Washington Post: The 35-minute audio recording, as described in a Maryland courtroom Thursday, was horrifying.
“Hold her down,” a young man said.
The voice belonged to Cecil Burrows, 23, who was sentenced to 18 months in jail for his role in what prosecutors described as a gang rape of a nearly comatose woman in a townhouse in the Montgomery County community of Olney. Burrows not only recorded the rape, he called out instructions.
The Daily Caller just published an objective essay on the Alt-Right!
Hillary is correct, though, that this new movement from the right has emerged from the fringes of society. All effective counter-cultural movements do. This is where the deplorables all hang out. It is also where the ideas which are forbidden by the leftist establishment emerge, develop and organise. The alt-right does not have a single philosophy. Instead it is a multi-pronged intellectual attack upon the legitimacy of the ruling establishment in the West. This philosophical diversity is key to its strength.
There are several core tenets of alt-right thinking, however, which unify the different factions within the movement. Key to these is realism when it comes to race, gender, culture and beliefs. Despite the histrionics of the leftist establishment, these views have not been considered controversial historically. For everyone except postmodern Cultural Marxists, it is obvious that there are distinct differences between the races and between the sexes. Some cultures are obviously more successful at creating civilisation than others. If it is sexist that women bear the primary responsibility for raising progeny, then biology is sexist. If it is racist that East Asians have higher IQ’s, lower crime rates and higher incomes than Sub-Saharan Africans, then genetics is racist. Even if reality hurts your feelings, it’s still reality.
It has also been true throughout history that humans prefer their own tribe. Leftists today don’t mind ethnic nationalism, as long as it is not whites adopting it. Why is it that Black Lives Matter, a group associated with domestic terrorism who are clearly ethnic nationalists, are feted at the White House while white nationalists are profiled by the authorities and castigated in the media? Why is the demographic displacement of whites through mass immigration and the destruction of white cultures official government policy in Western countries? Why do we lambast this process as cultural genocide when it was done to indigenous peoples but celebrate it as diversity when it is done to whites?
Common across the component factions of the alt-right movement is also the belief that moral relativism and cultural universalism are destroying the West. Emerging over time from a distortion of the Christian principle of universal brotherhood, this practice by Westerners of denying themselves the right to in-group preference has emboldened our historical enemies and convinced them we are weak. Alt-right thinkers understand that all the aircraft carriers and ICBM’s in the world matter little if a society does not have the cultural confidence to assert its values and promote its identity to foreigners inside and outside its borders. Such a demoralized nation is not long for this world.
Many in the emerging right are former libertarians, and retain the views that the state is never to be trusted and that fascism and national socialism were movements of the left, not the right. The traditional right that these reactionary men and women would revive draws its ideas from such thinkers as Thomas Carlyle, Julius Evola, Bertrand de Jouvenel and Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn. They reject majoritarian democracy and advocate formal hierarchy, moral order and the aspiration to higher ideals that metaphysical faith provides societies. They abhor the debased materialism and worship of abstract ideals that characterises modernity. Critics might dismiss this as mere nostalgia; it is not. Instead it is a love for one’s people and the desire to see them be great again. It is more than a political slogan. It is the rekindling of beliefs which many in the West have forgotten.
The alt-right is edgier than conservatism. It is more aggressive and assertive. That’s the point. Right-thinking men and women of the West now have nothing to lose. It is in such circumstances that minds are quickened and hearts are steeled. They see an establishment which is corrupt, degenerate and morally bankrupt. They are not at all interested in conserving it.
Moses Apostaticus is a PhD Candidate (Education) at a major Australian university and is a known voice in the alt-right sphere.
Chaim Amalek writes: Stop saying things like “I wish television and music and the NBA were more friendly to White People”. Such blunt racial talk only marks you as “to be destroyed” by your enemies. Instead, do what we others do and use a special language that can’t so easily be attacked. I suggest you appropriate the language of that group that more than any other, has succeeded in advancing its agenda in America: Torah Yidden. Their word for things, people and places that are most like them and comforting (none of this “diversity” mishigas) is “heimishe”. It literally means “homey” in Yiddish but in fact means “culturally acceptable to Torah observant orthodox as it would have been 100 years ago in the Old Country”. Appropriate it! So now you can say to other goyim “I wish the NBA were more heimishe….I wish TV/celebrities/corporations/TV ads were more heimishe” and everyone in your target audience will know what you mean to say. And unlike you, Goy, your enemies will be at a loss for the right words with which to attack you.
In my previous post, Sex and the Alexander Technique – Part 1, I provided an overview of what was available on this topic 20 years ago.
Slim pickings, to say the least!
Fortunately for all of us, the situation is a far better today.
To start with, we have a very popular episode at the Alexander Technique Podcast which I did with Alexander Technique teacher Constance Clare-Newman on the topic a few years ago. You can listen to it here:
In 2010, The Frisky (sic!) featured an interview with Alexander Technique teacher Rachel Bernsen titled: Frisky Q & A: For Better Sex, Look to the Alexander Technique that received a good deal of attention.
Also in 2010, Alexander Technique teacher Penny O’Connor write a piece titled “Sex and the Alexander Technique” in her blog.
In 2011, Alexander Technique teacher Paige McKinney explored the question “So what about the Alexander Technique and Sex?” in her blog.
Finally, Alexander Technique Chloe Stallibrass, conducted a study titled “Sexuality and the Alexander technique: a study based on a survey of teachers and students at an Alexander training centre in London,” summer 1990.
Knightley has made the most of what she has simply by staying thin. Because she’s thin, her eyes are large, her cheekbones are prominent, and her jawline is well-defined. And that’s often what beauty boils down to.
Roughly 75% of people — both men and women — would look good if they were the right weight. That means carving themselves down to perfection.
