Laurie Luhn, alleged ‘whore’ for Fox pervert Roger Ailes, doesn’t seem so innocent in this scheme

Linda Stasi writes: Laurie Luhn, the latest woman to accuse ex-Fox boss/perennial pervert Roger Ailes of sexual harassment, is now saying she only became the disgusting old pervert’s “whore” because she thought it would advance her career.

And it did. She went from his cash whore to his on-the-books madam. And now she’s so upset — after 20 years and a $3 million settlement — that she had to tell all: to New York magazine reporter Gabriel Sherman.

Meantime, during those 20 years Luhn accepted more no-show jobs than Dean Skelos’ son. In fact, at one point she was making $250,000 a year as a Fox events planner without events. Well, that’s not quite true, since she actually planned some events. Like? Like trysts with Ailes and then, after he got tired of her, trysts for Ailes.

She indicates it started out innocently enough with her simply wanting a job in media.

Seriously? If a disgusting creep dangles a job, and then asks you to show up at a hotel in a garter belt, chances are good he’ll be dangling more than just a job.

In this case, she says he dangled what one of his victims described as his “raw hamburger meat.” OK, that’s enough to wreck the sex lives of every adult in America right there.

Did she think part of the job description as media adviser was exotic dancer? Who wouldn’t confuse the two?

When the dancing was done, “Ailes told her to get down on her knees in front of him,” she said, and put his hands on her temples … ‘Tell me you will do what I tell you to do, when I tell you to do it. … Do you understand? You will follow orders.’”

Did she run out screaming into the night into the nearest precinct to report him? No, instead she continued in an arrangement that paid her well.

Ailes told her she was his whore. And she was. After he got her to involve other women in S&M sex, he’d leave a grand on the dresser.

When he put her on the Fox News payroll, he allowed her to hire staff — good-looking only.

stasi31n-2-web

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on Laurie Luhn, alleged ‘whore’ for Fox pervert Roger Ailes, doesn’t seem so innocent in this scheme

Black Lives Matter Turns Against Israel

Dennis Prager writes: Many progressive Jews are shocked that Black Lives Matter (BLM), a movement they support, has turned out to be virulently anti-Israel — to the extent that in its new platform, it charges Israel with “genocide” against Palestinians. Their response calls to mind an event of nearly 50 years ago.
In 1970, the most famous American classical musician of the 20th century — Leonard Bernstein, the conductor of the New York Philharmonic and a major composer (“West Side Story,” operas, etc.) — along with other men of the left, both black and Jewish, threw what probably became the most notorious private fundraiser in American history at his Manhattan penthouse.
The honored guests were the Black Panthers, an America-hating, police-hating radical Black group, a sort-of predecessor to BLM. In the words of liberal writer Adam Gopnik in the latest issue of The New Yorker, the Panthers were “mindlessly cruel, misogynistic gangsters, capable of acts of torture and murder … ”
Here is how Panther leader “Field Marshall” Don Cox began the evening:
“We call [the police] pigs. … We recognize that this country is the most oppressive country in the world, maybe in the history of the world. The pigs have the weapons and they are ready to use them on the people. … They are ready to commit genocide against those who stand up against them.”
Bernstein did not express a word of protest, let alone end the fundraiser, after hearing police labeled “pigs” and America labeled “the most oppressive country in the world.” In fact, Bernstein (who, to make the parallels even sharper, was very pro-Israel) pledged his entire fee for conducting the opera “Cavalleria Rusticana” to the Panthers. Four other prominent Jews — film director Otto Preminger, lyricist Sheldon Harnick (“Fiddler on the Roof”), lyricist and composer Burton Lane (“Finian’s Rainbow”) and renowned art dealer Richard Feigen — then made their pledges.
Prior to the Bernstein event, another Jew in the arts, film director and producer Sidney Lumet, also threw a party for the Black Panthers at his home.
As New York Magazine reported:
“Ray ‘Masai’ Hewitt, the Panthers’ Minister of Education and member of the Central Committee … laid it on the line. … If buildings were burned and other violence ensued, that was only part of the struggle that the power structure had forced the oppressed minorities into.”
No country in history has treated its Jewish citizens as well as the United States has, yet left-wing Jews have supported almost every left-wing group that depicts America as an oppressor (and as war-mongering, imperialist, systemically racist, etc.).
But this love for the left has never been reciprocated. The left (not traditional liberals, it must be noted) has been Jew-hating (and later, Israel-hating) throughout its history.
Jews adored Karl Marx for well over a century, but that grandson of two Orthodox rabbis wrote one of the most influential anti-Semitic books of the 19th century (“On the Jewish Question”).
Shortly before he died last year, Robert Wistrich, the head of Hebrew University’s Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism, wrote a devastating book on left-wing anti-Semitism (“From Ambivalence to Betrayal: The Left, the Jews, and Israel”).
And one of America’s most prominent liberals, professor Alan Dershowitz, has just written an article titled “Are Jews Who Refuse to Renounce Israel Being Excluded From ‘Progressive’ Groups?”
Professor Dershowitz’s answer is, of course, yes. The “progressive groups” cited in the Dershowitz article have contempt for America — and America-hatred and Israel-hatred always go together.
“Last year,” Dershowitz wrote, “Rabbi Susan Talve, a longtime activist on race issues in the St. Louis area, was told that her advocacy for Israel was incompatible with the objectives of Black Lives Matter: ‘Solidarity from Ferguson to Palestine has become a central tenet of the movement’ she was informed, because ‘Israeli and U.S. state oppression are deeply interconnected.’
“Similarly,” Dershowitz noted, “a student who attended a Black Lives Matter rally at Northwestern University last year was told, ‘you support Israel, so you cannot also support us.’ ”
Dershowitz then lists other major left-wing groups that are anti-Israel:
“MoveOn, CodePink, Occupy Wall Street, and Black Lives Matter [have] become openly opposed to the nation state of the Jewish people.”
And all these groups are supported by left-wing Jews.

Posted in Blacks, BLM | Comments Off on Black Lives Matter Turns Against Israel

Some Deep Thoughts on ‘War Dogs’

Ann Marlow writes for Tabletmag.com:

The pair of Jewish losers at the heart of the new arms-smuggling serio-comedy ‘War Dogs’ remind us that losers who dream big may be losers, but at least they dream big”

As we’ll learn, Efraim is a shadow of a human being, without the ability to connect to others through friendship, love, or family. Yet he’s also charismatic because he is someone who loves how he spends his time. We’re supposed to identify with David, an attractive nebbish in a pink polo shirt carting a massage table around, but we’re mesmerized by Efraim, loud, crude and one-dimensional though he is.

Efraim and David spend almost all their waking hours in an office that’s basically a desk and a Scarface poster, staring at a U.S. government defense-procurement website and trying to figure out a way for their tiny firm, AEY Inc., to fulfill the contracts too small for established businesses to want to bid on. The movie makes it look like enormous fun. Because their business day begins again at midnight Miami time, morning in Eastern Europe and the Middle East, the boundaries of work and play are diffuse. Because of this, and because these guys are in their 20s, there’s a lot of weed smoked and, eventually, coke snorted. It’s not so different from The Social Network, except that Mark Zuckerberg was creating something, and Efraim is just a middleman between arms buyers and sellers.

But the biggest difference between these guys and Silicon Valley is in style. The dudes are Jewish, just like Zuckerberg, but they’re from an insular, probably lower-middle-class Jewish background, while Zuckerberg went to Exeter and spent a couple of years at Harvard. (It seems Diveroli and Packouz are Sephardic.) They could just as well be Italian- or Irish-Americans—anyone who grew up in a tight-knit ethnic enclave, who got seed capital from a guy with a chain of dry cleaners (in real life, apparently, the financier was a Mormon in Utah) not a venture capitalist. Efraim has more in common with Melanie Griffith’s working-class striver from 1988’s Working Girl than with the privileged wonks of The Social Network; he was kicked out of high school after ninth grade and was just 18 when he started AEY. (The movie has them the same age, early 20, but David is really four years older.)

Of course, Efraim isn’t meant to be a role model. He’s open about his use of prostitutes; in fact, he’s unable to imagine any other kind of relationship with a woman. When he sees a girl he likes in a nightclub, he offers her $1,000 to blow him in his car, saying, “Why don’t we pretend we’ve had the three dates.” (Her boyfriend saunters by and decks him.) There are signs early on that Efraim’s also unable to be the “best friend” to David that he claims.

The two men get a huge, historic ammunition contract—but they make a sloppy mistake, and their comeuppance is only a matter of time. And as the business expands, Efraim spends more time doing cocaine and becomes suspicious and mean. We sense his unraveling in a scene of a trainee orientation. At the end of his spiel, Efraim asks if the trainees have any questions. “What does AEY stand for?” one guy asks. Efraim says, “It doesn’t stand for anything. Like IBM. Does IBM stand for anything?” The trainee says, “Well, actually it does. It stands for International Business Machines.” And Efraim shouts at him, “Get the fuck out of my office!” Then, “Anyone else have a question?” Silence. That bullying moment is, in fact, pure Trump. And you know then that Efraim is killing his newborn company…

War Dogs doesn’t offer any easy answers; the potential happy ending for David comes with moral ambiguity. Everything costs something. But the movie forces us to ask: Why not try for the big time, whatever that means to you?

I would have thought the message was don’t cheat people because people remember when they’ve been ripped off. And if they’ve been ripped off by Jews, they may well hold their resentment against all Jews.

Posted in Articles, Hollywood, Jews | Comments Off on Some Deep Thoughts on ‘War Dogs’

Donald Trump Jr. Retweets the ‘Neo-Nazi Movement’s Favorite Academic’ Kevin MacDonald

Comments at the Forward.com:

* 1. Forward prefers an ad hominem against someone supporting an anti-Clinton allegation to investigating the tweet for its content and the content Kelly’s interview with Wohl.
2. It’s twitter, most people there retweet others without doing a full background check and cavity search that Mr. Feldman engaged in.
3. If Forward’s standard for disqualifying someone from presidency is their child’s retweet of someone even the child is likely not to know everything perfectly, why doesn’t Forward do the same to Hillary Clinton? Surely, her association with the Blumenthals is much more intimate than Trump’s son’s retweet.
(BTW, I do not know for whom I will vote if for either of the candidates at all. I am not sold on Trump, so that path of responses to me is pointless.)

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on Donald Trump Jr. Retweets the ‘Neo-Nazi Movement’s Favorite Academic’ Kevin MacDonald

Trump vs. Hillary on Immigration

Steve Sailer writes: Commenter “Tim Howells” writes:

I loved the speech. It was the first Trump speech that both the fire and spontaneity of the stadium stump speeches and the focus and brilliance of the policy speeches. This was one for the ages. Taken together with the triumphant diplomatic trip to Mexico, this is the most astounding political coup I can remember. The lead up with the “to be determined” waffling was brilliant as well. The idiot press took the bait hook line and sinker, and now are stuck with having given huge exposure to this particular speech. I’m really looking forwards to watching them squirm. Ending it with the families of the victims was absolutely the right move.

Immigration policy is about the fundamental question of politics: Whose side are you on?

Trump Goes to Mexico was brilliant because it made clear that he was totally cool with the President of Mexico putting Mexico First. After all, that’s the President of Mexico’s job. People are better off when political leaders look out for the voters who put them into office.

Hillary says Trump wants to reduce immigration because he’s Ravaged by Hate, while (like Jeb) She Loves Mexicans. But Trump replies that he wants to reduce immigration because as President of the United States, putting America First would be his job.

COMMENTS:

* I was told that actually appealing to the citizens of a country was filthy POPULISM which leads to all kinds of horrors … like Big Business having to pay decent wages.

* It’s well established in the ‘sphere that Jeb’s Mex-loving is a result of being the dorky black sheep of his family. He got an Inca because he lacked the ability to get a White girl. HC loves Mexico because she’s a typical hysterical menstrual hag who hates Straight White Men but loves her Wall Street (((in-laws))) cash.

* I’m watching the opening of “CBS This Morning”, 7 am EDT. The lead story is that Trump’s visit to Mexico was a “Fail” and his speech was a contradictory mess that nobody (outside of the cheering knuckle-draggers) saw any merit in. Nimble, clever Hillary can’t help but gloat, at least a bit.

My Nice Liberal Lady wife pursed her lips and shook her head. So would you, if you thought you were watching the news.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Trump vs. Hillary on Immigration