Police shot smoke rounds while protesters shut down I-94 in St. Paul tonight #PhilandoCastile #I94closed pic.twitter.com/sZLtAfqO0a
— Andy Rathbun (@andyrathbun) July 10, 2016
EXCLUSIVE ANALYSIS: Blacks and Latinos have committed 89.4 percent of mass shootings to date in 2016 pic.twitter.com/CzOOVr3qxH
— Ricky Vaughn (@Ricky_Vaughn99) July 9, 2016
* The article about the black motorist killed in Minnesota has a good illustration of differing white and NAM views on crime, and why Trump’s path to victory is on this issue more than any other, including immigration.
He was pulled over 3 to 4 times per year for the past 13 years, again and again, for driving without a driver’s license, driving without car insurance, and not having a muffler.
For the most part, NAM communities don’t think there is much wrong with driving without insurance. They regard the laws and requirements for responsible driving as annoyances and oppression by white culture.
So as America browns, this is going to be an increasing source of conflict.
As an example, in exurban San Diego County, nearly all police stops for driving without insurance were of NAMs, so courts forced the local governments to stop doing no-insurance checks a few years ago.
As badly as Trump is doing running his campaign, Hillary is running on a David Dinkins platform that the real problem here is white racism and police misconduct. If she keeps it up, she could end losing the vote of a large number of white Democrats. It is also probably inevitable that there will be one or more BLM disruptions of her events as well as her VP choice. When it happened to Sanders, it was probably the single worst moment of his campaign. She’ll look weak letting it happen, and then she’ll look worse meekly agreeing with everything they said.
* Police will, I suspect, work out ways to minimize the casualties even from kamikaze ambush attacks, but it will further militarize law enforcement. Certain situations may be deemed too dangerous to send in human officers even before shots have been fired. Reconnaissance by drone or robotic vehicle will precede police intervention in many sections of black or other dangerous neighborhoods. Human intervention will resemble small versions of the Normandy invasion. Demonstrations such as the one in Dallas will either be banned entirely, or will permitted only after sweeps of buildings along the march route.
* One thing Trump should do is replay, with relevant revision, a classic line of Reagan’s. Reagan asked, in his campaign against Carter, “Are you better or worse off than before?”
Trump should ask the question: “We hear Hillary and the Democrats talk about improving race relations. But after 8 years of a Democratic President, are race relations better or worse off than before? Hillary has gone on record promising the same policies and approach. Do you think that after four more years of the same, race relations will be better or worse off?”
* Speaking of cities of hate, Chappaqua NY, home of the Clintons, very wealthy, has been forced to accept low income (diverse) housing. The residents (who I assume are liberal) tried to block it for years with various legal maneuvers but failed ultimately. Is Chappaqua a City of Hate or will they never be a City of Hate, immunized by Hillary ? Will they be a City of Hate if the children living in the low income housing cannot keep up with the children in the heavily Jewish and Asian public school system? Will they be a City of hate if a resident of the low income housing gets in trouble with the police?
* White Dems may not be very aware of what the BLM people are doing if liberal networks are trying to hide the activity, but they’ll learn tomorrow or the day after when their commutes are disrupted by all the protesters blocking major routes. Unlike the BLM and various other Soros hirelings, most white Dems have a job.
The suburbs around the major cities of the US have the largest concentration of white Dems that you can find anywhere. Since white Dems also live a long distance away from their jobs in the city (having been forced out by violent blacks), they have a long way to drive to get to work, and they’ll be ticked off by the disruption. A lot of white liberals are happy to support blacks–until they become a target themselves. At that point, they start considering a voting alternative.
Hillary’s coddling of the BLM isn’t going to make her popular with the remaining white liberals. Many of them had already drifted away to support Bernie, and they view her as the party’s illegitimate candidate, having gained her position via special delegates alone. I can see Gary Johnson or whoever else is pro-pot getting a lot of extra votes from angry Bernie supporters. Hillary needs these voters desperately, and she can’t afford to lose them or she’ll lose the election.
The BLM people really have no common sense. They’re going to be targeting their own mealy-mouthed libtard supporters, and these are people whose backing they really need; otherwise they’d be going nowhere.
