The Top Ten Money-Making But Unnecessary Procedures Pushed By Dentists

Gemini says: In dentistry, the shift toward a business-heavy model has led to a rise in overtreatment, where the Professional Managerial Class (PMC) of dental office managers and corporate owners pressures clinicians to meet production quotas. This turns the “watch and wait” philosophy of traditional dentistry into an “identify and intervene” ritual that maximizes billable events.

The following list identifies ten procedures frequently used to generate revenue, often at the expense of a patient’s natural tooth structure.

The Dental Hall of Shame: 10 Revenue-Driven Rituals

Aggressive Deep Cleanings (Scaling and Root Planing)

Routine cleanings are often “upsold” to deep cleanings if a hygienist finds any pocket depth over 3mm. While vital for active periodontitis, many offices mandate this high-cost procedure for mild gingivitis that would resolve with better flossing. It is a major profit center because it is billed per “quadrant” of the mouth.

Replacement of “Aging” Silver (Amalgam) Fillings

Dentists often suggest replacing old silver fillings with tooth-colored composite, claiming the silver is “leaking” or “toxic.” If the filling is functional and intact, drilling it out unnecessarily weakens the tooth’s structural integrity and starts a “cycle of replacement” that eventually leads to a crown.

Prophylactic Wisdom Tooth Extraction

The removal of wisdom teeth that are not causing pain, crowding, or infection is a rite of passage that generates billions. While some extractions prevent future problems, many are performed simply because the “window of opportunity” (and insurance coverage) is open.

Adult Dental Sealants

Sealants are excellent for children’s new molars, but some offices push them on adults with established, healthy teeth. In adults, sealants can sometimes “trap” existing microscopic decay underneath the plastic coating, leading to a massive cavity that goes undetected until it reaches the nerve.

“Incipient” Cavity Drilling

Modern dentistry allows for the “remineralization” of tiny, surface-level cavities (incipient lesions) using high-fluoride pastes. However, many dentists prefer to “drill and fill” these spots immediately. Once a tooth is drilled, it is permanently compromised and will likely require larger fillings every 10–15 years.

Full-Coverage Crowns Instead of Onlays

When a tooth has a large cavity, a “conservative” dentist might use an onlay to save the healthy cusps. A “production” dentist often jumps straight to a full crown because it is faster to prep, easier to bill, and justifies the cost of an in-office milling machine (CEREC).

Night Guards for “Suspected” Grinding

While vital for true bruxism, custom night guards (often costing $500–$800) are frequently recommended based on minor wear facets that may be years old. It is an easy, high-margin product with zero surgical risk for the dentist.

Cosmetic Veneers Marketed as “Necessary”

Veneers require the permanent removal of healthy enamel. Offices often frame these as “reconstructive” to help patients justify the cost, even when a simple course of whitening and minor bonding would achieve the same aesthetic goal without destroying the teeth.

Excessive 3D Imaging (CBCT Scans)

Digital X-rays are standard, but some clinics push expensive 3D Cone Beam scans for routine checkups or simple extractions. While helpful for complex implants, using them as a “screening tool” increases patient radiation exposure and adds a high “technology fee” to the bill.

Routine Fluoride “Varnish” for Low-Risk Adults

Many offices apply a fluoride varnish to every patient at the end of a cleaning. For adults with no history of recent cavities and a healthy diet, this $30–$50 add-on provides almost no clinical benefit but adds a significant, effortless “bump” to the day’s revenue.

The Mechanism of the “Dental Scam”

These procedures persist because of Information Asymmetry. A patient cannot see the “shadow” on the X-ray that the dentist claims is a cavity. By framing every minor observation as a “finding” that requires “intervention,” the dentist satisfies the bureaucratic demand for growth. The ritual isn’t just about money; it’s about the dentist’s status as a “proactive” healthcare provider rather than a passive observer of natural aging.

About Luke Ford

I teach Alexander Technique in Beverly Hills (Alexander90210.com).
This entry was posted in Dentistry. Bookmark the permalink.