Setting the Record Straight: Longtime Partner of Jared Taylor Addresses White Nationalist Criticism

Heidi Beirich writes:

For nearly 30 years, Evelyn Rich, the longtime romantic partner of white nationalist Jared Taylor, has been attacked by white nationalists accusing her of being Jewish. Recently, Rich contacted the Southern Poverty Law Center after being viciously attacked by the notorious anti-Semite, John DeNugent.

Editors’ Note: Rich wrote her Ph.D. dissertation on the Ku Klux Klan in the late 1980s. She lives with Jared Taylor, who runs the white nationalist group American Renaissance in northern Virginia. They have two children together. In the past, Taylor has distanced himself from anti-Semites and been heavily criticized in the movement for it. Rich, though not an anti-Semite, asked Hatewatch to publish this letter. The unrelenting attacks accusing her of being Jewish and an infiltrator offers an interesting glimpse into the virulent anti-Semitism that motivates many members of the movement.

It was March 1985, thirty-one years ago, in Groton, Massachusetts, when I got behind the wheel of my little Datsun 310 hatchback and began the first of two extended trips to the Southern states and Washington, D.C.

I was a doctoral student at Boston University and my dissertation topic was the ideology of the modern Ku Klux Klan. I had met and interviewed my first Klansman back in October 1980, when Bill Wilkinson, Imperial Wizard of the Invisible Empire Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, arrived In Boston from Louisiana and held a rally in Connecticut of all places. The New England news media went on a feeding frenzy.

I was 23-years-old and had lived in Britain my entire life. (I came to the US for the first time in August 1978 as a Foreign Exchange Student.) I was intrigued by this garrulous man who took me to dinner and talked to me for several hours. I was surprised to learn the Klan still existed. Everything I knew about it came from the book and film versions of “Gone With the Wind.”

I was a doctoral student at Boston University and my dissertation topic was the ideology of the modern Ku Klux Klan. I had met and interviewed my first Klansman back in October 1980, when Bill Wilkinson, Imperial Wizard of the Invisible Empire Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, arrived In Boston from Louisiana and held a rally in Connecticut of all places. The New England news media went on a feeding frenzy.

Who joined the Klan? Why? What did Klansmen believe? Everything I read in the press implied or stated that Ku Klux Klan was a self-explanatory term. Like Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s definition of pornography –– “I will know it when I see it” –– the Klan did not need to be defined. Klansmen were just plain nuts. End of story.

Before I pulled out of the driveway I had arranged a couple of months of research opportunities. (These were the days before the Internet and mobile phones). I wanted to interview as many Klansmen and former Klansmen as possible. I wanted to talk to as many anti-Klan groups and individuals as possible. I wanted to go everywhere! I wanted to talk to everyone! I did my best. I interviewed Klansmen, I went to Klan rallies and cross “burnings” or “lightings.” I talked to anti-Klan groups and individuals, I went through the FBI’s files in Washington, DC and I talked to everyone who would talk to me. I went everywhere I was invited and tried to get invited everywhere else.

Through these initial contacts, I met more and more people and was given all sorts of opportunities. David Duke suggested I attend an Institute for Historical Review conference. Thanks to David’s sponsorship I was able to attend my first conference and because I was a student, Willis Carto was kind enough to waive my registration fee. Thanks to that first IHR conference I met Mark Weber and was invited to the next one. Thanks to the next one I met Jared Taylor, who was there as a Japanese interpreter. Thanks to Jared I have two wonderful children.

So, why am I writing this? Why now? Why at all?

After 30 years of listening to discussions about me by people who do not know me, I have finally had enough. I would not care what rot is said about me were it not that I am a mother. Recently a despicable Internet bully and notorious fruitcake has begun “wondering” about my daughters. My daughters are off-limits. I need to let them know I will never submit to bullies and loonies, I also need to let them know I will not put up with lies and rubbish. Not all adults are grown up.

All of this comes down one question: Am I a Jew?

The answer is no, I am not a Jew. I am not a Jew by religion, ethnicity, race or any other criteria or definition. My accusers, and they are accusers, give the following reasons for thinking as they do. Here they are and here are my replies:

• I look Jewish. – If I look Jewish to you, then I look Jewish to you. That was an was an easy one!

• My surname is allegedly Jewish. – I am not American, and no one in my family is American. Plenty of people have told me that in the USA Rich is a version of the German surname “Reich”. Nobody in my family has ever set foot in Germany. (Okay, I once changed planes in Munich). It is nonsense to assume that the German surname Reich has any connection to the ancient and venerable ENGLISH name of Rich. There have been English people named Rich as long as there have been English people. In addition to the Earls of Warwick, possibly the most famous branch of the Rich family, we also boast an Archbishop of Canterbury, Edmund Rich (1175–1240). I do not know of any English people named Reich, let alone any English people who changed their names from Reich to Rich. If Americans do this weird stuff, that’s their business.

• I am a Jewish agent or “Honeypot” whose houri-like fascinations have forced Jared into a philosemitic trance and caused him to refuse to attack Jews. What utter rot! If anyone knows how to make Jared do or not do anything, please let me know. I’ve failed for 25 years! This is such a load of codswallop I refuse to believe any rational person could even consider it! (The rational and interested might like to know I married a German-American, surname of Klumpp. Maybe I could have saved myself a lot of trouble by calling myself Klumpp?)

Finally, I am attaching a number of documents for those who prefer to “Trust but Verify.”

• My Christening certificate from November 1957.

• My Bible presented to my at school. C of E is the officially taught religion in English schools.

• My father’s Christening certificate from 1929

• My father’s Royal Navy records stating his religion as Church of England. (God Bless him for his service to his country)

• My grandfather’s Royal Navy records stating his religion was also C of E. (God Bless him for his service to his country)

• My great great grandparents’ C of E Marriage banns – James Rich and Lucy Morris who were wed in1852. (Morris is my dad and grandpa’s middle name.)

I could go on, but this message and these documents are intended for the lucid and rational. Others who accidently stumble upon them will disregard them and proceed as usual.

Evelyn Beatrice Mackenzie Rich
Oakton, VA
April 18, 2016

Posted in Jared Taylor, Jews | Comments Off on Setting the Record Straight: Longtime Partner of Jared Taylor Addresses White Nationalist Criticism

The Alt-Right Explained in 7 Must-Know Terms

I think people should read the following websites and make up their own minds:

Steve Sailer
Amren.com
Takimag
Radix Journal
VDARE
Amerika.org
Social Matter
Those Who Can See
Breitbart
HBD

Jews on the Alt-Right include:

Rabbi Mayer Schiller
Rabbi Nachum Shifren
Rabbi Meir Kahane
Paul Gottfried
Robert Weissberg
Mike Cernovich
Lauren Southern
Ron Unz
Loren Feldman
Uri Segelman

Jews on the Alt-Right vary over how much legitimacy they give to gentile Alt-Right criticisms of Jews (such as those by Kevin MacDonad).

Ari Feldman writes for the Forward:

This presidential election has seen the rise of a new group in American conservatism: the blandly-termed — and fiercely pro-Trump — “alt-right.” The blogs, forums, and Twitter accounts that make up the media landscape of the alt-right actively promote fascism, albeit one updated for the 21st century.
Though the movement ties together white supremacy, neo-Nazism and misogyny, it rarely uses any of these terms. Eugenics has become “human biodiversity”; a white supremacist is now an “identitarian.”
These false terms are misleading, and provide cover for racist, xenophobic subcultures — groups that have never had a better chance to reach a wider audience than with Donald Trump running for president.

It would be one thing if this were a lexicon of the conservative fringe. Instead, the presumptive Republican nominee is retweeting the alt-right’s homegrown imagery.

Ahead of the Republican convention in Ohio, here is a primer on seven things that explain the alt-right tick.

1488

Read: neo-Nazis. The number is an amalgam of two neo-Nazi calls to action. One is their 14-word credo: “We Must Secure The Existence Of Our People And A Future For White Children.” The second-half, 88, is because H is the eighth letter of the alphabet: 88 → HH → Heil Hitler. Some alt-right bloggers have dismissed 1488ers as pretenders and Internet pranksters, but the 1488ers vehemently disagree.

Cuckservative

This term, which became popular in the middle of 2015, describes conservatives who promote policies that are detrimental to the continued prominence of white people. It’s a clear sexual reference: a cuckold is the husband of a woman having an affair. The term implies that establishment conservatives such as Ted Cruz, John Kasich, Karl Rove and Marco Rubio (the “Beltway right” of Washington, D.C.) are letting liberals and non-whites “screw” the white race out of its preeminent position.

“Cultural appropriation”

Read: white exceptionalism. The alt-right has claimed a kind of kinship with the “radical left” on a few issues, and one of these, absurdly, is cultural appropriation. Much in the same way that “cultural Marxists” want to keep fraternities from donning offensive costumes on Halloween, the alt-right has an interes in re-appropriating all “white” cultural signifiers, such as princesses, superheroes, witches, pirates, and Vikings.

The (((echo)))

Read: yellow badge. This is Nazi branding, updated for the internet age. The “echo” refers to the idea, popular among alt-righties, that “all Jewish surnames echo throughout history,” — that Jewish control of the world is obvious and traceable. The “echo” has its origins in a denialist podcast called The Daily Shoah. It has been used by the alt-right on Twitter to identify and berate Jews, especially those in the media. However, the “echo” was taken up by many Jews on Twitter of their own accord, and has been turned into a symbol of anti-alt-right defiance.

Human biodiversity

Read: eugenics. “Human biodiversity” is a neutral seeming term that is used by the alt-right to not only justify, but lend “scientific” authority to their racism. The alt-right fixates particularly on IQ tests, claiming that the low scores of black Americans is evidence of a racial disparity in cognitive ability.

“Identitarian”

Read: white supremacy. Aka: “identity politics.” A movement that began in France the early 2000s, identitarianism has picked up steam in the U.S. in the last couple years. Its institutional center is the National Policy Institute, an ultra-nationalist think tank in Arlington, Virginia, which the Southern Poverty Law Center has expressly condemned for its ties to white supremacist groups.

Pepe the Frog

Originally a harmless Internet cartoon meme used, mostly, to signify chillness, Pepe the Frog has been taken up as an avatar by alt-righties and neo-Nazis. The cartoon has also been morphed with Trump, depicting Trump-Pepe on a border wall holding a machine gun, or hammering a nail into Bernie Sanders’ head.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on The Alt-Right Explained in 7 Must-Know Terms

Should Australia Stay White Or Merge With Asia?

From VDARE 2008:

The great nations of the Anglosphere seem determined to merge themselves out of existence.

Mass immigration is making the U.S. a part of Latin America, while an emerging North American Union would combine Canada, the U.S. and Mexico.

Across the Pond, Britain surrenders her sovereignty to the European Union. Not to be outdone, Down Under, the Australian Prime Minister appears to want to merge Australia with Asia.

An article in the Herald Sun entitled Unified Currency Chance with Asian Union, Says Expert [Jane Metlikovec, June 05, 2008] reports that Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has “announced his plan to create a broad Asia-Pacific Community by 2020.”

A certain Prof. Tim Lindsey of Melbourne University thinks that`s a great idea:

“We are living in the “Asia century,“ he said.”Australia is uniquely positioned as the only Western society in Asia and we have never capitalised on that, despite most of our commodities going to Asia.“

So what about Australia`s Western identity and Anglo-Celtic heritage? Apparently, that can be easily disregarded:

(Lindsey) said Australia was still suffering from a “colonial hangover“ by setting ourselves apart from Asia. “This perception of ourselves as a European nation has to change,“ he said.

PM Rudd has chosen a point man to advance the project:

“Mr Rudd has appointed former foreign affairs secretary and one-time ambassador to Indonesia Richard Woolcott as Australia`s envoy to sell the idea.”

There is some political opposition:

Opposition MPs are divided about Mr Rudd`s plan, which he put forward during a speech to the Asia Society Australasia Centre last night, just days before he heads off on a week-long visit to Japan and Indonesia.

Opposition`s foreign affairs spokesman Andrew Robb says the plan is presumptuous.”His (Kevin Rudd) first job is not to be making pronouncements about grand architecture for the region, telling China, Indonesia and Japan and India how they will be organised as a region by Australia in the next 20 years,“ Mr Robb told ABC Radio.

Nevertheless, Robb`s opposition seems more a question of practicality than a concern for Australia`s cultural identity:

“Once (Rudd) has demonstrated a capacity to build and maintain and grow strong bilateral relationships with all these countries (and) repair the damage he has already done with some of these countries, then we can… maybe influence the broader architecture that shapes the region.“

How about the argument that Australia`s cultural identity is non-Asian? Is that a legitimate argument nowadays?

From VDARE today:

Pauline Hanson, a fiery populist leader who has been working to save Australia from mass immigration for many years, triumphed in the recent elections. Though as of this writing the total number of seats for her One Nation party has not been determined, it’s certain Hanson herself has one.

The Main Stream Media is shrieking hysterically, as you might expect.

Far-right One Nation leader Pauline Hanson is pushing for a royal commission into climate science and Islam and wants to abolish the Family Law Court, in an extreme policy agenda set to frustrate a future government trying to pass laws through the Senate.

The federal election has resurrected the political career of the controversial figure, whose party is expected to snare at least one Senate spot 18 years after she lost the Queensland seat of Blair.

[Election 2016: Pauline Hanson’s big Senate win, and what she plans to do with it, by Nicole Hasham, Sydney Morning Herald, July 3, 2016]

Don’t you just love the name-calling? “Far-right,” “extreme,” “controversial?” Leftists are never described in such terms in supposedly objective news reports.

In response, Hanson is threatening to boycott the MSM altogether. She simply takes for granted the MSM will be fanatically opposed no matter what she does and so, Trump style, she’s going to take her case straight to the people.

Pauline Hanson has launched a spray at the media ahead of her return to Federal Parliament, complaining of bias against her and warning she will bypass traditional newspapers and TV networks in favour of “citizen journalism”.

Ms Hanson, whose One Nation party is on track to claim two but possibly as many as four Senate seats, warned in a video posted on her Facebook page that she would not give interviews unless the media stopped treating her as “a punching bag”.

“So what I’m saying [is]: get your act together. I could be in Parliament for up to six years. I wouldn’t mind a working relationship with you, but if you’re not going to give me a fair go, don’t come knocking on my door, because you ain’t going to get an interview out of me.

[Election 2016: ‘Punching bag’ Pauline Hanson attacks the media after Senate win, by David Wroe, Sydney Morning Herald, July 6, 2016]

This is one of the key ideas patriots are finally starting to understand. The Main Stream Media’s reporters are just leftist activists by another name. They use different tactics, but they aren’t fundamentally different from the screaming leftist protesters in the streets. They share the same goals, the same ideology, and the same enemies.

Hanson’s comeback is also causing much wailing and gnashing of teeth among certain members of the political class.

Former foreign minister Bob Carr says Pauline Hanson will hurt Australia’s image overseas, calling her a “mischievous troublemaker and racist”.

Mr Carr, who now works full-time on improving relations between Australia and China through roles at three prominent Sydney universities, said the re-emergence of One Nation would have been noted with alarm across Asia.

[Australian federal election 2016: Pauline Hanson’s political comeback an ’embarrassment to Australia’, says Bob Carr, by Heath Aston, Syndey Morning Herald, July 6, 2016]

It’s almost like those who have a financial stake in transforming Australia into a culturally Asian country don’t like patriotic movements.

Incidentally, we last saw Bob Carr (who has a Malaysian wife) when he was complaining about Margaret Thatcher (accurately) predicting Third World immigration as the ruin of Western nations.

Posted in Australia | Comments Off on Should Australia Stay White Or Merge With Asia?

NYT: After Attacks on Muslims, Many Ask: Where Is the Outpouring?

Given what happens when Muslims move into non-Muslim countries, it is rational for non-Muslims to have some negative feelings about Muslims, just as it is rational for non-blacks to have negative feelings about blacks moving in.

The plaint truth is that normal healthy non-Muslims do not want Muslims and Africans flooding into their countries.

New York Times:

PARIS — In recent days, jihadists killed 41 people at Istanbul’s bustling, shiny airport; 22 at a cafe in Bangladesh; and at least 250 celebrating the final days of Ramadan in Baghdad. Then the Islamic State attacked, again, with bombings in three cities in Saudi Arabia.

By Tuesday, Michel Kilo, a Syrian dissident, was leaning wearily over his coffee at a Left Bank cafe, wondering: Where was the global outrage? Where was the outpouring that came after the same terrorist groups unleashed horror in Brussels and here in Paris? In a supposedly globalized world, do nonwhites, non-Christians and non-Westerners count as fully human?

“All this crazy violence has a goal,” Mr. Kilo, who is Christian, said: to create a backlash against Muslims, divide societies and “make Sunnis feel that no matter what happens, they don’t have any other option.”

This is not the first time that the West seems to have shrugged off massacres in predominantly Muslim countries. But the relative indifference after so many deaths caused by the very groups that have plagued the West is more than a matter of hurt feelings.

One of the primary goals of the Islamic State and other radical Islamist groups is to drive a wedge between Sunni Muslims and the wider world, to fuel alienation as a recruiting tool. And when that world appears to show less empathy for the victims of attacks in Muslim nations, who have borne the brunt of the Islamic State’s massacres and predatory rule, it seems to prove their point.

“Why isn’t #PrayForIraq trending?” Razan Hasan of Baghdad posted on Twitter. “Oh yeah no one cares about us.”

Hira Saeed of Ottawa asked on Twitter why Facebook had not activated its Safety Check feature after recent attacks as it did for Brussels, Paris and Orlando, Fla., and why social media had not been similarly filled with the flags of Turkey, Bangladesh and Iraq. “The hypocrisy is the western world is strong,” she wrote.

Posted in Islam | Comments Off on NYT: After Attacks on Muslims, Many Ask: Where Is the Outpouring?

The Trump Strategy

Daniel McCarthy aka Tory Anarchist tweets:

* Almost seems Trump has deliberate strategy to keep the spotlight on himself, not his opponent, good light or bad.

* If that’s his strategy, it relies on media playing along: grasping a distraction from Hillary’s woes. Trump offers easy alternative target.

* As a strategy, preempting your opponent’s bad news cycle w/ bad news of your own seems nuts, unless you think attention is all that counts.

* That said, Trump used his gaffes to good effect in the primaries. He sucked all media oxygen away from rivals—made them background figures.

* Trump won the primaries this way: he kept the limelight 100% of the time by being as outrageous as necessary. He became whole focus of race.

* The more outrageous & surreal the Trump-focused race became, the more ridiculous his opponents looked. He thrived in the climate he created.

* Trump’s opponents were mostly the usual stuffed shirts & grifters pretending to be serious men. They needed the pretense. Trump blew it away.

* Now there’s Hillary Clinton. Sober stateswoman? Look at her polices—Iraq, Libya, banks—look at abusing her State Dept communications. C’mon.

* Trump shattered the myth of GOP respectability with his own complete lack of respectability. Can that work against Hillary? Fun to find out.

* President Trump would have the press, the Democrats (back in civil libertarian disguise) & much of his own party against him. Strong checks.

* President Clinton will have a sycophantic party, servile press, opposition at civil war with itself. Illusion of unity hiding deep cracks.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on The Trump Strategy

Left-wing German politician who was raped by migrants admits she LIED to police about her attackers’ nationality because she did not want to encourage racism

Daily Mail: A young left-wing German politician has admitted she lied to police about the racial background of three men who raped her in case it triggered reprisals against refugees in her country.
Selin Gören, the national spokeswoman of the left-wing youth movement Solid, was attacked by three men in January in the city of Mannheim where she works as a refugee activist.
The 24-year-old was ambushed late at night in a playground where she said she was forced to perform a sex act on her attackers.
After the assault she went straight to the police – but she did not tell them the ethnic make-up of the men, that they were speaking Arabic or Farsi.
Selin, aware of the backlash that migrants suffered after the events in Cologne on New Year’s Eve – when hundreds of women were sexually assaulted and robbed by marauding gangs of immigrant youths – instead said she was robbed and said her attackers spoke German.
Now she has told Germany’s Spiegel magazine why she lied. After her initial interview at the end of January she returned to the police 12 hours later to tell them the real story.

She said a friend talked her into going back to the police with the real story because another woman had been raped in the area – an accusation later retracted by the alleged victim.
Selin, who has visited refugee camps in Iraq where she was shocked at the squalor people are living in, did not want to stoke ‘more hatred against migrants ín Germany.’
To help her cope she wrote an open letter to a fictional refugee and posted it on Facebook. It read in part: ‘I am really sorry that your sexist and line-crossing treatment of me could help fuel aggressive racism.

Posted in Germany, Rape | Comments Off on Left-wing German politician who was raped by migrants admits she LIED to police about her attackers’ nationality because she did not want to encourage racism

Donald Trump Causes Charles Murray To Change His Mind On Low-Skill Immigration

AEI: But there are certainly going to be politicians, even if Trump should lose badly, who present a cleaned up version of the Trump agenda and say “I can sell that.” So you’re going to have a populist, Trump-like candidate, and then some candidates pushing a more conservative, free-market agenda.

Well, Jim, maybe I’m a good example of the positives that can come out of the Trump phenomenon, because it’s forced me to rethink. You know, I’ve never really wrote about immigration, never published much on it. But my own attitudes have always been that government has to be able to secure its own borders, and if controlling our borders meant building a fence, that’s OK with me. And I just don’t love immigration but I especially love high-skill immigration, and I’ve been sympathetic to the notion of low-skill immigration creating problems for working-class Americans but I haven’t been energized enough about that to actually write anything about it. Well, I think that was a mistake on my part.

I am now prepared to support extreme restrictions on low-skill immigration, whereas I wasn’t before and I’m not doing it because I’m scared of the Trump phenomenon, I’m doing it because I’m saying to myself I wasn’t paying sufficient attention to a really legitimate grievance. Now, what I’d like to see is a lot of people on the right embracing that kind of appropriate response to Trump and then redoubling our efforts to explain why free trade is such a good thing — because there you can explain this is a win-win situation, protectionism is a lose-lose situation, and I think that we have to stick by our guns in something like that.

On immigration, my concern is that I see that a lot who say “We need to build a wall” or “We need to deport illegal immigrants”, and they move from that to “We need to stop even legal immigrants if they’re low skill”, and then they move to, “we can’t let in the high-skill immigrants either” and “We can’t let foreign students study here.”

I think you’re being too pessimistic there, Jim. I think that there is no constituency out there for stopping high-skill immigration…

Got you. I asked the Twitterverse what I should ask you. One question is, of course, do you still stand by “The Bell Curve”?

Duh. Of course I do. Look, Jim, the dirty little secret about “The Bell Curve” is that it did not push the scientific envelope at all. We were in the scientific mainstream. Every single significant statement we made — scientific statement we made — has not only not been refuted; they have been confirmed by subsequent research. Now, if you’re saying do I stand by the things that people said, “The Bell Curve” said, no, because we never claimed those things in “The Bell Curve.” The rap on “The Bell Curve” was that Herrnstein and Murray wanted to prove the genetic inferiority of blacks to whites in IQ, which is not even an issue in “The Bell Curve,” let alone not a major issue. But unfortunately that’s the way the book has been characterized. Do I stand by “The Bell Curve” as it was actually written? Sure, totally.

What should policymakers know or understand about IQ?

That it is an all-purpose resource that has, because of our economy and the improvements in our educational system, allowed people of high-ability who disproportionately earn a lot of money, to create a new class in the United States, a class that did not exist 60 years ago. A cognitive elite. And unless you take into account all of the effects of that class at the top and a class at the bottom that has gotten the short end of the stick in this very valuable general resource called intelligence, unless you understand the dynamics of that, you are going to pursue solutions in social policy that don’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of working.

If you don’t buy that theory and you think people’s intelligence quotients are very malleable, then what are policy solutions that you’ll pursue?

You’ll go around saying things like, “Everybody should go to college.” The reality is the percentage of 18-year-olds who can thrive in college — I’m not saying get through college, I’m saying thrive in college — is actually about 10-12% of the population. Now insofar as we have about 35% of the population with B.A.s, obviously a lot more people can get through it, but the actual cognitive demands are such that it is actually and educational experience that a relatively small proportion of the population can really profit from.

Posted in Charles Murray, Immigration | Comments Off on Donald Trump Causes Charles Murray To Change His Mind On Low-Skill Immigration

A plea from the brother and victim of a predator

Yehuda Pogrow writes:

Meir Pogrow, the justly-condemned sexual predator, is my older brother. He is roughly nine years my senior. I share my story because I hope to launch a movement that will raise from the ashes of this tragedy a new hope for all victims of child abuse — whether or not the specific abuse is a crime in a given jurisdiction, or whether the victim is a minor or a young adult vulnerable to abuse by a perpetrator who holds a position of authority.

I identify with my brother’s victims, because I was — perhaps — his first. He first abused me approximately 30 years ago, in my boyhood years. My brother did not attack me sexually. Rather, over a period of roughly 10 years, he subjected me to severe physical, verbal and emotional abuse. He is short, but he was strong. He would lift me above his head, my whole body parallel to the floor, just let go, and walk away as I crashed to the floor.

I was 17 the last time my brother physically abused me. I had finally grown strong enough to defend myself. He chased me and tried to hit me, but I deflected him. When I thought he had quit trying to hurt me, I dropped my guard. He then stared me in the eyes with a gruesome expression. My arms were at my sides when he punched me, breaking my nose and giving me a concussion. The next day he told me — gleefully — that he broke my nose intentionally. He also explained that I deserved it, because I did not spend enough time studying Torah during my time off from yeshiva.

In my journey of recovery from my brother’s abuses, what has been most difficult to overcome is not the impact of the physical pain — what is most enduring is the psychological trauma and manipulation that he used in order to groom me for the physical pain.

It is this psychological torment that he inflicted that makes me identify so strongly with his later victims. Numerous victims of his torment have spoken out on Facebook. I suspect that it was on me that he first exercised those psychological abuses.

My brother’s carnage is massive, and it spans multiple continents, but it is tragically far from the only carnage. Abuse by faculty in the yeshiva school system has occurred for decades; yet today there remains no system-wide enforceable plan to protect children. Far too many administrators are enablers — at a minimum due to failures to act on complaints brought to their attention — in many of the crimes committed by faculty in yeshivas across the globe.

My brother taught at YULA, a Los Angeles yeshiva, in the 1990s. On Facebook, in a comment replying to a post about my brother, one YULA alumna stated, “But I clearly remember discussing him with other staff members and no one taking us seriously.”

In a separate comment, that same alumna wrote, “I do clearly remember discussing my discomfort about him to another teacher, possibly the principal after a discussion that he instigated about masturbation.”

The YULA administration should issue a public statement to either discredit this former student’s version of events, or confirm that it dismissed Meir immediately after they verified her complaints, and that it did everything in its power to ensure my brother was never allowed in a classroom again.

After leaving YULA, Meir joined the faculty at Michlalah, a school for young women in Israel.

Numerous Michlalah alumnae I met during my time as a student at Queens College in New York told me that my brother was verbally abusive, and that he fostered a cult-like mentality. His groupies were known as “Pogs.”

My brother was not the only perpetrator of abuses I experienced as a child. I was a victim of severe physical and emotional abuse in Yeshiva Bais Mikroh in Monsey, at the hands of Rabbi Gavriel Bodenheimer, among others. Bodenheimer and other faculty abused me — and many other children — more than two decades ago, as fellow faculty and my schoolmates looked on. Bodenheimer has since pleaded guilty to endangering the welfare of a child. He is also subject to the typical restrictions imposed on sex offenders.

How could Bodenheimer have remained principal at Bais Mikroh until 2015?

I believe that on a per-capita basis, the magnitude of the cover-ups of sexual, physical, emotional and verbal abuses in the yeshiva system is on par with that of the Catholic Church.

JERUSALEM POST June 21, 2016:

A prominent rabbi and educator living in Beit Shemesh has been accused of misusing his authority and position for his sexual gratification.

An ad hoc rabbinical court of senior rabbis in Israel and the US issued a warning instructing women to avoid all contact with Rabbi Meir Pogrow, the founder of a website and study program called Master Torah, designed to aid the study of religious texts and retain the knowledge acquired.

According to the Master Torah website, Pogrow has rabbinical ordination from several authorities, including from the Chief Rabbinate, and is qualified as a rabbinical judge.

He has taught at Yeshiva University High Schools of Los Angeles, the Michlala seminary in Jerusalem, and was head of the Kollel (program for married yeshiva students) of Aish HaTorah in Jerusalem and Austin, Texas.

Following the publication of the rabbinical court ruling, Tamara Schoor, Pogrow’s former student, welcomed the decision but said the ruling had been “a long-time coming” and that the rabbinical court “should have addressed this a long time ago, but better late than never.”

Schoor told the press she met Pogrow at the age of 15 when “the process of grooming and manipulation began.”

She was introduced by a camp counselor who had been in contact with Pogrow while she was at Michlala, and was told the rabbi would be able to help her regarding questions about Judaism and religious faith.

Schoor would meet with Pogrow in New York at his mother’s house and he built up a mentor relationship with her over several years.

When Schoor came to Israel to study at Michlala at the age of 18, she made contact with Pogrow again, and would often meet with him at his home in Beit Shemesh, where she was also a frequent guest for Shabbat.

“Over the course of my year of religious study in Israel, he carefully broke down my personal boundaries, creating a high level of dependence and isolation, ensuring I was fully reliant on him for spiritual guidance, love and support,” she said. “Alone in a foreign country, he became my mentor, role model and family. A brilliant manipulator, he was able to convince me that his sole intention was to care for and empower me and my every action.”

Schoor said it took years for her to recognize and accept the insidious mind games, betrayal of trust and carefully orchestrated destruction of her innocence.

“It was only when I became aware of the existence of other victims that I was determined to take action and prevent additional abuse. I began a campaign of phone calls and emails, reaching out to anyone I could identify in the hopes of finding additional victims to speak out with and a safe and reliable method of publicizing it anonymously.

“But at every turn a door closed: victims afraid to be exposed, rabbis finding excuses not to address it, organizations lying to protect themselves and much more.”

Posted in Abuse, Rabbis | Comments Off on A plea from the brother and victim of a predator

Lightning Rod Pro-Hillary Clinton Super PAC Is Mostly Backed by Jewish Donors

Forward, Feb. 12, 2016: The largest super PAC backing Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential race is turning its fire on rival Bernie Sanders — and it’s doing it with Jewish money.
At least eight of the top 12 donors the pro-Clinton Priorities USA Action are Jewish — and one more is married to a Jew. Jews have contributed over half of the $41 million raised so far by the super PAC.
Though the group had planned to save its money for the general election, Priorities will now spend millions in upcoming primaries to promote early voting among groups likely to back Clinton, and to run pro-Clinton ads in South Carolina, according to a report in the Washington Post.

Posted in Hillary Clinton, Jews | Comments Off on Lightning Rod Pro-Hillary Clinton Super PAC Is Mostly Backed by Jewish Donors

THE VERY JEWISH LOVE STORY BEHIND ERICH SEGAL’S ‘LOVE STORY’

Tablet: How the famed writer’s unrequited passion for Janet Sussman led to the era-defining best-seller, and how Segal, who died six years ago this week, never got over her.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on THE VERY JEWISH LOVE STORY BEHIND ERICH SEGAL’S ‘LOVE STORY’