The world is often an unsafe place for women, particularly when they are around groups that commit a disproportionate amount of crime (such as young black men, et al). The world is often an unsafe place for men as well only men rarely feel comfortable expressing that. Because women feel more comfortable sharing their feelings, they complain more than men. A man who complained about feeling unsafe would usually be looked at as a wimp.
Also, most TV journalists, particularly female journalists, owe their careers largely to their looks. When you’re attractive, you receive more attention. If you don’t like that, would you rather be ugly? Pack on 50 pounds and you’ll get a lot less attention.
Erin Andrews would not have the career she enjoys today if she was not gorgeous. If she were plain, she’d be lucky to be working in journalism at all. If, God forbid, she had some disfiguring accident that made looking at her a gruesome experience, she would no longer be on TV. Perhaps she could write books instead?
I know that journalists are sometimes assaulted for things they write or for just being journalists, just as people who are written about by journalists are often assaulted as a result. I have no doubt that the fevered intensity around Donald Trump will result in people getting hurt, and perhaps some of them will be journalists.
Every articulate person can tell a chilling story about how he has suffered. Even these horrible stalkers could tell you chilling stories about how they’ve been abused and teased and treated like dirt (often by beautiful women).
We hear more about how women suffer because they are more likely to share their feelings and we hear more about how journalists suffer because they have the megaphone. Journalists are not immune from bad luck, from criminal activity, and from the consequences of their choices.
If journalists don’t like the heat, they can get out of the fire. If they gain weight and dress dowdy, they will get less attention from men. If they become paralegals instead of TV journalists, they’ll be less likely to have stalkers.
Cry me a river about the suffering of TV journalists. Erin Andrews was awarded $55 million in this case.
How do working class white people protect their safety as America becomes increasingly anti-white? Unfortunately, most of these people are not terribly articulate and nobody seems to care about their safety, except perhaps Donald J. Trump.
With Los Angeles-area TV sports reporter Erin Andrews still engaged in her Nashville lawsuit against the Marriott hotel there over the 2007 nude video of her inside her room, Sports Illustrated spoke with several other women who cover sports for TV about life for them on the road. It’s depressing. All said they take some pretty careful steps to protect themselves from stalkers, creeps and invasions of their privacy at hotels. Keeping the name of their hotels off social media is one thing; some of these women ask for a new room if the desk clerk happens to say their room number out loud, or they cover peepholes with Band-aids and keep the blinds closed, and most don’t let in maids or other hotel staffers if they can help it. One of the women says she tries not to be unclothed when in the room, just to be safe…
Here in the Los Angeles area, harassment of TV reporters on location, especially women, seems to be on the rise. As well as at venues where Donald Trump is speaking and his supporters are gathered, but that’s a separate story. I could see the issue of reporter safety at those pointless 11 p.m. stand-up shots becoming a bigger issue for the stations.
Posted inJournalism|Comments Off on Kevin Roderick: How female TV journalists protect their safety after Erin Andrews
Of course, Maine is the only state that is, arguably, whiter than Bernie’s own electoral fortress of whititude, Vermont. Across the first 19 states to vote or caucus, the correlation between Bernie’s share of the 2 candidate vote versus Hillary and the percentage of the state’s population that was black in 2014 is a remarkable r = -0.87.
Here’s a question: Can Bernie and his supporters even claim a moral victory? If Bernie loses because he got his ass kicked by black voters doesn’t that automatically make him not the moral winner but the immoral loser? By definition, blacks represent morality. Hence, because blacks hate him, Bernie deserves to lose.
Comments:
* BernieLand is Portlandia writ large. Could Portland exist if it had the demographics of Birmingham? The liberals in Portland think so but I’m pretty sure that even the few remaining liberals in Birmingham probably see the folly of that vision.
* “Fundamentally, Bernie’s campaign does not seem to understand how the liberalism of black democrats differs from that of their white counterparts. Specifically, culture-war issues play a much smaller role, because that is one place where black and white Democrats do not align perfectly.”
“The reality is that “black liberalism” has historically existed hand-in-hand with religious belief, whereas “white liberalism” often exists in opposition to it.”
“Black Americans perceive – with justification – that their (our) economic standing is getting better, and therefore are more willing to stay-the-course. Bernie’s pitch misses the mark because he wants to overthrow a system that is finally starting to work, in order to help us reclaim something we never had.”
* I’d feel bad for Bernie but he is a coward who lacks basic assertiveness (see: Seattle BLM) and the courage of his convictions (see: his unbelievably cucked campaign stances on race and immigration). Part of me enjoys watching sociopath Hillary tear him to shreds.
* Perhaps my imagination is just being overactive, but if it were southern whites instead of southern blacks refusing to vote for a Jewish candidate for president, wouldn’t there have been a bunch of articles about anti-Semitism rearing its ugly head in Dixie?
* Ed Rollins regularly claimed he could buy the black vote. So what you are seeing is the astonishingly well funded Clinton campaign doing what Rollins claimed he could do, basically buy votes. As whites get poorer expect to see the same. I have to wonder what Bush spent $1200 a vote on in New Hampshire. If you are wondering why vote buying works with blacks not white, maybe black voters have more integrity.
* Hillary cannot win an election where white voters are a majority. She absolutely requires the black, “Hispanic”, and Asian vote shares of Barack Obama. But she does not attract the enthusiasm that came to Obama naturally (cf. the epic fail of Martha Coakley in the 2010 MA Senate election – the bruthas just won’t turn out for the icy white b*tch).
Therefore, Hillary! and her team will need to drive the minority vote in a way that Team Obama did not have to do. This means #BLM and all the other racial signaling they can come up with.
BUT
As the first explicitly anti-white Presidential candidate in history, running against a candidate promoting white interests in a more or less open way, she may well drive the GOP (or Trump Party) white vote share to 65% or more, finally validating the Sailer Strategy.
Will Steve Sailer be the new Karl Rove?
Posted inAmerica|Comments Off on The Unbearable Whiteness Of Bernie Sanders’ Support
I don’t think the primary reason is because they fear for Israel or for Jewish safety. I think their primary fear is a loss of power and prestige under President Trump. This is largely about ego and status.
Much of what the American Jewish establishment (organizations like the ADL, SWC, AIPAC, and SPLC) supports (multiculturalism, more immigration, war overseas) is bad for America.
Ex-ADL chief: Trump’s ‘raise your hand’ gambit was deliberate, Nazi-style ‘fascist gesture’
Abe Foxman calls episode ‘about as offensive, obnoxious and disgusting as anything I thought I would ever witness in the United States of America’; says Republican candidate knew exactly what he was doing.
WASHINGTON — Former Anti-Defamation League director Abe Foxman excoriated Donald Trump for urging his supporters at a weekend rally to raise their right hands and promise to support him, a gambit Foxman said evoked echoes of Hitler salutes from Nazi rallies in the 1930s and ’40s.
“Let’s do a pledge. Who likes me in this room?” the Republican presidential candidate asked a large crowd Saturday in Orlando, Florida. “Raise your right hand: ‘I do solemnly swear that I — no matter how I feel, no matter what the conditions, if there’s hurricanes or whatever — will vote, on or before the 12th for Donald J. Trump for president.’” (Trump misstated the date of the Florida primary, which will be held on March 15.)
As the audience enthusiastically complied with his request, the candidate told them: “Don’t forget you all raised your hands. You swore. Bad things happen if you don’t live up to what you just did.”
For Foxman, who was born in Poland in 1940 and was saved from the Nazis by his Catholic nanny, watching Trump whip up his supporters in this fashion was extremely disturbing.
“As a Jew who survived the Holocaust, to see an audience of thousands of people raising their hands in what looks like the ‘Heil Hitler’ salute is about as offensive, obnoxious and disgusting as anything I thought I would ever witness in the United States of America,” he told The Times of Israel.
“We’ve seen this sort of thing at rallies of neo-Nazis. We’ve seen it at rallies of white supremacists. But to see it at a rally for a legitimate candidate for the presidency of the United States is outrageous.”
Beyond his horror at seeing a hand-raising tactic similar to that adopted by the Nazi Party to signal obedience to their leader, Foxman said what made the Trump episode more egregious is his conviction that the Republican frontrunner was well aware of the resonance.
“It is a fascist gesture,” Foxman said. “He is smart enough — he always tells us how smart he is — to know the images that this evokes. Instead of asking his audience to pledge allegiance to the United States of America, which in itself would be a little bizarre, he’s asking them to swear allegiance to him.”
Furthermore, Foxman added, “He even threatens that if they don’t, they will suffer and be punished. This is so over the top for a man who really doesn’t come out of the underground. He is a man of the world. Even though he proclaims he doesn’t know who David Duke was, or the other white supremacists, we know very well that he knows. So he’s playing to an image.”
Last week, Trump refused to immediately reject the endorsement of Duke, a white supremacist and former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan. When asked by Jake Tapper on CNN, Trump claimed ignorance of Duke’s support or that of other white supremacists backing his bid for the White House. After a storm of controversy erupted over his response, Trump tweeted his disavowal of Duke later that day.
‘This is the summit of his own intoxication with what he perceives as his leadership quality’
Saturday’s incident, according to Foxman, marked the low point of a series of campaign controversies through which Trump has not merely managed to survive as a candidate, but to benefit. “I think he was intoxicated with all the things that he’s already got away with, and it led him to this,” said Foxman, who spent his adult life fighting bigotry, including a three-decade stint as national director of the ADL. “This is the summit of his own intoxication with what he perceives as his leadership quality.”
While Trump’s behavior during this election season has been the source of much consternation for Foxman, he finds it even more troubling that the billionaire businessman evidently appeals to such a large segment of the American public.
“When he said, ‘I can walk down the street on Fifth Avenue and kill somebody and my supporters will not desert me,’ he knows exactly what buttons he’s pushing. Or when that guy interrupted his speech. People in that situation may think internally, ‘Oh, I want to punch him in the mouth.’ But you don’t say it, you don’t say it, because it’s not civilized. But he said it and it was applauded,” Foxman lamented.
Posted inADL|Comments Off on Jewish Establishment Increasingly Unhinged By Donald Trump
Steve Sailer writes about Super Tuesday: Hillary had a good day piling up delegates, but she didn’t generate much excitement among Democrats in the states where she cruised to victory by getting her core loyalists to dutifully turn out.
The early word is that Hill and Bill, realizing they don’t have much to say for themselves, are planning to run a negative, ugly campaign against Donald Trump, with lots of charges of sexism and racism.
* 20% of backs have above average IQ’s and they have been pummeled by the loss of manufacturing jobs at least as badly as whites. At the moment, they all vote Democrat, but could enough of them go over to Trump to swing the election?
In Britain, blacks are recent arrivals and will never vote anything other than Labour. US blacks are, like it or not, old stock Americans.
In NZ, Polynesians will always vote Labour, because they think Labour gives them more free stuff, but the decline of manufacturing has knocked Maoridom for six.
In reality National (the NZ equivalent of the GOP) has been at least as willing to throw money at them as they are tangata whenua (people of the land).
If an indigenous Brit called himself indigenous, unemployment would be instantaneous.
* True, that Hillary doesn’t excite much of anyone on the democrat side, but Trump does inflame many of all political persuasions. Thus, while D turnout in the primaries is low, that doesn’t translate to a low General Election turnout for the democrat nominee. Hate/fear incites action as much as love, maybe more, I maintain.
Assuming Trump survives the coming GOPe onslaught and evil convention and post-convention machinations, etc,. his ability to win the General against Hillary will rest with his ability to sound like the logical, smart guy he actually is behind the scenes. That might not move a fair number of dems to go to the polls and vote for him, but it WILL make them stay home.
* #1 — Cheap Labor
The Democrat and establishment Republican line is that our labor market should be open to the world–that you deserve nothing as an American. Do you really want to be competing for your job with anyone who shows up at the border, from millions of Indians and Chinese. What sort of lifestyle does Hillary have in mind for you working at Indian or Chinese wages? No matter what color you are … this is a shitty deal.
#2 — Why we can’t have nice things — Diversity Creates Conflict
Trump needs to nail precisely the ideas behind Steve’s “why we can’t have nice things”. The Sanders SWPLs want to live in (70s era) Scandinavia … but you can only do that when you have a coherent, competent, high-achieving, high-trust society. We don’t have that now–never did to the same level as Scandinavia–and Hillary’s diversity program makes it worse and worse and worse.
Diversity creates conflict. Tiny diversity may add spice–ethnic restaurants! But big scale diversity means differences–in behavior, in achievement, in success–and creates friction and conflict.
The examples write themselves:
– diversity and conflict around the world
– BLM — increased crime; black men need to obey the same rules as white men; there isn’t some sort of “you get to assault a cop” rule for black thugs; if they don’t want to, then separate communities–same community and different standards creates conflict
– muslims
“blood borders of Islam”–everywhere they are mixed with anyone else –> conflict and violence
America has a particular culture–sort of Anglo\Christian. Muslims never had any presence here and that’s been to America’s great *benefit* … why import divisiveness and conflict; to me as a businessman that’s just insanity, you don’t set out to make your problems worse
#3 Gender gap — Male bashing and “marriage vs. spinsterhood”
To win Trump will need to at least somewhat neutralize Hillary’s “girl power” nonsense.
First off, take a strong stand against the Democrat’s male bashing. Strong, productive men actually hold this joint together.
A good line for Trump, is he has plenty of women in the Trump organization, doing business stuff, but his buldings are put up by guys–steel, concrete, piping, heating, AC, plumbing, hanging drywall, etc. etc. Out in the world: drilling for oil, designing engines, airplances, running power plants keeping your lights on, refineries gas for your car, fixing your car, building houses, installing your furnance and keeping natural gas in the pipe to keep it going. Hillary’s spent her life doing absolutely nothing productive so she probably doesn’t realize it–doesn’t *want* to realize it and thinks it all “just happens”. It doesn’t. It’s guys out there making our modern American lifestyle possible.
Secondly take on *real* gap–single vs. married.
Say explicitly there’s less a “gender gap” than a married gap. Democrats do well with single women who don’t have husbands and want the government to take care of them–by collecting money from all the guys out there that haven’t married them. Married women are much more Republican they look at their husbands paycheck and think “that’s mine”–that’s for *our* family, our children. They don’t want to hand it over to Hillary to spend.
Trump should face the camera “I want to speak to young women out there who think Hillary’s laundry list of things she’ll do for you sounds good. Money doesn’t grow on trees. Men and women work for it. No one is entitled to be supported by someone else’s labor, someone else’s savings. Hillary promises to go out and loot men to give you stuff. I suggest that if you want some guy’s money–you marry him. That’s a fair deal. Find a good man with prospects, marry him, build a family together taking care of yourselves. And that will be easier to do when i’m president and America isn’t flooded with cheap foreign labor. But that’s really your choice. If you want a government supported spinsterhood–vote for Hillary. If you want to have a husband, children, a *family*, then vote for me.”
If Trump wants to win, he’s going to have to tackle these iSteve themes *head on*. Telling me Hillary is ugly or a bitch …useless. Every guy with two in the sack knows she’s the screechy “progressive” version of the controlling tell-everyone-what-to-do church lady from hell. Trump needs to say what needs to be said. Say it clearly and ram it home again and again and again.
* Trump has already signaled what he will do against “sexism” etc. Highlight Bill Clinton’s rape charges and compare him directly to Bill Cosby. Hillary had said that line for a while, Trump brought up her Husband’s actions, and she shut up. I’m sure she will go at it again, but Trump is not Romney — the weak loser who wants to lose and roll over and show his tummy.
Trump has ample ammo — Bill Clinton and credible rape charges, that Hillary and Bill were happy to take his money before, Hillary’s email server, the Clinton Foundation corruption machine, etc.
I would have expected that Obama would have quashed the email investigation long ago, my guess is that he will have Hillary! indicted right before the convention, and Sanders figures this too so he’s staying hoping to make a deal with Kingmaker Obama. My second guess is that Obama already has someone in mind and its not an aging Jewish guy who gets on his nerves for existing — but someone Black and easily controlled.
Re Trump, Christie is not a dummy, he’s already on board, and I expect a fight between those elected Republicans who are not part of the Washington axis — and the Romney types. Trump has shown ambition can be served not by foam party antics and donor pandering but by base satisfaction, and there is a whole slew of elected Republicans who would like to advance just by the means Trump has. My guess is that a rump of Republicans form a new party, but end up taking enough Bernie Bros unhappy with say Al Sharpton or Kamala Harris or Spike Lee as the nominee.
Dems really are the Black Party, Republicans are now the White party, and White women are the only wild cards. White women have big issues with White men — they don’t need or want beta male provision and beta male placating and such enrage them. Moreover White women are allied with Blacks in all sorts of ways — principally to jettison White men save the Alphas and take over spoils in AA raiding parties. Europe’s immavasion suggests we are near the end of that free ride however. A society cannot run on White female disgust at the lack of sexy dominance of beta White males. Which is what Hillary’s entire career really has been, if you think about it.
Posted inAmerica|Comments Off on Hillary’s Depressed Turnout
Daily Mail: Jewish teacher who claimed he was attacked by ISIS jihadists is arrested by French police who allege he LIED about the assault
Tzion Saadon, 45, claimed he was attacked by ISIS jihadists in November
He said he had been beaten up by three men claiming to represent ISIS
But police today said he had been arrested for allegedly making up story
In January, another teacher was sent for psychiatric tests after admitting he lied about an attack in his classroom
The teacher, who worked at the Yavne Jewish school in the southern city, claimed two knives were used to slash him in the arms, legs and stomach.
However, there were no independent witnesses, and forensic examinations later suggested Saadoun had caused the knifes lashes himself.
Gilad Atzmon writes: After a three month investigation, police have now decided to charge him with lying to police and disrupting an inquiry.
In December, another pro-Israel teacher was taken into custody after saying he was attacked by an ‘ISIS aggressor’.
Stephane Aroule, 45, is also said to have tried to spread hatred against Muslims by fabricating the stabbing.
He sparked a full-scale terrorist alert when he said a man wearing a balaclava and brandishing a box cutter and scissors had entered the Jean-Perrin nursery school in the Paris suburb of Aubervilliers. The area has a large Muslim population, many of whom have complained of stigmatisation in the wake of the terrorist attacks last November.
Police took Aroule to hospital, but he only had self-inflicted scratches on his body and was quickly released.
Following questioning, he confessed to making the story up to try and spread mistrust and suspicion of Muslims.
The conclusion is inevitable. Rather than a rise in anti semitism in Europe what we see here is a growing manifestation of kosher psychosis.
Posted inJews|Comments Off on Two Jewish Teachers Make Up Claims That They Were Attacked By ISIS
* Put Morgan Freeman in every movie and make sure the credits proclaim ‘This film is based on a story’ by a Dontravious or Shaneeka along with ‘technical assistance’ provided by some other minority and you are in the clear.
* Any chance of seeing that on basketball teams?
* To the list of people I’m considering performing my upcoming heart surgery I’ve added the names Tiger Woods, Kanye West, Shug Knight, and Rachel Dolezal.
Mind you, they’ll also be the first names I’ll scratch off the list. But they’re on the consideration list, and that totally makes up for the fact that they have zero chance of making the cut.
* Where do people get this idea that groups should reflect the racial or whatever makeup of society at large? Except to the people who’d directly benefit from it (not counting those of us who get to enjoy diversity and vibrancy), what is the motivation? Seems like pure madness. Might as well say your family should be 18 percent Hispanic.
* As a young guy trying to make it in the worst job in Hollywood, the amount is reverse discrimination towards men of pallor is pretty staggering. It’s literally the least visible major player in a production, so much so that nobody really knows what even really successful screenwriters look like unless they are also directors. But god help you if your invisible, unappreciated creative generator is melanin deficient.
Take a look at the new Ghostbusters tripe, ye mighty, and despair for the bottomless chasm that is “diversity in Hollywood.”
* I don’t know if intellectually is the right word, but there is a body snatchers feeling behind superficially entertaining J.J. Abrams films. They are less stories than they are a series of things happening, most of which are reminders of other movies you’ve seen before. What is the point, I ask, of Star Trek Into Darkness (has there been a blander title, outside of “force awakens?”) turning suddenly into Star Trek the Wrath of Khan, other than that it was the second in the new series and second Star Trek movies are The Wrath of Khan?
Abrams is the perfect moviemaker for this era of Hollywood, which aside from kiddie and horror films doesn’t know how to sell tickets but by spending wads of money on repackaging things we’ve already seen before. At least with his movies it’s not merely the title you’re buying. He tries hard to give you the actual old experience, or in the case of Star Trek, more the Star Wars experience with characters named Kirk and Spock. But it’s a terribly soul sucking experience for me. I’d rather theaters be ghost towns.
* JJ Abrams is well-placed to be the most famous film-maker of all time.
His two great strengths are mindless PC conformity and mindless, derivative re-makes.
In these days of #OscarSoWhite, it’s obvious what his career path should be…
Remake all famous Hollywood movies with casts that “reflect America.”
For example, DeMille’s The Ten Commandments with Mestizo Moses… Moses takes a really, really long time on the mountain and leaves the trash from his picnic lunch at the top… whether the Pharaoh in this case should be played by a black man or a white man is a hard call…
Gone with the Wind with Rhett played by a Bollywood actor. At the end of the movie, rather than walking off, Rhett starts singing about love with Scarlet and the entire cast comes on for a choreographed dance scene set to Indian music…
Citizen Kane with Orson Welles replaced by an East Asian actor… “Losebud, Losebud!”
* So far in his path of pop-cultural destruction, Abrams has produced a lot of crap [Alias and Lost both sucked, if all will pardon the mild vulgarity and insult to majority taste] and has killed both Star Trek and Star Wars for me.
[Yes the last couple of Trek movies before him also sucked in a different way; but he produced a couple of millennial-style action-comedy high-gloss parodies and called them ‘Star Trek’. His Star Wars was actually less well-written or acted than the originals. Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher aren’t exactly Olivier and Leigh, but they did a better job in 1977-83 and even in 2015 than the wooden puppets and hysterical emoters of the new cast. Hamill’s facial expression in his one scene carried more weight than Daisy Ridley’s entire performance. Personally I read his eyebrows as saying ‘who are you to be carrying that lightsaber, you punk kid?’]
Rant over.
J.J. Abrams is the most overrated writer/director/producer of the century to date. I am impressed by his lack of shame, at least.
Posted inHollywood|Comments Off on Does Diversity In Hollywood Mean Fewer Jews?
After taping John Stossel’s show on May 15 in New York, the Mrs. and I took the 10 a.m. Acela back to Washington. Once we had boarded the train, who should come waddling up the aisle but Bill Kristol.
The Weekly Standard editor seemed cheerful, and we chatted about the surge in Mitt Romney’s popularity and prospects.
I did not ask what he had been doing in New York, but thanks to the website Mondoweiss, I found out. Kristol was there for a May 15 “debate” with Jeremy Ben-Ami of J Street, the pro-Israel organization, at B’nai Jeshurun synagogue on the Upper West Side.
After listening to Kristol, writes Phil Weiss, “I am still reeling.”
“Kristol was treated like royalty and came off as … a Republican Party warlord,” bragging “about how all the hostile elements to Israel inside the Republican Party were purged over the last 30 years — [and] no one [now] dared to question the power of the Israeli lobby.”
“The big story in the Republican Party over the last 30 years, and I’m very happy about this,” said Kristol, is the “eclipsing” of the George H.W. Bush-James Baker-Brent Scowcroft realists, “an Arabist old-fashioned Republican Party … very concerned about relations with Arab states that were not friendly with Israel….”
That Bush crowd is yesterday, said Kristol. And not only had the “Arabists” like President Bush been shoved aside by the neocons, the “Pat Buchanan/Ron Paul type” of Republican has been purged.
“At B’nai Jeshurun,” writes Weiss, “Kristol admitted to playing a role in expelling members of the Republican Party he does not agree with.” These are Republicans you had to “repudiate,” said Kristol, people “of whom I disapprove so much that I won’t appear with them.”
“I’ve encouraged that they be expelled or not welcomed into the Republican Party. I’d be happy if Ron Paul left. I was very happy when Pat Buchanan was allowed — really encouraged … by George Bush … to go off and run as a third-party candidate.”
Kristol’s point: Refuse to toe the neocon line on Israel, and you have no future in the Republican Party.
Ben-Ami seemed equally exultant: “We’ve won the war; we won the war,” he told the audience. Ninety-nine percent of Congress now votes almost 100% pro-Israel.
But Ben-Ami appeared nervous about how this unanimity in the Congress behind Israel had been achieved:
I very seriously and absolutely do believe that a significant percentage of American members of the House of Representatives and the Senate are intimidated on this issue (of Israel). … They worry about the ramifications of speaking out. … They are worried about the attacks that they will receive.
Ben-Ami said the 50 members who have criticized Israel are courageous, but “another 200 are scared to do it.” Haaretz.com reports Ben Ami as saying congressmen “live in fear” of the Israeli lobby.
Kristol laughed at this and dared Ben-Ami to name them.
When Ben-Ami brought up the destruction of Palestinian rights on the West Bank and said Hillary Clinton repeatedly raises this issue with Israel, writes Weiss, “Kristol sniggered.”
It’s a “myth,” said Kristol, that Arabs care about Palestinians. The Israeli occupation on the West Bank can last for 45 or 60 years more. Bill Kristol on Palestinian rights sounds like Bull Connor talking about Negro rights in Birmingham in 1965.
Another source says Kristol predicted that Sen. Joe Lieberman, whose voting record is closer to Socialist Bernie Sanders’ than to conservative Jim DeMint’s, will be secretary of state in the Romney administration.
A former head of the Israel lobby AIPAC describes Lieberman as “the No. 1 pro-Israel advocate and leader in the Congress.”
Joe led the cheers for our last three Middle East wars — and has pushed for two more, against Syria and Iran.
About Kristol’s comments, a point of personal privilege.
George W. Bush never “encouraged” me to go third party. At the Iowa straw poll in 1999, he asked me to stay in the party, and party chair Jim Nicholson came to my home to make the same request.
At the synagogue, Kristol was never asked about his role in the Iraq War that he and his collaborators pressured Bush to wage as “Israel’s fight against terrorism is our fight.”
Some 4,500 Americans died in that war, 35,000 were wounded, and 100,000 Iraqis perished, leaving half a million widows and orphans.
Result: U.S. influence in the Middle East is at a nadir. Al-Qaeda has spread into Pakistan, Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, Syria, and North Africa.
Now the neocons are worming their way into the Romney camp, dropping us hints on whether John Bolton or Joe Lieberman will be the next secretary of state.
Has Gov. Romney imbibed the Kristol Kool-Aid that caused the war and cost the party Congress in 2006 and the presidency in 2008?
Hard to believe, but we should find out before November.
Posted inIsrael, Pat Buchanan|Comments Off on How Bill Kristol Purged the Arabists
* We have an interest in protecting Europe and Israel from Muslim takeover. Every year white Christiandom retreats a little bit more to Islam. Europe and America get a little more Muslim, and the remaining Christians are murdered and expelled from their scattered enclaves in the Middle East, the remnants of the days when white Christian Romans and Greeks ruled all of the middle east/north africa from Casablanca to Kuwait.
Israel is the only place in the entire world where the tide is moving against Muslims, where they are in a geographic, political, and demographic decline. We need to support them both as allies and as examples.
* The neocons aren’t the Jewish establishment (which is moderately left-wing), the neocons are a bunch of intellectuals who moved right when the USSR turned on Israel and are now drifting back because they see the Trumpists as sort of like the American equivalent of Polish peasants with pitchforks.
Being only a halfie I can see both sides–I get that everyone’s afraid of Weimar 1933, but that country had only a few decades of democracy and a whole third of the country that wanted to go back to monarchy. The DNVP didn’t have a rabbi opening their convention in the 1930s.
* 1. Left-wing Jews feel a need to identify with the oppressed (they are leftwingers after all), and Trump’s racism (such as it is) reminds them of old antisemitic statements. A lot of it is Ellis Island worship, more or less, as well as ‘They came for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up because I wasn’t a Communist…’ The idea is that because of their history of persecution, they have a duty to speak up for other persecuted groups.
2. Neocons are scared s***less of white supremacists and neo-Nazis. I think the Israel issue is secondary here; everyone gets fed endless Holocaust stories (yes, I agree it happened, the point is they’re constantly reminded about it in childhood) and a lot of them see Nazis under every table.
I’d like to see Trump force the Israelis to the negotiating table; this settlement thing isn’t sustainable over the long-term. They’re overplaying their hand, and it won’t end well for them.
* I actually think Nuland is acting in her capacity as an agent of the American empire, not as a Jew. They want to weaken Russia as a rival power, so they support Ukrainian separatism.
For my part, I want to see America strong, but I don’t think extending a rival alliance to Putin’s borders is such a hot idea.
* Yeah, they’re all massively triggered – not rational at all. Even the pundits I didn’t know were Jewish are uncontrollably outing themselves in frenzy. It would be quite comical if this sort of thing didn’t have a habit of ending in tears.
* Jewish voters and congressmen strongly opposed the Iraq War, more than any other group except black congressmen.
* The people who opposed the Iraq invasion were (1) White “racists”, (2) Lew Rockwell libertarians, (3) Justin Raimondo, and (4) miscellaneous alt-righters. Remember, disagreeing with something and opposing something are not the same thing.
* Once the genie is out of the bottle the worry is what comes next? And is what comes next controllable by Jewish elites? However, the problem with this line of thinking is that the typical paranoia of Jews assumes that what comes next is gong to be anti -Semitic whereas there is no reason it has to be.
I mean Reagan was was for free markets (and people were very scared of him IIRC), but thirty years later are we living in a libertarian wet dream? No. Just because there is drift toward nationalism, to correct thirty years of not giving a fuck about the working poor and middle class (uncontrolled immigration and terrible trade deals that only benefit the 1%) who are primarily White does not mean we will have the rise of Nazism. For Crying out loud, Donald has Orthodox Jewish grandchildren!
Given the quite horrible way starting with Clinton that two parties have conspired to screw the American public for the benefit of Wall Street and the Chamber of Commerce, do they really expect that there would no reaction? Are they that insane and deluded? Trump is just a mild but energetic expression of these pressures.
Whites in particular are undergoing a “soft genocide” (TM) (i.e.,unlimited immigration, outsourcing, in sourcing, and affirmative action, and demonizing being White in the press and media) as is evidenced by the much talked about change in White longevity in the USA. Do people think Whites will do nothing in response to these pressures? So far White despair has been inner directed in suicide by drug and alcohol abuse etc…, but is inevitable that it will become outer directed if the suffering is not ameliorated. Why, because not all Whites are inner directed who tend to self-harm under these circumstances. Most are not.
De Tocqueville observed that most revolutions start when rising expectations are dashed.
I wonder that if Donald Trump is unsuccessful in ameliorating the suffering of the White lower and middle classes, and uniting people of all races, we will than get a real firebrand …someone more along the lines of a real Hitler?
I wouldn’t be surprised if this were to happen. I think that is the greater danger IMO, because it will entail a lot of suffering by everyone Whites included.
* Israel has a high birthrate and immigration rate, and it is quickly filling up the good parts of the West Bank with settlements. My problem with their policy is that it is too influenced by religion rather than plain nationalism. The perfect example of this is Hebron. It once had a large Jewish community and religious significance to them (supposedly the burial site of Abraham, Issac, and Jacob), but was ethnically cleansed by Muslims a long time ago. Right now out of a population of 200,000, about 500 are Jews. Keeping them safe requires a lot of resources and it is just stupid for them to be there. There are no important resources, and it antagonizes the Arabs to no good end.
Much better to just divide up the area into as few pieces as possible.
* I’m an unabashedly philosemitic Christian. I like and respect Jews. I like and respect Israel. All I want is a Likud-like nationalism for the U.S.
I’m like Matt Damon’s character in “The Good Shepherd.” The Catholics have their church. The Jews have their traditions. Us Protestants? We’ve got the United States of America. That’s our Pope and our Israel. Why is that so bad? We don’t want to put anybody in ovens. We kind of like people who forcefully stand up for themselves. Why aren’t we allowed to do that?
* “The non-Europeanization of America is heartening news of an almost transcendent quality.” – Ben Wattenberg. He also noted that “melting pot” Zangwill was a Zionist, which in a definition of the time was “a Jew who tries to persuade a second Jew to convince a third Jew to emigrate to Palestine”.
The members of the Lobby don’t live in Israel, so its survival as a Jewish state is not their true priority. They are primarily interested in how they can be important people in the US. Arguing for Israel to do what it needs to do in order to survive as a Jewish state, which happens to be something only President Trump might accept, would damage their personal prestige.
Wattenberg is quite representative of influential Jews, inasmuch he rehashes the greatest hit (condemning white gentiles as perpetually teetering over a slippery slope to a Fourth Reich) while ignoring or hand waving about Israel’s situation. He is patted on the head for that, as a good little boy, and gets to feel important.
* Haaretz is a left wing rag representative of virtually no one in Israel but the far left. This is like quoting the Nation as “the view from America”. It has the lowest circulation of any “major” newspaper in Israel but for some reason it is always quoted by the foreign press. The paper is Netanyahu deranged.
Most Israelis do not understand or care about US domestic politics. But Trump’s platform of a strong borders, protection of domestic industry and protection of the native demographic is the accepted norm in Israel and would be considered utterly unremarkable – except by Haaretz. (It is also why left wing US Jews are increasingly disenchanted with Israel.) Except for one thing, Trump himself would do well as a politician in Israel. That one thing is lack of military service.
Israel and the West, especially Europe, will increasingly diverge. First because the West becomes more Muslim and less nationalist while Israel becomes less Muslim and more nationalist. We will see which way America goes. Like the host, I am hoping we imitate Israel and not Europe.
* Speaking from personal experience, views about Trump in Israel are much more positive than in Britain. Trump, like it or not, fairly or not, is loathed across most of the White world. I saw a hilarious article in The Telegraph (Britain’s allegedly right wing broadsheet) about how Trump is a sexist pig because his wife says they don’t argue or something. Conversely 80%+ Israelis think he would be an improvement on Obama.
* Of course, in the long run, Trump has no chance since the Zionist powers-that-be are aligned against him. But he has stirred up something, and it might not go away for some time.
Obviously, the main issue is Jews vs Trump. Trump isn’t anti-Jewish but he is not solely Jew-centric, and this upsets Jews. Jewish Neocons think GOP exists to serve Jewish and Zionist interests first and foremost.
We hear all these Jews complaining about how Trump is all about the Authoritarian Personality and Paranoid Style in American Politics, but this is rather amusing coming from Jews, the most authoritarian (even totalitarian) and paranoid people in the world. Jews see Hitler everywhere. Every time there is someone in the world they don’t like, he is the ‘new hitler’ and US military must get ready to squash him. Or US must economically sanction and destroy that nation.
Trump’s business associates are Jewish. His daughter is married to a Jew and even converted to Jewishness and raised kid as Jew. But he is ‘hitler’ because he won’t give Jews 100% on everything. If Jews say Russia must be destroyed, it must be destroyed. The fact that Trump wants good relations with Russia makes him Hitler. This is rather amusing since Neocon Jews and Obama(tool of Liberal Zionist Jews) worked with Neo-Nazis in Ukraine to topple the government. And US’s invocation of human rights is so hollow since it is such close allies with Saudi Arabia, which still practices Medievialism, and with Israel, a nation founded on European Imperialism and ethnic cleansing of indigenous people. Afrikaners imposed separateness but didn’t throw blacks out of black lands. If anything, more blacks were attracted to white-ruled South Africa. In contrast, so-called Israel Democracy was made possible only because Jews secured majority status by expelling 800,000 people from Palestine. And West Bank is still under occupation and Israel used horrible violence to crush enemies in Gaza and Lebanon. (US imperialism cynically uses ‘democracy’ to invade and control other peoples. So, Zionist destruction of Palestinians was justified because… uh… Israel is a democracy and has ‘gay parades’. US does this all over the world. Economically or militarily destroys other nations in the name of spreading democracy and ‘western values’, which now amounts to planting homo flags and flooding the airwaves of other nations with Miley Cyrus concerts. If US wants to wreck another nation, we know how it will play out. US will say it was for ‘human rights’ and to spread ‘democracy’. Yeah, like in Iraq and Libya. And to support ‘moderate rebels’ in Syria when, in fact, they are just Alqaeda with a new name. But then, US is is the nation that once supported Osama Bin Laden as ‘freedom fighter’.)
US cooked up bogus claims against Gaddafi to crush him and destroy Libya but allows Israel to amass 300 illegal nukes and go on occupying and stealing Palestinian land. US thinks it is morally superior and has the right to push the world around because… uh.. lessee… it has ‘gay marriage’. Imagine that. So, Russia is Eeeeeeeeeevil because it doesn’t have ‘gay marriage’ and doesn’t permit homo paraders to desecrate Red Square that commemorates the sacrifice of 20 million Russians in WWII.
We know that the homo agenda is the proxy of Jewish globalist imperialism. It is funded by Wall Street, Hollywood, Las Vegas, Silicon Valley, Harvard, Yale, and etc. dominated by Jewish interests. It is to undermine national cultures and make them easier for globalist penetration. In the US, you will now be destroyed professionally if you express disdain for homosexual lifestyle. That is called ‘freedom’ and ‘tolerance’. Jews are very clever. They gain AUTHORITARIAN control over us but then call it ‘freedom’ and ‘liberty’. We live in a nation where someone cracking a joke about Bruce ‘Caitlyn’ Jenner can end up in hot water. And millennials raised by PC helicopter parents no longer value free speech. 70% of millennial freshmen want free speech suppressed if it offends certain favored groups, esp Jews, blacks, and homos. As for Russians, Iranians, Chinese, Muslims, and etc, they can still be bashed since Jews hate them. Look how Jewish Neocons are using Poles against Russia, Japanese against China, and the vile Saudis against Iran. The Saudi case shows that the Jewish-Homo campaign is a cynical ploy. If it is so important, why push it on Russia and Japan but not on Saudi Arabia? Because Saudis are close allies of the US. It comes under NO human rights scrutiny. Obama and Hillary, both shills of Jews, call Putin the ‘new hitler’ even though homosexuality is legal in Russia, but shake hands with Saudi royals who preside over a nation where homos and others can be beheaded for the slightest infraction.
Anyway, just look how Jewish Power and AIPAC pressures all US politicians to pledge to Israel. What do Mitt Romney and Bernie Sanders have in common? They both cheered the mass killing of women and children in Gaza. Even though Jews occupy Palestinian lands, we must make believe Jews are under attack by ‘nazi’ Palestinians.
Jews are only 2% of population but control so much. But Jews see no problem with that. Jews bitch about how ‘white privilege’ is unfair and that certain groups are under-represented, but that’s all just smoke-and-mirrors to hide the fact that it is Jewish privilege, not white gentile privilege, that is totally out of control. Indeed, white gentile representation in elite colleges is way below the national share of the population. But Jews hide Jewish privilege behind ‘white privilege’ and then blame white gentiles, indeed as if Wall Street, Hollywood, Silicon Valley, and etc are dominated by Southern hillbillies and Texan cowboys.
And look at the Fed. It’s been Jewish controlled for as long as I can remember. This Yellen is yet another Jew, and she got some guy named Fischer, an Israeli to boot, to work alongside her. Now, if someone noticed that there are ‘too many Jews’, Jews would scream antisemitic. But these Jews always bitch about ‘too many whites’. The Hypocritical Style of Jewish Politics is incredible. And it is Ethno-Authoritarian, predicated on the notion that the 2% should rule over the 98%. Jewish attitude toward Americans is like British attitude toward Indians during imperialism. The small minority should rule over the rest. Yet, Jews bitch about Authoritarian Personality. Talk about projection!
Neocons are a small percentage of the Republican Party, but they insist that GOP serve Zionism and Jewish centrism above all. Talk about authoritarian, or even totalitarian, personality.
Hillary is supposed to be a ‘progressive’, but she turns her nose up at Palestinians who still live under occupation because she takes money from Goldman Sachs. And so-called ‘progressive’ Jews find nothing wrong with Jews getting special favors from Hillary and other whore politicians.
But if you notice Jewish power, you end up like Rick Sanchez or Helen Thomas (whose great sin was having said that European Zionist imperialists should go back to Europe. Why is that offensive? Why Gandhi wrong when he said Brits should go home? Was Ho Chi Minh wrong when he said Americans should go home? Were the Algerians wrong when they said French imperialists should go home?) Jews bitch about authoritarian McCarthy, but McCarthy was around for just few yrs. Jewish authoritarianism that destroys careers and silences voices never goes away.
It should be obvious that Jews were never about free speech. They just invoked it to gain power. It was all about SPEECH CONTROL. When Wasps had speech control, Jews resented it because they wanted it for themselves. So, Jews invoked ‘free speech’ to weaken and undermine wasp power. But once Jews gained the power, they began to silence and destroy everyone they didn’t like.
This is classic Jewish Authoritarian Personality in action.
GOP welcomed Neocons into the party, but when Neocons took power, they purged everyone they didn’t like. They acted just like the Bolsheviks.
Yet, these Jews bitch about how OTHER people suffer from ‘authoritarian personalities’.
So, what Jews really wanted was not free speech for all but free speech as temporary weapon to gain power of speech control. Now that Jews got speech control, they wanna shut people down and push European-like laws where people can be fined and jailed for speaking truth to Jewish Power. Jews cleverly use terms like ‘hate speech’, but of course, they decide what is ‘hate speech’. Zionism, an ideology that called for massive ethnic cleansing, Jewish racial consciousness, Jewish nationalism, and ruthless violence against Palestinians is NOT hate speech according to Jews. But if you one notices the truth and says ‘Jews control US politicians like so many whores’, oh that is ‘antisemitic hate speech’. Very very clever.
Now, I think mindless anti-Jewishness is wrong because there are plenty of conscientious and decent Jews. But most Jewish people don’t have the power. We have to focus on Jewish Power, and it is evil, corrupt, dishonest, repressive, and exploitative. Just like there were many decent Germans in Nazi Germany but were ineffective against evil Nazi power, there seem to be many good Jews in the US but are ineffective against Jewish Elite Power that is hellbent on spreading wars all over, destroying lives who don’t celebrate homosexuality, silencing and purging all critics of Israel and Zionism, the hate ideology of Jewish supremacism against Palestinians.
The evil Powerful Jews in California and Florida are even passing laws banning BDS movement and forbidding anyone associated with it from doing business with the government. Imagine that! And there is total silence about this even in the Liberal Jewish community.
When Jewish power runs amok, it does things like this:
Given what happened to Russia due to globalist Jewish conniving, you would think at least the nice conscientious Jews would try to understand the Russian position and work toward mutual understanding.
Instead, Jews push pussy riot and homo agenda on Russia as part of globalist Zionist-US imperialism, and when Russia pushes it back, Jews cry ‘authoritarianism’ and ‘repression’.
Now, are Russians trying to force Russian Orthodox ideology or Russian nationalism on Americans? NO. Russians just wanna mind their own business. it is the Jewish-controlled US that uses its military and financial and cultural power to force the homo agenda on other nations. So, Jews are the aggressive cultural aggressors but cry ‘victim’ when other nations say, “No, we don’t want this garbage.”
While tolerance for homos is a good thing, why would any nation want to celebrate homsexuality? How would Americans like it IF, say, the Chinese were into incest and tried to push ‘incest marriage’ and ‘incest pride parades’ on the US and then accused US of being ‘new nazis’ for not allowing it?
But this is what Jewish globalist imperialists do with the homo agenda. It is a new form of imperialism masked as ‘spreading human rights’.
Of course, US is a paragon of human rights because Christian bakers who won’t bake cakes for ‘gay weddings’ are fined, economically destroyed, and sent to jail.
Imagine if incest-lobby forced ‘incest marriage’ on everyone and then used government to destroy businesses that won’t cater to ‘incest marriage’.
This homo stuff isn’t about equality. It is about homo supremacism promoted by Jews to institutionalize elite minority domination, an idea favored by Jews because Jews are elite minorities in US and EU.
Of course, what I’ve just written would be called ‘hate speech’ in so-called bastions of higher education that are supposed to encourage free debate and speaking to power. There is no way to rise up in academia or media unless one kisses the ass of Jewish supremacist power. No matter how respected your reputation, if you displease Jews, you are finished and will end up destroyed and lonely like Helen Thomas. No one came to her aid when she was destroyed for speaking up for her ethnic brethren.
American moral logic goes as follow:
If a Jew says “It was great for European Jews to drive out indigenous Palestinians and grab the land and force Palestinians to live under Jewish occupation”, he or she is showered with prizes and given a seat at Harvard, Goldman Sachs, and the Fed.
If an Arab-American says, “European Jews who stole land from Palestinians should return the land and go back to Europe”, he or she is destroyed on the spot, and no one come near him or her lest they be destroyed for ‘guilty by association’.
Yet, Jews bitch about how OTHER people suffer from ‘authoritarian personality’ disorder.
* Nancy was widely derided by everyone for being a controlling astrology-following bitch, but she loved Ronnie, knew he had enemies, and did her best to protect him.
* It seems to me that Jimmy Carter—the man, though perhaps not the presidency—is slowly being rehabilitated by history, while in the case of Ronald Reagan the process is moving in the opposite direction. I cannot help but think that with the passing of Nancy Reagan, another incremental step has been taken towards the eventual “historicization” of the man and his legacy, and it will not redound to the benefit of either. Now that the old widow is not around to defend him, or to have her sensibilities offended, the critics will have a freer hand
A curious thing, is death. For as long as a person is alive his deeds are not quite set in stone, for he can still do something to atone for them or revise them or improve them, to change the overall picture of the life he bequeaths to posterity. When death comes the moment of finality has set in. It’s not that new information cannot continue to emerge about a person that might alter our perceptions of him, but that he can no longer do anything to alter his legacy. The facts are now firmly set, awaiting only to be brought to light in the land of the living. As the dead go before God to receive their judgment, the living are left to deal with their aftermath for good or ill.
Immediately after death there exists a brief span of time wherein the person seems not to have really died but only stepped away somewhere, as if separated from us by the thinnest of veils. Nancy Reagan is in that time as I write this. It is a powerful time when prayers avail much, so pray for her soul if you believe her not to be damned. If you think her beyond hope, pray for your own soul that you not share a similar fate.
* Their main failure was as parents.
Their kids. Geez.
Posted inAmerica|Comments Off on Nancy Reagan, RIP
* I think that constitutes a confirmation of the sagacity of all the Jewish billionaires who have rallied around (and financed) Marco Rubio. They really do have the pulse of America. It’s no wonder they control Hollywood. They have an unerring instinct for the schlock that Americans like to buy. It also confirms that saying that Jews like to live like Episcopalians and vote like Puerto Ricans. I believe Puerto Ricans seem to share the same beliefs. They want to live like Jewish billionaires and vote for Marco Rubio.
Posted inPuerto Rico|Comments Off on Puerto Rico Boosts Marco Rubio
"This guy knows all the gossip, the ins and outs, the lashon hara of the Orthodox world. He’s an [expert] in... all the inner workings of the Orthodox world." (Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff)
