In attempting to find an angle on the much publicized fact that Germans are once again allowed to read Adolf Hitler’s “My Struggle,” published in two volumes, in 1925 and 1926, it might be instructive to examine some of the book’s more popular quotes and see whether or not they have stood the test of time.
To those of us who miss those smoke-filled rooms where party bosses traded for the country’s next leader, instead of the silly season events we call presidential primaries, Hitler wrote: “Sooner will a camel pass through a needle’s eye than a great man be ‘discovered’ by an election.”
Tired of the society of plenty with its ridiculous self-adulation and creature comforts? Hitler was, too, and he said so: “Mankind has grown strong in eternal struggle, and only in eternal peace does it perish.”
“Nature . . . puts living creatures on this globe and watches the free play of forces. She then confers the master’s right on her favourite child, the strongest in courage and industry . . . The stronger must dominate and not blend with the weaker, thus sacrificing his own greatness. Only the born weakling can view this as cruel.” Which is why he was so offended when African-American Jesse Owens came to the Berlin Olympic Games and robbed the master race of four gold medals, in 100 meters, 200 meters, long jump, and 4 × 100 meter relay.
Albert Speer wrote that Hitler “was highly annoyed by the series of triumphs by the marvelous colored American runner, Jesse Owens. People whose antecedents came from the jungle were primitive, Hitler said with a shrug; their physiques were stronger than those of civilized whites and hence should be excluded from future games.” So much for Nature and her favorite children…
“All the human culture, all the results of art, science and technology that we see before us today, are almost exclusively the creative product of the Aryan.” If you exclude those thousands of Jewish works of art, science and technology. It is widely accepted that the reason Hitler lost the war was that he drove away German Jews, who excelled in so many areas of art, industry, commerce and science.
“Blood mixture and the result drop in the racial level is the sole cause of the dying out of old cultures; for men do not perish as a result of lost wars, but by the loss of that force of resistance which is continued only in pure blood. All who are not of good race in this world are chaff.” Boy, was Adolf wrong on that one. It has been shown repeatedly that children of mixed races are smarter and stronger than their “pure blood” counterparts. It’s conceivable that had Hitler won the war, his racial policy would have caused Germans to become feeble and unable to fight diseases.
Here’s something he just made up but wasn’t as farfetched as one might think: “The spark of a genius exists in the brain of the truly creative man from the hour of his birth. True genius is always inborn and never cultivated, let alone learned.” The fact is that recent studies in identical twins that were raised separately find that IQ levels are about 70% genetically based and 30% the result of the nurturing each twin received.
Finally: “For there is one thing we must never forget… the majority can never replace the man. And no more than a hundred empty heads make one wise man will an heroic decision arise from a hundred cowards.” Yes, Mr. Schicklgruber was full of himself.
Posted inAdolf Hitler|Comments Off on As Germans Start Reading It Again, Here Are Some Unexpected Quotes from ‘Mein Kampf’
LAUGHING ALL THE WAY TO THE EU: Cecilia Malmström, the European Commissioner for Home Affairs, does not appear care at all about Sweden’s women and children being targets of brutal rape by aliens she promote entry into her own country.
Malmström is managing immigration policies and is essentially the person who can decide whether or not Muslim immigrants gain entry into Europe. She has promised entry to even more Muslim terrorists and misogynists, cloaked as asylum seekers and refugees, so they can commit more arson, rapes, and murders.
Cecilia Malmström is eager to let women and children be raped and abused in Sweden so she can pretend to be humanitarian and politically correct. Delusional Eurocrats like Malmström has destroyed their own countries. Sweden has the second largest rape percentage in the world (second after Lesotho, Africa), all due to Muslim immigrants.
.
Muslims rape over 300 Swedish children and 700 women in the first seven months of 2013: Crime Statistics
In the first seven months of 2013, over 1,000 Swedish women reported being raped by Muslim immigrants in the capital city of Stockholm. And that’s the numbers only for Stockholm! Over 300 of those were under the age of 15. The number of rapes is up 16% so far this year compared to 2012 numbers. A large proportion of the increase include rape of young [pre-teen] girls.
The official radio report quoted from BRÅ (The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention) refuses to mention the M-word in the socialist-suffocated Sweden, a country held hostage by the extreme left. But when you contact senior police and government sources they confirm (anonymous in fear of losing their jobs) that these numbers represent Muslims. And a majority of these rapes and sexual assaults are caused by Malmström’s new arrivals, the asylum seekers.
And these numbers are only the tip of the ice berg. According to the authorities, Sweden’s real rape statistics are 400-900% higher than official numbers. The BRÅ website states:
“As few as 10-20 percent of all sexual offences are reported to the police. The Swedish Crime Survey (Nationella trygghetsundersökningen, NTU) provides a better picture of the extent of criminality, with data on both victims as well as perpetrators — which is lacking in the criminal statistics. Of those who are suspected for sexual offences, the majority are men and only about two percent are women. A majority of the victims are women. In a third of reported rapes, the victim is younger than 15.”
In spite of these horrid numbers and Sweden’s rapid increase in rape statistics, EU Commissions nutter and Swede Cecilia Malmström wants even more Muslims to arrive to her country, and to have access to the rest of Europe
Cecilia Malmström is the European Commissioner for Home Affairs. She used to be a politician for the Liberal Party in Sweden, but moved on to the EU level when she was elected to the European Parliament in 1999, and was later elevated further to serve on the European Commission.
Part of Ms. Malmström’s job is to oversee immigration policy for the European Union. Like most functionaries in the upper reaches of the EU bureaucracy, she favors the cultural enrichment of Europe through mass Third-World immigration. She and other unelected Eurocrats in Brussels decide how much and what kind of immigration is best for the EU, and then impose their diktats on the member states.
Read Geert Wilder’s letter to this truly insane left-wing socialist Cecilia Malmström who clearly doesn’t care at all of the safety of women and children in her own country. It’s free game for Muslim men to assault women in Sweden and punishments are lenient. In fact, instead of punishing them as they should, Malmström brings in more rapists in the thousands each year.
Before venturing to the libtard headquarters of Brussels Cecilia Malmström was a left-wing liberal in Sweden. Incidentally the left-wingers have always been the terrorists of Europe before Islam began terrorising everyone. Left-wingers were regularly investigated by security services pre 1990 for violence and inciting violence and stirring up problems that undermined peace and order for others. No wonder they fit so well with Muslims.
Sexual assault: A previous article showed a chart on sexual crimes from The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (BRÅ), a government body for crime statistics. Watch the increase of rapes in Sweden after the country became more lenient on ME immigrants, asylum seekers and third world (mainly Muslim) immigrants. The overwhelming chunk of immigrants to Sweden are Muslims (5%) who also exploit about 60-70% of the entire welfare budget in region after region through the country. The fact that numbers are increasing each year without control demonstrate that Sweden does not care about its crime victims and does not punish perpetrators sufficiently.
UPDATED REPORT January 2014:
Sweden doesn’t want to tackle their rape epidemic. It looks nicer if they just sit back and pretend nothing happened, or discuss around the topic rather than address the real issue: Muslim men endorse and feel entitled to rape.
A rapid 24% increase in violent rape of children within a one year period (2012-2013) is blamed on ‘changes of definition’ to the description of the meaning of rape… made in 2004.
Now how does changes to the definition or description of violent rape minimize the significance of the increased numbers 8 and 9 years after these changes were made? Just amazing excuses for Muslim and immigrant brutality on a tiny country like Sweden. You can find the original source to this in the reference section further down.
From Brottsförebyggande rådet, BRÅ:
Rape and other sexual crimes.
In 2013 was reported a total of 17 400 sexual offences, which is an increase of 4% in comparison with 2012. Reported offences of rape, sexual molestation and sexual coercion, accounted for 91% of crimes in the category marked as sexual offences.
The notified rape decreased by 5 per cent to 5 890 notified crimes me source 2012 – by 2013, while the notified crimes of sexual harassment increased to 8 710 notified crimes (+ 15%). Sexual coercion, exploitation, and more decreased by 10% compared to in the previous year.
Speaking to a ten-year period (2004-2013), the registered (a) rapes increased significantly, which can largely be explained by changes in sexualbrottslagstiftningen, which entered into force on 1 April 2005. The changes involved amongst others an expansion of the definition of rape, which meant that certain acts which had been headlined as sexual exploitation was designated as rape. Effect one of the law change is seen in statistics on the number of reported rapes increased between 20 05-2011, while the number of reported crimes relating to sexual coercion and exploitation decreased. The development of the the number of reported crimes related to sexual coercion and out access, however, has not been as strong and long-lasting as the number of notified rapes. Levels in the statistics is also affected by occasional reports containing a large number of offences against the same victims (2005 and 2008). From 1 July 2013 tightened sexual offences-the legislation once again; including expanded rape to include cases where the victim reacts with inaction/passivity. Even changes in anmälningsbenägenheten can affect how many rapes are reported.
.
Reports of rapes in Sweden for 2011, 2012, 2013: [google translated]
Rape including violent assault, rape against children under 15 years of age
396 [2011] 380 [2012] 495 [2013]
Rape incl. violent (also included in violent crime) Against girls under 15 years
349 [2011] 326 [2012] 437 [2013
Rape incl. violent (also included in violent crime) Against boys under 15 years
47 [2011] 54 [2012] 58 [2013]
Reported rapes of children under 15 years of age throughout Sweden, 2011, 2012, 2013:
Rape incl. violent (also included in the crime of violence) of children under 15 years
2 260 [2011] 2 065 [2012] 1 856 [2013]
As a whole, the reports of all rapes for 2013:
The reported rapes fell by 7 per cent to 5 890 crimes.
Notified crimes of violent violations decreased to 1,700 reported crimes (– 11%) while the violent assault of women decreased to 2 140 notified crimes (– 13%).
Posted inIslam, Rape, Sweden|Comments Off on Sweden: Muslims rape over 700 women and 300 children within the first seven months of 2013: Crime report
If Donald Trump is elected president, he can appoint Southern whites to lead the armed forces, and then declare martial law to take care of otherwise insoluble problems.
Whatever it takes to take America back. Or we can continue to be the dumping ground for the world’s refuse (the position of all the major Jewish organizations). If you ever want to know what is good for America, check out what the biggest Jewish organizations support (gay marriage, tranny rights, multi-culturalism, black rights, more refugees, more Muslim immigration, immigration amnesty, banishing Christianity from the public square, no prayer in public schools, no creches on public property, “Happy holidays” instead of “Merry Christmas” etc) and do the opposite.
In the next 20 years, the South will win the Civil War. What you are not allowed to say in public now (the conventional wisdom in the 1950s) will be the reigning ideology.
There has been a debate within the party — and the political class — about whether Republicans need to diversify to win or whether it just needs to attract even more of its core constituencies. So far in 2016, led by Cruz and Donald Trump, the election has moved decisively toward the latter. The exceptions, such as Jeb Bush and Lindsey Graham, are either out of the race or on the edges of it.
Trump is making the most visceral, raw appeal to people who feel left out of the economic recovery and ignored by the political establishment. He espouses hard-line views on immigration that border on nativism, protectionist trade policies and a tough approach with countries like China, Japan and Mexico that he portrays as thieves of U.S. manufacturing jobs.
Posted inAmerica|Comments Off on WP: Republican hopefuls agree: The key to the White House is working-class whites
Bloomberg: Donald Trump is the new favorite to win the Republican presidential nomination, Betfair said, less than three weeks before Iowa caucus-goers cast the first votes of the 2016 election.
The odds on a Trump victory are 15/8, or 34 percent, putting the billionaire real-estate mogul as favourite in the market for the first time, Betfair said in an e-mailed statement in London on Wednesday. Previous favourite Marco Rubio widened to 11/5, or 31 percent, while Ted Cruz is 7/2, 22 percent. Betfair didn’t provide earlier odds in its e-mail.
Posted inDonald Trump|Comments Off on Trump New Favorite to Take Republican Nomination, Betfair Says
Charles Boissoneau-Nunno: To leave us your engrams for the future A.I.
Don Booth: To make a difference
David Morgan: To talk about Jews.
Darren Melamed: Because all the 12 step programs are over.
Charles Edward Lincoln: To totally aggravate everybody on both sides of the Jewish Question…and several other millenia defining questions.
Joshua Zeidner: To troll
Buddy Lee: Do you believe it will be revealed to you during your time here?
David Brosia: Pure entertainment
* Luke, most of your site is reposted news stories with far less of your self conscious commentary as starring content. Are you burnt out?
Have you found a mate yet or is religion still your mistress? Do you still think too much and live in your head like most air signs? Do tell.
I was about four years of age in this photo. I lived for about a year with Fiona (above) and her parents Ken and Eleanor Barrett, in Shepparton, Victoria, Australia before my family got back together after my dad married a second time (in November of 1970) and we all moved to England. My mom Gwen died of cancer just before I turned four. So while she was sick, her last three years of life, all of us Ford kids lived with different families most of the time.
VDARE: Judges will use even the most absurd rationales to enable illegal aliens to remain in our country. As our own Allan Wall recently revealed, an illegal alien homosexual from Mexico named Jose Crespo-Cagnant was allowed to stay in the country because of the nonexistent persecution of gays in Mexico. But the enablers of this kind of fraud have names. And one name patriots need to remember is Ursula Ungaro-Benages.
In another case, after discovering she had Jewish ancestors, she asked then Chief Justice William Rehnquist to appoint a special judicial panel so she could cash in on a family fortune lost during the Holocaust [Holocaust suit raises foreign policy issue, by Ron Grossman, Chicago Tribune, July 7, 2003]
But Ungaro-Benages also has a certain contempt for the Constitution. The illegal alien Jorge Crespo-Cagnant had been previously removed from the country under an Expedited Removal Order. Under Section 302 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IRIRA), this is the legal process by which an illegal alien can be removed without judicial or administrative review.
Now the paper of record for Miami had reported the removal of Crespo-Cagnant was “unconstitutional.” Actually, Ungaro-Benages simply vacated the Expedited Removal Order.
Rebeca Sánchez-Roig, the attorney, recently won the case when U.S. District Judge Ursula Ungaro threw out an immigration agency order against Crespo-Cagnant that sought his expedited removal.
“The court finds defendant’s expedited removal order was invalid,” Ungaro wrote in her Nov. 13 opinion. “Accordingly it is ordered and adjudged that defendant’s motion to dismiss [the removal order] is granted.”
Crespo-Cagnant, 36, won the case because his attorney demonstrated that immigration officials had failed to consider her client’s plea not to be returned to Mexico for fear of persecution because he is gay.
“What this means is that he is free out of any kind of criminal charges,” Sánchez-Roig said. “That hopefully the Border [Patrol] will vacate the expedited removal order that the judge ruled was unconstitutional and José will get an opportunity then to adjust his status.”
Nature has color-coded people so we can make instant decisions for our well-being. It’s a great tip for who is more likely to be a friend or an enemy.
Washington Post: It’s the lashing-out theory of Trumpmania. President Obama, Sen. Bernie Sanders, and others have speculated that working class whites are signing on to Donald Trump and his inflammatory anti-immigrant rhetoric out of a deepening anxiety over their place in the 21st century American economy.
Some political scientists, however, say antagonism toward immigrants is being driven by a more primal instinct: mistrust of outsiders — or even racial prejudice, either of the conscious or unconscious variety.
A body of academic research has tried to deconstruct why some Americans are skeptical about immigrants. Are they driven by policy concerns, about economics, or security? A general dubiousness about foreigners? Or a deep-seated aversion to people of a different skin tone?
A study forthcoming in the journal Political Psychology sheds new light on these questions. Political scientist Mara Ostfeld, who will be an assistant professor at the University of Michigan, randomly assigned white, non-Hispanic people to read different fictional stories about an immigrant family.
In one version of the story, the immigrants are sitting at a diner eating buffalo wings and discussing baseball. In another, the immigrants are at an ethnic food market eating spicy goat meat and talking in their native tongue.
After seeing the stories, the people were asked broad questions about immigration policy.
People who read about the American-acting immigrants expressed more positive feelings about immigrants and immigration policy in general — they were more likely to believe immigrants are helping America, more likely to support increasing the number of immigrants, and less likely to support building a fence on the Mexican border.
In other words, Ostfeld showed that people’s attitudes about immigration can be nudged just by having them read stories about immigrants who behave in traditionally American ways…
On all these measures, respondents shown the darker-skinned immigrants were less likely to be accepting. Asked for their feelings about these scenarios a scale of 1 to 10, people given the darker pictures were about half a point less enthusiastic on average.
It’s hard to detect racial prejudice in surveys because people tend to censor themselves when a stranger asks directly. But by comparing subjects who were randomly shown different pictures, Ostfeld got to measure people’s knee-jerk biases.
Ostfeld’s study shows that context matters to the immigration debate. “It’s really important we understand that our perceptions of threat are different, whether we’re thinking about immigration in the abstract or in our own communities,” she says.
When the discussion is about immigration policy in general, people are mostly concerned with way immigrants act, not the way they look. Will the newcomers fit in? Will they adopt American ways of life, or change what it means to be American? But if you get specific — if you talk about immigrants moving in next door — then people’s racial biases also start coming to the fore…
This issue has become particularly salient as immigration takes center stage in the GOP presidential primary. Trump has rallied supporters by inflaming their anxieties about immigrants, calling some Mexicans rapists and Syrian refugees terrorists. Trump’s platform makes this a local issue, talking about the impact of immigration on “communities, schools and unemployment offices.”
Earlier this month, the New York Times published data suggesting that the most racist places in America — where people tend to make the most “racially charged” Google searches — are often the same areas where Trump has the strongest support among conservatives.
Researchers have found that racism tends to predict anti-immigrant views. Public opinion surveys, for example, show that whites who hold negative stereotypes about blacks are also more likely to oppose immigration, and to support making English the official language of the United States. This is a “surprising” result, the authors note, because most immigrants these days are not black, but Latino or Asian.
While many have blamed economic stress for causing Trump voters to direct their anger at immigrants, these and other studies show that views against immigration are often guided by deeper instincts.
“In fact, the evidence suggests there’s more to the view that it’s all about culture — that people are threatened by different ways of life, different religions, and different languages,” says Shanto Iyengar, a political science professor at Stanford. “You have a bunch of other people speaking other languages, with brown skin, going to temples and mosques, and that is what is making people oppose immigration.”
Posted inRace|Comments Off on WP: The telling way white Americans react to pictures of dark-skinned immigrants
Since the scores of New Year’s Eve sexual attacks on German women by hundreds of men identified as Arab or North African, the left in Germany has faced a dilemma: which to fight for first — women’s human rights or multiculturalism?
This was the same dilemma that faced British authorities between 1997 and 2013. During those six years at least 1,400 girls from the age of 11 in just one English city (Rotherham, population 275,000) were raped by gangs of men, nearly all of whom were immigrants (mostly from Pakistan) or their sons.
But British authorities kept silent. Why?
In 2014, the reason finally was revealed: The perpetrators were Muslim, and British authorities were therefore afraid to publicize — or often even investigate — the crimes. They feared being branded Islamophobic and racist. Politicians on the left and right acknowledged this fact.
As I wrote in a column in 2014:
“In 2002, a Labor Party MP from nearby Keighley, Ann Cryer, complained to the police about ‘young Asian lads’ raping girls in her constituency. In her words, she ‘was shunned by elements of her party.’ And note, that as is demanded by the left in the UK, she didn’t even mention that the rapists were Pakistani, lest Muslims be blamed for this evil. They were ‘Asian lads.’”
The British Home Secretary, Theresa May, told Parliament that “institutionalized political correctness” was responsible for the lack of attention given to the mass rape.
In other words, between protecting over a thousand girls from repeated gang rape and protecting Muslims from being identified as the rapists, British authorities chose to protect multiculturalism and “diversity.” In the competition between multiculturalism and one of the most elementary instincts and obligations of higher civilization — the protection of girls and women from sexual violence — higher civilization lost.
The U.K. is of course not alone in having multiculturalism and the fear of being branded racist or Islamophobic take precedence over protecting girls and women. Some German authorities’ reaction to the events of New Year’s Eve in Cologne exemplified this.
After the attacks in Cologne, the mayor of Cologne suggested, in the words of The New York Times, “that women can protect themselves from men on the streets by keeping them more than an arm’s length away.”
In the mayor’s words: “It is always possible to keep a certain distance that is longer than an arm’s length.”
Aside from the moral foolishness of the comment, it is factually incorrect. It is often impossible to keep an arm’s length distance from others — as, for example, on a crowded bus or train, or, as in Cologne on New Year’s Eve, on crowded streets.
It is important to note two things about the mayor. One is that she has been among Germany’s most vociferous advocates of accepting 800,000 Syrian refugees into Germany.
The other is that she is a woman.
One would assume that a woman would instinctively wholly condemn the sexual predators rather than lecture women on the distance they should always keep from men in order to avoid being attacked. But the mayor, like the British authorities, has opted for multiculturalism over human and women’s rights, for fighting Islamophobia over fighting to protect women.
A related example is Ralf Jaeger, the interior minister of North Rhine-Westphalia state, the German state in which Cologne is located. The left-wing minister said: “What happens on the right-wing platforms and in chat rooms is at least as awful as the acts of those assaulting the women.”
All the isms of the left — multiculturalism, feminism, environmentalism, socialism, Marxism, egalitarianism — distort the individual’s and society’s moral compass. But, as the minister’s comments make clear, none do so more than the left’s loathing of conservatives and conservative values.
As with multiculturalism, a left-wing priority — in this case destroying the right — has distorted the left’s moral compass. How could anyone in his right mind write that right-wing platforms and chat rooms are “at least as awful” as women being sexually attacked and even raped by gangs of men? The answer is that you cannot be in your right mind; you have to be in your left mind.
