Insane Consequences: How the Mental Health Industry Fails the Mentally Ill (2017)

Posted on December 12, 2024 by Luke Ford

Grok summarizes this book by DJ Jaffe:

Core Argument: Jaffe argues that the mental health industry has largely abandoned the most seriously mentally ill in favor of promoting “mental wellness” among a much larger, less symptomatic population. This shift, he claims, has led to dire consequences for those with severe mental illnesses like schizophrenia and severe bipolar disorder.
Statistics and Consequences: Despite an annual expenditure of $147 billion, Jaffe highlights that approximately 140,000 seriously mentally ill individuals are homeless, and 390,000 are incarcerated. This situation arises because psychiatric hospitals have been closed, and criteria for involuntary commitment have become so narrow that preventive measures are often overlooked, leading to increased public endangerment and suffering among the mentally ill and their families.
Criticism of Policies: Jaffe criticizes policies driven by the mental health industry and government for focusing on less severe mental health issues while neglecting those with serious mental illness. He uses various documents, scientific journals, and personal advocacy experiences spanning thirty years to illustrate how these policies have led to negative outcomes like increased homelessness, incarceration, and violence.
Proposed Reforms: The book suggests a series of reforms aimed at prioritizing treatment for the most seriously ill, advocating for smarter, more compassionate, and affordable approaches that would redirect resources from mental “health” initiatives to mental “illness” treatment. These include better use of existing funds, more appropriate commitment laws, and focusing on those who are most in need rather than the general population.

Posted in Psychiatry | Comments Off on Insane Consequences: How the Mental Health Industry Fails the Mentally Ill (2017)

What is a hero system according to Ernest Becker?

Posted on December 12, 2024 by Luke Ford

Grok says: According to Ernest Becker, a “hero system” is essentially a cultural or societal framework that provides individuals with opportunities to achieve a sense of heroism, which is crucial for managing the fear of mortality and the human need for meaning and self-esteem. Becker describes society itself as a “symbolic action system, a structure of statuses and roles, customs and rules for behavior, designed to serve as a vehicle for earthly heroism.” Each culture has its own unique hero system, characterized by different roles and standards of heroism, from high-profile figures like Churchill or Buddha to everyday heroism like that of a coal miner or a simple priest.

These hero systems are not just about physical bravery but encompass any endeavor that gives individuals a sense of cosmic significance or lasting value beyond their mortal existence. Whether a system is magical, religious, primitive, secular, scientific, or civilized, it serves the same purpose: to allow individuals to earn feelings of “primary value, of cosmic specialness, of ultimate usefulness to creation, of unshakable meaning” by contributing something of perceived lasting worth to society. This could be through tangible creations like buildings or through intangible contributions like raising a family over generations.

Becker argues that these hero systems are fundamentally about denying death; they help individuals to feel they have transcended the mere biological reality of life and death by achieving something that outlives or outshines their own decay. In essence, every society functions as a “religion” in this context, providing myths and roles for people to fulfill their need for heroism, which Becker sees as a central problem of human life, deeply rooted in our nature and the need for self-esteem.

Posted in Ernest Becker | Comments Off on What is a hero system according to Ernest Becker?

Does Kamala Harris have a drinking problem?

Posted on December 12, 2024 by Luke Ford

Grok says:

The question of whether Kamala Harris has a drinking problem has been the subject of various rumors and discussions, particularly during her political campaigns. However, there is no concrete evidence from reputable sources to support these claims.

Rumors and Speculation: Social media and some news outlets have circulated rumors about Harris having a “drinking problem,” often pushed by political adversaries during election times. These claims largely stem from unverified posts and opinions shared on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), where individuals have speculated about her behavior at public events or her manner of speaking during speeches. For instance, some posts on X suggested that her aides manage her schedule to avoid unscripted interactions, hinting at a potential issue with sobriety. However, these are speculative and anecdotal observations rather than factual reports.

Official Statements and Fact Checks: Official responses from Harris’s team or fact-checking organizations have consistently debunked or not confirmed these rumors. A Reuters fact-check in 2020 clarified that a photo purportedly showing Harris inebriated was actually a misleading still from a video where she was congratulating runners at a Thanksgiving event. Similarly, another Reuters article debunked a video claiming to show Harris drunk by confirming it was digitally slowed down. These fact-checks suggest that many of the claims are based on manipulated or misinterpreted media.

Public Appearances and Behavior: Harris’s public appearances, speeches, and interactions have been scrutinized, with critics sometimes interpreting her demeanor or speech patterns as signs of intoxication. However, such interpretations can often be subjective or politically motivated. There’s no consistent pattern of behavior reported by credible sources that would confirm a drinking problem.

Conclusion: Without definitive evidence, any assertion that Kamala Harris has a drinking problem remains speculative and part of political discourse rather than fact. It’s important to approach such claims with caution, recognizing the potential for misinformation in politically charged environments. If there were substantial, verified evidence, it would likely be reported by mainstream, reputable news sources, which has not been the case.

Posted in Kamala Harris | Comments Off on Does Kamala Harris have a drinking problem?

Why did the news media hide Joe Biden’s senility?

Posted on December 12, 2024 by Luke Ford

Grok says:

The topic of whether the news media deliberately hid Joe Biden’s cognitive decline is complex and contentious, with various perspectives offering different interpretations:

Media Coverage and Denial:
Some argue that there was a concerted effort by the media to downplay or ignore signs of Biden’s cognitive decline due to political bias. Critics claim that this was done to protect Biden’s candidacy and presidency, especially in light of his age and the importance of his health in public perception. This perspective is reflected in posts on X where users express frustration over what they perceive as media cover-ups or gaslighting regarding Biden’s mental acuity.

Journalistic Challenges:
On the other hand, journalists and media outlets have faced challenges in reporting on this sensitive topic. Some sources suggest that discussing Biden’s mental fitness was often met with accusations of ageism or political bias. Media outlets have reported on Biden’s age and occasional gaffes, but the extent to which these were framed as signs of senility or simply as part of normal aging varies. A Politico article discusses the media’s role, highlighting that while there wasn’t a complete lack of coverage, the narrative was often nuanced, balancing between concern for his age and acknowledgment of his competence.

Public Perception and Political Strategy:
There’s also a viewpoint that the media’s handling of Biden’s cognitive state was influenced by the broader political landscape, including the stark contrast with Donald Trump’s behavior and controversies. The coverage might have been cautious to not appear partisan, especially given the polarized political climate. Some in the media have argued that focusing too much on Biden’s age could inadvertently aid Trump, leading to a more measured approach in their reporting.

Defense and Justification:
Defenders of the media’s approach argue that age-related gaffes or memory lapses do not necessarily equate to senility or incapacity to govern. Experts cited in various reports emphasize that occasional slips in memory are part of normal aging and not indicative of dementia or significant cognitive decline. Moreover, Biden’s administration has often highlighted his capability and legislative achievements to counter such narratives.

Retrospective Analysis:
After significant public events like debates where Biden’s performance was widely scrutinized, some media retrospectives admitted that perhaps the coverage of Biden’s age and cognitive abilities wasn’t aggressive enough. However, this reflection came with the acknowledgment that the complexities of reporting on such issues involve considerations of fairness, privacy, and the potential impact on democratic processes.

In summary, the narrative around the media’s coverage of Biden’s cognitive health involves a mix of political strategy, journalistic ethics, public perception, and the inherent challenges of reporting on mental health in a high-profile figure. The debate continues with no unanimous agreement on the media’s actions or intentions.

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on Why did the news media hide Joe Biden’s senility?

Explain buffered identity in liberalism

Posted on December 12, 2024 by Luke Ford

Grok says:

Answer
Buffered identity in liberalism refers to a concept developed by philosopher Charles Taylor in his exploration of secularism and modernity, specifically within the framework of his book “A Modern Social Imaginary” and “Sources of the Self.” Here’s a breakdown of the idea:

Definition:
Buffered Identity: This term contrasts with what Taylor calls “porous selves.” A buffered identity is one where the individual experiences a clear distinction between their inner self and the external world. This sense of self is “buffered” or protected from direct influence by external forces like spirits, gods, or societal pressures in a way that was not as pronounced in pre-modern societies.

Key Aspects:
Secularization:
The concept arises with the secularization of society, where the boundary between the self and the world becomes more impermeable. In pre-modern times, people were considered to have “porous” selves, open to cosmic forces, spirits, or divine interventions. In contrast, modern individuals are seen as self-contained, with a clear boundary separating the inner psychological life from external influences.
Individual Autonomy:
Buffered identity supports the liberal value of autonomy. Individuals with buffered identities believe in the capacity for self-governance, making decisions based on personal reason rather than external spiritual or communal dictates. This autonomy is central to liberal philosophy which values personal freedom and choice.
Disenchantment:
This buffering also relates to what Max Weber called the “disenchantment of the world,” where the world loses its magical or mystical qualities. The buffered self navigates a world where natural causes, rather than supernatural ones, explain phenomena.
Privacy and Inner Life:
There’s an emphasis on the development of an inner psychological life, where one’s thoughts, feelings, and beliefs are private domains. This privacy supports the liberal notion of rights to one’s own beliefs, expressions, and lifestyle without undue interference.
Social and Moral Implications:
The buffered self can lead to a more individualistic society but also to a challenge in understanding or empathizing with others whose experiences might be described as more “porous.” It can foster a more atomized society where communal bonds might be weaker, or it can lead to a society where personal freedom is paramount.

Criticism and Reflections:
Critics argue that this buffering might lead to isolation, where individuals are less connected to each other or to a larger communal or cosmic narrative. There’s also a critique that this framework might undervalue or misunderstand cultures or individuals for whom the boundaries between self and world are not as sharp.
Supporters might see it as a necessary evolution for personal freedom and the development of liberal democratic societies where individual rights are respected.

In summary, buffered identity in liberalism is about how modern individuals perceive themselves as separate from external influences, fostering a sense of autonomy, privacy, and a secular approach to life. This concept helps explain shifts in social structures, personal identity, and the moral landscape of liberal societies.

Posted in Philosophy | Comments Off on Explain buffered identity in liberalism