Jews For Consistency

“Jews for Consistency” compares the proclamations of Jewish groups with Jewish behavior, Jewish text and Jewish history.



We point out when they seek the the opposite things for Jews that they seek for non-Jews. Frequently organized Jewry pursues cohesion for Jews (in 2016 Israel’s Sephardic Chief Rabbi, in line with the Torah tradition, said non-Jews were not permitted to live in the Jewish state) but pushes multiculturalism on non-Jews (more non-white immigration into white countries, more rights for minorities such as blacks, latinos, gays, and the transgendered, more rights for atheists and less Christianity in the public square, etc). Rarely do these Jewish groups show the same concern for non-Jewish minorities in the Jewish state.





If unity, strength and cohesion are good for Jews, then these qualities are equally good for gentiles. When you maximize rights and power for minorities, as Jewish activists often try to do in the West, it always comes at the cost of cohesion for the majority. How would you like your country being disunited and fragmented? How would you like the Jewish state to stop being the Jewish state and start being another multicultural hodgepodge of warring groups? Do you want Tibet to stop being Tibetan and Japan to stop being Japanese? So why do America, England, and Australia need to lose their historic identities as Anglo countries?









We ask Jewish organizations — such as the ADL (Anti-Defamation League), the SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center), and the SWC (Simon Wiesenthal Center) — to follow the Golden Rule and to only do unto others as they would want done to Jews and to the Jewish state. If they want to wrap themselves in the mantle of Torah and tolerance, we check their claims because sometimes these groups are running a con.



In life, victory doesn’t always go to the upright, but peoples and organizations that continually operate in deceit usually come a cropper. Such behavior is not in line with Torah.

“Do what is right and good in the LORD’s sight, so all will go well with you. Then you will enter and occupy the good land that the LORD swore to give your ancestors.” (Deut. 6:18)

“Do not let kindness and truth leave you; bind them around your neck, write them on the tablet of your heart. So you will find favor and good repute in the sight of God and man.” (Proverbs 3:3-4)

No group has done more to promote same-sex marriage than Jews (it seems to me like a disproportionate percentage of Jewish men are gay) even though the Jewish tradition only conceives of marriage as occurring between a man and a woman, and the Torah describes homosexuality as an abomination. So what is going on here?






Jennifer Epstein reported for Politico May 21, 2013:

Biden: ‘Jewish heritage is American heritage’

Vice President Joe Biden spoke at length Tuesday night about the influence of Judaism on the United States, dating back to the country’s founding and to the present day as Jews helped shape views on gay rights.
“The truth is that Jewish heritage, Jewish culture, Jewish values are such an essential part of who we are that it’s fair to say that Jewish heritage is American heritage,” he said. “The Jewish people have contributed greatly to America. No group has had such an outsized influence per capita as all of you standing before you, and all of those who went before me and all of those who went before you.”
“You make up 11 percent of the seats in the United States Congress. You make up one-third of all Nobel laureates,” he said. “So many notions that are embraced by this nation that particularly emanate from over 5,000 years of Jewish history, tradition and culture: independence, individualism, fairness, decency, justice, charity. These are all as you say, as I learned early on as a Catholic being educated by my friends, this tzedakah.”
“The embrace of immigration” is part of that, as is the involvement of Jews in social justice movements.
“You can’t talk about the civil rights movement in this country without talking about Jewish freedom riders and Jack Greenberg,” he said, telling a story about seeing a group of Jewish activists at a segregated movie theater in Delaware. “You can’t talk about the women’s movement without talking about Betty Friedan” or American advances in science and technology without mentioning Einstein and Carl Sagan, or music and Gershwin, Bob Dylan and “so, so, so many other people.”
“I believe what affects the movements in America, what affects our attitudes in America are as much the culture and the arts as anything else,” he said. That’s why he spoke out on gay marriage “apparently a little ahead of time.”
“It wasn’t anything we legislatively did. It was ‘Will and Grace,’ it was the social media. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. That’s why I was so certain that the vast majority of people would embrace and rapidly embrace” gay marriage,” Biden said.
“Think behind of all that, I bet you 85 percent of those changes, whether it’s in Hollywood or social media are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense. And, I might add, it is all to the good,” he said.
Jews have also been key to the evolution of American jurisprudence, he continued, namedropping Brandeis, Fortas, Frankfurter, Cardozo, Ginsberg, Breyer, Kagan. “You literally can’t. You can’t talk about the recognition of … rights in the Constitution without looking at these incredible jurists that we’ve had.”
“Jewish heritage has shaped who we are – all of us, us, me – as much or more than any other factor in the last 223 years. And that’s a fact,” he said.
“We talk about it in terms of the incredible accomplishments and contributions” of Jews in America,” Biden added, “but it’s deeper “because the values, the values are so deep and so engrained in American culture, in our Constitution.”
“So I think you, as usual, underestimate the impact of Jewish heritage. I really mean that. I think you vastly underestimate the impact you’ve had on the development of this nation. We owe you, we owe generations who came before you,” he said.

The Forward reported June 26, 2015:

Jewish Groups (Mostly) Celebrate SCOTUS Gay Marriage Decision

Thirteen Jewish groups, among them organizations representing the Reform, Reconstructionist and Conservative streams, were among the 25 joining the amicus brief the ADL filed in Obergefell v. Hodges.
The preeminence of Jewish groups among those backing the litigants was not a surprise. In recent decades, much of the Jewish establishment has embraced gay marriage as a right equivalent to the others it has advocated, including racial equality, religious freedoms and rights for women.
Multiple groups, in their statements, cited the passage in Genesis that states humans were created “in the image of God,” which has for decades been used by Jewish civil rights groups to explain their activism.
“Jewish tradition reminds us that we were all created equally, b’tzelem Elohim, in the ‘image of God’ (Genesis 1:27), and also shows us that marriage is a sacred responsibility, not only between the partners, but also between the couple and the larger community,” the Conservative movement’s Rabbinical Assembly said in a statement.
Groups also were looking to next steps in advancing LGBT rights, including in the workplace.
“You can now legally marry in all 50 states and put your wedding on your desk and be fired and have no recourse in the federal courts,” Rabbi Jonah Pesner, who directs the Reform movement’s Religious Action Center, told JTA in an interview.
“We hope this will energize and inspire a bipartisan effort to end discrimination in the work place,” he said, specifying the “T” in LGBT – the transgendered. “People should not be discriminated in the workplace because of expression of gender.”

If same-sex marriage is such a Jewish value, how come it was unknown in Jewish life prior to the 1990s? How come the Jewish state of Israel does not celebrate gay marriage? If being transgendered is cool, how come the Torah prohibits a man from wearing a woman’s clothing?

If Jewish elites can convince much of the Western world to celebrate same-sex marriage, then is there nothing they can’t do in subverting traditional moral values.

Does anyone seriously think that if elite Jews were against same-sex marriage, we would have same-sex marriage?

Jews provide most of the funding for America’s Democratic party, much of the funding for the Republicans, we exercise disproportionate influence in media, finance, academia and law. We largely set the agenda in America. For instance, we got the country to provide Israel with over $100 billion in aid.

I don’t think these Jewish elites really care that much about gay rights, tranny rights, blacks rights except for their instrumental value in protecting Jews. It wouldn’t be human to care more about outsiders than about your own group. Jewish elites simply think that a more tolerant and cosmopolitan West is more user-friendly for Jews.

I have no problem with Jews putting Jewish interests first (and for other groups to put their own kind first). I am a Jewish nationalist. I support organization and cohesion for all groups (whites, blacks, Gentiles, Jews, Japanese, Cubans, Croats, Tibetans, etc). I want all peoples to work out their national destiny free of outside domination. I never seek anything for my group (Jews) that I would not want for all groups to enjoy (except in zero-sum cases where I side with my group in my actions while striving to remain objective in my thinking). I do object, however, when I find groups operating with deceit. As a convert to Orthodox Judaism, I speak out when Jewish groups disregard the Torah and wreak havoc on the goyim and thereby increase the likelihood that Jews will once again be thrown into a pit of death.

Life is often a vicious struggle for scarce resources such as land and water and power. Different groups, different individuals, always have different interests, which is why all relationships have stress. No two people and no two groups are exactly alike and no two countries have identical interests. As one tweet put it: “The world isn’t a party where everyone gets along. We can associate with whomever we wish & can exclude you even if it hurts your feelings.”

Groups that enjoy cohesion usually have an advantage over groups that are more individualist. If radical Jewish groups such as the ADL and the SWC can convince the goyim that nationalism is bad while Jews and other tribes enjoy that very cohesion, then the tribes get an unfair advantage until the goyim catch on and retaliate.

Major Jewish organizations often use the language of universal morality to push tolerance and inclusion on non-Jews while preserving the benefits of unity and cohesion for Jews. For instance, every major American Jewish organizations support immigration amnesty for America, but none of them support the same sort of policy for the Jewish state of Israel nor do they want Jewish synagogues and organizations flooded by non-Jews.

If Jewish organizations want to protest America being a Christian country, then they should also protest Israel being the Jewish state. If Jewish organizations want to ban hate speech, they should first turn their attention to Jewish texts beginning with the Torah and seek to ban anti-Gentile sentiments. If Jewish organizations want to protest anti-Jewish sentiments, they should protest Jews making negative comments about non-Jews. If Jewish organizations want to track down and persecute ex-Nazis, they should track down Jews who participated in genocides. If being a Nazi is horrible, then surely being a communist is equally horrible and just a couple of generations ago, a million American Jews were communists and socialists.

Now, if Jewish organizations such as the ADL and the SPLC will be honest and say that they are ethnic advocacy groups, then we’ll pay them no mind. What’s obnoxious is when certain Jewish groups push a diversity agenda on non-Jews while reserving the benefits of exclusion for Jews.

If Jews get to have safe spaces free of gentile influence, then gentiles should be allowed safe spaces free of Jewish influence. Jews have strict dietary laws (kashurt) limiting their social interactions with gentiles, why should not gentiles be allowed clubs without Jews?

If Jewish organizations such as AIPAC want to lobby for Israel, we’ll ask if these policies are in America’s interests. Every group has a right to protect its interests, and if goyim won’t stand up for themselves, Jews will have to. Perhaps Israel is the best tool we have. We can say to the world, Live like Zionists! Put your own interests first.

If Jews want to call anti-Semitism a mental illness, we’ll ask that they apply the same label to Jews who hate Gentiles.

If Jewish organizations want to make Holocaust revisionism a crime, we’ll ask that they also support criminalizing other revisions of the conventional wisdom (the crucifixion of Jesus, etc). Why should Jewish suffering be any more sacred to the world at large than the suffering of other peoples? If Jewish organizations want to push for Holocaust education in public schools, we’ll ask that this education be proportionate to the number of deaths in genocides, so that most attention goes to the genocides under communists, which were sometimes carried out by Jews (the Ukrainian famine, etc).

If it is illegal for whites to have free association and to have exclusively white businesses, white schools, and white neighborhoods, it should be similarly illegal for Jews to have free association. As a gesture of good faith, these Jewish organizations pushing for more Muslim and non-white immigration should ask Jews to experience the vibrancy of racial diversity in their own homes.

Jews have done wonderful things, and Jewish organizations understandably trumpet Jewish accomplishments, but it is obnoxious if we do not admit the negative things that Jews have done such as to promote communism, feminism, same-sex marriage, gangster rap and pornography.

In Genesis 22:18, God says to Abraham: “In your seed all the nations of the earth shall be blessed, because you have obeyed My voice.”

It’s worth monitoring the effect Jews have on the world. Jewish intellectual Paul Gottfried told me April 14, 2014: “The one indispensable element for Western civilization are the white Christians. Once they go, everything goes. Jews aren’t going to save anything except Jewish self-interest, which is often viewed as incompatible with the preservation of a Western Christian civilization. Jews typically tend to weaken that. I agree with Kevin MacDonald on this entirely. …[If] you look at Jews in today’s world, they do very much play the role Kevin MacDonald says they do.”

“To say that Orthodox Jews are less of a threat to civilization does not mean that they are an appealing alternative. They’re not as dangerous as the more assimilated Jews. It doesn’t make them the good guys. It doesn’t make them a model you want to imitate if you are interested in preserving Western civilization.”

Luke: “The Jewish response to [Kevin MacDonald] is to throw slurs rather than to rebut.”

Paul: “Yes, of course. What else do you expect? He’s questioning the nobility and high-mindedness of Jewish leftists. I wouldn’t expect any other kind of response. I don’t think the very Orthodox Jews care one way or the other.”

“The neoconservative position is that if blacks don’t like us, we have done so much for them, we have sacrificed ourselves, they should kiss our toes and support Israel and if they don’t, they’re making us suffer because they’re extremely evil. What Kevin MacDonald shows is that leftist Jews take certain positions because they’re trying to neutralize the Gentile [threat]. Most Jews I have known on the left fear white Gentiles.”

“I was listening to this guy Alan Dershowitz on a television program and he was asked if the Ten Commandments are good and he said, oh no, they’re awful. They were written for primitive people. And they have nothing to do with us. Now why would a Jew be attacking the Ten Commandments? Because he doesn’t want the Gentiles to have it. He doesn’t want them to have any religion except left-liberalism. He hates the goyim. If you read his book Chutzpah, it is even more obvious that he hates Gentiles. I’ve never seen Jewish liberalism as anything other than an attempt to neutralize a group that Jews fear and hate.”

“The neoconservatives identify America with global democracy, human rights, Jewish interests, Zionism, the struggle against German Nazism in two world wars, the victory of the Civil Rights movement. They have their own myth of America and it differs only slightly from Obama’s view of America, that America is good because it has progressed, overcome prejudice, it is universal and it is based on human rights. Other Jews on the left are more radical because they are still afraid of Christian influence. However radical Americans have become, Jews are even more radical with gay rights and things like that. Jews often play a pivotal influence in introducing new phases of radicalism.”

“Neoconservatives are selectively for academic freedom when it advances what they see as Jewish interests. They’ll say it’s everybody’s interests.”

“The Jewish positive [intellectual] tendencies are seen in science and business. Most of the Jewish cultural [and political] influence in America is very bad. I just don’t see the good cultural influence of Jews.”

Luke: “Have Jews collectively been more of a blessing or a curse to the United States?”

Paul: “I think it is mixed.”

Luke: “What do you think about the accusation that American Jews have dual loyalties [to America and to Israel]?”

Paul: “I could say what the late Joseph Sobran said, ‘What’s so dual about it? Is there any country but Israel for them?’ That’s partly true. Theoretically, they love Israel as a Jewish land but they are not going to go there to live. It’s some distant country they admire. In traditional Jewish circles [outside the haredim], anything for Israel is good. But they’re not going to leave the United States. They have a physical and financial and residential attachment to the United States.”

The philo-Semitic blog Gates of Vienna contained this challenging comment about Jews:

But they are never over-represented in organisations or movements that represent the interests of the ethnic majority, only those that weaken that majority. That is why they’ve been expelled from so many very different countries over so many centuries. Yet with the possible exception of Albert Lindemann (Esau’s Tears) they never want to know the reasons why they’ve been so disliked in order to prevent more tragedies in the future. Instead they dismiss all anti-Semitism as scapegoating…

If they are over-represented in the intelligentsia then they had disproportionate influence in the direction the intelligentsia took. Many Russian intellectuals were Slavo-philes. Before Jews could access the most important U.S. universities the old WASP intelligentsia in the U.S. was much more traditionalist.

Torah wants Jews within the Torah Corral. It’s when they leave it and start pushing radical politics that I get nervous.

Ashkenazi Jews have the highest average IQ of any people (somewhere between 105 and 120). As the journal Social Psychology Quarterly reported in 2010:

More intelligent people are significantly more likely to exhibit social values and religious and political preferences that are novel to the human species in evolutionary history. Specifically, liberalism and atheism…

The theory suggests that more intelligent people are more likely than less intelligent people to adopt evolutionarily novel preferences and values, but intelligence does not correlate with preferences and values that are old enough to have been shaped by evolution over millions of years.”

…Kanazawa argues that humans are evolutionarily designed to be conservative, caring mostly about their family and friends, and being liberal, caring about an indefinite number of genetically unrelated strangers they never meet or interact with, is evolutionarily novel. So more intelligent children may be more likely to grow up to be liberals.

As one goy wrote to Steve Sailer: “Having a separate–racially or culturally or simply in identity–elite group is very, very bad for a nation as the American experience with the Jews has shown. (I think basically it’s turned out to be fatal. Though in fairness a good part of that is that the white package of traits–cooperation, altruism, high-trust–which makes *closed* white nations so pleasant, is also easily exploitable by hostiles.) I have about as much desire to be lectured to and bossed about by Ivy educated Chews like Amy Chua’s kids–or the insane “mattress girl”–as i do by the Jews themselves–i.e. zero. Asians *may* integrate and see themselves as just “Americans”, better than the Jews–not having a 2000+ year tradition of explicit religiously mandated majority hostility. But … who knows? Bringing more and more of them over here, to purge smart white guys from tech jobs is unnecessary, dangerous and wrong.”

Another goy tells Sailer: “I’ve grown to really hate my country, America. So many self-interested traitors seeking immigrant votes, cheap labor, or social status. Anti-whites control and run everything. Nobody will dare espouse explicitly pro-white views in mainstream discourse, but many will preach with smug self-righteousness about how it is a moral imperative for whites to be replaced and for the world to become a non-white planet. California girls used to be regarded as some of the most beautiful women in the world, but today that state is overrun by endless waves of brown masses. There’s just no resistance to the rape and defilement of America. Even Jeff Sessions will only talk about immigration in economic terms. No mainstream figure will take a stand for white people.”

Reacting to the growing anti-Israel sentiment on America’s college campuses, a goy wrote in 2016: “Dear Jew, So, spending the last half century suppressing identity politics among White males, while simultaneously promoting identity politics among everyone else, isn’t working out like you had hoped? Man, I really feel bad about that. Who could have foreseen that there might be drawbacks?”

Chateau Heartiste posted in 2015: “Race is not a social construct. Society is a racial construct.”

Social construct is a Jew construct.

The entire push of social construct is to deny the existence of that which the Jew finds threatening.

Social construct is a Jew construct, i.e., that which can be used as a cudgel against the majority population to make Jews safer.

All of this makes sense if we accept that Jews fear goyim (whites) more than any other people (especially since the Shoah) and consider them their greatest rival. Most American Jews, for instance, hail from Eastern Europe, where their ancestors lived for centuries hating and being hated by the goyim.

The greatest threat to Jews from Euros in the 20th century was being identified as an alien elite tribe.

Chaim Amalek: “The greatest threat to Jews from Euros in the 20th century was being machine gunned into a ravine, enslaved and starved to death, or being rounded up and stuffed into a gas chamber.”

Luke: Exactly. Once the Jew was understood as a hostile, alien elite harming tribal interests, he was removed from power in a way that made sure the removal of power was permanent. Jews are right to fear being identified as a hostile alien elite. Bad things happen during bad times.

Can a Jew be a German first? A Pole first? A regular citizen of a European nation-state? Some can, but the averaging identifying Jew is a often Jew first in his identity and thus primarily loyal to his fellow Jews. It’s a tribal mentality, which is different from the mentality of the white non-Jewish citizen of Germany, France, Poland, Ukraine, Sweden, Norway, England, America, etc.

The Jewish response to The Jewish Question (JQ) was to render the question moot.

If there is no such thing as race or tribe from a DNA perspective, then the JQ is silly.

We do have the problem that certain tribes are obviously different and that’s why terror is needed and propaganda to deny reality. That’s why we must restrict speech to protect the elite, to protect the Jewish construct that race means nothing, that national borders mean nothing, that multiculturalism and diversity are good for Gentile nations (though not good for the Jewish state, where the minority Arab population is a curse).

The reason anyone who notices racial differences is called a Nazi is not because they are one or have anything in common with one per se, but rather, because Jews fear recognizing racial differences will inevitably lead to them being outed as an alien elite. It is because Jews fear the Nazis are right on this critical issue (that Jews are different).

Jews are a people who dwell apart, just as the Torah says.

Chaim Amalek: “But why do so many WASPS internalize that world view (they do have agency in this matter)?”

Luke: Left-wing Ashkenazi Jews pull a sleight of hand and pull and twist the WASP’s natural rugged individualism to radical individualism. It is nowhere the WASP would go on his own, but once women are politically empowered (they are always more prone to the needs of the individual), they are particularly vulnerable to the radical Ashkenazi Jew’s machinations on this issue. Hasidic Jews, by contrast, leave the wider goy society alone and don’t push radical social engineering like communism, feminism, multiculturalism, open borders, etc. They stay within the Torah Corral. Jews who live within the Torah Corral don’t try to reconstruct Gentile society.

You can have social democracy or you can have multiculturalism.

Social democracy is inherently more vulnerable than capitalism.

But even a heterogenous population is not necessarily a safe place for social democracy, as we learn from Israel.

You can have social democracy, or you can have haredim.

You can still have some social democracy with haredim, but not social welfare. Anything with a nipple on it will have 12 heimeshes sucking on one tit, and 12 tichels sucking on the other.

The most natural thing for an animal — any animal, insects too — to ask when their environment begins to change is, “Is there something that is f***ing up my s***?”

Jews think they are pre-empting this question being asked by bringing in a whole host of outsiders and eventually curtailing free speech through Hate Speech laws. But none of this will matter.

The white nationalists (WNs) already understand who is changing their environment, who is changing their society and when the economy and/or grid collapse, the opium quickly wears off.

A better bet would have been to avoid bad times, and to work towards the betterment of the majority population, which is a risible idea both to WNs and to the major Jewish organizations. Ultimately, on the current path, Organized Jewry is fighting a war it cannot win. This is the real source of WN disdain.

If the Jew had a chance in hell of coming out on top, they would at least gain respect, but because the Jew is inevitably going to face destruction for this course of action, the WN is disgusted. The Euro goy has no understanding of why in hell anyone would want to insist on a lose/lose scenario.

This is what Nixon meant when he said, “It may be they have a death wish, that’s been the problem with our Jewish friends for centuries.”

The older I get, the more I feel that much of life is fated. I live my life forward, believing I have free will, but when I look back, I see the hand of fate.

Some Jews, as result of their people living for centuries in an atmosphere of mutual loathing with the gentiles of Eastern Europe, have a tribal addiction to hating the goyim. As I posted November 17, 2015:

Third-generation Holocaust survivors have suffered terribly. You’ll notice them up in arms on Facebook today demanding that America take in more Muslim refugees. They will not rest until they’ve turned America into a hellhole like Paris and as a result, they’re put in camps and shoveled into ovens. They have a deathwish. They suffer from a tribal addiction to try to destroy the goy’s racial, national and religious identity by overwhelming him with non-white and Muslim immigrants.

These radical Jews, who are never traditional Orthodox Jews, will not rest until America is destroyed by Islamic and non-white immigration. They are full-bore pro-refugee, even more so after the recent terror in Paris.

Some of these Jews are neo-cons, some are Republicans, but most of them are on the left. They desperately want attention, they want to provoke the goyim, and at heart, they don’t realize this, they’re yearning to be thrown into the ovens.

These destructive pro-Islamic refugee Jews have to be stopped by their fellow Jews or all Jews in the West are going to be thrown into a pit of death.

If Hitler had known what we know now — that all major American Jewish organizations and media would push for ever more non-white and Islamic immigration until national Gentile identities are drowned — he would have insured there were more survivors (because they are so destructive and seemingly prove he was right). Just look at the harm these few thousand pro-non-white immigration Jewish elites have done to America, Australia, Canada and Europe. Jews who push for more Syrian refugees into the US and Europe are unconsciously seeking for all Jews to be thrown into concentration camps. If these pro-Islamic immigrant Jews are not stopped, America and the West are sunk and Jews are headed for another pit of death.

Jews who advocate for Syrian refugees to come to the West show that whites were not entirely wrong in their perception of their self-interest in resisting Jews who wanted to escape Hitler and take up residence in their lands (USA, Canada, England, Australia, etc).

The Catholic Advocate in Australia in 1938 did not want to take in Jewish refugees: “If the present policy of admitting large numbers of Jewish immigrants is continued, we are likely to be confronted by a rapid increase in anti-Semitism. … The Jews are not simply an international religious body like the Catholics: they are a nation with well-marked characteristics, both mental and physical, with their own virtues, vices and talents, and with their peculiar loyalties. … It is the sense of this difference which has caused friction between the Jew and his hosts throughout the ages, and which has constantly brought tragedy to the Jews.”

Australian nationalist P.R. Stephensen wrote in 1940:

The answer to Semitism is anti-Semitism; and when Jews gain too many advantages for themselves, by their practice of self-segregation, they invariably find (and surely should expect to find!) that the majority of non-Jews will resent, and eventually will curb, the privileges which the Jews have won for themselves by concerted sectional action. That is what will inevitably occur in Australia sooner or later, if a large colony of self-segregating Jews is allowed now to establish itself in our community…

It is well known that there are many Jews who are good citizens, honest and cultured, despite the reputation of the generality of their kind of being financially “tricky”, unscrupulous, and parasitical. That there are intellectual and sensitive Jews is also as well-known as that there are many “Flash Yids” who degrade and debase public culture. No case can be made against Jews generally, except … that their insistence on racial self-segregation is anti-social, considered from the point of view of the community as a whole. We cannot concede to them in Australia a right which, if conceded in perpetuity to other types of immigrant … would lead to the sectionalizing of the community and its disunification. … The remedy is that the Jewish Race should abolish itself, by becoming absorbed in the common stream of mankind. [Otherwise] we others, who are so strictly excluded from the Jewish community, have at least a reciprocal right to exclude them from ours.

Maybe he wasn’t entirely wrong.





About Luke Ford

I've written five books (see My work has been noted in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and 60 Minutes. I teach Alexander Technique in Beverly Hills (
This entry was posted in Anti-Semitism, Diversity, Europe, Israel, Jews, Nationalism. Bookmark the permalink.