Podnotes summary: The World Health Organization has raised concerns about a monkeypox epidemic. While the disease itself is concerning, there’s something even worse: stigma. Stigma around behaviors that transmit monkeypox, like certain sexual activities among gay men, can be more harmful than the disease by perpetuating discrimination.
Monkeypox primarily affects sexually active men in the LGBTQ+ community but isn’t exclusive to them; it’s not a “gay disease.” It spreads through close contact and while it disproportionately impacts gay men engaging in frequent sexual encounters, stigmatizing this behavior could hinder efforts to combat the virus.
HIV-positive chefs in Toronto held an event to fight against stigma associated with infectious diseases. Randy Davis believes education is key to alleviating fear and ignorance which fuel such stigmas.
Stigmatization doesn’t just affect those who are reckless; during the AIDS crisis, innocent people suffered due to a few individuals’ actions. This shouldn’t be repeated with monkeypox—we must follow science instead of falling into discriminatory traps.
Misinformation online has led doctors to correct homophobic narratives surrounding monkeypox transmission—it’s not limited by sexuality or behavior alone.
The story shifts focus onto Matt Drudge of Drudge Report fame—a once-conservative figure who turned against Donald Trump for reasons unknown—showing how quickly allies can become adversaries based on personal biases or changing political winds. Former associates describe Drudge as sensitive and unpredictable—a drama queen prone to cutting ties over minor slights.
In politics and media alike, relationships are often fragile; alliances built one day may crumble the next as interests diverge—much like nations might betray their own spies for broader strategic gains—as suggested by reports of U.S.-Iranian dealings regarding Israeli agents involved in assassinations. These complex dynamics underscore human fallibility and shifting priorities rather than inherent malice or betrayal.
Ultimately, understanding why figures like Drudge pivot politically remains speculative at best—with various insiders offering theories from policy disagreements to personal dislikes—but what’s clear is that attention-seeking individuals will always seek relevance amidst changing landscapes.
To dodge monkeypox, simply avoid certain gatherings such as gay piss orgies.
Charlie Kirk tweeted about monkeypox being a lesser concern compared to other issues. The Jerusalem Post reported on Tehran’s assassination list linked to Iran targeting Assad agents. Car insurance has spiked by 55% during the Harris-Biden administration due to less law enforcement leading to more reckless driving and higher insurance claims.
A young girl is forced into marriage with an older Muslim man, raising questions about cultural integration versus diversity needs. This practice, along with slavery, persists in modern Islam, reflecting underdevelopment and brutality in some parts of the Arab-Islamic world.
The term “fascism” lacks a clear definition; it varied across regions as a counter-response to communism without a central doctrine or headquarters. After research, one way to prevent monkeypox seems avoiding specific events.
A fabricated story accused Israeli soldiers of raping Palestinians but was debunked after medical exams showed no evidence of assault—just an attempt at smuggling contraband via concealment.
Scott Rasmussen discussed polling differences between elites (those earning over $150k/year with postgraduate degrees living in dense areas) and average Americans regarding trust in government and individual freedom—the elite often favor more control than what public policy reflects.
Many elites believe most Americans share their views even when they don’t align with public sentiment—a disconnect influencing political toxicity and voter disenchantment within America’s polarized society.
Polls show close elections can lead to legitimacy disputes among voters who distrust results not aligned with their beliefs—with both sides having history disputing election outcomes.
As for polls’ accuracy during elections: while skepticism exists due to changes like those seen during COVID-19-related voting adjustments, overwhelming evidence suggests presidential vote counts are generally reliable despite right-wing media casting doubts through selective reporting.
An attorney for Detroit explained that the windows were partially covered during voting to protect voter privacy. Official observers and hundreds of party challengers were present, alongside dozens of reporters. Despite objections to the 2020 count’s legitimacy, analyses debunking these claims are more convincing; no reputable lawyer would support Trump’s rigged election claims due to facts like a suburban shift towards Biden.
Noah Carl suggests academia’s leftward shift is influenced by an influx of women who tend to be less supportive of free speech and more in favor of censorship—often seen as protective but potentially contributing to a culture less open to controversial discourse.
ABC Australia documentary Four Corners reports: Channel 7 faced allegations ranging from using sex workers and drugs for interviews, workplace bullying, discrimination, and harassment. Many employees signed NDAs upon leaving or being fired under various circumstances such as maternity leave or after filing complaints about their treatment at work. These agreements often silence them from discussing their experiences publicly.
The text also mentions how certain jobs can be tough on everyone but claims there’s an expectation that men will endure silently while women might not tolerate such conditions well. It discusses the impact this has on industries like journalism where competition is fierce and economic stability is waning.
Employers often hesitate to hire women who might become pregnant or people from groups they perceive as less desirable workers, prioritizing their interests. Similarly, employees aim to maximize earnings while minimizing effort, and employers seek the most work for the least pay. We’re conducting a Zoom interview with a woman who risks speaking out even anonymously about management’s tactics.
At Channel 7, she was told to sift through staff emails that could be used against them. Asked how she felt about this task, she now feels sick; it reflects a broader issue where many have had to do distasteful things at work. The idea is that employment equates to choosing your “slave owner”—a harsh view of reality.
She criticizes the abuse of internal policies meant for ethical purposes but notes self-interest is common among all people—men and women, employers and employees. Everyone can claim victimhood; surrounding individuals may feel wronged by those same complaining parties. Life involves inadvertently harming others while pursuing one’s goals.
Elliot Blatt urges us to recognize these realities—wake up and smell the eucalyptus.
Another great show Luke. I appreciate all the effort you put into your research and the videos you show provide high quality information from leading academics and experts. This show has a little bit of everything and the callers add a touch of variety to the livestreams. I like how some (if not most) of your world view is shaped around self-help/AA. Which is interesting because I feel what self-help/AA tries to get you to do is to confront your own ego. A problem we have on the right is how everyone wants to be unique as possible and refuses to work with others because we are all natural born contrarians. No wonder many of us don’t have good relationships with our family and friends, as we are ready to burn bridges at the drop of a hat if someone dares bring any harm upon our volatile emotions.
This show is a hidden gem and I always leave feeling happy, informed and centered. For the record my world view lines up closely to yours and Steve Sailor’s. I can’t stand the rampant pessimism, hatred and bickering which goes on the DR and this is a show where I can get my views said back to me and sometimes even challenged or confronted. I appreciate your normal and fair approach to charged topics like race, immigration and the Israel/palestine conflict. It tells me you have a social life.
I used to before just say every far right opinion I had and if someone had a problem with it then good one less weak willed, immature person out of my life. I like how you pull from mainstream news sources, even though sometimes it must feel like wading through mud to find pearls because I before had completely written off news websites before you shared a Richard Hanania article about how mainstream news sites are not all that bad and the article you share about the jealous pastor’s brother was very intriguing and provided a fascinating look into the world of end times obsessed Christian fundamentalists even though the journalist is most likely a giga shitlib. I could tell behind her faux neutrality she loathed all the people involved in the article.
Podnotes summary: Kamala Harris has been on the rise in recent weeks, with increasing poll numbers and support from both sides of the political spectrum. Despite previous doubts by Democratic elites who considered replacing her as vice president due to fears she might falter off-script, Harris has run a tight campaign that’s garnered media backing.
She’s now ahead of Donald Trump by four points in key swing states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan. This leaves Republicans searching for ways to counter her momentum.
Kamala Harris’ team is top-notch; they’re strategic and she follows their lead well—unlike Trump who often deviates from planned messages. Questions about his cognitive ability at age 78 have surfaced among Republicans.
There are concerns within the Harris campaign regarding potential scandals or controversies that could emerge. Tim Walls’ National Guard service portrayal has come under scrutiny, which may distract from Harris’ state tours if amplified by opponents like Trump.
At a rally in Michigan, when confronted by protesters accusing her of supporting genocide, rather than addressing their claims directly, Harris warned them not to help Trump win with such accusations.
Harris also hinted at potential policy changes towards Israel during a private meeting before the rally—a topic that remains sensitive for many voters.
In terms of societal commentary:
– YouTube’s content restrictions reflect pressures from advertisers more than individual decisions.
– The feminist movement aims at removing constraints on female sexuality while restricting male sexuality.
– Societies tend toward feminism until challenged by patriarchal forces; this shift impacts various social dynamics including dating and marriage norms.
The balance between choice and discipline is crucial: too much freedom can be overwhelming whereas structured limitations can guide productive behavior.
As we navigate these complex issues around gender politics and societal expectations, it’s clear there’s no one-size-fits-all answer but an ongoing dialogue about our evolving values and behaviors is essential.
Some women cope with insults to their femininity by turning to hobbies like gardening or arts and crafts, while others express anger through political activism. A few seek revenge on society due to feeling displaced from the dating scene.
Childlessness can deepen despair as it reduces opportunities for nurturing, impacting both personal fulfillment and societal stability. Commentary suggests that masculinity is about invasion, while femininity is about invitation; mistakes made by each gender are influenced by these traits.
The UK faces social media crackdowns following riots sparked by misinformation. Prime Minister K Star warns of arrests for sharing riot footage online. The unrest began after a tragic incident at a children’s dance event led to the wrongful vilification of an immigrant suspect on social media.
Nigel Farage discusses divisions in British cities, blaming unchecked immigration and identity politics for eroding national identity and fueling violence. He criticizes government responses during COVID-19 lockdowns, advocating free speech over censorship on social media platforms like Facebook.
David Starkey highlights ethnic tensions in Britain, noting how multiculturalism has led to differential treatment by police towards certain groups. This approach often exempts historically marginalized communities from criticism but stokes resentment among those who feel excluded from such protections.
In conclusion, divisive issues related to immigration, policing practices, and freedom of speech are intensifying debates within the UK as leaders grapple with maintaining order amid rising discontent.
Tim Walz’s a joyful, effective communicator with an impressive background. Even as a conservative, I acknowledge that. However, the media critical of him focus on his liberal policies in Minnesota and warn against the financial implications if he gains more power.
Tim Walz is known for being progressive and not moderate within his party. His selection has been controversial; critics label him extreme and blame him for unrest in Minnesota.
Contrastingly, Trump confidently faced the media while Harris avoided it. She briefly engaged with press questions but should face more to provide unscripted answers.
The discussion shifted to riots in the UK and their dynamics influenced by racial tensions and new right-wing outlets like GB News funded by foreign interests possibly aimed at sowing division.
Debates also touched on low fertility rates driving immigration and multiculturalism despite resistance from some who prefer understanding over emotional responses.
Media outlets sensationalize news for attention but elite media balance this with maintaining status among certain demographics or advertisers’ support—highlighting Joe Biden’s cognitive decline was avoided due to civility norms despite its obviousness to many outside elite circles.
Lastly, discussions turned to two-tier policing where different communities receive varied police treatment highlighting disparities without much mainstream effort to understand white working-class frustrations compared to other groups’ riots.
The British government has a policy of multiculturalism and has been dispersing refugees across the nation to cut costs and encourage assimilation. This, however, leads to increased housing prices in poorer areas due to contracted private landlords raising rents. The government believes spreading migrants out prevents isolated communities from forming and speeds up assimilation.
In an unrelated incident, I witnessed a father with his children dangerously close to traffic. It raised questions about when it’s appropriate to intervene with strangers who may be at risk.
Regarding political figures like Tommy Robinson and David Starkey, opinions vary on their influence and credibility. Trust in commentators is hard-earned since they often speak outside their expertise.
Domestic politics are equally contentious; Labour’s majority doesn’t reflect its popularity or connection with the white working class. Japan’s societal differences also come into focus when comparing it with Britain regarding optimism for the future despite modern comforts.
Finally, media coverage of politicians requires scrutiny as it influences public perception without necessarily providing substance or encouraging accountability in potential leaders.
I often wonder, if foreign support for a political cause is good or bad. The African National Congress accepted Soviet aid and I can’t blame them—they needed help. But does accepting foreign assistance mean we’re part of the problem?
In Britain, I want my country to improve but worry about foreign influence like Russia’s backing of extreme groups. Are they trying to destabilize us? Arrests during riots make me question the freedom to observe protests.
Our prosecutor-turned-leader seems too eager to punish rioters harshly, with no bail and quick prison sentences. It deters people but also punishes those caught in the moment—like the young man jailed for stealing from a bakery.
Stephen: Discussing politics, I don’t trust mainstream media; instead, I follow independent voices online who dare speak out against current issues. People are apolitical in real life; they accept gender equality on the surface but avoid discussing sensitive topics openly due to fear of repercussions.
Online speech restrictions have grown significantly though people still speak freely in private settings. There’s a class divide in political correctness adherence—with working-class individuals less influenced by it than middle- or upper-class ones.
The UK has its own set of problems: work environments without English speakers, healthcare access issues, housing shortages—all affecting deprived communities who feel overlooked by media and elites.
Humor is restricted; feminism isn’t prominent among everyday folks who focus more on practical matters than ideology. Political correctness awareness exists yet doesn’t dominate casual conversations as much as one might think.
As for sexual divides and relationship dynamics among youth—it varies across social classes with different attitudes toward sex and relationships evident between age groups and backgrounds.
Luke: Despite having its issues, England’s government still provides a better quality of life than most people in history or the world today. While it may not be as prosperous as neighboring Luxembourg, it holds up well compared to other nations. However, our perception of the world is often biased by our own attitudes – optimists see positive news while pessimists focus on doom and gloom.
The media feeds into these biases with their stories. For instance, I’ve observed that society has become too comfortable pressing the “easy button,” losing resilience in the process. It seems like genuine grit is dwindling as more people rely on external support systems rather than internal strength.
Kip: Financial concerns have grown even for those who are technically millionaires due to inflation eroding what was once considered wealth. The concept of community and culture feels audacious now; there’s an overwhelming sense that we’re spiraling down into madness.
Financially speaking, debt levels are alarming. As interest rates rise from 3.9% to 4.1%, worries about economic stability increase alongside them. Observing spelling bees reveals how immigrant children outperform native ones, suggesting a decline in homegrown excellence.
Luke: In education too, passion-driven learning seems rarer among local students compared to their Asian counterparts who excel through rote learning and pragmatic approaches—yet innovation typically emerges from those willing to explore beyond test material.
Kip: Concerns also extend to regional banks struggling with low-interest loans and potential bailouts by governments which could lead us further towards dependency on state assistance rather than self-reliance.
Looking at global dynamics, countries like Saudi Arabia have begun questioning long-standing agreements like oil trade in US dollars—a sign that America’s influence might be waning as others grow tired of playing by rules set predominantly for US benefit.
The accumulation of gold by Asian governments contrasts sharply with sales in America over the past decade; this shift signals a possible transfer of wealth and power Eastward despite America’s military might keeping it dominant—for now.
Finally, discussing whether another country could challenge American dominance remains speculative but highlights underlying shifts away from traditional power structures toward something new yet undefined.
In the past, the English Tory party was seen as self-worshipping and undeserving of its own admiration. England’s history is marked by significant advancements such as increased life expectancy, prosperity, health improvements, and mass literacy—all starting here. Yet now we face a unique situation with unprecedented levels of migration since 1997 that surpass even ancient population movements in scale.
Mass immigration began modestly post-World War II but has since escalated dramatically. This surge has had profound impacts on society and has occurred alongside suppressed public debate—a combination that exacerbates problems.
Turning to human rights discourse, historically it was conservatives who championed these ideals in Europe after World War II—not the left as commonly assumed today. Conservatives saw human rights as a means to protect democracy from tyranny—whether from majoritarianism or totalitarian ideologies within socialism or fascism.
After WWII, British Protestant conservatives valued time-tested institutions over popular sovereignty while Catholic French conservatives sought corporate structures reminiscent of medieval times. Both groups were skeptical about universal rights applications; instead, they favored liberties tailored to specific historical communities.
The conservative push for a European human rights court aimed at protecting individual freedoms against expansive state power reflects this tradition. However, they did not extend these protections universally across all peoples—a notion still debated today regarding European identity amidst growing diversity.
Nowadays in Europe and America alike, there’s contention over how much authority courts should wield versus elected bodies—a reversal from past perspectives where conservatives once advocated for judicial oversight over executive actions.
The complex legacy of conservative involvement in shaping modern human rights continues to influence contemporary politics amid discussions around immigration policy and national identity within an increasingly diverse Europe.
Keir Starmer was a staunch leftist, unchanged over time. Unlike Jeremy Corbyn, who supported Marxist dictators and terrorist groups, Starmer’s alignment is different. He believes in the human rights culture that many Western critics of Israel subscribe to—a culture now questioned by some on the right who see it as undermining social cohesion.
Human rights have become politicized; conservatives once supportive now see them hijacked by progressive agendas. This divide affects global standards and national interests, with each side prioritizing either security or personal liberties.
The United Nations Human Rights Council and associated organizations champion human rights but are seen by some as biased against Israel. Critics argue that universities chase popularity rather than truth, often ignoring flawed science for fame or funding—mirroring issues found in corporations and governments alike.
In academia and media, incentives encourage networking over honesty; criticism can jeopardize one’s standing within an institution or community. The quest for evidence-based self-help is challenging since what works varies from person to person without clear scientific backing.
Finally, discussions about addiction treatment highlight how complex clinical advice gets oversimplified online for mass appeal—reflecting systemic pressures across platforms promoting easily digestible content at the expense of nuanced accuracy.
WP: Jose gazed at the wall sign that read, “In the morning when I rise, give me Jesus,” and pondered how his brother Jeremiah was using Christianity to gain fame. With a large social media following, Jeremiah spread far-right beliefs claiming Trump was chosen by God. Jose’s frustration grew as he saw his brother twist religion for political gains.
Jeremiah led a church and school preparing for end times, sold e-courses on prophecy, and shared supposed divine messages about American politics online. Meanwhile, 37-year-old Jose struggled with dead-end jobs to support his small ministry in Alabama.
Their father always sided with Jeremiah which pained Jose who felt compelled to speak out against false prophets leading believers astray. Despite knowing it could cause family strife or attract public criticism from strangers labeling him delusional or worse.
Finally deciding to act, Jose posted a message challenging religious fabrications on Facebook. He knew morality sometimes meant speaking up even if it risked conflict with those closest to you.
The story illustrates complex dynamics within families where success contrasts sharply with struggle; how personal narratives must adapt when faced with such disparities; and the tension between loyalty and truth amidst differing interpretations of shared experiences.
Addressing broader issues like gender roles in combat or cultural oppression claims underscores societal debates over equality versus recognizing inherent differences among groups—highlighting that liberal perspectives often prioritize some harms over others depending on ideological stances.
Dennis Prager points out that all punishment contains revenge.
People on the right are not as horrified by revenge as people on the left because the right wants to strongly punish norm violators.
Other distinguishing features of the right include a reflex that traditional ways of people (such as the nuclear family) are better than untested ways, and more comfort with hierarchy and inequality.
Amos Harel, a military and political analyst for Haaretz, said that one of the most dispiriting aspects of the current nightmare is the way Sinwar was able to provoke the Netanyahu government into a state of horrific and ruinous fury. “The sense in Israeli society is that we are going down the drain, and Sinwar has helped drag us there,” Harel told me. “When we justify things we never would have justified before, we are in the moral gutter. Words like ‘revenge’ used to be heard only among the Bezalel Smotrichs and the Itamar Ben-Gvirs of the world”—two particularly reactionary ministers in Netanyahu’s cabinet. “Now military units and mainstream colonels are using terms like nekama, revenge. It’s almost part of the norm now. I am not sure it was part of Sinwar’s great plan, but that is where we are.”
Posted inConservatives|Comments Off on The Left Is Horrified By Revenge
Herbert Aptheker, a senior member of the American Communist Party (CPUSA) and influential scholar of Marxism, argued for framing the Arab-Israeli conflict in terms of “imperialism and colonialism versus national liberation and social progress,” as well as through the lens of racial oppression. Contrary to Israeli rulers’ claims, he declared, the greatest threat facing Israel came not from Arabs but from Israel’s own extremist right-wing government, which had turned Israel into the “handmaiden of imperialism and colonialist expansionism.” He equated Israel with Nazi Germany by referring to the recent Six-Day War as a blitzkrieg, a quintessentially Soviet propaganda term meant to evoke Hitler’s invasion of the USSR. Today, said Aptheker, it was Jews who were “acting out the roles of occupiers and tormentors” of the oppressed. He called on the audience to work tirelessly to unmask “the horror of the June war and its aftermath.” So closely did Aptheker’s speech follow the anti-Israel logic and idiom of Soviet propaganda that it may well have been written for him in Moscow.
The two documents the conference unanimously adopted—the “Appeal to the Conscience of the World” (reportedly signed by 100 members of the Indian parliament) and a “Declaration”—conveyed similar messages with even more bombast. Evoking classic antisemitic tropes, they accused Israel of having cynically violated all “standards of human decency,” and declared that it had made “a mockery of all human moral values.” They dubbed Palestinian terrorism—aka “resistance”—as “righteous and justified.” In an attempt to make the Middle Eastern conflict more relatable, they equated it with the central cause animating the Western left at the time: the war in Vietnam. They called for all the people on the planet to resist “imperialist-Zionist propaganda” and expressed appreciation for the “progressive and peace-loving” Soviet Union and other socialist states and Non-Aligned countries that “supported the Arab cause.”
The message echoed throughout the global leftist universe. The CPUSA, which was almost wholly subsidized by the Soviet Union, published Aptheker’s speech and both statements in full in its theoretical journal Political Affairs. The African Communist, the Soviet-financed quarterly organ of the South African Communist Party (SACP), which was deeply intertwined with the African National Congress (ANC), ran a piece titled “Zionism and the Future of Israel,” closely reflecting the language of the New Delhi conference, complete with the word blitzkrieg. Its author, who claimed to be a South African living in Tel Aviv, accused Zionist “fanatical zealots” of exploiting the biblical concept of Jewish chosenness to fan the flames of Jewish supremacy (“chauvinism” in the language of the day), while equating Israel with apartheid South Africa.
What’s so interesting about this half-century-old Soviet propaganda is how precisely it mirrors the language emanating from the anti-Israel left since Oct. 7. Today’s left, too, speaks of Israel as a racist, imperialist, and colonialist state; equates it with Nazi Germany and apartheid South Africa; disparages Jews for having turned into oppressors; and proclaims Palestinians’ inalienable right to resist their colonial oppression by any means necessary.
Posted inAnti-Semitism|Comments Off on Zombie Anti-Zionism
"This guy knows all the gossip, the ins and outs, the lashon hara of the Orthodox world. He’s an [expert] in... all the inner workings of the Orthodox world." (Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff)
