Dennis Prager: The Scariest Reason Trump Won

A few years ago, I would have wanted to believe this essay. It is much more pleasant to think that good values created this country rather than a particular genetic mix.

Now I just think this values argument is silly. Culture is downstream from genes.

The United States of America would not have become the United States of America if its founders were predominantly Chinese or black or Arabs or Jews or Catholics or Japanese or Australian aborigines. It was the product of Anglo-Saxons, the same type of people who created the glorious countries of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and England.

One you have a political faction that is “conservative”, you have already lost. Your society is going to hell. Conservative values should be like the water fish swim in — taken for granted. When you are an Orthodox Jew and you practice Orthodox Judaism with other Orthodox Jews, nobody says, oh, what we’re doing and how we approach life is really conservative. You just take it for granted. Once you start thinking about whether or not you’re going to practice Orthodox Judaism, or if you are conservative in your practice or beliefs, you’re already halfway out the door.

Dennis Prager writes:

There are many reasons why Donald Trump is the presumptive Republican presidential nominee. The four most-often cited reasons are the frustrations of white working-class Americans, a widespread revulsion against political correctness, disenchantment with the Republican establishment, and the unprecedented and unrivaled amount of time the media afforded Trump.
They are all valid.
But the single biggest reason is this: The majority of Republicans are not conservative.
Conservatives who opposed Trump kept arguing — indeed, provided unassailable proof — that Trump is not a conservative and has never been one. But the argument meant little or nothing to two types of Republicans: the majority of Trump voters who don’t care whether he is a conservative, and the smaller number of Trump voters who are conservative, but care about illegal immigration more than all other issues, including his many and obvious failings.
So, then, what happened to the majority of Republicans? Why aren’t they conservative?
The answer lies in America’s biggest — and scariest — problem: Most Americans no longer know what America stands for. For them, America has become just another country, a place located between Canada and Mexico.
But America was founded to be an idea, not another country. As former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher put it: “Europe was created by history. America was created by philosophy.”
Why haven’t the past three generations of Americans known what America stands for?
The biggest reason is probably the influence of left-wing ideas.
Since its inception, the left has opposed the American idea, and for good reason. Everything the American idea represents undermines leftist ideas. And the left, unlike most Americans, has always understood that either the left is right, or America is right.
America stands for small government, a free economy (and therefore, capitalism), liberty (which therefore allows for its inevitable consequence: inequality), the melting pot ideal and a God-centered population rooted in Judeo-Christian values (so that a moral society is created by citizens exercising self-control rather than relying on the state to impose control).
Only America was founded on the idea of small government. But the left is based on big government.
America was founded on the principle that human rights come from the creator. For the left, rights come from the state.
America was founded on the belief that in order to maintain a small government, only a God-fearing people can ensure a decent country. The left opposes God-based religions, particularly Judeo-Christian religions. Secularism, as much as egalitarianism, is as at the core of leftism.
The American Revolution, unlike the French Revolution, placed liberty above equality. For the left, equality is more important than all else. That’s why so many American and European leftists have celebrated left-wing regimes, from Stalin to Mao to Guevara to Castro to Chavez, no matter how much the regimes squelched individual liberty. They all preached equality.

A friend says: “Prager continues to toe the Neo-Con, Republican establishment line, while promoting his own lament over “values.” Of course Prager wasn’t lamenting George W. Bush’s values when he launched the totally unnecessary war against Iraq. Never forget that Iraq was a secular nation before we attacked in the 13 years since, over 90% of Christians who had lived in Iraq since the initial spread of Christianity, have either been killed or fled the country. Where are Prager’s precious values when it comes to preserving Christianity in Iraq?

You may have noted that no where among the reasons that he provides for Trump’s success has been Trump’s position on illegal immigration and especially immigration from Mexico, something which Prager was exceedingly sympathetic to until recently.”

Luke: You have to give Prager credit for not supporting the invasion of Iraq in 2003, though once the US went in, he said we had to stay in and do the place right.

Posted in Conservatives | Comments Off on Dennis Prager: The Scariest Reason Trump Won

Chaim Amalek: Donald Trump: The closest the goyim will get to a Moshiach of their own.

Would you rather have ten helpings of bliss or have your choice of Hillary or Trump be the next president?

Chaim Amalek: “Raise it to 10,000 and the decision becomes harder.”

Donald Trump is the closest any of us will get to see of Moshiach. Instead of saying, “when moshiach comes”, we say “when Trump is president.”

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Chaim Amalek: Donald Trump: The closest the goyim will get to a Moshiach of their own.

Why Monogamy Beat Polygamy

CiGU8hmUkAAlZHA

Source.

Posted in Monogamy | Comments Off on Why Monogamy Beat Polygamy

Obama’s last act is to force suburbs to be less white and less wealthy

Paul Sperry writes: Hillary’s rumored running mate, Housing Secretary Julian Castro, is cooking up a scheme to reallocate funding for Section 8 housing to punish suburbs for being too white and too wealthy.

The scheme involves super-sizing vouchers to help urban poor afford higher rents in pricey areas, such as Westchester County, while assigning them government real estate agents called “mobility counselors” to secure housing in the exurbs.

Castro plans to launch the Section 8 reboot this fall, even though a similar program tested a few years ago in Dallas has been blamed for shifting violent crime to affluent neighborhoods.

It’s all part of a grand scheme to forcibly desegregate inner cities and integrate the outer suburbs.

Anticipating NIMBY resistance, Castro last month threatened to sue suburban landlords for discrimination if they refuse even Section 8 tenants with criminal records. And last year, he implemented a powerful new regulation — “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing” — that pressures all suburban counties taking federal grant money to change local zoning laws to build more low-income housing (landlords of such properties are required to accept Section 8 vouchers).

Castro is expected to finalize the new regulation, known as “Small-Area Fair Market Rents” (SAFMR), this October, in the last days of the Obama presidency.

It will set voucher rent limits by ZIP code rather than metro area, the current formula, which makes payments relatively small. For example, the fair market rent for a one-bedroom in New York City is about $1,250, which wouldn’t cover rentals in leafy areas of Westchester County, such as Mamaroneck, where Castro and his social engineers seek to aggressively resettle Section 8 tenants.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Obama’s last act is to force suburbs to be less white and less wealthy

A Troublesome Inheritance

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* Maybe it’s just about the right time to ask the signatories of the letter to the NY Times denouncing Nicholas Wade whether they’d like a Mulligan.

Hysterical obfuscation and conspicuous moral posturing isn’t really a good look for a scientist. They might try to save themselves a little dignity while it’s still possible.

* Problem is, there’s been lots of immigration into England in the last 100 generations. I’m not talking about the recent overflow of Pakistani Muslims, etc, who have come in during recent generations, though they probably are having an effect. They’re just not analyzed here since they focused on people with deep roots in England. I’m thinking alot of this is due to immigration and domination by Germanic peoples over the last millenia or so. Vikings, Danes, the Normans, hell, even the Windsors- They of course would directly bring in many of these phenotypes- blonde hair, blue eyes, lactase, etc- but also if they conquered, set themselves up as kings and leaders, then there would be selection for their traits. They would secure the best resources for themselves, they would probably take many native women for their wives, and likely as they came to be accepted as the local authority many native women would prefer them as they tend to chase after wealth and power. So question is, how much was directly imported in, and how much is selection from within the earlier population? If someone said Americans have evolved over the past few generations to be more brown, is that what actually happened?

* Were you, Steve, the one asking what a preprint is?

A preprint is an article prepared for publication. It is designed to get results out into the conversation, stake ground on certain research, and informally spread ideas. Preprints exist and are in the form of an article that would be submitted to a journal or conference, but often in longer format.

Perhaps no journal will publish it. Perhaps publication takes four years. In certain branches of physics research, like string theory and quantum computing, there were only 2 possible journals to publish in. Waiting for publication was useless for interesting results. More, so few “peers” exist, and all of them want to know what you’re doing anyway, that why bother with the fiction that journaled “peer review” is anonymous or somehow more noble than just letting people read and critique your work.

So preprint archives were invented.in part, to kill off the monopoly of publication, or to get out ideas otherwise unpublishable.

* Rosie, what first attracted you to multi-millionaire Jason Statham?

ivanka

* When I grew up in the East, Persians had a specific look olive skinned (sabz) with dark hair and dark eyes (prominent nose) with a minority on the lighter side.

Then around early-mid naughties there came a huge wave of well-to-do Persians studying in London from directly from Iran. I was shocked to see that a vast proportion (plurality) had a new “Northern” (Caspian-Azeri) look of much lighter colours.

I thought nothjng of yet but then a friend from Kerman (sort of central-south Iran, the heartland of the Persian people) once randomly exclaimed to me “is it just me or are the new generation of Iranians much whiter?”

Post-revolution the country became much more integrated and the different regions started mixing; the old olive skinned Persian look (which even the Zoroastrians of Yazd sported) became increasingly diluted with mixture of the north (and the Azeri/Caspians of North Iran are particularly fair though ironically the Azeris of Azerbaijan are said to have a more Olive look).

This could be sexual selection on a mass scale in a generation or so. This of course happens in Latin American and especially Pakistan (as you scale up you marry light) but also in Iran the same general principles are operating (rich southerners marrying pale northerners in Tehran).

* Btw, whatever happened to Nicholas Wade and Troublesome Inheritance.

Maybe lack of overly hostile reaction buried it.

Despite the controversy, Bell Curve has entered the contemporary pantheon on discussion of sociology/biology cuz it stirred up so much discussion.

In contrast, Troublesome Inheritance was buried by polite disagreement by MSM.

Say BELL CURVE, and people know the book even if they disagree with it.

Mention Troublesome Inheritance, and it’s like… huh?

* In the fullness of time, truth will out, even very embarrassing truth.

One thing that this result is making obvious is that the truth of ongoing, and significant, selection in human groups is going to be verified from many angles, not just one. The most direct approach of course is to find the set of alleles that lie behind, say, IQ, and show that they are differentially distributed across human groups. Another way is now to show that in certain groups certain areas of the genome connected with IQ show signs of recent selection. I have little doubt that there will other methods to come to the same sort of conclusions.

There will come a time, likely within 5 years from what I’ve been hearing, in which it will be as discreditable for a geneticist or evolutionary biologist to dispute these conclusions as it became for physicists early in the 20th century to dispute the theory of relativity.

Which brings to mind the disgraceful letter sent to the NY Times by a number of geneticists and evolutionary biologists denouncing Nicholas Wade.

How will the signatories of this letter look come this new paradigm? Very much like those dogmatic physicists who rejected relativity. It may be that the single thing they are best remembered for is this disgraceful act of ignorance and suppression: they will be laughingstocks for the ages, a lesson taught to children to warn them of the dangers of ideology and dogmatism.

It really is time for them to get on the other side of this before their reputation and legacies are beyond repair.

Ch5Rj6uVEAAkpnh

* A quadruple bypass IS the surgery, not something you get after surgery. This in itself is quite hard on the body but he apparently had complications after the surgery – he didn’t really fully recover from it. Some people do OK after the surgery and are able to more or less resume their former lives and some people are never quite the same again. Clinton is in the latter category. The way the heart surgeons keep score, if you survive the surgery, it is a “success” for them. They don’t make any promises as to what kind of shape you will be in afterward.

Being a vegan isn’t that great for your appearance either. It’s hard to get enough iron in your diet without red meat and without it people tend to look pale and anemic. Also having a little fat on you makes you look better as an older man – the wrinkles show less.

Bill also has rosacea which creates that horrible looking redness around his eyes and nose.

We are used to seeing celebrity photos that are posed, with makeup and airbrushing and proper lighting, so a brutal flash photo like that is going to be shocking in comparison. In the old days kings used to get their portraits painted and the guy in the painting always looked a lot better and younger than actual man.

Posted in Race | Comments Off on A Troublesome Inheritance

Ricky Vaughn: ‘Here is Jennifer Rubin on Christie, before and after he endorsed the FASCIST-WHO-WAS-DENOUNCED-BY-THE-ADL Trump.’

Before:

CiD7cJIWkAArGzg

After:

CiD7cJVWUAIe4tl

Posted in Chris Christie | Comments Off on Ricky Vaughn: ‘Here is Jennifer Rubin on Christie, before and after he endorsed the FASCIST-WHO-WAS-DENOUNCED-BY-THE-ADL Trump.’

Jamie Weinstein – Thought Leader

This article is hilarious. Jamie Weinstein is a thought leader? Who exactly does he lead? Who does he influence? Whatever stature he has seems to have been bought by his parents.

All these so-called Jewish conservatives opposed to Trump show that they were never conservatives. They simply used the conservative movement to advance the interests of Israel.

This article vastly understates Trump’s Jewish support. It’s from common Jews, not the Jewish elites. Do you really think regular Jews want more Muslims, more Mexicans and more Africans in America? I don’t think so.

I think it is great that these so-called Jewish conservative who refuse to vote for Trump have been unable to stop his nomination and have been unable to throw Trump supporters out of the conservative movement. Instead, they’re getting left behind by America’s newfound nationalism. Good riddance to them!

This article is about 80% anti-Trump and yet there is much Jewish support for Trump, including among intellectuals. Jews were among the first to board the Trump bandwagon. Loren Feldman and Mike Cernovich were early Trump boosters. Trump’s campaign has always included Jews as his closest advisers. The Jewish role in Trump’s rise is an article yet to be written.

Trump has spent most of his life in New York and he knows the Jews, likes the Jews and they tend to like him.

CiEcx4kWsAAmaZ6

Jared Sichel writes for the Jewish Journal:

Faced with Donald Trump as his party’s presumptive nominee in this year’s presidential election, Jamie Weinstein, senior editor for the conservative Daily Caller website, said he may have to “take a Tums” and vote for Hillary Clinton — assuming Clinton becomes the Democratic nominee and there’s no third-party conservative alternative.
“Given that you have to vote, and my options are only Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, that’s what I’m left to choose from,” Weinstein said in a recent interview. “And I think Donald Trump is a threat to the American system, whereas Clinton is a threat to our economic wellbeing for four years.”
Weinstein, like many Jewish thought-leaders in the conservative world, says he not only will not support the inevitable Republican nominee — he would prefer another four years of a Democrat in the White House if Trump is the only alternative. And this is not only because of the danger he believes Trump poses to America; he also sees Trump as a long-term threat to conservatism and fears the movement may not recover from a Trump presidency.
Among Jewish #NeverTrump-ers are some of the most prominent voices of conservatism: Bill Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard; Jonah Goldberg, senior editor for the National Review (the magazine ran an entire anti-Trump issue in February); Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby; Ben Shapiro, editor-in-chief of the Daily Wire; nationally syndicated talk-show host Mark Levin; Washington Post blogger Jennifer Rubin; Elliot Abrams, a former George W. Bush adviser and senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR); Max Boot, also a CFR fellow and a former John McCain adviser; John Podhoretz, editor of Commentary Magazine; Seth Mandel of the New York Post; Bethany Mandel, senior contributor at The Federalist; David Bernstein and Ilya Somin, both law professors at George Mason University and both also writers for the Washington Post’s “The Volokh Conspiracy” blog, run by UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh; and Orin Kerr, a law professor at George Washington University and also a Volokh blogger…

“He is every horrifying stereotype of Republicans that those of us who are actually Republican have been fighting against for years,” Bethany Mandel said. “He’s already destroying all of that work, but he will likely do irreparable damage to the brand.”
Mandel, who lives in New Jersey, said she was particularly turned off by two of Trump’s antics. The first was when he told CNN’s Don Lemon in August that Fox News host Megyn Kelly had “blood coming out of her wherever,” in describing Kelly’s performance during a Republican debate in which she challenged Trump about past misogynist comments. The second was at a November rally when Trump mocked and imitated the disability of New York Times reporter Serge Kovaleski, who has a congenital joint disorder.
Shapiro had his own decisive #NeverTrump moment: “The point where I said, categorically, I will never vote for this human being was when he refused to denounce the KKK on national television two days before the Louisiana primary,” said Shapiro, who supported Senator Ted Cruz. “He panders to legitimately the worst elements in American life.”

…Trump supporters include some prominent people, such as billionaire Republican donor Sheldon Adelson, former Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer, New York Congressman Lee Zeldin and nationally syndicated talk-show host and Jewish Journal columnist Dennis Prager. The Republican Jewish Coalition also came out in favor of the presumptive candidate, issuing a statement on May 4 congratulating Trump after Cruz and Ohio Gov. John Kasich suspended their campaigns, saying Clinton “is the worst possible choice for a commander in chief.”

…Radio commentator and Jewish Journal columnist Dennis Prager has, since early in the nomination process, opposed Trump, but said he would vote for him if he became the nominee. “I said from the outset that if my darkest dreams were realized, and he became the Republican nominee, I would vote for him,” Prager wrote in an email. “The reason is that there is one thing that frightens me more than Donald Trump being elected president, and that is Hillary Clinton being elected president.”
He said Trump’s behavior and positions made him unsure “almost every day” whether he could maintain that position. Asked what Trump would have to do to lose his vote, Prager said, “He tries almost every day.”
Among the many distinctions Prager sees between a Trump presidency and a Clinton presidency: the Supreme Court, natural gas extraction (known as “fracking,” which Clinton has come out hard against during her campaign against Bernie Sanders), and, as he said, “An ever-expanding government taking over more and more of the American economy.”
Prager fears Clinton appointments to the Supreme Court could, for a generation, allow judges to “use the court to pass laws” otherwise not achievable with a Republican-controlled Congress or White House. Asked to respond to #NeverTrump conservatives’ fear that Trump is redefining—or has already redefined the Republican Party—Prager said that will only happen if he “succeeds as president, and doesn’t do so by adopting conservative policies.”
“Then he may indeed redefine Republican and conservative,” Prager said. “I’ll worry about that then. And if he fails, he will give new impetus to the traditional understanding of Republican and conservative.”

…What put Weinstein, the Daily Caller editor, over the edge was an incident in which Michelle Fields, Weinstein’s girlfriend and a former Breitbart reporter, was grabbed at a Trump event by campaign manager Corey Lewandowski as she tried to approach Trump to ask him a question. A Florida prosecutor charged Lewandowski with battery, and then later dropped the charges, but eyewitnesses corroborated Fields’ account, along with audio and video footage.

Posted in Conservatives, Donald Trump, Jews | Comments Off on Jamie Weinstein – Thought Leader

Christie’s Auctions Statue of Hitler for $17 Mil

New York Times:

The sale that Loic Gouzer, Christie’s deputy chairman of postwar and contemporary art, put together at 5 p.m. Sunday, the first of five successive spring evening auctions, at first seemed reckless, filling a catalog with challenging, even disturbing work. With a kneeling Hitler and a wooden grid of potatoes, it was a far cry from the auction staples that can be counted on to command high prices.

09AUCTION1sub-master768

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* As a young man I worked in an art gallery in Belgravia (i.e. one of the snobbiest parts of London) and I can confirm that the people who buy this rubbish are regarded as a joke, albeit a highly profitable one, by the people selling it. The same attitude prevails among the ‘artists’ churning out said rubbish, very few of whom have any talent beyond a hypertrophied gift for bullshitting.

* I love that the potato thing didn’t sell. Too subtle. You need to hit(ler) these people people over the head. A man with an Auschwitz tattoo being sodomized with a cross. A Madonna with a Down syndrome Christ pissing in his mothers mouth or perhaps the Madonna performing a coat-hanger abortion. Those would be “powerful” pieces.

Posted in Adolf Hitler | Comments Off on Christie’s Auctions Statue of Hitler for $17 Mil

300: Making America Great Again [Donald Trump Parody]

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on 300: Making America Great Again [Donald Trump Parody]

WP: From playboy to president? Trump’s past crude sex talk collides with his White House bid.

Trump’s comments turn out to be a lot more mild than I expected. I don’t see a big deal here, but then again, I’m probably jaded.

Washington Post: Over 15 years, radio shock jock Howard Stern and his buddy Donald Trump periodically carried on like towel-snapping “bros” in a locker room, rating women’s tops and bottoms, debating whether oral sex is “important,” and egging each other on about whether they would like to go to bed with a number of people, from Cindy Crawford to Diane Sawyer.

“You could’ve gotten her, right?” Stern asked Trump on-air shortly after Princess Diana’s death in 1997. “You could’ve nailed her.”

“I think I could have,” Trump said.

How about singer Mariah Carey? “Would you bang her?” Stern asked. Trump replied, “I would do it without hesitation.”

Trump’s crude talk on-air with Stern between 1990 and 2005 was part of an image he cultivated as a Manhattan playboy who had so many women that he barely had time to sleep. He was often seen at trendy nightclubs with different women, appeared on the cover of Playboy magazine, wrote in his books about all the women chasing him and publicly boasted about his sex life…

Some of Trump’s most raw language came during his appearances with Stern, when the two would critique women’s looks.

The BuzzFeed list included one clip in which Trump said: “Her boob job is terrible. They look like two light posts coming out of a body.” In another clip, Trump said, “A person who is very flat-chested is very hard to be a 10.”

Stern had a huge national audience and made a name for himself with off-color questions, like this one, to Trump: “Is oral sex important to you? Man to man, and I’ve had this discussion with many men.”

Trump responded, “No, it’s not important to me.”

In his recent interview with The Washington Post, Trump said he and Stern “had great moments” on the air, but he acknowledged he would not have said certain things had he known then that he would eventually be running for office. “Or I wouldn’t have gone on the show because that is the easier way of doing it,” Trump said.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on WP: From playboy to president? Trump’s past crude sex talk collides with his White House bid.