You usually do people a favor when you stop them from repeating themselves. You minimize the embarrassment of their bad behavior, you minimize your own resentment of their wasting your time, and you provide them with valuable social cues.
Men often interpret silence as agreement or interest, so they continue talking until an external signal stops them. A well-placed interruption provides that signal, establishing a boundary that keeps the conversation efficient. It is a practical intervention that prevents wasted time and maintains the balance of the interaction.
Also, if you are like me and tend to be way too passive (when I describe verbal abuse I receive, my successful friends often say they wouldn’t put up with that for one minute), interrupting people who repeat themselves builds the muscle of standing up for yourself, and the stronger this muscle, the more often you will want to use it in its right place.
I have a low tolerance for boring conversations. I rarely let people hold me hostage this way, and when I do, it is usually in the context of doing a desperately lonely person a kindness.
I’d usually rather be on my own reading a book than enduring the boring.
Now a limit. My personality takes this tendency too far for my own good. I naturally gravitate towards too much isolation, so I force myself to socialize more than I want to, and to accept that human interactions can’t be optimized in the same way as solitary routines. I have to accept a lot of boring talk to get to the good stuff. So I make decisions about which persons and communities receive my greatest forbearance in exchange for the greatest bonds.
LATEST POSTS:
- The Criticism Was Right and It Did Nothing: Andrew Gelman, Seth Roberts, and the Limits of Being Correct
- What Andrew Gelman Doesn’t Write About
- Andrew Gelman: ‘Computer scientists today are like economists in the early 2000s and Freudian psychiatrists in the 1950s’
- Virtue Signaling and the Amy Wax case
- Revisiting Virtually You: The Dangerous Powers of the E-Personality
- The Great Delusion
- Why Do I Instinctively Dislike Erik Erikson?
- WSJ: The Uninvited Guest Who Crashed Our Family Vacation: My Mom’s AI Chatbot
- WEHT to Marc Weisblott?
- WEHT to Moxie aka Madison Slade?
- WEHT to Nicholas Polson’s Archive?
- Cohen Passes His Own Audit (V2)
- Andrew Gelman & the E-Personality
- ‘(1) “Do you think the culture of research has genuinely changed since the replication crisis became widely discussed, or has it mostly generated new compliance rituals around pre-registration and open data while leaving the underlying incentive structure intact?, (2) Regarding Columbia University, “is there a statistical or social scientific way of understanding how institutions lose the ability to accurately perceive their own situation?”’
- What a Public Audit Does (V4)
- Post: ‘Nathan Cofnas the Schlimazel’
- Philip N. Cohen and the Sociology of the Denominator
- Measuring the Same Thing Twice (v3)
- Rebecca Sear: ‘National IQ’ datasets do not provide accurate, unbiased orcomparable measures of cognitive ability worldwide’
- The More I Love, the More Careful I Am
BEST POSTS:
- * The Enlightenment Wasn’t Enlightened (6-23-26)
* Mr. Burge Draws The Line (6-23-26)
* 'Improving on Democracy' (6-17-26)
* People Leak To People Who Are Fun (6-11-26)
* Why Does Australia Produce So Many Great Journalists? (6-11-26)
* Steve Wynn and the Press: Power, Litigation, and the Contest Over Las Vegas (6-3-26)
* Sheldon Adelson and the Journalists (6-3-26)
* The Vigilant Animal: Thinkers Who Reject the Myth of Human Gullibility (6-2-26)
* The Cost of Refusing the Misunderstanding Myth (6-2-26)
* Show Me How It Travels (6-2-26)
* The Norm Explainers (6-2-26)
* Centering Marginalized Voices (6-1-26)
* What would it look like if the Washington Post put its reader first? (6-1-26)
* What would it look like if the Financial Times put its reader first? (6-1-26)
* What It Would Mean for the Los Angeles Times to Put the Reader First? (6-1-26)
* What It Would Mean for The New York Times to Put the Reader First? (6-1-26)
* Why Wembanyama Lives on the Perimeter (5-31-26)
* The Emotional Palettes Of San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco & Sacramento (5-27-26)
* The Administrative Capital: Sacramento Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* San Diego - The Quiet Republic (5-27-26)
* The Quiet Bar: San Diego Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* SF v LA Legal Culture (5-27-26)
* Why Talent Travels Poorly Between San Francisco and Los Angeles (5-27-26)
* San Francisco and Los Angeles as Rival Models of Urban Access (5-27-26)
* Social Cliques in New York, 2026 (5-25-26)
* Social Cliques in San Francisco, 2026 (5-25-26)
* The Rival Courts of Washington (5-25-26)
* The City of Private Rooms (5-25-26)
