Blame Trump For Brexit?

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Left Wingers on social media and discussion boards are already blaming Donald Trump for The U.K leaving The European Union.

Haters gonna hate.

* They may have a point.

Trump gave Brexit credibility, and now Brexit will give Trump credibility.

Thus are taboos broken.

* Many die-hard Labour supporters must have realized it is now or never to to make a stand against the elites & their open borders/cultmarx agenda. It is a lot easier to vote one way in a referendum than it is to explicitly abandon a political that your family may have supported over several generations (esp since some Labour MPs did support Leave). Still this is a damn good open for a broader ‘wake up’.

* This is Merkel’s doing. Trump haters are insane. I just went to buy breakfast. My Cypriot neighbours were stunned and then happy. They all knew this is down to Merkel’s crazy decision to invite in the entire Muslim world.

* The closer the dominance gap in terms of which tribe controls, the more attentive people become to the importance of preserving their tribal power/protection base. Just ask a southerner. It is only members of a dominant tribe with a large demographic advantage in a region and total control of the political mechanisms who can prioritize virtue signaling over tribal preservation.

* Wow, Obamesty voted down, Brexit voted up, and the Freddie Gray rough riders acquitted. Now this is really an iSteve kind of day.

* I can tell you what my Brit friend has said. It’s not Donald Trump. It was the onslaught of third world immigrants with no end in sight. My friend has a posh retail store in London, and he’s been the victim of strong-arm robbery attempts in his store in broad daylight by African immigrants. His son has been shook down for his wallet and iPhone by African immigrant kids. Again, in upscale areas of London! That would be unheard of 15 years ago.

I guess a lot of Americans are still in a bubble, and don’t understand what being around hard-core third worlders is like on a daily basis. Mexicans aren’t like the Pakis or Liberians who arrive in Britain. They’re twisted by poverty, and stupidity. Where they congregate, you can’t relax. It’s unpleasant, and exhausting. At least your Mexicans know what side their bread is buttered. They want to live amongst you, they don’t stare at you on the street like they wish you would die. Trump has fuck little to do with it he Brexit win. If anything, Brexit will encourage Americans to grow a pair, and elect Trump.

* Well it at least takes the option out of the UK elite’s hand to shove 10% of the EU’s refugees down the throats of the British people. That to me is the main win for them. But it will still require more political will than the British people have to now actually stand up to self-inflicted third world immigration. It wasn’t the EU that forced all those poor Northern cities to be overrun with Pakistanis.

* I’d like to know the breakdown on the vote by ethnicity. Not just percentages of a bloc, but percentages of total votes so that you know not just that immigrants voted heavily to Remain, but how many votes that means.

Also, were the heavy votes in London mostly due to immigrants, but was it also the finance/business people who voted Remain.

* I’m a native Brit based in both the UK and South Africa, and a somewhat chuffed Brexit voter.

I don’t think Trump had significant impact on Brexit vote. Rather that both Brexit and Trump’s popularity are a reflection of the same phenomenon. That is to say a critical mass of us bitter clinger, nativist, racist, Hitleriate, Xenophobes… taking a wrecking ball to our betters.

The establishment reaction to Trump mirrors that against Nigel Farage, and for exactly the same reasons. Though Trump is a far more formidable player and better persuader than Farrage, if not nearly as an adroit, informed debater. Both cause pretty much identical pointing and spluttering by the bien pensantry.

Farage and his party – UKIP alone – caused this vote to happen. Cameron offered the Remain/ Leave vote as a Tory party referendum promise in last year’s general election to head off the threat from UKIP. This was somewhat successful, UKIP only won 1 seat in the election – though it did secure nearly 4 million votes – but these were spread across the land rather than concentrated in constituencies.

Offering this sop was, Cameron thought, a safe bet, as he had a double-lock to make the offer moot political theatrics.

Firstly, Cameron didn’t expect to have to deliver on the election promise, as he expected to be in another coalition government – however the Tories won a narrow overall majority, larely due to UKIP taking votes from the Labour party in the blue-collar North of England. Secondly a year ago EU in/ out polls showed a clear majority for remaining in the EU, and Cameron knew he could apply a full-on establishment fix-up if it did go to the polls.

He could bring a formidable battery of guns to bear, as he had done successfully in the Scottish in/ out referendum. This ‘project fear’ included threats of much woe, including financial market meltdown, compromised state pensions, punitive taxation, healthcare cuts, public service spending and welfare cuts and even war….all credibly backed up incessantly by the mandarins in the Establishment, including the EU, UN, the World Bank, the Bank of England, big businesses, Unions, senior military, other world leaders and of course President – back of the queue – Obama.

However, 3 things happened that Cameron did not expect. Firstly the Tories won an overall majority in last year’s general election, so he had to deliver on his promise or an EU in/out election. Secondly, some senior persuasive heavyweight, patriotic Tories from his own government joined the Outers – specifically Boris Johnson (likely the next Prime Minister) and Michael Gove. Thirdly last Summer the German Chancellor Angela Merkel, unilaterally invited into Europe a million and a half, mainly young male, largely economic Muslim migrants from the middle East and North Africa.

This so much pissed-off many of us primitive backward, thick, xenophobic, racist, don’t know what’s good for us ….natives, that it trumped the effects ‘project fear’. This was exacerbated by the insufferably smug, sanctimonious tone of many remainians, perhaps best epitomised by President Obama’s astonishingly patronising haughty threats.

And we are where we are. That is the short version, it’s a little more complicated in reality, but that’ll do as the gist.

But…. it isn’t over yet. Much could happen during the 2 year negotiation period before the UK actually leaves the EU. But there is no doubt about it, this is an astonishing coup and it has driven all the right people apoplectic with yet further disdain for us backward hicks; which is, I confess not to being really quite pleasant, given I’m not so noble as to be beyond a healthy enjoyment of Schadenfreude.

* It’s not just the migrants, Steve, although they are the rancid icing on the cake.

A commentator on a business channel just put it simply and succinctly: “it’s about teapots and toasters and hairdryers.”

The Brits had just been told they couldn’t use the hairdryers that poof their hair–it was, in the eyes of Brussels’ bureaucrats, too powerful. Same with their toasters and teapots–they didn’t meet the regulations of the bigwigs in Brussels. Daily intrusions into their lives, daily reminders that choices were being taken from them led to their “leave” vote, not just the latest indignity of being told the migrants would “enrich” their lives.

Daily injustices and affronts to freedom led to “Get the hell out of my bathroom and my kitchen! And, btw, if you think we buy that your pronouncements from Brussels are arrived at from some altruistic interest in saving the planet, get your corrupt asses out of our lives.”

In short, if you don’t have choices, you have no freedoms. Finally, the people of a very old Empire Strike Back.

Question: will the people of much younger one do the same? Fingers crossed. Perhaps they have given us courage ….or, perhaps what they have witnesses going on her gave many of them the push they needed.

* Stuck in traffic on the way home this arvo, flicking through the stations, I caught the end of an interview on one of the government owned “yoof” stations here, Triple J. It’s a way way waaaay left station, yet the convo went (paraphrasing):

Q. So why did the English majority vote to leave?

A. Immigration was a big factor, especially north, what with jobs being threatened.

Q. So, basically, racism was a huge factor…

A. Being worried for your job isn’t a racist position, it’s an economic argument as well as stems from cultural concerns.

Q. Basically anti-immigrant attitudes, xenophobia…

A. Some would have been moved by xenophobia but most were concerned for their own security, whether jobs or culturally.

They then moved on to playing some shit-house hip-hop dirge from USA.

This Brexit vote, like the Trumpening, is a harbinger of an awakening in the collective White mind.

Tragedy is though that alt-right really thinks that they will win through democratic process. That reason or rhetoric will persuade and win out in the end. That there will be an end. That all the vested interests will suddenly go “You know what, you make great points. Here, take my power and wealth from me.”

* *Angela Merkel, in her underground bunker, marries her longtime mistress*

* The thing about elites, whether in government or the media, is that they think they know better, because they are usually smarter and better educated than everyone else. So they will push such things as the current immigration policy with no regard for its impact on common people because they do not even feel its effects.

When The People push back as they did yesterday, the elites are stupefied that anyone would ever question them, that’s why the internet if full of elitists calling those that supported Leave “racists”, “uneducated”, “fearful”, etc. It’s surprising they aren’t calling them “EU Deniers” or “Globalism Denialists”. If that level of name calling doesn’t make them feel better, they wheel out the End of the World artillery, as did Felix Salmon today:

http://fusion.net/story/318538/england-brexit-screwed-us-all/

Anyone with a level head can see that this is above all nothing more than the common people signifying loud and clear their opposition to the levels and rates of immigration into the UK. That sentiment is entitled to respect, which it is not getting from the elites. Until the elites get it through their heads that most people do not want this much change, this much “diversity”, this fast, they will continue to throw hysterical fits, and allow the “love everyone” mask to slip, to reveal the petulant and arrogant bullies that they really are. If and when they calm down, then they can negotiate on how to limit the damage, and slow the change.

I only wish the people in the United States had as much of an opportunity to spit out the “Globalism is Good For You” koolaid. And maybe, in November, we will.

* One of the striking things that everyone has pointed out about the Brexit vote was how aligned with age the voting was, with over 55 going 70% for Leave and under 25 going 75% for Remain. This is nothing unusual– we’re used to talking in terms of generation gaps and age-specific economic and cultural interests.

What does seem to me a profound change in the world is the simple fact that the leaders of both major political parties and pretty much everyone respectable in British politics was firmly on the Remain side– ie, on the side of the young. This reminded me strongly of something the French novelist Michel Houellebecq said in his interview with Paris Review this week:

“I am persuaded that feminism is not at the root of political correctness. The actual source is much nastier and dares not speak its name, which is simply hatred for old people. The question of domination between men and women is relatively secondary—important but still secondary—compared to what I tried to capture in this novel, which is that we are now trapped in a world of kids. Old kids. The disappearance of patrimonial transmission means that an old guy today is just a useless ruin. The thing we value most of all is youth, which means that life automatically becomes depressing, because life consists, on the whole, of getting old.”

You could say that the old people voting “Leave” are responding to this depression with meaningless, symbolic nationalism. Or you could say that they recognize that the globalist, EU elite feels deep contempt not only for national identity but for them as aging representatives of vanishing culture. But it seems like a remarkable thing that political respectability has moved from the domain of the old to the young.

* Boris Johnson is a remarkable politician.

He’s gone from being a journalist to member of parliament, to twice mayor of highly europhilic London to convincing nearly every provincial region of England and Wales to vote to leave the EU and thus defenestrating the most successful Tory prime minister since Margaret Thatcher.

Also successfully hung onto his wife despite having a four year affair with one employee from 2000 to 2004 (resulting in two abortions) on the Spectator and fathering another child in 2009 with an arts consultant.

* The Corbyn Out brigade are seizing on the result to do what they would have done anyway i.e. try and get rid of him. Having the IRA to tea after they’ve killed a few MPs is no problem at all for Labour’s fundraisers, but sharing a platform with Hamas is beyond the pale.

So far today I’ve heard him attacked on the radio by two senior Jewish Labour figures, Peter Mandelson and Margaret Hodge, who is calling for a vote of no confidence in him.

Some German minister (Fuchs? not Klaus I trust) was implying that the EU would offer a (deliberately?) really poor trade deal which might be put to a second referendum, in the style of “do you want to stay in the EU or have all your fields ploughed with salt?”.

You tend to think they wouldn’t be so stupid, given that the EU sells more to Britain than it buys from them, but we’ve seen Europe’s leaders happy to take a financial hit to keep the political project going.

Look at what they’ve done to Greece and Spain – and they’ve kept them in.

(Gove’s better than Boris IMHO. Boris is great fun but wholly out for Boris. I wouldn’t put it past him to become PM, announce a Damascene conversion to the “in” camp in 18 months time and call Referendum 2.)

* All those dreaming of a do-over are just in the denial stage of grief. There isn’t going to be another referendum. You know damn well that if it was the other way around, there wouldn’t be another referendum.

Same thing with Scottish independence – the idea is that if you don’t like the answer that you got the 1st time, you keep asking. Once you get the answer that you want, then that’s the final answer for all time.

Leftists feel justified in doing things like this because they know that they are smart and their answer is the right one and others are just too stupid too see it, but the stupid can be brought round to the right side of history if you keep trying. Everyone knows that calling people stupid racists is the best way to persuade them to change their mind.

I’m hoping that Hillary will be able to get all the white men in swing states to vote for her by calling them stupid racists. Democrats are always giving Republicans “helpful advice” about how they need to court the Hispanic vote, so that’s my helpful advice to Hillary.

* There is no difference in the worldview of self-regarded elites – white proles on both sides of the Atlantic need to be led if not cajoled, coerced, and hoodwinked. They’ll never come to the correct conclusion if presented with the relevant information and allowed to speak plainly and honestly and will stand as the obstacle to progress in a free and fair democratic political system. They object to decisions being made before the voting takes place. Why, in America prole whites are throwing a tantrum at the prospect of their demographic displacement!

* 70% or more of Muslims and blacks voted Remain, as you could guess by the electoral geography and exit polls confirm.

* One of the stories of the night was all the safe Labour districts (Rotherham included, voted Labour 52% in the last two MP elections) that voted Leave with huge margins. I am really interested in margins and differentials, paradoxes and contradictions, in fact, it’s partially how I make a living. Many times, it is in the margins and differentials and within the paradox and contradiction that a moral of the story can be learned. I think there’s a lot to be learned from white English voters that vote Labour all the time yet voted Leave, in spite of their official party admonition. It’s also an opportunity for those who are paying attention.

I think these same kind of people in our own country largely fueled the Trump upset.

* This is big. This is very, very, very big. The forces of enlightened, reasoned nationalism have taken a lot of beatings lately, and quite a few near, margin-of-fraud misses. We have finally prevailed, and on the same day as a victory over Obama’s blatantly unconstitutional amnesty. Drink a glass, savor the moment, and get right back to work fighting the neofeudalists.

* It’s been a real hat trick for shitlords kinda day…Brexit wins, Obama’s amnesty defeated, and another cop in the Freddie Gray case found not guilty. The only thing more heartwarming would be seeing Trump rise a few points in the polls.

* I’ve got a great idea for a new BBC series. Robert Hood, a young schoolmaster sacked from his position in Nottingham for refusing to take pork off the menu, makes common cause with a gang of down and out raffies. They establish a base in Sherwood forest. To avoid British gun laws, they become expert with the longbow, and make lightning forays into town to save young white maidens from the muzzie gangs.

* If only the BBC had spent more time calling Britons racist for wanting to leave the EU, this never would have happened.

* Standing by for the WSJ & NYT to tut tut & tisk tisk the Brits for their ‘little England’ petty parochialism & xenophobia. Also expect some shaming from all the usual transnational eggheads esp some big SJW-infected multinationals. There will likely be some short term threats to punish England by relocating offices, banks from London to the continent. Hopefully some nationalists on the continent can draw strength from this victory, and create their own Brexits or radical EU reforms giving border controls. Holland & Denmark would be best able. Watching the UK media tonight, one is reminded of its contrast with the US legacy media: the US media hive is way more pc, condescending, and pablum-peddling than what I watched tonight. It is also that the Leave coalition had many articulate, impressive spokesmen. Compared to UKIP & the euroskeptic wing of the Tory party, the Paul Ryan GOP is a pitiful, mealymouthed, approval-seeking succubus. Trump needs to almost start a new party from scratch.

* The L.A. Times has already weighed in with a buttload of manure: “The quintessential anti-EU voter, an aging unemployed white working-class citizen in northern England, might feel a certain solidarity with a similar Trump voter in rural America.”

In short, it was idiotic, illiterate mouth-breathers who voted for Brexit. First, if they really feel that way one wonders why they work so hard to get the dumbest people to the polls. Second, compare England to Scotland. England has a per capita income of $50,556 and voted overwhelmingly for independence. Scotland has a per capita income of $45,904 and voted to remain.

* A defeat for “Remainia” … and only just in the nick of time. A few more years of open floodgates and that margin of a million might have vanished forever.

Sure, it’s an encouraging win for sanity, but so much damage has been done already. It’s a very dark day when the UK vote to leave is equated with a “polarising vote for hate” for no better reason than reformers wishing to bring some bare minimum common sense into immigration control. And it still won’t change the demographic slide.

Don’t forget that the position leavers have agitated for on immigration is towards nothing more outlandish than an end to the insanity and a move towards a points-based merit system a la Australia/NZ (i.e. they’ve hardly been pushing to seal off the borders). Keep in mind though that that’s the same points-based merit system that has seen NZ and Australia go from predominantly British/Euro stock in the not so distant past to paradises of diversity.

This is the same points-based merit system which has seen NZ go, in 1979, from drawing 8% of migrants from Asia, to 37% in 2015. In 2015, NZ increased its population by one percent off the back of Asian migration alone — i.e. something like the US bringing in 3.5m Asians in a year — and somewhere around 1.5%-2% counting all non-Euro immigrants.

This is the same points-based merit system that is resulting in the NZ Government to conservatively project that the European share of NZ’s population to fall from 67% in 2013 to 56% in 2038.

* This may have been pointed out already on this site, but it seems that the Leave victory is a very direct and significant consequence of Merkel’s Boner. Britain fought two World Wars, bankrupted itself and lost its Empire to avoid domination by Germany. There seems to be a connection between this vote and Merkel’s unilateral actions on Middle Eastern migrants.

Personally, I thought Leave was the right decision but the economic future for the UK will not necessarily be a bed of roses. The UK was stuck in an economic and poltical death spiral in the 1970s until Thatcher took over and it was not easy for her to turn things around. The Common Market and the EU was a great economic boon to the UK.

* “I wonder what the EU could have done differently that would have made British people want to stay.”

Be more pro-European? Ms. Merkel kept announcing that European Values means Europe fills up with Afghans.

* There’s absolutely nothing except fear of repercussions at the polls or on the streets — unlikely scenarios — to prevent Britain’s elites from abrogating the referendum results; legitimately via a Parliamentary vote or illegitimately via some hitherto unknown bureaucratic trick.

But even if the Brits manage to get rid of the EU tar baby there’s still an enormous job ahead for British patriots. It’s past time to implement the policies presciently suggested by Enoch Powell and do as much as possible to repair the damage that has resulted from not implementing those policies over a half-century ago.

A good start would be a complete moratorium on immigration and naturalization followed by policies that permanently remove from the UK any foreign-born troublemakers. Powell’s biggest concern, back in the day, was the conflation of Commonwealth and UK citizenship. This issue urgently needs to be re-addressed and until i is the current policy/philosophy should be held in abeyance.

Once the citizens of EU countries see the Brits control their immigration policy the Brussels bureaucrats are doomed. Eventually national sovereignty will reassert itself and the EU will return to its proper role as a Zollverein, pact for organizing cross-national public works projects, and mutual defense organization.

* This is sort of a “All Hail Dorothy, the Wicked Witch is Dead!” moment.

The Wicked Witch is gone, just a pool of rank, steaming rags on the floor. Deathly silence for a moment as the Earth stops spinning on its axis. and then the leader of the witch’s guard steps forward and with a lusty cry announces the alliance of the formerly-enslaved with their new, naturally-aristocratic leaders.

Thanks, Steve for the stirring rendering of Rule Brittania. For once, a straight version of a Nation’s anthem. No crooning high notes, overly self-conscious, self-promoting bending the song that takes one’s attention away from the subject at hand. And how did all those white people learn to sing so well what with no Negro minstrels around to carry the tune and show them how it’s done? Don’t they know that Negros invented music? And whites are just supposed to awkwardly try and follow along, half a beat behind?

What a magnificent Chorus! When people raise their voices as One. That can only be done when people FEEL as One. A Unity forged in their common history, dreams, suffering and joy.

Lately, I’ve been watching old post WW2 British war movies, and especially enjoy the Navy-themed ones. My God, those British bulldogs were brave lads. They never shirked a fight. Rule the Waves indeed! On land, maybe the Germans consistently bested them, but on the Sea, the British kicked Heinie heinie.

The English people don’t need to be enriched with foreign blood and this referendum shows that they know it.

* The economy of Texas, if it were a nation, would rank twelfth in the world to Mexico’s sixteenth.

Texas would destroy Mexico in an all-out war. Mexico would lose huge chunks of territory.

Bring it on.

* Great Britain just voted for “I don’t care if you call me racist.” Hopefully the U.S. follows suit in November.

Posted in Brexit | Comments Off on Blame Trump For Brexit?

Opinion: On Brexit and the Jews

by David Patrikarakos | 06.16.16 11:40 am

There is an argument to be made that Brexit would be good for the Jews because it would distance them from an increasingly anti-Semitic continent. This argument would be wrong. It will undoubtedly put the whole of European Jewry at greater risk.

For centuries, savage, backwards, reactionary, and violent anti-Semitism was the norm in Europe. The last several decades are the exception. If Britain leaves the EU, this could change. Fringe movements whose main goal is Brexit—like the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP), a conglomeration that contains racists and anti-Semites of all kinds—will be empowered, and their bigoted policies could threaten to become mainstream. These once-marginalized extreme forces, whose advocacy for Brexit is in reality about immigration and hostility to minorities, will have scored a victory of dangerous precedent. And this is a pan-European problem. With one of Europe’s three major nations no longer in the EU, other far-Right, anti-EU, and anti-Semitic forces across the continent, from Marine Le Pen’s Front National in France to Hungary’s Jobbik party, would receive a boost from the example of a leading country’s exit. At its heart, most anti-EU sentiment is populist sentiment, with all the prejudices that this has always carried. Just today, Labour MP Jo Cox, who was campaigning for an “In” vote, was killed by a man who reportedly shouted “Britain First” (an anti-EU far right organization) as he shot and stabbed her. The EU is seen as aloof and unaccountable: run by a small, unelected cabal of (mostly foreign) people that dictates the lives of the ordinary, hardworking man. Sound familiar?

Brexit is something the greatest geopolitical danger facing the EU today, Russian President Vladimir Putin, desperately wants. He sees the EU (as he does NATO) as a serious threat to Russian power and influence. His pervasive funding of anti-EU, far Right parties shows his clear desire to see the union collapse. Putin’s revanchist Russia, which has re-introduced Orthodoxy—with the centuries of anti-Semitism it has carried with it—as a main staple of national identity, bodes ill. A Europe with a more influential Russia would be a more anti-Semitic one.

There are genuine arguments to be made against the EU. It is bloated and in part corrupt, and does infringe on national sovereignty to a degree, though not nearly as much as its critics claim. But it is also a stabilizing force that has kept Europe peaceful, and thus safe for the Jews, for almost half a century. A Europe with a weakened EU would undoubtedly start to fragment politically and socially. This fragmentation would, over time, empower various reactionary forms of nationalism across the continent.

More immediately, Brexit would mean that the UK can no longer be an easy refuge for continental Jews whose lives are far more difficult. The UK has its problems, but it remains the best place in Europe to live as a Jew. In the last year alone, just under a thousand French Jews have arrived in London, fleeing anti-Semitism. Things may well get even worse, and without the EU’s free movement laws, the Jews would be forced to seek asylum or face a points-based entry system.

Then there is the security issue. Jihadist, anti-Semitic murders of the type seen in France and Belgium over the past two years are today’s major security threat. Jewish buildings across Western Europe are now guarded, if not by the army, then by police carrying military-grade weapons. As several leading British intelligence and military chiefs have said publicly, remaining in the EU is the best way to combat Islamist atrocities. Intelligence sharing is vital. Terror is a transnational problem requiring transnational solutions. Brexit would be a hazardous step backwards.

Posted in Brexit | Comments Off on Opinion: On Brexit and the Jews

WP: Suspects charged in Pittsburgh cookout shooting that left 5 dead, led to anchor’s firing

The journalist was fired for being right. The truth is not politically correct. She committed the crime of noticing patterns.

Washington Post: Three months after gunmen descended upon a family barbecue in a Pittsburgh suburb, opening fire on nearly a dozen people with an assault rifle and a handgun in an orchestrated attack, authorities have charged with homicide two men they have suspected nearly all along.

On Thursday, Allegheny County officials announced at a news conference that Cheron Shelton, 29, and Robert Thomas, 27, each face five counts of homicide, six of aggravated assault, six of recklessly endangering another person, conspiracy and criminal homicide of an unborn child.

One of the fatal shooting victims was eight months pregnant…

About two weeks after the March 9 attack, WTAE-TV anchor Wendy Bell, who had covered the shooting and the city of Pittsburgh for nearly 20 years, opined in a post on her professional Facebook page about the profiles of the shooters. At the time, police had not released suspect descriptions or names.

“You needn’t be a criminal profiler to draw a mental sketch of the killers who broke so many hearts two weeks ago Wednesday,” Bell wrote on Facebook, words that were later deleted.

“They are young black men, likely in their teens or in their early 20s. They have multiple siblings from multiple fathers and their mothers work multiple jobs. These boys have been in the system before. They’ve grown up there. They know the police. They’ve been arrested.”

Posted in Blacks, Crime, Journalism | Comments Off on WP: Suspects charged in Pittsburgh cookout shooting that left 5 dead, led to anchor’s firing

Ryan Landry: ‘Is there a single Jewish pundit applauding #Leave?’

Ryan Landry posts: The Brits came through, and if the exit polls are any indication, the old Brits came through and “Leave” won. How much pain and anguish was there last night? Pundits were throwing out “dark days like 1914” or “oh no this is the darkest time since 193X”. Let’s calm down. It was one vote with no set timetable for leaving the EU.

This vote will be something the EU will throw every single trick in the book to delegitimize, force a revote (note age splits) and refuse to implement. I did not think Leave would win and that even if it does, the forces of control will not execute on the plans. Then the EU Road War would change everything. There have been other European nations that voted against centralization but those did not count. The voting continues until the USG empire gets the result it wants. In case you missed the financial news last night, the markets immediately tanked on Leave Wins hints and results. The system will hold people hostage but the system forgot how many people they have impoverished, flooded with 3rd worlders and rubbed it in their faces.

There is one big difference. The EU of 2016 is not the EU that it was in the ’90s or ’00s. The forces that were supporting centralization and running roughshod over people are not as strong. Look at what is happening all over the continent. The Austrians had to rig absentee votes to prevent a win by a “far right”, in reality nationalist, party. Even the brainwashed Germans have witnessed the explosive birth of AfD, which if women ever voted beyond their vaginas might see tremendous gains.

I would be remiss if I did not mention that last night no Jew cheered on the results. Rootless cosmopolitans cry at the slightest threat to their ability to bounce between nations and scam yokels. I need to take that back. There was one: Luke Ford. It might be possible that Luke Ford is the Chosen One of the Chosen people. Thank you Luke.

Nationalism vs. Globalization, decentralization vs. centralization, the battle of sovereignty. Natives vs. Liberal Natives + their 3rd world pets. I was a doubting Thomas. These are fun times.

Posted in Brexit, Jews, Nationalism | Comments Off on Ryan Landry: ‘Is there a single Jewish pundit applauding #Leave?’

‘Graph of Mother Jones mass shooter database by ethnicity’

proxy

Clri0mnUsAABBTf

“Currently awaiting the results in his underground bunker, ready to lead the ground assault on London.”

ClrhngKUsAAvd9m

ClrG6K2XEAEd5Eq

“Feminism Sex Party”

Clrft1IVAAAAqAj

“An overview of today’s Trump article in the Washington Post”

ClratBUUYAA2qDn

Cj96ZziXAAAzcsY

Clr-W8SUsAAEY0h

Posted in Crime, England, Europe, Islam | Comments Off on ‘Graph of Mother Jones mass shooter database by ethnicity’

The Epidemic Of Immigrant Mass Murders

Ann Coulter writes: With the media frantically hiding the content of Donald Trump’s terrorism speech from last week, he should respond to every question with the central point of that speech: How does this kind of immigration make our country better? How does it make the country safer?

Media: Show us your tax returns!

Trump: Show me how our immigration policies are good for the people who already live here.

Media: Tell us why you fired Corey Lewandowski!

Trump: Tell me how our immigration policies are making the country safer for the people who already live here.

Media: How are you going to match Hillary’s corporate fundraising?

Trump: How are our immigration policies helping the people who already live here?

Sooner or later people will say, “That’s a good question—why is this necessary?”

When the Third World immigrants admitted under Sen. Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 Immigration Act—as well as their children—commit mass murder, the government and media tell us it’s a gun problem. Or it’s “our” culture. Or it’s “homophobia.” Or we have to keep admitting millions of Muslims because otherwise the ones already here will REALLY hate us.

Isn’t that extortion? We’ve already admitted millions of Muslim immigrants, but if we don’t take in millions more, the ones we’ve admitted will go on killing sprees?

How did we get in the position where we’re screwed if we’re not in the good graces of the Muslim community? Maybe we should stop doing that.

As any competent health professional will tell you, prevention is always better than a cure. No one says, Go ahead and have sex with that syphilitic whore—we’ve got a cure! You don’t need to worry about a leaky roof—we’ve got mops!

They know that’s not a good argument, which is why the media refuse to tell you what Trump actually said in his terrorism speech.

Like defendants with a losing case being forced to cough up bits of discovery, it took the FBI a week to release a redacted transcript of the Orlando shooter’s 911 call pledging allegiance to ISIS. Even then, the first version came from George Orwell’s Ministry of Truth: “I pledge allegiance to (omitted), may God protect him (in Arabic), on behalf of (omitted).”

That was too much even for Speaker Paul “That’s Not Who We Are” Ryan, prompting the FBI to produce the full version of at least one of Omar’s calls. (It turns out, he wasn’t pledging allegiance to Wayne LaPierre or Phyllis Schlafly.)

To hide the epidemic of immigrant mass murders, all the lists have to include massacres from a time when there weren’t many immigrants here—before Kennedy’s Immigration Act had fully kicked in and overwhelmed our country with the Third World. Fox News ran a chart compiled by Mother Jones magazine that includes mass shootings from the 1980s. Why not the 1960s? Why not include Bonnie and Clyde?

Could we look at mass murders from the last decade?

Those include:

  • 2016: Orlando, Florida, second-generation Afghan immigrant Omar Mateen—49 dead;
  • 2015: San Bernardino, California, first- and second-generation Pakistani immigrants Tashfeen Malik and Syed Farook—14 dead;
  • 2015: Chattanooga, Tennessee, Kuwaiti immigrant Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez—5 dead;
  • 2014: Isla Vista, California, half-Malaysian immigrant from England, Elliot Rodger—6 dead;
  • 2013: The Boston Marathon, Chechen immigrants Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev—4 dead;
  • 2009: Fort Hood, Texas, Palestinian second-generation immigrant Nidal Hasan—13 dead;
  • 2009: Binghamton, New York, Vietnamese immigrant Jiverly Wong—13 dead;
  • 2007: Virginia Tech, South Korean immigrant Seung-Hui Cho—32 dead.

In the same time period, about a half-dozen mass murders were committed by American white men in their own country, where—despite Teddy Kennedy’s best efforts—they far outnumber Vietnamese, Pakistanis and Afghans. Read on.

Posted in America, Ann Coulter | Comments Off on The Epidemic Of Immigrant Mass Murders

“MADE IN USA!” | Donald Trump Rally | Phoenix, AZ | June 18, 2016

0:33 – “Go fucking cook my burrito, bitch!”

Posted in America | Comments Off on “MADE IN USA!” | Donald Trump Rally | Phoenix, AZ | June 18, 2016

The Ten Commandments Of Logic

ClnikKlWQAA7tue

Posted in Ethics | Comments Off on The Ten Commandments Of Logic

Brexit

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Richard Spencer’s White nationalism is a product of the European melting pot of America, but there is no evidence that it is particular or culturally specific enough to be able to create a deep-rooted sense of identity that tugs at the heart in the way that being English or French does. In fact I sometimes wonder whether the ‘white guilt’ religion of white liberals in American society is itself a curious attempt to create a racial identity in a land where whites have lost much of their old European national and regional identities. But whether that is the case or not, it is a mistake to transplant the racial situation of the New World onto Europe, which, while there are paralells, is also quite different.

In reality the EU is bad for whites and bad for European civilisation. One only has to look at the enemies ranged against the Brexit vote–Obama, Merkel, the IMF. It’s like a who’s who of ISteve.

The EU is a Utopian dream, as was the Soviet Union. Totalitarian societies are created by people who, like Merkel with her refugees–’if I can’t do this then this isn’t my Germany’ believe so strongly in the goodness of their own feelings and instincts that it allows them to over-rule any law or restriction that stands in their way. If you accept the logic of the EU then you will probably accept the logic of a one world government and the steamrollering of race, culture, family, and morality that this will carry in its wake by those who will will enfore their rule with ruthless piety. For me a world stripped of all the glorious quirks of human culture for the sake of global capital and leftist religion is a nightmare not a fantasy. It’s like wanting to see all the rainforests and all its natural wonders pulled up and covered in tarmac. I want the globalists to lose, and it can’t come soon enough.

So I’m voting to leave.

* It’s a mistake to transplant the white nationalism of America onto Europe which still has particular ethnic identities which seem to have a depth and emotional pull that ‘whiteness’ has not yet proved itself to have in America. In fact I do wonder if the ‘white guilt’ religion of white American liberals is an attempt to try and fill this void with what amounts to a new basis for a shared sense of history and common future of white Americans.

The EU is a utopian dream just as the soviet union was. Totalitarian societies are created by the kind of leftist idealists who are dangerous because they have such a high regard for their own idealism and moral goodness that it allows them to over-rule any law or restriction because they trust so deeply in the goodness of their own instincts, just like Angela Merkel and her ‘if I can’t do this it’s not the Germany I know’ approach to re-writing German immigration law–the liberal version of the ‘Fuhrer principle’ if you will. Such are the people that govern the EU. If you accept the logic of one-Europe government you will also probably accept the logic of one world government, and the steamrollering of all race, culture, family, religious and moral difference that will come in its wake and which will be enforced with ruthless piety.

So I’m voting to leave to put a spoke in the wheel of international capital and left wing religious utopianism.

* In the EU, crops that were not on a list of approved varieties were forbidden. It takes a considerable amount of money to get a vegetable variety on that list, so anything people aren’t willing to shell out huge amounts of money for cannot be sold.

And when I say “cannot be sold”, I mean that gardening businesses that sold old ‘heirloom’ and open-pollinated varieties were raided by armed men wearing body armor and carrying assault weapons. Because they were selling types of beans and peas and rutabagas that weren’t approved.

These weren’t foreign plants being brought across national borders, these were old and familiar vegetables that had been grown for decades if not centuries and posed no conceivable risk to anyone. All those gardeners were turned into criminals.

I don’t understand why the British thought entering the EU was a good idea, and I have no idea why they’d think leaving wasn’t the obvious choice. They should regain their own sovereignty in all matters, from immigration to what sorts of seeds should be sold, and scrap trying to centrally plan their economy.

* I’ve been expecting all along that Remain would win by a slim majority, similar to the Scottish referendum recently. I am absolutely committed to escaping from the EU, but I just think the referendum was called too soon, before we had achieved significant Parliamentary representation for the Leave camp. Such a vote will always in Britain tend to stick with the status quo, imo, and especially when the leadership hierarchies of all the mainstream political parties are arguing for that.

But I have been pleasantly surprised by the strong showing of the Leave campaigners in the polls. It seems clear they have won the arguments and shifted opinion. It feels like a cruel dangling of hope, though, for me.

Whatever the result though, it ends nothing. The goal was never to have, or to win, a referendum. The objective was always, and remains, to escape from the birthing United States of Europe before we are faced with only the options available to Carolinans and Virginians in 1861. There’s a long way to go from even a reasonably strong Leave victory (55%, say) to actually getting out, when the forces against getting out are so powerful and so entrenched in the business, media and political high ground. A referendum result, of course, is not binding on Parliament. And even then of course, having dealt with the priority threat, we have to face the issues of getting out from under US “influence”……

It won’t be the end, or even the beginning of the end, but it might perhaps be the end of the beginning (to use my favourite political quote yet again).

Much the same applies, of course, to a defeat for the British patriots, if that is the result tomorrow. The fight goes on, because it must go on. There can be no compromise or acceptance of defeat when the very existence of the nation as an independent entity is at stake.

* I would counter that the EU is not only anti-nationalist but also hostile to indigenous Europeans. The machinery of the EU is designed to break down national barriers and blur individual European identities by bringing in non-Europeans and mixing up the different European ethnicities the best they can. I hope that the UK exits the EU and this causes a domino effect where other nations break away until the EU finally crumbles. I don’t see this happening, call me cynical (and I hope I’m wrong), but I think the vote will be rigged. The political elite has a lot riding on this experiment.

A united Europe of course can be a great thing, but this Union is dangerous to Europeans as a whole. Especially with people like Merkel and Junker in charge.

* There is a certain irony, I think, in the fact that mass immigration from outside the EU, in the end, might prove to have been (hopefully) the final downfall of the Eurocrats. (Whichever way this particular vote goes, I think the resurgence of nationalist politics in Europe will hopefully eventually do for the EU project, one way or the other).

Free movement within the EU is a necessary part of their superstate project, but there’s nothing driving their dogmatic (and positively demonic, imo) insistence on backing mass migration from other continents except their own antiracist and internationalist ideologies. British moaning about Poles and central European complaints about gypsies, etc, would in itself probably have been containable. If they’d been a little more pragmatic and cynical (Lord knows, they are certainly cynical enough on other issues and in other ways), they might have gotten away with it.

Perhaps it really was just sheer arrogance.

* I will venture a prediction that the age of cynicism has drawn to a close and we all don’t know it yet. Brexit wins by a comfortable (i.e. unexpectedly large) margin. Global stock markets initially take a big hit but soothing tones emanating from Yellen and Draghi coax them back into the sideways channel that they’ve been plowing through for the last two and a half years. For the time being, and for several months into the future, nothing much else seems to change. There’s a lot of inertia in the system and no one, not even those in favor of the Brexit, know quite how to adjust to the new reality.

Those of us who support Trump should take careful note of this. Trump will win, but initially nothing will seem to change. The effects of these massive, narrative-shifting events will take years to manifest. It will be very difficult for we who are part of these processes to understanding them in the offing, for we ourselves are the events.

And let’s not forget my first (variously formulated) iron rule of sociology: All true social change is fundamentally driven, but fundamentally driven social changes take much longer to eventuate than originally supposed.

* I am a Finnish nationalist. I care more about Finns than I care about other people. And I care more about Europeans (“whites”) than non-Europeans. “Concentric loyalties” I believe is the term.

I certainly don’t want to fill my country with Iraqis, Somalis, or Afghanis, but neither do I want to fill it with immigrants from other European countries. Of course, if it must happen, I’d much rather have European immigrants. But I’d rather not.

Spencer says a lot of stupid shit about the EU and ethnic nationalists (he refers to us as “petty nationalists”). He sounds almost as bad as anti-nationalist open borders advocates. He’s just plain wrong about many things, e.g. saying that the EU has nothing to do with the refugee/immigration disaster, that the nation states are wholly at fault. For one, the so-called “freedom of movement” (i.e. lack of border controls) within the EU is a huge reason for it. The vast majority of the asylum seekers simply wouldn’t be able to reach their desired destinations in Northern Europe without it. We Finns wouldn’t have gotten 32,000+ asylum seekers last year without it. Spencer is just an ignorant armchair general with no skin in the game.

I hope that Brexit happens. It should make the federalists who control the EU less arrogant, less utopian, and less aggressive about pushing their stupidity on Europeans. It’s no panacea, but it’s a step in the right direction.

* 4 observations about from a British born Israeli.

1) Brexit can’t win. Google, Youtube, Facebook and a few others have the ability to influence voter turnout by way more than the margin of victory in the even the most optimistic polls. Given the importance of this referendum to the Cathederal its frankly inconceivable that they won’t exercise this power.

2) This referendum has been useful in distilling the latent divisions in the new politics. Right on millenials have spent the last month repeating IMF propaganda as if it was holy Writ, George Osborne has been calling everyone waysist so much would imagine he was smoking a bong. The Left and the globalists will, of course, try to go back to their phoney “1% way” after this, but it will be much harder after a an orgy of mutual backslapping consisting of ever more lurid attempts to demonstrate their disgust for ordinary indigenous Britons. This of course gives opportunities for a new anti-Left alliance. My preference is that this will take a Misesian free-market form, but, of course, other options are possible.

3) Similarly this referendum has been useful in separating the good from the crap in the alt-right. What a narcissistic twerp Spencer is. The independence of a millenium old country with arguably the greatest cultural heritage in the world is just some “petty” issue getting in the way of realizing his gaylord fantasies. More broadly, I think this demonstrates the real weakness of the WN variant of alt-right thought. White nationalism is both too broad and too rigid. It can’t accommodate “petty” nationalisms that actually mean something to people and so provide a basis for a decent social order, nor can it replace them because it can’t deal with the real issue that people actually quite like having a friendly Hindu running the corner shop and, as such, the basis of national identity, of which shared descent must play a part, must accommodate him too. I suggest, and I’m partly trolling here, that Jewish nationalism is a better model. In principle anyone can join, but its really hard, its you not them who gets to pick, and it’s understood by all that converts don’t make the rules. Now of course, getting to such a model is no easier than just going full white nationalist, arguably even harder, but it’s a more desirable destination.

* If one accepts the reality of the Deep State in Europe and North America as core to the world-wide Anglo-Saxon Empire (the United States, Britain, Australia and their European provinces), then it follows that MI5 and MI6 would be acting to skew the polls and otherwise take action to ensure that Britain continues to serve the interests of the Deep State. Hence, whether Britain stays in or leaves the EU will be determined by the interests of that State. “Facts” are impossible in the short term to prove this hypothesis one way or the other since it is usually years or decades before historians can dig out the facts.

All one has to do is look at the unfolding “real history” of Europe from the height of the British Empire through the post-WWII era as documented by historians to support the hypothesis of the Deep State. Indeed, Britain paved the way for Western industrial countries with the models for a “double” government as well as financialized, mercantile economies — in this case the government for public consumption (Parliament) and the hidden government making strategic economic and foreign policy decisions (the elite-ruled civil service).

* It’s time to leave. The UK participated in, and contributed enormously, to the historic experiment. The results are in and the experiment failed.

Unelected bureaucratic mandarins represented wildly divergent interests from the UK’s. Elected officials from other European countries represented wildly divergent interests from the UK’s. The European experiment denied the British people their fundamental right of democratic participation. It enforced confiscatory taxation on Britons. It literally, not figuratively, initiated a population replacement program of the native British people.

European Union was an enticing, romantic vision. Many, or most of us fell under its heady spell at one time or another. Free trade and free movement of our peoples. Cheap vacations to sunny beaches. Liasons with available, good-looking foreigners in exotic towns and villages. What could possibly go wrong?

Unfortunately, the native common sense of each country’s common people was over-ridden by the base instincts of those cultural and political elites who always find a way to line their own pockets. Those elites never do so without snidely discounting the legitimate fears and concerns of the common people.

A better future for the UK lies ahead. Independence and self-determination will bring political responsibility closer to home and closer to the commons. Local power will enforce political accountability and serve the best interest of the British people.

A representative government is an accountable one. An accountable government is a stronger one. The British will negotiate trade and strategic agreements with every remaining European Union country. None of those countries can afford the luxury of ignoring Britain – the fifth largest economy in the world. Britain will enhance its strategic relations and trade agreements with the Anglosphere – USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand – as well as the fast-growing economies of India with its 125 million English speakers and African nations with 150 million English speakers. Global powers China and Russia will discover a new-found respect for Britain in its independence from the Eurocracy and its strategic solidarity with the Anglosphere. Really, it’s all good. Bring it on. It’s time.

It’s time for the Euro elites and the Eurocrats to thank Britain’s people for all they have given in The Great European Experiment. The blood, sweat and tears of our parents and grandparents who gifted Europe its freedom from tyranny – along with our Anglosphere brothers. The untold amounts of treasure Britain gifted Europe from its Exchequer – paid for with the brilliance, hard work and integrity of its industrious people. Britain’s ongoing and extraordinary contribution to science and technology. The outstanding, shining example of British political and social civility…Really, it’s ok, Europe.

* I am watching the BBC streaming on my PC. Several talking heads are lamenting about the falling Pound. But how many times do markets make large swings over a day or two only to come back to equilibrium in a few days? Does anyone seriously think the Pound’s drop tonight is permanent? I remember when the London subway was bombed and the US market dropped a couple percent. I was able to buy a stock I’d been wanting and within five trading days dumped it for a nice profit. The fear mongering never ends.

Heck if BREXIT wins tonight, then I will win tomorrow. I am sure there will be some buying opportunities tomorrow in the market.

* When the shooting happened there were still at least 6-7 hours of voting left. My (conspiracy) theory is that the German government didn’t want to remind British voters why they needed to get the hell out of the EU. The press seems to have really clamped down on refugee stories lately, probably for much the same reason.

It’s interesting to wonder how lopsided the vote for independence would be if the press and oligarchs didn’t have so many people fooled.

* Some American analysts on Fox Business Net, Stuart Varney and others, are pretty happy about the Exit while their guest, a silly little man who writes for the “Economist,” is quite chagrined. They just told him, “While everyone else was telling them to worry about the survival of the EU, the Brits just told them, “Worried about the EU? Hell, no, we’re worried about ourselves!”

Nice to know the country of Churchill still has it in them.

Posted in England, EU | Comments Off on Brexit

Jews in the West

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Its tough for Jews in the West. Its like being a white Rhodesian. You know you are way smarter than the natives. You are too polite to say so. You know if Mugabe/Trump ever gets in office and you have to leave, everything will go to hell.

You tell the natives (nicely) that the infrastructure is going to crumble, the power plants shut down, the hospitals go dark, the food go unplanted and natives go hungry. Yet they look you in the eye, smile, and say “we know, but we would still rather rule ourselves”. How the hell do you deal with that?

* Please tell me this is satire.

You don’t really think “everything will go to hell” without jews in America, do you? Do you know that there are many European nations with small or almost non-existent jewish populations that haven’t “gone to hell,” or if they have gone to hell it’s solely because of third world immigration? Sweden, Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Norway, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, Switzerland, Italy (the northern part at least), the United Kingdom, Ireland? What about the United States before 1900 when they hadn’t even arrived in large numbers yet? We were doing pretty well. Why else would they show up?

The comparison with Rhodesia is totally foolish. Whites built a civilization for blacks which they couldn’t handle. Whites built a civilization for themselves which the jews invaded. Whites build and Whites maintain.

“You tell the natives (nicely) that the infrastructure is going to crumble, the power plants shut down, the hospitals go dark, the food go unplanted and natives go hungry.”

Wow, just wow. Get this, everybody: If Seth Rogen weren’t here blessing us with his presence, we couldn’t maintain a power plant or a hospital or even harvest crops. Mother of God.

* BTW, if Americans ought to know that so many self-made billionaires are Jewish, shouldn’t they also be told that Jews cured polio, created 95% of popular superheroes, and wrote roughly half of the most popular Christmas songs out there? (oh, and created everyone’s favorite web site, “unz.com”).

For example, I remember some weird Fox News segment about a Jewish mother protesting against Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, but I don’t recall anyone mentioning that Rudolph was created by a Jew, the song was written by a Jew, etc.

* Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud, Trotsky and the Frankfurt School; and BTW David Axelrod, Rahm Emmanuel, Jonathan Gruber and Ben Rhodes. Oh, and the ACLU, the SPLC, the law profession and funding the leftwing idiocy with our money.

We would not mind the disproportionate influence if it wasn’t accompanied by the relentless anti-Americanism, the demonization of whites and shifting the costs of social engineering from your fellows onto the middle class, while simultaneously rent-seeking to make yourselves fabulously wealthy (cf. Larry Ellison).

But when you need someone to arrest the progress of the demons you have summoned – you will find that the well-meaning, honest and virtuous northern European descendants you would have been able to rely upon are sitting on their hands.

Which is really too bad for you. Because it did not have to be this way.

* Tongans were lumped in with “Asia-Pacific Islanders” for decades. When the University of California limited “Asian” enrollment, the smartest “Asians” were accepted. One problem: Tongans are as dumb as a box of rocks. As a result, they never made the cut at UCLA. Koreans and Chinese always beat them out as the “smartest Asians”. So the Tongans asked to be separated out from the “Asia-Pacific Islander” quota group and given their own racial quota. UCLA agreed. It worked. Tongan enrollment jumped.

Europeans are the “dummy” white people … as compared to Jews, anyway. As long as Jews and Europeans are lumped together as “whites”, Europeans are always going to get the short end of the stick. When qualified “whites” have to give up seats at Harvard/Yale/Stanford to make room for lesser-qualified NAMs, it is the Europeans who are going to lose their seats, not Jews. Heck, even the Tongans could figure that out!

It truly is inevitable. Everyone is going to want their own quota category, which Macklin Fleming pointed out in his prescient 1969 letter to Louis Pollack (p. 47):

Think of proportional representation this way: does a US Supreme Court with four out of nine Jewish justices (and no WASPs) really “look like America” (to use SJW quota-speak). Four of nine justices is over two thousand and one hundred percent (2100%) Jewish “overrepresentation”! Yikes!

* Just look at how conservative all those countries with relatively little Jewish political influence turned out to be in comparison to the U.S. (i.e. Canada, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, etc.).

* On immigration policy (i.e., what counts), they’re all way more “conservative” than the US, and long have been. Check demographics for details.

You guys should stop shooting yourselves in the foot on this issue.

I’ll take any of those countries’ demographics and political situation, any day of the week.

* South Africa is a tragedy. It’s the full on “should have picked our own damn cotton” debacle. They could have had a marvelous beautiful white nation there if they’d adopted a very hard “this is our land” policy and chased off the blacks from the get go. Since scattering of blacks who were there decreased substantially with the mfecane, the Boers might have been able to just push ‘em out. But you can’t really do any sort of slavery and still end up your own nation.

When apartheid became unsustainable was the time to be bold and realistic. Falling back to a white state in the Western\Northern Cape would have been the sustainable option. I suppose it was too hard for whites–living well–to give up their homes and businesses and for their community to reverse the Great Trek and all that. But taking the PC, kumbaya singing option means that in the long run they will all have to leave and have no nation at all. Whites can live around blacks when whites are in charge. But anything black run will decay to a level of disorder and dysfunction well below the norms most white people will want to tolerate.

* The proportion of Jews (or half, quarter, eighth Jews) in any position is an irrelevant topic because the Jews want the same policies as the gentile elites for basically the same reasons. If there are fewer Jews (Scandinavia, France) in positions of power or where the Jews lean conservative (Britain) the liberals still win with elite gentile support.

Desegregation would have definitely happened without Jews: The WASPy Earl Warren wanted to force the South to desegregate schools immediately during the Board v Brown implementation hearings in the 1950s. The only reason the South was able to fight against it for another decade was because Frankfurter inserted ‘with all deliberate speed’ into the ruling and against Warren’s initial preferences.

But of course, inconvenient facts such as the liberal WASPy SCOTUS from 1969 to 1994 had no Jews on it and WASPs were half of the liberal wing of the court from 1994 to 2009 never get mentioned by Stevie.

Nor does he ever mention the fact 80% of the Communist revolutionary leadership was gentile – only Jews are held collectively responsible as an ethnic group for their liberalism.

The fact gentiles ruined themselves, and that Jews participated with similarly negative consequences for their community, doesn’t raise tips.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Jews in the West