Uncommon People: The Rise and Fall of The Rock Stars

David Hepworth writes in this 2017 book:

* Rolling Stone , once the organ of the alternative society, was about to move from San Francisco to New York in order to be nearer its real customers, the agencies that bought colour ads for cigarettes, drink and cars which were aimed at its free – spending thirty – something readership. The editorial had simultaneously smartened up to provide a more seductive environment. The photographers were more upmarket, which meant they brought with them their customary armies of stylists, make – up artists, hairdressers and miscellaneous ministers of the arts of vanity to make sure that their subjects looked reassuringly rich as well as edgily stylish. The look of 1976 was expensive and dissolute.

* THE GIRLS WHO shared Elvis Presley’s bed knew the drill. They had to listen for his breathing, which had on occasion seemed to stop in the night. If he got up to go to the bathroom they should knock on the door after a while and ask if he was all right. There were members of his personal entourage around the house at all times. Further staff, including a nurse who worked for his personal doctor George Nichopoulos, known to all as ‘Doctor Nick’, lived in trailers behind the house. Nonetheless the women he slept with were his last defence against the thing he feared most, loneliness.
Since he was a small child Elvis had hated to sleep alone. Once he was famous he no longer needed to. If he wasn’t with one of his longer – term girlfriends, willing women could be brought to him.

* Among the diminishing number of people who actually cared about Elvis Presley there was a feeling he was running out of road.

* Like all superstars Elvis alternated between utter certainty and crippling doubt, spending very little time in the region between the two where normal human beings live out their lives.

* Even when he was dead, Time magazine didn’t put him on their cover. Nor did People . They didn’t think he was big enough, in the sense that they felt he no longer reached into people’s hearts. Elvis was just a rock star who wasn’t hot any more. Then, as the days turned into weeks and the news programmes continued to run footage of distraught middle – aged people talking about what Elvis had meant to them, the reality began to sink in. The late Elvis, as opposed to the living Elvis, was the one thing they could agree on.

* IN 1963 AMERICAN journalist Michael Braun went to Sunderland to write about a new group called the Beatles. As he observed how these four men interacted with the world he began to recognize that their appeal went beyond just music. ‘I began suspecting,’ he wrote later, ‘that I was in the presence of a new kind of person.’
Over the years pop music has unwittingly introduced many new kinds of people to a wider world. From Little Richard and Jerry Lee Lewis through Pete Townshend and Janis Joplin to Lou Reed and Bob Marley, pop has introduced young people to personalities they might never have encountered any other way.

* [Robert] Plant was rebuilding his family life, which had been shattered not only by the loss of his child but also by an article his wife had read in an American music magazine which suggested that once on the road her husband was not faithful.
In those days before the death of distance it was possible for even world – famous musicians to be accompanied on tour by a species of ‘road wife’ without their actual wives getting to hear about it. The tabloids weren’t particularly interested in these people, the specialist press knew discretion was the price they paid for access, and the mobile phone and the internet were still the stuff of science fiction. Furthermore the dictionary of disapproval had not yet been developed. Drug users weren’t said to have substance issues. Heavy drinkers weren’t yet alcoholics. Rock stars who expected unfettered access to the bodies of any young women in their orbit weren’t yet deemed to have a problem with male entitlement.

* Poses are vital in rock. They are not some optional extra. Poses are what send the pulses of young men racing. There was a splendour about Led Zeppelin’s swagger. It was the apogee of a certain sort of rock dream. None of the hundreds of bands that came after them and tried to adopt the same shape were anything like as convincing. However, like everything else in show business, it was a trick based on confidence. Once Plant no longer believed he could get away with it, once the essential absurdity of it began to dawn on him, once he started to believe the things all those punks were whispering in his ear via the letters pages of the music papers, once he was no longer cocksure, the magic inevitably ebbed away. After all, he was an old man. He was thirty – one.

* Although he played the wild man on stage, in the real world Ozzy was as helpless and needy as a small boy. Sharon found this side of him attractive. Without her he simply couldn’t function. Together they flourished.

* There is a disorientation in the atmosphere around a rock band on tour which brings about a certain detachment from the elementary laws of physics and chemistry governing normal life. Even if none of the protagonists are particularly unhinged or suffering from the need to test the limits of their own mortality there is a tendency to do the ill – advised which would only rarely arise in everyday life. This was particularly the case in 1982 when artists didn’t yet employ people whose primary job was to protect them from themselves. The world in which these people lived and moved was attuned to extremes. Nobody was yet suggesting that exercise and abstinence might be the secret to surviving life on the road. They were all prone to thinking themselves indestructible. The touring life was sustained by drugs and drink. Very few didn’t partake. All these people were moved to go beyond the red line, to hang themselves over the precipice, with predictable consequences.

* In June [1982], James Honeyman – Scott, the guitarist with the Pretenders, was found dead of heart failure in a girlfriend’s flat. ‘Cocaine intolerance’ was blamed. This was only days after he had agreed that bassist Pete Farndon should be fired from the same group because of his own addiction to heroin. Farndon would be found dead in his bath less than a year later.

* 1982 seemed short on new rock stars but it was long on people who wanted to act like them. Rolling Stone ’s cover stars for that year were mostly actors and TV people – David Letterman, Robin Williams, Mariel Hemingway, Matt Dillon, Timothy Hutton and Warren Beatty – all affecting the casual drag and ‘we mean it’ looks of rock stars. On 5 March the comedian and actor John Belushi was found dead in a bungalow at the Chateau Marmont, having ingested a speedball, a cocktail of heroin and cocaine. The woman who administered it to him, Cathy Smith, was a former associate of three members of the Band…

* On 30 April Lester Bangs, the rock critic whose words were as impressive in print as their author was unimpressive in person, whose reviews were a plea for acceptance from musicians and hipsters who wouldn’t spare him the time of day, who liked to say that rock and roll wasn’t so much a music as a way of living your life, finished the final draft of a new book he called Rock Gomorrah . His idea of celebrating completion was to take a number of Valium pills together with a strong cold remedy. He never woke up. He was thirty – three.

* Bands are like small political parties, presenting a united front to the outside world while a low – level internecine war is being perpetually waged within, a war in which nothing is forgiven or forgotten, nothing is openly discussed, and any person brave enough to propose a change of direction suffers the fate of being openly derided for doing what so clearly needs doing. This Is Spinal Tap captures the imperceptible heightening of tension and meaningful sidelong glances that greet any member apparently seeking the approval of anyone outside the group.

* rock industry: that it relies on the audience’s willing suspension of disbelief. Once you’re no longer swept along by the power of its grand illusion, once you begin to question the conventions to which it clings, once the wires along which it dances are plainly visible, once you actually glimpse the desperation in the musicians’ eyes as they see some piece of on – stage business begin to unravel, once the amplification fails and you hear them barking at each other like any bunch of workmen in crisis, then you are seeing the world through the lens of Spinal Tap.

* 1985 was the year the scale of rock changed the nature of rock. The bigger the show is, the more it’s about ritual rather than content.

* THE ROCK INTERVIEW is an artificial interaction. It’s primarily a business transaction, entered into by both parties for their mutual commercial benefit. At the same time form dictates that it must masquerade as a friendly, almost flirtatious exchange of ideas. It often takes months of negotiation to set up but then takes place as if it’s a chance meeting. It demands a display of outward nonchalance from both interviewer and interviewee. The former is flushed and excited but pretends to be relaxed. The latter is suspicious and guarded but pretends to be relaxed.

* By the mid – eighties the family structures of rock superstars had come to resemble those of all – powerful sovereigns or landed aristocrats of years gone by. Their success meant that they, and they alone, sat at the top of a pyramid of wealth, status and power. As they looked down from the summit they could see the serried ranks of their heirs, their heirs’ tow – headed dependents, the long – established courtiers who transacted their business for them, the vassals and liegemen who handled the tasks beneath their dignity or competence, the new mistresses and the old ones who always knew far more than they let on, even the fools and soothsayers whose job it was to calm their troubled mind…

* The most impressionable group in society are teenage boys. They have a touching readiness to believe that somewhere nearby a bunch of young men only slightly older than they are and certainly no more exceptional are living a life larger, louder and more licentious than any in human history and are getting paid a fortune for doing so.

* The golden rule in music is that the more people protest that it’s all about the music, the more certain it is that it’s all about something else entirely. The thing that mattered most in hard rock was not the rock or the hardness thereof; it was looking the part. And Guns N’ Roses did. They combined glamour and danger in just the right proportions. This is the quality that was impossible to contrive.

* when fashion editors think of a rock star they think of Axl Rose in 1987. Nobody has ever looked more the part.

* The mother of the singer James Taylor, who had watched this process at close quarters, sagely observed that where musicians are concerned ‘The work is always the last thing that goes because it’s the thing that holds their life together.’
Their counsellors had to deal with the toxic combination of arrogance and self – abasement that is often the lot of the rock star. Performing provided its own high, both in terms of the sheer satisfaction it brought with it and also the transformational effect it had on their status. When not performing they were prone to feeling that others had detected their inner worthlessness.

* As part of her treatment at the Betty Ford Center, where she was an in – patient with Tammy Wynette, [Stevie] Nicks had to write the words ‘I am not special: I am dying’ on a piece of paper. ‘That’s a serious thing to swallow,’ she reflected.
Ringo and Clapton were among the first wave of rock stars to change their ways with professional help. In time they would be joined by hundreds of others until it seemed that whenever you interviewed a musician over the age of forty they would volunteer their stories of how they’d stopped using drugs or alcohol. People who in the past were reluctant talkers would now hold forth at length with the practised ease of those accustomed to giving a detached account of their strengths and weaknesses. The confessional press interview became almost an extension of the process of therapy. Major retrospective features increasingly followed a standard arc: I flew high, I went too far, I crashed, I put myself back together with the help of a good woman/man/manager/therapist, and now what I want most of all from my public is forgiveness. Therapy saved the lives of a lot of rock stars, which is a blessing. It also diminished their mystique, which isn’t.

* After Madonna, stars had no secrets. What’s more, the technology that would eventually enable us all to be the stars of our own lives was already on its way.

* Gay people in the world of rock, which likes to congratulate itself on being an outrider for new ways of living, were no quicker to announce their sexuality than their counterparts in Parliament, business, sport or the movies.

* People in rock bands can’t afford to allow themselves to glimpse the preposterousness of what they do.

* Prince could do anything. In terms of all – round ability he was probably the most accomplished rock star of them all. He could play most instruments, he had written huge hit songs like ‘Purple Rain’ and ‘Little Red Corvette’, he could sing in a variety of styles…

* If in 1993 Michael Jackson had still been a member of the Jacksons rather than a solo performer, it’s possible that somebody in their circle would have told him that sharing his bed with thirteen – year – old Jordan Chandler was likely to be interpreted unsympathetically.

Posted in Rock | Comments Off on Uncommon People: The Rise and Fall of The Rock Stars

Everything and Less: The Novel in the Age of Amazon

Mark McGurl writes in this 2021 book:

* all fiction is genre fiction in that it caters to a generic desire.

* With its by – all – accounts absolute requirement of a happy ending for it to even receive recognition as a member of the genre by its devotees, the romance’s unforgivable sin is that it flagrantly satisfies the “imaginative needs of the community”… What other genres do indirectly, or even “critically,” it does shamelessly in the open and in resourcefully new ways.

From Pamela to the present, the novel in the English – speaking world has developed alongside and within a capitalist economy increasingly oriented toward consumer enjoyment and, if only implicitly, has been telling the story of that economy the whole time. What we now label the “romance” novel is the reflexive expression of the novel’s original appeal: not only is it written for the satisfaction of the imaginative needs of the reader, but it is about that satisfaction in the figure of the heroine and her mate, who always get what they want, and who in getting what they want reassure their readers of the legitimacy and continuity of the social order.

* Entering through the eyes as a succession of words, the novel is transformed into a series of affectively charged mental images of people and places.

* It would be for Norman Holland, whose classic Dynamics of Literary Response (1968) argues that the better part of what we do when we read is to activate emotional resonances between the text and our unacknowledged fantasies of return to pre – oedipal pleasures.

In his view, the conferral of interpretive meaning on the literary text is a form of defense against the unruliness and unspeakability of those pleasures, which are nonetheless the text’s primary raison d’être and source of generic appeal. In this sense, and never more so than when it is utterly obscene “adult entertainment,” all literature is children’s literature at its core.

* In the mostly unconscious act of introjection, which converts words into psychic events, the reader finds (or feels) analogies between the text’s fantasy material and their own. I have added an additional “basement” level, representing something like the Lacanian or Lovecraftian Real — that is, the substratum of utter indifference to human well – being from which literary and all other forms of fantasizing are obsessively repeated attempts to recover. The literary text is in this sense a therapeutic processing of that indifference as a pleasurable sensation of narrative meaning, and each distinct genre a quasi – algorithmic form of doing so.

Posted in Amazon | Comments Off on Everything and Less: The Novel in the Age of Amazon

The Rise of Writing: Redefining Mass Literacy

Deborah Brandt writes in her 2014 book:

* Writing has always been used for work, production, output, earning, profit, publicity, practicality, record-keeping, buying, and selling. Increasingly, writing itself is the product that is bought and sold, as it embodies knowledge, information, invention, service, social relations, news – that is, the products of the new economy. At the turn of the twentieth century, knowledge workers represented 10 percent of all employees. By 1959 this proportion had increased to more than 30 percent of the workforce, and by 1970 it was 50 percent. In 2000, knowledge workers were estimated to account for 75 percent of the employed population, with the biggest gains found among highly educated professional
and technical workers in government and service-producing industries (Wyatt and Hecker 2006). If, as Thomas Stewart (1998) asserts, “Knowledge has become the primary ingredient in what we make, do, buy, and sell” (p. 12), then writing has become a dominant form of labor as it transforms knowledge and news into useable, shareable form.

* The status of writing as a dominant form of labor in the US economy puts an unusual degree of pressure on people’s scribal skills, as their writing literacy is pulled deeply into manufacturing, processing, mining, and distributing information and knowledge. Writing is a time-intensive form of labor that tends to follow people home.

* So rapacious are the production pressures on writing, in fact, that they are redefining reading, as people increasingly read from the posture of the writer, from inside acts of writing, as they respond to others, research, edit, or review other people’s writing or search for styles or approaches to borrow and use in their own writing. Reading is being subordinated to the needs of writing…

* the idea that a text belongs to the person who writes it is not the only concept of authorship that can be found in current US copyright law. When it comes to writing undertaken within the scope of employment – in other words, the writing done by most people in society – copyright turns inside out: under a provision called “Work Made for Hire,” the law is careful to sever writers from ownership claims over the texts that they write at work.

* In the eyes of the law, the employer is the author of their texts. As individuals, workplace writers are not allowed to profit individually from the writing they do. Even the knowledge they may produce in their heads as a result of the writing they do at work is technically not theirs to benefit from. Further, workaday writers are not legally entitled to express their own views through their workplace writing. They can be fired for doing it, and they won’t get much support from the courts if they appeal. According to the Supreme Court, people do not really write at work as citizens or free beings but rather as willingly enlisted corporate voices. At least in their official capacities, workaday writers don’t write as themselves at work, according to the Court. They are not individually responsible for what they are paid to say. Consequently, they don’t really mean what they say. In fact, according to the Court, people who write for pay can’t really mean what they say. Their speech rights are corrupted and, hence, inoperable. From this perspective, writing starts to look a lot less romantic and a lot more feudal.

* copyright is reserved for texts that are considered creative or artistic, or that otherwise promote learning, or have some other enduring social utility…

* teachers and academics still enjoy this privileged exemption and, by dint of long-standing tradition, retain rights to their own writing and other intellectual property even when done on an employer’s premises.

* Constitutional scholar C. Edwin Baker (1989) has written most compellingly of what happens to a citizen’s voice once it is put into paid service – when it becomes (someone else’s) rented property. Such coerced speech necessarily loses its free-speech protections because it is no longer self-directed: “Once a person is employed to say what she does, the speech usually represents not her own self-expression but, at best, the expression of the employer” (p. 54 ). Baker elaborates:

“The First Amendment protects a person’s use of speech to order and create the world in a desired way and as a tool for understanding and communicating about the world in ways
he or she finds important. These uses are fundamental aspects of individual liberty and choice. However, in our present historical setting, commercial speech reflects market
forces that require enterprises to be profit-oriented. This forced profit orientation is not a manifestation of individual freedom or choice. Unlike the broad categories of protected speech, commercial speech does not represent an attempt to create or affect the world in a way that has any logical or intrinsic connection to anyone’s substantive values or personal wishes.”

* speech made pursuant to official duties receives no First Amendment protection. Like private employers, government may control its employees’ speech in order to protect and promulgate its own interests.

* workaday writers are legally severed – economically, ethically, and politically – from the words they write on the job.

* writing – particularly literary writing but not exclusively so – enjoys its own prestige. Through the sometimes convoluted history of literacy in this culture and the ideologies it produces, writing is associated with creativity, talent, intellect, sensibility, knowledge – in a word, authority. In general, writing is a desirable skill, a somewhat scarce skill, respected for its difficulty and the achievement it represents, particularly when it results in publication. Writing benefits most of all from the cultural prestige of reading. Because many forms of reading over time have been marked with high cultural value, this value has come to extend to those who can write in those forms. In this climate, then, writing may bequeath its high status to an individual who engages in it. One can “make a name” through writing. Writing is also its own verifiable record of a powerful engagement with literacy and all of its goodness – including the human growth that is presumed to be entailed in an artistic or intellectual experience. This achievement of the writing per se certifies the writer and warrants the reading. Writing, then, can be an independent source of social value and power and, with some exceptions, it enhances the stature of anyone who claims authorship.

* Legal ghostwriting also collides with the custom of the court to be lenient with self-represented litigants.

* the Internet seems to be favoring a less original form of writing: creation by citation, sampling, cutting and pasting, the blurring of the roles of writers and readers.

* writing is wrapped in yearning and sometimes titanic ambition, tantamount to chasing a dream…

* Just as these young people were well aware of the high prestige afforded the successful artist or published author, they were also well aware of the precariousness of the occupation and the difficulty or unlikelihood of making a viable living as an independent writer…

* a writing orientation can create wariness toward reading, particularly toward its association with passivity and conformity.

* Another predicament of authorship… had to do with managing relations between one’s life and one’s work. …authorship could bring a heightened sense of confusion
and vulnerability, especially in the vicinity of friends and family. …misattribution, parody, estrangement, charges of libel, self exposure, the need for a pseudonym – these are all uncomfortable experiences that can attach to people who write yet rarely enter writing instruction as a focus for exploration and learning.

* reading is largely an internalizing process… writing per se is action in the world. It is an externalizing experience, and so its effects, as we have seen, can come back at writers from the outside. Thoughts can stay private during reading, but they are relentlessly externalized during writing. …bring more wear and tear, more trouble, more risk. Writing risks social exposure, political retaliation, legal blame.

* in the twenty-first century, citizens are more likely to run afoul of the courts not because they are able to read too little but because they choose to write too much. Prosecutors and defense attorneys scour the online writing of prospective jurors, including blogs, Facebook entries, and tweets, to look for predispositions and biases. Several criminal convictions have been overturned in recent years after jurors were discovered writing online about their jury experiences (Grow 2010). Freewheeling personal expression associated with social media is in friction with the court’s traditional ways of protecting the rights of defendants by controlling the speech of jurors.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Rise of Writing: Redefining Mass Literacy

Invasion is a structure not an event (8-16-24)

Adam Kirsch writes in the WSJ:

The most frequently quoted sentence in the literature of settler colonialism is from the Australian scholar Patrick Wolfe: “Invasion is a structure, not an event.” Wolfe was referring specifically to the British settlement of Australia, but the principle applies equally to the United States and Canada, which were also created by dispossessing the peoples living there when Europeans arrived. That fact is hardly unknown—everyone who grows up in these countries learns about it in elementary school.

What is new in Wolfe’s formula is the idea that this original injustice is being renewed at every moment through various forms of oppression, some obvious, others invisible. The violence involved in a nation’s founding continues to define every aspect of its life, even after centuries—its economic arrangements, environmental practices, gender relations. Because settlement is not a past event but a present structure, every inhabitant of a settler colonial society who is not descended from the original indigenous population is, and always will be, a settler, rather than a legitimate inhabitant.

For the academic discipline of settler colonial studies, the goal of learning about settler colonialism in America and elsewhere is not simply to understand it, as a historian would, but to dismantle it. That process is known as decolonization, and the increasing currency of this term is an index of the rising influence of what might seem a merely academic idea. The command to “decolonize” has become almost faddish; guides have been written on how to decolonize your diet, your bookshelf, your backyard, your corporate board, and much more.

Posted in Australia | Comments Off on Invasion is a structure not an event (8-16-24)

Inculcating An Attitude Of Gratitude & Reverence For The USA (8-15-24)

06:30 The Real Reason for the Rise in Rape – and Why Feminists Won’t Mention It., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Unmz-nuSS_I
11:30 Swoooon! Why is Harris Media Coverage Like This? | Mark Halperin, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0xCB1J0SOk
31:25 95% of journos badly want Trump to lose
33:20 WP: Why the disinformation brigade has utterly failed to weaken Trump, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/08/15/trump-fact-checking-truth-falsehood/
37:00 The Feminisation of Academia – Amy Wax, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhMGU-rExbE
40:00 You want a safe space? Build a family, make friends, join a strongly identifying in-group and hang out there
44:00 My last place finish in a 1984 triathlon, NBC: Last-place (female) finisher in Olympic marathon delivers a first-class Olympic moment | Paris Olympics
54:30 Andrew Schulz – INFAMOUS (2022), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCZkp023MdY
53:00 January 6 comedy
54:00 Andrew Schulz misses Trump as president
1:04:00 Kip joins to praise Louise Perry, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Perry
1:05:45 Animal rescue
1:08:00 At what age should men stop having kids?
1:15:00 It’s not good to fool mother nature
1:19:00 Amy Wax says women experience unwanted sex as dysphoric
1:21:00 WSJ: For Years, an Esteemed Law Professor Seduced Students. Was He Too Important to Fire?, https://www.wsj.com/us-news/education/joshua-wright-student-relationships-c6377572
1:24:00 Amy Wax: Inculcating An Attitude Of Gratitude & Reverence For The USA
Exposing Channel 7’s secrets | Four Corners, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T2y5VbC4WCo
Guardian: ‘I’m not sure Israel is a democratic state any more’: Yair Golan’s mission to save his country, https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/12/im-not-sure-israel-is-a-democratic-state-any-more-yair-golans-mission-to-save-his-country?CMP=oth_b-aplnews_d-1
Guardian: As a former IDF soldier and historian of genocide, I was deeply disturbed by my recent visit to Israel, https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/aug/13/israel-gaza-historian-omer-bartov?CMP=oth_b-aplnews_d-1
Did women in academia cause wokeness?, https://www.noahsnewsletter.com/p/did-women-in-academia-cause-wokeness?r=7bj1z
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/history-of-ugly-laws-america-disability

Posted in America, Feminism, Journalism | Comments Off on Inculcating An Attitude Of Gratitude & Reverence For The USA (8-15-24)