‘No one has the faintest idea of how to prevent major mental illness.’ (12-12-24)

01:00 New York Post: OnlyFans model cries after sleeping with 101 men in a day: ‘Sometimes I feel so robotic’, https://nypost.com/2024/12/11/lifestyle/onlyfans-model-lily-phillips-cries-after-sleeping-with-101-men-in-a-day/
08:00 Failing the Severely Mentally Ill, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9kTPLfK7ZM
25:20 The wit of the child wards off the parent’s depression, https://x.com/lukeford/status/1867313436742627570
27:00 How do you prevent major mental illness?, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158215
28:00 Niche construction, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158213
29:00 Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers (1986), https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158211
31:00 Insane Consequences: How the Mental Health Industry Fails the Mentally Ill (2017), https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158209
33:00 DJ Jaffe’s TED Talk at NatCon18, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Eh_Keo5Xjw
48:00 What is a hero system according to Ernest Becker?, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158207
50:00 Commentary magazine crew: Pro Publica vs Pete Hegseth, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGiC0OQSahw
54:00 Explain buffered identity in liberalism, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158199
1:00:00 British business culture vs American, https://x.com/Thomashornall/status/1866433916027973671
1:05:00 ‘Conservative Claims of Cultural Oppression: On the Nature and Origins of Conservaphobia’ by Rony Guldmann, https://lukeford.net/blog/?p=158193
1:20:45 Reason: We Shut Down State Mental Hospitals. Some Want to Bring Them Back., https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J9aRo-aRRY0
1:34:20 Iran’s Next Move – with Raz Zimmt,
1:38:30 Mark Halperin on Trump Transition News, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPcrobfaLjI
1:45:00 The 2024 Elections: What Happened and What’s Next? | DealBook Summit 2024, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHBFl17RqL0
2:00:00 Democrats are a bigger mess than people know right now
2:02:00 Trump governs from the outside in while Biden governs from the inside out
2:04:00 Is Iran’s Islamic regime vulnerable? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGR7ZZ9P02M
2:11:00 The media appears chastened by Trump’s resounding victory
2:43:00 DJ Jaffe’s Legacy and the Future of Mental Illness Policy Reform, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhn7-aR7Xmw

Posted in America, Psychiatry | Comments Off on ‘No one has the faintest idea of how to prevent major mental illness.’ (12-12-24)

New York Post: OnlyFans model cries after sleeping with 101 men in a day: ‘Sometimes I feel so robotic’

According to the New York Post:

Lily Phillips, 23, had sex with over a hundred men in a day back in October to create some scandalous content for her subscription-based social media page.

But despite previously insisting that she enjoyed the extreme stunt, all that sex didn’t make her feel good.

“Sometimes I feel so robotic,” Phillips admitted in YouTuber Josh Pieters’ documentary titled, “I Slept With 100 Men in One Day.”

The British sex worker fought back tears as she recalled that day.

“I think by the 30th when we’re getting on a bit, I’ve got a routine of how we’re going to do this and sometimes you disassociate and it’s not like normal sex at all,” Phillips said.

Although it was a momentously frisky feat, it wasn’t all that memorable for the young woman, who admitted she didn’t remember much of it…

Phillips shared that it’s not just the physical intimacy of having sex with so many men that made her feel “so bad” but also disappointing them by not being able talk with them, or even being interested in doing so.

She said that conversing with them was also “hard” and recounted how one man complained that they only chatted for about two minutes when she had said beforehand that they would talk for about five minutes…

When asked if she thinks she should feel bad about not talking with each man for a set amount of time, Phillips explained that she felt she had disappointed her supporters.

“I guess when you’ve promised something to people who support you, it’s kinda hard to let them down,” she said.

The sex worker also admitted that she hadn’t yet processed what she did on that day, but said she wouldn’t forget the day of her emotional interview.

I wrote about the porn industry from 1995 to 2007. I found the experience often retarded my thinking. The more time I spent around porn, the dumber I got. Friends would say to me: “I remember when you were smart.” Other people noted how I became more coarse and more socially inappropriate the more time I spent around porners.

There are probably many revelations and many forms of knowledge that are not good for most people. For example, the happily married people I think I know seem to have positively distorted views of their spouse. I wonder if it is possible to love someone and to see them as they are.

I can’t recall examples from history of pornography serving as a stimulus to great intellectual achievement.

What would be the best way for a woman who starred in a 100-man gangbang video to leverage that achievement for success in polite society?

Her ability to disassociate might help her to become a great spy or shock jock.

Would you be proud to introduce this woman to your family and friends as your future bride?

Lily’s mother is her manager.

Posted in Pornography | Comments Off on New York Post: OnlyFans model cries after sleeping with 101 men in a day: ‘Sometimes I feel so robotic’

How do you prevent major mental illness?

“No one has the faintest idea of how to prevent major mental illness,” writes Rael Jean Isaac, coauthor of Madness in the Streets: How Psychiatry and the Law Abandoned the Mentally Ill (2000), in his plug for Insane Consequences: How the Mental Health Industry Fails the Mentally Ill (2017).

I wonder if that is true?

In 2001, Allan V. Horwitz, a sociologist of medicine, published the book Creating Mental Illness. According to the publisher:

…Allan V. Horwitz argues that our current conceptions of mental illness as a disease fit only a small number of serious psychological conditions and that most conditions currently regarded as mental illness are cultural constructions, normal reactions to stressful social circumstances, or simply forms of deviant behavior.

“Horwitz properly identifies the financial incentives that urge therapists and drug companies to proliferate psychiatric diagnostic categories. He correctly identifies the stranglehold that psychiatric diagnosis has on research funding in mental health. Above all, he provides a sorely needed counterpoint to the most strident advocates of disease-model psychiatry.”—Mark Sullivan, Journal of the American Medical Association

Horwitz would agree with Rael’s point for right now, but in the future, things might get better.

Grok says these are the key points of Horwitz’s book:

Critique of Disease Model: Horwitz challenges the widespread acceptance of mental illness as a biological disease, suggesting that this perspective serves financial interests like those of therapists, drug companies, and mental health advocacy groups. He argues that the expansion of psychiatric diagnoses has led to the medicalization of normal human emotions and behaviors.
Historical Context: The book traces the historical development of psychiatric diagnosis, particularly focusing on the transition from the dynamic psychiatry of the mid-20th century to the diagnostic psychiatry introduced with DSM-III in 1980. He discusses how this shift expanded the scope of what is considered mental illness.
Social Construction: Horwitz posits that many conditions labeled as mental disorders are actually shaped by cultural and social expectations. He uses examples like hysteria, multiple personality disorder, and depression to illustrate how societal pressures and norms influence what gets pathologized.
Biological vs. Social Causes: While acknowledging that some mental disorders might have biological underpinnings, Horwitz emphasizes that social factors often play a more significant role in the expression of these conditions. He critiques the overreliance on pharmaceutical treatments when social interventions might be more effective.
Implications for Treatment: The book suggests that by broadening the definition of mental illness, psychiatry might be doing more harm than good by pathologizing normal life experiences. Horwitz advocates for a more nuanced approach where social responses or environmental adjustments could be more beneficial than medical treatments.
Critique of Psychiatric Practices: He discusses how the diagnostic criteria have become overly inclusive, leading to an inflation in the number of people considered mentally ill, which in turn affects research funding, treatment modalities, and public perception of mental health.

Overall, “Creating Mental Illness” is a critique that calls for a reevaluation of how mental disorders are defined, diagnosed, and treated, advocating for a model that integrates social context more deeply into understanding human distress.

I asked Grok if Allan Horwitz believed we can prevent major mental illness and it said:

…Horwitz does acknowledge that some severe psychological conditions, like schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, might fit traditional disease models, suggesting that for these specific cases, prevention could involve more conventional medical approaches, although he critiques the broad application of disease models to all mental health issues.

In summary, while Horwitz does not outright state that mental illness can be “prevented” in a medical sense for all conditions, his work implies that a significant portion of what is currently diagnosed as mental illness might be mitigated or re-conceptualized through changes in social policy, cultural attitudes, and the environment rather than solely through medical prevention strategies. His perspective encourages a re-evaluation of what we consider as mental illness and how we address it, focusing less on prevention through medicine and more on understanding and addressing the social context.

According to Grok:

Preventing major mental illness involves a combination of lifestyle, environmental, and early intervention strategies. Here are several approaches based on available research and recommendations:

Early Intervention and Awareness:
Recognizing early warning signs such as changes in sleep or appetite, mood swings, or social withdrawal can lead to earlier interventions. This can potentially reduce the severity or even delay the onset of mental illness. Engaging with mental health professionals at the onset of symptoms is crucial.

Lifestyle Modifications:
Physical Activity: Regular exercise has been shown to reduce stress, anxiety, and depression, contributing positively to mental well-being. It can also help in regulating mood and reducing symptoms of mental health disorders.

Nutrition: A balanced diet rich in nutrients supports overall health, including mental health. Specific nutrients like Vitamin D and B12 might play roles in mood regulation.

Sleep: Quality sleep is essential for mental health. Poor sleep habits are linked to an increased risk of mental disorders.

Social and Emotional Support:
Building and maintaining strong social connections can provide emotional support, reduce feelings of loneliness, and act as a buffer against mental health issues. Engaging in activities with others or having supportive relationships can be protective.

Practices like gratitude, meditation, and yoga are suggested for managing stress and enhancing mental resilience.

Mental Health Education and Stigma Reduction:
Public health campaigns and education can promote understanding and reduce stigma, encouraging people to seek help when needed. This forms part of primary prevention by fostering an environment where mental health is openly discussed and addressed.

Parenting and Early Childhood Support:
For children and adolescents, interventions like parenting education, support for children of mentally ill parents, and programs aimed at teaching emotional regulation can be effective in preventing later mental health issues.

Policy and Environmental Changes:
Broader societal changes, such as improving housing, nutrition, education, and economic security, can significantly impact mental health outcomes. Policies that address these social determinants contribute to preventing mental health disorders.

Professional Help:
For those at higher risk or showing early signs, seeking professional help like therapy or counseling can be preventive. This includes strategies tailored to individual needs to manage or mitigate risk factors.

While these strategies can help in prevention, it’s important to acknowledge that not all mental illnesses can be prevented due to genetic, biological, or other complex factors. However, implementing these preventive measures can significantly reduce the likelihood or severity of mental health problems for many individuals.

Posted in Psychiatry | Comments Off on How do you prevent major mental illness?

Everybody wants to change the world

A few years ago, I developed the realization that every form of life wants to transform the world and that these efforts inevitably harm other forms of life, thus creating a war for survival.

When I talked about this with a philosopher of biology, he gave me the term “niche construction.”

According to Grok:

Niche construction in biology refers to the process by which organisms modify their own and sometimes other species’ environments, thereby altering the selection pressures and evolutionary pathways in those environments. Here’s a breakdown of the concept:

Active Modification: Organisms actively change their habitats through behaviors or physical alterations. Examples include:
Beavers building dams, which create pond habitats.
Earthworms improving soil structure through burrowing.
Birds nesting, which modifies local conditions for both themselves and potentially other species.
Passive Modification: This occurs when the mere presence or byproducts of an organism’s life processes change the environment. For example:
Coral reefs creating diverse ecosystems by their existence.
Trees altering microclimates or soil composition through leaf litter.
Evolutionary Feedback: Niche construction can lead to an evolutionary feedback loop where changes in the environment caused by organisms can influence their own evolution, as well as that of other species:
Changes in habitat can lead to new selection pressures, favoring traits that are advantageous in the modified environment.
Over time, this can result in co-evolution between species and their environments.
Ecological Impact: By altering their environment, species can increase their own survival rates, expand their range, or even create new niches for other species to exploit. This can lead to increased biodiversity but can also sometimes result in less obvious ecological consequences.
Contrast with Traditional Natural Selection: While traditional views of natural selection focus on how environments select for certain traits, niche construction emphasizes how organisms can also select or engineer their environments.

Niche construction broadens our understanding of evolutionary biology by acknowledging that organisms are not just passive recipients of environmental pressures but active participants in shaping their ecological niches. This concept has implications for conservation biology, ecological restoration, and understanding complex ecosystems.

Posted in Biology | Comments Off on Everybody wants to change the world

Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers (1986)

According to Grok:

Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers” by Richard E. Neustadt and Ernest R. May is a seminal work that explores how historical understanding can improve decision-making processes in both government and business. Here’s a summary of the key points:

Main Thesis:
The authors argue that understanding history is crucial for decision-makers because it provides context, patterns, and analogies that can guide current and future actions. By thinking in time, leaders can avoid repeating past mistakes and capitalize on historical successes.

Key Concepts:

Historical Analogy:
Decision-makers often rely on analogies from history to understand current problems. However, the book cautions against simplistic or misleading analogies, advocating for a deeper analysis to ensure the parallels are relevant and accurate.
Time Horizons:
The authors discuss the importance of considering both short-term and long-term implications of decisions. They critique the tendency to focus on immediate outcomes at the expense of future considerations.
Framing Questions:
They suggest that decision-makers should frame their questions historically: What past events are relevant? How have similar situations been resolved before? What were the outcomes of those resolutions?
Bias and Perspective:
Neustadt and May highlight how biases can distort the use of history. They encourage decision-makers to recognize their own biases and those inherent in historical accounts they use.
Case Studies:
The book uses several case studies, including the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Vietnam War decisions, and domestic policy issues to illustrate how history was either well or poorly applied in real-world scenarios.
Cuban Missile Crisis: A positive example where President Kennedy’s administration used historical lessons to navigate the crisis, considering precedents like the Bay of Pigs invasion.
Vietnam War: A cautionary tale where historical analogies (like the Munich agreement) were misapplied, leading to escalation.
Practical Advice:
They recommend practical steps like setting up “devil’s advocate” roles in decision-making teams to challenge assumptions, encouraging a culture of questioning and learning from history.
Learning from History:
The book isn’t just about using history but learning from it in an ongoing manner. They advocate for a continuous process where each decision becomes a lesson for future decisions.

Conclusion:
“Thinking in Time” concludes by reinforcing that historical knowledge isn’t just about memorizing events but about understanding the dynamic interplay of events over time. It’s an essential read for anyone in a decision-making role, emphasizing that history is not just a record of the past but a toolkit for the present and future.

This work is particularly recommended for leaders, strategists, and policy-makers who wish to enhance their decision-making with a more nuanced understanding of history.

Posted in History | Comments Off on Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers (1986)

Insane Consequences: How the Mental Health Industry Fails the Mentally Ill (2017)

Grok summarizes this book by DJ Jaffe:

Core Argument: Jaffe argues that the mental health industry has largely abandoned the most seriously mentally ill in favor of promoting “mental wellness” among a much larger, less symptomatic population. This shift, he claims, has led to dire consequences for those with severe mental illnesses like schizophrenia and severe bipolar disorder.
Statistics and Consequences: Despite an annual expenditure of $147 billion, Jaffe highlights that approximately 140,000 seriously mentally ill individuals are homeless, and 390,000 are incarcerated. This situation arises because psychiatric hospitals have been closed, and criteria for involuntary commitment have become so narrow that preventive measures are often overlooked, leading to increased public endangerment and suffering among the mentally ill and their families.
Criticism of Policies: Jaffe criticizes policies driven by the mental health industry and government for focusing on less severe mental health issues while neglecting those with serious mental illness. He uses various documents, scientific journals, and personal advocacy experiences spanning thirty years to illustrate how these policies have led to negative outcomes like increased homelessness, incarceration, and violence.
Proposed Reforms: The book suggests a series of reforms aimed at prioritizing treatment for the most seriously ill, advocating for smarter, more compassionate, and affordable approaches that would redirect resources from mental “health” initiatives to mental “illness” treatment. These include better use of existing funds, more appropriate commitment laws, and focusing on those who are most in need rather than the general population.

Posted in Psychiatry | Comments Off on Insane Consequences: How the Mental Health Industry Fails the Mentally Ill (2017)

What is a hero system according to Ernest Becker?

Grok says: According to Ernest Becker, a “hero system” is essentially a cultural or societal framework that provides individuals with opportunities to achieve a sense of heroism, which is crucial for managing the fear of mortality and the human need for meaning and self-esteem. Becker describes society itself as a “symbolic action system, a structure of statuses and roles, customs and rules for behavior, designed to serve as a vehicle for earthly heroism.” Each culture has its own unique hero system, characterized by different roles and standards of heroism, from high-profile figures like Churchill or Buddha to everyday heroism like that of a coal miner or a simple priest.

These hero systems are not just about physical bravery but encompass any endeavor that gives individuals a sense of cosmic significance or lasting value beyond their mortal existence. Whether a system is magical, religious, primitive, secular, scientific, or civilized, it serves the same purpose: to allow individuals to earn feelings of “primary value, of cosmic specialness, of ultimate usefulness to creation, of unshakable meaning” by contributing something of perceived lasting worth to society. This could be through tangible creations like buildings or through intangible contributions like raising a family over generations.

Becker argues that these hero systems are fundamentally about denying death; they help individuals to feel they have transcended the mere biological reality of life and death by achieving something that outlives or outshines their own decay. In essence, every society functions as a “religion” in this context, providing myths and roles for people to fulfill their need for heroism, which Becker sees as a central problem of human life, deeply rooted in our nature and the need for self-esteem.

Posted in Ernest Becker | Comments Off on What is a hero system according to Ernest Becker?

Does Kamala Harris have a drinking problem?

Grok says:

The question of whether Kamala Harris has a drinking problem has been the subject of various rumors and discussions, particularly during her political campaigns. However, there is no concrete evidence from reputable sources to support these claims.

Rumors and Speculation: Social media and some news outlets have circulated rumors about Harris having a “drinking problem,” often pushed by political adversaries during election times. These claims largely stem from unverified posts and opinions shared on platforms like X (formerly Twitter), where individuals have speculated about her behavior at public events or her manner of speaking during speeches. For instance, some posts on X suggested that her aides manage her schedule to avoid unscripted interactions, hinting at a potential issue with sobriety. However, these are speculative and anecdotal observations rather than factual reports.

Official Statements and Fact Checks: Official responses from Harris’s team or fact-checking organizations have consistently debunked or not confirmed these rumors. A Reuters fact-check in 2020 clarified that a photo purportedly showing Harris inebriated was actually a misleading still from a video where she was congratulating runners at a Thanksgiving event. Similarly, another Reuters article debunked a video claiming to show Harris drunk by confirming it was digitally slowed down. These fact-checks suggest that many of the claims are based on manipulated or misinterpreted media.

Public Appearances and Behavior: Harris’s public appearances, speeches, and interactions have been scrutinized, with critics sometimes interpreting her demeanor or speech patterns as signs of intoxication. However, such interpretations can often be subjective or politically motivated. There’s no consistent pattern of behavior reported by credible sources that would confirm a drinking problem.

Conclusion: Without definitive evidence, any assertion that Kamala Harris has a drinking problem remains speculative and part of political discourse rather than fact. It’s important to approach such claims with caution, recognizing the potential for misinformation in politically charged environments. If there were substantial, verified evidence, it would likely be reported by mainstream, reputable news sources, which has not been the case.

Posted in Kamala Harris | Comments Off on Does Kamala Harris have a drinking problem?

Why did the news media hide Joe Biden’s senility?

Grok says:

The topic of whether the news media deliberately hid Joe Biden’s cognitive decline is complex and contentious, with various perspectives offering different interpretations:

Media Coverage and Denial:
Some argue that there was a concerted effort by the media to downplay or ignore signs of Biden’s cognitive decline due to political bias. Critics claim that this was done to protect Biden’s candidacy and presidency, especially in light of his age and the importance of his health in public perception. This perspective is reflected in posts on X where users express frustration over what they perceive as media cover-ups or gaslighting regarding Biden’s mental acuity.

Journalistic Challenges:
On the other hand, journalists and media outlets have faced challenges in reporting on this sensitive topic. Some sources suggest that discussing Biden’s mental fitness was often met with accusations of ageism or political bias. Media outlets have reported on Biden’s age and occasional gaffes, but the extent to which these were framed as signs of senility or simply as part of normal aging varies. A Politico article discusses the media’s role, highlighting that while there wasn’t a complete lack of coverage, the narrative was often nuanced, balancing between concern for his age and acknowledgment of his competence.

Public Perception and Political Strategy:
There’s also a viewpoint that the media’s handling of Biden’s cognitive state was influenced by the broader political landscape, including the stark contrast with Donald Trump’s behavior and controversies. The coverage might have been cautious to not appear partisan, especially given the polarized political climate. Some in the media have argued that focusing too much on Biden’s age could inadvertently aid Trump, leading to a more measured approach in their reporting.

Defense and Justification:
Defenders of the media’s approach argue that age-related gaffes or memory lapses do not necessarily equate to senility or incapacity to govern. Experts cited in various reports emphasize that occasional slips in memory are part of normal aging and not indicative of dementia or significant cognitive decline. Moreover, Biden’s administration has often highlighted his capability and legislative achievements to counter such narratives.

Retrospective Analysis:
After significant public events like debates where Biden’s performance was widely scrutinized, some media retrospectives admitted that perhaps the coverage of Biden’s age and cognitive abilities wasn’t aggressive enough. However, this reflection came with the acknowledgment that the complexities of reporting on such issues involve considerations of fairness, privacy, and the potential impact on democratic processes.

In summary, the narrative around the media’s coverage of Biden’s cognitive health involves a mix of political strategy, journalistic ethics, public perception, and the inherent challenges of reporting on mental health in a high-profile figure. The debate continues with no unanimous agreement on the media’s actions or intentions.

Posted in Journalism | Comments Off on Why did the news media hide Joe Biden’s senility?

Explain buffered identity in liberalism

Grok says:

Answer
Buffered identity in liberalism refers to a concept developed by philosopher Charles Taylor in his exploration of secularism and modernity, specifically within the framework of his book “A Modern Social Imaginary” and “Sources of the Self.” Here’s a breakdown of the idea:

Definition:
Buffered Identity: This term contrasts with what Taylor calls “porous selves.” A buffered identity is one where the individual experiences a clear distinction between their inner self and the external world. This sense of self is “buffered” or protected from direct influence by external forces like spirits, gods, or societal pressures in a way that was not as pronounced in pre-modern societies.

Key Aspects:
Secularization:
The concept arises with the secularization of society, where the boundary between the self and the world becomes more impermeable. In pre-modern times, people were considered to have “porous” selves, open to cosmic forces, spirits, or divine interventions. In contrast, modern individuals are seen as self-contained, with a clear boundary separating the inner psychological life from external influences.
Individual Autonomy:
Buffered identity supports the liberal value of autonomy. Individuals with buffered identities believe in the capacity for self-governance, making decisions based on personal reason rather than external spiritual or communal dictates. This autonomy is central to liberal philosophy which values personal freedom and choice.
Disenchantment:
This buffering also relates to what Max Weber called the “disenchantment of the world,” where the world loses its magical or mystical qualities. The buffered self navigates a world where natural causes, rather than supernatural ones, explain phenomena.
Privacy and Inner Life:
There’s an emphasis on the development of an inner psychological life, where one’s thoughts, feelings, and beliefs are private domains. This privacy supports the liberal notion of rights to one’s own beliefs, expressions, and lifestyle without undue interference.
Social and Moral Implications:
The buffered self can lead to a more individualistic society but also to a challenge in understanding or empathizing with others whose experiences might be described as more “porous.” It can foster a more atomized society where communal bonds might be weaker, or it can lead to a society where personal freedom is paramount.

Criticism and Reflections:
Critics argue that this buffering might lead to isolation, where individuals are less connected to each other or to a larger communal or cosmic narrative. There’s also a critique that this framework might undervalue or misunderstand cultures or individuals for whom the boundaries between self and world are not as sharp.
Supporters might see it as a necessary evolution for personal freedom and the development of liberal democratic societies where individual rights are respected.

In summary, buffered identity in liberalism is about how modern individuals perceive themselves as separate from external influences, fostering a sense of autonomy, privacy, and a secular approach to life. This concept helps explain shifts in social structures, personal identity, and the moral landscape of liberal societies.

Posted in Philosophy | Comments Off on Explain buffered identity in liberalism