March 31, 2016 Political Scientist: Trump Is A ‘Wrecking Ball’ Against The Conservative Establishment Luke Ford No sacred cows.

Political Scientist: Trump Is A ‘Wrecking Ball’ Against The Conservative Establishment

Posted on March 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

Daily Caller: George Hawley, a professor of political science at the University of Alabama and author of the new book “Right-Wing Critics of American Conservatism,” talked with The Daily Caller this week about the Trump phenomenon and how it is affecting the conservative movement.

“The conservative movement would be in serious decline even if Trump had stayed out of this race,” Hawley told TheDC. “The movement simply does not know what to do in a world where big business is allied with the cultural left, secularism is on the rise, changing demographics are weakening the GOP’s base of support, there is no evidence that regime change and democracy are panaceas for terrorism, and we have economic problems that won’t be solved with another tax cut.”

In his opinion, Trump’s candidacy has merely exposed the already-present weaknesses of the conservative establishment, particularly GOP voters’ lack of concern for its continued health.

“All the major figures of the conservative intelligentsia denounced Trump and the public responded to their critiques with indifference. This demonstrated that huge numbers of voters, even those who regularly vote Republican, simply do not care about the conservative movement. Trump showed the world that the conservative movement is a Potemkin village. Or to switch metaphors, it is an army with many well-compensated officers, but very few grunts,” Hawley said.

…That ideological vacuum could be filled by a number options, according to Hawley’s estimation.

“Some will try to reassert the old conservatism, or a more progressive variation of the old conservatism. Others will push for a libertarian approach. Some will openly embrace some kind of white identity politics,” he remarked.

Posted in Conservatives, Donald Trump | Comments Off

Black Mom Hires Stripper For Her 8yo Son’s Birthday Party

Posted on March 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

New York Post: This kid’s birthday bash looked more like a bachelor party.

Grainy YouTube video shows a stripper shaking her booty for a boy celebrating his eighth birthday.

One youngster is seen smacking the dancer’s backside, and another makes it rain dollar bills, during the age-inappropriate bash in Tampa, Fla.

Tampa cops received calls about the video last week, but cops didn’t act because nothing in the footage conclusively shows when and where the X-rated party happened, a department spokeswoman told The Post.

Reps for the nearby Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Department said they were not aware of the footage.

Critics blasted the twerk-fest as child abuse, the Daily Star reported.

“The mother should be put in jail and the stripper should be fined,” one disgusted video viewer said. “Disgusting.”

Posted in Sex | Comments Off

Donald Trump Took Pro-Life Seriously

Posted on March 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

If you take the pro-life position seriously, you have to be for punishing women who get abortions. If you don’t want to punish them, then your “pro-life” position is only a scam.

Women who have abortions (unless they were raped) aren’t victims.

Richard Spencer: “We don’t take women seriously as rational independent actors. Women are always victims. They’re little delicate flowers that we have to care for.”

“Donald Trump has made fun of hundreds of men… But it is not a big deal. It is only if you criticize a woman, call her a pig, that that’s terrible. Mainstream feminism wants women to have equal rights but at the same time treat them like delicate flowers.”

“In any non-insane society, we would have double standards… Men should be treated differently than women. White people should be treated differently than black people. People of high character should be treated differently than people of low character. People who are leaders in society should be viewed by a different standard than people in the lower levels of society.”

Posted in Abortion, Feminism | Comments Off

Black Countries, Counties, Cities Can’t Maintain Infrastructure

Posted on March 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments: In DC, management of Metro, DC’s subway system, is considering shutting down sections of the system or even the entire system for 6 months to conduct maintenance.

The fact that a major system is facing such monumental maintenance issues is stunning. However when you discover the hiring culture of Metro it all makes sense. It’s been a job program for blacks for years. So Steve while I do agree in the main that affirmative action should be targeted, it should not be used in critical areas.

* Is the DC Metro becoming a form of Atlanta’s MARTA: Moving Africans Rapidly Through Atlanta? Pity that the system isn’t working; it was a good system when I was there between 1985 and 2004.

* I’m against affirmative action in any form. I am for every individual being treated fairly. AA is just another form of prejudicial treatment – this time directed against whites. Two blacks don’t make a white. It is not possible to make up for past transgressions by penalizing the present. Such actions simply create another class of aggrieved people who feel slighted by their government and/or officials.

* I think the libertarian objective of doing away with all anti-discrimination laws, whatever its intellectual merits, is politically unattainable in the short to medium term.

However, narrowing and targeting diversity laws to reflect “actual historic oppression” cuts back on those laws, and leads to some interesting debates with the Democratic demographics. Also, if we could change the scope, perhaps making them all applicable to business with 50 or 75 employees or more, it would take a huge level of red tape off the back of small businesses everywhere. If there is going to be red tape for small business, it ought to be in connection with a new national e-verify system.

From a GOP perspective, it would allow the GOP to set up a multiracial/ethnic coalition by targeting certain minority groups. I don’t see why there isn’t support on the populist side of the GOP for affirmative action for Blacks, because if you could make Black voters comfortable with the GOP, I don’t think they would care about immigration restrictions or lack of comparable favoritism for Hispanics (intersectionality being what it is).

You have to wonder where the Democratic party would be without being able to take out their White Racist Redneck Kachina Dolls every election cycle to frighten the children into compliance.

* It’s ironic that you choose Feynman as the poster boy for “competent white man”. When Feynman was applying to grad school at Princeton, a Princeton physics professor wrote to a colleague at MIT, ” Is Feynman Jewish? We have no definite rule against Jews but have to keep their proportion in our department reasonably small because of the difficulty of placing them.” MIT wrote back that he was in fact Jewish but that Feynman’s “physiognomy and manner, however, show no trace of this characteristic and I do not believe the matter will be any great handicap.”

* Determining who gets “reparations” based on past events cannot result in anything but a regression ad absurdam. Thomas Jefferson addressed the question of slavery in Notes on the State of Virginia and the original draft of the Declaration of Independence, and he argued that the British were to blame for slavery. He was right — slavery had been in existence in the colonies for 150 years before American independence. And it was the fault of not only the British, but the Dutch, Portugese, Spaniards, and French as well. Should they all pay reparations to blacks?

As far as the Indians were concerned, the U.S. government treated them as foreign nations, and concluded treaties with the tribes willing to do so. That was the situation until the 1920s, when Congress made the Indians citizens (which contradicts the principle of “Indian sovereignty.”)

In any case, world history is little more than one group of people killing others and taking their land. Those who win write history. Those who lose — well, they lose. Where do you draw the line? My ancestors were Polish. Am I entitled to ca$h in from the Austrians, Prussians, Germans, and Russians?

And how about the Jews of Israel? Should they pay reparations to Palestinians and Ottoman Turks? Or should Muslims pay reparations to them, since Jews lived in Israel for several millenia before Islam was even founded?

Or should the Italians pay reparations to the Jews, since it was the Romans who exiled the majority of Jews from Judea in the second century?

* Feynman pretty much admitted that he was prompted to do his little experiment by an Air Force officer on the commission. The truth was going to come out, but Feynman was allowed to be the public face of understanding the accident cause. And he really enjoyed being center stage!

Posted in Affirmative Action, Blacks | Comments Off

The New York Times Pushed For The Invasion Of Iraq In 2003

Posted on March 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

FAIR in 2006: In a New York Times article (9/5/06) on George W. Bush’s September 5 speech concerning terrorism and Iraq, reporters David Sanger and John O’Neil included a striking revision of Bush’s reasoning for going to war:

The possibility that Saddam Hussein might develop ‘weapons of mass destruction’ and pass them to terrorists was the prime reason Mr. Bush gave in 2003 for ordering the invasion of Iraq.

Of course, the drive to war rested firmly on Bush’s repeated and emphatic claim that Hussein had already developed WMDs, which he possessed and was prepared to use—a bogus claim that the mainstream media, led by the Times‘ own Judith Miller, largely accepted as an article of faith and bolstered with credulous reports based on faulty information. (See Extra!, 7-8/03.)

Bush’s charges that Iraq concealed chemical and biological weapons were unequivocal. “Iraq has stockpiled biological and chemical weapons, and is rebuilding the facilities used to make more of those weapons,” Bush told the U.N. (9/12/02).

“The Iraqi regime . . . possesses and produces chemical and biological weapons. It is seeking nuclear weapons,” Bush said in a speech in Cincinnati (10/7/02). “We’ve also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse chemical or biological weapons across broad areas.”

“Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised,” Bush said in a March 17, 2003 address to the nation.

The New York Times‘ editorial page unskeptically accepted these claims and incorporated them into the paper’s own arguments. In a September 18, 2002 editorial, the paper declared:

What really counts in this conflict…is the destruction of Iraq’s unconventional weapons and the dismantling of its program to develop nuclear arms…. What makes Iraq the subject of intense concern, as Mr. Bush noted, is Mr. Hussein’s defiance of the Security Council’s longstanding instructions to dismantle Baghdad’s nuclear weapons program and to eliminate all its biological and chemical weapons and the materials used to make them.

After the U.N. Security Council passed a resolution on inspectors returning to Iraq, the Times editorialized (11/9/02):

The unwavering goal is to disarm Iraq, enforcing a string of previous Security Council resolutions that Baghdad has contemptuously ignored. The cost of letting that happen has been diminished authority for the United Nations and a growing danger that Iraq’s unconventional weapons will be used in war or passed on to terrorists. Mr. Bush has galvanized the Security Council to declare that its orders must now be obeyed and those dangers eliminated.

When the inspectors returned, the paper stated (12/6/02), “Iraq has to get rid of its biological and chemical arms and missiles and the means to make them, and abandon its efforts to develop nuclear weapons.” When the inspectors failed to find any evidence of banned weapons, the Times insisted (2/15/03): “The Security Council doesn’t need to sit through more months of inconclusive reports. It needs full and immediate Iraqi disarmament. It needs to say so, backed by the threat of military force.”

As the invasion approached, the editorialists endorsed (3/13/03) British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s six-point ultimatum to Iraq as the “last hope of forcing Saddam Hussein to disarm voluntarily.” The first point: “Mr. Hussein would have to acknowledge that he has hidden unconventional weapons and pledge to stop producing or concealing such weapons.”

The New York Times‘ revision of the record, maintaining that Bush only presented Iraqi WMDs as a “possibility,” threatens to erase one of the most significant chapters of recent history, in effect clearing the Bush administration—and the Times—of their role in misleading the country into war.

Posted in Iraq | Comments Off

New Yorker Editor David Remnick Pushed For The Iraq Invasion In 2003

Posted on March 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

Remnick wrote in February of 2003: The United States has been wrong, politically and morally, about Iraq more than once in the past; Washington has supported Saddam against Iran and overlooked some of his bloodiest adventures. The price of being wrong yet again could be incalculable. History will not easily excuse us if, by deciding not to decide, we defer a reckoning with an aggressive totalitarian leader who intends not only to develop weapons of mass destruction but also to use them.

Saddam’s abdication, or a military coup, would be a godsend; his sudden conversion to the wisdom of disarmament almost as good. It is a fine thing to dream. But, assuming such dreams are not realized, a return to a hollow pursuit of containment will be the most dangerous option of all.

Posted in Iraq | Comments Off

TV Anchor Fired For Telling The Truth

Posted on March 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

From Yahoo: Pittsburgh news anchor Wendy Bell was fired Wednesday from ABC affiliate WTAE after outcry over a recent Facebook post in which she used racially stereotypical language in talking about “young black men.”

Bell had been associated with WTAE for 18 years but could not withstand the outcry over her rant on the station’s own social media account speculating on the perpetrators of a then-unsolved murder…

The controversial comments were posted after a mass shooting in Wilkinsburg, Pennsylvania, in which six people were killed — but before police had made any arrests. “You needn’t be a criminal profiler to draw a mental sketch of the killers who broke so many hearts,” Bell wrote. “they are young black men, likely in their teens or early 20s.

“They have multiple siblings from multiple fathers and their mothers work multiple jobs. These boys have been in the system before. They’ve grown up there. They know the police. They’ve been arrested. They’ve made the circuit and nothing has scared them enough. Now they are lost. Once you kill a neighbor’s three children, two nieces and her unborn grandson, there’s no coming back. There’s nothing nice to say about that.”

NEWS: Authorities questioned a man Friday morning in connection to a shooting in Wilkinsburg that resulted in the deaths of six people, including an unborn baby, and left three others wounded, sources told Channel 11 News.

Lt. Kevin Kraus, of the Allegheny County Sheriff’s Office, said Friday that a man was arrested on a bench warrant for a probation violation. He was on Allegheny County’s Most Wanted list.

The man, identified as Cheron Shelton, was walked out of Allegheny County police headquarters in handcuffs about 9 a.m…

Earle discovered that Cheron Shelton has a lengthy criminal record that goes back a decade and includes mostly drug-related charges.

He was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance in January and driving on a suspended license. He was given probation.

A few weeks later, Cheron Shelton was arrested and charged with simple assault. He was jailed on $10,000 bail but released on Feb. 11, one month before the deadly Wilkinsburg shooting, when the judge agreed to reduced his bail to non-monetary.

Posted in Blacks, Crime, Journalism | Comments Off

Conservatives Vs Alt-Right

Posted on March 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments at Breitbart:

* How to become an “establishment” Republican in twelve easy steps:
1. Go to Washington with good intentions.
2. Instead of working for your constituents, start looking for easy corporate money.
3. Accept generous contributions from the Chamber of Greed and other global interests.
4. Sell out all your principles in exchange for cash for re-election.
5. Support reckless, mass immigration and block efforts to control our borders.
6. Allow major corporations to leave the U.S. and give “heartfelt and concerned” lip-service to your unemployed constituents at home.
7. Become enraged when someone like Donald Trump, who wants to slow immigration and job losses, threatens your cake ride.
8. Endorse Rubio.
9. After Rubio is forced out by “We the People,” back Ted Cruz, who helped write the TPA/TPP.
10. Feel shocked and offended when, like Paul Ryan, you’re booed in your own district and get booted our by a primary challenger.
11. Lose your seat in the primary.
12. Get a lucrative lobbyist job from the greedy corporations who corrupted you in the first place.

* Heres 4 real alt right sites.
book mark them and spend less time on BB.
Once I was blind but now I see.

http://www.counter-currents.com

http://www.radixjournal.com/

http://therightstuff.biz/2016/

http://www.dailystormer.com/

* Israel is explicitly a homeland for Jews. The state’s policies support and enhance the Jewish population. That means it becomes more Jewish as time goes on. We want the same for White countries.

* The Alt Right wouldn’t be satisfied with Israel’s degree of ethno-nationalism.
Israeli ethnic stats:
Jewish 75% (of which Israel-born 74.4%, Europe/America/Oceania-born
17.4%, Africa-born 5.1%, Asia-born 3.1%), non-Jewish 25% (mostly Arab)
(2013 est.)
Languages:
Hebrew (official), Arabic (used officially for Arab minority)
Israeli religious stats:
Jewish 75%, Muslim 17.5%, Christian 2%, Druze 1.6%, other 3.9% (2013 est.)

* People are not entering America to live in tepees on the prairie. They are heading for the cities the European invaders built. The Europeans did not set up camp in the middle of the Apache camp. The truth as you know but feel embarrassed to admit. Is the Europeans needed land to build their idea of civilisation. The tribes coming now,are not interested in building,,but simple living with the the Europeans. If your arguments were correct, we could sell these newcomers some land for a bag of beads, and they would build their utopia. The 3rd worlders have worked out the white man is actually the resource and are following him where ever he goes.

* It’s amazing how communists have managed to silence dissent by likening speech they dislike to actual violence. This seems to be almost universal on the left these days.

* When Alexander Hamilton moved from Nevis to New Jersey in 1772 he was simply moving from one area of British jurisdiction to another. He was not an immigrant to the USA.

* Diane Ravitch wrote “The Language Police” in 2004 about how special interest groups (’60s and ’70s activists) pressured text book publishers and wrested control of the language and content of textbooks and standardized exams, often at the expense of the truth (in the case of history), of literary quality (in the case of literature), and of education in general. Her book is filled with the multitude of text book distortions that makes Orwell’s “1984″ resemble an operating manual.

* The rise of villain as hero is because in the PC/Diversity world, only a very “bad” man with no limits seems to be able to get anything done. This is why people like Zack Snyder instinctively make Superman “dark” and dangerous — and of course the demand of women for ever greater dominance/Alphaness plays into that.

When most men were 9-5 corporate cogs who also had fought the Nazis and Tojo to defeat; and there was no competition from extreme violent diversity Alpha dominance, you could have credible heroes like the 1950′s Chuck Connors “the Rifleman” etc. Dominant Alpha but within rules. The current rules stifle White men who play within them; so you have vampires who are even more dangerous than the non-rule bound gangbanger, or “bad Dad” types like Breaking Bad Walter White or TV’s “the Blacklist” with James Spader.

More broadly speaking a mono-racial White society can have an adult attitude towards violence and dominance. Useful and required in times of war, set aside in times of peace. Traditionally this had been the arc of White society as Pinker noted through say 1965, if unevenly and not at the same pace in all White places.

A diverse society where Joe Average White Man lives cheek-by-jowl with say, a murderous Jihadi of Pakistani origin will default back to say, Los Angeles from 1830 to 1880. Reading “Eternity Street” about the vigilante justice in failed, lawless Los Angeles from that period, filled with all sorts of people including Californios, who hated Mexicans (and vice-versa), outlaws from Texas, school teacher vigilantes from Maine, Chilean and French immigrants, the Chinese, etc. you get the picture that vigilante violence and male dominance ramps up very high, with informal “rules” that demand communal vigilantism and violence by nearly all men in one form or another.

And that’s straight where we are headed.

Posted in Alt Right, Censorship, Conservatives | Comments Off

When Did Broadway Last Matter?

Posted on March 31, 2016 by Luke Ford

Comments:

* Ben Brantley wrote in The New York Times that “‘Hamilton’ is, among other things, about who owns history, who gets to be in charge of the narrative.”

* I figured he is your run of the mill, self flagellating, New York City white lib guy but no. He is also gay which a glance at his google images sorta also says.
wikipedia- Brantley, who is openly gay,[3] is single and lives in New York City.
So the above gay plus post-Hamiltonian, multi-ethnic mashup and pile on will be writing the history books (texts!) in a few decades. Civilization and its Discontents and the discontented are winning the culture wars!

* Broadway hasn’t mattered to regular folks since I don’t know. When was the last time you heard anyone humming a tune from a new musical? He’s touchdown dancing to the choir.

Unluckily, his type owns everything else in charge of the narrative, except for nooks and crannies like this blog, as you say. And common sense.

I wouldn’t worry about them controlling the past through their little plays, which seem to be written for ever narrower audiences.

* Broadway should be held to the same standards of non-discrimination every other business is held to, including laws against discriminating based on gender, age, and appearance. Porn movies should have to cast 84-year-old fat women as often as they cast 21-year-old vixens.

* The WaPo recently wrote this about Hamilton,“As a hero, the musical’s Hamilton represents the American dream in the form of an immigrant-made-good, born on the Caribbean Island of Nevis, then raising himself to high society through sheer determination and genius.”

This is interesting because it distinguishes Hamilton from the other Founders, and thus differentiates him from those Founders born in America. This is important because liberals and proposition-nation types like to say that the USA is a ‘nation of immigrants’. They say that we are ALL immigrants except of course for the natives.

I recall Patrick Buchanan writing against this prevailing notion that we are a nation of immigrants by explaining that our Founders for the most part were not immigrants. He pointed out how George Washington, his father and his grandfather had all been born in Virginia. He argued many Founders had similar stories, and thus we were not a nation of immigrants. Rather these were for the most part born and bred Americans who fought to establish a separate nation.

Now by promoting the notion that Hamilton was an immigrant, which he was, as opposed to the other Founders who were not, the liberals are acknowledging what Buchanan and probably most of us on this blog have always believed, namely that we are most definitely not a nation of immigrants. After all if we were a nation of immigrants then there would be no need to distinguish Hamilton from the others.

PS. As a footnote we’ve just been told that the European-born terrorists of Paris and Brussels have nothing to do with immigration. So I suppose that fact along with this new found love of Hamilton the immigrant serves to confirm that the USA is definitely not a nation of immigrants.

* This is white gentile/Jewish gays versus blacks and hispanics for jobs.

Obviously, a large percentage of potential white Hamilton actors are gay. Ditto for the non-white ones, but the black and Hispanic ones try harder to keep up a pretense of being straight while really on-the-down-low.

So the Hamilton creator—who is straight, and who was promoted by the gays and Jews of the NY theater scene as being the Great Minority Sondheim We’ve All Been Waiting For—-is biting the white gentile/Jewish gay hand that fed him and seeking to help out black and Hispanic dudes. It remains to be seen if this is just a momentary bit of infighting and he’ll be back in their good graces soon, or whether he’s pulling a Spike Lee in Mo’ Better Blues and pushing his luck a step too far.

* The “Assassin’s Creed” video games are an especially vile example of this kind of historical retconning. The transformation of the assassin in popular consciousness from villain to hero is perverse. Look at the characters thrown up as heroes in popular culture: the sniper, the assassin (the vampire?).

The younger generations already know next to nothing about history, and their poor understanding is further clouded by ridiculous crap like “Hamilton”. I wonder how many people in twenty years will actually believe that Hamilton was black.