Australian Muslim leader compares uncovered women to exposed meat

Comment: “I like the “raw meat” quote by the Muslim leader. It was not denounced by any of his fellow Muslims, men or women. They still revert him as their religious leader.

The Muslim religious leader is just saying what all good Muslims in Australia feel: gang-raping infidel whores is OK, or at least shouldn’t be punished as a crime.

In short, raping infidel whores will be ignored. No good Muslim will snitch on another nice Muslim boy (or man). They may not go out, groom and rape infidel whores themselves, but they will happily be the Muslim “sea” among whom the rapists freely swim (to paraphrase Mao).”

* “When the State is your sugar daddy, you don’t need to suffer a boring relationship with a boring guy with a boring white collar job. You can have a fling with that 50 Cent wannabe with no repercussions!”

From The Guardian:

A senior Muslim cleric in Australia has sparked a furore by comparing women who do not wear a headscarf to “uncovered meat”, implying that they invited sexual assault.
Sheik Taj Aldin al-Hilali delivered his comments in a religious address on adultery to around 500 worshippers in Sydney last month, but they only came to the attention of the wider public when they were published in the Australian paper today.

Sheik Hilali was quoted as saying: “If you take out uncovered meat and place it outside … without cover, and the cats come to eat it … whose fault is it, the cats’ or the uncovered meat’s? The uncovered meat is the problem. If she was in her room, in her home, in her hijab [the headdress worn by some Muslim women], no problem would have occurred.”

The Egyptian-born cleric, the mufti of Sydney’s biggest mosque, today sought to defuse the outrage his comments had sparked, including among fellow Muslims.

Sheik Hilali said in a statement he was shocked by reaction to his sermon.

“I would like to unequivocally confirm that the presentation related to religious teachings on modesty and not to go to extremes in enticements. This does not condone rape. I condemn rape,” he said. “Women in our Australian society have the freedom and right to dress as they choose; the duty of man is to avert his glance or walk away.”

But Muslim community leaders rounded on Sheik Hilali for his comments, insisting that he no longer deserved his title as Australia’s mufti.

The country’s most prominent female Muslim leader, Aziza Abdel-Halim, said the hijab did not “detract or add to a person’s moral standards”, while an Islamic Council of Victoria spokesman, Waleed Ali, said it was “ignorant and naive” for anyone to believe that a hijab could stop sexual assault. “Anyone who is foolish enough to believe that there is a relationship between rape or unwelcome sexual interference and the failure to wear a hijab, clearly has no understanding of the nature of sexual crime,” he told the Australian.

The paper also reported that Sheik Hilali alluded in his sermon to the gang rapes in Sydney of six years ago, suggesting the attackers were not entirely to blame.

While not specifically referring to the attacks on four women, for which a group of young Lebanese men received long jail sentences, Sheik Hilali said there were women who “sway suggestively” and wore make up and immodest dress … “and then you get a judge without mercy [rahma] and he gives you 65 years… but the problem all began with who?”

Sheik Hilali, the top cleric at Sydney’s largest mosque, is considered the most senior Islamic leader by many Muslims in Australia and New Zealand.

He has served as an adviser to the Australian government on Muslim issues, but has attracted controversy before. In 2004 he was criticised for saying, in a sermon in Lebanon, that the September 11 attacks were “God’s work against the oppressors”.

The uproar after Sheik Hilali’s comments threatens to further inflame relations between Australia’s 300,000 Muslims and the rest of the population, after riots in Sydney last December that pitted white gangs against youths of Middle Eastern descent, many of whom were Muslim.

Posted in Australia, Islam, Rape | Comments Off on Australian Muslim leader compares uncovered women to exposed meat

The Ashfield Gang Rapes

From Wikipedia:

* The Ashfield gang rapes was a series of attacks involving indecent assault and rape of possibly as many as eighteen teenaged women of varying ethnic backgrounds which were carried out in Ashfield, New South Wales, Australia in late 2001 and over a six-month period in 2002.[1] Four Pakistani brothers and a Nepali student were convicted and imprisoned for the rapes.

The Khan brothers were referred to in court reports by their initials only, as two of the brothers were 16 and 17 at the time of the crimes.[3] The fifth rapist, Ram Shrestha, was a Nepalese immigrant and friend of the “K” brothers. As of July 2005, MSK was 26 years old, MAK, 25, MRK, 20, MMK, 19, and Shrestha, also referred to merely with his initials, was 25.[4]

The K brothers are sons of a Sydney general practitioner, Dr Hasan K, of Pakistani origin. The eldest, MSK, was married with a six-year-old son as of 2005.[4] They had grown up in Pakistan and had been brought to Sydney in 2000 by their father, who provided them with a house in Ashfield. He unsuccessfully attempted in court to provide an alibi for his sons, and was facing perjury charges at the time of his death in November 2006.[3]

At the time of the trial three of the K brothers were already serving a prison sentence for a previous rape. Defendant MSK divulged this information, which had been kept from the jury to prevent them from being biased against the defendants, in open court in a supposed attempt to have the trial aborted.

Posted in Australia, Islam, Rape | Comments Off on The Ashfield Gang Rapes

The Sydney Gang Rapes

From Wikipedia:

The Sydney gang rapes were a series of gang rape attacks committed by a group of up to fourteen Lebanese Australian youths led by Bilal Skaf against Australian women and teenage girls, as young as 14, in Sydney Australia in 2000. The crimes, described as ethnically motivated hate crimes by officials and commentators,[1][2][3] were covered extensively by the news media, and prompted the passing of new laws. The nine men convicted of the gang rapes were sentenced to a total of more than 240 years in jail. According to court transcripts Judge Michael Finnane described the rapes as events that “you hear about or read about only in the context of wartime atrocities”.

* Attackers offered a ride and a portion of cannabis to two teenage girls aged 17 and 18. The women were taken by the attackers to Northcote Park, Greenacre where more collaborators were waiting. The women were then forced to fellate eight males.

* A 16-year-old girl was brought to Gosling Park, Greenacre by someone whom she believed was her friend, 17-year-old Mohammed Skaf. At the park she was raped by Mohammed’s brother Bilal Skaf and one other man, with twelve other men present who she said were “standing around, laughing and talking in their own language”.[6] The second man held a gun to her head and kicked her in the stomach before she was able to escape.

* Another woman was approached by attackers at the Bankstown railway station, who proposed she join them in smoking some cannabis at another location. She agreed and went with them; however she was taken to three separate locations by the men and raped 25 times by a total of fourteen men in an ordeal that lasted six hours. After the attacks the woman was hosed down with a fire hose. The woman, who was known during the trial as ‘C’ to protect her identity, later told her story to 60 Minutes. She told of how the attackers called her an “Aussie Pig”, asked her if “Leb cock tasted better than Aussie cock” and explained to her that she would now be raped “Leb-style”.

* Two girls, both 16, were taken by the attackers from Beverly Hills railway station to a house in another suburb, where three men repeatedly raped them over a period of five hours. One of the victims was told that “You deserve it because you’re an Australian”.

* The attackers used SMS and mobile phones to orchestrate the attack and to phone ahead to other attackers to co-ordinate transport of rape gang members to the locations where women were being held. Authorities later released some of this material, recovered from the rapists’ mobile phones

The attackers texted such messages as “When you are feeling down… bash a Christian or Catholic and lift up”.[33] and “I’ve got a slut with me bro, come to Punchbowl”.

Posted in Arabs, Australia, Islam, Rape | Comments Off on The Sydney Gang Rapes

How Do You Stop Rape Culture?

Comments:

* The irony here is that it is the very racial homogeneity that people here love so much that is causing the inability to speak of the large scale sexual assaults committed by Muslims.

Hans Christian Andersen (the Dane who wrote the individualistic ‘The Emperor’s New Clothes’ and ‘The Ugly Duckling’) understood this aspect of Scandinavian life well back in the 19th century, namely that group agreement trumps anything else including reality.

And since Scandinavian group agreement (as decided decades ago by the various SoDem governments and institutions) includes ‘anti-racism’, that’s that.

The Swedish Democrats and similar groups will not win, unless and until native Scandinavians lose their homogeneity.

* Nobody is willing, anymore, to put in the kind of effort and sacrifice that’s required to maintain a woman-friendly safe, clean, orderly society. Not only to put in that kind of effort, but to put in that kind of effort in the face of white women spitting in your face for your trouble.

It’s time to give white women what they’ve been demanding for so long – break down the “patriarchy” and renounce the bad-old ways. Let them stay inside after dark because they can’t walk down the street without getting dragged into an alley by the orcs they’re demanding be imported into formerly clean, safe (but racist!) white societies.

* Isn’t it strange though that all these young Syria and MENA men who are going to become engineers and scientists and quick study service workers allegedly need to be told – v.e.r.y. s.l.o.w.l.y. – that dragged a local girl into the bushes, tearing her clothes, punching her and raping her is wrong?

* This has nothing to do with education or culture. This comes down to 2 traits.

1. Sociopathy. Muslims are, on average, much more sociopathic than Northern Euro whites.
2. Sexual frustration. Muslims are, on average, much more sexually frustrated than Northern Euro whites (due to sexual constraints with their own unmarried women).

No amount of education or instruction will change the above traits. Perhaps assimilation might, but there’s no evidence of Muslims assimilating to Euro cultures.

In Muslim nations, rape is uncommon because male relatives keep tight control over their females. Also, because if you did rape a female from one family, their entire clan would visit violence on you and your clan.

* Bringing a lot of sexually frustrated Muslim men into sexually liberal Western countries is crazy. It’s like bringing a hungry man into a grocery store, then getting shocked when he starts stealing food.

* Occam’s Razor instead of Butterknife says that instead of Extreme Guilt cultures, which I haven’t seen much evidence of in Europe or here, the motivating factor is the HATE HATE HATE of White women for White beta males (90% of White men) who don’t know their place and get all uppity.

Somewhat related, the FT this weekend had the “Lunch with the FT” series featuring Jeremy Clarkson. The interviewer stated that before the lunch he mentioned his appointment to otherwise sensible and calm female BBC producers and they went ballistic with rage. Spitting Cobra were the words he used IIRC. The interviewer found Clarkson merely a softer version of the person he appears on TV, funny, but really does wear the old jeans and shabby jackets he shows up on camera with; and bloke-ish. Which translates to a semi-beta male who is uppity and does not know his place.

Rather than say, the 22,000 Jews in Sweden being responsible for Multiculturalism, Occam’s Razor suggests that is the half the Swedish population that is female and is fed up with beta male-ism among their male peers at work.

Not mentioning Third World colonizers propensity for violence against women is merely a society-wide aspect of women making excuses and ignoring violence against them by their thug partners. It is the same female behavior, over and over again. No, of course its Haven Monaghan who is the bad guy, and not Tyrone the Basketball player or Hassan from Morocco. Haven is just the proxy for that nervous, nerdy nice guy who awkwardly asked a woman out for coffee despite having the original sin of being nervous, not famous, not handsome, and not extremely dominant. By contrast, both Tyrone and Hassan treat women like disposable objects and White women particularly can’t get enough of that dominance, since they are treated entirely too nicely by their supplicating male counterparts.

This suggests that this excuse making by White women will go away very rapidly if White men just up their Game. Be more assertive, more dominant, treat women more cavalierly and do whatever they can to gain more status over their female peers.

As a White man here are my objections to Muslims and why I HATE HATE HATE THEM and want them all to go back to Muslim countries:

1. Muslims aggressively Muslimize my society, and create the No-Fun League. Muslims forbid alcohol, pork, dogs, uncovered, unveiled women, dress in ugly, third world clothing designed to mark me as an outsider easily preyed upon, and in all ways aggressively colonize my First World Society with Third World trash and failure.

2. Muslims bring nothing good with them — no math, no science, Clockboy Ahmed merely took apart a clock and pranced around with it pretending it was a bomb to get the Muslim lottery — a lawsuit. Tell me again what Muslims created in the 500 years that swept the globe, apart from IEDs and Suicide Bombers? No one goes to Muslim countries for anything but sucking up oil money — the places are Third World hellholes of misery, violence, and corruption. By contrast even a place like Denmark has nice places to see — the Tivoli Gardens, the Little Mermaid, etc.

3. Muslims aside from rape, which they do in abundant and massive numbers compared to Whites, are surly, obnoxious, demanding, ugly, and violent. Muslim women are renowned for their ugliness, in both physical and spiritual dimensions. Muslim men are known for cruelty and brutality, not inventiveness or creation of beauty. Japanese men perpetrated horrors previously unknown in scale: the rape of Nanking and Manila, an orgy of brutality and murder and rape. They also create exquisite things of beauty, from handmade paper umbrellas to ceremonial tea sets and delicious food. There are Japanese film series from Godzilla to gentle comedies that appeal to people the world over, as well as detective novelists and the like. Even Korea has given the world K-Pop. Muslims can’t even do that, let alone create a Sony or a Samsung.

In short, I find Muslims fairly unique among Humanity, having no good points whatsoever, and nothing but bad ones. I have no desire to rule among them, or have anything to do with them really. Now that the US has fracking capacity, I say let Muslims slaughter each other to their hearts content, and lets all kick them out — the US and the West will be better for it.

Why would I want to pay for some old Sudanese man? He’s not my responsibility, let Sudan pay for him. The same with Somalis. I don’t like, respect, or have any interest in Muslims, other than sending them all away, far away, where they can create their own past-times of beheading, burning people alive, and the like.

Posted in Islam, Rape | Comments Off on How Do You Stop Rape Culture?

Do Trump & Adelson Have A Deal?

Steve Sailer writes:

Adelson, like Trump, is a casino-owner.

Trump may be saying something like this to Adelson:

– We both have a financial interest in cracking down on online gambling in favor of making people go to specific places to gamble.

– Your wife is Israeli, so you are really into Israel. I’ll be ardent for Israel too.

– Tightening up on Israel is my thing, like Israel is your’s. It will cost me and you some higher wages, but we can afford it. So let’s trade.

* Trump can get more bang for his money by donating to alt-right webzines and bloggers like Steve Sailer than any other way. Even if they don’t support him 100%, you can be sure that they’ll heap scorn and ridicule upon other candidates.

You can’t win without modern media outlets and social media. Isn’t that how Obama kicked Hillary to the curb eight years ago?

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Do Trump & Adelson Have A Deal?

Are You Scared?

Comments:

* Seems in tandem with the media’s effort to dislodge Trump is an effort to convince everyone that dissenting from the left’s agenda is nothing more than being childish–namely, being irrationally “fearful” and “anxious”.

There is no shortage of examples of this. From a headline in today’s NY Times: “As Obama Checks Off List of Goals Met, a Nervous Nation Dwells on Terror”

Recent op-ed from the WaPo: “Obama is a rationalist president in the age of anxiety”

Etc.

I guess the endless stream of hysterical ad hominem smears wasn’t demonstrating the cudgeling effect it has long had, so now they’re moving onto the tried-and-true “pathologize your dissidents” strategy.

* It seems to me the WSJ is nudging or directing the anti-Trumpers to quit attacking Trump on being “shocking” and “loudmouthed” and “racist” because it’s not working and only making him stronger.

Instead, they’re telling the MSM to hit him in the pocketbook.

Except that the Univision-crowd tried this already and failed (cancelling contracts, bookings, refusing his beauty pageant). It would take a mega-concerted effort to really hit Trump hard in the pocketbook, and that would bring out lawsuits galore from Trump against them.

Italy’s Silvio Berlusconi is the public figure that most resembles Trump: shameless, right of center for his country, younger women (one at 18 while he’s in his 70s), oodles of bombastic charm, smirks, billionaire, sharply dressed, telegenic. He’s won the Italian leadership several times, off and on. The major difference is Silvio owns his own media-TV channels there, which gives him his own platform. Trump is running against even the right-wing (Fox) network’s open-borders viewpoint. Trump has countered this by being so outrageous that he’s gotten free air time.

* Adelson in Trump’s corner, or at least not opposing Trump, is a devastating blow to the establishment Republicans.

* What Trump did with Ali G is reframe and dominate multiple times during the conversation which through AG completely off his own script. AG became the mewling supplicant begging Trump not to run with Trump’s own off-the-cuff ice cream innovation.

Look at Ali’s facial expressions. Body language. Ali looks like a general watching his troops get routed.

The clip is on YouTube. The tone is set immediately when Trump responds to the first question with “music.” Right there all of the humor goes out of Ali GM’s act because he’s forced to scramble and somehow make his script work, but it can’t work because Trump keeps blowing up the script’s premise.

* As for Obama’s IQ, he can’t talk extemporaneously without coming off as a stutterer and ignoramus. Hence the reason that all questions to Obama must be submitted beforehand. His Harvard grades are sealed, so I suspect he another AA graduate. His early political career shows a man totally indifferent to everything.

Trump connects with people for a reason. He brings up the issues that the other oligarchic puppets won’t. This allows him to bypass the media and political experts. Yes he’s brusque but it’s not something the average working person isn’t used to.

BTW a smart man can talk to the masses, you just don’t condescend or play mind games. You simply speak the truth in a straightforward manner. Trump does.

The reason why your so-called brainiacs can’t talk to them is because they are all liars and frauds. They don’t dare to tell the American people that their policies will result in further mass economic rapes, the obliteration of the middle-class and later the demise of the country.

* If Trump tried to implement all of the policies that most people here favor, society would go into cardiac arrest on the operating table. Considering that NO ONE ELSE is proposing ANY of what Trump has advocated, the nation would be blessed if he followed through on even one policy position. What’s the alternative?

* I’m a Trump fan. I’ve been listening to the “Perot 2.0″ arguments, the prearranged deal with Bill arguments. Trump is eating all the sacred cows. Show him one, he sees a tasty hamburger. Yes, yes, yes you can drag out your American fascist accusations, you can throw around your buffoon and your clown charges. I’m reminded of Captain Renault from “Casablanca.”

Major Strasser: You give him credit for too much cleverness. My impression was that he’s just another blundering American.
Captain Renault: We musn’t underestimate “American blundering”. I was with them when they “blundered” into Berlin in 1918.

Just look at how much the establishment hates him, when he says things like “The question is, do we have a country or not?” That’s gold, and they hate it. “Israel has a wall.” Like vampires to sunlight, that’s how they react. “Yeah let Putin get ISIS in Syria. Good for him.” Aiiiiiieeeeeee!

Where does the ride go? Who knows.

But some of the things we’ve been worrying about and obsessing about for years are all of a sudden a part of the conversation, even if it’s an awkward part. Walls, borders, national identity, “I met with Sheldon Adelson but I don’t want his money.” Look, I was a Ron Paul man from way back, from back in the early 1980s with the whole newsletter thing. I’m proud of what Ron Paul did, both in his time in the government, and in his run for the presidency. Trump has already introduced concepts, tropes, ideas, that Ron Paul somehow couldn’t get into the discussion.

And if Trump stabs us in the back? If he turns out to be a for real and for true no shit American Hitler? Well, he’ll have broken the artificial stagnant pool of water that is American politics. That cannot have been an intended consequence of any false flag or deal with Billy operation.

* The greatest US Presidents share one thing in common: They were all leaders and pretty much individuals. Their force of personality, charisma, call it what you will, is the main thing that held together the various groups and factions from splintering apart.

It’s the Commander in Chief, not the leading by committee. Leading, is after all, a one man role. So it has been throughout history and so it shall ever be. Throughout his adult life in the private sector Trump has been an individual leader, but at the same time he has also shown abilities to persuade and build coalitions in order to achieve his largest goals. He knows well how to build a group for the larger goal at hand. How this will translate to the public sector is anyone’s guess but so long as he stays on message and focuses on being a leader and the individual aspects of being the Commander in Chief, the individual role of the presidency, (which would tend to play to his instincts and strengths) he should do pretty well. Behind the scenes of course he will choose certain lieutenants to help implement his policies. He can always hire the “right people” to sort out all the various details, whether its an H-1B; Triad; etc. The details come and go; the larger goal/big picture remains the same and in that sense, Donald Trump could be the right man to get the job done. The big question of course is whether or not the GOP leaders at large will be satisfied with the lieutenants that are chosen to implement his policies.

Remember: Ronald Reagan, like Trump, did not obsessively focus on details. He focused on the big picture and achieved many of them during his two administrations.

* A Trump admin focused on restricting immigration and balancing trade to create more jobs in the US would find a lot supporters in economically depressed parts of the country. Bear in mind that those supporters need not necessarily be Republicans. It may be that Trump causes a realignment, where the remaining nationalist Dems come over to the GOP, and some of the globalist GOPs switch to the Dems. In other words. the Dems remain a high-low coalition, but the GOP gets a bigger chunk of the middle while losing some of its own top layer.

Posted in America, Donald Trump | Comments Off on Are You Scared?

Israel Belongs To The White Man?

Mondoweiss: The roundup is part of a larger policy to deport all of Israel’s asylum seekers, drafted by Interior Minister Eli Yishai who said earlier this month that Israel is for “the white man.” Speaking to Maariv on June 3, 2012 the minister said: “Muslims that arrive here do not even believe this country belongs to us, to the white man,” continuing that he is prepared to use “all the tools to expel the foreigners, until not one infiltrator remains.”

Posted in Israel | Comments Off on Israel Belongs To The White Man?

If It Wasn’t For Hitler…

Comments:

* If it wasn’t for Hitler, we could have an honest, science-based discussion on this topic.

* The Nazis killed eugenics, any sort of moderate racial loyalty or realism, any investigation of racial differences, German national pride, and fifty other things others here could fill in.

* If Adolf were positioned in the center, the only place he belongs, then a shift to the “far” right would be moving away from him. But progressives control the history “profession”, there and here, so what can you do?

Posted in Adolf Hitler | Comments Off on If It Wasn’t For Hitler…

‘Stoic’ driver identified in Las Vegas Strip horror

From USA Today:

The woman accused of deliberately driving onto a packed sidewalk along the famed Las Vegas Strip was “stoic” after the tragedy, telling a parking attendant what she had done and asking him to call 911, authorities said Monday.

lakeisha

“Those blonde highlights make all the difference.” (Chaim Amalek)

Lakeisha Holloway, 24, will be charged with murder with a deadly weapon and other charges related to the incident Sunday evening that left one person dead and dozens injured. District Attorney Steven Wolfson, who said formal charges would be filed late Monday or Tuesday, added that it was too early to determine whether the death penalty could or would be sought.

“The videos obviously show intention,” Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo said at a Monday press conference. But he reiterated that there was no indication the case involved terrorism.

Lombardo put the number of injured at 35 and said three people remained in critical condition. The Clark County Coroner’s Office identified the person killed as Jessica Valenzuela, 32, of Buckeye, Ariz.

The tragedy unfolded on Las Vegas Boulevard, steps away from the Planet Hollywood resort where the 2015 Miss Universe pageant was crowning a winner before a live audience and TV audiences around the world. Lombardo said video from bystanders and businesses shows the car roaring onto the sidewalk at least twice, smashing into panicked pedestrians. Some fought back, jumping on the car and pounding on it in an effort to make her stop, Lombardo said.

Posted in Blacks, Crime | Comments Off on ‘Stoic’ driver identified in Las Vegas Strip horror

The Demon Mom Of The Year

ellenF

Ellen Friedrichs: “Health educator, mom, editor of @aboutdotcom’s LGBT teens site and contributing writer for @Evrydayfeminism, Canadian.”

From the Chateau:

Jonathan Haidt wrote about disgust occupying a dimension of human morality. He found, (unsurprisingly if you’ve trawled the internet for five minutes), that leftoids have a higher disgust threshold than non-leftoids. (That is, they can more happily tolerate disgusting things in their lives.)

I bring this up because a world in which disgust is abandoned as a moral consideration starts quickly filling up with people like the demon mom this post will introduce to you. A society recklessly surrendering even the pretense of monitoring culture health for signs of encroaching trends that elicit the disgust reflex is a society that will in short order be overrun by disgusting people and the disgusting things they do.

Every year, I give presentations about my health classes to the parents of my students. And inevitably, every year, someone will express relief at the idea that I’ll be talking to their kids about sex so that they’ll be spared the awkwardness of doing so themselves.

Numbnuts Class Hivemind Indoctrination incoming!

This reminds me: leftoids always attack. They never relent in their desire to strip the good from the world and replace it with their island of misfit degenerates. The only effective counterattack is to not play the game by their rules. Go on the attack and put THEM in the defensive crouch. Abide YOUR frame, not theirs.

At this point, I almost expect that. After all, for a lot of people, talking about sex with their kids is awkward. As my friend May said of having such conversations with her three- and eight-year-olds, “Their dad and I are nervous about it in general, so I know we’re putting it off.”

You know, there’s a good reason Nature designed it so that talking about sex with your three-year-old feels awkward: because it IS awkward and you shouldn’t be doing it.

Plus, a lot of parents didn’t talk about sex with adults when they were growing up, and so don’t have a model of how to do so.

Amazing the human race managed to survive this long without sex-ed classes for toddlers.

But talking openly to your kids is one of the best ways to raise them with a positive view of sexuality

When a shitlib feminist uses the word “positive” with regards to sex, she means “as often as humanly possible, with a black man, involving depraved acts and rectally-inserted objects, but only after verbal consent is established incrementally on the minute, every minute.”

– and to challenge the conventional and damaging messages so many are getting on the subject.

Like how not to spend the day with a vibrating buttplug slipping dangerously close to irretrievability?

For example, do you want your kids to have accurate information about how their bodies work and to feel good in their skin?

Buffalo Bill here reminding you that it’s possible to feel good in another person’s skin.

Whatever your wishes, having a sense of them will go a long way in helping your children navigate these waters in a manner that feels true to your family.

Female poopytalk. Thank you, women’s studies degree programs! (mo’ money for dem…)

Yet separating sex from reproduction can be hard to do. That’s because then you need to talk about desire, and pleasure, and as I did recently with my nine-year-old,

😯

things like oral sex. (“Eeeew,” she groaned after I gave a basic description, “That is so gross. What if someone didn’t wipe!?”)

Smart kid. Dumb parent. Mix the two: child abuse.

But kids find a lot of things kind of gross and aren’t traumatized.

Like steaming dog shit. So the answer is to shove buckets of steaming dog shit in kids’ faces, naturally.

And explaining that many people have sex not to have babies, but because it feels nice and can forge intimacy and connection, isn’t actually all that hard to say.

Grooming your White child for that sweet, sweet 0.7 below-replacement fertility rate.

2. Start Conversations About Consent Early

Feminist cunt mom is about to unload some Holy Matriarchy injunctions on her kid.

When addressing consent with young kids, you can teach them that they need to get permission to touch others by asking peers and siblings things like “Can I hug you?” or “Can I hold your hand?”

Or, “How to turn your emotionally healthy child into a creepy, psychologically unstable, socially clumsy spergatron.”

Children should also have their physical boundaries respected by adults.

But not their psychological boundaries.

Adults often think it is perfectly fine to continue to tickle or wrestle a child who is asking them to stop. But it isn’t – and it teaches kids that they don’t really have control over their bodies.

This psychobitch sounds like a lot of fun to be around.

Kids should also be allowed to change their minds. They shouldn’t, for instance, be taught that keeping a promise is always the most moral thing to do.

Shitlibs train their sprog early in the art of traitorous status whoring.

With older kids, explain that consent for sex can be withdrawn at any time. […] Plus, kids and teens should know that you can stop a sexual interaction at any time, even if both people are naked and fooling around. Even in the middle of a sex act.

Nothing says “this is completely natural and loving” like teaching your daughter to demand consent after every thrust into her vagina, and your son to be ready to stop right up to, and including, the point of imminent ejaculation. Just another feminist whackjob demonstrating a clear lack of understanding and empathy for physical and emotional differences between the sexes (and between children and adults).

Posted in Feminism | Comments Off on The Demon Mom Of The Year