* Well, Steve, French immigration policy has been an utter disaster for 50 years or more.
There is no point in reminding readers of the genesis of the disaster – the apparent need to import ‘cheap’ labor to fuel an economic boom – a boom that has petered out to a bust for the last 40 odd years.
The jobs went, but the ‘migrants’ plus then some, stayed, to the point where they will comprise a majority of births sometime in the coming decade.
A moral lesson, in glorious technicolor, one would have thought. But oh, no, neither the EU or The Economist take a blind bit of notice.
Instead, they take the typical cowardly bully’s sadistic pleasure in bashing Hungary for being ‘unEuropean’, for the crime of wishing to keep Hungary ethnically Hungarian, ironically enough, at every possible opportunity.
* The FT’s Simon Kuper, who a few weeks ago was advocating more Syrian immigration into France so he’d have a home health aid when he gets old, was at the soccer stadium during the attacks on Friday. Now he wonders whether he can stay in Paris.
* Kuper is like lots of lefty South African Jews, Illana Mercer being the rare exception having now seen the light, having spent their whole lives preaching multicultural and feminist “Jewgenic” warfare against white Christian Europeans, they scratch their heads and wrap themselves in Jewish victimology when the result of the very policies they advocated in anyway touches them.
Hey Kuper if Paris is too rough for you now why not try settling in the West Bank?
* Simon Kuper Financial Times two months ago:
A manifesto for open borders. Europe has room to spare. Many of its cities sprawled in the age of the automobile, and are now sparsely populated. Only about 2.5 per cent of the EU’s land is used for housing. There is plenty of room for migrants in Europe’s labour markets, too: “European countries are turning into old people’s homes. In 2050, I plan on being 80. Either I’ll be cared for by a robot or by a Syrian”
Simon Kuper last night at the Stade de France:
But tonight, for the first time, I am asking myself whether we can stay in Paris. Bataclan, the popular café-cum-music hall where dozens of people seem to have been gunned down tonight, is a few hundred metres from our house. (It’s also around the corner from the old Charlie Hebdo headquarters attacked by gunmen in January.)
* Europe has lots of disused cathedrals that could be leveled and replaced with council flats.
* Israel: We’ll keep Golan Heights, and you-ropeans take all the refugees (created by Wars for Israel).
Qatar: We’ll host World Cup, and you-ropeans take all the refugees (created by Wars for Sunni power against Iran and Syria).
Pattern Recognition – Jewish Semites and Arab Semites have a similar worldview.
* Lawrence Auster: Liberals do not expect mass murders to happen and are utterly shocked and surprised when they do happen. They think everything in their world is fine. They cannot take in the fact that there is a great deal of evil and madness afoot in our society. Why this blindness? Why this recurrent shock at a recurrent type of event? I think it’s because liberalism consists of blocking out all the vast sectors of reality which contradict liberal belief. One of the major sectors of reality which contradict liberal belief is evil (not counting, of course, the delusory evil of those modern witches, white conservative Christians, an evil which liberals fully believe in and are obsessed by). If evil exists, then evil is worse than the good, which contradicts the liberal belief in equality. In the world of liberalism, there cannot be any fundamental distinctions among men, such as whether they are good or evil. The only fundamental moral distinction that liberals acknowledge among men is whether they are liberal or non-liberal, with the non-liberals, who believe in moral distinctions, consigned to the outer darkness. But when it comes to real evil, as distinct from the imaginary evil of white conservatives, liberals block it out, and so they are always shocked by its repeated manifestations.
I’ve often said that liberalism, proceeding from its ideal of perfect equality, blocks out all the vast sectors of reality that contradict that ideal—sex differences, racial differences, black violence, the tyrannical agenda of Islam, the objective moral good, the conditions for the creation of wealth, and on and on. Well, since liberalism at its core consists of blocking out reality, it is no surprise that liberals also block out the fact that by blocking out reality, they are assuring the destruction of their own civilization.
* Back in August-September, when the invasion started, someone posted an article from a British newspaper which contained a still shot of the “Syrian refugees” disembarking from the ferry which carried them to Athens (Piraeus, really) from Lesbos. I found the photo so chilling that I believe I used the word “insanity.” Well, today, Anatoly Karlin has posted a blog on unz.com which contains a 19-minute video, starting with the disembarkation at Athens. http://www.unz.com/akarlin/the-paris-terror-attacks/ The video makes the scene even more disturbing. Further in (starting around 0:50 mark), the video shows a Greek woman on Lesbos understandably reacting in a very distraught manner to the “invasion” of the refugees. This video stands in stark contrast to the BS we were being fed by the American MSM. I recall former co-host Melissa Block interviewing one of her Greek husband’s cousins who happened to live on Lesbos on ATC on August 10. A more upbeat and positive report you couldn’t find. All propaganda.
* This isn’t fair to most ‘refugees’ who are certainly not terrorists.
And Drudge who is Jewish ought to be careful. After all, there were Jewish terrorists and anarchists among the immigrants who came to the US, and later a vast Jewish network shipped Stalin the secrets to the Bomb.
At any rate, the bigger problem is that most refugees or migrants or whatever are NOT killers. As Richard Spencer said in NPI speech, it would be better if all the invaders were hostile and dangerous. The fact is most are not. So, that makes Europeans complacent and accepting. But that is the real danger.
Suppose all the Africans and Muslims were smart people, diligent, and law-abiding.
Suppose there were no HBD-IQ or economic reason to keep them out. Suppose most will become good workers and tax payers.
Here’s the thing.
They would still pose a racial and demographic problem cuz Europe will no longer be European if it’s taken over by non-Europeans, no matter how hardworking and law-abiding they are.
Look at Palestine. There is no doubt that Jews are better builders of economy than Palestinians/Arabs are. Palestine/Israel is richer cuz Jews arrived en masse.
But for Palestinians, that is no consolation to the fact that they lost their ancestral lands forever. Who cares if the economy improved if you don’t even own the land of your ancestors?
So, we need to realize… most refugees are NOT killers.. and that is the bigger danger.
This will pass over, and Europe will go back to welcoming refugees as future workers and etc.
In the end, the Mexers were dangerous not because they are killers but because most of them are not. Many are okay people. So, gringos put down their guard. The result? Gringos lost CA to Mexicans, and Texas is headed in the same direction.
How nice if all Mexicans acted like Santa Anna. But they acted like Guillermo, so white folks didn’t see the threat and just saw nice lettuce pickers.
But it seems meeksicans have inherited CA built by gringos.
* I know two South African Jewish couples like this. They supported the regime change and then bugged out, and are living the upper middle class good life in SoCal. When you talk to them about their former country they kind of hedge around the issue, walking on eggshells, obliquely admitting that they had to flee before it got too late. One thing though is that even when circumspectly admitting that things went into the crapper, they still have a devotion to the memory of St. Mandela.
The working class Boers living in poverty and marginalization don’t have the money to get out, and even if they did, they still think it is their country too, and don’t want to leave. The people who fled never regarded SA as their true country.
