How American Jews Can Protect American Muslims

Beinart writes:

On November 27, the Islamic Center of Lexington, Kentucky received an email vowing that “I’m going to kill everyone… there you Muslim f***s.” On November 24, when congregants at the Islamic Center of South Plains in Lubbock, Texas arrived for morning prayers, they found the mosque’s glass door smashed. On November 21, a group of armed protesters surrounded the Islamic Center of Irving, Texas, and then posted the names and addresses of local Muslims on Facebook. On November 20, the Islamic Center of Corpus Christi, Texas received a letter demanding that congregants “convert to Christianity now, before it is too late.” On November 17, police arrested a Houston man for threatening to “shoot up a mosque.” On November 16, the Islamic Center of Omaha, Nebraska was vandalized for the third time in four months. On November 15, worshipers arrived at the Baitul Aman Mosque in Meriden, Connecticut to find it riddled with bullet holes. On November 13, the Islamic Center of St. Petersburg, Florida received a call threatening to “firebomb you and shoot whoever is there.” On November 12, attackers smeared feces and vandalized Korans inside The Islamic Center of Pflugerville, Texas.

If you don’t think the United States is witnessing an epidemic of anti-Muslim bigotry, you’re not paying attention. It’s fueled by the savagery of ISIS. And it’s fueled by presidential candidates like Ben Carson, Ted Cruz and Donald Trump, who declare that Islam is “not consistent with the Constitution,” insist that America accept only Christian refugees and propose that the government register Muslims and close mosques. Because of their hateful opportunism, which is echoed daily in conservative media, less than a majority of Iowa Republicans now believe Islam should be legal in the United States

Posted in Islam, Jews | Comments Off on How American Jews Can Protect American Muslims

Do we really need people named Syed Farook in our country?

islam

islam1

bizarre

Michael Cohen
@speechboy71
Columnist, Boston Globe, World Politics Review; Political Correspondent, London Observer

markos

Ben Shapiro: “Reportedly devout Muslim kills a bunch of victims = nothing to do with Islam. The problem is those Christians who prayed for the victims.”

Jared Goede: “At least he wasn’t named Mohammed Mohammed.”

Posted in Islam | Comments Off on Do we really need people named Syed Farook in our country?

Real estate company advertises housing project free of non-Ashkenazi Jews

The average Ashkenazi IQ is somewhere between 105-120, the average Sephardic IQ is about 97, and the average Mizrahi IQ is 92.

REPORT: The real estate company Bemnuna, which caters to the national-religious community, caused a backlash on Monday when it released a promotional video for a new housing project in the Karmei Gat neighborhood of Kiryat Gat intended for Israelis of Ashkenazi descent, while ridiculing Mizrahim.

The video shows an Ashkenazi family lighting Hanukka candles and singing songs, when a knock on the door spreads fear across their faces.

The door abruptly opens and an exaggerated stereotypical Mizrahi Jew enters asking to borrow sugar. He then sees the Hanukka celebration and yells out the door to a friend, and the two invite themselves in to the chagrin of the Ashkenazi family – who reminisce what it would be like to light candles with other Ashkenazim.

A narrator cuts in and reads: “Do you also dream of your own home? Would you like neighbors who are to your liking?” And then introduces the national-religious housing project in Karmei Gat…

MK Dov Henin, head of the Knesset Housing Lobby, penned a letter to Housing Minister Yoav Galant (Kulanu) on Monday and called on him to intervene immediately and clarify that the government will not allow housing discrimination.

“The video presents a stereotypical, racist view lacking basic respect for the secular Mizrahi family compared to the religious Ashkenazi family, presented as the ideal Jewish family.

This advertisement is disturbing and outrageous, especially considering the decades of discrimination in housing among different groups in Israel, between religious and secular, between Ashkenazim and Mizrahim, and between Jews and Arabs,” he wrote.

“A government that closes its eyes in front of such advertising practices enables the exclusion of entire sectors from the right to housing and is a government collaborating with racial discrimination,” he added.

Henin also criticized the government for investing significant funds in a project that “excludes Mizrahim and secular [Jews].”

COMMENTS:

* Is it such “a crime” wishing to marry and live among similar minded people of similar backgrounds?

* I guess we all prefer to mix with people like ourselves however we shouldn’t kid ourselves that this is because people not like us are inferior.

Posted in Ashkenazim | Comments Off on Real estate company advertises housing project free of non-Ashkenazi Jews

Sailer in Taki’s: “Turf Wars: The Problem and the Promise”

Steve Sailer writes in Takimag:

That human beings are somewhat territorial animals is a concept that has gone out of intellectual fashion, but it offers useful insights into much of what is in the news. …

A common pattern in the news that becomes recognizable once you know what to look for is the message of: territorialism for me but not for thee. The people holding the megaphone vilify some manifestations of this basic human instinct as “nativism,” while celebrating others as “environmentalism.”

… For example, we are lectured that only xenophobic nativists worry about allowing Muslims to move en masse to Western countries because concepts like nationalism are obsolete, divisive, and uncool. But the sons of Muslim migrants pay no attention to these sermons denouncing territorial instincts. They tend to grow up on the streets of Europe to be extremely controlling of their turf, often forming street gangs to harass non-Muslim men and groom underage infidel girls.

Posted in Nationalism | Comments Off on Sailer in Taki’s: “Turf Wars: The Problem and the Promise”

Acid Attacks On The Rise, Majority Of Victims Are White Men

The price of diversity.

REPORT: Fewer than half of acid attack victims pursue criminal charges against their attackers, researchers have found. The study, also revealed that, contrary to the common perception of acid attacks, the majority of victims were white men.

Researchers from the St. Andrews Centre for Plastic Surgery and Burns, one of the UK’s leading burns units, examined data from 21 cases involving victims of acid attacks dating back over the last fifteen years, publishing the results in the journal Scars, Burns & Healing. They found that only nine of these cases (43 percent) were criminally investigated, while the remainder had no police involvement.

They also found that victims were mostly young men assaulted by male perpetrators, making the UK something of an anomaly – globally, 80 percent of victims of acid attacks are women. Only a third of the victims knew their attackers.

Although the researchers don’t believe any new legislation is warranted, noting that “sentencing powers reflect the severity of the crime,” they have argued in favour of more training for medical staff to support victims and encourage them to approach the police for help.

“As the first point of contact in a protected environment such as in hospital, this may be the only opportunity to provide these patients with a setting in which they may feel ‘safe’ enough to accept help,” the authors said.

Professor Shokrollahi, Consultant Burns & Plastic Surgeon and Editor-in-Chief of Scars, Burns & Healing further commented:

“This is a very important paper as there has been very little data and information regarding these types of assaults in the United Kingdom.

“Whilst there is no evidence of an epidemic, and of the 250,000 burns per annum in the UK these injuries account for less than 1 percent, it is still an alarming problem that we need to address – 21 cases in one burns service is 21 too many.

“There is a clear need to limit access to corrosive substances in a strategic way, but work needs to be done to ensure limiting access to one substance does not simply result in a shift to a different, more accessible substance.”

The research was supported by the Katie Piper Foundation, launched by the former TV presenter and model who was left severely facially disfigured by a sulphuric acid attack planned by her ex-boyfriend.

Posted in Diversity | Comments Off on Acid Attacks On The Rise, Majority Of Victims Are White Men

REPORT: New York Jewish Bookstore Manager Beaten by Self-Declared Muslim Yelling ‘F*** You Jews’

I hope people don’t draw conclusions from (another) isolated incident. Muslims love Jews! More Muslims please!

REPORT:

The manager of a Jewish bookstore on the Upper West Side of Manhattan was beaten up Monday afternoon by a self-declared Muslim man who threatened to kill him, New York Police Department officials told Jewish politics blog JP Updates.

Brooklyn native Salmon Salczer, 52, was inside West Side Judaica, when he saw a man pacing outside and peering into the store’s window. When Salczer approached the man to see what he wanted, the suspect punched him in the face repeatedly, while yelling, “F*** you Jews. I’ll kill you; I’m a Muslim.”

According to JP Updates, Salczer said he feared the attacker would strike him with a metal razer scooter he was holding. The suspect is believed to have later used the scooter to flee the scene. According to police, he is still on the loose.

Salczer called authorities and filed a police report. Detectives from the NYPD’s Hate Crimes Task Force are now investigating the incident as a hate crime.

Authorities described the suspect as a 5’10” dark-skinned male in his 20s. He was wearing a red jacket and blue jeans at the time of the assault.

From my FB discussion:
Paul Ciotti It’s not a sin not to want Muslim culture in America. Our current ethic makeup is fine just as it is. It would be even finer to have it the way it was before Ted Kennedy changed it in 1965.

Christopher Donnellan Many prominent Jews lobbied for weakening immigration restrictions and permitting mass third world immigration with the Immigration Reform Act of 1965, so in this case, unfortunately for this proprietor, the Kosher chickens came home to roost.

Lars Guillen-Creed The Muslim just needed a safe space to check the Jew’s privilege

Chaim Amalek If some Syrian or Somali migrants had been there to restrain him, or better yet, talk him down as a brother, little to none of this need have happened.

Posted in America, Islam | Comments Off on REPORT: New York Jewish Bookstore Manager Beaten by Self-Declared Muslim Yelling ‘F*** You Jews’

Daily Mail: The shocking moment a man tries to strangle an Orthodox Jew outside a Melbourne synagogue and screams ‘swear to Allah’ in his face – but HE is slammed to the ground by his much bigger target

REPORT:

Man, 39, assaulted a group of Jewish men outside Melbourne synagogue
He was filmed shouting ‘Go back to Israel’ and ‘swear to Allah’ on Thursday
Man then tried to strangle one of the Rabbis from Adass Israel Synagogue
He had allegedly stolen a child’s scooter from outside the synagogue
He was charged with theft, criminal damage and unlawful assault

A man who shouted ‘swear to Allah’ as he tried to strangle a Jewish Rabi outside a synagogue was tackled by a group of men dressed in religious attire when he became violent.
Video footage shows the 39-year-old man arguing with a group of Orthodox Jews outside the Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea, south of Melbourne, on Thursday night.
The Reservoir man, who was drunk at the time, had been walking with three others towards the nearby train station when he allegedly stole a child’s scooter from outside the synagogue.
He got into a verbal argument with several Jewish men who came out of the synagogue to question him over the alleged theft.

The man, who was wearing a red shirt, pair of board shorts and no shoes, then slapped one of them in the face after he was told to ‘talk nicely’.
The victim and another man quickly cornered him on the ramp of the synagogue and told him to settle down because the police were on their way.
‘You settle down right now. You’ve got booze inside of you, true or not?’ the Jewish Rabi said in the video.
The man, who repeatedly said he was Aboriginal, started shouting at one of the men: ‘Go back to Israel’ and asked ‘Do you want to swear to Allah?’.
The man was then caught on camera trying to grab hold of the Jewish man’s throat.
The group of men, dressed in religious attire, quickly tackled him and pinned his arms and legs to the concrete until police arrived a short time later.

The man was arrested and charged with theft, criminal damage and two counts of unlawful assault over the incident.
A Rabi from the synagogue told Daily Mail Australia the man who bore the brunt of the attack was not injured in the scuffle. He said police told him at the time the man was on drugs.
‘It was an isolated incident and it was handled very well. It wasn’t anti-Semitic. The guy was on drugs and ice,’ he said.
‘A group of four were walking through the lane and they walked past some of the kids. I think they made a comment and then they started stealing their scooters.
‘This guy decided to stay for some odd reason and that’s when it happened. We handed the footage over to police.’
The man was held by police for several hours before being released on bail. He will front Melbourne Magistrate’s Court on January 19 next year.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Australia, Islam | Comments Off on Daily Mail: The shocking moment a man tries to strangle an Orthodox Jew outside a Melbourne synagogue and screams ‘swear to Allah’ in his face – but HE is slammed to the ground by his much bigger target

Putin – The Quintessential Realist

John J. Mearsheimer writes in December of 2014:

…To argue that Russia’s reaction to NATO expansion was based on “resentment,” as Sestanovich does, is to trivialize the country’s motives. Fear is at the root of Russia’s opposition to the prospect of Ukraine becoming a Western bastion on its border. Great powers always worry about the balance of power in their neighborhoods and push back when other great powers march up to their doorsteps. This is why the United States adopted the Monroe Doctrine in the early nineteenth century and why it has repeatedly used military force and covert action to shape political events in the Western Hemisphere. When the Soviet Union placed missiles in Cuba in 1962, U.S. President John F. Kennedy, risking a nuclear war, insisted that they be removed. Security fears, not resentment, drove his conduct. The same logic applies to Russia. As its leaders have made clear on countless occasions, they will not tolerate Ukraine’s entry into NATO. That outcome scares them, as it would scare anyone in Russia’s shoes, and fearful great powers often pursue aggressive policies. The failure to understand that Russian thinking about NATO enlargement was motivated by fear-a misreading McFaul and Sestanovich still embrace-helped precipitate the present crisis…

…the United States was encouraging the opposition to Yanukovych before and during the protests. Such actions included the National Endowment for Democracy’s decision to ramp up support for
anti-Yanukovych groups and the active participation of top U.S. officials (such as Victoria Nuland, the assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs) in the public protests in Kiev.

These events alarmed Putin, not only because they threatened his relations with Ukraine but also because he may well have thought that the Obama administration was bent on overthrowing him, too. As I noted in my essay, Carl Gershman, the president of the National Endowment for Democracy, said in September 2013 that “Ukraine’s choice to join Europe” would promote Russian democracy and might eventually topple Putin from power. And when McFaul was the U.S. ambassador in Moscow, he openly promoted democracy in Russia, behavior that led the Russian press to accuse him of, in his words, “being an agent sent by Obama to lead another color revolution.” Such fears may have been exaggerated, but imagine how U.S. leaders would react if representatives of a powerful foreign country were trying to alter the United States’ political order.

McFaul argues that differences between individual leaders explain Russia’s alternating policies of cooperation and confrontation: everything is hunky-dory when Dmitry Medvedev is president, but trouble comes when Putin takes charge. The problem with this argument is that these two leaders hardly disagree about Russian foreign policy, which is why Putin is widely regarded as Medvedev’s “realist mentor,” to use McFaul’s words. Medvedev was president when Russia went to war against Georgia in 2008, and he has fully supported Putin’s actions over Ukraine this year. In September, he went so far as to criticize Putin for not responding more forcefully to Western sanctions on Russia. And even during the “reset,” Medvedev complained bitterly about NATO’s “endless enlargement,” as he put it in a 2010 interview.

There is a better explanation for Russia’s oscillating relations with the West. When the United States and its allies take note of Moscow’s concerns, as they did during the early years of
the reset, crises are averted and Russia cooperates on matters of mutual concern. When the West ignores Moscow’s interests, as it did in the lead-up to the Ukraine crisis, confrontation reigns. Putin openly welcomed the reset, telling Obama in July 2009, “With you, we link all our hopes for the furtherance of relations between our two countries.” And two months later, when Obama abandoned plans to put missile defense systems in the Czech Republic and Poland, Putin praised the decision, saying, “I very much hope that this very right and brave decision will be followed by others.” It is unsurprising that when Putin returned to the presidency in May 2012, McFaul, then U.S. ambassador to Russia, said that he expected the reset to continue. In short, Medvedev’s replacement by Putin was not the watershed event McFaul portrays it as-and had Medvedev remained president, he would probably have reacted to events in Ukraine the same way Putin has…

Posted in Russia | Comments Off on Putin – The Quintessential Realist

What Is The Purpose Of America?

Professor John J. Mearsheimer, my favorite political scientist, writes October 2015:

The purpose of American power is to keep the United States safe so its people can prosper economically and live in relative freedom. There is little agreement, however, on how to achieve that goal.

Since the Cold War ended, and especially since 9/11, the ruling elites in Washington have believed that the best way to protect the United States is to dominate the world and remake it in America’s image. They have relied upon military power and other forms of big-stick diplomacy to topple unfriendly governments and promote democracy. Thus, it is unsurprising that the United States has fought seven wars since 1989.

Unfortunately, this strategy has led to a string of disasters and is the main cause of the growing instability around the globe. Take the greater Middle East. The George W. Bush administration initiated unsuccessful wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that cost many thousands of lives, destroyed the regional balance of power and helped create the Islamic State. The Obama administration has foolishly prolonged the war in Afghanistan and launched a war against the Islamic State that it cannot win. It also helped topple Muammar el-Qaddafi in Libya, which produced a failed state,
and its policies have helped prolong Syria’s devastating civil war.

In Europe, Washington and its European allies precipitated a major crisis with Russia by trying to peel Ukraine away from Moscow’s orbit and make it a Western bulwark on Russia’s doorstep. The key ingredients of this boneheaded policy were nato and eu expansion, coupled with democracy promotion, which effectively means installing pro-Western leaders in countries like Ukraine—and maybe even Russia itself. Not surprisingly, Russia has fiercely resisted the West’s efforts to win over Ukraine, which is now engulfed in a civil war.

Trying to dominate the globe and push democracy on other countries does not work, as the United States has proved over the past twenty-five years. It is also unnecessary. The United States—because of geography, its sheer power and its nuclear arsenal—is remarkably secure. There is no need to pursue global domination, much less try to manage the domestic politics of other countries.

There is one meaningful threat to the United States: the appearance of a potential hegemon in Asia or Europe. The purpose of American power should be to ensure that the United States remains
a hegemon in the Western Hemisphere, and that there is no regional hegemon in Eurasia. This rationale led the United States to help prevent Imperial Germany, Imperial Japan, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union from becoming regional hegemons in the twentieth century, and it remains relevant today.

Regional hegemons are dangerous to the United States, because dominating their own neighborhood would give them freedom to intervene elsewhere, just as the American military is free to roam the planet today. The great danger is that a distant hegemon would eventually start to meddle in the Western Hemisphere, which could present a serious threat to the United States. Fortunately, there is no potential hegemon in Europe, but there is one in Asia: China. Accordingly, the principal purpose of American power should be to maintain U.S. dominance in the Western Hemisphere and prevent China from achieving regional hegemony in Asia.

Posted in America | Comments Off on What Is The Purpose Of America?

Disability – The New American Dream

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Getting a check for “disability” is the new “American dream.” Florida is crawling with former NY firefighters and cops collecting disability while waterskiing or remodeling condos. They’re otherwise fairly agreeable chaps (hardworking, politically conservative). Same goes for ex-military. If you drove a truck during Desert Storm or something you can now claim a 25% impairment to your back and get a check from Uncle Sam. No one speaks out against this sort of thing because a) “Support the Troops” and b) nearly everyone believes that an MRI showing a “herniated disc” is proof of a real injury (it isn’t).

* Our society has dedicated a large portion of its energy and resources to creating and promoting “firewatchers” from among our female populous. We have combat watchers, and crime watchers, work watchers and thought watchers.
A vast army of female watchers infest our halls of academia. Entire “disciplines” on campus are composed of a plurality of women whose intellect is below average, and the supermajority cluster about average, far below that required for college level learning. The advanced and terminal degree holders which emerge from that stew, cluster at the low edge of intellect required for basic degrees in real and challenging areas of learning. Yet hold tenure, and sway the content and direction of scholarship in general.
PMAFT has busied himself pointing out and criticizing the emergence of female tech-watchers who are now infesting STEM and attempting to drive its content and direction. He correctly predicts the dead hand of feminism grinding the gears of technological progress to a halt. As the scholarship-watchers have done to the humanities and the pseudoscience disciplines already.

* If you can’t be fired why move around some poor employees to a bad team or try to motivate others to work so they can belong? Do you just have some abstract reason to get your job done when nothing whatsoever will be different if you don’t get the job done? Is it like the people with hobbies, they just want to build a great miniature train set for their own personal satisfaction?

Whenever I had a job I exerted effort because it was important to my employer (generally involving directly or indirectly satisfying a customer who could take their money elsewhere) or I could forward my career by helping my employer function better or at least I could keep my job as long as my employer made money with my assistance. I worked to satisfy other people’s wants and needs. The money I earned could be used to satisfy my wants and needs as long as other people worked for the same reason.

Of course in government work, the customer pays at the point of a gun with no choice (taxes), and you produce whatever you want. Why bother to drive your workers to produce – nothing will be different if they do not produce except you work harder than you have to for no reason. I don’t understand these other incentives like higher status positions – why not give them out by lottery.

* Pensions and disability are a scam as currently constituted.

Double and triple dipping should be banned. You should get one pension, period. And disability should be contingent on the idea that one really cannot work, so working-at least in a similar capacity should be barred.

Teamster truckers used to be barred from barred from commercial driving of trucks whole retired. That was to keep Teamster retirees from competing with active Teamster drivers. An exemption was made for being a truck driver school instructor or a school bus driver in a rural area if the district was not Teamster or one they wanted to be.

In my area, the cops all retire in twenty years and then go to work as court bailiffs or parks and recreation security and get a second pension. Plus social security and lifetime medical. This should stop.

* I’ve been a French civil servant for three decades. There’s a one year probationary period in France. If you’re unfit for the job, the probationary period can last up to one year longer. It’s almost unheard of for someone to be fired during their probationary period (and after the probationary period, it is simply impossible). A French civil servant can be fired only for “faute lourde“, that’s to say, committing a crime while on duty, or being not only utterly incompetent, but also seriously antagonizing every one else (in other words, being a sociopath. I’ve known a few). Absolute incompetence is not a faute lourde.

The system works fairly well, actually. It’s great to go to work every morning, knowing that even if you perform poorly you can’t be fired. You can work serenely, which actually increases performance. Performing agents are given higher status positions (but usually, not higher salaries). It’s incredible how people can work their asses off for status.

I was for several years in charge of a team of people who had, for some reason, incurred the wrath of their bosses. I managed to make them work by playing on their need for inclusion: if you want to really belong to the team, you must do your work. Every team leader did exactly that. It works best, of course, with the losers who have no life outside of the workplace. It also works well with married fathers, who are usually proud enough to resent being labelled lazy. There are people who won’t work for any reason, and you can’t fire them. Punish them by having them sent to work in a unit headed by a psychopath, especially a female psychopath.

The worst of the worst are those who are incompetent, lazy, and who think that if they don’t get promoted, and faster please, it’s because of institutional racism / sexism / antisemitism, etc.

Lazy, incompetent bosses think that everyone else is like them, therefore they don’t trust their subordinates. They’ll always be on your back because they are very insecure. And, being lazy and ineffectual, they’ll go for the easy targets: the guys who actually work, because those are the workers whose self-esteem depends on their hard work being acknowledged.

A friend of mine, a white guy, had the silly idea of getting transferred to one of the French Caribbean islands, in order to be closer to his Venezuelan wife’s country. He was appalled by the laziness and incompetence of the local, Black civil servants. Actually, it was him who felt excluded: who’s that white guy who wants to make us toil? He lasted a couple of years and asked to be sent back to continental France.

I think that the private sector will devise methods to select good workers. Hire people for short term contracts, and only renew the contracts of the workaholic few. People who are natural workaholics work their asses off even when they know that they can’t be terminated even if their productivity decreases sharply.

Angela Merkel thinks that the riff-raff of the Third World will turn into superb German engineers and factory workers, when they have a chance to get a German education. Nope. They’ll turn Germany into what it’s already becoming: a decadent nation which cheats on its customers and lives off the reputation of former, smarter generations. So, what will they get in the end? Multiculturalism, which works so well in Syria. All the Germans of the future will have, is a country dependent on imports for energy and food, and whose two-digit IQ workforce can’t produce top-notch products anymore, let alone conceive them. Looks like poverty, crime and ethnic tensions to me.

Posted in Diversity | Comments Off on Disability – The New American Dream