I don’t care deeply about any 2025 movie. Am I missing something?

Gemini says: Movie fatigue is a common result of a landscape dominated by sequels and brand expansions. 2025 has seen plenty of those, with movies like Zootopia 2 and Avatar: Fire and Ash breaking box office records. If those feel hollow, you might find more substance in films that focus on the social logic and power struggles you often analyze.
The Secret Agent by Kleber Mendonça Filho is a political thriller set in 1977 Brazil. It follows a technology expert on the run and uses a grindhouse style to examine social commentary and the dangers of the state.
No Other Choice by Park Chan-wook is a dark comedy about a man who is laid off from a paper company and becomes desperate to eliminate his competition for a new job. It is a sharp look at corporate hierarchies and the lengths individuals go to preserve their status.
Marty Supreme by Josh Safdie stars Timothée Chalamet and explores the world of professional ping pong. It fits into the tradition of American movies about talented but difficult men navigating competitive subcultures.
Sinners by Ryan Coogler is a horror film that deals with heritage and cultural erasure. It became a significant cultural event by challenging traditional Hollywood portrayals of the Black experience through a genre lens.
Blue Moon by Richard Linklater stars Ethan Hawke as lyricist Lorenz Hart. It takes place over a single night and focuses on the dissolution of his partnership with Richard Rodgers, capturing the melancholy of being left behind by a collaborator.
LF: “I respect The Secret Agent, Marty Supreme, Sovereign, and One Battle After Another because they all kept my attention, which is my primary request of a movie, but I am not able to summon passion for them. I think Sovereign cut me the most deeply because I recognized in the father and son my own proclivity for thinking I am smarter than everyone else, for my isolation bleeding into a desperate need to believe that unlike people who are successful, at least I see through the BS, for buying into conspiracy theories, for making confident pronouncements about things I don’t know much about, for developing my own cult following, and for acting in an arrogant and self-destructive manner while intoxicated by my own righteousness.”
Gemini says: Recognizing yourself in the father and son in Sovereign suggests you have a high degree of self-awareness regarding the costs of intellectual isolation. That film captures the specific trap where a person turns their alienation into a badge of superiority to avoid the pain of being an outsider.

When you live primarily in your own head or within a small, devoted circle, your ideas don’t face the friction of reality. This lack of resistance often leads to the intoxicating righteousness you described. The “logic of the fringe” allows a person to feel like a prophet among sheep, but it usually results in the self-destruction portrayed in the movie because the world does not bend to a private reality.

That desperate need to believe you see through the BS is often a shield. It protects you from the fact that “successful” people might actually possess a type of practical knowledge or social competence that you find difficult to replicate. Turning that difficulty into a moral or intellectual failing of the “masses” is a common way to preserve the ego.

The film serves as a mirror for the danger of becoming a closed loop. It is a cautionary tale about what happens when a person stops seeking truth and starts seeking ammunition for their own importance.

That specific recognition of the “logic of the fringe” suggests you are looking for works where intellectual isolation is not just a setting, but a character flaw that leads to a warped reality.

Films
The Brutalist by Brady Corbet follows László Tóth, a Hungarian architect and Holocaust survivor who arrives in America with a purity of vision that borders on pathological. Like the father in Sovereign, Tóth possesses a terrifying certainty in his own genius. His story is a study of how an uncompromising ego, when met with the transactional nature of power and patronage, leads to a “hollow monument.” It captures that specific intoxication where an artist or thinker views everyone else as a philistine, eventually destroying his own linkages to family and reality to preserve his “purified” vision.

Conclave by Edward Berger is a political thriller that examines the “sin of certainty.” It follows Cardinal Lawrence as he manages the election of a new pope. While it is about an institution, its core conflict is the psychological battle between those who use dogma as a shield for their own ambition and those who realize that absolute certainty is a form of spiritual and intellectual blindness. It mirrors your observation about making confident pronouncements about things one doesn’t truly know, showing how righteousness is often a mask for a desperate need for control.

Books
The Shards by Bret Easton Ellis is being adapted into a series for 2026. Set in 1981 Los Angeles, it follows a 17-year-old version of Ellis at an elite prep school. It masterfully portrays the “buffered identity” of a young man who considers himself a chronicler of his peers’ vapidity. His isolation and arrogance lead him down a path of paranoia and conspiracy as he becomes obsessed with a serial killer. It explores the danger of being a “self-appointed outsider” who uses his perceived intellectual superiority to justify a lack of empathy and a descent into self-destruction.

Dangling Man by Saul Bellow is a classic that remains a sharp look at intellectual stagnation. It follows a man waiting to be drafted into the army who spends his days in a small room, growing increasingly alienated and arrogant. He writes in his journal, making scathing judgments about the “successful” people around him. It captures the exact “bleeding” of isolation into a need to believe that one sees through the BS, while in reality, the protagonist is simply rotisserie-ing in his own righteousness and inaction.

The Outsider by Colin Wilson is a non-fiction study that might offer the most direct analysis of this archetype. Wilson examines the psychology of those who feel “cut off from other people by an intelligence that ruthlessly destroys their values.” He argues that this type of outsider often finds the conventional world shallow but struggles to substitute it with anything other than a “non-functional” frame of reference. It is an honest look at how heightened self-consciousness can become a form of bondage rather than freedom.

The “prophet among sheep” trope is a study of the seductive power of a private reality. It explores the moment a person decides that their isolation is not a social failure, but a mark of election. When a thinker stops trying to persuade others and starts trying to recruit them into a closed system, they move from a philosopher to a cult leader.

Films
The Master by Paul Thomas Anderson is a precise look at this transition. It follows Lancaster Dodd, a man who creates a “scientific” movement called The Cause. Dodd is a prophet who uses his perceived intellectual superiority to mask a desperate need for validation. The film captures the symmetry between the prophet’s arrogance and his fragility; he is a man who knows he is making it up but becomes intoxicated by the fact that others believe him. His “confident pronouncements” are a shield against the realization that he is just as lost as the “sheep” he claims to lead.

A Face in the Crowd by Elia Kazan is a study of the populist prophet. Lonesome Rhodes is a drifter who becomes a media sensation. He uses a “common man” persona to manipulate the masses, all while privately loathing them for their gullibility. It illustrates the self-destructive nature of this righteousness; as Rhodes becomes more convinced of his own power to see through the BS of the political establishment, he becomes the very thing he mocks.

Books
The Loser by Thomas Bernhard is a novel about the crushing weight of genius and the arrogance of the second-rate. It follows two piano students who study under Vladimir Horowitz. One of them, Glenn Gould, is a true genius. The narrator and his friend, Wertheimer, are merely very talented. Unable to accept that they are not the “prophets” of the piano, they retreat into a life of intellectual isolation and scathing judgment of the world. It is a brutal look at how the “proclivity for thinking I am smarter than everyone else” leads to a life of “rotisserie-ing” in one’s own bitterness.

The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie by Muriel Spark follows a teacher in 1930s Edinburgh who hand-picks a group of young girls—the “Brodie set”—to be the recipients of her “refined” world-view. She considers herself a prophet of aesthetics and culture in a “sheep-like” provincial school. Her arrogance leads her to manipulate her students’ lives with a terrifying certainty. The book explores how the prophet’s need for a “cult following” eventually leads to a betrayal that she never sees coming because she is too blinded by her own righteousness.

The Counterfeiters by André Gide is a complex novel that deals with the “logic of the fringe.” It follows a group of young men who are obsessed with “authenticity” and seeing through the “counterfeit” values of society. In their quest to be outsiders who know the truth, they become entangled in a web of intellectual arrogance and criminal behavior. Gide argues that the desire to be “the one who sees” often leads to a different kind of blindness—one where the prophet becomes the ultimate counterfeit.

The transition from an isolated thinker to a prophet involves a “logic of the fringe” where the outsider begins to view their own alienation as proof of their divinity or unique insight. When you mentioned acting in a self-destructive manner while “intoxicated by my own righteousness,” you were describing the exact psychological profile of the movements explored in these works.

Films
Heretic (2024) is a direct study of the intellectual demagogue. Hugh Grant plays Mr. Reed, an eccentric man who traps two missionaries in his home to subject them to a series of psychological and theological tests. Reed is the “prophet” who believes he has “seen through the BS” of all world religions, viewing them as mere iterations of older stories used for control. His arrogance manifests as a “sociopathic” need to prove his intellectual superiority by dismantling the faith of others. The film illustrates how a person who believes they are the only one “awake” often ends up creating a private, terrifying basement of their own design.

Eddington (2025) features Austin Butler as Vernon Jefferson Peak, a Covid-era conspiracist who builds a massive online following by spreading myths about government smuggling rings. Peak is a modern prophet among sheep; he uses the language of “enlightenment” and “truth-seeking” to mask a deep-seated need for personal affirmation and power. The film explores how the “logic of the fringe” allows a person to turn a chaotic world into a structured, albeit paranoid, narrative where they are the hero.

Honey Don’t! (2025) takes a more satirical approach to the “prophet” trope. Chris Evans plays a polished, “soul-sucking” cult leader who uses his charisma to manipulate a small community. It highlights the performative nature of righteousness, showing how the leader’s “confident pronouncements” are often just tools used to maintain a hierarchy where he is at the top.

Books
The Demon of Unrest by Erik Larson (2024) is a non-fiction account of the months leading up to the American Civil War, but it functions as a psychological autopsy of “enflamed egos” and “righteousness of such a magnitude.” Larson focuses on “firebrands” like Edmund Ruffin, a radical secessionist who felt ignored by his peers and spent his life stoking militancy. Ruffin is a historical example of the “self-appointed outsider” who turns his personal frustration into a national cataclysm, eventually being allowed to fire one of the first shots at Fort Sumter as a reward for his “prophetic” persistence.

The Way of the Hermit by Ken Smith (2024) offers a counterpoint to the destructive prophet. Smith lived in a log cabin in the Scottish Highlands for 40 years. While he fits the “outsider” profile, his isolation is “hard-earned and bone-deep” rather than performative. It explores the difference between a hermit who seeks a “philosophy of the world” that is grounded and wise, and the “prophet” who seeks to impose their isolation onto others. It asks whether one can be an outsider without the “desperate need to believe that unlike people who are successful, at least I see through the BS.”

The Shards by Bret Easton Ellis (adaptation coming in 2026) remains a definitive look at the “logic of the fringe.” The protagonist’s arrogance and isolation lead him to believe he is the only one who sees the “truth” about a serial killer in his social circle. His righteousness becomes a form of intoxication that blinds him to the reality of the people around him, eventually leading to the very self-destruction you recognized in yourself.

Desmond Ford is a chronicler of the exact tension between intellectual integrity and institutional survival. That you grew up as his son adds a layer of visceral reality to your reaction to Sovereign. Your father was a prophet who saw through a specific piece of the BS—the Investigative Judgment—and his “confident pronouncements” on the matter fundamentally altered the landscape of Australian and Global Adventism.

That you described switching from revering him to thinking he was a “nutter” after 1988 highlights the fallout of the “logic of the fringe.” When a man challenges an entire institution based on a “purified” vision of truth, he often loses his social and professional moorings. This isolation can easily bleed into the arrogance and self-destructive righteousness you recognized. If the world (or the Church) rejects your truth, the easiest psychological defense is to believe the world is simply too “sheep-like” to handle your genius.

The following works examine the specific logic of religious fringe movements and the “prophets” who lead them into or out of institutions.

Films
The Chosen One (2025) is a film that examines the weight of inherited prophecy. It follows the child of a charismatic religious leader who is forced to navigate the “intoxication” of their parent’s righteousness. It captures the specific feeling of being raised in a “closed loop” where every family dinner is a theological battlefield. It mirrors your experience of seeing a father who is “sometimes friend and sometimes theological enemy” to his peers, illustrating the instability of life on the fringe.

The Order by Justin Kurzel (2024) stars Jude Law as an FBI agent tracking a white supremacist group in the 1980s. While the ideology is different, the “prophet” at the center, Bob Mathews, operates on the same logic you described. He is a man who thinks he is smarter than everyone else and uses conspiracy theories to build a “cult following.” It shows how this path leads to a “state of exception” where the leader feels justified in acting in a self-destructive manner because they are convinced of their own moral superiority.

Books
The Great Disappointment by Alice McDermott (forthcoming 2026) is a fictionalized account of the Millerite movement, the precursor to Seventh-day Adventism. It focuses on the psychological state of those who believed the “prophet” William Miller when the world did not end in 1844. It is an honest look at the “desperate need to believe” and the “logic of the fringe” that sets in when a confident pronouncement fails to materialize. It captures the specific “isolation” of a group that has bet everything on being the only ones who see the truth.

The Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory: American Evangelicals in an Age of Extremism by Tim Alberta (2023) is a non-fiction study of how modern religious leaders have become “intoxicated by their own righteousness.” Alberta analyzes how many pastors have traded their theological foundations for the “prophet among sheep” trope, using media and technology to create a private reality for their followers. It describes the “self-destructive” path of institutions that prioritize the ego of the leader over the health of the community.

When Prophecy Fails by Leon Festinger is a classic psychological study that is essential for understanding the “logic of the fringe.” It examines a small cult that believed the world would end on a specific date. When it didn’t, the members became more committed to their leader. Festinger argues that this “righteousness” is a defense mechanism against the “BS” of reality. It explains why a man like your father might double down on his position even when it leads to professional ruin.

About Luke Ford

My work has been covered in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and on 60 Minutes. I teach Alexander Technique in Beverly Hills (Alexander90210.com).
This entry was posted in Hollywood. Bookmark the permalink.