A girl grows up in Sunnyside, Queens, and looks west. The Queensboro Bridge runs over the East River toward the city she wants. Behind her sit the brick courtyards of the garden blocks, the el train above the avenue, the candy store on the corner. Across the water stand the towers where the actors work and the writers work and the agencies keep their offices. She decides she will cross.
Laurie Graff (b. May 25, 1956) was born in New York City and raised in that borough across the river from the life she meant to lead. She has called herself a lifelong New Yorker, and the claim does real work in her biography. The city becomes her home and her material. Its neighborhoods, its restaurants, its theaters, and its dating culture run through her fiction as forces that drive what her characters want and whom they love and how they fail.
She crosses the bridge first as a performer. Before the novels come the stage years. Graff works for years as a professional actress. She plays Frenchy in Grease on Broadway and tours the country with the show. She appears off-Broadway and in regional houses, in Laughter on the 23rd Floor and In the Boom Boom Room, and in a long run of television commercials. She later plays herself in the documentary Mr. Right, a film about how New Yorkers date. The stage trains her ear. She learns where a laugh sits in a line and how long to hold before the next one.
Picture a stage door in a city that is not New York. The cast comes off after the second act of Grease. The pink jackets, the wigs, the smell of hairspray and sweat. A stage manager calls the next house. Frenchy counts the laughs from the diner scene and knows the timing held. An actress learns her craft this way, night after night, in front of strangers who paid to be pleased. The lesson stays with her when she sits down to write. A scene has to land.
Graff also works on the other side of performance, in publicity and advertising. She takes jobs as a corporate publicist and a freelance copywriter for Manhattan agencies. She runs campaigns. She writes the words that sell other people’s products and other people’s images. The work teaches her how a public face gets built and what sits behind it. Her novels later fill with publicists and communications women who know how to manage a room and cannot manage their own hearts.
Consider the agency floor in the late afternoon. A young publicist holds a phone against her shoulder and pitches a client to a reporter who has heard the pitch before. Down the hall a creative director reads her copy and crosses out half of it. She smiles when he hands it back and rewrites it on the train home. To the reporter she is confident. To the creative director she is competent. To herself, on the train, she is a woman who wants something the job will not give her. Graff watches women like this, and she becomes one, and later she writes them.
The breakthrough comes in 2004 with You Have to Kiss a Lot of Frogs. The novel follows Karr, a Manhattan publicist who succeeds at work and fails at love, and it turns her search into a long comedy of modern dating. The book sells well. Publishers translate it into several languages and option it for film. Readers take to its fast talk, its self-deprecation, its picture of single life in the city. Under the comedy runs a harder question. The plans people make about love and work and adulthood meet a reality that will not cooperate.
She returns to the characters in Looking for Mr. Goodfrog (2006). The second book picks up after the place where romantic comedy usually stops. There is no wedding to settle the matter. Graff looks instead at the work that intimacy asks of people once the chase ends. Across her fiction, maturity stays unfinished work.
Her third novel, The Shiksa Syndrome, shows a single Jewish woman, worn down by the dating market, passing as a gentile to attract the kind of Jewish man who seems to want only gentile women. The premise lets Graff work through assimilation, faith, family pressure, and romantic fear while she keeps her sympathy for everyone on the page. She uses comedy to ask who belongs and how a person comes to accept herself.
Graff writes about the distance between the face a person shows and the fear a person hides. Her women are accomplished. They run careers and friendships and family duties and the strain of intimacy. She does not hand them fairy tales. She gives them negotiations, and she lets a comic misunderstanding open onto something true.
The theater shaped her sentences. Her dialogue moves at the speed of stage talk, and many of her scenes play like short comic turns with a beginning and a button. She leans on the exchange rather than the description. She gives her minor characters real voices, so a doorman or a mother or a friend can take a page and own it.
Graff built a second body of work for the stage. She has long served as a company artist at WorkShop Theater Company in New York, where her one-act plays have gone up over many seasons. Her plays include Charlie & Flo, Love in the Time of Recession, All My Problems, At the Hotel Texas, and The Incredible Egg. She has written book and lyrics for musical workshops in the city’s fringe houses. Her plays appear in anthologies such as The Best Ten-Minute Plays and New Monologues for Women by Women. The stage and the page hold equal weight in her career.
She has placed essays and short pieces in anthologies and periodicals, among them Scenes from a Holiday, It’s a Wonderful Lie, No Kidding, and Live Alone and Like It, along with the “Complaint Box” column in The New York Times. The short work keeps her recurring subjects close at hand: dating, the single life, the small comic frustrations of a day in the city.
Teaching has grown into a larger part of her life. She leads workshops on creative writing and storytelling around New York. She draws on the stage and on the publishing years to teach dialogue, pace, character, and comic timing. The classroom runs on the same conviction as her fiction. Voice carries the work.
After years given mostly to plays, Graff has come back to long fiction. Her musical The Pet Project, set in a pet bereavement support group, has been in development with Transport Group in New York, and it shows her old habit of putting comedy next to grief. Her fourth novel, Til Dog Do Us Part, is set for publication in March 2027 from Rowan Prose Publishing. The book is her first new novel in close to two decades. It keeps her blend of romantic comedy and close New York observation and turns toward the bond between people and their dogs.
Graff’s novels catch the rhythm and the worry of New York dating in the first years of the new century, and they reach past that moment toward older questions about identity and belonging and friendship and the search for a self. She works in three traditions at once: romantic comedy, the theater, and the close observation of the city. She balances the laugh against the ache. Beneath the comic trouble of modern love, her books keep asking how a woman builds a lasting tie and finds a place to stand.
The Held Beat
A woman reads to a room of women. The bookstore has folding chairs and a card table stacked with hardcovers and a clerk by the register who counts the house at forty, maybe forty-five. The author stands at a music stand and reads a passage about a bad date. She knows where the laugh sits. She has known since she was twenty and counting laughs from the diner scene in Grease eight shows a week. She comes to the line and holds. One beat. Two. The room breaks, and the laugh rolls up from the folding chairs, and for that second nobody in it is alone.
In row three a woman near fifty does not laugh on the line. She laughs a half second late, after she looks around and sees the others go first. She came alone. She will leave alone. She bought the book because the title named her life and made it sound survivable. When the laugh comes she joins it, and the joining is the point.
This is the work. Laurie Graff has spent a life building rooms like this one, ninety-minute rooms and three-hundred-page rooms where the single life and the closed door and the man who does not call become, for the length of the visit, funny. Ernest Becker (1924-1973) might call the room a hero system in miniature.
Becker’s argument in The Denial of Death (1973) runs like this. A man knows he will die, and the knowledge is unbearable, so every culture hands him a hero system, a set of roles and values that lets him feel he counts beyond his animal span. The hero system answers two terrors at once. The first is death, the body and the worms. The second runs deeper, the dread that a man is an accident who leaves no mark, that he does not signify. A culture that works tells him how to count past his own death. It tells him which things are sacred.
For Graff the sacred thing is the laugh. The trouble with a sacred word is that it does not hold still. The laugh means one thing to her and another thing to everyone who has built a different life around it. Becker’s point lives in that gap. A value feels absolute from inside a hero system and turns local the moment you step into the next one.
Watch the same word travel.
A hospice nurse on the night shift sits with a man whose lungs are filling. She gets him to laugh about the hospital food, and his shoulders drop an inch, and he keeps his face for one more hour. “You still got jokes,” she says. To her the laugh is mercy. It belongs to the dying, not the living, and she rations it like morphine.
A badchan climbs onto a chair at a Williamsburg wedding. Torah commands joy at a wedding, and his job is to make the joy. He rhymes the bride’s virtues and mocks the groom, and he makes the bride weep for the grandmother who did not live to see the night before he turns the room. To him the laugh is liturgy, a duty owed to God and to the couple under the canopy. A wedding without it fails a commandment.
A stand-up works the late set at a club off Sunset, two drink minimum, eleven people in a room built for ninety. He counts laughs per minute the way a pitcher counts strikes. When the set lands he tells the other comics he murdered. When it dies he says he died. The verbs are not loose. To the comic the laugh is the kill, the proof he exists, and the dead room is the small forecast of the end he spends his life outrunning.
In a Moscow kitchen in the 1970s a refusenik tells a joke about the General Secretary, and the joke passes hand to hand down the table, low, with the radio turned up to cover it. To these men the laugh is the one thing the state cannot confiscate. The joke is a small free country in the mouth. They laugh quietly and mean it more than the people on the Sunset stage will ever mean anything.
In a glass conference room a culture consultant presents a slide. The company wants to be a fun place to work. There will be a Friday game and a whimsy budget and an engagement score. To her the laugh is a number on a dashboard, and the funny dies at the moment it becomes a key result, though no one in the room can say so.
In a trauma bay at three in the morning an attending and two residents work a body that is not going to make it, and one of them says the thing that makes the others laugh over the chest compressions, and the laugh keeps the team in the room and at the work. The curtain stays closed so the family never hears it. To her the laugh is ballast. It is also a thing she must hide.
Mercy, liturgy, the kill, the free country, the metric, the ballast. Six rooms, one word, and the word means six lives. There are more than six. Becker’s man lives inside whichever hero system raised him and takes its sacred terms for reality.
To Graff the laugh is none of these alone and a little of most of them. What it is for her answers her own two terrors, and her terrors have addresses.
The first is erasure. A girl in Sunnyside looks west at the towers across the river and fears she will live and die on the wrong side of the water, unseen, one more woman the city never noticed. The single woman in her novels carries the fear in a sharper form. The dating market sorts people, and it sorts some of them out, and to be sorted out is a small social death, a rehearsal of the larger one. In The Shiksa Syndrome, the lie is a fight against erasure dressed up as a comedy of manners. The terror under the gag is real. A person can do everything right and still go unchosen, and the going unchosen feels like a verdict on the soul.
The second terror is the silence. Graff learned in the theater that a line can land on nothing, that the held beat can pay out into quiet, and the quiet is unbearable in the way Becker means. The comic word for it is dying. She built a craft on not letting the room go quiet, on the timing that keeps the laugh coming, on the dialogue that moves so the silence never gets a foothold. A dead room and a closed door are the same. Both are the world declining to answer.
Every hero gets made by subtraction. Becker’s man becomes someone by repressing the creature he cannot stand to be. Graff’s subtraction starts on the bridge. She gives up the safe Queens life, the early marriage, the version of the self who stays put and settles young, and she trades it for the precarious work, the acting and the copywriting and the novel that might not sell. She subtracts something harder too. She gives up the right to grieve in the open. The comic rule says the wound becomes the bit, that you find the funny in the bad date and the dead parent and the closed door before you let anyone watch you bleed. The rule protects her. It costs her the same hour. A woman who makes the wound funny first might lose the wound, might stand at her own griefs as a writer working material, might wonder which of her sorrows are real and which are drafts. The hero system shields and imprisons in the same motion. Becker said as much.
Her musical The Pet Project seats the two registers side by side on purpose. It puts a support group for people whose dogs have died on a stage and asks the room to laugh and cry in the same breath. That is her method in one set. Grief is the thing in the room. The laugh is how the people in the room survive being in it together.
Three coordinates hold her in place.
The laugh comes from the terror, and the terror is real, the erasure and the silence both, so the comedy reads as courage rather than evasion. Or it reads as evasion wearing the coat of courage, and the line between the two is thin, and her best pages live right on it. She is brave and she is hiding, and the same joke does both jobs.
The laugh costs her the open wound. This is the standing risk of the comic life, that the mask grows into the face, that a woman who turns every sorrow into a scene loses the ability to sit inside a sorrow that is only hers. She paid this and kept writing anyway, which is its own kind of nerve.
The laugh gives the rest of us a room. For ninety minutes or three hundred pages a stranger who came in alone gets a hero system on loan, a set of sacred terms that says the single life and the failed date and the unanswered call are survivable, even funny, and that the laughing together is a form of company. The woman in row three understood the offer. She came alone and laughed in a crowd and carried the book home, and the book is a room she can open again whenever the apartment gets too quiet.
Filed Under
The book tells you where it stands before you open it. A paperback original from Red Dress Ink, Harlequin’s chick-lit line, priced at $12.95, four hundred forty-eight pages, the title promising frogs and the imprint promising the rest. The imprint is a verdict. Harlequin sells category romance by the pallet, and the line called Red Dress Ink sold the single-woman-in-the-city version of it, and a reader who picks up You Have to Kiss a Lot of Frogs knows the rules of the room before Karrie Klein says a word.
Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002) built a way to read that verdict. In The Rules of Art and the essays gathered as The Field of Cultural Production, he describes literature as a field, a space of positions arranged between two poles. At one pole sits restricted production, the work made for other artists and for the critics who consecrate them, slow to pay, rich in prestige, poor in cash. At the other sits large-scale production, the book made for the market, quick to pay, heavy in sales, light in prestige. The field runs on a strange arithmetic. Economic success and symbolic standing trade against each other, so the bestseller and the prizewinner sit at opposite ends, and a writer who wants both asks the field for something its structure resists.
Chick lit sits at the commercial pole. The label arrived as a market category, the pastel covers and the stiletto silhouettes, and it hardened into a put-down. A fellow novelist of the period reckoned that calling herself a chick-lit writer sold her tens of thousands of extra copies, even as editors came to wince at the term. The genre earns at the register and loses in the seminar. It also draws the scholars who annex it upward: Stephanie Harzewski’s study The New Novel of Manners: Chick Lit and Postfeminism files the genre as heir to Austen and Wharton, which is the field reflecting on its own border and trying to move it.
Graff’s books reach across that border, and the trade reviews perform the reach. Publishers Weekly opens its notice of Frogs by filing the book as one more chick-lit dating comedy, then says it “moves beyond genre constraints” toward the search for a life that means something. The two halves of that sentence carry the Bourdieu story. The reviewer names the low category, then lifts the book out of it, and the lifting is the prestige operation. A reader runs the same combat from below, refusing the label and reaching for the consecrated name, filing the novel as a “novelized memoir” in the Philip Roth line rather than chick lit.
Bourdieu reads this gap as a position-taking, not a mismatch. The book that protests it is more than its genre performs the disavowal of the commercial that the field rewards with legitimacy. The denial of the money interest is the price of symbolic capital, and the writer who reaches up is paying it. The gap between where she sells and where she wants to be read is her position, drawn against the positions around her.
She arrives at the page carrying capital earned in other fields. She spent years as an actress, Frenchy in Grease on Broadway and the national tour, and the stage gave her the timing and the ear for talk that a category romance rarely shows, an embodied cultural capital the page can spend. She spent years as a publicist and a copywriter, and that work handed her the logic of the market from the inside. Her protagonists are publicists. Karrie sells spin, and so does Aimee Albert in The Shiksa Syndrome. The author who sells the single-woman story knows how the story gets sold, because selling was her trade.
The conversion shows in who vouches for her. The blurbs on Frogs come from Kelly Ripa and Fran Drescher and Finola Hughes, from a romance review site and a romance magazine. Ripa supplies the line “I never knew bad dates could be so good.” These are agents of the television and romance fields, and they consecrate inside those fields. The literary field stays quiet. No novelist of standing signs the back cover. Her declared influences map the same address. She names Nora Ephron and Carrie Fisher, The Mary Tyler Moore Show and That Girl, the comic-feminine line of film and television, the smart single woman of the screen, the Marlo Thomas character a girl in Sunnyside watched and wanted to become. The lineage is a claim about belonging, and the names belong to the screen and the bestseller list, not the seminar.
Read the roster and the field draws itself. Booklist and Publishers Weekly give her the trade notices a commercial novel earns. Family Circle and the Miami Herald and the Daily News review her in the service and metro registers. The Jerusalem Post and the Jewish press take up The Shiksa Syndrome. The television circuit carries her, Fox & Friends and CNN Radio and ABC World News Now. The absences speak as loud. No New York Times Book Review essay, no literary prize, no place on the lists the autonomous pole keeps for its own. The debut sold, earned a reissue, and crossed into Italian, Australian, and Dutch editions, and the popular verdict stayed mixed, a hair under three stars across more than a thousand Goodreads ratings. Commercial standing without the symbolic kind. The field did not misread her. It placed her where her capital put her.
The publisher history records a bid. The frog novels came through Red Dress Ink, the category line. The Shiksa Syndrome moved to Broadway Books, a trade imprint at Random House. The jump from a romance line to a general trade house is an upward step in the field, a try for more legitimacy, and the book that makes the jump carries the heaviest theme she has touched, Jewish identity and the cost of hiding it.
A fresh reading opens here. The Shiksa Syndrome wins consecration in a second field while it stays commercial in the first. Jewish-American letters runs its own contest with its own judges, the community press and the comic tradition that runs from the Borscht Belt through Philip Roth and Nora Ephron, and Graff’s premise pays in that currency. Alan Zweibel, a comedy writer of standing in that world, blurbs the book. The Jerusalem Post takes it up. She banks prestige among Jewish readers that the general literary field never extends to her.
The premise doubles the move. Aimee Albert passes. She straightens her hair, drops the weight, drops in green contacts, and crosses from Jewish to gentile to win a man who wants only shiksas. The novel is a drama of classification, a woman trying to change the category she is filed under and learning the category will not come off like a wig, that identity does not trade like a pair of Jimmy Choos. The author runs the same play one level up. Graff files her work toward the literary pole, dresses the dating comedy in faith and identity, and reaches for a standing the market resists granting her. The form mirrors the trajectory. A book about a woman who cannot pass comes from a writer the field will not quite let pass.
Bourdieu’s reading lands against the sympathetic story, and the sympathetic story is the familiar one. It says a sharp comic writer got trapped under a dismissive label and deserves a rescue. Bourdieu declines the rescue. The label is not a cage around the work. It is the position the work takes, drawn against the positions around it, and Graff’s trajectory equipped her for it. The actress and the publicist carry the capital of the commercial pole, performance and promotion, the gifts that sell the single-woman novel and the gifts that disavow it in the same breath. The reach toward the serious is part of the position, not an exit from it. She stands where a writer stands who has the talent to be read for pleasure, the training to sell, and the ambition to be taken for more. The field has a name for that place and a set of judges for it, and they are the judges who showed up. The cover told you where the book stood. The career confirms it.
Reading the Room
A man and a woman sit across a small table. The waiter has come and gone twice. She asks a question, he answers it and asks nothing back, and the answer lands and dies. She tries again. He checks the room over her shoulder. The talk will not find a beat. Each turn arrives a half second wrong, and the wrongness compounds, and by the entrée both of them have gone flat and quiet and tired in a way that has nothing to do with the hour. Nobody was cruel. The ritual failed.
Laurie Graff built a body of work out of that table.
Randall Collins (b. 1941) gives the table a grammar. In Interaction Ritual Chains (2004) he takes Émile Durkheim (1858-1917) on collective effervescence and Erving Goffman (1922-1982) on the encounter and turns them into a micro-sociology of the situation. An interaction ritual needs four things. Two or more bodies in the same place. A barrier that marks who is inside the encounter and who is out. A shared focus of attention. A common mood. When the focus and the mood feed each other, the bodies fall into rhythm, and Collins calls that rhythmic entrainment, the small synchronizing of voice and gesture and breath that two people slide into when a conversation works. The entrainment does the work. When it runs, the ritual pays out. It pays in solidarity, the sense of being a unit, and it pays in emotional energy, the lift a man carries out of a good encounter, the confidence and the warmth and the wish to do it again. When the rhythm never starts, the ritual drains instead, and both people leave with less than they brought. The bad date is a failed interaction ritual. Graff wrote the field guide.
The theater taught her to read the rhythm before she wrote a word of it. She played Frenchy in Grease on Broadway and on the national tour, eight shows a week, and a stage is the interaction ritual in its clearest form. The house and the cast share one room. The dark and the proscenium draw the barrier. The focus runs total, every eye on the lit figures, and the mood travels the seats and binds the strangers into an audience. The laugh is the proof of entrainment. A laugh is a room breathing on the beat, hundreds of bodies synchronized for a second, collective effervescence you can hear. Collins treats laughter as the plainest case of rhythmic coordination, and a comic actress is a woman who manufactures it on cue. Graff learned where the laugh sits and how long to hold before the next line, which is the craft of timing the room into rhythm. She learned it the way a body learns a skill, eight times a week, in front of strangers who came to be moved together.
A run lives on that exchange. A good house lifts the cast, sends the actors off charged, and the charge carries into the next night. A dead house drains them, and the green room after a flat performance is a low place. Collins reads a stage career as a chain of these encounters, each one charging or draining the performer, the energy banked from a strong night spent on the next. An actress on a long run lives on the audience’s nightly recharge. Graff spent years inside that trade and came out able to feel a room go warm or cold from the first minutes, the same skill her later work would ask for again.
She put the skill on the page. Her novels stage the encounters she spent a career reading, and the encounters live or die by rhythm. In You Have to Kiss a Lot of Frogs, the dates are a catalogue of failed rituals. One man wears the same clothes to every meeting. One barks to show affection. The comedy comes from the exact ways the rhythm refuses to start, the man who cannot find the beat, the encounter that arrives wrong and stays wrong. Karrie can move a room from a stage and cannot move a man across a table, and the gap between the two is the joke and the ache at once.
The Shiksa Syndrome: Buying the Wrong Bride (2008) sharpens the picture. Aimee Albert is a Manhattan publicist, the other entrainment trade, the work of fixing a reporter’s attention and steering a mood toward a story. Her boyfriend at the start is a stand-up comedian, a third professional of the timed encounter, and he breaks up with her on Christmas, which the jacket marks as poor timing for a man whose craft is timing. Graff fills her books with performers and publicists, people who build focused, shared-mood encounters for a living, and she strands them in the one ritual the skill cannot guarantee.
The singles mixer is an interaction ritual built on purpose. A kosher wine tasting gathers the bodies, draws a barrier around the eligible, and points every focus at the same task. Aimee meets Josh there, and Josh takes her for a gentile, and she keeps the mistake. Read through Collins, her makeover is a change of membership symbols. She straightens and dyes her hair, drops in green contacts, sheds the markers that read as Jewish, and the new emblems carry her past the barrier of a ritual that had filtered her out. The disguise works at the door and fails inside. The symbols she wears stop matching the mood she carries, and she cannot hold a shared feeling with a man while hiding the thing she feels most. The lie starves the encounter of the honest focus it runs on.
Her own life moves as a chain of these encounters across trades. The stage, the agency, the page, the classroom, each a different room running the same exchange. Collins says even the writer alone at a desk works inside the ritual, that thinking is talk with an absent audience, that a writer runs the encounter in the head and writes toward a room she imagines. Graff writes the laugh against an imagined house, the way she once timed a real one, and the readers who laugh alone with the book complete a ritual she staged for them in advance. A novel of hers is a record of timed encounters, played back in a reader’s head, and the warmth the reader feels is the entrainment crossing the page. She reads to rooms of women now, and the laugh that rolls up from the folding chairs is the live form of what the book does at a distance. She teaches the skill too. A workshop on dialogue and timing is a class in how to build an encounter that pays, and at the front of that room she holds the focus and sets the mood, the order-giver of a small daily ritual who gathers the energy the room gives off.
Graff spent a life on the room that catches the beat, the laugh that lands, the strangers who breathe together for a second and leave lighter than they came. She learned it eight shows a week, and she has been staging it ever since, on the boards, in the pitch, on the page, at the front of the workshop. The skill keeps one name across all the rooms. She knows how to time the moment when two people, or two hundred, fall into rhythm. Her books are about the nights the rhythm will not come.
Related Links
Pearl Abraham Elisa Albert Steve Almond Jonathan Ames Shalom Auslander Aimee Bender Karen Bender Amy Bloom Danit Brown Melvin Jules Bukiet Tamar Fox Naama Goldstein Rebecca Goldstein Yael Goldstein Laurie Graff Lauren Grodstein Ehud Havazelet Joanna Hershon Dara Horn Molly Jong-Fast Mitchell James Kaplan Binnie Kirshenbaum Sana Krasikov Adam Mansbach Tova Mirvis Gurumurthy Neelakantan Alana Newhouse Jon Papernick Rachel Resnick Thane Rosenbaum Elizabeth Rosner Wendy Shalit Ilana Stanger-Ross Laurie Gwen Shapiro Rochelle Shapiro Andrea Seigel Robert Siegel Terrie Silverman Margot Singer Leora Skolkin-Smith Yuri Slezkine Diana Spechler Steve Stern Ayelet Waldman Katharine Weber Tamar Yellin People of the Book Festival 2006
Yosef Abramowitz Edward Alexander Michael Berenbaum Sally Berkovic James Besser Reuven Blau Stephen Bloom Andrew Silow-Carroll Shmuley Boteach Benyamin Cohen Debra Nussbaum Cohen Robert Cohn Ami Eden Rob Eshman Larry Cohler-Esses Frances Dinkelspiel Matt Dorf Ami Eden Charles Fenyvesi Eric Fingerhut Amnon Finkelstein Sue Fishkoff Samuel Freedman Stephen Fried Robert I. Friedman Heshy Fried Jonathan Friendly Neal Gabler Evan Gahr J.J. Goldberg Ari Goldman Yossi Klein Halevi Malcolm Hoenlein Wayne Hoffman Hollywood Jews Mickey Kaus Eve Kessler Michael Kinsley Amy Klein Marc S. Klein Lisa S. Lenkiewicz Gene Lichtenstein Jason Maoz Jonathan Mark Deborah Dash Moore Alana Newhouse Gustav Niebuhr Ori Nir Steve Rabinowitz Gary Rosenblatt Jennie Rothenberg Debra Rubin Neil Rubin Walter Ruby Douglas Rushkoff Jonathan Sarna Cathy Seipp Rabbi Avi Shafran Mark Silk Sheldon Teitelbaum Jonathan Tobin Tom Tugend David Twersky Teresa Watanabe Steven I. Weiss Leon Wieseltier Paul Wilkes Lauren Winner Yori Yanover Larry Yudelson