NYT: Chicago Hate Crime Wasn’t Anti-white or Anti-Trump, It Was Anti-intellectually-disabled

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Totem-Pole theory explains America.

Blacks sit on the top of the Totem Pole. The mentally handicapped come a few icons down – below women.

* I don’t think the NYT ever did get around to reporting that Kitty Genovese was murdered by a black sexual savage. After all, who wanted to kill the feel good buzz of liberals in 1964 so soon after the self-congratulatory march on DC by so many thousands of apologists for black social dysfunction demanding the federal codification of black privilege. Instead, the NYT blamed Kitty’s death on sleeping white neighbors and invented the so-called “bystander effect.”

* No, gays sit on the top, followed by Jews (obviously there is a lot of overlap). In fact, I can remember the exact moment gays displaced blacks in the number one slot; when Obama announced his party was going to push for gay marriage to a crowd of Black pastors, and told them to get with the program or their gravy train ends. They looked so crestfallen, haha.

* So they’re saying disabled people get kidnapped and tortured for days on end all of the time without having it recorded? That’s not very plausible. Note the mentality of the perps where tormenting a captive white person is such great fun and sport that they thought sharing the experience with their homies was a good idea, earning them status points within their community. Reflects badly on the black mentality so lets steer attention away from the fact this was a group effort with a larger audience in the background watching and being amused.

The black police chief didn’t want to state the obvious and waffled on calling it a hate crime. The new State’s Attorney is a black woman who campaigned on fairer treatment for black criminals and who has no experience in running anything let alone such a large organization so not much can be expected from them. Last night’s television news and today’s print media featured an important story about how a Dairy Queen franchise owner in Zion used a racial slur against a querulous black customer. Protest and boycott called for and headquarters is moved to act. This is big news, someone called someone else a name. Just bring up a bunch of these stories along with the hoax crimes and the original story can be crowded out. Big media have gotten really shameless.

* Please. Let’s keep this in perspective. The NYT deserves a bit more credit. The perps were just “having some fun with a retard”, that’s all. Ghetto Negros do it all the time to each other. On a daily basis. Brutally establishing dominance (and enforcing submission in others) is hardwired in them. Sensing weakness in an instant and making a quick bite at the throat is an irresistible impulse. It’s actually beneficial to them: the attack on the white boy likely boosted the perps’ testosterone levels and increased their Darwinian fitness.

The reason Chicago cops, politicians, reporters and activists didn’t hyperventilate over this incident is because they know this on a visceral level. They live it every single day. From their experience (700 Chicago homicides, 4500 Chicago shootings in 2016), this white boy got off easy.

Accept Negros as they are for what they are and avoid them. You will be much happier. They will be happier, too … and you won’t go bankrupt trying to change them into ersatz white folks. It’s a waste of time, money and angst. I call it respecting Human Bio-Diversity.

* Society will continue to see crimes like this until the average person wises up and learns the same information about sociopaths that psychologists have known since the 1960s. They have no conscience and are not reformable. Generally, they’re committing serious crimes by their mid-to-late teens, and they often start committing felonies before they’ve reached legal age. Jailing them is a waste of time and money. We would be better off executing them, but soggy modern sentiment says it’s horrible to execute kids who commit vile acts even though these kids will never be anything except monsters. The best way to deal with it is to abort them before they’re ever been born. This is why the Republican plan to defund Planned Parenthood is asinine. We’re going to have an explosion of black crime several years down the line when the little black thugs grow up if we ban black abortion.

People say broken families breed crime. That’s wrong. They need to go a generation further back. There’s something very obvious here that just isn’t occurring to people. Two people who decide to have sex without birth control and who don’t give a damn that they have a kid, and who don’t give a damn about supporting that kid by getting jobs are sociopaths. Sociopaths are obsessed with indulging themselves with life’s pleasures and they have zero sense of responsibility. That’s classic sociopathic behavior. When two parents carry these genes, they pass them onto their kid. When the kid commits crimes, the kid is just expressing the parents’ sociopathic genes, and these genes have been in their bloodlines for thousands upon thousands of generations. Blacks in America are barbaric, and so are blacks in Africa. No one should be surprised by this.

The only solution is to abort any kid in the womb with a father who refuses to hang around and support that kid, and sterilize that mother. That’s the only way to get these detrimental sociopathic genes out of the human bloodline. We need to think in very practical, genetic terms here.

Posted in America, Blacks | Comments Off on NYT: Chicago Hate Crime Wasn’t Anti-white or Anti-Trump, It Was Anti-intellectually-disabled

Will There Be A Coup Against Trump?

I was talking to friends:

* It appears that although there is a shrill not insubstantial minority of Democrats who want to go down fighting against Donald Trump, Trump is consolidating his position and even a majority of Democrats want him to succeed. Today Elon Musk is meeting with Bannon and Miller who are Trump’s top policy guys. Since most of Musk’s ongoing business (Tesla, Space and Solar) have substantial subsidies from the Federal government, I would imagine that Musk is taking the position that he is helping America lead the way in innovative technology and that the government should continue its favorable policies toward Musk’s enterprises for the prestige involved.

* Some observers (Paul Craig Roberts for example) believe that the actions since the election against Trump are designed not just to discredit Trump and to undermine his legitimacy, but as a precursor to a coup. Certainly the leaks from the intelligence community about Russian involvement in the election are designed to imply (a) that but for the hacking of Podesta’s emails (which are conflated to “hacking the election” which has led a majority of Democrats to believe the Russians actually interfered tabulating the votes cast so as to insure Trump’s victory) Trump would have lost the election and (b) that Trump is a traitor because (i) he may have cooperated with or had knowledge of what the Russians were doing and (ii) he has cast doubt on the both the motives and conclusions of the intelligence agencies. There is a great deal of information out there that suggests that the emails were not hacked by the Russians, that the leaks are politically motivated and that the timing of the blame cast on Russia is designed to cause Trump problem by splitting him off from the zealous anti Russian wing of the Republican party exemplified by Lindsay Graham and John McCain. In any event, one has to wonder how such a coup could take place. The easiest way to engineer a coup would be for Trump to be killed. Perhaps this is the reason that Trump has retained his private security services in addition to the Secret Service protection he gets.

Certainly Mike Pence is not someone who shares many policy positions with Trump and would govern in a markedly different way, probably along the lines of how he has governed in Indiana, in other words what now passes for traditionally conservative in the Republican party, a mix of Koch Brothers anti regulatory libertarianism, Paul Ryan budget cutting of entitlements and tax cuts for the wealthy, and the chamber of commerce positions on immigration and TPP. However, if sufficient “evidence” surfaces that Trump is in fact a traitor, it would not be that much of a stretch for Obama to invoke his powers as commander in chief, to put the country under martial law to prevent Trump from succeeding him. To that extent Trump has helped himself by respected Generals to top positions, notably Mattis as secretary of defense. Trump did get huge cheers when he attended the army navy game and he is much more popular than Obama among the troops. Obama has purged many generals and put in generals who are more aligned with him politically, but I cannot see them falling into line on something as serious as martial law whose purpose is to prevent Trump from becoming president.

* It is pretty funny watching the news media oppose and attempt to diminish everything Trump has done. When American companies have decided to expand here and bring foreign operations home, and foreign companies have decided to invest here, Trump’s influence in those decisions is played down. Trump is also criticized for interfering in the free market. These are not positions the press would ever take with a Democrat. When the Republicans pulled their bill to gut the independent ethics watchdog only after Trump tweeted against it, his involvement was played down as made only after Congress decide to withdraw the bill (false) and only after public opinion forced his hand. Again, the press would not take this position had the party been the Democrats

Posted in America | Comments Off on Will There Be A Coup Against Trump?

Mike Enoch and Andrew Anglin talk to Richard Spencer about his Texas A&M event.

This is a darkly funny podcast from Dec. 20.

I thought there would be more hatred of Jews on the show with the Daily Stormer but that is hardly mentioned.

Richard Spencer: “The first time a goy defeated a Jew in a verbal duel in 200 years.”

Andrew Anglin: “Even Hitler lamented that he couldn’t defeat a Jew in a verbal argument.”

Southern Poverty Law Center: Richard Spencer seems to have given up on putting a spin for reporters on what happened during the National Policy Institute conference last month, when his supporters responded to a toast by throwing stiff-arm Nazi salutes to the stage with cries of “Hail Trump!”

In the media maelstrom that followed, Spencer was quick to dismiss criticisms that his suit-and-tie class of racists had gone fall-on Nazi by claiming the salutes were simply a misunderstood expression of “exuberance and irony.” But it’s almost impossible to believe that now.

Last week, Spencer sat down for an interview with two leading extremists on the “Alt-Right”: Mike Enoch who runs TheRightStuff.biz blog and Andrew Anglin, whose website The Daily Stormer –– a site that has surpassed the popularity long held by Don Black’s Stormfront –– traffics in endlessly vile anti-Semitic memes and heralds President-elect Donald Trump as “Our Glorious Leader.” The interview was posted on Enoch’s blog under the title “Between Two Lampshades,” a crude reference to the post-World War II myth that the skin of victims of the Buchenwald concentration camp had been used to make lampshades.

Calling the interview the first meeting of the “The Triumvirate,” the conversation turns on discussing their hopes for a new America under Trump and the possibilities of an ethnostate that would halt illegal immigration and give way to an all-out assault on immigration from any non-European nation. (It’s worth noting that all three are in favor of eugenics and IQ tests to determine the suitability of people to be citizens.)

In clear terms, the interview was a public relations effort for the newly united front between Spencer, a trust fund beneficiary, Anglin, an internet troll known for bragging in a video leaked online about his “jailbait,” Filipino girlfriend, and an obscure New York blogger who frequently appears on Spencer’s podcast. But Spencer seems to be willing to forge an alliance with the very factions of the Alt-Right he has tried to distance himself from using his family’s wealth and his own educational pedigree.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Richard Spencer | Comments Off on Mike Enoch and Andrew Anglin talk to Richard Spencer about his Texas A&M event.

Republicans, Democrats & Zionists

Paul Gottfried writes:

Lately I’ve been watching the blossoming lovefest between the conservative-Republican establishment and those on the Left who are raging over the Obama administration’s reaction to the UN resolution against Israel. Arguably, this resolution was an attempt to take away Israel’s bargaining chips in negotiating with the Palestinians. The UN Security Council, which passed the resolution, made unmistakably clear that Israel is illegally occupying both East Jerusalem and the territory on the West Bank that had been taken during the Six Day War. The resolution may also have the effect of justifying terrorist acts designed to dislodge Israelis from areas that they’re no longer supposed to be occupying. Finally it challenges Israeli claims to East Jerusalem, although there is no chance that the Israeli government will acquiesce in making Jerusalem once again a divided city.

Although some of the reactions coming from Republican publicists and politicians have bordered on the hysterical or histrionic, I won’t disagree that the US might have done better by not lobbying for the troublesome resolution, which it appears is the case. And I wouldn’t question the view of the Israeli Premier that the Trump administration would have handled the resolution differently. Trump undoubtedly would have taken a different course, as he indicated in a tweet. But to move on to other matters: I’m appalled by how Fox-news and other disseminators of GOP party-lines have been fawning on leftist politicians and celebrities who share their “indignation” over the Obama administration’s treatment of the Israeli premier. Since the passage of the fateful resolution, we’ve been inundated by expressions of friendship from GOP celebrities for liberal Democrats who have now turned against Obama. For example, Chuck Schumer, Elliot Engel, and Kirsten Gillibrand are all outraged by how the outgoing president has turned on the “only democracy in the Middle East.” As a sign of the new relationship between us and them, we were treated last week on Fox news to a bathetic interview with a longtime political leftist and a bosom buddy of Obama, Alan Dershowitz. In this memorable interview Dershowitz explained how the President betrayed the Jewish people after assuring him that “I’ll have the back of Israel.” This may have been one of the great acting moment in the life of a seventy-eight year old courtroom performer. And the people in the studio were lapping it up.

Let me point out the obvious. Those who are being celebrated by Fox News, New York Post, and Wall Street Journal are mostly Democratic politicians representing heavily or disproportionately Jewish constituencies. Their reaction to what happened with the UN resolution was as predictable as the fact that North Carolina Senators vote for tobacco subsidies. Alan Dershowitz throughout his career has been a left-leaning Democrat but also a committed Zionist. Only a fool would have expected him not to take the side of Israel, even against a left liberal administration that he has tirelessly defended. Why the interviewer on Fox-news and her colleagues were awash in compassion for Dershowitz as he whined on about how Obama let him down, is something I still can’t get my head around.

Do Republican commentators and TV producers really think they can make pals of liberal Democrats simply because they all oppose the UN resolution on Israel? If that is the case, then these Republicans must be hopeless fools. Once the Obama administration’s failure to veto that resolution fades from the news, Schumer, Dershowitz and the other protestors will become the relentless opponents of the heartless, xenophobic, homophobic, racist Republicans once again. Don’t expect them to assist the Trump administration in replacing Obamacare or support the candidates for the Supreme Court whom President Trump will likely nominate. And because Schumer and the others are accidentally taking the same side on the UN resolution as Evangelical Christians, don’t expect them to respect the religious liberties of those who out of conscience refuse to cater gay weddings. Needless to say, these pro-Israel Democrats will be hot to trot for allowing men who have just changed their gender preference to enter shower facilities previously reserved for young women.

Posted in America, Israel | Comments Off on Republicans, Democrats & Zionists

Australian Conservatism after Abbott: The Need for Social Movements

Frank Salter writes:

Following the replacement of Tony Abbott by Malcolm Turnbull as prime minister, some conservatives are asking what can be done to recover political influence. What can they do to make a conservative leader again?

The question is predicated on the dubious premise that the Abbott government was in fact conservative. They were better economic managers than Labor, but beyond that their conservatism was ambivalent at best. On most of the big conservative issues they failed abysmally. Yes, they stopped the (illegal migrant) boats, and that was important, but they acquiesced or actually participated in what Greg Sheridan describes as the “cultural genocide” of Anglo Australia.1 Tony Abbott’s alleged conservatism rested to a significant extent on his supposed Anglophilia. But conservative do not kill the thing they love.

I

Immigration and Refugees

As a minister in the Howard government, 1996-2007, and as Prime Minister from 2013 to 2015, Tony Abbott supported a non-discriminatory immigration policy that has helped reduce Australia’s Anglo and Western character and introduce the many ills of “diversity.” This would be understandable for a revolutionary intent on destroying national identity and cohesion in order to break resistance to some utopian scheme. But no conservative worthy of the name, in any country, is willing to remove immigration restriction, for to do so is to break tradition, continuity and cohesion. Tony Abbott and his mentor, former Prime Minister John Howard, became radicalised on immigration policy in the 1990s, and Australia is suffering the consequences.

Posted in Australia | Comments Off on Australian Conservatism after Abbott: The Need for Social Movements