Luke Ford

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* It is also strange that liberals are doubling and tripling down on muslim immigration while pushing the ideas you just reported. They brag about their smarts, but somehow can’t see how incongruous their positions are. It’s like their only goal is to annoy Christians. So they do all they can to de-Christianize the culture while importing non-Christians. They just can’t seem to connect the dots that they are going to exchange one religion’s norms for another.

* Natural selection is a process by which adaptive genetic traits are selected for over less adaptive traits. Altruism, even of the pathological variety, is genetically influenced like all human traits, behaviors and dispositions. Altruism, in a limited amount, can obviously increase reproductive fitness but at some point it reduces it. While throwing one’s co-ethnics under the bus may be materially advantageous for any given individual and their close descendants, in the long run it tends to be maladaptive. Rodham, as one example of many, may be ensuring a very privileged life for herself and for her near-descendants, but her politics are greatly decreasing the number of her genes that will likely be around in a few centuries.

As a slight tangent, it’s fascinating to note how many people fail to understand than Ann Dunham shared fewer genes with her own son than with any random stranger of her own ethnicity. If one doesn’t believe me, one can easily do one’s own survey. “Would a white parent share more genes with their mulatto child or with a random white person?” People have a hard time conceptualizing that phenotype has a very strong correlation with genotype.

* A high percentage of black students drop out of their first year at college. I wonder how many of the BLM crowd are protesting because they’re overwhelmed by actually having to use their brains in class and are in danger of flunking out?

* I noted on my blog that the peak circulation numbers of the LAT were in 1988, something like 1 million and change newspapers. It has been in decline every year since, and accelerating at that in recent years. And yes Steve is right, editors cannot grasp the connection between demographics and their own paycheck.

Recently the LAT fired TJ Simers who got too old, White, and in ill health (costly), and has bought out nearly all the rest of the older White sports writes including Dwyer, Plashke, and a few others. Simers successfully brought suit against the Times…

As far as polyamory goes, even among the upper classes, female infidelity equals no male commitment. Why should it? Even a bit of normalized female infidelity will have upper class men simply spreading their seed and awaiting paternity tests, sending checks to cover expenses, and that’s it. Which swiftly leads to a collapse of the upper classes as it takes more than money to create successful children to STAY in the upper classes. This is particularly so since the class is related to occupation: being a high priced lawyer, Wall St. Exec, corporate leader, etc. Not ownership of a self-organizing landed estate (which even THAT requires management).

Then you have mass Muslim immigration. The FT has an article by Simon Kuper (a Jew btw) about just how AWESOME Muslims in Paris are and forget all that Jew-killing, don’t believe your lying eyes. And all that racisme! against Muslims must be ferreted out, hopefully with show trials and Puritan like punishments.

Aging upper class harpies who were once hot, and idiot, insulated Jews alike can convince themselves to play on the freeway as they haven’t been killed yet. Stupidity can know few bounds.