Jews Vs. Nazis, Torah Vs Mein Kampf

Listen here. More. More.

Isaiah 2:4: “And He shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.”

Comments:

* “Great show today Luke. That might be your niche — your outrageous question delivered with that stone faced sincerity is fantastic.”

* “I want to thank Luke for providing me and other low-IQ individuals with his take on what’s going on in the world. Your persona really resonates with me and people of my ilk. Luke is to the low-IQ community what Alex Jones is to the world of conspiracy.”

* “I don’t see you appealing to the low IQ crowd at all. Dumb people couldn’t sit and listen to a several hour stream where you parse narratives that involve obscure historical details. And I have no idea how anybody could compare you to Alex Jones. You seem to be more like a tragic figure, like a male Cassandra. You see the clashes ahead but can’t really do much to mitigate the damage. I do see you serving a role for us though. I suspect you will soften some of the sharp edges of the Alt-right if you push more interaction. You should go on the Daily Shoah.”

* “Your answer was good — about communism ending eventually in Russia. But really I’m trying to project what would’ve happened in Germany if Hitler hadn’t gone full Hitler. My guess is they’d have endured about two generations where Divorce became legal, and intermarriage, and open borders, gay rights, trannies… and THEN somebody else would’ve finally gone full Hitler. It’s like the only way to end Marxism is to fight back.”

Source: Why did Hitler hate the jews? By Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi and Rabbi Yosef Tzvi ben Porat. 16 min:

We didn’t receive the curriculum. They didn’t teach them even in high education. I gave lectures in front of history professors. Why really (did) Hitler hate the Jews? What did he want from them? How did they bother him? But it’s all written here in Mein Kampf. This book was published only recently, it just got approved to be translated into Hebrew (my language). It was forbidden all these years. But there is an earlier translation made by Yad Vashem. Hitler claims in his book, that Jews are communists. They made the Russian Revolution. They killed there 30 million Russians (Alex. Solzhenitsyn claims 66 million.) All the intelligent ones, in a cruel and horrific way, and that’s their plan for the entire world. The next country in line is Germany. They founded the German communist and socialist parties, and that’s true. “If we don’t defeat them now, they will eliminate us, and they will slaughter another 20 million, all the intelligent people.” And that’s how they went from country to country. So eventually the only intelligent ones remaining would be the Jews. And he (Hitler) repeats it many times, make no mistake. And he is right.

The Russian Revolution was made by the Jews. The Russian Army was built by Trotsky, who was an incredible genius, an anti-semite like no other. He created the Jewish division of the (Russian) Communist Party, which members informed on their father, mother, brother and son, whoever owns a Siddur or even a Hebrew learning book, I’m not even talking about Tefilin and Mikveh. He (Trotsky) destroyed everything by the Jews, but for sure, by the Russians. In the first picture of the Russian government, out of 13 members, 6 were Jews. Who founded the KGB? Jews. So everything is clearly written. He (Hitler) didn’t hate the Jews because they had “Peos”, he didn’t hate them for observing Mitzvoth, (he hated them) because they are communists. He writes it clearly: “The Jews destroyed religion and faith.” They spread in Germany the heresy in G-d.” That’s how he writes… “I feel like the messenger of G-d to exterminate the Jews, because they don’t believe in Him.” (Hitler) writes this (in Mein Kampf).

Now you understand why they don’t teach (the book) in schools? Because who writes the curriculum?… those same Leftists. Of course they will not write that Hitler wanted to kill the Jews because they are the forefathers of the Left, and of Marxism, of Communism and Leninism. But that’s what Hitler writes. They (Jews) destroyed all the values (Weimar republic). Poisoned literature and theater. Who did that? Torah-obervant Jews poisoned the German theater?

Out of 9 large German newspapers 7 were owned by Jews. There was one of the great composers, Wagner, whose pieces are still forbidden to be played, up until now he is banned (in Israel). Because he was anti-semite, long before the NAZI era. I was very interested to know what (Wagner) really said. So the Hebrew University published his book translated to Hebrew. He writes this: “I don’t like the Jews. The religious ones, I don’t like them. But what do I care? The Jews who left the Torah and the Mitzvoth, and look like the gentiles, I hate. Because they merge into our society, and destroy our culture and poetry, and the German being. Those who converted to Christianity, I see them as 5th column. Traitors that are going to destroy the German nation, if we don’t defend ourselves of them from now, they will finish us. Because they are disguised to Germans, but they are not Germans, they are (still) Jews. (it happened in medieval Spain too)”

So do you understand why it is forbidden here (Israel) to teach about him (Hitler or Wagner) and what he says? Just how everyone here hates the Nuremberg Laws without even knowing them. (Rabbi makes derisive gesture.) Nuremberg said that a Jew can’t marry a gentile, so for sure the schools here call it racism. To say that a Jew is different than a gentile is racism, here in this state, unfortunately. Nuremberg just copied what’s written in the Torah. Wagner just said what’s written in the Torah. That a Jew is a Jew, even if he wears a mask, even if he converts to Christianity. “A Jew who sinned is still a Jew.” (Wagner) writes “You are merciful people. We are cruel people. You destroy our culture.” Yes, that’s how Wagner writes. Therefore his entire book is aimed against the Jewish composer (Felix) Mendelsohn, whose father converted to Christianity, and baptized him in church when he was 5 years old. He (Wagner) writes to him (Mendelsohn): “Listen, do you think that if you speak German, and converted to Christianity, you are German? No! Your poetry is of a crybaby, your music is not authentic, (not German) and you poison our culture, because people think that this is German music. German music is filled with pride, and you can’t do it. And therefore you are called the enemy of German culture.” So isn’t he (Wagner) right? Of course he is right! “You choose us from all the nations”, true, we (Jews) are humble, merciful, shy, indeed. This is our source of pride.

So understand that things didn’t just happen, not a coincidence, it didn’t happen without alerts. “Our sins sent us to exile, out of our land.” And thank G-d we returned (to Israel), and we have to be careful not to repeat the same mistakes, and re-assimilate right here, and give legitimacy to that low self-esteem in front of the gentiles, and the will to be like them. We came to this world to be different, we were created in this world to be Jewish, and our entire purpose is to be with G-d. Whoever really wants to be with G-d, G-d is with him. In any place. In good times and bad, here and also not here, and may it be G-d’s will that G-d will say to our troubles “Enough”. In any form, and in any situation, and in any place, may we have the merit for eternal redemption, and eternal happiness.

Posted in Jews, Nazi | Comments Off on Jews Vs. Nazis, Torah Vs Mein Kampf

Sexual Utopia In Power

Soundcloud MP3.

Sexual Utopia In Power by Roger Devlin:

The attempt to realize a sexual utopia for women was doomed to failure before it began. Women’s wishes aim at the impossible, conflict with one another, and change unpredictably. Hence, any program to force men (or “society”) to fulfill women’s wishes must fail, even if all men were willing to submit to it. Pile entitlement upon entitlement for women, heap punishment after punishment onto men: It cannot work, because women’s wishes will always outpace legislation and lead to new demands.

But while the revolution has not achieved its aims, it has certainly achieved something. It has destroyed monogamy and family stability. It has resulted in a polygamous mating pattern of immodest women aggressively pursuing a small number of men. It has decreased the number of children born, and insured that many who are born grow up without a father in their lives. And, least often mentioned, it has made it impossible for many decent men to find wives.

One occasionally hears of studies purporting to show that men are happier with their “sex lives” than women. It has always struck me as ludicrous that anyone would take such survey results at face value. First, women complain more about everything than men. But second, many men (especially young men) experience a powerful mauvaise honte when they are unsuccessful with women. They rarely compare notes with other men, and still more rarely do so honestly. Everyone puts up a brave front, however lonely he may actually be. Hence, men almost always imagine other men to have greater success with women than is actually the case. This situation has worsened since the 1960s, with the propagation of the illusion that there is “more sex” available to men than formerly.

But if women are only mating with a few exceptionally attractive men, and if many women fail to mate at all, there must be a large number of men unable to get a woman. We might, in the spirit of William Gilmore Simms, term them the forgotten men of the sexual revolution. I have reason to believe that a growing number are willing to come out of the closet (to use a currently popular expression) and admit that, whoever has been doing all the “hooking up” one reads about, it hasn’t been them. Simple prudence dictates that we give some consideration to the situation of these men. In societies where polygamy is openly practiced (e.g., in Africa and the Muslim world), young bachelors tend to form gangs which engage in antisocial behavior: “It is not good for man to be alone.”

Posted in Alt Right, F. Roger Devlin | Comments Off on Sexual Utopia In Power

Jews, Germans & Arabs

Comments: * The Jews ran quite a few “good Arabs,” out of Zion, no? Is that ironic?

* No, it’s completely different. My grandfather had nothing against Germans. He had never met a German in his life. He didn’t want to impose Bolshevism on Germany or anywhere else. As far as he was concerned, he would have been glad (or at worst totally indifferent) if Germany prospered in a peaceful way. There was no zero sum going on between him and Germany. There were no anti-German riots by Jews the way that there were anti-Jewish riots by Arabs in pre-partitionPalestine.

In contrast, even the “good Arabs” of Palestine (and BTW, hundreds of thousands of “good Arabs” stayed and live in Israel to this day) would have preferred that the Jews be gone. Maybe there were a few who didn’t mind or even liked their Jewish neighbors but most, especially those who left, if you had given them a choice, saying “If a genie could make all the Jews disappear from Palestine and return all of it to the Daar al Islam, would you want him to do it?”, most of them would have said yes. Most of them, to this day would STILL say yes.

* The Caucasian economic system is going to be playing second fiddle to the Mongoloid economic system. Jews are Caucasians so their fortunes depend on the fate of other Caucasians.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Jews, Germans & Arabs

Jews, Capitalism & Usury

Dutch posts: “The real opprobrium earned by the Jews was their association with the usury that underpins Capitalism. It can make you rich but will also make you hated.”

I remember in high school, I used to lend people money, small amounts like a dollar, and charge them 25% interest when they paid me back the next day.

I wasn’t the most popular kid.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Jews, Capitalism & Usury

Why Do We Take It For Granted That There Are Bad Parts Of Town?

I hear all the time in the United States about how this and that place are a “bad part of town.” And we just accept that is how things are. There are bad parts of town just like there are days when it rains and there’s nothing you can do about it.

Why do we put up with that? Why doesn’t a decent society demand a certain level of decency from people? If people aren’t decent, they should be put on an island and left to their own devices. They certainly should not be allowed to reproduce. They should not be allowed to bother decent people. They should not be allowed to ride public transportation and or visit good parts of town. They have to be segregated.

Decent people won’t ride public transportation if they have a choice so long as public transport is continually ruined by the behavior of the indecent. Decent people won’t send their kids to public schools if these schools are ruined by the indecent.

Different groups have different standards of decency. I think the majority must enforce their own standards of decency on minorities.

I just wish nature provided certain visual cues about who is more likely to engage in criminal and other forms of anti-social behavior. I wish nature color-coded people like it color-codes plants and animals.

Perhaps if it was OK to notice that people with tattoos and certain types of hair and clothing styles are more likely to commit indecent behavior, the decent could enforce sanctions against the bad guys.

I think it is fair to stereotype. Not all groups have identical patterns of behavior. In fact, different races have different gifts. Ideally, a nation consists of primarily one distinct people with a similar genetic, cultural and religious heritage. But if you have a nation like America consisting of many different peoples, then it is fair to start taking sanctions against groups with high crime rates, high welfare rates, low educational attainment rates, high illegitimacy rates. On the other hand, groups demonstrating low crimes rates and high marks of good citizenship should reap the benefits and have more power in society.

I’m tired of hearing about bad parts of town in Los Angeles. Why can’t Los Angeles be awesome everywhere as it was in the 1930s when it was the most Anglo city in the US?

Living in the United States is a privilege and you should lose that privilege for anti-social behavior and be sent to Somalia or Venezuela (pay these countries to take our losers).

Posted in Crime | Comments Off on Why Do We Take It For Granted That There Are Bad Parts Of Town?