Europe Is Drowning In Refugees

Paul Wood writes: The Australians insist asylum seekers move on after three years. For some reason that I do not understand, in Europe asylum seekers are not given asylum for a year or two and are then asked to leave but allowed to settle permanently, which is why centuries from now Germany will always have large Arab and Kurdish minorities. This will be irrevocable.

Refugees have every reason to want to live in Europe. It is Europe’s duty to the refugees and, more important, to future generations of Europeans to stop accepting any asylum seekers from other continents. No one drowns trying to get to Singapore because Singapore accepts no asylum seekers. This is the only way the drownings will stop.

We can pay poor countries to take them for us. I wonder how many Syrians and Libyans will accept refuge in Burkina Faso. We can try the experiment and see.

About half of the Vietnamese “boat people” who managed to reach Hong Kong during the 1980s were repatriated by the British to the Communist regime—somewhere between 60,000 and 70,000. Many went to the United States. Many others were kept cooped up in squalid conditions for the best part of a decade. But times have changed, and Europe will take many of the tidal wave of asylum seekers and economic migrants. As more are taken, more will come.

Some think the population of Africa alone may grow by one billion over the next 30 years. As populations grow and developing countries grow richer, the numbers of migrants, legal and illegal, will increase by leaps and bounds. The only alternative to indigenous inhabitants becoming a minority in each Western European country is to do what former German chancellor Gerhard Schröder recently said we must not do—create a Fortress Europe.

Adm. Christopher Parry, one of the Royal Navy’s cleverest strategists, warned in a paper in 2006 that Britain and Europe faced being overrun by mass migration from the Third World within 30 years because of population growth and environmental destruction. The Internet, cheap flights, and free international phone calls would hinder assimilation. (Is there anything left to assimilate to nowadays?)

He compared the plight of the West with that of the Roman Empire in the fifth century. The Blair government liked to encourage senior public servants to indulge in blue-sky thinking, but Admiral Parry had taken it too far. He was silenced and accused of racism.

Nine years have gone past since then, and he seems prescient.

What is clear now is that while Vladimir Putin is bad news, and ISIS much worse news, the real threat to Europe is not from Russia but from asylum seekers.

Posted in Europe, Immigration | Comments Off on Europe Is Drowning In Refugees

There’s No Powerful Jewish Lobby

Ken Kurson, editor of the New York Observer, posts on FB: “I’m breaking some news here. I just don’t get this guy [Cory Booker] at all. I had such high hopes for him. I stand dazed and brokenhearted. And as Joel Pollak wrote (I’m paraphrasing…) the next time some asshole talks about the overwhelming strength of the ‘Jewish lobby’ I’m gonna punch him in the fucking neck. Jesus, we can’t even stop an actual nuclear threat from an avowed enemy. Good luck getting Elvis Costello to play.”

Seven months ago, Joel Pollak tweeted: “Being a Democrat in the Age of Obama requires you to believe cops kill black kids on purpose but radical Islamists kill Jews by accident.”

You could just as accurately say: “Being a black in the Age of Obama requires you to believe cops kill black kids on purpose but radical Islamists kill Jews by accident.”

It comes down to who whom? If Iran threatens Israel, why should blacks care? Jews didn’t fund black causes because they cared about blacks (there’s nothing in Torah about funding civil rights for other groups), but because they believed a multi-racial society would be better for Jews.

I’m no historian, but this Cory Booker story seems like a microcosm of Jewish disappointment with American blacks in general who don’t seem appropriately grateful for all Jews have done for them (funding Civil Rights, etc).

Different groups have different interests, so I take it for granted that blacks, Jews, Muslims, whites etc will have plenty of conflicts (within America and without).

I would have been shocked if Cory Booker, who’s black, had not voted with his black president and black caucus. What do blacks care about Iran getting nukes? It’s no threat to them.

Plenty of American Jews, perhaps a majority, support the Iran deal, which is a done deal in any event. Cory Booker’s vote is meaningless regarding the Iran deal but it has meaning in the symbolic sense that he’s independent of much of his Jewish funding and support.

Regarding putting the “Jewish lobby” in quotes, it seems to me that in America there is a China lobby and a Saudi lobby and yes, a Jewish lobby and they all have juice but not always a veto.

Chaim Amalek: “No matter what anyone does, Iran will get the bomb because it thinks it is in its own best interest to get the bomb. And likely, they are right. But then so too will Saudi Arabia and Egypt. If you are a Sunni, the best that can be said for this deal is that it buys time in which your side can build up the infrastructure necessary to manufacture fission and fusion type weapons of your own.”

Ken Kurson writes on Observer.com:

EXCLUSIVE: In Damage Control Mode, Cory Booker Invites Jews to Emergency Summit

Senator scrambles to save face—and future contributions—in the wake of support for Iran deal

The Observer has learned that Senator Cory Booker, who is under fire from Jewish supporters who had long treated him as one of their own, has convened an unusual emergency meeting to shore up his support in the wake of his decision to support ePresident Obama’s deal with Iran.

Around noon on Friday afternoon, Mr. Booker’s Deputy Chief of Staff, George Helmy, started emailing leaders of the Jewish community to invite them to a hastily assembled “small roundtable discussion on the JCPOA in his office.” The meeting, which will take place at the Gateway Center on Tuesday at noon, will be joined by Treasury undersecretary Adam Szubin, who will help explain how, “After weeks weeks [sic] of study and consultation, Senator Booker made the decision he feels in the best interest of Israel, the United States, and our allies.”

Reflecting the seriousness of this issue – and the threat that it poses to his standing in the Jewish community—Mr. Booker is pulling out all stops to kosher his vote. He posted a lengthy essay explaining his decision, so meeting with Jewish leaders has to be perceived as an extension of that. Mr. Szubin has frequently been trotted out by the Obama Administration to placate the Jewish community, which is concerned that the terms of the deal permit Iran to develop a robust nuclear weapons program.

The invitation appeals to its recipients’ vanity, assuring them it is only being “sent to his dearest friends and those whom he relies on for counsel.” For those still not feeling the love, another Booker staffer, Matt Klapper, larded it on hours later, sending a follow-up note asking to “discuss the JCPOA, as well as steps that need to be taken to keep Iran in the corner given the new challenges we’ll soon face.”

Apparently, there’s a second minyan being convened by Mr. Booker, as well – in Livingston, the heart of Essex County’s Jewish community, at 10 am.

The invitation lists comprise a who’s who of influential Jewish leaders in New York and New Jersey, including Raphael Benaroya, the managing director of Biltmore Capital Group; Menachem Genack, the CEO of the Orthodox Union Kosher Division; Lori Fein, the New Jersey Director of the Zionist Organization of America; Ben Chouake, the Englewood, NJ, doctor who heads Norpac, the national PAC that supports Israel-friendly candidates; and Rabbi Aaron Kotler, who leads an important congregation in Lakewood, NJ.

Conspicuously absent from the guest list is Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, whose friendship with Senator Booker is two decades old and had been intensely close before the Iran deal came to the fore. The two had many times traveled to the Rebbe’s grave in Queens, were guests at each other’s family events, and both described their friendship in very warm, near familial tones. Rabbi Boteach has been highly critical of the Iran deal, taking ads in newspapers and organizing rallies to apply pressure to his old friend. The absence of a prominent New Jersey rabbi who had been a close friend may signal that Mr. Booker prefers a room filled with Jewish leaders who have not been as vocally critical.

Posted in Blacks, Iran, Israel, Jews | Comments Off on There’s No Powerful Jewish Lobby

I Wish I Was A Syrian Refugee

I wish I were a Syrian muslim living in Germany or Sweden. My life would be so easy if I were. All my worries would be at an end. And if I saw a pretty woman I wanted to take, her father would let me rape her no questions asked. Not that I would, but still.

Posted in Islam, Personal | Comments Off on I Wish I Was A Syrian Refugee

American Rabbi: Europe must accept immigration swamping

John Graham writes in 2011: Thanks to Jewamongyou’s Blog for drawing my attention to a classic: In Paris, Muslim and Jewish leaders pledge to stand together against the rise of extreme-rightist parties, European Jewish Press 09/Mar/2011

PARIS (EJP)—Prominent Muslim and Jewish leaders from across Europe pledged to stand together against the rise of extreme-right xenophobic and racist parties that represent an escalating peril to ethnic and religious minorities across Europe, including Jews and Muslims.

These leaders made the pledge during a gathering in Paris of the “Coordinating Committee of European Muslim and Jewish Leaders.”

The first meeting of the Coordinating Committee was initiated by the New York-based Foundation for Ethnic Understanding (FFEU), the World Council for Muslim Inter-Faith Relations (WCMIR), and the World Jewish Congress (WJC)…

“If Europe wants to remain true to its ethical and spiritual foundations, it must embrace people from different cultures, religions and ways of life. If not, it will not only fail as a concept, it will lose its soul,” said FFEU President and World Jewish Congress Vice President Rabbi Marc Schneier.

Rabbi Schneier is an American, resident in New York where his foundation is headquartered.

A considerable amount needs to be said about this, and happily Jewamongyou has said it

Sometimes I question the assessment of Jews as an “intelligent people”. If we are so smart, why are those who supposedly represent our people so oblivious to the obvious?…

If anti-Semitism is “growing rapidly” across Europe, perhaps idiots like Rabbi Schneier should consider their own role in causing it. After all, it is the likes of him who give Jews a bad name. He might as well sacrifice Christian children for their blood. How can you dwell in somebody else’s land, promote policies that will surely transform the natives into minorities – and then wonder why people do not like you? I wonder if Rabbi Schneier also promotes massive Arab immigration into Israel. Would he accept scores of Africans into his own home and grant them “equal rights”?

I wonder if during the conference, described in the article, anybody even asked basic questions such as “is there any justification for anti-immigration sentiments among Europeans?” or “might high crime rates among immigrants, and the targeted rape of native European women, have anything to do with the rise of such movements?”

The writer of Jewamongyou is an unusual man. So, it appears, is Rabbi Schneier.

Posted in Immigration, R. Marc Schneier | Comments Off on American Rabbi: Europe must accept immigration swamping

Obama, Immigration, and the Bible

Rabbi Aryeh Spero writes in 2014:

In his Executive Order speech defending what most consider outright amnesty for five million illegal immigrants, President Obama cited the biblical verse in Exodus: “Thou shalt not afflict the stranger (22:20)”. There is no question that unlawful immigrants will soon be awarded a full basket of ongoing social services, as well as a fast track to citizenship. Is the president correct in asserting that we have been afflicting the stranger?

In all matters, the Bible teaches discernment, and there is a distinct difference between not afflicting another as opposed to requiring that we provide them citizenship and subsidize an entire life, especially when the burden of that support falls on the shoulders of overtaxed families, themselves not beneficiaries of such “entitlements.” Basic respect and kindness is one thing — it is a sign of our humanity; onerous sacrifice and national bankruptcy is another, something not required.

The Bible’s primary interest in this matter is a moral one: we all start out as children of God and should thus be treated with civility. In contrast to the biblical community, many ancient societies viewed strangers as fair game to be robbed or incarcerated, or as fodder for harsh sport and brutality. This, the Bible exhorts, was the way of Sodom. Even today, there are cultures and nations where “infidels” and strangers are oppressed and treated as sub-human and as dhimmis.

Yes, the Bible is clear: “One law shall prevail for all.” Basic justice regarding one’s property, personhood, and a right to trial is universal and transcends tribe. However, what serious American citizen would claim “affliction” if not provided complete subsidy? Nor is automatic citizenship the antidote required to prove an absence of affliction. That’s a bar too high…

What separates our current circumstance of immigration from previous ones is precisely the welfare state the U.S. has become and massive immigration’s hefty burden on taxpayers and threat to basic services.

Furthermore, the anti-assimilationist fervor among today’s multicultural ideologues raises the question as to whether America’s historic cultural ethos can survive this huge foreign influx.

Nor is this an issue of race; indeed, many of us admire the qualities of those coming from south of the border.

The Bible’s focus is on morality, and its humane ethos should not be exploited for the political agenda of those Democrats whose ultimate goal is to drastically change demographics so as to ensure the Democrat Party’s dominance and control. Nor did the Bible see its mission as fostering a replacement of an existing society and its identity through a massive Obama-like ‘transformative’ immigration.

Over the years, many in the social-justice crowd have boasted that they “comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.” How ironic that those making the point not to afflict the stranger have a knee-jerk desire to afflict the comfortable, including most of the middle class who daily work hard just to remain afloat. It sounds more like vengeance than it does social justice.

Posted in Immigration, Rabbis | Comments Off on Obama, Immigration, and the Bible

What is the Jewish perspective on the illegal immigration crisis in Israel?

Link: The Torah commands us to care for the foreigners and immigrants among us. Does that extend to illegal immigrants? Is it right to send them back, as is happening now, or are we obligated to take them in and help them?

Here is the Orthodox answer by Rabbi Steven Pruzansky:

The presence of illegal immigrants in Israel presents a most delicate and vexing issue. Emotionally, it is difficult to turn away any person who flees persecution and suffering, as we are quite mindful of our own recent history and the doors that were closed to Jews who wanted to flee Europe. The situation is exacerbated because these refugees are primarily Christians who are fleeing from Muslim persecutors, and ironically seeking safe haven with Jews.
Rationally, though, we recognize that every nation must place limits on the number of foreigners who wish to reside there. If such is true of the largest countries in the world, including the United States, it is certainly true of small Israel. Illegal immigrants currently number in the low hundreds of thousands – not significant in real terms but most substantial in relative terms. In a country with approximately six million Jews, and over a million Arabs, the character and culture of the Jewish state will be diluted once a critical mass of non-Jews is allowed to permanently reside there. If the gates are completely open, Israel can be overrun with another million or more foreigners – non-Jews who do not share the values and destiny of the Jewish people, and the Jewish State will begin to evaporate.
Obviously, the Torah recognizes limitations on a non-Jews’ right to live in the land of Israel. First and foremost, only gerei toshav (literally, resident aliens) – those who formally accept the seven Noachide laws – are allowed to traverse the land of Israel, much less live there. But the numbers have to be monitored so the foreign influences do not predominate. And that is the problem today, along with the fact that we no longer formally accept gerei toshav.
Rav Shlomo Aviner, the Rav of Bet El and one of the great rabbinical leaders in Israel today, notes that most (not all) of the illegal immigrants are law-abiding and have come to Israel to improve their lives. That they do – despite all the threats and problems in Israel – is a tribute to the remarkable character of the State of Israel. But the primary responsibility of Israel has to be to Jews, not non-Jews. Israel is in the process of gathering all Jewish exiles, including us. They will need jobs, homes, and infrastructure. It is simply not possible for Israel to become the world’s haven; it lacks both the physical space and the material resources. He concludes: “We must distinguish between individual morality and communal morality. It is impossible to run a country based on emotions. Everything must be carefully analyzed.”
Therein lies the critical distinction between the Jewish experience and these illegal immigrants. Jewish refugees often sought temporary refuge in friendly countries (like Shanghai, China, declared an international free zone during the Holocaust) but permanent residence in countries where we would be welcomed, and legal residents. We are obligated to offer temporary refuge to any person, to assist him in his time of need. But the emphasis is on “temporary.” The Torah obligates us to assist non-Jews – their poor, their sick, their homeless – in order to set them again on sound footing. But we are certainly not obligated to provide a permanent solution to an international crisis, a “solution” that will surely undermine the viability of the world’s only Jewish state. To channel Justice Robert Jackson, the Torah (like the US Constitution) is not a suicide pact. Nations can operate in their own interests in order to preserve their viability.
An illegal immigrant should have no expectation of remaining in the country that he has infiltrated. The reference in the Torah to the “strangers among us” relates primarily to those in the land when we arrived, and not necessarily to foreigners who came later. Some did, and all are to be treated humanely, but the notion that illegal immigrants have a moral claim on the country to which they emigrated is novel. It is part of the new American ethos that “illegal immigrants” are not really “illegal” but just “undocumented.” But they are more than “undocumented;” they carry no “documents” because, unlike millions of others trying to come to America but are obeying its laws and waiting their turn, they chose to break the law and breach the borders of the country.
The same applies to Israel’s illegal immigrants. The Vietnamese boat people who were admitted in the late 1970s by PM Menachem Begin were admitted because of their desperate plight and their relatively small numbers. The new illegal immigrants are far different in scale, and not all are political refugees. Any nation that has porous borders will soon cease to be a nation, and Israel’s margin is much smaller than most other countries. What is required is an international solution that provides a permanent home to these unfortunates. Otherwise, massive illegal immigration will be among the frightening enemies Israel has to overcome in the next two decades.
Temporary refuge – yes. Permanent home – no. Clearly, the Torah, which delimits the very residence of non-Jews in the land of Israel, endorses the deportation of illegal immigrants, young and old, who would threaten the existence and welfare of the State. Do all have to be deported? Certainly not. But the number of people that need to be deported must be determined by the government which is mainly responsible for the lives and well-being of its citizens. That number will certainly be informed by the humanitarian impulse that characterizes the Jewish personality. As Rav Aviner wrote: “Although we have a great desire to help humanity, our primary obligation is to strengthen ourselves here, and then we can bring a blessing to humanity.”

Here is the Conservative answer by Rabbi Adam Greenwald: “Every sovereign state has the right to regulate its borders and to determine who may immigrate and who may not. For Israel, the challenge of maintaining a uniquely Jewish democracy adds additional variables that must be considered. However, the meaning of “Jewish democracy” cannot only be a question of the religious affiliation of its citizens. A Jewish democracy must be guided by Jewish values, must answer the call of the Jewish soul and of the Jewish conscience.”

Here is the Reform answer by Rabbi Cy Stanway:

As a Jew, I am ashamed at the heavy-handed way Israel is treating these people.

We are a people of compassion and Israel is about compassion, refuge and taking care of the ‘ger toshav’ – the resident alien among us. These people entered illegally, to be sure. But how, exactly, does someone enter legally when they can’t fill out paperwork in Southern Sudan?

The argument that the refugees use is that they are economic refugees and not political refugees. That is probably more true than not. But if people from outside the Land want to help build inside the Land, surely there are other paths for a modern state to take than deportation.

I understand the argument that if Israel takes them in, it will dilute the Jewish demographic of Israel. That is true. But surely Israel can offer temporary visas. How can we, of all people, send people back to a place of hopelessness? If there is a halachic justification for sending people back to despair and desperation, I have yet to find it in any Jewish literature.

I think these answers are representative of the different movements. The more traditional the Jew, the more he cares about Jews and the less he cares about non-Jews. The more liberal the Jew, the more universalistic.

Posted in Immigration, Jews | Comments Off on What is the Jewish perspective on the illegal immigration crisis in Israel?

Durbin, Cupich to discuss immigration reform at Temple Jeremiah

Link: “Immigration is an issue very close to the Jewish people. In our congregation, the vast majority of us are immigrants or descendants of immigrants,” Cohen said. “We feel an obligation as Jews who have experienced the blessings of welcome, and suffered the pain of rejection, to help new immigrants and those who are working to achieve documented status in our country.”

Wow. It is the Jewish duty to help illegal immigrants into America. But what about Israel? Is it the Jewish duty to help illegal Gentile immigrants to achieve legal status in Israel?

Posted in Immigration, Jews | Comments Off on Durbin, Cupich to discuss immigration reform at Temple Jeremiah

There can be no place in the immigration debate for xenophobia and the appeal to fear

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks writes:

As a Jew, I am always deeply grateful that when fleeing antisemitism in Poland my late father found refuge in Britain. Like so many other Jews in Britain, I know in my heart, in my very bones, that had it not been for this country, my parents and grandparents would not have lived and I would not have been born. My father had a Hebrew phrase for Britain; he called it a malkhut shel chessed, a “kingdom of kindness”, and indeed that it what it has been.
I will never forget the words of one of the members of our community who was rescued from Nazi Germany in 1939 by the operation known as Kindertransport. Many decades later, by now in her eighties, she spoke at the Memorial erected to commemorate that operation, outside Liverpool Street Station where the children had arrived. She spoke of her surprise and joy at discovering that in Britain a policeman was a friend, not an enemy! That is the mark of a kingdom of kindness.
At first, life for my father and other immigrants was hard. Poor, concentrated in ghettoes, barely able to speak English, they were caricatured as alien elements in British life. Jews who remember those days can readily sympathise with Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims today.
Yet what the Jewish experience taught was that whilst there were conflicts and a long struggle to define an identity that was both British and Jewish, these were pains of adjustment not permanent conditions. Today, our community thinks of itself as proudly British and Jewish. Integration and acceptance happened, but it did not happen overnight.
Today’s debate around immigration – is it a good thing, a bad thing or a good thing gone too far – is fraught and delicate. At its heart, however, should be a discussion beyond economic issues that addresses the fundamental questions of what defines British identity, what is loyalty to the nation, and what binds us in a bond of mutual responsibility as we work for the common good.
What previously held our society together and helped immigrants to integrate – a common language, a shared culture, a collective code of conduct – are now fragmented. The internet has added to the complexity, making it possible to physically live in one place but mentally somewhere else.
Recovering a sense of the common good requires steps from both sides. As a society, we need to have pride in our identity, our history and heritage and want newcomers to share it. On the other hand, those who come here from elsewhere would do well to heed the advice of the prophet Jeremiah to seek the “peace and prosperity” of the country. To be a blessing to your faith while being a blessing to others regardless of their faith is the best formula I know for creating a collective sense of identity and community.
Immigration will always be an important part of our political discourse, but we must remain vigilant in the way we frame the issues and the rhetoric we use to debate them. There is no place in the debate for prejudice, xenophobia, and the appeal to baser instincts of fear toward the stranger. The history of the twentieth century should remind us what can happen if we begin to blame this or that group for our misfortunes. Britain’s greatness is that it did not go down that road at a time when mainland Europe was rife with antisemitism. Nations that are confident of their own identity have no need for the politics of fear, and we should avoid it at all costs now and in the future.
We are living through an age of immense change, and change creates insecurities that are easily translatable into suspicion and hate. That is why it is so important that Britain remains a “kingdom of kindness” to those who seek refuge in its shores. Britain gave much to those who came here, and they gave much in return. There is a genuine debate to be had about immigration, but it must be conducted with wisdom, generosity and restraint.

The rabbi fails to mention Israel needing to swallow this poison chalice.

Posted in Immigration, R. Jonathan Sacks | Comments Off on There can be no place in the immigration debate for xenophobia and the appeal to fear

Rabbis push Congress on immigration reform

Report: “WASHINGTON (RNS) The call for action on immigration reform was issued just days before Sukkot, the Jewish harvest festival that commemorates the 40 years the Israelites wandered in the wilderness after their exodus from Egypt.”

Comments:

* These rabbis are soooo compasionate. Why then, do these rabbis support Israels deportation and FORCED birth contol of BLACK jews from Africans countries, also deportation of Palestinians?

* Israel has the strictest immigration laws in the world. Up to 17 years in prision, and deportation without trial.

Love is sending people down the path of righteousness; rewarding illegal/dishonest behavior is not love. Encouraging more illegal immigration with amnesty leads people to commit id theft, social security fraud, and perjury (i-9). By supporting amnesty the Rabbi’s are encouraging people to break Gods commandments.

* These rabbis are complete religious phonies and hypocrites. Israel would never let in hordes of 3 rd world peasant Mexicans because rabbi knows it would harm the state of Israel….why are rabbis patriotic for Israel, but not patriotic for the US?

* These good ole rabbis would never advocate massive numbers of poor people from Africa or Egypt or anywhere else; in fact these “compassionate” rabbis support deportation and forced sterilization of BLACK jews from Africa and poor people from anywhere else in the world, thats why I have to question their patriotism for the US…Again, these rabbi are hypocrites and phonies.

* The typical illegal is Mexican, illiterate,uneducated, and dirt poor since Mexico is a dirt poor country. Please read the latest reports from the Heritage Foundation. by Dr. Robert Rector which is the most comprehensive study thus far. You will find for every 11 million illegals given amnesty it will cost 6.3 trillion dollars, if 33 million get awarded,then cost is 19 trillion dollars. These illegals TAKE $3 in govt freebies for every $1 they earn. The average education is 3rd grade and they will depress wages for the American worker.

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on Rabbis push Congress on immigration reform

‘Join rabbis in advocating for fairer immigration laws’

Rabbi Andrew Straus of Temple Sinai in Oakland has a recipe for destroying America:

Although the Secure Communities program originally was intended to target undocumented immigrants who commit violent and serious crimes, it has become an indiscriminate mass deportation program. Seven out of 10 Californians deported last year either had no prior convictions, or prior convictions only for minor nonviolent offenses.

Furthermore, Secure Communities has created a climate of fear in the immigrant community and has adversely affected community policing efforts. Many undocumented immigrants, including victims of domestic violence, are hesitant to report crimes to law enforcement or contact authorities because they believe that contact with the police could result in separation from their families and deportation. Beyond the emotional and community costs, in 2012 California taxpayers spent $65 million to detain people for federal authorities.

Immigration is a Jewish issue. We have been the immigrant, the stranger, perhaps more than any other people in the history of humankind. We know what it means to be an outsider, dependent on others. The Torah reminds us over and over again: “When a stranger sojourns with you in your land, you shall not wrong him. The stranger who resides with you shall be to you as one of your citizens; you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt” (Leviticus 19:33–34). This commandment is repeated more than any other commandment.

Reform CA acted on this mitzvah by traveling to Sacramento to lobby for greater fairness in California’s immigration laws, and in particular to prevent families from being broken apart by unfair deportations. We advocated for the Senate to pass a robust and expansive TRUST Act and for the governor to sign it into law in a manner that will protect as many immigrants as possible.

Participating rabbis from the Bay Area included myself and Steven Chester of Temple Sinai; Larry Raphael and Julie Saxe-Taller of Congregation Sherith Israel; Ryan Bauer, Carla Fenves and Jonathan Jaffe of Congregation Emanu-El; Melanie Aron of Congregation Shir Hadash; and Andi Berlin of the Union for Reform Judaism, along with community members from the above congregations, as well as Beth Am and Shomrei Torah.

We urge you to join us to help make California a more just and compassionate state, as we work with our interfaith partners for passage of the TRUST Act.

Help protect our immigrant brothers and sisters from living their lives in fear of deportation today when tomorrow, they could be on the path to citizenship. To participate, go to http://www.RAC.org/ReformCA to send a letter to your state senator and Gov. Jerry Brown to tell them that you support the TRUST Act.

Posted in Immigration, Jews | Comments Off on ‘Join rabbis in advocating for fairer immigration laws’