Hitler’s Press Criticism

Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf:

I gradually discovered that the Social Democratic Press was predominantly controlled by Jews. But I did not attach special importance to this circumstance, for the same state of affairs existed also in other newspapers. But there was one striking fact in this connection. It was that there was not a single newspaper with which Jews were connected that could be spoken of as National, in the meaning that my education and convictions attached to that word.

…One fact became quite evident to me. It was that this alien race held in its hands the leadership of that Social Democratic Party with whose minor representatives I had been disputing for months past. I was happy at last to know for certain that the Jew is not a German.

When the anti-semite and the philo-semite make the same point — that Jews are a distinctive people wherever they may claim citizenship — then you might be on to something real.

Traditional Eastern European Jews prior to the Holocaust would have told German Jews that they could never be German.

Jews tend not to be nationalists (except that many are Jewish nationalists). For a religious Jew, Torah must come first, not nationalism. However, in America, the gulden medina, many secular Jews are America-First, including leading immigration restrictionists such as Mickey Kaus, Stephen Steinlight, and Stephen Miller.

Isaiah 2:4: “And He shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.”

Source: Why did Hitler hate the jews? By Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi and Rabbi Yosef Tzvi ben Porat. 16 min:

We didn’t receive the curriculum. They didn’t teach them even in high education. I gave lectures in front of history professors. Why really (did) Hitler hate the Jews? What did he want from them? How did they bother him? But it’s all written here in Mein Kampf. This book was published only recently, it just got approved to be translated into Hebrew (my language). It was forbidden all these years. But there is an earlier translation made by Yad Vashem. Hitler claims in his book, that Jews are communists. They made the Russian Revolution. They killed there 30 million Russians (Alex. Solzhenitsyn claims 66 million.) All the intelligent ones, in a cruel and horrific way, and that’s their plan for the entire world. The next country in line is Germany. They founded the German communist and socialist parties, and that’s true. “If we don’t defeat them now, they will eliminate us, and they will slaughter another 20 million, all the intelligent people.” And that’s how they went from country to country. So eventually the only intelligent ones remaining would be the Jews. And he (Hitler) repeats it many times, make no mistake. And he is right.

The Russian Revolution was made by the Jews. The Russian Army was built by Trotsky, who was an incredible genius, an anti-semite like no other. He created the Jewish division of the (Russian) Communist Party, which members informed on their father, mother, brother and son, whoever owns a Siddur or even a Hebrew learning book, I’m not even talking about Tefilin and Mikveh. He (Trotsky) destroyed everything by the Jews, but for sure, by the Russians. In the first picture of the Russian government, out of 13 members, 6 were Jews. Who founded the KGB? Jews. So everything is clearly written. He (Hitler) didn’t hate the Jews because they had “Peos”, he didn’t hate them for observing Mitzvoth, (he hated them) because they are communists. He writes it clearly: “The Jews destroyed religion and faith.” They spread in Germany the heresy in G-d.” That’s how he writes… “I feel like the messenger of G-d to exterminate the Jews, because they don’t believe in Him.” (Hitler) writes this (in Mein Kampf).

Now you understand why they don’t teach (the book) in schools? Because who writes the curriculum?… those same Leftists. Of course they will not write that Hitler wanted to kill the Jews because they are the forefathers of the Left, and of Marxism, of Communism and Leninism. But that’s what Hitler writes. They (Jews) destroyed all the values (Weimar republic). Poisoned literature and theater. Who did that? Torah-obervant Jews poisoned the German theater?

Out of 9 large German newspapers 7 were owned by Jews. There was one of the great composers, Wagner, whose pieces are still forbidden to be played, up until now he is banned (in Israel). Because he was anti-semite, long before the NAZI era. I was very interested to know what (Wagner) really said. So the Hebrew University published his book translated to Hebrew. He writes this: “I don’t like the Jews. The religious ones, I don’t like them. But what do I care? The Jews who left the Torah and the Mitzvoth, and look like the gentiles, I hate. Because they merge into our society, and destroy our culture and poetry, and the German being. Those who converted to Christianity, I see them as 5th column. Traitors that are going to destroy the German nation, if we don’t defend ourselves of them from now, they will finish us. Because they are disguised to Germans, but they are not Germans, they are (still) Jews. (it happened in medieval Spain too)”

So do you understand why it is forbidden here (Israel) to teach about him (Hitler or Wagner) and what he says? Just how everyone here hates the Nuremberg Laws without even knowing them. (Rabbi makes derisive gesture.) Nuremberg said that a Jew can’t marry a gentile, so for sure the schools here call it racism. To say that a Jew is different than a gentile is racism, here in this state, unfortunately. Nuremberg just copied what’s written in the Torah. Wagner just said what’s written in the Torah. That a Jew is a Jew, even if he wears a mask, even if he converts to Christianity. “A Jew who sinned is still a Jew.” (Wagner) writes “You are merciful people. We are cruel people. You destroy our culture.” Yes, that’s how Wagner writes. Therefore his entire book is aimed against the Jewish composer (Felix) Mendelsohn, whose father converted to Christianity, and baptized him in church when he was 5 years old. He (Wagner) writes to him (Mendelsohn): “Listen, do you think that if you speak German, and converted to Christianity, you are German? No! Your poetry is of a crybaby, your music is not authentic, (not German) and you poison our culture, because people think that this is German music. German music is filled with pride, and you can’t do it. And therefore you are called the enemy of German culture.” So isn’t he (Wagner) right? Of course he is right! “You choose us from all the nations”, true, we (Jews) are humble, merciful, shy, indeed. This is our source of pride.

So understand that things didn’t just happen, not a coincidence, it didn’t happen without alerts. “Our sins sent us to exile, out of our land.” And thank G-d we returned (to Israel), and we have to be careful not to repeat the same mistakes, and re-assimilate right here, and give legitimacy to that low self-esteem in front of the gentiles, and the will to be like them. We came to this world to be different, we were created in this world to be Jewish, and our entire purpose is to be with G-d. Whoever really wants to be with G-d, G-d is with him. In any place. In good times and bad, here and also not here, and may it be G-d’s will that G-d will say to our troubles “Enough”. In any form, and in any situation, and in any place, may we have the merit for eternal redemption, and eternal happiness.

Hitler did not believe that diversity was a strength:

More than any other State, the existence of the old Austria depended on a strong and capable Government. The Habsburg Empire lacked ethnical uniformity, which constitutes the fundamental basis of a national State and will preserve the existence of such a State even though the ruling power should be grossly inefficient. When a State is composed of a homogeneous population, the natural inertia of such a population will hold the Stage together and maintain its existence through astonishingly long periods of misgovernment and maladministration. It may often seem as if the principle of life had died out in such a body-politic; but a time comes when the apparent corpse rises up and displays before the world an astonishing manifestation of its indestructible vitality.

But the situation is utterly different in a country where the population is not homogeneous, where there is no bond of common blood but only that of one ruling hand. Should the ruling hand show signs of weakness in such a State the result will not be to cause a kind of hibernation of the State but rather to awaken the individualist instincts which are slumbering in the ethnological groups. These instincts do not make themselves felt as long as these groups are dominated by a strong central will-to-govern. The danger which exists in these slumbering separatist instincts can be rendered more or less innocuous only through centuries of common education, common traditions and common interests. The younger such States are, the more their existence will depend on the ability and strength of the central government. If their foundation was due only to the work of a strong personality or a leader who is a man of genius, in many cases they will break up as soon as the founder disappears; because, though great, he stood alone. But even after centuries of a common education and experiences these separatist instincts I have spoken of are not always completely overcome. They may be only dormant and may suddenly awaken when the central government shows weakness and the force of a common education as well as the prestige of a common tradition prove unable to withstand the vital energies of separatist nationalities forging ahead towards the shaping of their own individual existence.

Torah also does not hold that diversity is a strength as it makes no allowance for non-Jewish citizenship in a Torah state.

Hitler was not a big fan of democracy: “Democracy, as practised in Western Europe to-day, is the fore-runner of Marxism. In fact, the latter would not be conceivable without the former. Democracy is the breeding-ground in which the bacilli of the Marxist world pest can grow and spread. By the introduction of parliamentarianism, democracy produced an abortion of filth and fire, the creative fire of which, however, seems to have died out.”

Posted in Diversity, Jews | Comments Off on Hitler’s Press Criticism

NYT: Is Australia’s Media Too Prudish for a Sex Scandal?

Amelia Lester writes in the New York Times:

Barnaby Joyce was probably the last politician average Australians would expect to be embroiled in a sex scandal. A comparison to Mike Pence isn’t so far-fetched: They’re both second in charge of a conservative government led by a flashy businessman, and standard-bearers for family values, tilled in the nation’s agrarian heartland. For most of the Australian public, Mr. Joyce was a bumbling farm boy who meant well.

Last week, though, a story broke that turned public sentiment against him. Following investigations by two small websites last year, the Sydney-based Daily Telegraph reported that the deputy prime minister was having a child with a former staff member, Vikki Campion. A photo on the front page of the tabloid showed Ms. Campion, pregnant and unwitting, crossing the street. (“Bundle of Joyce” said the headline.) That this story, like so many others, involves personal hypocrisy is hardly surprising. Mr. Joyce has been a strident opponent of gay marriage, basing his opposition in part on what he has called his four daughters’ right to a “secure relationship with a loving husband” and the right of every child “to know her or his mother and father.” What is more noteworthy is the degree to which the Joyce affair has sparked a long-overdue debate about the deference Australian media still accords politicians when it comes to their private lives.

Mr. Joyce’s relationship with Ms. Campion, we’ve learned in the past few days, was an open secret among the Canberra press corps. Back in October, Sharri Markson, the reporter who eventually got the print scoop, wrote a piece alluding to a “deeply personal crisis” in Mr. Joyce’s life. Now that the story’s out there, it’s very easy to read between the lines about “vicious rumors” and “personal pressures” in dozens of media clips from last year. The deputy prime minister’s private situation was well known enough that he got into a pub brawl with a constituent about it last year and apparently knocked the man’s hat off.

Did the media choose not report on Mr. Joyce because they didn’t have all the facts? Perhaps in part. As the national broadsheet The Australian has reported, repeated inquiries about Ms. Campion’s multiple job titles, let alone her taxpayer-funded salary, were met with stonewalling. Mr. Joyce would refuse to talk about the relationship when they asked. (This week, he released a statement denying that the relationship, and Ms. Campion’s employment in the government, breached ministerial rules.) Another major consideration is that Australian journalists face extremely strict libel laws, the kind Donald Trump would appreciate.

Posted in Australia, Journalism | Comments Off on NYT: Is Australia’s Media Too Prudish for a Sex Scandal?

Let’s Learn Alexander Technique!

http://alexander90210.com: Alexander Technique helps us to become aware of how we respond to stimuli and it shows us how to let go of those responses that don’t serve us. For instance, many people get stuck in the fight-or-flight reflex (head thrust forward, shoulders rising up, neck and torso compressed). While that might benefit us in certain emergencies such as when a fist heads towards our face, it does not help us in 99% of life. Instead, it makes movement, thought and emotion more halting.

Almost all head, neck and back pain comes from needless muscular holding, said JFK’s physician Dr. Janet Travell. With Alexander lessons, we can learn about our habits and drop the ones that hurt us.

A person who moves awkwardly is more likely to think and feel awkwardly and to relate to others awkwardly. By contrast, somebody who’s poised will likely connect with others in a poised way. Just ask yourself — would I rather hang out with people filled with weird tension patterns or with those who are at ease?

Posted in Alexander Technique | Comments Off on Let’s Learn Alexander Technique!

Jews Vs. Nazis, Torah Vs Mein Kampf

Listen here. More. More.

Isaiah 2:4: “And He shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore.”

Comments:

* “Great show today Luke. That might be your niche — your outrageous question delivered with that stone faced sincerity is fantastic.”

* “I want to thank Luke for providing me and other low-IQ individuals with his take on what’s going on in the world. Your persona really resonates with me and people of my ilk. Luke is to the low-IQ community what Alex Jones is to the world of conspiracy.”

* “I don’t see you appealing to the low IQ crowd at all. Dumb people couldn’t sit and listen to a several hour stream where you parse narratives that involve obscure historical details. And I have no idea how anybody could compare you to Alex Jones. You seem to be more like a tragic figure, like a male Cassandra. You see the clashes ahead but can’t really do much to mitigate the damage. I do see you serving a role for us though. I suspect you will soften some of the sharp edges of the Alt-right if you push more interaction. You should go on the Daily Shoah.”

* “Your answer was good — about communism ending eventually in Russia. But really I’m trying to project what would’ve happened in Germany if Hitler hadn’t gone full Hitler. My guess is they’d have endured about two generations where Divorce became legal, and intermarriage, and open borders, gay rights, trannies… and THEN somebody else would’ve finally gone full Hitler. It’s like the only way to end Marxism is to fight back.”

Source: Why did Hitler hate the jews? By Rabbi Yosef Mizrachi and Rabbi Yosef Tzvi ben Porat. 16 min:

We didn’t receive the curriculum. They didn’t teach them even in high education. I gave lectures in front of history professors. Why really (did) Hitler hate the Jews? What did he want from them? How did they bother him? But it’s all written here in Mein Kampf. This book was published only recently, it just got approved to be translated into Hebrew (my language). It was forbidden all these years. But there is an earlier translation made by Yad Vashem. Hitler claims in his book, that Jews are communists. They made the Russian Revolution. They killed there 30 million Russians (Alex. Solzhenitsyn claims 66 million.) All the intelligent ones, in a cruel and horrific way, and that’s their plan for the entire world. The next country in line is Germany. They founded the German communist and socialist parties, and that’s true. “If we don’t defeat them now, they will eliminate us, and they will slaughter another 20 million, all the intelligent people.” And that’s how they went from country to country. So eventually the only intelligent ones remaining would be the Jews. And he (Hitler) repeats it many times, make no mistake. And he is right.

The Russian Revolution was made by the Jews. The Russian Army was built by Trotsky, who was an incredible genius, an anti-semite like no other. He created the Jewish division of the (Russian) Communist Party, which members informed on their father, mother, brother and son, whoever owns a Siddur or even a Hebrew learning book, I’m not even talking about Tefilin and Mikveh. He (Trotsky) destroyed everything by the Jews, but for sure, by the Russians. In the first picture of the Russian government, out of 13 members, 6 were Jews. Who founded the KGB? Jews. So everything is clearly written. He (Hitler) didn’t hate the Jews because they had “Peos”, he didn’t hate them for observing Mitzvoth, (he hated them) because they are communists. He writes it clearly: “The Jews destroyed religion and faith.” They spread in Germany the heresy in G-d.” That’s how he writes… “I feel like the messenger of G-d to exterminate the Jews, because they don’t believe in Him.” (Hitler) writes this (in Mein Kampf).

Now you understand why they don’t teach (the book) in schools? Because who writes the curriculum?… those same Leftists. Of course they will not write that Hitler wanted to kill the Jews because they are the forefathers of the Left, and of Marxism, of Communism and Leninism. But that’s what Hitler writes. They (Jews) destroyed all the values (Weimar republic). Poisoned literature and theater. Who did that? Torah-obervant Jews poisoned the German theater?

Out of 9 large German newspapers 7 were owned by Jews. There was one of the great composers, Wagner, whose pieces are still forbidden to be played, up until now he is banned (in Israel). Because he was anti-semite, long before the NAZI era. I was very interested to know what (Wagner) really said. So the Hebrew University published his book translated to Hebrew. He writes this: “I don’t like the Jews. The religious ones, I don’t like them. But what do I care? The Jews who left the Torah and the Mitzvoth, and look like the gentiles, I hate. Because they merge into our society, and destroy our culture and poetry, and the German being. Those who converted to Christianity, I see them as 5th column. Traitors that are going to destroy the German nation, if we don’t defend ourselves of them from now, they will finish us. Because they are disguised to Germans, but they are not Germans, they are (still) Jews. (it happened in medieval Spain too)”

So do you understand why it is forbidden here (Israel) to teach about him (Hitler or Wagner) and what he says? Just how everyone here hates the Nuremberg Laws without even knowing them. (Rabbi makes derisive gesture.) Nuremberg said that a Jew can’t marry a gentile, so for sure the schools here call it racism. To say that a Jew is different than a gentile is racism, here in this state, unfortunately. Nuremberg just copied what’s written in the Torah. Wagner just said what’s written in the Torah. That a Jew is a Jew, even if he wears a mask, even if he converts to Christianity. “A Jew who sinned is still a Jew.” (Wagner) writes “You are merciful people. We are cruel people. You destroy our culture.” Yes, that’s how Wagner writes. Therefore his entire book is aimed against the Jewish composer (Felix) Mendelsohn, whose father converted to Christianity, and baptized him in church when he was 5 years old. He (Wagner) writes to him (Mendelsohn): “Listen, do you think that if you speak German, and converted to Christianity, you are German? No! Your poetry is of a crybaby, your music is not authentic, (not German) and you poison our culture, because people think that this is German music. German music is filled with pride, and you can’t do it. And therefore you are called the enemy of German culture.” So isn’t he (Wagner) right? Of course he is right! “You choose us from all the nations”, true, we (Jews) are humble, merciful, shy, indeed. This is our source of pride.

So understand that things didn’t just happen, not a coincidence, it didn’t happen without alerts. “Our sins sent us to exile, out of our land.” And thank G-d we returned (to Israel), and we have to be careful not to repeat the same mistakes, and re-assimilate right here, and give legitimacy to that low self-esteem in front of the gentiles, and the will to be like them. We came to this world to be different, we were created in this world to be Jewish, and our entire purpose is to be with G-d. Whoever really wants to be with G-d, G-d is with him. In any place. In good times and bad, here and also not here, and may it be G-d’s will that G-d will say to our troubles “Enough”. In any form, and in any situation, and in any place, may we have the merit for eternal redemption, and eternal happiness.

Posted in Jews, Nazi | Comments Off on Jews Vs. Nazis, Torah Vs Mein Kampf

Sexual Utopia In Power

Soundcloud MP3.

Sexual Utopia In Power by Roger Devlin:

The attempt to realize a sexual utopia for women was doomed to failure before it began. Women’s wishes aim at the impossible, conflict with one another, and change unpredictably. Hence, any program to force men (or “society”) to fulfill women’s wishes must fail, even if all men were willing to submit to it. Pile entitlement upon entitlement for women, heap punishment after punishment onto men: It cannot work, because women’s wishes will always outpace legislation and lead to new demands.

But while the revolution has not achieved its aims, it has certainly achieved something. It has destroyed monogamy and family stability. It has resulted in a polygamous mating pattern of immodest women aggressively pursuing a small number of men. It has decreased the number of children born, and insured that many who are born grow up without a father in their lives. And, least often mentioned, it has made it impossible for many decent men to find wives.

One occasionally hears of studies purporting to show that men are happier with their “sex lives” than women. It has always struck me as ludicrous that anyone would take such survey results at face value. First, women complain more about everything than men. But second, many men (especially young men) experience a powerful mauvaise honte when they are unsuccessful with women. They rarely compare notes with other men, and still more rarely do so honestly. Everyone puts up a brave front, however lonely he may actually be. Hence, men almost always imagine other men to have greater success with women than is actually the case. This situation has worsened since the 1960s, with the propagation of the illusion that there is “more sex” available to men than formerly.

But if women are only mating with a few exceptionally attractive men, and if many women fail to mate at all, there must be a large number of men unable to get a woman. We might, in the spirit of William Gilmore Simms, term them the forgotten men of the sexual revolution. I have reason to believe that a growing number are willing to come out of the closet (to use a currently popular expression) and admit that, whoever has been doing all the “hooking up” one reads about, it hasn’t been them. Simple prudence dictates that we give some consideration to the situation of these men. In societies where polygamy is openly practiced (e.g., in Africa and the Muslim world), young bachelors tend to form gangs which engage in antisocial behavior: “It is not good for man to be alone.”

Posted in Alt Right, F. Roger Devlin | Comments Off on Sexual Utopia In Power