NYT: Is It Safe to Be Jewish in New York?

By Ginia Bellafante:

But, in fact, anti-Semitism was already quietly on the rise. For several years now, expressions of anti-Jewish sentiment have made up the preponderance of hate crime complaints in the city.

Contrary to what are surely the prevailing assumptions, anti-Semitic incidents have constituted half of all hate crimes in New York this year, according to the Police Department. To put that figure in context, there have been four times as many crimes motivated by bias against Jews — 142 in all — as there have against blacks. Hate crimes against Jews have outnumbered hate crimes targeted at transgender people by a factor of 20…

If anti-Semitism bypasses consideration as a serious problem in New York, it is to some extent because it refuses to conform to an easy narrative with a single ideological enemy. During the past 22 months, not one person caught or identified as the aggressor in an anti-Semitic hate crime has been associated with a far right-wing group, Mark Molinari, commanding officer of the police department’s Hate Crimes Task Force, told me…

A related issue is that bias stemming from longstanding ethnic tensions in the city presents complexities that many liberals have chosen simply to ignore. “When we were growing up in Harlem our demoralizing series of landlords were Jewish, and we hated them.” So begins an essay by James Baldwin that appeared in The New York Times in 1967 titled “Negroes Are Anti-Semitic Because They’re Anti-White.”

When a Hasidic man or woman is attacked by anyone in New York City, mainstream progressive advocacy groups do not typically send out emails calling for concern and fellowship and candlelight vigils in Union Square, as they often do when individuals are harmed in New York because of their race or ethnicity or how they identify in terms of gender or sexual orientation.

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Why would Trump supporters be violent (outside of lying press fantasies)? We have the White House. We have our good faith shot at accomplishing our goals without violence. Maybe it’ll work, maybe it won’t, but we got our chance. On the other hand, leftist violence makes a kind of sense, because they feel desperate and excluded, and they don’t think in terms of being given a chance.

* Norman Podhoretz wrote a famous essay in the early sixties about how, as a kid in the thirties, he was most scared of the Negroes. Every Jew in New York knows that they need to be careful around blacks and don’t have to worry about whites. The non-Orthodox will of course never admit this aloud in a million years, but the Orthodox are fairly open about it.

* Jews are genuinely a delight to live around. Jewish neighborhoods are almost always the nicest in town. Jewish schools are usually where people want to send their kids. Jewish-run companies tend to pay the best and have the best working environments. Americans would all love to live in Bel Air, attend Princeton, and work at Google.

Most run-in-the-mill racism typically comes from noticing a little too much. But anyone with common sense, an ounce of rationality, and the ability to notice can clearly see that Jews make much better neighbors than any random American. That’s typically why you see the racist elements of the electorate, like white Southern Republicans, veer heavily towards philo-semitism.

The only way to really be anti-semitic in 2018 is if you have the ability to rationalize convoluted, counter-intuitive, grand conspiracy theories about centuries long plots and bad juju. (Ironically this is not altogether that different than traditional Talmudic reasoning, so many of the higher-profile modern day anti-semites, like our site’s publisher, are actually themselves Jewish.) Naturally not only does this attract a lot of schizophrenics, who are most comfortable indulging in paranoid fantasies. It also frequently pushes those on the edge of mental illness over the edge of sanity. Much the same as the SJW obsession with micro-aggression and intersectionality does for the hard left.

* What keeps anti-Semitism alive is two things:
1) A small minority of left-wing, politically active Jewish intellectuals have made a decades-long hobby of undermining the cultural fabric of the US, primarily through media and academia.
2) The vast majority of Jews, who do not fall into group 1, nonetheless refuse to call out their co-ethnics for their bad behavior, or outright deny it. For good or bad, this shapes the perception of the group as a whole.

As you note, by most socioeconomic metrics, the Jewish people are equal to or better to the random Gentile. But where they fail miserably is the ability to chastise their own, more so if the offender has had some financial success. Asking a typical US Jewish person to speak candidly about say, George Soros, is about as fruitful as asking Linda Sarsour to speak candidly about the burqa.

* https://advocate.nyc.gov/landlord-watchlist/worst-landlords

To be fair, you can’t tell if the Jewish landlords are overrepresented on this list. Most landlords in NYC are Jewish. But it does breed resentment.

One of the landlords, Mark Tress, is identified as having arranged an initiative in Lakewood, NJ, to assist Orthodox Medicaid fraudsters by giving them no interest, on your honor loans to pay back after they entered a ridiculous amnesty plan to repay benefits they stole.

Tress is quoted talking about how we need to take care of the community. He has insisted that the NYC worst landlords list is inaccurate and even sued to correct it. The strategy in Lakewood has been to buy houses, pack them with as many illegals as you can, let them go to shit and get condemned, get federal money to build new low income housing, and fill it with “poor” Jewish students and their families.

The Orthodox have been stealing benefits for years and the state finally charged a few of them, but then backtracked and offered amnesty if they repaid in full. They secretly decided to accept less, and mayhem as ensued as it has been revealed.

Here is an interesting look into how some of them were stealing benefits, including having dozens of bank accounts, using a check cashing / beeper store to launder money.

James Baldwin writes in 1967:

When we were growing up in Harlem our demoralizing series of landlords were Jewish, and we hated them. We hated them because they were terrible landlords, and did not take care of the building. A coat of paint, a broken window, a stopped sink, a stopped toilet, a sagging floor, a broken ceiling, a dangerous stairwell, the question of garbage disposal, the question of heat and cold, of roaches and rats–all questions of life and death for the poor, and especially for those with children–we had to cope with all of these as best we could. Our parents were lashed to futureless jobs, in order to pay the outrageous rent. We knew that the landlord treated us this way only because we were colored, and he knew that we could not move out.

The grocer was a Jew, and being in debt to him was very much like being in debt to the company store. The butcher was a Jew and, yes, we certainly paid more for bad cuts of meat than other New York citizens, and we very often carried insults home, along with the meat. We bought our clothes from a Jew and, sometimes, our secondhand shoes, and the pawnbroker was a Jew–perhaps we hated him most of all. The merchants along 125th Street were Jewish–at least many of them were; I don’t know if Grant’s or Woolworth’s are Jewish names–and I well remember that it was only after the Harlem riot of 1935 that Negroes were allowed to earn a little money in some of the stores where they spent so much.

Not all of these white people were cruel–on the contrary, I remember some who were certainly as thoughtful as the bleak circumstances allowed–but all of them were exploiting us, and that was why we hated them.

But we also hated the welfare workers, of whom some were white, some colored, some Jewish, and some not. We hated the policemen, not all of whom were Jewish, and some of whom were black. The poor, of whatever color, do not trust the law and certainly have no reason so, and God knows we didn’t. “If you must call a cop,” we said in those days, “for God’s sake, make sure it’s a white one.” We did not feel that the cops were protecting us, for we knew too much about the reasons for the kinds of crimes committed in the ghetto; but we feared black cops even more than white cops, because the black cop had to work so much harder–on your head–to prove to himself and his colleagues that he was not like all the other niggers.

We hated many of our teacher at school because they so clearly despised us and treated us like dirty, ignorant savages. Not all of these teachers were Jewish. Some of them, alas, were black. I used to carry my father’s union dues downtown for him sometimes. I hated everyone in that den of thieves, especially the man who took the envelope from me, the envelope which contained my father’s hard-earned money, that envelope which contained bread for his children. “Thieves,” I thought, “every one of you!” And I know I was right about that, and I have not changed my mind. But whether or not all these people were Jewish, I really do not know.

The Army may or may not be controlled by Jews; I don’t know and I don’t care. I know that when I worked for the Army I hated all my bosses because of the way they treated me. I don’t know if the post office is Jewish but I would certainly dread working for it again. I don’t know if Wanamaker’s was Jewish, but I didn’t like running their elevator and I didn’t like any of their customers. I don’t know if Nabisco is Jewish, but I didn’t like clearing their basement. I don’t know if Riker’s is Jewish, but I didn’t like scrubbing their floors. I don’t know if the big, white bruiser who thought it was fun to call me “Shine” was Jewish, but I know I tried to kill him–and he stopped calling me “Shine.” I don’t know if the last taxi driver who refused to stop for me was Jewish, but I know I hoped he’d break his neck before he got home. And I don’t think that General Electric or General Motors or R.C.A. or Con Edison or Mobil Oil or Coca Cola or Pepsi-Cola or Firestone or the Board of Education or the textbook industry or Hollywood or Broadway or television–or Wall Street, Sacramento, Dallas, Atlanta, Albany or Washington–are controlled by Jews. I think they are controlled by Americans, and the American Negro situation is a direct result of this control. And anti-Semitism among Negroes, inevitable as it may be, and understandable, alas, as it is, does not operate to menace this control, but only to confirm it. It is not the Jew who controls the American drama. It is the Christian.

The root of anti-Semitism among Negroes is, ironically, the relationship of colored peoples–all over the globe–to the Christian world. This is a fact which may be difficult to grasp, not only for the ghetto’s most blasted and embittered inhabitants, but also for many Jews, to say nothing of many Christians. But it is a fact, and it will not ameliorated–in fact, it can only be aggravated–by the adoption, on the part of colored people now, of the most devastating of the Christian vices.

Of course, it is true, and I am not so naÔve as not to know it, that many Jews despise Negroes, even as their Aryan brothers do. (There are also Jews who despise Jews, even as their Aryan brothers do.) It is true that many Jews use, shamelessly, the slaughter of the 6,000,000 by the Third Reich as proof that they cannot be bigots–or in the hope of not being held responsible for their bigotry. It is galling to be told by a Jew whom you know to be exploiting you that he cannot possibly be doing what you know he is doing because he is a Jew. It is bitter to watch the Jewish storekeeper locking up his store for the night, and going home. Going, with your money in his pocket, to a clean neighborhood, miles from you, which you will not be allowed to enter. Nor can it help the relationship between most Negroes and most Jews when part of this money is donated to civil rights. In the light of what is now known as the white backlash, this money can be looked on as conscience money merely, as money given to keep the Negro happy in his place, and out of white neighborhoods.

One does not wish, in short, to be told by an American Jew that his suffering is as great as the American Negro’s suffering. It isn’t, and one knows that it isn’t from the very tone in which he assures you that it is.

For one thing, the American Jew’s endeavor, whatever it is, has managed to purchase a relative safety for his children, and a relative future for them. This is more than your father’s endeavor was able to do for you, and more than your endeavor has been able to do for your children. There are days when it can be exceedingly trying to deal with certain white musical or theatrical celebrities who may or may not be Jewish–what, in show business, is a name?–but whose preposterous incomes cause one to think bitterly of the fates of such people as Beside Smith or King Oliver or Ethel Waters. Furthermore, the Jew can be proud of his suffering, or at least not ashamed of it. His history and his suffering do not begin in America, where black men have been taught to be ashamed of everything, especially their suffering.

The Jew’s suffering is recognized as part of the moral history of the world and the Jew is recognized as a contributor so the world’s history: this is not true for the blacks. Jewish history, whether or not one can say it is honored, is certainly known: the black history has been blasted, maligned and despised. The Jew is a white man, and when white men rise up against oppression, they are heroes: when black men rise, they have reverted to their native savagery. The uprising in the Warsaw ghetto was not described as a riot, nor were the participants maligned as hoodlums: the boys and girls in Watts and Harlem are thoroughly aware of this, and it certainly contributes to their attitude toward the Jews.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Blacks, New York | Comments Off on NYT: Is It Safe to Be Jewish in New York?

Election Predictions

A friend says: First the disclaimer. It is very difficult to make predictions about races in states and districts outside my local ones. I have to rely on polls and trends from polls and articles written. The polls are only as accurate as the persons polled actually mimic the electorate that shows up to vote on election day. Many polls have built in biases based on the samples they take. Articles are very difficult to use to provide information. The authors all have their biases and you have to be very careful in selecting the drops of accuracy from the sea of opinion.

That being said, there are a few things to watch for early.

Trump has staked a lot on campaigning in Florida. It is his second home and Mar A Lago is the retreat from the White House he goes to most frequently. The polls there show the race as extremely tight both for Senate and Governor. The Republican candidate for Governor has embraced Trumpism but has consistently polled behind Gillum. Whether this is due to the changing demographics of Florida (it had a large influx of Puerto Ricans after the hurricane although it is not clear how many claim residency and have registered to vote) or hostility to Trump or dislike of DeSantis is not clear. Gillum, is facing corruption charges which would ordinarily be enough to sink him so to me it looks like a good portion of the Florida electorate wants to stick it to Trump. There is also the possible Bradley effect in which an African American candidate polls somewhat higher because the persons asked the questions don’t want to appear to be racist, yet when in the privacy of the voting booth will not vote for a black governor. This race will be extremely close, closer than the polls as of today show. I would not be surprised to see whichever candidate win defeat the loser by less than half a percentage point. I think that Gillum will defeat DeSantis Also on the Florida ballot is the Senate race in which the incumbent Governor, Rick Scott, who is relatively popular, trails the incumbent Senator Bill Nelson. This could go either way but, if I had to bet, my money is on Nelson. Florida also has a ballot proposition which looks like it will pass restoring voting rights to convicted felons once their sentence and probation is completed. The conventional wisdom is this effects something close a million and a half persons in Florida and that once the voting rights are restored they will vote mostly for Democrats. If this happens it changes the way the 2020 campaign will be run because Florida has so many electoral votes. Florida is tied with New York for the third richest electoral haul, 29, which will go up after the 2020 census.

Georgia is the other state to watch the governor’s race in. Stacy Abrams the black democrat slightly trails Kemp the republican. Both Oprah Winfrey and Obama either have campaigned for her or will campaign for her before election day. Although she may have had a shot, by stating she would ban the AR-15 and refusing to answer whether she would confiscate them, she has just done more to excite anti Abrams vote than any Republican has ever done. Regardless of whether most Americans support gun control, in almost every election where gun control becomes an issue on the ballot either by initiative or the position of someone running for office, the persons who oppose gun control usually win the day. The dream of democrats of a social justice oriented African American democrat as governor in Georgia will not be realized this year. Also if Abrams pulls it out, this will embolden congressional democrats to seek to pass gun control legislation. If she loses, don’t expect it to come up in the next two years.

In terms of surprises, I don’t think that Beto O’Rourke will knock off Ted Cruz, but even though the polling shows Cruz with a seven point lead I would expect his margin of victory to be substantially smaller, more in the 2 to 3 percentage point range.

I do expect Braun to upset Donnelly in Indiana (although the attempts by the Republicans to paint Donnelly as a racist because of the way he praised his minority staff members not only is stupid but appears to have backfired) but wouldn’t be surprised if Donnelly does get reelected. Same with Debbie Stabenow in Michigan who the Republicans like to claim is in trouble against John James. They are blowing smoke. Stabenow will win by more than 10 points. In Missouri look for Claire McCaskill to be defeated. The Republicans learned their lesson and have not selected a right wing nut to run against her, although he is plenty conservative. McCaskill may make it close but I think Josh Hawley will win and if I had to put money on it, win easily.

The Arizona Senate race is the most interesting. It is hard for me to shake the idea that Arizona is actually an ultra conservative state. It turns out that Phoenix is now the fifth largest city in the United States and in general urban populations are more liberal than rural ones. In 2016 Trump won the state by less than 100,000 votes although no doubt his margin was cut because Gary Johnson the libertarian candidate who had been governor of neighboring New Mexico garnered 106,000 votes. Sinema has a history before entering congress of radical leftist politics although as a congresswoman has been a liberal but not extremely liberal vote. McSally is a combat veteran, but is having problems because she ran in the primary against Kelly Ward and Joe Arpaio. The scars from the primary still linger and have led a not insubstantial number of Republicans to indicate in polls they support Sinema. Of interest is that Sinema was married, but is now the only openly bisexual member of congress. I think that when push comes to shove, the Republicans who do hold a numerical registration advantage over the Democrats will come back to McSally and she will win in a very close race.

Overall I think the Republicans will hold the Senate I don’t think they will pick up seats. I think they will end up with 51 seats, with a slight possibility of gaining up to two more, but I would bet against that. They may even end up with 50 seats and have to rely on Pence for his tie breaking votes when it comes to confirmation of appointed officials and judges.

I can’t even begin to give opinions about house races. I know the generic polls favor the democrats and historically the party out of power gets significant gains in the mid term elections. Those bode well for the Democrats. Of course, Trump does not hold the undivided loyalty of Republicans. He still faces never Trumpers, recalcitrant elected officials etc. One thing pointed out by Republicans is that the opposition to Trump, the resistance is very strong, in fact overwhelmingly strong, but only in districts that are already Democratic. What does it matter if a Democrat wins with 51% or 99% of the vote. What matters is how the numbers play in swing districts. Typically the Democratic advantage overall in polling on a generic basis has to be in the range of 6 to 10% in order to wrest majority control in the house. The Democrats appear to be on the cusp. My prediction is that the Democrats will gain a majority of seats in the house of representatives. I don’t think it will be a wipeout of Republicans, but I think it will be more than a one or two member advantage. When the dust settles, I would expect the Democrats to have something in the nature of a five to ten vote majority. As everyone knows, its not like a Democratic House will actually enact anything. It can only enact legislation if the Republican Senate joins in and President Trump doesn’t veto it.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Election Predictions

Three Months Inside Alt-Right New York

Jay Firestone writes:

Max and I introduced ourselves as working-class Trump supporters. After five minutes of macho man talk about fistfights, truck driving, and laying heavy pipes, they were sold. I mentioned my connection to the Book Club, and in order not to disrupt my cover story, identified myself as a neo-Nazi to every Proud Boy I met. That’s fine, they all told me. Gavin has a strict policy: no Nazi imagery or language is allowed in public, and especially when you talk to the press. There’s a pinned message in their private Facebook group stating this policy, they told me. Otherwise, you can believe and say whatever you want among other Proud Boys…

I mentioned I’m a fan of the Shoah, and Sal excitedly showed me his text messages with its host, TRS founder Mike “Enoch” Peinovich. “Mike and I text all the time” Sal beamed proudly, showing me dozens of messages as evidence. Sal claimed Peinovich and the rest of the TRS “pool party,” their euphemism for meetup groups, were on the way. They never showed.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on Three Months Inside Alt-Right New York

Free Lunch At The Saudi Embassy

I hear the Saudi embassy on Sawtelle Blvd is offering a free catered kosher lunch today to rehabilitate their image. I admit I’m tempted. Still, not sure it is wise even though I left journalism a long time ago.

From the Yelp reviews:

* The smell of blood and bleach all over the place, could hear a journalist screaming in the background. Wouldn’t recommend.

* I was asked to take a seat and wait for my papers. Within moments the door shut behind me and several men attempted to slice my arm off with a bone saw. They had the audacity to have headphones in their ears, probably listening to Brahms. Luckily I managed to stun one of them and flee, but not before one of the men stole my jacket. Beware.

Posted in Saudis | Comments Off on Free Lunch At The Saudi Embassy

#100 10-31-18 Did Silicon Valley Buy Conservatism Inc?

00:00 The collapse of National Review after John O’Sullivan (1998) and Commentary magazine after Norman Podhoretz
18:00 David French says Steve King must be defeated
25:00 GOP scheme to pay women to falsely accuse Robert Mueller of sexual misconduct
38:00 Trump seems to be growing stronger in office, having a ball
40:00 Revisiting Roe v Wade ruling on abortion
55:00 Whitey Bulger’s murder and the problem of when the inmates run the asylum
1:00:00 We Were Made for Civil War
1:04:00 Vancouver: The City That Had Too Much Money
1:15:00 NYT: Lil Peep Died Before Becoming Pop Royalty. His New Music May Change That.
1:20:00 The Trip (2010) analysis

* Z-Man writes:

In a series of tweets yesterday, someone calling herself Emerald Robinson announced she had evidence that at least one “conservative” magazine was taking payola from a tech giant. The implication was that the magazine was taking money in exchange for countering the stories about the tech oligarchs censoring dissidents.The woman works for an outfit called One America News, which is a small operation that has made a name for itself during the Trump phenomenon…

The most likely candidate, before examining the hints in the tweet, is National Review, which lost its moral compass when Rich Lowry took over the operation. It’s also the one conservative publication with any influence, at least before it hurled itself onto the NeverTrump bonfire three years ago. If you are going to bribe a conservative publication, you may as well bribe the biggest one. It’s not like any of these operations are making so much money that they would say not to a bribe. It’s their reason to exist.

Of course, the clue about the subscriber base evaporating adds to the speculation that the culprit is National Review. When you look at the tax filings for the 501(c)(3) they use to launder contributions, it appears their donations shriveled up during the campaign. Their ugly smear campaign against Trump and his voters turns out to have been a costly blunder. That is if the tax filings tell the whole story. It is possible that the tech giant or some other wealthy patron is paying writers directly or using another vehicle.

I speculated during the campaign that Dan and Farris Wilks were buying support for Ted Cruz and funding the NeverTrump lunacy among so-called conservatives. The two are members in good standing of the donor class and the guys bankrolling people like Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager and Glenn Beck. My suspicion was they were spreading cash around on the side to the various pens for hire at operations like National Review and the Federalist. It would explain some rather obvious patterns we saw in the campaign.

Now, in fairness to National Review, we don’t know if the person tweeting this stuff is legitimate or correct. Her name suggests she should be swinging from a pole, rather than covering the White House, but these days, the differences between the two professions are microscopic. In fact, it would be a relief to learn that the mass media is simply singing for their supper, delivering what a handful of billionaires demand. Otherwise, it suggests a systemic failure that can only be addressed by madame guillotine.

* Fetal homicide ruling mandates ‘Roe exception’ challenge, Alabama justice says

* Theater Thursday: The Trip (2010)

* Is America headed for civil war?

* NYT: “A new study shows that the structure of the human pelvis varies between populations [races], which could have implications for how babies are birthed.”

* “Strange thing, culture,” remarked senior nurse to junior—a rookie—as they cleaned up afterwards. “Whites curse and blacks holler. Hispanics I’ve known to actually sing. But the Chinese—not a whisper.” [Fire from the Sun, Ch. 71]

* A young man is far more interested in what he can put into a young lady’s pelvis than what he can take out of it.

* When something is going in, Asians tend to squeak in a higher pitch. Whites and blacks get louder and lower in tone.

* Not just women. A White or Black baby on a long flight – guaranteed screeching. Dozens of Asian babies on a 16-hour flight – nary a peep. I was absolutely amazed. Perhaps they were saving their screeching for the NYT pages some 20-odd years later.

* Could they please publish a comprehensive list of the biological racial differences it is racist to know about as well as a list of the biological racial differences it is racist NOT to know about? Let’s also get daily update emails when a thing moves from one list to the other.

It’s tough when you get called a racist who doesn’t care about the deaths of black babies for not knowing that black women have big butts… ahem… deep pelvises. Even the original Becky from Baby Got Back is more woke than you on the PQ.

Maybe some of you keep up with all this, but there are some unclear points. For example, I’m pretty sure it’s okay to know about bone density differences since this shows that black people are tougher than white people. We already covered pelvis shapes… so you may think you’re in the clear with the skeletal system but… is it okay to know about skull circumference differences also? How about if you know about skull circumference but make very sure not to know about IQ correlation?

But skull shape might be relevant to birth and that means healthcare outcome disparities… so you might also be a racist white person who murders black babies on purpose if you DON’T know it. Maybe you can know it if you’re currently delivering a baby but not at other times?

It’s bad to say blacks are biologically better at running when you’re talking about football or sprinting but good to say they are better at running when it’s DISTANCE running. I think. If you relate this to the pelvic differences that are racist not to know, does that then make it okay?

Also not sure about the status of innate black rhythmic ability. It’s been scientifically shown and it suggests a positive ability that could make blacks superior to whites, so that’s good, but it could also suggest that you believe in stereotypes about black people singing and dancing, which is bad, unless it’s a black comedian / writer for the root making fun of white people dancing, which is also good.

I’ve been getting screened for sickle cell to show how much I don’t believe in race but I find I’m getting dirty looks from people with deep pelvises.

It’s getting hard out here for an NPC.

* Tucker Carlson’s Ship of Fools

* NYT lionizes guy you’ve never heard of: NYT: Lil Peep Died Before Becoming Pop Royalty. His New Music May Change That.

* Who is Jacob Wohl & why is he saying mean things about Robert Mueller? What we know about the shady ‘intel agency’ behind an alleged GOP scheme to pay women to falsely accuse Mueller of sexual misconduct

* Whitey Bulger murdered in “maximum-security” prison.

* Vancouver: The City That Had Too Much Money

* Is your Halloween costume racist? More

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on #100 10-31-18 Did Silicon Valley Buy Conservatism Inc?

Big Jews Vs Little Jews

Joe* says: “As a white person, I’ve found your message on big jews vs little jews to be an open and honest rebuttal of leftwing jews. For the first time in a long time, it makes me believe our people can work together…”

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Big Jews Vs Little Jews

White Genocide Is Real

00:00 Any validity to the white genocide meme?
27:00 Liberal Jews are playing with fire with their anti-Gentile bigotry
34:00 Elite rabbis lining up against hate speech, seeking speech censorship
38:00 Russian Jews are rarely liberal
45:00 Hot Russian women and their downsides, Spectator article
48:00 Trump targets birthright citizenship
1:02:00 Lauren McCluskey Timeline: Melvin Rowland Extorted Student. Lauren McCluskey didn’t want to be a bad Becky, and she ended up dead.
1:18:00 At a Berlin security conference, hardline neocon Jamie Fly appeared to claim some credit for the recent coordinated purge of alternative media.
1:25:00 Roosh on HIAS: “Just because this Jewish charity has 10 people making over $140,000 a year to “rescue” third world souls into the United States doesn’t mean they wouldn’t do it for free. You simply don’t understand how much heart it takes to do charity work that improves the world!”
1:29:00 Rabbi Ruti Regan: “Hey, Jewish communities participating in #ShowUpForShabbat? Please keep in mind that Jews of color are Jews. Please don’t assume that unfamiliar people of color who come to synagogue this week aren’t Jewish. Jews seeking community in the wake of tragedy shouldn’t face racism too.”
1:32:00 Rabbi Ruti Regan is a feminist rabbi, liturgist, and a disabled disability advocate.
1:49:00 Jewish assimilation
1:55:00 Bernard Henry Levi’s feud with Michel Houellebecq
2:02:00 Lester Holt Dressed up as a Woman in ‘Whiteface,’ Fallon In Blackface, What Exactly is NBC’s Policy?
2:14:00 IS THIS WORSE THAN 1968? No says Pat Buchanan.
2:28:00 Are men in prison more likely to be gay? Kinsey was duped.
2:30:00 The rent boy suspected of a murderous vendetta – “Andrew Phillip Cunanan, the 27-year-old Californian now being hunted for Gianni Versace’s murder”
2:33:00 White nationalist writer says he’s a canvasser for Brian Kemp
2:35:00 The incredibly shoddy plot to smear Robert Mueller, explained: https://www.vox.com/2018/10/30/18044110/robert-mueller-jacob-wohl-jack-burkman-surefire

“During a recent protest at the United Methodist General Conference, LGBTQ activist Reverend Will Green sings the hymn “Blest Be The Ties That Bind” with his arms and feet bound behind his back.”

* Steve Sailer: NYT: “We Can Replace Them”

* Z-Man writes:

On more than a few occasions, I have made the point that the greatest threat to Jews in America is other Jews. While there no doubt exist plenty of anti-Semites, counter-Semites and bigots, they are powerless to act on their opinions. Sure, one can go bonkers and shoot up a synagogue, but that guy could just as easily have thought his dog told him to shoot the Pope. In a big open country, you will have a nut of every variety and on occasion, one will slip the leash and cause mayhem. There’s no remedy for it.

As far as a serious threat to Jews, there never has been one in America, because the culture of the country has never been hospital to confrontational tribalism among white people. Instead, it is a frontier culture, where tribes just avoid one another if they cannot get along. Talk to a European about moving around and they will marvel at the casual way in which Americans just pick up and leave if they think the next town is better. The result of this is our anti-Semites tend to be separatists, not confrontational.

That’s a good thing, but it is not an immutable thing. As the country becomes majority-minority, whites are slowly starting to think of their racial identity as their primary identity and their primary interest. In one of life’s ironies, the Progressive demands for tribalism are creating a white tribe, organized to defend white people from the predation of the Left. It may simply be an inevitable result of demographics, but white Americans are slowly coming to terms with the reality facing them. As a result, that frontier mentality is waning.

This will be a different world for Jews, who have enjoyed a casual indifference from the white majority, since Jews migrated here in bulk at the start of the last century.

* Not a word in here about how absorbing the world’s refuse is good for America.

* White nationalist writer says he’s a canvasser for Brian Kemp

* Op-Ed: Changing an Institution from Within; My Experience as a Gay Methodist Pastor

* Pat Buchanan: IS THIS WORSE THAN 1968?

* Lester Holt Dressed up as a Woman in ‘Whiteface,’ Fallon In Blackface, What Exactly is NBC’s Policy?

* Trump targeting birthright citizenship with executive order

* Facebook Censorship of Alternative Media “Just the Beginning,” Says Top Neocon Insider

* Lauren McCluskey Timeline: Melvin Rowland Extorted Student

Rodney Martin writes:

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside” Section 1, Clause 1 of the 14th Amendment

This was a 1-time deal to grant citizenship to “Freed Slaves” in the Post Civil War Era, Keep in mind the 14th EXCLUDED Indians/Native Americans, they did not become U.S. Citizens until 1924. It was also in hopes of breaking up the Democratic monopoly in the South, i.e. Freed Slaves would vote Republican, which they did, until the disputed 1876 Presidential Election which resulted in the withdrawal of Federal Troops by President Hayes which then resulted in Jim Crow Laws.

The 2nd part of the 14th under the “Plain Language Legal Doctrine , i.e. “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside” clearly establishes that the person in question must pass a 2-Part Determination 1- Be subject to the Jurisdiction an Illegal can be subject to the Jurisdiction AND 2- be a RESIDENT of the State where they reside, i.e. they MUST be a LEGAL Resident. An Illegal cannot meet the 2nd part- Residency, which is why Blue States are trying like hell to EXPAND the definition of State Citizenship.

Keep in mind Congress passed a Statute that codified the broad interpretation of the 14th i.e. all anyone has to do is drop a kid & go back to China, Somalia, or India the next day.
Congress & the Left says the “birth” establishes “Jurisdiction”, but they fail to address “Residency” requirement.

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on White Genocide Is Real

CNN: Pittsburgh synagogue shooting is believed to be the deadliest attack on Jews in American history

Was this slaughter prompted by disrespectful speech? Jews have about the most violent speech around and yet they have about the lowest rates of criminal violence. The Jewish Bible contains God’s commands to commit genocide. Is that hate speech? If not, why not?

From CNN:

In a statement condemning the Pittsburgh attack, the Rabbinical Assembly said the shooting was a reminder that anti-Semitism “is on the rise in America at a rate unprecedented in decades.”

“This vicious hate crime, perpetrated against innocent people at prayer is but the latest in an escalating scourge of hate-based violence in America,” it said.

Moishe Bane, president of the Orthodox Union, expressed heartbreak for “the senseless murder of our fellow Jews and all victims of vicious hate crimes.”

“We condemn the dangerous rhetoric that foments such senseless violence and we stand with the Tree of Life Congregation and the whole Pittsburgh community at this terrible time,” he said.

Rabbi Elazar Muskin, president of the Rabbinical Council of America said “fringe elements of society” had become “emboldened by speech which is often disrespectful and hateful.”

I wonder if R. Muskin ever read the Torah and the Talmud and did he ever find that speech disrespectful and hateful? If not, why not? There’s no definition of hate speech that would not include Torah and siddur (Jewish prayer book).

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on CNN: Pittsburgh synagogue shooting is believed to be the deadliest attack on Jews in American history

Will a major news organization do a story on rabbis Avrohom Union of the RCC and R. Moshe Hafutah of 90035

I wonder how this will affect those people who rely on these rabbis’ Batei Din (Jewish law courts) for conversion and kosher certification?

According to Rabbis.org:

Mar 20, 2014 — Rabbi Avrohom Union is the Dayan and Menahel of the Beth Din of the Rabbinical Council of California. He grew up in North Miami Beach, Florida, and attended the Hebrew Academy in Miami Beach. Upon graduation, he went to the Mesivta of Greater Miami and then to Telshe Yeshiva of Chicago. This was followed by eight years in Bais Hatalmud in Jerusalem, four of them in Kollel.

He received his semicha from the Israeli Rabbinate and later received the dayanut qualification of Yadin Yadin from HaGaon Rav Dov Schwartzman. He did undergraduate studies at the University of South Africa and completed his Masters in Psychology at Pepperdine University in Los Angeles. Rabbi Union felt that a degree in psychology would provide him with additional expertise and insight in his pastoral and community work.

Rabbi Union was rabbi of the Constantia Hebrew Congregation in Cape Town, South Africa, where he also served as a Dayan for the Cape Beis Bin. In the United States, he was the Rabbi of Young Israel of Beverly Hills. He has given many adult education classes for various organizations over the years, and currently serves on the faculty of the Jewish Learning Exchange as well as Ohel Sara Seminary for Women.
Helping people and helping them live Jewishly is Rabbi Union’s favorite aspect of being a rabbi. He takes pride in raising a family of committed members of Klal Yisrael, promoting unity in the local orthodox Rabbinate, and building a Vaad as a platform for serving the community.

Prior to his first Yom Kippur in Cape Town, he met with the board to review the service and the local customs. He asked them why they blow the shofar after Maariv instead of after Neila, contrary to the established minhag. They told him that as soon as the shofar is blown everybody will run for the doors. “Let’s see” he replied. That Yom Kippur, he turned to his congregants as Neila ended and told them what the board said. “They think you are going to run. They think you will have had enough. But I think that after such an uplifting and meaningful Yom Kippur, you will want to do the right thing and remain for Maariv after the shofar. I believe in you”. With that he gave the signal to blow the shofar, the doors remained as they were, and his president chuckled that the Rabbi had won this round.

His advice to younger rabbis who are at the start of their rabbinic career is; treat your congregants with dignity and genuine ahavas yisrael and they will respect you even if you are demanding.

Rabbi Union served as the English editor of Mashiv B’halacha, a publication of the Mechon L’Horaah and has published numerous pieces in the Shaarei Tzedek journal of Choshen Mishpat case law. He is involved with Nefesh, the organization of Orthodox mental health professionals, and he also works with his wife Tova, in training kallah teachers. He currently sits on the Halachic Advisory Board of Magen Yeladim International Child Safety Institute.

Rabbi Union is married to Tova (nee Reis) who is the Girls’ Middle School Coordinator for Emek Hebrew Academy. They have 9 beautiful children and seventeen grandchildren.

If you get to have any kind of conversation with Rabbi Union, he’ll be sure to let you know he has a masters degree in Psychology. He’s the greatest rabbinic street fighter on the West Coast. His handshake is soft but his will is steel.

Here is some background on R. Moshe Hafuta. He has a sister married to Kabbalist Rabbi Yoshiyahu Pinto.

From the Jewish Journal Apr. 3, 2013:

After Doheny Kosher scandal, what does the future hold for L.A.’s meat market?

On Thursday, March 7, at 6:10 a.m., a van and an SUV sit in adjacent parking spaces, in the lot of a McDonald’s near the junction of the 101 and the 405 freeways, their rear lift-gates open.

Mike Engelman, the driver of the SUV, with the help of the driver of the van, loads something into the back of the SUV. Then Engelman, who owns Doheny Glatt Kosher Meat Market, one of Los Angeles’ largest distributors of kosher animal products, drives off, headed to Pico-Robertson to open his shop.

Almost exactly one hour later, in the parking lot behind Doheny Meats, the mashgiach (rabbinic overseer) from the Rabbinical Council of California (RCC), who had unlocked the doors to the store and the distribution center just 10 minutes earlier, is nowhere in sight. Engelman signals to an employee to unload the SUV. The employee takes out eight boxes, hundreds of pounds of unidentified meat or poultry, and wheels them into the store through its rear door.

This entire sequence was captured on video by a private investigator, and on Sunday afternoon, March 24, Rabbi Meyer H. May, president of the RCC, watched the video in horror. What he saw wasn’t just Engelman undermining the supervision of his agency; he also saw the rabbinic supervisor, who is never supposed to leave the premises, break with RCC protocol.

All this was revealed on March 24, the day before Passover. At sundown the following day, hundreds of local families at their own seder tables, as well as thousands of customers at resorts across the region, would be sitting down to eat their traditional Passover meals featuring meat and poultry that had passed through Doheny’s doors.

May and his rabbinic colleagues at the RCC revoked Doheny’s certification. They also declared at the same time that all meat sold by Doheny Meats up until 3 p.m. that day could still be considered kosher.

The aftermath of this scandal is still playing out, but it has already rocked Los Angeles’ kosher industry in a way that hasn’t happened since 1990, when the Rabbinical Council of California (RCC) removed its certification from Emes Kosher Meat Products after a rabbinic supervisor found an empty box in the store’s dumpster that had come from a non-kosher poultry supplier.

This time the scandal implicates both Doheny Meats, believed to be among the largest distributors of kosher animal products on the West Coast, and the RCC, a prominent and widely trusted kosher certifier. As a result, the scandal could have far-reaching consequences.

If Engelman intentionally circumvented his mashgiach, as the videos appear to indicate, Engelman’s business, which he has owned for 28 years, will likely never regain the RCC’s imprimatur, let alone the trust of kosher consumers, and could be forced to close. The case is also a black eye for the RCC, in part because its protocols appear to have been breached on multiple occasions, and also because the breach was not discovered by the rabbis themselves, but by a private investigator who says he was working independently.

Further complicating the matter, the RCC also had received tips about suspicious practices at Doheny years before this scandal broke — the agency says its own investigations turned up no evidence of wrongdoing — a fact that leaves many local observant Jews questioning whether the RCC is up to the task of supervising the approximately 100 kosher restaurants, markets and caterers that bear its hechsher (seal of approval) across the city.

From Haaretz, Jan. 25, 2017:

Rabbi Pinto Released After Serving Jail Time for Bribery

Kabbalist Rabbi Yoshiyahu Pinto served one year in prison after being convicted of bribery and other corruption offenses.

Rabbi Yoshiyahu Pinto was released from prison early Wednesday morning after serving a one-year sentence for bribery. The senior police commander Ephraim Bracha, who was involved in the corruption scandal, later committed suicide.

The disgraced kabbalist rabbi was convicted of bribing Bracha, who was head of the Israel Police National Fraud Investigation Unit, in May 2015. Pinto was also found guilty of attempted bribery involving a similar sum, and with obstruction of justice.

He was sentenced to one year in prison in a plea bargain and was also ordered to pay a fine of 1 million shekels ($260,000).

His appeal to reduce his sentence to six months’ community service, given his deteriorating medical condition, was denied by the Supreme Court last January.

Pinto is considered one of Israel’s wealthiest rabbis. The great-grandson of a famous Moroccan-born mystic known as the Baba Sali, he amassed his fortune while serving as spiritual guru to the rich and powerful in Israel, New York, and elsewhere.

Posted in R. Avrohom Union, RCC | Comments Off on Will a major news organization do a story on rabbis Avrohom Union of the RCC and R. Moshe Hafutah of 90035

The Pittsburgh Synagogue Slaughter

Joe* says: “You know (spotted your tweet about HIAS) screw the optics I’m going in might paradoxically have a net positive effect. It sounds harsh and it certainly would have better to have not happened on many fronts (the dead and their families obviously) but it does appear to be making the various Jewish factions at least think. Some are soul searching, some are doubling down but is now on the radar. I agree with KMG that catholic groups are perhaps more implicated on average but it perhaps isn’t done with the malice (in places) that some Jewish organisations do it. If it arrests what might be a near autonomic proclivity to welcome migrants, to interject, to ask whether the holocaust is the correct basis by which to consider future movements of people globally it might have some positive externalities. It is interesting the amount of debate this is kicking up and the majority of it is between Jews.”

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* It’s an open question whether Zionism, especially Zabotinsky’s “muscular” and chauvinistic version of it, was itself a causal factor leading to the Holocaust. Hitler cited it as evidence that Jews were a separate nation, not part of the body politic.

Crediting Jabotinsky with supposed “foresight”, therefore, may be giving undue credit to what was in fact a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you yelled to the four winds that your neighbors are dangerous and cannot be trusted, and that as between you, you were not really neighbors or countrymen, how would your neighbors come to view you?

>>Talk about blaming the messenger/victims. If Jabotinsky had never been born, the outcome of the Holocaust would have been exactly the same.

Zionism appeared to influence how Hitler (and others?) perceived Jews, in terms of whether Jews saw themselves as sharing a common destiny with other peoples in their respective European nations, or whether they saw themselves as separate, alien. We also know that some Zionist groups collaborated with the Nazis toward having Jews emigrate to “their own” homeland.

And what does it say about your prejudices toward Gentiles that you believe the Holocaust was somehow predestined to happen?

* It is incredibly anti-semitic to imply there is a connection between jewish behavior and things that happen to jews. Similarly, I have a friend who is banned from over 100 bars in our state, but every single time it was 100% the bar owner’s fault.

* I can pretty much guaranty that Bowers’s lived experience of Jewish oppression against him personally was insufficient for him to seek revenge – his hatred was given shape by third parties which in today’s context means hate sites (and he added to the echo chamber). ONLY by hate sites. Bowers has never had an original thought in his life.

* My heart goes out to the victims and their loved ones. The shooter claims he’s upset about the Muslim refugee importation program supported by HIAS, but he should take a good look at the Catholic church and Lutheran church, two of the biggest importers of Muslim “refugees”. How did he think Minnesota became North Somalia?

The left needs to decide on a consistent narrative. Whenever a mass shooting occurs, if the victims are white, the shooter is just “mentally ill”, but if the victims are non-white, the shooter is immediately pinned as evil hateful Satan reincarnate. Either they are all mentally ill, or they are all evil hateful Satan reincarnate, enough with the double standard.

* US Resettlement Agencies

These resettlement agencies provide services to refugees through their affiliate offices in cities across the U.S. For a list of resettlement agencies in your area, please click here. This link will take you to the Refugee Processing Center (RPC) that contains an updated Affiliate Directory as well as Agency Affiliate maps. The RPC is operated by the U.S. Department of State Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM), which uses an interactive computer system called the Worldwide Refugee Admissions Processing System (WRAPS) in order to process and track the movement of refugees from various countries around the world to the U.S. for resettlement. Refugees are resettled across the country through affiliate offices of the nine national resettlement agencies (listed below) that resettle refugees on behalf of the U.S. Government. Resettlement agencies help newly arrived refugees settle into local communities and provide a wide range of services that promote self-sufficiency, such as employment and language skill classes. In addition to refugee integration, several of the agencies also provide comprehensive immigration services to assist refugees on their path to becoming permanent residents or U.S. citizens.

For additional information on the nine national resettlement agencies, please click on the links below.

Church World Service
http://www.churchworldservice.org

Ethiopian Community Development Council
http://www.ecdcinternational.org

Episcopal Migration Ministries
http://www.espiscopalchurch.org/emm

Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society
http://www.hias.org

International Rescue Committee
http://www.theirc.org

Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service
http://www.lirs.org

U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants
http://www.refugees.org

United States Conference of Catholic Bishops/Migration and Refugee Services
http://www.usccb.org

World Relief
http://www.wr.org

* Jews are indeed over represented in media ownership and in Fortune 500 lists. The same media that was saying a few weeks ago that it was racist to point out that whites shouldn’t have the land they disproportionately own in South Africa stolen from them without compensation are now saying that it is anti-semitic to point out exactly what Jews themselves have bragged about in the past.

It is this kind of blatant hypocrisy that leads people to anti-semitism. People aren’t dumb. A lot of them see the truth. It’s not just that Jews own stuff that makes some anti-semitic, it’s that some of them in the media lie about it while hypocritically attacking other racial groups like Asians applying to Harvard or South African Whites who are or might be over represented elsewhere. If Jews had been more honest about this and had then condemned what the government of South Africa was about to do in stealing White properties, there would be a much stronger argument for “so what?” when it comes to people pointing out what I just did. However, Jews are NOT the superhumans some make them out to be and are, unfortunately, just as short-sighted as most other peoples.

* Even most Jews with very conservative, far right, or Alt-Right views and sympathies, like many Jewish readers and commentors at The Unz Review, are very uncomfortable and defensive about the topic of “jewish power” and regard it as irrelevant and a red herring promoted by anti-Semites.

* I don’t think Ron’s [Unz] eccentric personality or ethnicity has anything to do with the validity of his ideas.

They are wrong independently of who makes them.

His low agreeablity and anger at criticism however lead him to piling mistake upon mistake. My overall impression is of an overgrown adolescent saying things to annoy his square parents, not an intellectual interested in the truth. This is why he can’t even get people like Greg Cochran to engage with him.

* Pittsburgh has fewer immigrants than any other largish American city. Hispanics are noticeably absent from the area. It’s the one American city that still feels like America.

* Ron Unz: If he’d lived in CA, where probably something like 60% of the population comes from a recent immigrant background and 40+% is Hispanic, he’d have had a much more realistic view of immigrants. Even most overwhelmingly white states have lots of immigrants these days.

But he lived in a place that has very few, so he believed all the total nonsense he found on FoxNews and Breitbart.

Then he wandered around the Internet a little, and eventually discovered (correctly) that Jews were probably the group most strongly supportive of heavy immigration, which shocked him. Next, he also discovered (correctly) Jews had a great deal of control over the MSM, and decided that was the reason that the ongoing race war between whites and immigrants in CA wasn’t being reported.

Now it’s perfectly true that Jews are one of the most influential pro-immigration elements and also that they have huge MSM influence. The problem is that when you mix together with some of the crazy stuff from FoxNews/Breitbart, you end up with a pretty dangerous combination…

* “If you like big city amenities, Pittsburgh came through the post civil rights crime wave with more of them intact than all but the most expensive cities.” (@Steve_Sailer)

* It would be very helpful if other Jews would call these people out. Or if Jews organized to oppose immigration or defend the integrity of US borders. Where are they?

* Here’s a pro-tip: if you are hunting for liberal internationalists in Pittsburgh, Saturday morning services at a Conservative synagogue are a really lousy place to hunt. Your luck would be much better down at the Carnegie Mellon faculty club or even one of those Episcopal churches that have lesbian priests.

* The thing with Gab is that it was a worthwhile experiment in free speech & had much potential. Torba could have improved the moderation & decorum, but he made a stand and wasn’t very open to advice. Half of the problem is that too many folks got squeamish at the 1488 stuff and decided to bail out. If enough of a mass of more articulate folks had held firm, it would have tipped the balance and made it a more appealing site. If you want hard fought liberties to continue, it won’t always be a sunny walk in a meadow. Make a stand.

* Libel as in generalized negative statements about Jews purported as facts, such as Jews being dishonest.

Libel as in false, negative and defamatory statements about individual Jews. Examples:

1. Deborah Lipstadt, in the Holocaust post. Ron makes all kinds of assertions about hysterical or wrong statements in her book on Holocaust revisionists. Her book can be downloaded as a PDF from Library Genesis so it is particularly easy to check Ron’s claims. All his key statements about her were false, nor was Lipstadt the irrational screaming yenta he said she was. (He also compared her to a Jewish prostitute, which is pretty defamatory.) The Holocaust thread was closed so there is no opportunity to correct these blatant errors under the post.

2. Nurit Baytch, in the current Harvard admission discrimination post and earlier discussions of the same matter. She did a replication of Ron’s Jewish surname counting method on the Harvard undergraduate directory, coming up with 5-9% (consistent with Ron’s counts of National Merit PSAT high score lists). Instead of acknowledging or answering this at any time in the past 5 years, Ron attacks her as stupid, incompetent, “Jewish berserker”, “Jewish fanatic”, and similar terms. In reality Baytch never attacked Ron personally or did anything except address his statistical analysis.

3. Janet Mertz, also on the Harvard discrimination articles. Described in similar terms as Baytch although she very strictly limited herself to the numerical counting issues and was totally polite to Ron. I guess she is lucky Ron didn’t call her a hooker as he did to Lipstadt.

Baytch did more than one replication using J1J2, and each estimate was tighter than 5-9%. She counted the public directory, the Harvard-internal online directory, Facebook pages, and alumni directories. The lowest number was 5% and the highest 9%, and all the intervals were of width 1-2. I gave the min/max range as that’s what I remembered and any of the sub-estimates would have only made the point stronger.

Those replication tests, individually and in toto, were consistent with (i.e. in the same range as) Ron’s estimate of 6-7 percent of the PSAT high scores, contradicting his claims of massive overrepresentation of Jews at Harvard vs NMS once the same method is used on both data sets.

That is Nurit Baytch’s key (and unanswered) argument. She refined it further in the paper by accounting for state by state differences in NMS cutoffs and representation at Harvard, among other analyses, but the basic problem for Ron’s argument is the above. Ron has spent 5 years talking about everything else including NB’s physical appearance, intelligence, ethnicity and personality, and other things from her paper besides the replication tests. His summary of the situation in the current Harvard admissions piece omits her main point, the replications, and contains (incorrect) arguments refuting other parts of her paper. What is needed is an explanation of why the J1-J2 replications are not devastating to his argument. e.g., if the J1J2 estimators undercount Harvard Jews, why wouldn’t they undercount NMS-Jews to a similar extent?

Ron and Baytch derive different estimates (25% and ~13%) from the Crimson survey with 9.5% self-reported Jews. As it happens, Baytch’s method is much better there too. But it does not touch the matter of “replication failure”.

Ron refused to answer my questions about this in the Harvard admission thread, based on the non sequitur that something or other is wrong with me, as though (even if true) that could be an answer to calculations by a third party.

With regard to the slander of Lipstadt, things I remember at the moment are the claim that she used the Soviet estimate of 4 million dead at Auschwitz, when in fact she made of point of stating that nobody considers that number credible but it appeared on a plaque at the memorial site; and the claim that she dramatically calls someone the “godfather” of American holocaust denial (this word does not appear in the book). Of course there is also generalized invective about her hysterics, incompetence and knowledge limited to History 101 classes at college. But the factual claims about her book are wrong.

I have not seen anything personal from Baytch to Unz except that when he called her too dumb to understand simple algebra, she pointed out that she was a Harvard summa cum laude physics graduate and Ron only a magna. If you know a more serious example let us know, and also how it compares to Ron’s remarks about her.

* Chomsky isn’t very welcome to publish on oped pages in the US. He’s a big deal abroad, but tends to be shunned by the mainstream media in the US.

* The “crank” phenomenon (Unz, Fischer, Chomsky, etc.) is not uniquely Jewish but Jews are overrepresented even beyond their overrepresentation in the far right tail of the IQ distribution (which is already considerable). Aside from the genetic IQ factors, I think that there are cultural factors which account for the difference. As someone mentioned, the Jewish apostate or convert (who knows and betrays the “secrets of the Jews”) has for centuries been a sort of stock figure in Western culture and who often received praise, honors and reinforcement from the larger society. Whereas vice versa is pretty much non-existent.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on The Pittsburgh Synagogue Slaughter