LAT: ‘Cops’ creator John Langley dies during road race in Mexico

From the New York Times June 29, 2021: “In the Academy interview four years earlier, Mr. Langley addressed criticism about race in “Cops” by saying that while 60 to 70 percent of street crime was “caused by people of color,” he had made sure that most of the criminals seen on the show were white, to avoid “negative stereotyping,” he said, and because most of the show’s audience was white.”

From the Los Angeles Times, June 27, 2021:

John Langley creator of the long-running TV series “Cops,” has died during a road race in Mexico, a family spokeswoman said.

Langley died in Baja, Mexico, of an apparent heart attack Saturday during the Coast to Coast Ensenada-San Felipe 250 off-road race, family spokeswoman Pam Golum said. He was 78.

“Cops” was among the first reality series on the air when it debuted in 1989, and it would become an institution through 32 seasons. Langley and production partner Malcolm Barbour had shopped the idea for years, and found a home for it on the fledgling Fox network.

The show was famous for following police, including deputies in the Deep South and officers from big city police departments, on long, boring nights in patrol cars or in fevered foot chases.

Its quirks, including its often shirtless suspects and its reggae theme song “Bad Boys,” were frequent fodder for standup comics and were often referenced in films, TV shows and songs.

It ran on Fox until 2013, when Viacom-owned Spike TV, later re-branded as the Paramount Network, picked it up.

It came under criticism for what was considered a slanted, pro-police perspective, and was permanently pulled from the air by Paramount last year during worldwide protests over the killing of George Floyd.

I interviewed John Langley around August 9, 2002:

Producer John Langley is a man’s man. He doesn’t seem to mind much what people think of him. He’s a refreshing change from many of the prissy image-conscious producers I’ve interviewed.

Langley owns a huge production facility on Colorado Avenue in Santa Monica. His parking lot is filled with about 40 vehicles.

I believe I was here once before – about eight years ago. In my days as a struggling actor, I participated in a talkshow pilot but the producers pulled me off the show because I was over the top obnoxious.

As I walk down the hallway to John’s office, a blonde woman (who turns out to be his wife of 30 years, Maggie) warns me, ‘If you’re not a smoker, throw your arms up in the air and say you can’t do the interview here. And he’ll take you upstairs.’

I walk into the office, which turns out to be a largely empty stage. I look around and crane my head to the left where I find John, a tall strapping man almost 60 years of age, smoking a smelly cigar.

He asks me if I mind the cigar and I say I don’t, but sure it would be nice to do the interview upstairs, after he takes me on a tour of the facilities.

We walk into an editing bay and it looks like the guy is cutting homosexual porn, but it’s just the TV show Cops, Langley’s most famous production. It debuted in 1989 on Fox, and is about to air its 500th episode.

John and I settle down on adjacent couches in an empty upstairs office. We put our feet up on the table and whinge about lawyers.

Luke: “My sister is a barrister in Australia.”

John: “Well, a barrister is not like a US lawyer.”

Luke: “Barristers have to wear a wig.”

John: “It’s more noble.”

Luke: “There are so many more lawyers here. Yanks are so litigious.”

John: “I was never in a lawsuit in my life until I got into this business, where it is almost inevitable.”

Luke: “People will sue each other and then do business the next day.”

John: “Absolutely.”

Luke: “I would never sue anyone unless it was just over the top. It’s not honorable.”

John: “I wish we had the English [legal] system where loser pays. As long as you don’t have that system, you are going to have a lot of litigious people suing just so they can get an insurance settlement.”

Luke: “Where did you grow up?”

John: “West Los Angeles and Manhattan Beach. My father worked in the aircraft industry. My mother was a housewife. I have two older brothers and a younger sister. None of them are in entertainment.

“I was born June 1, 1944. At one time, I wanted to be an academic. I’ve always been a slow learner. At age 18, in 1961, I joined the Army. I didn’t want to go to college right away. I figured this was a great way to see the world and get laid.

“I went into so-called Army Intelligence. I spent two years, nine months, 29 days, 13 hours, 22 minutes and 14 seconds.”

Luke: “Did you being in Army Intelligence help you get laid?”

John: “Oh sure. I was in Panama for two years. Then I returned home, went back to school, piddled around, worked multiple jobs, and returned to school. I got my BA (English) and MA (Literature/Composition) from Cal State Dominguez and I did PhD work at UC Irvine in the philosophy of aesthetics. It was a movement at the time. I taught at those two schools and I thought I wanted to be a professor.

“In 1971, I finally said enough of this nonsense. I quit because I couldn’t conceive of teaching the same courses year in and year out. I’m a Gemini. I need more stimulation. I loved academia and I loved literature but I burned out on Ivory Tower capitalism.

“I got married and worked for an airline for three years in public relations. It was a great gig but I made no money. I traveled the world. I’ve always been a writer. I published in Film News International. Someone (Steve Friedman) read a screenplay I’d written and asked me to help produce a movie (The Crowley Testament) for Warner Brothers. So I quit my job in 1977. It was a theatrical fictional documentary about a mad scientist named Lucius Crowley.

“Then the guy who bought the project for Warners was fired and the new guy who came in, Robert Shapiro, threw out all the old projects.

“Then I worked for the marketing firm, Producers Creative Services (PCS) , of my future partner Malcom Barber. In 1980, we sold PCs and started a production company. We starved for a couple of years and then we did a documentary about drug addiction called Cocaine Blues.”

Luke: “Was this based on personal experience?”

John: “Oh, there’s been a bit of that. Maybe it was my karmic debt. We had a film deal with somebody and they said, ‘Do something small first just to show that you can do what you say you can do.’ So we did Cocaine Blues, which had been developed for somebody else. In my naivete, I realized that making a film was one thing but selling it was another.

“We entered it in all the film festivals and won some awards. And that’s how I got into television [and conceived the show Cops].

“I wrote a screenplay that sold years later. Then in 1987, I made the Dolph Lundgren: Maximum Potential exercise video. I hired Quentin Tarantino and Roger Avary as PAs. Quentin and Roger worked at Video Archives in Manhattan Beach, where I live. They were kids, 18-19 years old. We used to discuss film and BS. I loaned him my script for the [1986] film Behind Enemy Lines. He showed me scripts he’d written.

“As a PA, Quentin was always bashing into nightstands and babbling everybody. He’s quite a talker and loves to get into debates about film. My partner would say, ‘Fire that kid. He doesn’t know what the hell he’s doing.’

“Roger came to me once and asked, ‘I want to be a director. I don’t want to be a PA. How do I do that?’ I said, ‘Roger, if you want to be a director, direct. If you want to be a writer, write. If you want to be a producer, produce.’ He thought about it and said ok. The next day he came in and said, ‘I quit.’ I said, ‘That’s cool. What are you going to do?’ He said, ‘I’m going to be a writer and a director.'”

According to Imdb.com: Roger Avary “met Quentin Tarantino at a video store they both worked at in the 1980’s. Though Quentin Tarantino received credit, it was actually Avary who conceived the Top-Gun gay reference speech that Tarantino used in Sleep with Me (1994). Avary’s writing contributions to Pulp Fiction (1994) include: 1) A boxer who refuses to throw a fight. 2) A pair of hitmen who accidentally shoot a hostage in the head in the back of a car. (Actually a deleted script idea from True Romance (1993). 3) A boxer who tells his wife they are in danger, and must leave the country.”

Roger says about Quentin: “I’ve realised that I can’t hang out with him. I talk with him, and he just sucks stuff from me.”

John: “Quentin finished out as PA on that project, picking up dog turds on Venice Beach and that kind of work. That was their intro to the film biz.

“I produced about eight two-hour Geraldo Rivera primetime television specials. One, called American Vice, featured a live drug bust. One lady sued Gerald because during the live broadcast he said, ‘A lady and her pimp are being…’ She claimed she just happened to be at that guy’s house.

“I was trying to sell Cops at the time. I went to Tribune with it. Back on Cocaine Blues, I accompanied cops on a drug bust. I said, ‘Wow, this is interesting.’ I thought it would be great to do a show with no narrator and no script, from a cop’s point of view. Because it is interesting work. Nobody would buy it.

“Tribune said, ‘We’ll do something with you if you do it with Geraldo.’ I said no, I wanted to do Cops. They said, ‘Well, it’s Geraldo or nothing.’ So I thought about it and said, OK, we’ll meet.’ And then we put together a two-hour special, American Vice, about the drug war.”

Luke: “Did you do the one where he opened Al Capone’s vault?”

John: “No, that was the first one he did. And I think he was chagrined by it because it was a big bust. There was nothing there. Our promise to him was, ‘We’ll guarantee you that your vault won’t be empty. We’ll have all this action and all this investigative look at drugs. We’ll put you undercover and get all this clandestine tape of drug deals. We’ll do live drug busts.’

“The guy at Tribune said, ‘Are you sure we can do that live?’ I said, ‘Of course we can.’ I didn’t have the slightest idea how to do it. We researched it and found technicians who told us how we could do it. We used microwave technology and bounced signals up to helicopters who’d bounce it back down to trucks who’d bounce it up to satellites.”

Luke: “What are people telling you while you try to shop Cops?”

John: “We’ll never do this kind of show. It will be a nightmare legally. You can’t do a show without a host and narrator. You can’t do a show without actors and a script. I had blinders on and I refused to listen to all the rejections. All the networks rejected it. The irony is that once it was picked up by Fox and succeeded, every network wanted to do the same show. All the networks called me back to see if I would do a cop show with them.”

Luke: “How did you finally get Cops on the air?”

John: “Timing. I met with Steve Chao at Fox. His mandate was to do alternative interesting programming. I kept pitching him shows and he rejected all the shows. Finally, I said, ‘You wouldn’t know a good show if it slapped you in the face. Fuck off. I don’t want to talk to you anymore.’ And that excited him. ‘No, no, no. One last pitch. Pick one idea that you really like.’

“We’d pitched four ideas: 1- 911, which became Rescue 911. 2 – Most Wanted. 3. Funny home videos. 4. Cops.

“Then he said, ‘Which one of those do you want to do the most?’ And I said Cops. He said fine. We met with Barry Diller. Fox initially ordered 45 episodes a year. We cut back to 36 so that we could have a life. We’re in our 15th season now.”

Luke: “Did that Supreme Court media tag along ruling affect you?”

John: “No. There’s a big misunderstanding about it. The Supreme Court ruled that if somebody accompanies the police on to private property, they are subject to being sued by whoever owns the private company. The case came about because CBS News had accompanied the police on a raid.

“It’s an interesting constitutional issue pitting the Fourth Amendment (against unreasonable search and seizure) and the First Amendment (free speech).

“The ruling got misinterpreted in the media as no more ride-alongs, which is nonsense. For Cops, we always get permission from everybody anyway so it doesn’t matter. We have far more strictures than the news. They can show everything they want.”

Luke: “Why do people sign releases to be on your show?”

John: “Fame.”

Luke: “If you were arrested, would you sign a release?”

John: “Of course I would. I’ve told my children the same. Cops has become part of the pop culture. People who will yell, ‘Get that news camera away from me.’ But when they hear that it is cops, they go, ‘Oh, that’s cool.’ And they sign releases. You tell me why. I don’t know why. Maybe it’s because it is part of the landscape now. It’s cool to be on Cops.”

Luke: “You had that producer who was arrested for drunk driving.”

John: “Yes. He was cashiered from his position because of that. He’s no longer allowed to go into the field. He’s in a purely editorial capacity now.”

Luke: “Your wife works with you.”

John: “Now that the kids are raised, she’s become more active. We’ve produced a couple of films together.

“A few years ago, I started a website Crime.com with the sole purpose of reverse convergence. Right in the middle of the dot com madness, as bubbles are bursting all over, I started an internet company called Crime.com. It was everything you ever wanted to know about crime – information, news, entertainment… I wanted to turn it into a channel. I ended up selling it to USA Networks and being a cofounder of the cable channel, which has yet to launch. And also being responsible for all the original programming.”

Luke: “What’s your reaction to reality programming like Survivor?”

John: “I see it as reality-based gameshows. It’s a distinct genre, apart from reality programming.

“The media need labels. They need categorical imperatives.”

Luke: “What shows have you been working on?”

John: “Not much. I’m picky. I doubt that in television I will ever succeed the impact of Cops. It’s the best idea I’ve had for television entertainment.”

Luke: “Have you had to tone down the violence on Cops?”

John: “No. The interesting thing about television is that you can show all the blood and guts you want. You just have to avoid sex and language. I’ve had some interesting discussions with Standards and Practices [internal network censorship units] over the years. For instance, you can’t say ‘Jesus Christ’ or ‘God damn it’ on television. Yet I can show homicide. To me, a murder is far more obscene than language. I always try to push the envelope as far as possible. Not to exploit, but to be as real and as raw as possible because that’s the programming mandate for the show. I wanted to show you reality as you have never seen it. You what to show what a homicide scene is and what a high speed chase is. My purpose is not to show blood and guts. I just want to show reality as unvarnished as possible. Cops is an existential variety show. It is unpredictable and immediate and as real as you can get without being there.

“Often there’s a confusion between the message and the messenger. I am not a cop and I have never had ambitions to be a cop. I’m a child of the ’60s. If you would’ve told me that I was going to do a show about cops, I would’ve said, ‘What am I going to call it? Pigs?’ I just happened to get in an arena that was dramatic and started doing documentary films about it that became so-called reality television. And in doing it, I developed respect for people doing it, like cops, paramedics, firemen. Most of these people are in it for pro-social purposes. By and large, these guys are the good guys.

“When something like 9/11 happens, there’s a great urge for order.”

Luke: “What did you think of the Bush administration’s overtures to Hollywood to play a part in the war on terrorism?”

John: “Deplorable. I am not big on propaganda. The best form of propaganda is an informed populace.”

Luke: “Why have you chosen to specialize in crime?”

John: “Why do I do Cops and not Accountants? Certain professions lend themselves to drama. That’s why there are so many medical, legal and crime dramas.”

Posted in Police, Reality Shows, TV | Comments Off on LAT: ‘Cops’ creator John Langley dies during road race in Mexico

Earn What You Deserve: How to Stop Underearning & Start Thriving (6-27-21)

00:00 Earn What You Deserve: How to Stop Underearning & Start Thriving, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140174
01:00 Unmanageability indicates you might have an addiction
02:00 How Luke realized he was an underearner
05:30 How Richard realized he was an underearner
06:00 Debtors Anonymous, https://debtorsanonymous.org/
07:00 Underearners Anonymous, https://www.underearnersanonymous.org/
08:00 Financial Underearners Anonymous, https://www.financialunderearnersanonymous.org/
33:00 “Underearners evade, avoid, and deflect money like running backs hurtling toward the goal line of poverty”
47:00 Christianity and Judaism’s attitudes towards poverty
52:00 Developing a healthy relationship with reality
57:00 Anonymity is the spiritual foundation of all our Traditions – what does this mean?
1:00:00 How long do you stay in a 12-step program?
1:13:00 We admitted we were powerless
1:34:50 The Ring of Gyges: Morality and Hypocrisy, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xTGc1Pyp-Jc
1:40:00 Does the Job of Talk-Show Sidekick Even Make Sense Anymore?, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/23/arts/television/talk-show-sidekick.html
1:45:30 Howard Stern on The Magic Hour (1998-07-02), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=itoVwN-sxNY
1:47:30 Craig Shoemaker on the Magic Hour- Jim Norton & Sam Roberts, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LRR0sUO-a0
1:54:00 Howard Stern TV Magic Johnson & Gilbert Gottfried Make An Appearance, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei_rMtOSiqY

Posted in Addiction | Comments Off on Earn What You Deserve: How to Stop Underearning & Start Thriving (6-27-21)

The Fisher Wallace Stimulator

I’ve been using this device since 2014. It zaps away my underlying depression and anxiety and also helps with my sleep. One friend said to me a couple of weeks into my treatment, “Why are you smiling all the time?”

David Levine writes in Scientific American in 2016:

I have been using the Fisher Wallace Stimulator, a portable, battery-powered generator permitted by the FDA for symptomatic relief of insomnia, anxiety and depression, and for treating chronic pain (although the agency recently proposed imposing new restrictions on such devices). It is a  cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) device which stimulates the brain to produce serotonin and other neurochemicals. It is designed to be used for 20 minutes twice a day and may be used with or without medication in consultation with your doctor.

For me, the best part is that unlike ECT, TMS or other therapies, the Fisher Wallace Stimulator can be used at home and there is no risk of seizures. Your doctor has to prescribe it and you can buy the device on the company website for $699 (there is a $100 discount for Medicare, Medicaid, Veteran and First Responder Families) but can return it for a full discount if it doesn’t work within 30 days. Some insurance plans will pay for the device when it is prescribed for chronic pain. Mine did.

The Fisher Wallace Stimulator been shown effective in many studies including one in the Journal of Affective Disorders. The results of a pilot study for the treatment of bipolar disorder was published last year.

I have been using the Fisher Wallace Stimulator for about six years to help with my anxiety and chronic pain. I occasionally use it for insomnia as well. When I travel to a different time zone, I find it helpful with jet lag, although it is not one of the conditions it was set out to treat. I find it relaxing. I don’t feel like I am "shocking my brain," and it reminds me of how I felt when I practiced transcendental meditation in college.

Posted in Depression | Comments Off on The Fisher Wallace Stimulator

Craig Shoemaker on the Magic Hour

Posted in Comedy | Comments Off on Craig Shoemaker on the Magic Hour

Hungarian Jews protest law against sharing content on homosexuality with minors

I don’t recall the Jewish tradition promoting the sharing of homosexual materials with children.

From the Times of Israel:

Largest federation of Jewish communities in country criticizes ‘gay propaganda law,’ saying no one should be discriminated against or outlawed because of their identity.

JTA — Jewish groups in Hungary have condemned a new law in the country that forbids sharing content on homosexuality with minors.

Called the “gay propaganda law,” the legislation passed last week in parliament follows similar moves in Russia in 2013 that define written or visual materials pertaining to sex reassignment or homosexuality as propaganda that should not be allowed to reach children.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Hungarian Jews protest law against sharing content on homosexuality with minors

Bill Barr Realized Quickly That Trump’s Claims About Voter Fraud Were BS

From The Atlantic:

* …Barr told me he had already concluded that it was highly unlikely that evidence existed that would tip the scales in the election. He had expected Trump to lose and therefore was not surprised by the outcome. He also knew that at some point, Trump was going to confront him about the allegations, and he wanted to be able to say that he had looked into them and that they were unfounded. So, in addition to giving prosecutors approval to open investigations into clear and credible allegations of substantial fraud, Barr began his own, unofficial inquiry into the major claims that the president and his allies were making.

“My attitude was: It was put-up or shut-up time,” Barr told me. “If there was evidence of fraud, I had no motive to suppress it. But my suspicion all the way along was that there was nothing there. It was all bullshit.”

The Department of Justice ended up conducting no formal investigations of voter fraud, but as part of Barr’s informal review, he asked the U.S. Attorney in Michigan about Trump’s claim that mysterious “ballot dumps” in Detroit had secured Biden’s victory in the state.

As proof of fraud, Trump’s allies had pointed to videos showing boxes filled with ballots arriving at the TCF Center, in Detroit, to be counted after the 8 p.m. deadline for votes to be cast. But Barr quickly found that there was a logical explanation. It had to do with how the 662 precincts in Wayne County, home to Detroit, tabulate their votes. “In every other county, they count the ballots at the precinct, but in Wayne County, they bring them into one central counting place. So the boxes are coming in all night. The fact that boxes are coming in—well, that’s what they do.”

Furthermore, Trump performed better against Biden in Detroit than he had against Hillary Clinton in 2016. Biden received 1,000 fewer votes in Detroit than Clinton had, and Trump received 5,000 more votes than he had four years earlier. Trump didn’t lose Michigan because of “illegal” ballots cast in Detroit. He lost Michigan because Biden beat him badly in the suburbs.

Barr also looked into allegations that voting machines across the country were rigged to switch Trump votes to Biden votes. He received two briefings from cybersecurity experts at the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI. “We realized from the beginning it was just bullshit,” Barr told me, noting that even if the machines somehow changed the count, it would show up when they were recounted by hand. “It’s a counting machine, and they save everything that was counted. So you just reconcile the two. There had been no discrepancy reported anywhere, and I’m still not aware of any discrepancy.”

* As Trump ranted about other examples of fraud, Meadows continued to sit silently with his arms crossed, his posture suggesting that he, too, was upset by what Barr had done.

“You know, you only have five weeks, Mr. President, after an election to make legal challenges,” Barr said. “This would have taken a crackerjack team with a really coherent and disciplined strategy. Instead, you have a clown show. No self-respecting lawyer is going anywhere near it. It’s just a joke. That’s why you are where you are.”

Interestingly, Trump didn’t argue when Barr told him that his “clown show” legal team had wasted time. In fact, he said, “You may be right about that.”

After going through his litany of claims—stolen ballots, fake ballots, dead people voting, rigged voting machines—Trump switched to other grievances, shouting at Barr for failing to prosecute Biden’s son Hunter. “If that had been one of my kids, they would have been all over him!” he said. By the end of the meeting, Trump was doing almost all of the talking. Why hadn’t Barr released John Durham’s report on the origins of the Russia investigation before the election? Why hadn’t he prosecuted former FBI Director James Comey? Trump was banging on the table. He said that Barr had been worthless.

Posted in Voter Fraud | Comments Off on Bill Barr Realized Quickly That Trump’s Claims About Voter Fraud Were BS

Aussie Mustache vs Luke Ford + Stunning GDL Admission!

Posted in Australia | Comments Off on Aussie Mustache vs Luke Ford + Stunning GDL Admission!

The History Of Lab Leaks & Infectious Disease & the New Temptations of Science (6-25-21)

00:00 Chris Hayes Podcast With Zeynep Tufekci, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=349sWvIpElA
29:00 Marc Shapiro on women spiritual leaders, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7M-JbB4LIk
40:00 Neterui Karta in America, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moshe_Ber_Beck
41:40 International Conference to Review the Global Vision of the Holocaust, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Conference_to_Review_the_Global_Vision_of_the_Holocaust
49:00 Beyond the Academic Ethic by Stephen Turner, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140392
1:02:00 Marc Shapiro’s visits to China
1:03:30 Can an Orthodox Jew eat at a vegan restaurant without kosher certification?
1:40:00 Glenn Loury talks to Charles Murray about his new book – Facing Reality, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqgUclg7-Lk
1:52:00 The Changing Temptations Of Science, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=140413
2:57:00 When whites take up identity politics, game over
3:00:00 Tucker Carlson on UFOs

Posted in Science | Comments Off on The History Of Lab Leaks & Infectious Disease & the New Temptations of Science (6-25-21)

Interview With Cultural Historian William Grange (6-21-21)

Professor William Grange, 74, published the following books:

* The Business of American Theatre (2020)
* Cabaret (Forms of Drama) (2021)
* Historical Dictionary of German Theater (2015)
* A Primer in Theatre History: From the Greeks to the Spanish Golden Age (2012)
* Historical Dictionary of German Literature to 1945 (2010)
* The A to Z of Postwar German Literature (2010)
* The A to Z of German Theater (2010)
* Historical Dictionary of Postwar German Literature (2009)
* Cultural Chronicle of the Weimar Republic (2008)
* Historical Dictionary of German Theater (2006)
* Hitler Laughing: Comedy in the Third Reich (2005)
* Comedy in the Weimar Republic: A Chronicle of Incongruous Laughter (1996)
* Partnership in the German Theatre: Zuckmayer and Hilpert, 1925-1961 (1991)

I first interviewed Mr. Grange in 2007.

Luke: “How did you discover the Alexander Technique?”

William: “I discovered it when I was a graduate student at Columbia. When I was working in Florida, I spent a weekend with Marjorie Barstow and 30 other students, and I came away feeling two inches taller. When I got to Lincoln, I met Robert Rickover… I had sciatica bad in New York, but after taking Alexander Technique, I’ve never had a problem. It’s the key to health and voice and organ function… With Alexander Technique, you are working with gravity.”

Luke: “Do you notice any cognitive changes from aging?”

William: “Yes. I’ll think, I need to go downstairs to get something, and by the time I get downstairs, I’ve forgotten what I was supposed to get. I have trouble with names. If I don’t stay close to my outline in a lecture, I’ll wander. I use to use an outline in lectures to guide me, now I use it to restrict me. For some reason, I always remember the name William Shakespeare, but sometimes I’ll forget John Dryden.”

Luke: I’ll give you five significant events in your lifetime — Kennedy, assassination, American involvement in Vietnam, 1965 Civil Riots bill, Nixon resignation, Reagan presidency. Which has the most significance?

William: “The civil rights legislation. We have two constitutions at war with each other — the original constitution and the civil rights constitution.”

Angels in America by Tony Kushner was a huge hit but nobody does it anymore unlike the work of Tennessee Williams, because there’s more than politics in Tennessee Williams. Bertholt Brecht‘s poetry is out of this world and people still do his plays.”

Luke: “How did Brecht produce great plays under communism?”

William: “He didn’t produce them under communism. He produced them on the run.”

In 1941, Brecht moved from Finland through the Soviet Union to Santa Monica, California, where his daughter Barbara became a cheerleader at Santa Monica High School.

According to Wikipedia:

In 1949 he moved to East Berlin and established his theatre company there, the Berliner Ensemble. He retained his Austrian nationality (granted in 1950) and overseas bank accounts from which he received valuable hard currency remittances. The copyrights on his writings were held by a Swiss company.[63] At the time he drove a pre-war DKW car—a rare luxury in the austere divided capital.

Though he was never a member of the Communist Party, Brecht had been schooled in Marxism by the dissident communist Karl Korsch. Korsch’s version of the Marxist dialectic influenced Brecht greatly, both his aesthetic theory and theatrical practice. Brecht received the Stalin Peace Prize in 1954.[64]

Brecht wrote very few plays in his final years in East Berlin, none of them as famous as his previous works. He dedicated himself to directing plays and developing the talents of the next generation of young directors and dramaturgs, such as Manfred Wekwerth, Benno Besson and Carl Weber. At this time he wrote some of his most famous poems, including the “Buckow Elegies”.

At first Brecht apparently supported the measures taken by the East German government against the uprising of 1953 in East Germany, which included the use of Soviet military force. In a letter from the day of the uprising to SED First Secretary Walter Ulbricht, Brecht wrote that: “History will pay its respects to the revolutionary impatience of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany. The great discussion [exchange] with the masses about the speed of socialist construction will lead to a viewing and safeguarding of the socialist achievements. At this moment I must assure you of my allegiance to the Socialist Unity Party of Germany.”[65]

Brecht’s subsequent commentary on those events, however, offered a very different assessment—in one of the poems in the Elegies, “Die Lösung” (The Solution), a disillusioned Brecht writes a few months later:

After the uprising of the 17th of June
The Secretary of the Writers Union
Had leaflets distributed in the Stalinallee
Stating that the people
Had forfeited the confidence of the government
And could win it back only
By redoubled efforts.

Would it not be easier
In that case for the government
To dissolve the people
And elect another?[66]

Brecht’s involvement in agitprop and lack of clear condemnation of purges resulted in criticism from many contemporaries who became disillusioned in communism earlier. Fritz Raddatz who knew Brecht for a long time described his attitude as “broken”, “escaping the problem of Stalinism”, ignoring his friends being murdered in the USSR, keeping silence during show trials such as Slánský trial.

Luke: “Who were the most underrated and overrated playwrights of the 20th Century?”

William: “Lillian Hellman should be completely forgotten. I’m not fond of Edward Albee. France’s Jean Giraudoux. Elfriede Jelinek is terrible. Harold Pinter is terrible. His plays are completely forgotten and yet he won the Nobel prize. You can’t go by the acclaim people get. Only history can do that.Thomas Bernhard is unintelligible. Unsung: Ödön von Horváth. Peter Handke. Irish playwright Sean O’Caseydidn’t win anything. He wrote Juno and the Paycock. Playwrights have comebacks but they don’t last too long. That’s the nature of theater. It is a topical, immediate art form. It only lasts during the performance. It’s not like sculpture or a painting.”

Luke: “How would you describe the modernist movement in theater?”

William: “It’s elitist. Modernism is nothing if not elitist. It’s the culture of the insider. When you see plays, for example, expressionism which embraces abstraction, and difficulty understanding telegraphed dialogue where they’re not talking to each other but at each other, this begins with Frank Wedekind, who didn’t have an agenda. He was a bohemian, the Bob Dylan of Germany if Bob Dylan had written plays. He was a great singer, guitar player and a modernist, these Lulu plays he wrote are really modernist plays, a lot of abstraction and dissonance but they’re still really interesting. They’re still doing Spring’s Awakening, though it’s now a musical. Most of his characters are half-educated, which he satirizes. Modernism is so catastrophic, particularly in the pictorial arts. If somebody could explain to me how Piet Mondrian is a great painter, or [Mark] Rothko… There’s no painting there, it’s just paint. Rothko said painting is nothing more than pigment on canvas. We’ve lost the 19th Century idea that art is a demonstration of skill. That had a huge effect on theater, because acting in the 20th Century became a psychoanalytic thing where you get deeply into the character, and you stay in the moment. It’s all bullshit from Stanislavski, the Sovietization of Stanislavski. There may be benefits there for beginning actors, but essentially, as an actor you are demonstrating skill, and the Stanislavski method fit into this modernist thing. The best example is Marlon Brando, who only did one play because he got sick and tired of memorizing plays. He did all these movies which are deep psychological characters, he was very talented at that, but as far as doing a show eight days a week and being able to repeat it night after night and project it night after night, he wasn’t interested in that. There’s more of an emphasis on improvisation and authenticity. What’s less authentic than acting on a stage? Here you are in a totally phony world with phony lighting and phony doorknobs and phony everything, and now it is supposed to be authentic? It’s supposed to be art.”

“The Method is the Americanization of the Stanislavski method. Lee Strasberg was one of these true believers. He was in the Group Theatre. They wanted to see the capitalist system overthrown and the Soviet system installed. Actors like having a regular salary, not being tied to commercial values, being able to call yourself an artist. That’s what the Soviet Union did. They fell into disrepute during the McCarthy era because they all had been members of the Communist party… Elia Kazan named names [of communists]. He was one of the founders of the Actors Studio. Lee Strasberg came later… Method acting is still very alive and now there are all these shows that make fun of it, including The Kominsky Method and Barry. These are wonderful shows that make fun of acting teachers like Lee Strasberg, and you see them on college campuses everywhere. The Method has been in fashion since the 1950s… Daniel Day-Lewis goes from the inside out. American actors go from the inside out. Faye Dunaway. None of the great stars of the Golden Age of Hollywood did. If you had suggested to Bette Davis, why don’t you try the Stanislavski method, she would have looked at you like a frog. It was a post World War II era adoption of Soviet standards of production.”

According to StudioBinder.com:

Method acting is a technique or type of acting in which an actor aspires to encourage sincere and emotionally expressive performances by fully inhabiting the role of the character. It is an emotion-oriented technique instead of classical acting that is primarily action-based. It was further developed and brought to American acting studios in the 1930s by Lee Strasberg and Elia Kazan.

However, Konstantin Stanislavski, a Russian actor and theatre director invented the technique in the early 1900s. Stanislavski did not call it method acting back then, but his ideas created a model to help actors build believable characters. Stanislavski’s approach was to encourage the actors to draw from personal experiences and memories in order to garner real emotions, and to connect with the characters. This stood in stark contrast to the more traditional, theatrical and classical acting of that time…

Lee Strasberg further developed the technique effectively creating “method acting.” His operating theory is that the actor should live the character he or she is playing even when not on stage or in front of the camera. This is why many method actors refuse to break character until filming is over. The lengths they go to embody the role often become obsessive involving serious weight loss, a change in sleeping habits and dietary norms, and more.

William: “Intellectual theater has never made any money and it never will make any money.”

Luke: “What’s the difference between modernist and post-modernist theater?”

William: “Modernism still believed in truth. Post-modernism does not believe in truth. There are only competing narratives. Everybody has a right to their own narrative. Post-modernism is fueled by the civil rights movement and civil rights legislation, in that it fuels identity politics, and your identity provides you with a narrative that is different from someone else’s narrative, and you have a right to have your narrative portrayed and represented in fiction and the arts.”

Luke: “Who are the great Christian playwrights?”

William: “You’d have to go back to the Middle Ages. There have been some modern playwrights who brought a Christian viewpoint. The Tidings Brought To Mary by Paul Claudel. American Channing Pollock was a great Christian playwright. He believed in plays that were didactic. He said preachers preach and plays should teach. He was popular in the 1920s. There were plays in the 1930s and 1940s that called for decency and cogency and that the world wasn’t going to hell in a hand basket. There was a sense that the world could make sense. Modernism drove that off the boards because there was just too much absurdity around to make it viable. Theater of the Absurd is a proto-post-modernist thing where nothing makes sense, nobody believes in anything, and nothing is worth believing in.”

Luke: “What can theater give people that they can’t get from TV?”

William: “Theater is a communal experience. Aristotle says something happens at a theater performance, catharsis, if it is a good performance, and we are united for that performance. You see this among people at a party when two people discover they saw the same movie and found things in the movie that they both agreed were important or interesting or amusing. The theater has started calling itself a story-telling medium and it is not. It engages actors with audiences in a process of identification. Theater is mimetic energy while a novel invites you into its world and embeds you as a character. Is the story in Romeo & Juliet what’s important? What makes the play is the poetry and the characters. Plays have to have tight characters to make sense. Sam Shepard and David Mamet are great playwrights.”

“Laughter is contagious. The best demonstration of this is Neil Simon. As he writes the play, he divides up the audience. He writes something and he knows that Part A will find this funny, and then the next line, Part G will find it funny, and then Part C will find it funny, and the laughter goes through the theater. Larry Gelbart, Mel Brooks and Woody Allen recognized that laughter is contagious and it spreads throughout the theater. That sense of identifying with the character, or the irony or contra-distinction is important for the communal experience. Laughter can be cathartic.”

Luke: “You’d want to be selective with whom you’d see a play?”

William: “Yes. That’s why no two theater performances are the same because they depend on the audience. The audience comes to the theater hoping that there will be theater that night. That there will be this exchange. It happens in movies to a lesser extent. You have more of a narrative focus.”

Luke: “What are the most exciting developments in theater in the past two decades?”

William: “There’s very little to shout about as far as artistic activity. The financial health of the theater is probably the most important development.”

Luke: “How much does having nude scenes help the bottom line?”

William: “It used to, but it doesn’t help at all anymore because it is seen as exploitative.”

“When you go on the stage, you’re selling yourself and a lot of people say that’s undignified… When men fake emotions on stage, that’s ok, but when a woman does it, it used be thought that she was prostituting herself.”

“In France, an actor couldn’t get a decent burial until the Revolution. In America, we didn’t have that problem because they were seen as business people. They often owned theaters.”

Luke: “What are the characteristics of a play that makes money?”

William: “It’s a musical. Musicals make five times what straight plays make. A straight play makes money if it is topical and has good actors. Usually straight plays have a dilemma of some kind. It’s usually an acting showcase. Comedies don’t need to be topical though it helps. Neil Simon knew the formula. There’s a central character, usually a man, who’s boxed in by a certain dilemma. That’s what makes comedy more lucrative than straight dramas because there’s a formula that’s easier to follow.”

Posted in Modernism, Post-Modernism, Theater | Comments Off on Interview With Cultural Historian William Grange (6-21-21)

NYT: Where Did the Coronavirus Come From? What We Already Know Is Troubling.

Zeynep Tufekci writes:

There were curious characteristics about the H1N1 influenza pandemic of 1977-78, which emerged from northeastern Asia and killed an estimated 700,000 people around the world. For one, it almost exclusively affected people in their mid-20s or younger. Scientists discovered another oddity that could explain the first: It was virtually identical to a strain that circulated in the 1950s. People born before that had immunity that protected them, and younger people didn’t.

But how on earth had it remained so steady genetically, since viruses continually mutate? Scientists guessed that it had been frozen in a lab. It was often found to be sensitive to temperature, something expected for viruses used in vaccine research.

It was only in 2004 that a prominent virologist, Peter Palese, wrote that Chi-Ming Chu, a respected virologist and a former member of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, told him that “the introduction of this 1977 H1N1 virus” was indeed thought to be due to vaccine trials involving “the challenge of several thousand military recruits with live H1N1 virus.”

For the first time, science itself seemed to have caused a pandemic while trying to prepare for it.

Now, for the second time in 50 years, there are questions about whether we are dealing with a pandemic caused by scientific research.

While the Chinese government’s obstruction may keep us from knowing for sure whether the virus, SARS-CoV-2, came from the wild directly or through a lab in Wuhan or if genetic experimentation was involved, what we know already is troubling.

Years of research on the dangers of coronaviruses, and the broader history of lab accidents and errors around the world, provided scientists with plenty of reasons to proceed with caution as they investigated this class of pathogens. But troubling safety practices persisted.

Worse, researchers’ success at uncovering new threats did not always translate into preparedness.

Even if the coronavirus jumped from animal to human without the involvement of research activities, the groundwork for a potential disaster had been laid for years, and learning its lessons is essential to preventing others.

Posted in Covid | Comments Off on NYT: Where Did the Coronavirus Come From? What We Already Know Is Troubling.