75% of black California boys don’t meet state reading standards

Los Angeles Daily News:

Across ethnicities and economic status, girls outperform boys on English in standardized tests

Three of four African-American boys in California classrooms failed to meet reading and writing standards on the most recent round of testing, according to data obtained from the state Department of Education and analyzed by CALmatters.

More than half of black boys scored in the lowest category on the English portion of the test, trailing their female counterparts. The disparity reflects a stubbornly persistent gender gap in reading and writing scores that stretches across ethnic groups.

Literacy Rates By Race

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on 75% of black California boys don’t meet state reading standards

Haaretz, I Didn’t Call for the Wholesale Killing of All Palestinians

Every victimology has a nationalism and every nationalism contains the capacity for genocide. I love the honesty and realism of the following essay:

Haaretz: Israeli lawmaker Bezalel Smotrich: Any option leaving in place an Arab collective with national aspirations that contradict our own would only perpetuate the conflict.

Haaretz has lost its way in the past several weeks, or perhaps it’s not something that happened recently: Identification with the narrative of the enemy and the instinctive antagonism, to the point of hatred, of anything that hints of nationalism have driven its writers mad. This time I was the pretext for the outburst of memories from the terrible days of World War II (“The Israel lawmaker heralding genocide against Palestinians,” Daniel Blatman, May 23; “Smotrich as a sign of things to come,” Zeev Sternhell, May 26, Hebrew edition).

It began with the groundless accusation that I had called for the systematic killing of women and children (“Why religious Zionism is growing darker,” Tomer Persico, May 17). It never happened. It was based on a distorted, tendentious leak by a participant in a closed meeting in which I explained my political philosophy. She made the accusation in a Facebook post; people who consider themselves serious, including some professors, fell for this nonsense and built entire theories and interpretations upon it. I hope Prof. Sternhell’s academic research is founded on more-solid facts and figures.

What did I say? I said that in the Land of Israel, two contradictory national aspirations dwell together, and that the entire foundation for defining the Palestinian national movement relies on the negation of the Zionist movement. The Palestinian national movement was established as a countermovement to Zionism movement, and so the right of the Palestinian “nation” to exist is based in the denial of Israel’s existence as a Jewish state. That is why the chances of reaching a peace agreement with the Palestinians, based on the continued existence of these two conflicting national aspirations by means of an artificial geographical division and on Palestinian recognition of the Jewish state, is virtually nil.

On the practical level, that is the fundamental difference between me and the left. The left buries its head in the sand, believing these contradictory aspirations can be reconciled, while I do not. The reality of recent decades supports my viewpoint. We have always extended our hand in peace; they have always rejected it at the moment of truth: the 1947 United Nations partition plan, the Oslo Accords, Camp David and then-Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s negotiations. That is no coincidence: If they recognize us they will pull out the rug from under their right to exist as a national entity.
Given the fact that these are two contradictory national aspirations, we have two options: to continue the bloody conflict for another 100 years, or to decide it. Hence my plan, which is first and foremost one of political consciousness. I want to etch into the consciousness of the other side the understanding that there is no chance an Arab state will be established in the Land of Israel, through the “settlement solution.” When we impose sovereignty over Judea and Samaria, create additional settlements there and bring in hundreds of thousands more settlers, the Arabs will realize that it’s irreversible, that their dream is over.
There are two possible human responses to this unambiguous situation: The realists will understand and accept it, while the “Don Quixotes” will try to fight it. The realists will also fall into two groups: those who accept the reality will also be divided into two groups: those who choose to remain and to enjoy a personal life far superior to that of Arabs in neighboring states, and those who will not relinquish their national aspirations and will choose to fulfill them in one of the Arab states or in any other country.
Those who refuse to accept the new reality and choose to fight it through violence will encounter the “military solution,” in the form of a determined Israeli army with a mandate from the political leaders to achieve victory and to eliminate terror. There is nothing more just and moral than Israel’s right to defend itself against those who would destroy it. Would such a war require indiscriminate total slaughter? Of course not. You’d have to be a total fool to think that. Those who remain won’t be forced to sing the national anthem. All they need do is not to take up arms.

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on Haaretz, I Didn’t Call for the Wholesale Killing of All Palestinians

The Alt Right Case For ISIS

Greg Ritter says on this May 28 podcast with Richard Spencer and company: “Are we against ISIS?”

Richard: “Yes.”

Greg: “Are we sure? Really? The Alt Right case for ISIS, I want to start this right now. ISIS is the normal expression of the demographic and ethnographical reality of northern Mesopatamia.”

Richard: “I agree. Why are we forcing European standards of sovereign states on to these people when ISIS is a more natural way of ordering the region? Assad is the exception, not the rule. Assad is a European-style effectively white leader.”

Greg: “Having him rule over Eastern Syria is crazy because they are totally different from the western parts of Syria.”

Richard: “That’s the case for not caring.”

Another panelist: “The destabilization of this region has led hordes of them into Europe, our ancestral homeland.”

Richard: “The case for ISIS narrative. I can’t go there.”

Greg: “You’ve been brainwashed by the mainstream media.”

Posted in Alt Right, ISIS | Comments Off on The Alt Right Case For ISIS

The Holocaust As Religion

In a May 26 podcast, Richard Spencer says: “The Jews want the Holocaust to be the center of global morality and to have this concept of genocide on everyone’s minds but you can’t have an equal genocide [to the Holocaust]. The Poles, the Holodomor can’t have an equal genocide. We’ll acknowledge your genocide but it can’t be the big kahuna of genocides. The Holocaust is the center of our moral nature.”

Spectre: “The modern religion of the left is multiculturalism and its birth and resurrection was the Holocaust. In the same way that in the 1950s, you would not publicly trash Christian beliefs. Now comedians can trash these beliefs without consequences… If you question multiculturalism today, that’s bad, goy, it’s two steps away from Auschwitz.”

Richard: “It’s original sin. And we must always remember the death of this messianic thing that is the Holocaust.”

Spectre: “You ask the average American how many people died in the Holocaust and they can tell you without blinking, six million. How many Americans died in WWII? I don’t know.”

Richard: “It peaked with the boomers. I had ten teenager years in the 1990s and that was the bonanza of the Holocaust industry. Every week there was a new documentary, film, book… My mom was in this book club with other upper middle-class women and every book they read was related to the Holocaust. There were other things that happened in history. It’s not the center of the universe. You don’t need to deny a single death, but you’re not burdened by it.”

Posted in Holocaust | Comments Off on The Holocaust As Religion

Gay Men’s Chorus of Washington travels to Ukraine

Can you imagine Ukraine’s excitement?

Washington Blade: “The Gay Men’s Chorus of Washington has sent its small ensemble, Potomac Fever, on a State Department-sponsored diplomacy tour to promote LGBTQ rights in Ukraine.”

Perhaps we should send this choir to London to buck up people’s spirits?

Greg Ritter says on this May 28 podcast with Richard Spencer and company: “I talked to this American military officer who had been to the Ukraine and he said that about a year ago, the State Department had brought the Gay Men’s choir of Washington to Kiev to perform for the Ukrainian troops and the Ukrainians were so pissed off that these faggots were in their country and that the Americans thought this would be the appropriate doffing of the hat to them. It was America slapping its tranny dick across to their face. ‘Hey fags, you’re gonna die for neo-liberalism. Now watch this faggy choir and get some morale.'”

Posted in Homosexuality | Comments Off on Gay Men’s Chorus of Washington travels to Ukraine