* “The internet is ours,” Benny [Johnson] had said, and he had a point. Jonah and Nick and their editors—Peggy and Anna and Jessica and AJ and I—thought we were inventing digital media, along with all the journalists and writers and techies around us. And yet the figures who would create the new American Far Right had been flickering around the edges of that picture from the start. There, at BuzzFeed’s office in Chinatown, sat Chris Poole, better known as moot—the creator of 4chan. There, hanging out late into the Brooklyn nights with Jezebel’s Tracie Egan, was Vice co-founder Gavin McInnes, who went on to start the pro-Trump militia known as the Proud Boys. There was Andrew Breitbart, mentor to Ben Shapiro and a generation of right-wing online figures, co-founding The Huffington Post . There was Steve Bannon paying us a visit. There was Benny in BuzzFeed’s West Twenty-First Street office, making lists. We’d seen them as the marginal characters in our story; by the time my editor and I were talking this book over in 2022, that picture looked exactly wrong: we seemed to be, he mused, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern in their tragedy.
* Gionet [Baked Alaska] had been subject to the evils that had been denounced at Trump’s social media summit. He’d been deplatformed—thrown off Twitter and Twitch—and had his YouTube videos demonetized. So he was streaming to DLive, a blockchain-based service, when he entered the Capitol on January 6, 2021. He strode around like he owned the place. “America First is inevitable! Fuck globalists, let’s go!” he yelled. At one point he advised other rioters not to damage anything; at another he yelled at a police officer that he was a “fucking oathbreaker, you piece of shit.”
Gionet’s excitement grew as he watched the number of viewers to his livestream rise. It was easy to relate to—it reminded me of that afternoon in April of 2016 when a couple of my colleagues had transfixed the world by putting rubber bands around a watermelon, watching the view count grow above eight hundred thousand, until the fruit exploded. “We’ve got over ten thousand people live, watching, let’s go!” he said excitedly, standing in the trashed office of a senator from Oregon, Jeff Merkley. “Hit that follow button—I appreciate you guys.” His followers excitedly replied, cheering him on to “hang all the congressmen.”
At one point, someone off camera warned that President Trump “would be very upset” with the antics of the rioters. “No, he’ll be happy,” Mr. Gionet responded. “We’re fighting for Trump.”
Later, when it became clear that Trump would not, or could not, protect the rioters, Gionet went briefly underground, posting frantically from short-lived Twitter accounts that he was in hiding. The FBI caught up to him in Houston nine days later, on January 15. The federal court in Washington, DC, didn’t have much sympathy for the rioters, whose actions, the circuit’s chief judge said, had been “reprehensible as offenses against morality, civic virtue, and the rule of law.” Then they fitted him with an ankle monitor and sent him back to Scottsdale. He was not, it turned out, chastened.
On March 31, the ankle bracelet was off and Gionet, awaiting trial, was streaming again. In one video, he films as police arrive to inform him that there have been complaints that he’s harassing people. In another, he picks a fight with a friend, and when the friend slaps the camera out of his hand, Gionet himself calls the police. He leers at an attractive female cop, and does his best to provoke others. And in a video that appears on an unlisted Twitter account, he complains that the federal agents on his case are “fat faggots and dykes,” a piece of information he says he’s learned from the Nazi publication the Daily Stormer. He says he’s been watching a lot of documentaries about violent standoffs between Far Right figures and federal agents at places like Waco and Ruby Ridge.
On June 4, 2021, the federal officer monitoring him before trial dragged him back in front of a federal judge, via videoconference, to demand that he be barred from streaming videos. It was clear from the videos, his pretrial release officer told the court, that he was trying “specifically to agitate, anger, and offend and provoke a violent response to the video during livestream for people to continue to comment.” Then Gionet piped up to clarify. “Calling the cops—that’s a prank,” he explained, before his lawyer cut him off. The judge said he found the videos “inane,” but that Gionet had stayed just on this side of the line and hadn’t violated the conditions of his release. What’s more, Gionet and his lawyer had made a compelling case that streaming on social media was the defendant’s job, and had been ever since he started at BuzzFeed six years earlier.
The court couldn’t take away a man’s ability to feed himself. As Gionet told the judge, “That’s my income.”
Gionet kept streaming, kept playing cat-and-mouse with social media platforms and courts alike, all through the next year. In January of 2022, a Scottsdale judge sentenced him to thirty days in jail for the attack on the bouncer, after prosecutors called him “lost” and a “danger to society.” On May 11, he appeared in federal court to plead guilty on a single misdemeanor charge connected to the attack on the Capitol. But when Gionet told the judge that he was pleading guilty on his lawyers’ advice despite believing “I’m innocent,” the judge rejected his plea. Finally, Gionet relented and pleaded guilty, and, in January of 2023, a federal judge sentenced him to two months in jail. He had “made a mockery of democracy,” Judge Trevor McFadden told the thirty-five-year-old defendant, who had been convicted on the evidence of his own live stream. The judge marveled at how brazen his crimes had been: “You did everything you could to publicize your misconduct.”
Posted inAlt Right|Comments Off on The Baked Alaska Story
In one version, the victim continues to reexperience the traumatic event in nightmares, flashbacks, anxiety, the startle response, and so on, while in the other, he numbs himself to any feelings and withdraws from people in order to avoid being emotionally triggered and overwhelmed. In therapy, the goal is to integrate these two syndromes, helping one patient to contain the anxiety and move away from the trauma, and the other, to confront the trauma and let in some anxiety. Many individuals with PTSD are somewhere in between the two extremes, vacillating from one to the other in an effort to find a resting place.
Ka-Tzetnik had, it appears, struggled mightily to integrate these two positions. We know that after years of suffering silently through his nightmares, his wife finally pleaded with him to seek help. He refused for a long time, explaining that nobody, not even those who had been to Auschwitz, could ever understand him. When his wife heard about a new form of treatment, developed by Dutch physician Jan Bastiaans, at the Center for War Injuries in Leiden, Holland, she again begged Ka-Tzetnik to try it. At last he gave in. He was just about sixty when he arrived in Holland for what he knew was a highly controversial treatment. Bastiaans’s therapy rested on the reasonable-enough assumption that in becoming introverted many survivors created an internal concentration concentration camp, walling themselves off from the healing touch of other people. The more questionable element in his approach was his use of LSD to break down these defenses. Unlike drugs with soothing or numbing effects, LSD tends to sharpen perceptions. It usually precipitates powerful flashbacks from significant events in the past. Bastiaans injected his patients with several rounds of LSD, recorded or videotaped their reactions, and then analyzed them. The idea was to force the patient to reexperience and confront his trauma directly, under supportive medical supervision. Bastiaans received permission to administer his treatment in the 1960s only after several Dutch Holocaust survivors sent a petition to the queen.
During his LSD-induced trances, Ka-Tzetnik experienced the most horrific hallucinations. He saw his mother standing naked with other women on line to the crematorium and then going up in smoke. He saw his sister among the camp prostitutes. He saw a friend from the barracks being beaten to death on his naked buttocks. He saw starving prisoners attacking one of their own after his face was covered with jelly by the guards. Within seconds, a thousand prisoners were licking and biting each other, and when it was all over, Ka-Tzetnik saw the bloody, eaten-away corpse of a friend, surrounded by laughing German guards. And he saw an SS soldier murdering a boy whom he had sexually abused. The soldier then grilled the boy’s body on a skewer and ate it piece by piece.
During a break between trances, Ka-Tzetnik was able for the first time in his life to expose the number on his arm—to a group of German tourists when he was taking a walk on the beach. He later wrote that when one of these tourists, who had strange, elaborate tattoos on his chest and arms, approached Ka-Tzetnik on the beach to examine his simple and therefore more unique tattoo, Ka-Tzetnik suddenly panicked. “A crazed beast was awakening inside me, ready to plunge its fangs into the throat of this creature standing over me. I jumped to my feet, shouting curses, and ran.” 3
In a subsequent trance, Ka-Tzetnik saw himself in an SS uniform, wearing a hat with the skull insignia. He then came to what he considered the major discovery of his treatment: Auschwitz was man-made, and in different circumstances he himself could have been the Nazi murderer, and the Germans, his victims. This insight triggered a horrible sense of guilt and a desperate plea to God: “O Lord, merciful and compassionate Lord, am I the one, the one who created Auschwitz?” 4 This new awareness also apparently cured Ka-Tzetnik of his nightmares—strangely, though logically, by creating a new problem for him. While letting go of his nighttime dreams about the past, he now developed daytime fears about the future. If the Holocaust was indeed man-made, what could man do now when he had the atom bomb at his disposal? He thus began to have tormenting visions about a nuclear holocaust. “Wherever there is humankind, there is Auschwitz,” he later explained. 5 He had gone to Holland demanding an explanation for Auschwitz of the night, he wrote, but where might he go now for an explanation of Auschwitz of the day?
Whatever one makes of this type of treatment, in broad conceptual terms it bears some similarity to contemporary psychoanalytic therapy. Both seek not to eliminate symptoms but rather to replace them with more authentic sufferings, which is what Ka-Tzetnik’s outcome appears to have been. Indeed, as part of the horrific realization that under certain circumstances he, too, could have been a Nazi, Ka-Tzetnik came to see that Auschwitz was not another planet after all. It was very much man’s creation and should therefore not be walled off or delegated to dreams and other works of fiction. It had to be—it was—part of everyday reality. Thus, Ka-Tzetnik and De-Nur were one and the same, not of two different worlds, and with this resolution Ka-Tzetnik terminated his therapy. Dramatically, Ka-Tzetnik’s LSD-induced hallucinations allowed him to leave the “other planet” behind, in Holland, or more accurately, to bring it back into his reality in Israel. He continued to struggle with integrating the two, and it was ten years before he was able to write the story of his treatment, which further reinforced this integrative process.
Posted inHolocaust|Comments Off on The Israeli Mind: How the Israeli National Character Shapes Our World
* “We treat other people the way we treat ourselves.” (Allen Berger)
* “We construct reality to make ourselves feel OK.” (Allen Berger)
* I can do things with great intentions, great effort and great care and still come a cropper if I fail to follow the rules of the people in charge, no matter how inconsequential I find those rules. If I don’t follow the rules of people and institutions that have the ability to hurt me, they will hurt me. I can’t rarely defeat city hall and it is not usually worth trying. My natural instinct is that I am a precious snowflake who doesn’t have the follow the rules. This has not served me. The world doesn’t care about what I think is important. When reality and I go to war, reality always wins.
* I am not responsible for other people’s behavior, but if they are in my life, I usually have some influence over them. If they make a choice, it is 100% on them, but if I make different choices, there is a more than zero chance that they will behave differently.
* Knowing right from wrong is not of much use if you don’t have the power to choose the right. Most of us lack the power to do what is good more than we lack the knowledge.
* “My behavior tells me who I am. The feet never lie.” Your head and your heart are often delusional. How you behave is who you are. How you behave is what you believe. If you want to know the truth about your character, look at how you behave. (HerbK)
* At all times, preach what you believe. Occasionally, use words. (Francis of Assisi, according to legend) We’re always transmitting. Everything we do affects other people.
* If people consistently treat you with disrespect, it is because you are encouraging that (perhaps by being too vulnerable).
* Here are some of the ways that I see people becoming unhinged by the news: (1) They overestimate their ability to change the world. (2) They overestimate the importance of news. (3) They overestimate their ability to understand the news. (4) They are blind to the fictional reality of their hero system. (5) They are blind to their own limitations. (6) They rage against reality. When man and reality conflict, reality always wins. (7) They deepen their pathologies, such as feeling superior to or inferior to others, becoming hopeless and desperate, identifying too strongly with winners or losers in the news, getting their sense of importance from the news, and then feeling desperate to make the news (feeling as if they don’t count if they don’t get on TV). (8) They sell out who they are to gain respectability. (9) They damage what should be most precious to them by making impolitic reactions to the news. (10) They fail to wisely navigate between reactions #8 and #9. Feeling anxious, they either sell ourselves out to get along with others or they ignore the repercussions to their relationships by following their heart.
* To enter into a relationship is to start a countdown on feeling betrayed (meaning, you will inevitably be shocked that the other party has different priorities from what you expect, such as that you are not their top concern at all times).
* Don’t separate yourself from the community. When you watch Chimp Empire, you see the chimps who leave the herd have a hard time. At the same time, recognize that the stronger your in-group identity, the stronger will be your sense of your group’s victimhood. Ties bind and blind (Jonathan Haidt). So when you are with your in-group, think at times about how your side’s behavior and words look to disinterested outsiders.
* In some situations, you will be a concentration camp inmate, and in other situations, you will be a concentration camp guard. The situation will consistently shape you as much or more than your inherent characteristics. So if you want to stay faithful or sober, avoid situations that will endanger you.
* If you get your expectations right, you’ll feel happier and you’ll operate more effectively. One of the best ways to do this is to place people and institutions into their correct genre.
* Live as though everyone knows everything as opposed to trying to get away with as much as possible. (James Burnham) Act and speak as though your words and actions were accurately represented on the front page of the New York Times. This simple test is the best one I know for gauging proper behavior. It’s more powerful than asking what does God want from me (a question I also ask) because the New York Times is more real to me than the invisible non-physical God.
* As soon as you go online, you will feel a tug to be impulsive and to develop an inflated sense of your importance. You will feel tempted to ignore social proprieties (such as discussing dark topics that you would normally avoid in face-to-face interaction). These tendencies, if not successfully resisted, will damage your life. (Virtually You: The Dangerous Powers of the E-Personality)
* The best protection is connection. The best way to survive a layoff or an earthquake or inflation is connection with others near you. The best way to develop conscientiousness (correlates with academic, personal and career success) is to connect. When you take your spouse, your friends, and your boss into your consideration, you make better choices.
* When you think about how your selfishness hurts other people, you sober up and snap back into reality. When you think about people who’ve loved you, you sober up and snap back into reality. When you think about your failures, your transgressions, and your humiliations, you sober up and snap back into reality (though for some people, this will drag them down, so these would be bad things to dwell on).
* It is inevitable that we will constantly compare ourselves to others (and we will find ways to convince ourselves that we are superior to them). We need to do this comparison for information and connection. We need to believe we are more important than we are otherwise we would be crushed by our own insignificance.
* If you quickly and completely confess your wrongdoing, you can overcome most of your mistakes with people.
* If you react to an angry person with empathy, they usually calm down.
* We’re driven to improve our social status, but the more extreme our drive, the more likely we are to step on the toes of other people and they will retaliate.
* A good way of judging one’s importance in a particular profession is how much income you legitimately, legally and ethically derive from it.
* If you bid for someone’s attention, and fail, perhaps try once more, but don’t go beyond that.
* If you must give someone unsolicited advice, do it only once. If you can’t help yourself and you do it again, forgive yourself for being a bloody fool.
* When I have a painful confrontation with someone, I look for where I was at fault.
* When someone criticizes me, I look for where I at fault.
* When someone important to me says something, I look for how they could be right.
* I carry around the people important to me in my heart, and they affect how I conduct myself. If I forget my client’s interests, I lose that client. If I forget my friends’ interests, I lose those friends. I want to live to simultaneously develop the relationships dearest to me, and to pursue what I believe to be right (and these are often in conflict and neither side of the spectrum is where I want to live). Freedom and community are in opposition and I will sacrifice some freedom for community and some community for freedom.
* Living by principles is usually a wonderful thing, but your well-being should also be a principle and sometimes it should be more important to you than abstract values. What other employees will tell you about your job is more likely to be accurate than the employee handbook. The law in effect for you is not the law on the books, it is the law that is enforced. If everyone around you is driving 80 mph in a 65 mph zone, drive 80 mph.
* Just because you don’t like something doesn’t mean you need to be angry about it. Just because I don’t like something does not mean it is not good for me.
* When you avoid things that make you feel uncomfortable, you put yourself in a prison of anxiety and depression.
* Happy successful people tend to be more willing than average to appropriately extend trust.
* If you are not living in reality, your visions will turn into straitjackets.
* We all need more internal power, and the best way to get more power, is to connect with others.
* Loser lose themselves in drama. Producers minimize drama.
* If you can’t get love, you’ll seek attention.
* “Humans belong to multiple hierarchies and tend to value the one in which they rank highest. Consider the mailroom clerk who is also the best player on the company’s softball team. The latter may be emphasized & become a source of considerable self-esteem.”
* We weren’t born yesterday. People did not evolve to be gullible about their welfare. Advertising and propaganda doesn’t change us unless we want to change.
* WSJ: “You’re extremely unlikely to change someone else’s bad behavior. And the more you call that person out, the more likely he is going to get defensive and double down on it.”
* When we encounter things we can’t handle, we will tend to react with fight, flight, freeze or fawn reflexes, which quickly translate into the emotions of anger (fight), fear (flight) or hiding (freeze).
* Humility means accepting reality. Insanity means denying the truth. Sanity means accepting the truth.
* Be who you need to be during the day (subordinate, assistant, cashier, janitor, clerk) but don’t forget who you are (your vision).
* Communication builds on itself just as hiding collapses on itself. Polish here and shine there (The Karate Kid).
* If you have a problem in one area of your life, you have this problem all over your life, you just can’t see it. If you habitually over-eat, you over-indulge in other areas of your life. If you habitually lie in dating, you lie in other areas of your life. If you are nasty with your spouse, you are likely nasty to others as well. If you lie about what you believe and what you practice with your religion, you likely do the same in other areas of your life. If you get panic attacks in elevators, you likely have this problem in other areas of life. If you hide in one area of your life, you hide in many areas of your life. If you can’t control your behavior on social media, you likely have unmanageability in many areas of your life. If you smoke too much or watch too much tv, you overdo other things. If you are vague with your exercise commitment, you likely will be vague in many areas of your life. If people tend to find you annoying in one aspect of your life, you are likely obnoxious in other areas of your life. If you have an instinctive suspicion or hatred of people in authority at work or in your religion, you likely have this baggage with authority elsewhere in your life. If you can’t get over loss in your love life, you will have similar problems elsewhere.
* When you’re losing at life (such as the loss of relationships, status, income, opportunities), you’ll likely retreat into depression (usually an adaptive response where you stop acting habitually, try to learn from your mistakes and plot productive ways forward) or you’ll become reckless and likely compound your problems because you can’t stand losing and you don’t feel you have much of a life to protect. When you’re winning at life, you’ll tend to be protect the precious things you have going, and you’ll make better decisions.
* In most circumstances, if you are aligned with God (Reality), you will feel content and serene. If you don’t feel content and serene, you are not aligned with God. If you are not serene and content, you will hurt other people. We are constantly transmitting who we are to others.
* When you text, you don’t just text words, you also text you. (Dennis Prager)
* If you yearn to help somebody, ask yourself your motivation. Is it coming from a good place or a bad place? If you want to tell a joke, ask yourself if it is because you want to transmit joy or just attention seek? If you are not sure about saying something, ask yourself if it is helpful, is it true, is it necessary, is it timely and am I the one to say it?
* How you do any one thing is likely to provide a window into how you do everything. For example, I could teach 100 valuable Alexander Technique lessons to the same pupil where all he dies is get in and out of a chair. That stimulus of folding and unfolding his limbs will reveal his tension patterns throughout his life.
* “If you love and serve men, you cannot by any hiding or stratagem escape the remuneration.” (Ralph Waldo Emerson)
* What does it mean to put first things first? For me, it means getting clean at the start of the day physically and spiritually. Then I do the most important items in my day in descending order of importance. Another approach to this question is to get clear on what is of secondary importance such as social media or playing video games and make sure I don’t get sidetracked in the first ten hours of my day with nonsense.
* Rushing and multi-tasking are signs to your nervous system that you are not OK. Happiness means loving what you have. Your nervous system’s omnipresent question is — am I safe? Intimacy and purpose are the first things to go when your nervous system gets corrupted [by cell phones, etc]. (Fred Luskin)
* “The action is the success; the results are out of our hands” (Jerrold Mundis).
* Our default emotional state is anxiety. Our protection against this anxiety is connection with people we love. Happiness is the ability to love and be loved. We are programmed for flight, fight or freeze. It’s only when we feel compassion (for ourselves and others) that we are in reality. If you want to get into reality, think about people you love and who have loved you, and feel your gratitude. (Fred Luskin)
* “Most of us have two lives. The life we live, and the unlived life within us. Between the two stands Resistance.” (Steven Pressfield, The War of Art)
* “Saying ‘have a nice day’ or ‘take care’ to a stranger is linked with greater subjective well-being…minimal social interactions with strangers contribute to subjective well-being in everyday life.”
* Transformation begins when we decide that continuing on as we are is intolerable. The pain of not changing outweighs the pain of changing.
* “I USED TO IMAGINE life divided into separate compartments, consisting, for example, of such dual abstractions as pleasure and pain, love and hate, friendship and enmity… As time goes on, these supposedly different worlds draw closer…so that, at last, diversity between them…seems to be almost imperceptible… [N]early all the inhabitants of these outwardly disconnected empires turn out to be tenaciously inter-related; love and hate, friendship and enmity, too…” (A Dance To The Music Of Time, Book Two)
* Fred Luskin: “I see time and again that when hurt people reconnect with their noblest goals they gain an immediate burst of power. Finding your positive intention reconnects you with your goals. The sad truth is, your grievances separated you from your most positive goals through your excessive focus on what went wrong… The biggest drawback to telling grievance stories is they keep us connected in a powerless way with people who have hurt us. When we mull over our past wounds and hurts, we remind ourselves of a part of our life that did not work. Reconnecting with our positive intention reminds us of our goals and enables us to move forward.”
* You can tell if you have processed something if you can talk about it without physiological reactions such as stuttering, voice cracking, flushing, etc. If you can’t talk about something without getting triggered, you haven’t processed it. If you can’t talk about your urges without getting triggered, you haven’t fully recovered. If you still have “triggers”, you haven’t processed and come to terms with you. The intensity of your triggers is inverse to your level of recovery. Triggers are signs you need to work your program. In blunter terms, triggers are bullshit. Step work reduces our unnecessary sensitivities. It make us more resilient.
* A sign of recovery is living an increasingly transparent life.
* “People feel more extroverted, more agreeable, more conscientious, when they are in other places, compared to when they are at home,” she said, while “people feel more disorganized and chaotic when they are at home.” When people spent time in social environments, they also felt more compassionate, open-minded and kind compared to when they were at home. (WSJ)
* You can’t be happy without friends.
* Almost every point of view has its time and place, including “lol nothing matters” which is incredibly fun and liberating when used appropriately.
* “The purpose of life is to discover your gift. The work of life is to develop it. The meaning of life is to give your gift away.” (David Viscott)
* Anger is often adaptive in the moment in that it gives you the strength to deal with a problem. Anger outside of the moment rarely serves you.
* I like this advice:
Always assume five people will watch when you broadcast:
* Your best friend
* Your worst enemy
* Your boss
* Your mother
* A lawyer
* You’re likely to feel great when you wear great clothes.
[P]eople who are more aware of their bodily sensations are better able to make use of their non-conscious knowledge. Mindfulness meditation is one way of enhancing such awareness. The practice has been found to increase sensitivity to internal signals, and even to alter the size and activity of that key brain structure, the insula.
* Even when I’m alone, most of my thinking is stimulated by the most important relationships in my life. Paul wrote:
A major factor in the grad students’ transformation, he concluded, was their experience of intense social engagement around a body of knowledge—the hours they spent advising, debating with, and recounting anecdotes to one another.
* According to this podcast, the dark side of fame includes:
* Difficulty trusting people.
* Has been syndrome (the flame of celebrity always dims)
* Acquired situational narcissism
* The brain gets addicted to a high level of neurological stimulation and hungers for recognition
* People aren’t looking at you, they’re looking through you
* Temptation
Here are the positive sides of fame that I have experienced:
* Free travel;
* Easy money;
* I got more opportunities to do what I was good at;
* I sensed the world opening up to me, I got access to where I wanted access (such as interview subjects);
* I expanded my social circle (making up for the losses of people who turned their back on me because they despised my blogging);
* Successful people in my space treated me like a peer;
* I filled up with energy and I passed that energy on to others;
* My opportunities to do good expanded;
* I had new experiences which prompted me to have new thoughts and feelings that would not have been available otherwise;
* Preferential treatment.
I don’t feel like listing off the dark sides of fame for me. I prefer to focus on the good things in my life.
* Around 2012, I largely stopped regretting the past because I adopted the 12-step maxim of given who I was at the time, I couldn’t have acted differently. I did the best I could with the tools I had. For example, I never chose to be a love addict, a sex addict, a debtor, a co-dependent, and an under-earner. These compulsions were ways I learned to deal with pain, and now I have better techniques for living.
* I look for ways to approach life that make me happy and prosperous, that enable me to get along with other people, and to have a sense of ease with myself, with others, with the universe and with God.
* I like the teaching found in the Alexander Technique that all beliefs are just unnecessary tension. I find that insight useful, though not necessarily true. There are many beliefs that are useful though not necessarily true. I’m happy to play with them.
* I like the idea that everybody should be appreciated in their own genre. That is my recasting of historicism. I want to understand people within their context.
* Not just everybody but every thing has its genre. I look for learning about biology among biologists, for learning about Talmud to Talmud scholars and to learn about history from historians. In general, the smarter and the more accomplished the person, the more seriously I take them.
* There are certain clues for people I do not take seriously. For example, if they base their teachings on their anger or their feelings, if they feel that they run the world, if they believe that there is a magic key to how history or the world works, I immediately dismiss them. If they consistently locate their troubles outside of themselves, I can’t take them seriously. I consider conspiracy theorists cranks and nutters.
* I believe we attract people into our lives and people create the kind of societies that chiefly reflect their genetic code when matched with a particular environment.
* I believe that I am an intellectual gigolo who falls in love with every attractive idea that comes along but stays loyal to none.
* I try to stay aware that I usually do not see the world as it is, but as I am.
* I try not to give my opinions undue weight, because every time I share a heavy one, I then feel compelled to defend it, and I dig myself a hole.
* I don’t know of any moral teaching more valuable than that one should act as if what you are doing and saying will be reported accurately on the front page of the New York Times tomorrow. I guess that’s my principle moral code.
* I think the more integrated your life, the better. The fewer secrets the better. The more honesty the better. I like to ask myself regularly — what am I hiding that should be shared with others? What am I ashamed about? Who do I resent? What am I lying about? What relationships and situations am I in that weigh me down? Do I have unnecessary possessions and tensions? And then I clean house and help others.
Posted inPersonal|Comments Off on My Rules For Life
01:00 Megan Kelly: Media Matters’ Tucker Carlson Videos Are Having No Impact on His Fans, Megyn Kelly and Mark Steyn
02:00 Coach Red Pill Gonzalo Lira arrested in Kharkiv, Ukraine, https://www.thedailybeast.com/gonzalo-lira-red-pill-dating-coach-who-is-accused-of-shilling-for-putin-is-arrested-in-ukraine
09:00 DB: https://www.thedailybeast.com/gonzalo-lira-is-a-pro-putin-shill-in-ukraine-and-a-sleazy-manosphere-dating-coach
22:00 Megan Kelly: Fox News Hemorrhaging Viewers Since Tucker Carlson Was Fired, with the Ruthless Podcast Hosts
33:00 World’s most important paragraph with Mark Steyn
35:20 V: “They Are Lying To You!” – Peter Navarro SLAMS Fox For Trying To Destroy Tucker Carlson
42:25 Abrams: Someone is out to humiliate Tucker Carlson with recent leaks
45:00 Jeffrey Toobin describes Zoom call as ‘disaster in my life’
47:20 Was the Tucker Carlson firing just about power?, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/04/tucker-carlson-fox-news-kevin-mccarthy/
55:20 Tucker Carlson – Oxford AL 5/4/23 Key note Address for the Rainbow Omega Foundation, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2awjaNBpJg
https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2023/05/05/trans-poll-gop-politics-laws/
1:30:00 Newsweek on Tucker’s speech, https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-carlson-reveals-excited-obama-presidency-1798730
1:46:00 Elle: E. Jean Carroll Shares the Most Shocking Advice Questions She has Received
2:19:00 Trump & Tucker Reportedly Scheming To Screw Fox News
2:24:00 Dogma and Heresy | Dr. Marc Shapiro, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzLMRKRFvQs
2:35:30 RIP Otto | Dennis and Julie — Ep. 60, May 1st, 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ve-V7FRgAR8
2:45:00 Dennis Prager is turning 75 in August
2:55:45 Public Conservatism with Dennis and Julie, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZmAu8Rem3I
3:05:00 John Mearsheimer: Is China the Real Winner of Ukraine War?, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yl7goPRw_eE
3:19:45 Step 2, Part 1, with Allen Berger and Thom Rutledge, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fjh-_p3XeTs
Posted inTucker Carlson|Comments Off on WP: Was the Tucker Carlson firing just about power? (5-5-23)
02:00 New Yorker Radio Hour: The Fall of Tucker Carlson, and the Making of Candace Owens, https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/tnyradiohour/episodes/fall-tucker-carlson-and-making-candace-owens
05:00 Megan Kelly: What New Leaked Tucker Videos Show
08:00 NYT: Carlson’s Text That Alarmed Fox Leaders: ‘It’s Not How White Men Fight, https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/02/business/media/tucker-carlson-text-message-white-men.html
33:45 Tucker could be president
38:00 Left and Right have lessons to learn from Covid, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=147662
49:00 Vice’s downfall, https://unherd.com/2023/05/my-part-in-vices-downfall/
55:00 Not how white men fight? https://radixjournal.substack.com/p/its-not-how-white-men-fight
57:50 Hoover: Charles In Charge: God Save the King with Douglas Murray, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faZPQR2t5m8
59:00 How To Romanticize Your Life || Being the Main Character of Your Life, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdsE5vCTaWI
1:05:30 NYT: The Mundane Thrill of ‘Romanticizing Your Life’, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/11/well/mind/romanticize-your-life-tiktok.html
1:12:00 Elliott Blatt calls in to talk about Tucker Carlson
Posted inAmerica|Comments Off on Get Ready For President Tucker (5-3-23)
"This guy knows all the gossip, the ins and outs, the lashon hara of the Orthodox world. He’s an [expert] in... all the inner workings of the Orthodox world." (Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff)
