Daily Mail: A company claims it can identify terrorists, paedophiles and ace poker players simply by looking at their face.
Faception, an Israeli start-up, says its technology can spot character traits that are undetectable to the naked eye.
The company claims its software classified nine of the 11 Paris massacre jihadists as terrorists from their facial features without inputting any prior knowledge of their involvement.
It appears to have been so successful, the firm says it is now working with a homeland security agency to help identify criminals.
Shai Gilboa, Faception chief executive, said: ‘We understand the human much better than other humans understand each other.
‘Our personality is determined by our DNA and reflected in our face. It’s a kind of signal.’
The firm, which was founded in Tel Aviv in 2014, has developed a database of 15 classifiers which Gilboa says are used to determine personality traits with 80 per cent accuracy…
The Faception website says: ‘Utilising advanced machine-learning techniques, we developed and continue to evolve an array of classifiers.
‘These classifiers represent a certain persona, with a unique personality type, a collection of personality traits or behaviours.
‘Our algorithms can score an individual according to their fit to these classifiers.’
However, experts questioned whether the technology could lead to a Minority Report-style system of justice where people are placed under suspicion before they have even committed an offence.
They also warn that such software is often only as accurate as the information that is programmed in in the first place.
Pedro Domingos, a professor of computer science at the University of Washington, said: ‘Can I predict that you’re an axe murderer by looking at your face and therefore should I arrest you?
‘You can see how this would be controversial.’
Gilboa says the company will never make his classifiers that predict negative traits available to the public.
LATEST POSTS:
- Faculty Fashion Trends Since The 1960s
- The Bliss
- Yale YT Course: Introduction to the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) (RLST 145) with Christine Hayes
- Jason Arday – Serial Fabulist, Plagiarist & Dissertation Supervisor
- LAT: ‘Payouts in L.A. County’s $4-billion sex abuse settlement delayed to two largest law firms’
- The Comparator Test: Does Penn Apply the Same Standard?
- PragerU Salaries & Bonuses
- The David Pinsof Story
- Added Context to the Dennis Prager-Cedars Sinai Lawsuit
- The Criticism Was Right and It Did Nothing: Andrew Gelman, Seth Roberts, and the Limits of Being Correct
- What Andrew Gelman Doesn’t Write About
- Andrew Gelman: ‘Computer scientists today are like economists in the early 2000s and Freudian psychiatrists in the 1950s’
- Virtue Signaling and the Amy Wax case
- Revisiting Virtually You: The Dangerous Powers of the E-Personality
- The Great Delusion
- Why Do I Instinctively Dislike Erik Erikson?
- WSJ: The Uninvited Guest Who Crashed Our Family Vacation: My Mom’s AI Chatbot
- WEHT to Marc Weisblott?
- WEHT to Moxie aka Madison Slade?
- WEHT to Nicholas Polson’s Archive?
BEST POSTS:
- * The Enlightenment Wasn’t Enlightened (6-23-26)
* Mr. Burge Draws The Line (6-23-26)
* 'Improving on Democracy' (6-17-26)
* People Leak To People Who Are Fun (6-11-26)
* Why Does Australia Produce So Many Great Journalists? (6-11-26)
* Steve Wynn and the Press: Power, Litigation, and the Contest Over Las Vegas (6-3-26)
* Sheldon Adelson and the Journalists (6-3-26)
* The Vigilant Animal: Thinkers Who Reject the Myth of Human Gullibility (6-2-26)
* The Cost of Refusing the Misunderstanding Myth (6-2-26)
* Show Me How It Travels (6-2-26)
* The Norm Explainers (6-2-26)
* Centering Marginalized Voices (6-1-26)
* What would it look like if the Washington Post put its reader first? (6-1-26)
* What would it look like if the Financial Times put its reader first? (6-1-26)
* What It Would Mean for the Los Angeles Times to Put the Reader First? (6-1-26)
* What It Would Mean for The New York Times to Put the Reader First? (6-1-26)
* Why Wembanyama Lives on the Perimeter (5-31-26)
* The Emotional Palettes Of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco & Sacramento (5-27-26)
* The Administrative Capital: Sacramento Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* San Diego - The Quiet Republic (5-27-26)
* The Quiet Bar: San Diego Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* SF v LA Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* Why Talent Travels Poorly Between San Francisco and Los Angeles (5-27-26)
* San Francisco and Los Angeles as Rival Models of Urban Access (5-27-26)
* Social Cliques in New York, 2026 (5-25-26)
* Social Cliques in San Francisco, 2026 (5-25-26)
* The Rival Courts of Washington (5-25-26)
* The City of Private Rooms (5-25-26)
