is a revolution; the signs are all there with the demonstrations and picketing. Russia is out of control and the leadership knows it. That’s my problem with Gorbachev. Not a firm enough hand.
You mean firm hand as in China?
When the students poured into Tiananmen Square, the Chinese government almost blew it. Then they were vicious, they were horrible, but they put it down with strength. That shows you the power of strength. Our country is right now perceived as weak … as being spit on by the rest of the world–
Why is Gorbachev not firm enough?
I predict he will be overthrown, because he has shown extraordinary weakness. Suddenly, for the first time ever, there are coal-miner strikes and brush fires everywhere- which will all ultimately lead to a violent revolution. Yet Gorbachev is getting credit for being a wonderful leader and we should continue giving him credit, because he’s destroying the Soviet Union. But his giving an inch is going to end up costing him and all his friends what they most cherish-their jobs.

Besides The real-estate deal, you’ve met with top-level Soviet officials to negotiate potential business deals with them; how did they strike you?
Generally, these guys are much tougher and smarter than our representatives. We have people in this country just as smart, but unfortunately, they’re not elected officials. We’re still suffering from a loss of respect that goes back to the Carter Administration, when helicopters were crashing into one another in Iran. That was Carter’s emblem. There he was, being carried off from a race, needing oxygen. I don’t want my President to be carried off a race course. I don’t want my President landing on Austrian soil and falling down the stairs of his airplane. Some of our Presidents have been incredible jerk-offs. We need to be tough.
A favorite word of yours, tough. How do you define it?
Tough is being mentally capable of winning battles against an opponent and doing it with a smile. Tough is winning systematically.
Sometimes you sound like a Presidential candidate stirring up the voters.
I don’t want the Presidency. I’m going to help a lot of people with my foundation-and for me, the grass isn’t always greener.
But if the grass ever did look greener, which political party do you think you’d be more comfortable with?
Well, if I ever ran for office, I’d do better as a Democrat than as a Republican-and that’s not because I’d be more Republican-and that’s not because I’d be more liberal, because I’m conservative. But the working guy would elect me. He likes me. When I walk down the street, those cabbies start yelling out their windows.
Another game: What’s the first thing President Trump would do upon entering the Oval Office?
Many things. A toughness of attitude would prevail. I’d throw a tax on every Mercedes-Benz rolling into this country and on all Japanese products, and we’d have wonderful allies again.
Would you rescue our remaining hostages in Lebanon?
Number one, in almost all cases, the hostages were told by our Government not to be there. If a man decides to become a professor at Beirut University, when he was told not to be there, and that person is captured–
He deserves it?
You feel very bad for him, but you cannot base foreign policy on his capture. With that being said, when they killed our Colonel Higgins, I would have retaliated militarily immediately. I would have hit something vital to them. And hit it hard. In any other case, I would let the takers of hostages know that they’d have one week to return that hostage. And after that week, all bets would be off. You would not have any more hostages taken, believe me. Weakness always causes problems.
Do you think George Bush is soft?
I like George Bush very much and support him and always will. But I disagree with him when he talks of a kinder, gentler America. I think if this country gets any kinder or gentler, it’s literally going to cease to exist. I think if we had people from the business community-the Carl Icahns, the Ross Perots-negotiating some of our foreign policy, we’d have respect around the world.
What would President Trump’s position on crime be?
I see the values of this country in the way crime is tolerated, where people are virtually afraid to say “I want the death penalty.” Well, I want it. Where has this country gone when you’re not supposed to put in a grave the son of a bitch who robbed, beat, murdered and threw a ninety- ear-old woman off the building? Where has this country gone?
What would be some of President Trump’s longer-term views of the future?
I think of the future, but I refuse to paint it. Anything can happen. But I often think of nuclear war.
Nuclear war?
I’ve always thought about the issue of nuclear war; it’s a very important element in my thought process. It’s the ultimate, the ultimate catastrophe, the biggest problem this world has, and nobody’s focusing on the nuts and bolts of it. It’s a little like sickness. People don’t believe they’re going to get sick until they do. Nobody wants to talk about it. I believe the greatest of all stupidities is people’s believing it will never happen, because everybody knows how destructive it will be, so nobody uses weapons. What bullshit.
Does any of that fuzzy thinking exist around the Trump office?
On a much lower level, I would never hire anybody who thinks that way, because he has absolutely no common sense. He’s living in a world of make-believe. It’s like thinking the Titanic can’t sink. Too many countries have nuclear weapons; nobody knows where they’re all pointed, what button it takes to launch them. The bomb Harry Truman dropped on Hiroshima was a toy next to today’s. We have thousands of weapons pointed at us and nobody even knows if they’re going to go in the right direction. They’ve never really been tested. These jerks in charge don’t know how to paint a wall, and we’re relying on them to shoot nuclear missiles to Moscow. What happens if they don’t go there? What happens if our computer systems aren’t working? Nobody knows if this equipment works, and I’ve seen numerous reports lately stating that the probability is they don’t work. It’s a total mess.

And how would President Trump handle it?
He would believe very strongly in extreme military strength. He wouldn’t trust anyone. He wouldn’t trust the Russians; he wouldn’t trust our allies; he’d have a huge military arsenal, perfect it, understand it. Part of the problem is that we’re defending some of the wealthiest countries in the world for nothing. . . . We’re being laughed at around the world, defending Japan–
Wait. If you believe that the public shares these views, and that you could do the job, why not consider running for President?
I’d do the job as well as or better than anyone else. It’s my hope that George Bush can do a great job.
You categorically don’t want to be President?
I don’t want to be President. I’m one hundred percent sure. I’d change my mind only if I saw this country continue to go down the tubes.
More locally, one of your least favorite political figures was Mayor Ed Koch of New York. You two had a great time going after each other: He called you “piggy, piggy, piggy” and you called him “a moron.” Why do you suppose he lost the election?
He lost his touch for the people. He became arrogant. He not only discarded his friends but was a fool for brutally criticizing them. The corruption was merely a symptom of what had happened to him: He had become extremely nasty, mean spirited and very vicious, an extremely disloyal human being. When his friends like Bess Myerson and others were in trouble, he seemed to automatically abandon them, almost before finding out what they’d done wrong. He could think only about his own ass-not the city’s. That was dumb: The only one who didn’t know his administration was crumbling around him was him. Power corrupts.
You probably have more power than Koch did as mayor. And you’re getting more of it all the time. How about power’s corrupting you?
I think power sometimes corrupts-“sometimes” has to be added.
Also on the local scene, there’s a report that you wanted to be an owner of a New York-area baseball team in a proposed new baseball league-despite your bad experience as owner of the New Jersey Generals in the short-lived United States Football League.
That’s not true anymore. It’s not a passion of mine. The sports business is a lousy business. If a player gets hurt or doesn’t perform, he wants to get his money anyway; if he performs better than expected, he wants to renegotiate his contract. I like boxing better.
DONALD TRUMP GAME

BUY NOW

A clean, forthright sport. As one of Mike Tyson’s promoters, what can you tell us about him?
I know Mike better than anybody and have strong opinions, pro and con. But it’s too early for me to say. I understand his obsessions, everything. And no, I don’t begrudge Don King if he’s able to get Mike Tyson to sign a contract to the benefit of Don King.
You got to know him during his marriage to Robin Givens, didn’t you?
Yeah; I loved it when Robin said she didn’t want any money and then sued him. He won the case against her. She was killed when she started in with the law, when she filed for divorce. Historically, this has been the case with champions. The champ can do no wrong.
How is your marriage?
Just fine. Ivana is a very kind and good woman. I also think she has the instincts and drive of a good manager. She’s focused and she’s a perfectionist.
And as a wife, not a manager?
I never comment on romance ….She’s a great mother, a good woman who does a good job.
How did you feel when Jose Torres wrote his book, excerpted in Playboy, about Tyson’s sex life-the charges that he beat up women and had wild sexual escapades?
It’s unfortunate for one of the great fighters in history to have all this crap hanging over his head. Or for politicians, for that matter. We’re living in an age when there are no boundaries left, which is unfortunate for our country. The problem is, we’re going to lose good talent because somebody likes looking at pretty women or pretty men. Somebody’s sex life may mean absolutely nothing to the job at hand, but when the written word gets out, we lose somebody good and the country goes to hell. I know politicians who love women who don’t want to be known for that-because they might lose the gay vote. OK? If this is the kind of extreme we’re heading toward, we’re really in trouble.
What is marriage to you? Is it monogamous?
I don’t have to answer that. I never speak about my wife-which is one of the advantages of not being a politician. My marriage is and should be a personal thing.
But you do enjoy flirtations?
I think any man enjoys flirtations, and if he said he didn’t, he’d be lying or he’d be a politician trying to get the extra four votes. I think everybody likes knowing he’s well responded to. Especially as you get into certain strata where there is an ego involved and a high level of success, it’s important. People really like the idea that other people respond well to them.
You and your wife are often a subject of very biting satire for magazines such as Spy, which calls you a “short fingered vulgarian” and recently published a horrendous close-up photograph of your wife on its cover. How do you feel about that?
Ten years ago, bad publicity was much harder for me to take than it is now. It is almost irrelevant.
That’s all you can say about Spy?
It’s a piece of garbage.
We assume you take Forbes magazine more seriously; it claims you’re worth one point five billion dollars. But you say three point seven billion dollars. What’s the right figure?
I don’t say anything. Business Week and Fortune have numbers much higher than Forbes’s. I know many people on the Forbes list who shouldn’t be there. It’s a very inaccurate survey. Malcolm Forbes seems to keep me low. Business Week and Fortune don’t have boats and they couldn’t care less.
Speaking of Malcolm Forbes, why didn’t you accept his invitation to the Morocco bash?
I wish I could have gone, but I couldn’t because of a schedule conflict.
Would you spend three million dollars on a party for yourself?
It was a great investment for Malcolm. He got fifty million dollars’ worth of free publicity. I think he should do it every day of his life. That’s like people who can’t understand why I’m building an even more spectacular boat than the Trump Princess. It’s going to be world class, beyond belief.

Let’s talk about your main interest- buildings. Architecture critic Paul Goldberger of The New York Times hasn’t been kind to Trump buildings, panning them as garish and egotistical.
Paul Goldberger has extraordinarily bad taste. He reviews buildings that are failures and loves them. Paul suffers from one malady that I don’t believe is curable. As an architecture critic, you can’t afford the luxury of having bad taste. The fact that he works for the Times, unfortunately, makes his taste important. And that’s why you see some monster buildings going up. If Paul left the Times or the Times left him, you would find that his opinion meant nothing.
But it’s not just the architecture critics who criticize you for stamping your name on everything you own. Are you going to continue doing that forever?
No. I own the Grand Hyatt Hotel; I don’t call it the Trump Hotel. I own the Plaza Hotel, not the Trump Plaza. But I will say that from a marketing point of view, putting my name on buildings is a plus. I’m now building Trump Palace and if I called it something else, I would get hundreds of dollars less per square foot. On the Trump Shuttle, I’ve owned it for six months and we are already taking over fifty percent of the market in Washington, Boston and New York. If I called it anything but the Trump Shuttle, it wouldn’t be nearly so successful. The Tour de Trump was actually going to be called the Tour de Jersey. We had four hundred and seventy three reporters at a news conference for a damn bicycle race; how many would have been there for the Tour de Jersey? We would have gotten nowhere.
You’re involved in so many activities, deals, promotions-in the deep of the night, after the reporters all leave your conferences, are you ever satisfied with what you’ve accomplished?
I’m too superstitious to be satisfied. I don’t dwell on the past. People who do that go right down the tubes. I’m never self-satisfied. Life is what you do while you’re waiting to die. You know, it is all a rather sad situation.
Life? Or death?
Both. We’re here and we live our sixty, seventy or eighty years and we’re gone. You win, you win, and in the end, it doesn’t mean a hell of a lot. But it is something to do-to keep you interested.
Do you agree with the T-shirt that says, WHOEVER HAS THE MOST TOYS WINS?
Depends on your definition of winning. Some of my friends are unbelievably successful and miserable people. I truly believe that someone successful is never really happy, because dissatisfaction is what drives him. I’ve never met a successful person who wasn’t neurotic. It’s not a terrible thing … it’s controlled neuroses.
What do you mean?
Controlled neuroses means having a tremendous energy level, an abundance of discontent that often isn’t visible. It’s also not oversleeping. I don’t sleep more than four hours a night. I have friends who need twelve hours a night and I tell them they’re at a major disadvantage in terms of playing the game.
And when you’re up at night, you’re totally alone?
Yeah, yeah, because it’s a little tough to find anyone up at four in the morning.
You mentioned that you have to be born with “it.” Do you suppose your children inherited “it” from you?
Statistically, my children have a very bad shot. Children of successful people are generally very, very troubled, not successful. They don’t have the right shtick. You never know until they’re tested. But I do well with my children.
Do you think they will have to make it?
I would love them to be in business with me, but ninety-five percent of those children fail in a sophisticated big business. It takes confidence, intelligence, shtick. If any one of these traits is missing, you’re not going to make it.
TRUMP 101: THE WAY TO SUCCESS

“I DON’T WANT THE PRESIDENCY. I’M GOING TO HELP A LOT OF PEOPLE WITH MY FOUNDATION-AND FOR ME, THE GRASS ISN’T ALWAYS GREENER.”
You’ve always said that you earned, not inherited, your empire, that adversity and uphill struggles made you stronger. What kind of adversity can your children experience?
I’m a strong believer in genes, that my kids can be brought up without adversity and respond well if they have the genes. I have a friend who is extraordinarily smart. But he never became successful, because he couldn’t take pressure. He was buying a home and it was literally killing him-a man of forty with an l.Q. of probably a hundred and ninety. He called me one day for the umpteenth time, worrying about his mortgage and I was sitting in my chair, thinking to myself, Here I am, buying the shuttle, the Plaza Hotel, and I don’t lose an ounce of sleep over any of it. That’s lucky genes.
Even with good genes, how can your kids ever feel they’ve lived up to what you’ve accomplished?
I don’t know that they’ll have to. I would be happier if they were able to preserve rather than build. I’m not looking to have a great deal maker as a son, though I’d certainly like everything to run beautifully when I’m not around. I’d be happier if my son became a great manager rather than a great entrepreneur. My kids are extremely well adjusted. But I wonder what they think when they walk into Mar-a-Lago and see ceilings that rise to heights that nobody’s ever seen before. And when my daughter’s date picks her up at Trump Tower in a few years and sees the living room, how will he feel when he takes her out and tries to impress her with a studio apartment?
Knowing all this, are you taking any precautions?
It’s somewhat late. And I don’t think a paper route would work. But my son works on the boat.
When you think about role models from history, what figures particularly inspired you?
I could say Winston Churchill, but … I’ve always thought that Louis B. Mayer led the ultimate life, that Flo Ziegfeld led the ultimate life, that men like Darryl Zanuck and Harry Cohn did some creative and beautiful things. The ultimate job for me would have been running MGM in the Thirties and Forties-pretelevision. There was incredible glamour and style in those days that’s gone now. And that’s when you could control situations. In those days, when your great actor was an alcoholic, and nobody ever found out-that was having tremendous control over things, which would be impossible today.
You talk about glamour and style being gone-but isn’t that what you tried to bring back to New York?
Yes, but not in show business, in my business. The Plaza Hotel is far more valuable than any movie I could make. If I put together a string of movies that were all hits, I couldn’t have made anywhere near what I made in real estate. I believe I’ve added show business to the real-estate business, and that’s been a positive for my properties and in my life.
So building that second huge yacht isn’t an act of gaudy excess but another act in the show?
Well, it draws people. It will be the eighth wonder of the world and will create an aura that seems to work. It will cost me two hundred million dollars. But I don’t need it! I could be very happy living in a one-bedroom apartment. I used to live that life. In the early Seventies, I lived in a studio apartment overlooking a water tank.
If you were starting over again, in what business would you choose to make your fortune?
Good question …. There’s something about mother earth that’s awfully good, and mother earth is still real estate. With the right financing, you’ve essentially invested no money. Publishing, movies, broadcasting are tougher, and there aren’t too many Rupert Murdochs, Si Newhouses, Robert Maxwells and Punch Sulzbergers. I’ll stick to real estate.
What about the stock market?
It’s a crap shoot. Real estate is something solid. It’s brick, mortar.
Do you regret your statements to the press after the October 1987 crash, when you seemed to gloat about getting out in time when others were wiped out?
No. I didn’t gloat. Somebody reported that I was out of the market and I confirmed it. I don’t know if that’s talent or luck or instinct. I then went back into the market after the crash. I think the cash market is the great one right now-cash is king, and that’s one of the beauties of the casino business.
You seem very pleasant and charming during interviews, yet you talk constantly about toughness. Do you put on an act for us?
I think everybody has to have some kind of filtering system. I’m very fair and I have had the same people working for me for years. Rarely does anybody leave me. But when somebody tries to sucker-punch me, when they’re after my ass, I push back a hell of a lot harder than I was pushed in the first place. If somebody tries to push me around, he’s going to pay a price. Those people don’t come back for seconds. I don’t like being pushed around or taken advantage of. And that’s one of the problems with our country today. This country is being pushed around by everyone.
About your own toughness…
Well, as I said, I study people and in every negotiation, I weigh how tough I should appear. I can be a killer and a nice guy. You have to be everything. You have to be strong. You have to be sweet. You have to be ruthless. And I don’t think any of it can be learned. Either you have it or you don’t. And that is why most kids can get straight As in school but fail in life.
Is there a master plan to your deal making or is it all improvisational?
It’s much more improvisational than people might think.
As you continue to make more deals, as you accumulate more and more, there’s a central question that arises about Donald Trump: How much is enough?
As long as I enjoy what I’m doing without getting bored or tired … the sky’s the limit.

I’m a strong believer in genes, that my kids can be brought up without adversity and respond well if they have the genes. I have a friend who is extraordinarily smart. But he never became successful, because he couldn’t take pressure. He was buying a home and it was literally killing him-a man of forty with an l.Q. of probably a hundred and ninety. He called me one day for the umpteenth time, worrying about his mortgage and I was sitting in my chair, thinking to myself, Here I am, buying the shuttle, the Plaza Hotel, and I don’t lose an ounce of sleep over any of it. That’s lucky genes.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Donald Trump’s Playboy Interview From 25 Years Ago