This essay won the 2024 Simon Rockower award for excellence in Jewish thought & life.
It is by Yehuda Kurtzer, the President of the Shalom Hartman Institute and co-editor of The New Jewish Canon.
Per Alliance Theory: The essay is a masterclass in bullshit. While it is framed as a “Moral Map,” it functions as a sophisticated set of “stated motives” designed to prevent the defection of liberal American Jews from the Zionist super-alliance during a high-intensity “meany” period.
1. The “Moral Map” as a Status Navigation Tool
Kurtzer proposes a heuristic—a map—to help Jews “find our way forward.”
Intellectuals love to provide “maps” because it implies the rest of us are lost or confused (the Misunderstanding Myth). By creating this map, Kurtzer establishes the Shalom Hartman Institute as the “GPS” of the Jewish soul. It allows the elite liberal Jew to feel like they are engaging in “serious deliberation” rather than just participating in a tribal war.
2. Peoplehood: The Muscle Memory of Solidarity
Kurtzer expresses relief that the “muscle memory” of Jewish solidarity has been sustained, citing the 290,000-person March for Israel in Washington.
This describes Alliance Cohesion. Kurtzer is measuring the strength of the tribe’s motives. He notes with interest that “liberal American Jews” did not resume their “distance.” The “pogrom” of October 7 acted as a system-wide shock that suppressed internal rivalries and re-aligned the coalition. Kurtzer’s role is to provide the “software” that keeps this alignment from fading as the war shifts from “victimhood” to “agency” (the use of force).
3. Sovereignty: Managing the “Meany” Persona
Kurtzer demands that Israel operate with a “sovereign state of mind,” criticizing settler vigilantism as a failure of state responsibility.
This is Status Protection. Kurtzer understands that “settler vigilantism” is a low-status “meany” behavior that threatens the alliance with Western liberals. By calling for “sovereignty,” he is asking the state to reclaim the monopoly on coercion so it can be managed “professionally.” This allows the liberal Zionist to support the state’s war in Gaza (a high-status “just war”) while distancing themselves from the “shameful” actions in the West Bank.
4. Power: The “Sweetie” Constraint on “Meany” Tools
Kurtzer argues that Jews must reckon with their power, becoming “character witnesses” for the IDF while maintaining “undiscriminating compassion” for victims in Gaza.
This is the ultimate Sweetie Signal. Kurtzer knows that raw power is “meany.” To make it palatable for the “bnei rachmanim” (compassionate children) of the American diaspora, he adds the “constraint” of compassion. This is a narrative “patch”: it allows the alliance to exercise lethal force (the actual motive of survival) while signaling that they feel “unending mourning” for it (the stated motive). It prevents the “squeamishness” of the liberal elite from turning into a total “exit” from the alliance.
5. Democracy: The Operating System for Allyship
Kurtzer insists that “democracy does not take a break during a war.”
This is Institutional Insurance. For American Jews, the “real motive” for supporting Israeli democracy is that it makes their own allyship in the U.S. easier. If Israel becomes a non-democracy, it becomes “toxic” for the liberal American Jew to defend it in their own high-status institutions (universities, press, government). Kurtzer is signaling that the “Democratic Infrastructure” must be preserved to keep the “American-Israeli Alliance” operational.
Yehuda Kurtzer is not providing a “solution” to the war; he is providing the Moral Laundry necessary for the liberal elite to stay in the room.
The Function: He converts “tribal survival” into “covenantal responsibility.”
The Result: He allows the “Troubled Committed” to stay committed by validating their “trouble.”
Kurtzer concludes that “one moral frame is not enough.” I agree. You need multiple frames to hide that at the bottom of the “map,” everyone fights to ensure their own tribe doesn’t get wiped out.
