The Nazi Tweets of ‘Trump God Emperor’

Jonathan Weisman writes in the New York Times:

THE first tweet arrived as cryptic code, a signal to the army of the “alt-right” that I barely knew existed: “Hello ((Weisman)).” @CyberTrump was responding to my recent tweet of an essay by Robert Kagan on the emergence of fascism in the United States.

“Care to explain?” I answered, intuiting that my last name in brackets denoted my Jewish faith.

“What, ho, the vaunted Ashkenazi intelligence, hahaha!” CyberTrump came back. “It’s a dog whistle, fool. Belling the cat for my fellow goyim.” With the cat belled, the horde was unleashed.

The anti-Semitic hate, much of it from self-identified Donald J. Trump supporters, hasn’t stopped since. Trump God Emperor sent me the Nazi iconography of the shiftless, hooknosed Jew. I was served an image of the gates of Auschwitz, the famous words “Arbeit Macht Frei” replaced without irony with “Machen Amerika Great.” Holocaust taunts, like a path of dollar bills leading into an oven, were followed by Holocaust denial. The Jew as leftist puppet master from @DonaldTrumpLA was joined by the Jew as conservative fifth columnist, orchestrating war for Israel. That one came from someone who tagged himself a proud future member of the Trump Deportation Squad.

The imaginings by my tormentors of me as an Orthodox Jew in wide-brimmed hat and Hasidic garb were, of course, laughable. The truth is, I have become largely disconnected from Jewish life and faith over the years, and like many American Jews I have been lulled into complacency. Our politics have dispersed between the parties. Our coreligionists grace our movie screens, lead the cities of Los Angeles and Chicago, help oversee the Senate Intelligence Committee, succeed without apology, but also struggle like everyone else.

A Jewish 17-year-old, inflamed by the Black Lives Matter movement and the cause of L.G.B.T. rights, told me recently there is no anti-Semitism, certainly nothing compared with the prejudices that afflict other minorities. I surprised myself when I recoiled from her words and argued passionately that Jews must never think anti-Semitism has been eradicated. I sounded like my mother.

Just weeks later, I found myself staring down a social-media timeline filled with the raw hate and anti-Semitic tropes that for centuries fueled expulsion, persecution, pogroms and finally genocide.

“I found the Menorah you were looking for,” one correspondent offered with a Trump-triumphant backdrop on his Twitter profile; it was a candelabrum made of the number six million. Old Grand Dad cheerfully offered up a patriotic image of Donald Trump in colonial garb holding up the Liberty Bell and fighting “against the foreign hordes,” with caricatures of the Jew, the American Indian, the Mexican, the Chinese and the Irish cowering at his feet.

I am not the first Jewish journalist to experience the onslaught. Julia Ioffe was served up on social media in concentration camp garb and worse after Trump supporters took umbrage with her profile of Melania Trump in GQ magazine. The would-be first lady later told an interviewer that Ms. Ioffe had provoked it. The anti-Semitic hate hurled at the conservative commentator Bethany Mandel prompted her to buy a gun.

Beyond journalism, stories of Muslims assaulted by Trump supporters are piling up. Hispanic immigrants are lining up for citizenship, eager to vote. Groups that have been maligned over centuries at different times in different regions now share a common tormentor, the alt-right, a militant agglomeration of white nationalists, racists, anti-Semites and America Firsters that have been waging war on the Republican establishment for some time. Their goals: Close the borders, deport illegal immigrants, pull out of international entanglements and pull up the drawbridge.

I retweeted the choicest attacks for all to see, and with each retweet, more attacks followed, their authors gleefully seeking the exposure. Some people criticized me for offering it, but I argued, perhaps wrongly, that such hate needed airing, that Americans needed to see the darkest currents in the politics of exclusion animating the presidential election.

An official at Twitter encouraged me to block the anti-Semites and report them to Twitter, but I have chosen to preserve my Twitter timeline as a research tool of sorts, a database of hate, and a shrine to 2016. The only response I blocked and forwarded to Twitter was a photo of my disembodied head held aloft, long Orthodox hair locks called payot photoshopped on my sideburns and a skullcap placed as a crown. I let stand the image of a smiling Mr. Trump in Nazi uniform flicking the switch on a gas chamber containing my Photoshopped face.

“Thanks to @jonathanweisman for redpilling at least 1.5k normies today by retweeting premium content. Epitome of useful idiot,” responded one tormentor whose Twitter handle is too vulgar to repeat, even if I wanted to. Maybe he was right.

And still, we have heard nothing from Mr. Trump, no denunciation, no broad renouncing of racist, anti-Semitic support, no expressions of sympathy for its victims. The Republican Jewish Coalition on Tuesday released what can only be described as equivocation as an art form: “We abhor any abuse of journalists, commentators and writers, whether it be from Sanders, Clinton or Trump supporters. There is no room for any of this in any campaign.”

I grew up in Atlanta in the 1970s, when friends spoke of “Jewing down” a price and anti-Semitism was casual, if not nearly as omnipresent as racial prejudice. My parents joined a synagogue that had been bombed by the Klan. My father opened his medical practice in Marietta, where Leo Frank was lynched in 1915 at the age of 31.

All of that seemed like buried history until now. In Mr. Trump, many in the alt-right have found an imperfect vessel for their cause, but they have poured their rage into his campaign without impediment. Mr. Trump apparently takes all comers.

We in the news business are taught to find and write up both sides of a story, with respect and equal time to all opinions. But that line is difficult to walk when one side is shoving you in the back.

Some thoughts.

* Yes, giving both sides of the story is such a staple of modern journalism.

* You approvingly retweet a link to an article saying that Donald Trump represents the rise of fascism in America but you expect no blowback. Right.

* I love how the author sticks his “Jewish faith” into the second paragraph only to later reveal he has no Jewish faith.

* Nothing in his story about anti-Gentile sentiments by Jews.

* Nothing about the routine denunciation in the MSM of white advocates.

* Perhaps there are groups with interests that are different from, and even hostile to, Jewish interests. Life is a battle for survival between competing groups.

* How much taunting do you expect white advocates to endure before they strike back?

* Every living thing has an instinctive response against those who threaten its survival. Those who want to destroy white cohesion should expect a blowback from people who want to preserve white peoplehood. Jews have peoplehood. Goyim have peoplehood.

* “Holocaust taunts, like a path of dollar bills leading into an oven, were followed by Holocaust denial.” Perhaps when organized Jewry makes the Holocaust its official religion and tries to impose that religion on America, perhaps the goyim tire of that. It was only when a section of organized Jewry sought to make the Holocaust the most significant event in human history that we got Holocaust denial and other gentile responses.

* There is no mitzvah in Torah to fight anti-Semitism or to make memorials about the Holocaust. These are preoccupations of secular Jews, those who are the least Jewish and therefore the most insecure in their identity. Torah Jews are busy with Torah. They don’t worry about goyim.

Posted in Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on The Nazi Tweets of ‘Trump God Emperor’

British man held over £500bn Wall Street ‘flash crash’

Man, it seems like every time I look, some British man is getting arrested for shenanigans on Wall Street.

Navinder_Singh_Sar_3276736b

The Telegraph: Lone trader Navinder Singh Sarao “significantly responsible” for causing the May 2010 market crash which saw the Dow Jones lose almost 1,000 points in a matter of minutes

A British man helped to trigger a £500bn US stock market crash by manipulating financial markets on a massive scale from a suburban London semi, US prosecutors have claimed.
Navinder Singh Sarao, 36, is accused of fraudulently making £27 million by using computer programmes to create fake trades on markets linked to the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.
US investigators say he was a major contributory factor to the so-called “Flash Crash” of May 6, 2010, when hundreds of billions of dollars was wiped off the value of the Dow Jones Industrial Average in just five minutes.
The US Department of Justice (DoJ) and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have simultaenously charged Navinder Singh Sarao with manipulating the financial markets, alleging he made more than $40m (£26.7m) from his activities over a period spanning more than five years.
Mr Sarao, who ran his own one-man day trading company, was arrested at his parents’ home in Hounslow, west London, on Tuesday at the request of American prosecutors.
He now faces extradition to the US after separate criminal and civil charges were filed against him for illegally manipulating the markets.
Neighbours of Mr Sarao in Hounslow, west London, said he was married with two children and lived quietly in a house opposite his parents’ home, where his company Nav Sarao Futures was registered.
His parents, Nachattar Singh Sarao and Darshaw Kaur Sarao, bought the house in 1982 and have lived there ever since. Apart from a well-maintained front garden with a brick wall around it, the pre-war semi is no different from any other in the street.
One neighbour said: “They are a quiet family, they say hello and goodbye, but that’s about it. The parents both work and their son lives opposite with his wife and two daughters. No-one has ever suggested they are wealthy.”

Posted in India, Wall Street | Comments Off on British man held over £500bn Wall Street ‘flash crash’

The Big Short: Film and Book

Different groups have different gifts and different interests and whenever one group rises in power, other groups necessarily decline in power. I am all for examining the different roles different groups play.

Steve Sailer, Tom Sowell and Paul Sperry have done great work on this topic. They don’t lay the GFC (Global Financial Crash of 2008) at the feet of the Jews.

I found the first season of the TV show Billions disappointing because there are no discernible Jewish characters, which is ridiculous for a TV show about wrongdoing on Wall Street. Whenever someone big gets arrested there, it seems like it is either a Jew or a south asian (Indian usually, such as Raj Rajaratnam or Nav Sarao).

Navinder_Singh_Sar_3276736b

Screen Shot 2013-04-04 at 1.40.48 AM

The majority of Jews since the 15th Century have made their living as white collar workers. With the average Ashkenazi IQ around 113, and with their people’s tradition of success in finance, it is to be expected that this group will dominate economics.

Jews and Judaism’s dual morality (one rules for behavior within the group, another more relaxed set of rules for behavior with outsiders) is the universal moral norm except among WASPs. Jews do best in individualist WASP countries. Compared to the good citizenship of WASPs, no other group comes close to their ethics. Jews consistently have more financial and sexual scandals than Anglicans, but who can argue that Jews have worse business ethics than the Chinese, Latin Americans, and other Mediterranean peoples.

Given the amount of suffering that Jews have had at the hands of non-Jews, many Jews feel no sympathy for the plight of the goyim.

Irwin Stelzer writes:

…The reporter seemingly did not know that the designation “white-shoe law firm” was invented to describe firms at the pinnacle of the WASP establishment, no Jews allowed, named apparently for the shoes these WASPs favored in the summer at their restricted country clubs.

In the 1960s, my partners and I were attempting to establish an economic consulting firm that marketed its services to law firms and public utilities. The “white-shoe” firms were off-limits. We identified them by adding up the Roman numerals after partners’ names—I, II, III, etc.—adding to that partners with first and last names that were interchangeable, and dividing by the total number of partners. A high result meant we had no chance.

Then there were cases in which no such arithmetic was needed. A partner in one firm told me at a cocktail party, after his usual consumption of truth-producing alcohol, that he was happy to be living in a New York suburb that did not allow Jews. That firm later merged with another; both went bust. Another pointed out that the new civil rights legislation wasn’t a problem for him because it did not protect Jews, whose upward drive would threaten him and his executives. The general counsel of a public utility invited me to lunch to congratulate me on starting the firm and added what he thought was encouraging news: “If we ever hire a firm with Jews, your firm will be the first.”

We were not the only disadvantaged group. One company CEO told me that he was certain new legislation did not force him to change a company rule that permitted men, but not women, to smoke at their desks. In the early 1960s, women were finding it difficult to procure professional positions, both in law firms and in the consulting field. Our firm took advantage of that market imperfection by hiring the best and the brightest women economics graduates, with emphasis on my mentor’s and my own former students at Cornell. When I was due to testify at an administrative proceeding at a Washington regulatory agency, I brought my assistant along to help check data, refresh my recollection during recesses, find sources, and perform other chores. The hearing officer quietly suggested to me that it was inappropriate to have a woman in the hearing room; I argued that she was entitled to see the fruits of her research and prevailed. It wasn’t easy.

Posted in Anti-Semitism, Jews, Wall Street | Comments Off on The Big Short: Film and Book

How Pepe the Frog Became a Nazi Trump Supporter and Alt-Right Symbol

From The Daily Beast:

4chan’s Pepe the Frog meme was wildly popular among ‘normies’—until white nationalists decorated him with swastikas and gave him a Trump button.

@JaredTSwift is an anonymous white nationalist who claims to be 19 years old and in school someplace on the West Coast. He told me there is “an actual campaign to reclaim Pepe from normies.”
Normies are basics—agreeable, mainstream members of society who have no knowingly abhorrent political views or unsavory hobbies. They are Katy Perry, and when they latch onto a meme, the meme dies the way your favorite band dies when it sells out and licenses a song to Chevrolet. When mainstream culture gets in on the joke, in other words, the joke is ruined forever.
The campaign to reclaim Pepe from normies was an effort to prevent this sort of death, but it also had the effect of desensitizing swaths of the Internet to racist, but mostly anti-Semitic, ideas supported by the so-called alt-right movement.
It began in late 2015 on /r9k/, a controversial 4chan board where, as on any message board, it can be difficult to discern how serious commenters are being or if they’re just fucking around entirely. Nevertheless, /r9k/ has been tied to Elliot Rodger—the UC Santa Barbara shooter who killed six people in 2014—who found fans there, and GamerGate. There, Pepe transformed from harmless cartoon to big green monster.
“We basically mixed Pepe in with Nazi propaganda, etc. We built that association,” @JaredTSwift said.

tumblr_inline_nr6p8f6d461rmka7g_540

tumblr_nsxkfeXazg1udwanoo1_540

Posted in Nazi | Comments Off on How Pepe the Frog Became a Nazi Trump Supporter and Alt-Right Symbol

The end of Baylor’s Art Briles

ESPN: “Art Briles has talked about his “nonjudgmental” program that wanted “mavericks” and prided itself on giving second chances. That attitude, mixed with indifference toward victims, did him in.”

How do you think he turned around Baylor’s football program? By scraping the bottom of the barrel of black thugs harder than other coaches (Steve Sailer).

Like most successful football coaches, Art Briles brought in black kids who have no business being on a college campus.

If you are going to have a lot of low-IQ, low impulse-control blacks on your campus, you are going to have to put up with a lot of rapes. But hey, it’s all worth it to have a great football team right?

Steve Sailer writes:

As I’ve been pointing out for years, a standard way an ambitious coach raises the success level of a college football or basketball program is to dare to scrape the bottom of the behavioral barrel harder than rival coaches when recruiting giant young males. A statistically likely side effect is that more coeds on your campus get raped, but boosters can pay the young ladies off.

And since most of the football and basketball player rapists are black and their victims tend to be white, nobody has really wanted to talk about what’s going on terribly explicitly. Black-on-white rape is a stereotype, right? So therefore it’s nothing to worry about.

It’s much more socially acceptable to make up stories about Haven Monahan and the Duke lacrosse team menace. Haven Monahan shattered stereotypes, just like he shattered glass, so we should notice him, not all the black basketball and football player rapists who actually exist.

Finally, however, a college has fired its highly successful $6 million per year football coach over this.

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Even Rush Limbaugh went there and mentioned race and black when talking about this, even though the official media articles don’t mention race.

You talk about how we outsource our patriotism to Israel, as something that needs to stop, and I agree. We also need to quit outsourcing our tribal energy to ball games played by 17-23 year old dindus.

* As someone really funny and insightful on Twitter put it – “the better the football program the less chance I’d send my daughter there”

* The UVa lacrosse coach is out. It could be because of his recent poor record or that one of his players murdered a UVa student. It probably is a combination. Having a lax player convicted of murder hurts recruiting and thus contributes to poor performance.

* Remember, it takes two to rape: one to rape and one to use poor judgement in being alone with the rapist.

ESPN: “But after a damning report from law firm Pepper Hamilton to the Board of Regents on May 13 that outlined a litany of sexual assaults and violent incidents involving players, Baylor fired the 60-year-old Briles on Thursday.”

sam

“Sam Ukwuachu, a transfer from Boise State, was convicted of sexually assaulting a Baylor soccer player.”

ESPN: August 20, 2015: Former Baylor defensive end Sam Ukwuachu is found guilty of sexually assaulting a former Baylor soccer player. He’s sentenced to 180 days in county jail and 10 years’ probation. He served more than two months before being released on Oct. 29 on a $100,000 appeal bond.

Aug. 21, 2015: Art Briles and Chris Petersen both issue statements regarding their conversations with each other during Ukwuachu’s transfer from Boise State to Baylor. During sentencing, an ex-girlfriend of Ukwuachu testifies that Ukwuachu assaulted her while he was at Boise State. Briles and Petersen both insist they were unaware of that allegation. Records obtained by ESPN indicate Boise State had serious concerns about Ukwuachu’s mental health at the time he was dismissed.

shawn

“Shawn Oakman, a top Baylor defensive player, was arrested in April on a sexual assault charge. A Waco police report later surfaces that he’d been accused of assaulting an ex-girlfriend in 2013.”

March 30: Jasmin Hernandez, a former Baylor student who reported she had been raped by Elliott, files a Title IX lawsuit against the school and officials including Briles. She claims the school knew Elliott had a history of assaults, failed to protect her and other women and ignored her when she sought help.

April 13: Oakman is arrested on a sexual assault charge. A Baylor graduate student alleges Oakman forced her to have sex with him after they met at a Waco nightclub on April 3. Oakman told police the sex was consensual.

April 14: Outside The Line reports that Baylor did not investigate sexual assault allegations made against Armstead and teammate Myke Chatman for more than two years. A Waco police report indicates it had informed Baylor officials of the off-campus incident when it occurred in April 2013. BU didn’t begin looking into the allegations until September 2015.

Posted in Academia, Blacks, Football | Comments Off on The end of Baylor’s Art Briles