Luke Ford

Virtual Pilgrim writes: 14:28. “Is America an idea?” Steven Crowder said, “The difference between us (America) and Denmark and Norway and Sweden is WE’RE NOT A PEOPLE, we’re a country of ideals. And if you’re willing to come in and make a go of it, we’re going to provide you with equal opportunity – not ensure equal outcomes. That’s the difference that requires a racial national identity vs a Constitutional Republic. So ironically, Socialism almost invariably tends to be racist to a certain degree. Which is funny when we say national socialism and democratic socialism.”

People like Crowder don’t know what a nation is. Nations are defined by race, ethnicity, language, culture, history, and religion. This is what it means to be an American. America is a nation, but The United States is not a nation. It is an ideology; An idea; A political system of laws. The United States and America are two different things. However, the United States protected the nation with the 1790 Naturalization Act which defines citizens as, “White persons of good character.”

John Jay understood this when he wrote: “Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people — a people descended from the SAME ancestors, speaking the SAME language, professing the SAME religion, attached to the SAME principles of government, very SIMILAR in their manners and customs…” ~ John Jay, First Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, 1787

Notice, “same ancestors”!!! This is why conservatives today a radical anti-American traitors.

Vox Day, today, writes: “One cannot strip a person of his nationhood because it is his birthright and can be confirmed by external bodies through the use of genetic science. But since one observably can strip a person of his government-issued identity, this proves that the issuing body is not, and can never be, synonymous with the nation.”

Which side of the lab leak hypothesis is the most likely to try to destroy people for being on the other side of this debate? Which side is most likely to harass the other?

Which side of the voter fraud discussion is the most likely to try to destroy people for being on the other side of this debate? Which side is most likely to harass the other?

Which side of the JQ is the most likely to try to destroy people for being on the other side of this debate? Which side is most likely to harass the other?

Which side of the political spectrum is the most likely to try to destroy people for being on the other side of this debate? Which side is most likely to harass the other? The normies or the dissidents?

Which side of the global warming hypothesis is the most likely to try to destroy people for being on the other side of this debate? Which side is most likely to harass the other?

It seems to me that doxxing and harassment are like terrorism — it is war by other means by people who are often outgunned in conventional conflict.

01:00 When the incoherent response is the best
06:00 The brotherhood of J. Edgar Hoover, https://www.npr.org/2022/11/22/1138189651/biography-j-edgar-hoover-gman-beverly-gage-fbi
08:00 Social networks don’t appreciate platform manipulation
11:45 The Ron DeSantis way, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2023-01-05/ron-desantis-s-war-on-woke-culture-could-pave-his-way-to-presidency

This is “the place where the sacrament of Brotherhood is administered, the Word of Brotherhood is preached, the Power of Brotherhood is felt, the Spirit of Brotherhood is manifested, the Love of Brotherhood is revealed.”