James Olsen, a therapist that specializes in sex addiction, told The Daily Caller Thursday that the accusations “generally fit within the framework of exhibitionism.”
“For many, the thought of being seen and wanted sexually is erotic and stimulating. This is not always pathological, but when it rises to the level of offense behavior, it gives rise to very serious clinical concerns. Many exposers experience significant struggles with their self-esteem and the search to be seen and wanted has often become a powerful drug for them,” Olsen told TheDC.
“Exposers are often highly compulsive in their sexual behavior and gaining control of their exposing can be difficult, even for those who desperately want to stop,” Olsen continued. “The act of exposing is also highly risky and engaging in such a brazen act tends to result in a massive dose of adrenaline being injected into the blood stream. For some, this sensation adds to their high and when mixed with the other sexually gratifying elements of the behavior, can have the effect of a uniquely intoxicating cocktail of stimulation, anticipation, and excitement.”
Touching on the celebrity status of these accused men, Olsen said: “It is fair to hypothesize that individuals in positions of power and notoriety may be more likely to receive the response they desire than would the average person. Some may comply out of a desire to fulfill their own fantasy of being close with such a person. Others may respond in the way the perpetrator desires out of fear, shock, or a hesitancy to confront a powerful or influential person.”
Former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly and Louis C.K. were both also accused of masturbating while on the phone.
“I have treated many clients who have masturbated while talking on the phone with others, often believing (rightly or wrongly) that the person on the other end was unsuspecting of their sexual activities,” the therapist stated. “This too is a form of sexual assault, in that the other person has not consented to be used for sexual gratification, regardless of their awareness of the activity. The person engaged in masturbation while on the phone with a seemingly unsuspecting person is likely to experience a rush from the experience.”
“They are covertly engaging in sexual activity with the person on the other end of the phone. The risk of being caught is akin to the rush someone might feel from having sex in a public place, but there is more. The close proximity of the person on the other end of the phone can create a faux intimacy that feels gratifying for them in the moment, despite its superficial nature,” Olsen continued.
Posted inAbuse|Comments Off on Therapist Breaks Down Trend Of Celebrities Allegedly Masturbating In Front Of Women
After a month of watching Dov wheel and deal multimillion-dollar real estate, explain the minutiae of two-needle and blind hems, patronize full-service massage parlors before skipping over to an evening of fine kosher dining, and “pleasure” himself eight or so times, I start to wonder when this Twilight Zone marathon is going to be over. We’ve just left a porn shop near Times Square, where he’s planning to open another store, and I’m thinking it’s time to go home. I briefly hesitate as he hails a cab heading downtown, knowing the inevitable rituals of his night are still to, uh, come. Then, as I step into the depths of the backseat, I realize I don’t want this trip to end just yet.
Posted inJews, Sex|Comments Off on ‘Meet Your New Boss’
In my experience, about one woman in 50 at work is hot. But when you see the same woman every day, your attraction to her grows even if you wouldn’t give her a second glance if she were a stranger walking down the street. Only about one woman in 30 over age 20 is hot.
* While a few young workplace women are passable most aren’t that hot. Most of the men being caged up and having sparse outside interests tend to over-estimate the beauty of their female colleagues. And of course the women spend a huge effort getting dolled up for work precisely to pique male interest and to inflict consternation among their female rivals.
Friend of mine at Encorpera went to the company picnic at the local water park. Later he mused “the women all look hot at work but when you see them in a bikini they don’t look so good.”
This latest public outrage over male-on-female harassment needs to include a discussion on female beauty privilege and women’s complicity in instigating bumbling sexual entreaties from their befuddled male co-workers.
* Women dress to excite the envy of other women and attract the attention of alphas. If they attract the attention of betas and below, their unwelcome attention has to be swatted down. What is interesting in what is going on now is that by many measures the male “harassers” meet the alpha test – they are rich, powerful entertainment figures. But physically they are betas and below – fat, balding, etc. Would they be getting ratted out in this way if they were not just rich and powerful but also handsome and attractive (or even just handsome and attractive)? Does their physical repulsiveness outweigh their bank balance in the lizard brains of the women that they hit on?
* The business at my part time weekend job now has cameras covering every nook and cranny of the building interior, at considerable expense. For the simple reason that we once had a female employee who went out of her way to sleep with every married man at that place of business, or shine on every married man she wasn’t attracted to, and then in your face their wives about it while filing sexual harassment charges. I was at work twice when wives came up to confront her.
The reality is that if your business has as many as (as few as?) ten female employees, at least one of them is going to be a grade A sexual predator looking to create as much chaos and harm as possible, to as many people as possible. But of course, we only hold men accountable for their behavior, and that is 100% of why our civilization is collapsing.
* The Jews in the psychotherapy hustle want us to believe that they know more about “mental health” than the rest of us. So what do they tell us to do? Let go of the past, abandon the illusion of the ego and live in the moment, like you see recommended in those one-off magazines for sale in supermarkets about “mindfulness,” “holistic living” and “spirituality.”
But then look at what Jews do when it comes to the things they really care about: They obsess over their history of persecution, they show bruised egos, and they worry constantly about white men organizing into the next Nazi movement and led by a new Hitler.
* Stand up comedians are notorious for swapping “ChuckleF#cker” stories revolving around just what they are able to get away with with both the groupies and possibly struggling female comics.
Combine sexual/erectile dysfunction caused by porn addiction with the access to often willing & troubled groupies and its not hard to imagine the rabbit hole comedians Louis C.K. fall into.
* I remember reading an account by an Elvis groupie of her encounter with Elvis as a teenager. When she was escorted into his hotel room, it was understood that it was for the purpose of sexual relations – this is something he did every night in every city or at least very often. She wasn’t there to discuss her algebra homework with Elvis. So after doing this for a while, you just assume that any female that is alone in hotel room with you is there for sexual purposes like all of the others. We are reading about the 1% of females that objected (retroactively) to what was going on and not the countless others who were fine with it.
* Ground is being broken here. Masturbation is to become “performance art”. Who wouldn’t want to pay to watch Louis CK jerkoff at Avery Fischer Hall? Complementary umbrellas and ponchas provided at the door. Bring the kids and Aunt Gertrude. All proceeds will be donated to Friends of Jewish Jerkoffs. FJJ is the worlds preeminent organizing leading the fight against chronic masturbation in the Jewish community.
Posted inSex|Comments Off on Sexual Harassment At Work
Starting at the age you first become attracted to the opposite sex, men are always attracted to that age female but as men age, the range of women they find attractive expands upward.
Doco: Are All Men Pedophiles examines the ‘pedophilia hysteria’, arguing that in an attempt to protect children, society has begun to isolate men by viewing them all as potential pedophiles. It delves into the history of age-old customs and human development in an attempt to acquire a fresh perspective on this troubling phenomenon.
Directed by Dutch filmmaker Jan-Willem Breure, the film shows that while the modern society strongly condemns pedophiles, biological instinct and the history of various world cultures indicate that human attraction to adolescents is inevitable. Even today, the multi-billion fashion industry continues to sexualise young female models, yet those who act on these instincts are vilified.
The documentary highlights the differences between hebophilia and pedophilia. Hebophilia refers to attraction to children who are undergoing puberty, i.e. from twelve to seventeen years old. Since many people are not aware of the distinction, they talk of pedophilia when in reality they mean hebophilia. Several experts are interviewed, including a psychologist, a neurologist, and even modelling scouts, in order to expound on the meaning of pedophilia and their views concerning age and sexual attraction to teenage girls.
The film features a testimony of a childhood pedophilia victim in order to depict the anguish of sexual abuse by adults on young people. There are also interviews with a non-offending male and an offending female pedophile.
Are All Men Pedophiles is a thought-provoking overview of a divisive and emotive topic. It also exposes the many dangers faced by children and the systematic violation of their rights by societies.
Posted inSex|Comments Off on Are All Men Pedophiles?
I think the allegations against Roy Moore are true. I don’t think they reflect well on him. I don’t think they’re an abomination either. I’d rather someone did this than something gay. I think Roy’s behavior is common. If I were in Alabama, I would still vote for Roy Moore.
I want politicians who will do the best for the country. How they conduct themselves in private is a secondary concern for me.
In multi-racial, multi-cultural America today, my first concern is the preservation and dominance of America’s white majority. Compared to that imperative, who leaders diddle doesn’t matter much to me.
I’m sure Roy Moore has a screw loose. I’m sure Trump does too. Those anti-social instincts could bring them down and bring us down. They also could allow Trump and company to do great things.
All of the women in the Washington Post article claim they were repulsed by what happened. That may well be true. I know that when I remember things from my past, how I feel about them largely depends upon the company I keep. To people who think that what I did was cool, I tend to feel it was cool. To people who think that what happened was horrible, I tend to think it was horrible.
As far as the age of consent is concerned, looking at the issue through a moral lens, I side with Judaism which places the age of consent at age 13 for boys and 12.5 for girls (though I’ve never had any sexual relations with anyone under 18, nor would I). Even if all these allegations against Roy Moore are true, he just did what most men would do if they could (if their morals and circumstances permitted). These behaviors are not remotely pedophilia. I don’t want laws changed to lower the age of consent to 12 or 13, but I see a dramatic moral difference between sex with the pre-pubescent and post-pubescent. Sexual behavior with the pre-pubescent is pedophilia and far more reprehensible than sex with the post-pubescent.
It was common in European and American history for girls to marry at age 12-15…
Loretta Lynn the famous coal miner’s daughter country singer was a mother at 15, a grandmother at 30 and a great grandmother at 45. For all I know she is a great great grandmother at 60.
I don’t know how old any of the husbands (I am assuming they are not unwed mothers) were.
The most likely explanation for Judge Moore hanging out at malls and high school football games is that he did so out of insecurity and sexual inexperience. Most men won’t admit it and most women (Amy Alkon being a notable exception) won’t concede it, but woman (and girls) hold much of the power in the relationship when a man asks a woman out (or when a boy asks a girl out), when a boy initiates sexual foreplay (kissing, petting frottage etc) My suspicion is that Moore was afraid of rejection, afraid of appearing sexually incompetent (and what he did with the fourteen year old sort of confirms my suspicion on this point) and so it eased his concerns when he asked a younger and sexually inexperience girl out. He was less likely to be rejected. But Moore can’t say this, its politically incorrect to even suggest that even a fourteen year old girl hold sexual power over a 30 something district attorney, and so he denies it.
If Moore survives this and is actually elected it is because the voters of Alabama either (1) accept from Moore that it didn’t happen, (2) accept that it happened but it is no big deal or (3) accept that it happened but subscribe to my interpretation of what was motivating Moore to go after a teenager below the age of consent.
I remember a case before the Beit Din of America which Rabbi Michael Broyde lectured about (one Shabbos afternoon in 2008). Two best friends were 55yo. One stayed with the other for a Shabbat. During that Shabbat, the 55yo visitor had consensual sex with his friend’s 14yo daughter. The girl had no problem with what happened. She wanted everyone to ignore it. The father was furious when he found out and consulted his local Orthodox rabbi who advised him to gather his friends and to beat up his buddy, paying particular attention to the organ that sinned. That happened and the guy was left with serious injuries and sued the rabbi. The rabbi was visited by the police and the rabbi said he would be happy to go to court on the matter and no jury would convict him. I think the Beit Din ruled that the beaters should pay the injured party’s medical expenses.
Some of the most vituperative emails I have ever got came in after I made an offhand remark, in one of my monthly NRO diaries, to the effect that very few of us are physically appealing after our salad days, which in the case of women I pegged at ages 15-20. While the storm was raging, biologist Razib Khan over at Gene Expression (forget philosophers, theologians, and even novelists: the only people with interesting things to say about human nature nowadays are the scientists) decided to look up some actual numbers. Reasoning that a rapist is inspired to his passion mainly by the physical attractiveness of his victim, Razib went for rape statistics.
He found a 1992 report (Rape in America: A Report to the Nation) from the National Victim Center showing the age distribution of female rape victims. Sixty percent of the women who reported having been raped were aged 17 or less, divided about equally between women aged 11 to 17 (32 percent) and those under eleven (29 percent). Only six percent were older than
29. When a woman gets past her mid twenties, in fact, her probability of being raped drops off like a continental
shelf. If you histogram the figures, you get a peak around ages 12-14 … which is precisely the age Lolita was at the time of her affair with Humbert Humbert. As Razib noted, my own "15-20" estimate was slightly off. An upper limit of 24 would be more reasonable. The lower limit really doesn’t bear thinking about. (I have a 13-year-old daughter.)
Behind such sad numbers, and in the works of literary geniuses like Vladimir Nabokov, does the reality of human nature lie. It is all too much for our prim, sissified, feminized, swooning, emoting, mealy-mouthed, litigation-whipped, "diversity"-terrorized, race-and-"gender"-panicked society. We shudder and turn away, or write an angry email. The America of 1958, with all its shortcomings, was saltier, wiser, closer to the flesh and the bone and the wet earth, less fearful of itself. (It was also, according to at least one scholarly study, happier.)
One of the first media sensations ever to impinge upon my consciousness was the visit to Britain by rock star Jerry Lee Lewis in May 1958, four months before Lolita’s American debut. This was supposed to be a concert tour, but 22-year-old Jerry had brought his wife Myra along, and the British press got wind of the fact that Myra was only 13. This wasn’t an unusual thing in the South of that time; Jerry himself had first been wed at 15 (when he already had a drinking problem). Myra was
his third wife, and also his second cousin once removed. Back then country people grew up fast and close to their kin. Neither Jerry nor Myra could understand what the fuss was about. He: "I plumb married the girl, didn’t I?" She: "Back home you can marry at 10, if you can find a husband." (This was not true, even in the South, though Myra likely believed it. She also, according to the British press, believed in Santa Claus.) It didn’t help that Jerry’s new record was titled High School Confidential.
How long ago it seems! Nowadays our kids are financially dependent on us into their mid-twenties, and can’t
afford to leave home till they are 35. Marriage at 13? Good grief! And so, while Lolita met with a fair share of disapproval in 1958, and was denounced from many pulpits, I believe its reception would have been much more hostile if it appeared now. It would also have been differently politicized. Back then the complaints
came mostly from social conservatives, who I imagine would disapprove of Lolita just as strongly today. The Left, however, almost unanimously championed the book. Would they still do so? A woman! Who was also a child! Exploited by a man! And both of them from stifled, self-denying bourgeois backgrounds! Oh, that evil Patriarchy! It’s amazing how far this stuff has spread: There is a strong whiff of it in Azar Nafisi’s memoir Reading Lolita in Tehran (whose author went to college in the U.S.A.)
Here you see one of the paradoxes of our strange times. Our women dress like sluts; our kids are taught about buggery in elementary school; "wardrobe malfunctions" expose to prime-time TV viewers body parts customarily covered in public since "the lamented end of the Ancient World B.C." (Humbert); our colleges have coed bathrooms; songs about pimps rise to the top of the pop music charts; yet so far as anything to do with the actual reality of actual human nature is concerned, we are as prim and shockable as a bunch of Quaker schoolmarms. After forty years of lying to ourselves, we are now terrified of the truth. Which is an unhappy thing, because the truth is bearing down on us fast.
What would Vladimir Nabokov say if he could view our present scene? I think he would weep. Political Correctness was only embryonic in the mid-1950s, and Nabokov poked some gentle fun at it in Lolita:
…according to the rules of those American ads where schoolchildren are pictured in a
subtle ratio of races, with one — only one, but as cute as they make them — chocolate-colored round-eyed little lad, almost in the very middle of the front row.
He would have been horrified to see how these silly but harmless and well-intentioned courtesies have swollen into a monstrous dreary tyranny, shutting off whole territories of speech and thought, acting as a sheet anchor to hold back our commercial and intellectual progress, corrupting our constitutional jurisprudence, turning unscrupulous mountebank attorneys into billionaires, and making art like Nabokov’s incomprehensible to millions who, had they been born a few decades earlier, would have gotten from it such unexpected, unimagined delight as I got among the birdsong and bowlines in the Sea Cadets’ hut at Northampton School for Boys 44 years ago.
That we are stupider, coarser, duller, lazier, narrower of mind, more fearful of strangeness, more abject, and more craven than the Americans of 1958 is bad enough. What really shows that our civilization is, and richly deserves to be, on its way out, is that we are less able to savor and love a surpassingly beautiful work of art like Lolita.
Posted inPolitics, Sex|Comments Off on I’m Not Much Concerned With A Politician’s Sex Life