Steve Sailer’s Weird Hours

The highlight of my day is when Steve Sailer makes a new blog post, which often happens late at night or in the early morning (I live in Los Angeles).

Steve Sailer writes:

The Internet facilitates jeering from the peanut gallery, which does not make professionals with previously comfortable careers happy. For example, a common joke among mainstream media pundits on Twitter is that the Trump campaign is as if the Comments Section were staging a coup against all that is right and holy.

For example, as far as I can tell from what he’s ever said, Donald Trump is pretty much of a true believer of the conventional wisdom on race. But Establishment Pundits appear to be absolutely terrified that Trump actually is aware of those horrible hatestats that keep appearing in their comments sections. Commenters keep quoting government statistics on crime by race and the like, for example, and Trump might.someday.do.that.too.

Similarly, the profession of psychology has been suffering from a Replication Crisis as many famous findings don’t seem to replicate well. Psychologists do not like being reminded of this, and tend to take mentions of this very personally, as this essay by the past president of the Association for Psychological Science suggests.

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Steve is in the Pacific zone plus as far I know he has to take of his wife (ill) during daylight hours. Doing all his family’s errands in addition to everything else.

* Youtube has just announced their new censorship system for their comments. They call the censors “heroes” and their job will be to flag videos that show thought crime, ahem, I meant hate speech and other such offensive content.

* Susan Fiske is a tenured SJW terrorist (I see her career accomplishments in the social sciences include the always-replicable and wholly-scientific theory of ‘ambivalent sexism’, which will undoubtably be taught to unassuming students via textbook for the next 50+ years and thus further destroy America).

I’m so glad to see that Ms. Fiske, in the spirit of totalitarian and hysterical feminists everywhere, would love nothing more than to censor the Internet and her triggering ‘methodological terrorists’ forevermore.

We’re onto ya, Sue! No more safe spaces!

* I think a big part of the media revolt against the readers is driven by the fact that many of the big foot media types are quite stupid. They are mostly actors today, playing a role that is scripted for them. That’s why they are sounding like comics, talking to one another backstage after a few beers. They hate the fact that have to perform in front of these people.

* Yeah, it’s hard to brainwash people when all your lies can be called out in the comments section. I mean some level of censoring needs to be done. My city has two papers. The comments section of one (the Salt Lake Tribune) is almost 100% leftwing trolls, in a way that does NOT speak well for its readers.

The other (the Mormon Church-owned Deseret News) is ridiculously overcensored in a way that stifles any sort of organic conversation and blocks almost 100% of facts the Mormon Church would prefer for you not to hear. The Deseret News has a full staff of unpaid interns at its disposal – hell, many of its articles are literally written by college sophomores – yet Steve Sailor alone is faster at reading and approving comments. A few years ago a couple of Mormon missionaries were killed when they were run over by a drunk Hispanic man in Texas. They censored any and all comments that pointed out that the perp was an illegal alien.

Newspapers are increasingly concerned about telling you what to think, and comments sections get in the way of that. I will never, ever add a site to my regular reading list that does not allow readers to comment on their output, and quasi-anonymously. It puts pressure on them to stay honest. Hell, I stopped reading NRO when they switched from Disqus to the appalling Facebook comments system.

Posted in Steve Sailer | Comments Off on Steve Sailer’s Weird Hours

WP: New YouTube offensiveness offensive offends users. YouTube disables comments.

Washington Post: YouTube, among others, has tried a variety of tactics, including real-name requirements using Google+, designed to subdue the beast, “flagging” by users to alert its moderators to content for possible removal and an elite corps of “Trusted Flaggers,” which the Google-owned company says “gives users access to more advanced flagging tools as well as periodic feedback, making flagging more effective and efficient.”

All this to modest avail, despite the fact that, as YouTube reports, “over 90 million people have flagged videos on YouTube since 2006 — that’s more than the population of Egypt — and over a third of these people have flagged more than one video.”

So on Thursday it proposed something new, “YouTube Heroes,” essentially a gaming effort to entice users into, among other things, “mass flagging” of offensive content, which would then be reviewed by professionals and removed if warranted. Here’s how it’s supposed to work, according to the YouTube blog post:

YouTube Heroes will have access to a dedicated YouTube Heroes community site that is separate from the main YouTube site, where participants can learn from one another. Through the program, participants will be able to earn points and unlock rewards to help them reach the next level. For example, Level 2 Heroes get access to training through exclusive workshops and Hero hangouts, while Level 3 Heroes who have demonstrated their proficiency will be able to flag multiple videos at a time (something Trusted Flaggers can already do) and help moderate content strictly within the YouTube Heroes Community site.

Posted in Censorship, Youtube | Comments Off on WP: New YouTube offensiveness offensive offends users. YouTube disables comments.

Maryland man instructed others ‘like a coach’ during recorded gang rape

Washington Post: The 35-minute audio recording, as described in a Maryland courtroom Thursday, was horrifying.

“Hold her down,” a young man said.

The voice belonged to Cecil Burrows, 23, who was sentenced to 18 months in jail for his role in what prosecutors described as a gang rape of a nearly comatose woman in a townhouse in the Montgomery County community of Olney. Burrows not only recorded the rape, he called out instructions.

cecil-burrows

Posted in Rape | Comments Off on Maryland man instructed others ‘like a coach’ during recorded gang rape

The Alt-Right And The Death Of Conservatism

The Daily Caller just published an objective essay on the Alt-Right!

Hillary is correct, though, that this new movement from the right has emerged from the fringes of society. All effective counter-cultural movements do. This is where the deplorables all hang out. It is also where the ideas which are forbidden by the leftist establishment emerge, develop and organise. The alt-right does not have a single philosophy. Instead it is a multi-pronged intellectual attack upon the legitimacy of the ruling establishment in the West. This philosophical diversity is key to its strength.

There are several core tenets of alt-right thinking, however, which unify the different factions within the movement. Key to these is realism when it comes to race, gender, culture and beliefs. Despite the histrionics of the leftist establishment, these views have not been considered controversial historically. For everyone except postmodern Cultural Marxists, it is obvious that there are distinct differences between the races and between the sexes. Some cultures are obviously more successful at creating civilisation than others. If it is sexist that women bear the primary responsibility for raising progeny, then biology is sexist. If it is racist that East Asians have higher IQ’s, lower crime rates and higher incomes than Sub-Saharan Africans, then genetics is racist. Even if reality hurts your feelings, it’s still reality.

It has also been true throughout history that humans prefer their own tribe. Leftists today don’t mind ethnic nationalism, as long as it is not whites adopting it. Why is it that Black Lives Matter, a group associated with domestic terrorism who are clearly ethnic nationalists, are feted at the White House while white nationalists are profiled by the authorities and castigated in the media? Why is the demographic displacement of whites through mass immigration and the destruction of white cultures official government policy in Western countries? Why do we lambast this process as cultural genocide when it was done to indigenous peoples but celebrate it as diversity when it is done to whites?

Common across the component factions of the alt-right movement is also the belief that moral relativism and cultural universalism are destroying the West. Emerging over time from a distortion of the Christian principle of universal brotherhood, this practice by Westerners of denying themselves the right to in-group preference has emboldened our historical enemies and convinced them we are weak. Alt-right thinkers understand that all the aircraft carriers and ICBM’s in the world matter little if a society does not have the cultural confidence to assert its values and promote its identity to foreigners inside and outside its borders. Such a demoralized nation is not long for this world.

Many in the emerging right are former libertarians, and retain the views that the state is never to be trusted and that fascism and national socialism were movements of the left, not the right. The traditional right that these reactionary men and women would revive draws its ideas from such thinkers as Thomas Carlyle, Julius Evola, Bertrand de Jouvenel and Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn. They reject majoritarian democracy and advocate formal hierarchy, moral order and the aspiration to higher ideals that metaphysical faith provides societies. They abhor the debased materialism and worship of abstract ideals that characterises modernity. Critics might dismiss this as mere nostalgia; it is not. Instead it is a love for one’s people and the desire to see them be great again. It is more than a political slogan. It is the rekindling of beliefs which many in the West have forgotten.

The alt-right is edgier than conservatism. It is more aggressive and assertive. That’s the point. Right-thinking men and women of the West now have nothing to lose. It is in such circumstances that minds are quickened and hearts are steeled. They see an establishment which is corrupt, degenerate and morally bankrupt. They are not at all interested in conserving it.

Moses Apostaticus is a PhD Candidate (Education) at a major Australian university and is a known voice in the alt-right sphere.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on The Alt-Right And The Death Of Conservatism

Today’s Tip For Goyim

Chaim Amalek writes: Stop saying things like “I wish television and music and the NBA were more friendly to White People”. Such blunt racial talk only marks you as “to be destroyed” by your enemies. Instead, do what we others do and use a special language that can’t so easily be attacked. I suggest you appropriate the language of that group that more than any other, has succeeded in advancing its agenda in America: Torah Yidden. Their word for things, people and places that are most like them and comforting (none of this “diversity” mishigas) is “heimishe”. It literally means “homey” in Yiddish but in fact means “culturally acceptable to Torah observant orthodox as it would have been 100 years ago in the Old Country”. Appropriate it! So now you can say to other goyim “I wish the NBA were more heimishe….I wish TV/celebrities/corporations/TV ads were more heimishe” and everyone in your target audience will know what you mean to say. And unlike you, Goy, your enemies will be at a loss for the right words with which to attack you.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Today’s Tip For Goyim

Sex and the Alexander Technique

Robert Rickover writes:

In my previous post, Sex and the Alexander Technique – Part 1, I provided an overview of what was available on this topic 20 years ago.

Slim pickings, to say the least!

Fortunately for all of us, the situation is a far better today.

To start with, we have a very popular episode at the Alexander Technique Podcast which I did with Alexander Technique teacher Constance Clare-Newman on the topic a few years ago. You can listen to it here:


 

In 2010, The Frisky (sic!) featured an interview with Alexander Technique teacher Rachel Bernsen titled: Frisky Q & A: For Better Sex, Look to the Alexander Technique that received a good deal of attention.

Also in 2010, Alexander Technique teacher Penny O’Connor write a piece titled “Sex and the Alexander Technique” in her blog.

In 2011, Alexander Technique teacher Paige McKinney explored the question “So what about the Alexander Technique and Sex?” in her blog.

Finally, Alexander Technique Chloe Stallibrass, conducted a study titled “Sexuality and the Alexander technique: a study based on a survey of teachers and students at an Alexander training centre in London,” summer 1990.

Posted in Alexander Technique, Sex | Comments Off on Sex and the Alexander Technique

Why Does Keira Knightley Look So Good?

From the blog Just Not Said:

Knightley has made the most of what she has simply by staying thin. Because she’s thin, her eyes are large, her cheekbones are prominent, and her jawline is well-defined. And that’s often what beauty boils down to.

Roughly 75% of people — both men and women — would look good if they were the right weight. That means carving themselves down to perfection.

Posted in Sex | Comments Off on Why Does Keira Knightley Look So Good?

Sociopath alert: Hillary Clinton

From the blog Just Not Said: For a long time, I thought Hillary Clinton a normal person who had been corrupted by her proximity to her sociopathic husband and by having been given so much power. (Power does have a corrupting influence.)

She didn’t seem to have a full complement of sociopathic traits. She lacks the glib salesman’s charm that characterizes so many sociopaths. When Barack Obama characterized her in 2008 as being “likable enough,” that was in fact being generous. Her strident, grating personality does not cast a spell.

It also seemed less likely that Hillary was a sociopath simply because she was married to one. Sociopaths are rarely drawn to each other as spouses: they usually prefer someone they can dominate and manipulate, not an “equal.” But, that marriage appears more and more to be a rare case of two partners in crime.

And ever since Hillary ran for Senator in 2000, she has more or less escaped Bill’s shadow. This has put her own personal qualities in high relief. And it’s hard to escape the conclusion that she, too, is a sociopath.

Dishonesty is one of the main hallmarks of sociopathy.

Hillary has lied, in some way, about practically every aspect of her life that has come to public notice. The bribe she got via the cattle futures trading (which, in all fairness was for her husband, and merely funneled through her) was something she claimed she achieved through having studied the Wall Street Journal. (If she was so good at it, why would this famously money hungry woman suddenly quit trading?) She lied about Travelgate when she claimed that the longtime White House employees had committed embezzlement, which was not true. (Hillary wanted to install her friends in the job.)

Hillary has lied about Benghazi (claiming it was a spontaneous reaction to an internet video), her email setup (which she initially claimed was in accordance with all regulations), and countless other episodes. But these are the types of lies which non sociopaths might utter, if their backs were against the wall and their political survival were dependent on it.

What’s far more telling, personality-wise, is that Hillary lies even when she doesn’t have to. All of the small lies she’s told about her own life have had no impact on policy. But while they seem to matter little, they do speak volumes about Hillary.

Hillary has claimed that she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, the first man to climb Mt. Everest. But she was born in 1947, six years before that event, when Edmund was only an obscure beekeeper in New Zealand.

Hillary has claimed that all four of her grandparents were immigrants. Only one of them was.

Hillary has said that she tried to join the Marines in 1975, but was turned down. While this claim hasn’t been definitively debunked, it seems highly, highly unlikely.

Hillary has famously claimed that as Secretary of State, she once landed in Bosnia under sniper fire, and had to run for cover on the tarmac. No such thing occurred. Here is a CBS clip debunking Hillary’s account, with footage of her actual arrival.

(These last two lies are a little reminiscent of a male sociopath who claims to have been a Navy SEAL, or to have worked for the CIA, when he hasn’t. These types of lies are generally referred to as “stolen valor.”)

Hillary has also famously claimed to have been “dead broke” when she left the White House in 2001.

These are all “sport lies,” a specialty of sociopaths, who will use any occasion to falsely burnish their resume.

Hillary’s lying predates her political career. There are conflicting reports about whether she was technically fired from her job as a young 27-year-old lawyer on the Watergate Committee for her unethical behavior. But her boss at the time, lifelong Democrat Jerry Zeifman, has been quite public about his opinion of her dishonesty.

Another characteristic of sociopaths is that when they lie, they do so straightforwardly, with no hint of shame or embarrassment. Can you think of just one occasion when Hillary came across sheepish, rather than brassy?

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on Sociopath alert: Hillary Clinton

WP: ‘Better-than-ever ‘Transparent’ transitions into a study of American Jewish-ness’

Washington Post: In ways that are both blunt and subtle, attentive viewers of the show now understand “Transparent” as a broader, epic story about the American Jewish experience — particularly as it is lived by a family with an on-again, off-again dependence on faith. Thanks to Ali’s barely formed thesis proposal, “Transparent” has provided profound but easily connected dots along the notion of Jewish escape, flashing back to scenes of the previous generation’s tumultuous yet fortuitous flight from Berlin in the 1930s and the capture of Maura’s uncle, Tante Gittel (born Gershon), a young trans woman.

These scenes were not presented in the name of narrative tidiness or obligations to Holocaust references; they all but announced that “Transparent” is now working less like a dramedy (that word becomes increasingly useless here) and more like an 800-page novel about something bigger than all of us. Season 3 continues to reveal key moments from the past, particularly from Maura’s childhood, but also that of Maura’s ex-wife, Shelly (Judith Light)…

It’s no secret that a lot of these premium-cable and streaming shows are in some way about characters who are Jewish, or at least Jewish-ish, often because these shows are produced and written by people who are simply following the best advice, producing and writing what they know. To have watched some the best half-hour shows of the past 15 or 20 years — anything since “Seinfeld” — is to have become at least conversant in Jewish upbringing, culture and kvetching. We don’t discuss it much in TV criticism, mainly because it sends the worst of our anonymous commenters into the rush-hour lane of anti-Semitism, where the only off-ramp is marked “Hollywood — Controlled by Jews.”

First of all, so what if it is? And secondly, from this goyish, Catholic-schooled viewer’s estimation, “Transparent” is well on its way to becoming a definitive and classic work on the subject of Jewishness as “otherness.” When Maura, from memory, offers the kaddish for a recently departed character, “Transparent” once more reaches a state of sublimity, a feat it somehow accomplishes in just about every episode. There’s more to talk about here than the mystery of gender and relationships. “Transparent” is the best show we have right now about personal identity — of any and all human kinds.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on WP: ‘Better-than-ever ‘Transparent’ transitions into a study of American Jewish-ness’

WP: The untold stories of Japanese war brides

Washington Post: “They are sisters and daughters of the enemies who attacked Pearl Harbor. They married the soldiers who occupied their defeated country and came to the United States. And then? They disappeared into America.”

Women have fewer tribal and national loyalties than men.

Posted in Feminism, Nationalism | Comments Off on WP: The untold stories of Japanese war brides