Support this site! Paypal: lukeisback at gmail.com
"Luke Ford reports all of the 'juicy' quotes, and has been doing it for years." (Marc B. Shapiro)
"This guy knows all the gossip, the ins and outs, the lashon hara of the Orthodox world. He’s an [expert] in... all the inner workings of the Orthodox world." (Rabbi Aaron Rakeffet-Rothkoff)
"This generation's Hillel." (Nathan Cofnas)
"You are like the Howard Stern of the Alt Right." (Frame Game Radio)
Bernie says: You and KMG have been talking about pedophilia in science fiction. What I would point out is that science fiction is kind of like the internet, it’s a free for all. You will find eugenic advocacy in science fiction, racism, homosexuality, absolute monarchies, critiques of democracy, religious fundamentalism, genocide, time travel, incest, coup d’etat, murder, race mixing, aliens, total war, degeneracy, speculations on life extention (including buying a body from brain dead persons), space travel , the most immoral capitalist societies where everything can be bought and sold, slavery, socialism, dictatorships and etc.
If I recall correctly you said if one wants to live in a white community, just pick a white church and then you have a white only community.
The same goes for eugenics. If you read a pro-eugenic science fiction book nobody will call you a racist, or a Nazi or whatever. All you need to say it’s just a book I lent from a friend, nothing to it, or something akin to that.
The point is that you basically have total freedom of speech in science fiction, so people are complaining about not being able say this or that. One solution is to write a short science fiction story or a science fiction novel about what you want to say, and give yourself plausible deniability.
Edward emails: “I’ve done a book called “How to Judge People By What They Look Like’ which brings together the mass of evidence for the accuracy of physiognomy which mostly passed under the radar for fear of offending PC. My book ‘At Our Wits’ End: Why We’re Becoming Less Intelligent and What It Means for the Future’ is the first to present to a popular audience proof that our intelligence is in decline due to dysgenics, feminism, immigration and welfare and our civilization will, therefore, collapse as every other has in its cycle. My book, due out later this year, ‘Race Differences in Ethnocentrism’ looks at why whites are so low in ethnocentrism – key factors are low poverty, low religiousness, dysgenics breeding, large gene pool, immigration, low cousin marriage, high iq, our evolved personality. My book, also due out this year, ‘Churchill’s Headmaster: The Sadist Who Nearly Saved the British Empire’ argues that World War II was totally unnecessary and was entirely Churchill’s fault. His much maligned headmaster was actually an excellent teacher and had the young psychopath Churchill not been withdrawn from his prep school then the Head would likely have broken him down fully into being a gentleman, making him less Narcissistic, meaning no World War II, as Churchill only had to press for the War for financial reasons, underpinned by his psychopathic markers, especially financial profligacy. In other words, a traditional headmaster – who I show has been wrongly maligned by Churchill and assorted Leftists – recruited an intellectually brilliant young white male to preserve the Empire but tragically failed in his mission because Churchill was withdrawn from his school too early and sent to a less traditional school.”
I like researching controversial topics. If someone forcefully insists that a certain area is out of bounds and you’re ‘immoral’ for even contemplating it, then that is where new discoveries are going to lie. I originally read Theology at Durham University, graduating in in 2002, did a PhD in Religious Studies at Aberdeen University, finishing in 2005, and was made Adjunct Professor of the Anthropology of Religion and Finnish Culture at Oulu University in Finland – where I’m based – in 2011. However, I finally plucked up the courage to move into evolutionary psychology, human biological differences and intelligence in 2012 and have never looked back! I have made many discoveries, including:
– Proving that modern-day atheism is caused by mutant genes, the prevalence of which has been increasing in the population since the Industrial Revolution relaxed Natural Selection.
– Proving that sexual selection extends to nationality, with women being sexually attracted to males from higher status nations – hence you see Finnish women marrying British men but Finnish men wedding Estonian women.
– Proving that Western Europe became deeply religious by the Reformation because it had been executing all its criminals since the early Middle Ages.
– Proving that the nature of Islamic societies – and the religion itself – retards IQ in Muslim countries.
– Proving that we are becoming less intelligent due to dysgenic fertility. (All my research is at edwarddutton.wordpress.com).
Here are some excerpts from Edward Dutton’s book How to Judge People by What They Look Like:
* So the General Factor of Personality can be conceptualized as the degree to which a personality is pro-social– in other words, the degree to which someone has the kind of personality type and behaviours that underpin many socially desirable traits, the degree to which someone approximates to the type of person that makes for friendliness, helpfulness, being a ‘good neighbour’. The GFP describes a basic personality dimension, high levels of which may have evolved as an adaptation in complex and stable societies so that people would ‘get along well together’. So a person with high GFP would be sociable, extraverted, concerned with the feelings of others, and self-disciplined in pursuit of socially-approved goals. He’d also have stable emotions, and be open to new ideas (see Rushton & Irwing, 2008)…
* ‘Race’ is employed to refer to what in the animal world would be a subspecies: a breeding population separated from another of the same species long enough to be noticeably evolved to a different environment but not long enough to be unable to have fertile offspring with the other group. In other words, a race is a breeding population that differs genetically from other such populations as a result of geographical isolation, cultural separation, and endogamy, and which shows patterns of genotypic frequency for a number of inter-correlated characteristics compared with other breeding populations. The most obvious manifestations of this are observable differences in physical appearance… It has been clearly demonstrated that humans fall into clear genetic clusters which parallel the ‘races’ of traditional anthropology (see Jensen, 1998). So, it is quite clear that ‘race’ is a biological reality and not some kind of ‘social construct.’
* …there are more genetic differences within breeds of dog than between breeds of dog, but nobody would dismiss as insignificant the differences between a Great Dane and Chihuahua.
* …as intelligence is associated with emotional intelligence, cooperativeness, low self-esteem, a trusting nature, future-orientation, law-abidingness, intellectual curiosity, creativity, leadership ability, having a sense of humour, having a good memory, and even talking speed…
* …females are higher in Extraversion, Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness. They are higher in the aesthetic aspect of Openness-Intellect but they are lower in ‘Intellect’…
* * As adults (though not as children) females seem to score very slightly lower on IQ tests than men, they have worse spatial and mathematical intelligence but better verbal intelligence, and they have a narrower intelligence range (see Irwing, 2013). This means there are more very stupid males, but also more super-intelligent males, which is likely why most scientific geniuses have been male (see Dutton & Charlton, 2015).
Equally, age is a good marker of intelligence and personality. People reach their intelligence peak in early middle age (see Kirasic, 1989). Throughout life they also become more Conscientious, less Neurotic, and more Agreeable (apart from a dip during their teens) (Soto et al., 2011). Clearly, age can be reasonably well inferred from appearance…
* endomorphs were the most extraverted, ectomorphs were the most conscientious and neurotic, and mesomorphs were the least conscientious.
* if someone is obese it can be inferred that they have low intelligence, low Conscientiousness, and high Extraversion. If they are obviously intelligent – this can be reasonably inferred simply from vocabulary, for example – then their obesity is likely to be a function of personality. If they are not especially friendly or gregarious then poor impulse control is a pretty likely candidate. It follows that the person who is ‘slim’ or who has maintained a healthy weight is going to be relatively high in Conscientiousness, low in Extraversion and relatively high in intelligence.
From a personality web site: “Individuals high in extraversion on a career test have a tendency to seek out the company and stimulation of other people. They enjoy engaging with the external world. These individuals thrive on excitement, and are enthusiastic, action-oriented people. They like to be the center of attention in groups.
On the other side of the coin are introverts. These people have less exuberance and energy than extraverts. They are less involved in social activities, and tend to be quiet and keep to themselves. An introvert does not require the external stimulation that extraverts do.”
Shimon emails: Some people seek escapism, others seek exploration. Entertainment is usually about escapism into idealized fantasy, art is about honest delving into difficult truths. And truth isn’t about simple good guys vs bad guys. Even good guys can be deeply flawed, and even bad guys are human, all too human. And Jean de Florette and Manon show this.
Also, the dynamics of power, strategy, and psychology in Jean de Florette has universal implications. The envy and resentment that motivate a farmer isn’t all that different from those feelings inside a tycoon. That is why the stories in the Old Testament still have relevance. Much of them is about goat herders and fathers and son, aka ‘ordinary people’. But the dynamics between father and son, between brother and brother, between husbands and wives, and between master and slave in the ancient texts continue to be relevant because our psychology in the modern world are animated by the same ‘spirits’ and urges. If stories of Jewish goat-herders 1000s yrs ago still tell us something about Jewish oligarchs and globalists today, then the thoughts and feelings that animate Cesar and other charactrers in Jean de Florette can tell us much about our world and how power works. Just like Cesar pulls dirty tricks to destroy others and keep the power, we see same things happening today. Cesars in Big Tech seek to shut off the ‘water’ of information and money. And the notion of ‘incest’ can be used as metaphor. Today’s deep state and big capital are very ‘incestuous’ in that those-in-the-know and those-who-know-whom try to concentrate all the power to themselves. So, finance-media-academia-courts-government all conspire to shut off the metaphorical spring to all of us. Even though the town in Jean de Florette is small, reactionary, and ultra-conservative, the political dynamics of that community is hardly different from globo-PC elite communities. Despite their talk of ‘diversity’ and ‘inclusion’, the elites jealously guard their World of their Own where only those with correct thoughts are tolerated. So, whether it’s a conservative small town excluding outsiders or globo-liberal elite realm excluding crime-thinkers, the structural dynamics of both are quite similar. It’s about ‘keep the water supply to ourselves and leave the rest to die of thirst.’ Look how Big Banks are trying to shut the money supply to dissident people on both the Right and BDS movement. All the financial water is irrigated toward growing flowers for globo-homo stuff. This happens on a national scale. More money flows to Israel while economic sanctions are imposed on Russia, Syria, Iran, or any nation hated by globo-homo elites. US policy is ‘shut off water to syria and just fill it with the sewage of US militarism and support for terrorists’. And even though globo-homo elites may be into race-mixing, their minds and souls are demented because of ideological ‘inbreeding’. Intersectionality is about mating PC with PC with PC with PC to create a monster child where decadence and degeneracy aren’t merely new freedoms but the new morality. At least, decadence in the past was celebrated as decadence. Now, it is enforced as the new morality, even new spirituality. We are supposed to believe that some fat man with a wig is really a ‘woman’ and feel holy about it. The war on James Watson is the result of ideological retardation from too much intellectual incest of likeminded dogmas mated with one another.
Finally, consider the overall arch of Jean de Florette and Manon. We see much that is ‘ordinary’ and ‘everyday’, but it builds into great sadness and tragedy. Cesar, in his rigidity of maintaining the kin, ended up killing his own kin. And today’s Western elites, in their delusion of upholding ‘Western Values'(a very decadent version of it) are only working to murder the real thing. Anyway, Jean de Florette and Manon together work like a puzzle. Each piece in and of itself may be ‘ordinary’ and ‘boring’, but as the pieces begin to fall into place and the bigger picture begins to emerge, we see something greater and sadder.