I Don’t Think Venezuela Is Sending Us Their Best

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* NBC’s Today show just ran a lengthy interview of Machado, leading with a clip of Clinton at the debate, “Donald, she has a name. Her name is Alicia Machado. And she has become a US citizen and you can bet she is going to vote this November.” The sympathetic segment included the most heart-rending parts of Clinton’s TV ad featuring the former beauty queen’s abuse at the hands of the monster.

I guess NBC’s newshounds don’t watch CNN. No mention of the getaway car, the threats to the judge, the engagement-wrecking sex tape, or serving as baby mama for the cocaine cartel kingpin.

When it comes to new U.S. citizens, I’m not certain that Venezuela is sending us their best.

There’s a rumor that Today has scored a major coup in the Morning News Show ratings wars. They’ve recruited Haven Monahan as the newest Senior National Correspondent.

* Great coincidences in campaign reporting: The Guardian & Cosmo sent reporters just before debate to profile Machado, then pubbed today.

* Too bad we didn’t have a fence to keep out this useless eater Venezuelan beauty queen.
USA- not just Mexico and Guatemala’s dumping ground anymore!
Now we are the dumping ground for all of Latin America, for all the flotsam and jetsam washing up from Venezuela and everywhere south of the United States of America.

* “He can say whatever he wants to say. I don’t care. You know, I have my past, of course everybody has a past. And I’m no saint girl. But that is not the point now … (Trump) was really rude with me, he tried to destroy my self esteem. And now I’m a voice in the Latin community.”

Ah yes; the unspoken paradigm of our age – “yeah, okay, so I murdered a few muhfugguhs….so? Murder just a evvyday thing that happen, nome sane? ….but racism! That shit is juss sick and wrong!”

* This story about Alicia Machado is backfiring on Hillary and the MSM so badly it makes the birtherism affair look like a political masterstroke by comparison.

* We all have a past. I’ve been a getaway driver for assassins and threatened to kill judges many times – who hasn’t? Now can we get back to Donald Trump and his fat shaming. Fat shaming is the most important issue facing America today.

* This morning on Fox News, the announcer said an upcoming segment was going to examine whether Trump’s comments about Alicia Machado were blown up out of proportion.

If Ms. Machado put on 60 pounds, as CNN reported, I’d say she blew herself up out of proportion.

* The focus should be on how does someone of such obviously low moral character become a U.S. citizen in the first place? What skills is she bringing to our country and how are we better off that she is living here?

* There seems to be another complication brewing, which is that there are numerous hardcore porn videos featuring an “Alicia Machado”, who is billed as a former Miss Venezuela or somesuch. Not gonna link (for obvious reasons), and I didn’t watch them, but the lady in the stills bears a striking resemblance.

* These Alicia Machado stories are hysterically funny; it’s amazing that Hillary would use this individual to promote her campaign. Who came up with this idea, anyway? Bill?

I would say that Machado fulfills everyone’s expectations about trashy Latinas, and I think it’s only fair to draw attention to her past activities. Also, she’s very good looking in her various stages of undress. I also think it’s fair to mention — but not to link — the references to a sex tape.

In a way, it’s not fair to discuss someone’s personal life; ad hominem, and so on. But Hillary, and apparently with the cooperation of Ms Machado, chose to select her as a paragon of what the US is and should be. Therefore it’s not only fair to discuss the public career of that paragon, it is necessary.

I didn’t watch the debate because when I heard Hillary’s voice (my wife is big on HRC) I told my spouse I had to run the extra car to keep the battery up so I just drove around for half an hour.
I can’t imagine listening to HRC’s voice for the next four to eight years.

However, the point is that therefore I first heard about Alicia and Donald’s infamous fat shaming while scrolling my twitter feed the next morning. So naturally this appeared to be a gaffe on Donald’s part. It was an appeal — perhaps we might say a naked appeal — for the woman vote, since every woman feels that she is fat, and fat shaming is a political issue. But just as every woman feels that she should lose a few pounds, every woman is going to be envious of a woman of Alicia’s appearance, and moreover, the vast majority of woman are not going to approve of a woman who has made a career out of showing off her body. And that is why this further discussion is necessary.

As a guy, despite the obvious pleasant scenery, I couldn’t care less. However, the publicizing of the career of Ms Machado in the wake of the debate has I believe completely neutralized the “Sisters Unite!” nature of Hillary’s debate night appeal. And that’s worthwhile.

* I almost wish Trump would have said, “I’ve called men a lot worse things, Sweetie.”

And then maybe go on to point out that 99% of the soldiers killed in the damn Iraq war she voted for have been what her most ardent followers like to refer to as “males.” So don’t compare my decision to tweak an irresponsible beauty contest winner 20 years ago to the seriously damaging decisions you have made in your years of “public service.”

* Speaking of loaded language. Here’s the opening of the Editorial Steve linked to in a different entry:

“… When Mrs. Clinton finally got to unload what felt like the pent-up frustration of Everywoman, it was powerful.”

Powerful!

And it was “pent up,” because God knows she’s never had an opportunity express this grievance earlier.

* It seems that Ms. Machado has a problem with la verdad. Megyn Kelly on Fox last night asked her about a contradiction about when she got her “eating disorder.” In 1997 Machado told WaPo she was already barfing up her arepas in preparation for the pageant.

Machado stays on the “Trump bad” message:

“I’m heeere because I know dis person and he nada good person. Dad is de poyn.”

* Can you even be a Miss Universe contestant and be a feminist?

* Trump could not have designed a more perfect case in point, for what Democrats do with immigration, than this woman. Hillary finds a repugnant alien from a Socialist hellhole, who obviously does not have the qualities we look for in a citizen, but who is ready to bring her Socialist country’s narcissistic sense of personal entitlement to all the riches of our country; said alien then proceeds to shill for the treasonous political elites who hooked her up with access to native whites’ social and financial capital, promising to vote against the idea that America and its people should come first; when we are not sufficiently obsequious in this process, they have the temerity to spit in our faces and call us racists.

This is obviously illustrative of our immigration problem in its entirety: we should thank Hillary for making our point for us, and publicize the fact everywhere. I think Trump could be almost as angry and hostile to Hillary as he wanted on this topic in the next debate, with excellent results. I keep hearing people say that Hillary is actually quite smart and has been seasoned by years of political manoeuvering, and that Trump should beware her political acumen. That sounds like it should be true, but I keep concluding that, in fact, she and the rest of the Left have simply never faced real opposition. If one is willing to strike back, they have left themselves open to any number of devastating attacks.

* I think its the duty of men on the alt-right, or just plain old responsible white guys of republican virtue, to stop coddling political nonsense in their women.

Lay it out: “This is a war against white people, against Western civilization–against everything i inherited from my ancestors and hope to pass down to our civilization. If you vote against our civilization you’re voting against me and our children’s future. It is not acceptable and i’m not going to tolerate it. It’s a bright line for me.”

I’ll leave the question of a spanking and what follows it to you. But it’s long past time that white men stopped tolerating adolescent political stupidity in their women.

* What would be unforgivable to me as an employer is the lack of background vetting. Hasn’t HRC’s staff ever heard of Google? Anybody who can use a browser could have found out in half an hour what a nutcase adventuress (love that word) this babe is, but no doubt HRC’s staff think they are so much smarter than everyone else.

* Someone uploaded this 1997 CNN video featuring Trump and Machado. I don’t know if someone else has posted it on another thread. I apologize if they did. But if you haven’t seen it, watch it. Trump is amazingly nice to this woman. And she seems very cheerful and friendly to Trump. Anyone watching this will come away thinking Trump is a good guy.

* Machado may be easy on the eyes, but she is fundamentally the Venezuelan version of white trash. She loves to eat fattening junk food, her taste in men runs toward men who are browner than she is and who are known to the police, and she is a baby momma. America has plenty of its own native white trash women and their illegitimate offspring and really doesn’t need to import any more.

* Having checked out her, er, body of work in the last few minutes I can say she definitely has skills. But nothing a willing American lady couldn’t replicate.

Posted in Alicia Machado | Comments Off on I Don’t Think Venezuela Is Sending Us Their Best

ADL Declares ‘Pepe the Frog’ as Official Hate Symbol

I feel safer already! Glad to see the Jewish Establishment tackling the issues that really matter.

I am sure the Israeli flag is a hate symbol to opponents of the Jewish state and the Cross is a symbol of hate to those who feel oppressed by Christianity.

According to the Bible, those who love God must hate evil. There’s nothing wrong with hate when properly directed.

Forward: The Anti Defamation League (ADL) has added “Pepe the Frog” to its database of online hate symbols. The cartoon frog is a popular meme among “alt-right” Twitter trolls and white supremacists.

Pepe the Frog was originally created in 2005 without any anti-Semitic or racist overtones. At the time, it was simply a meme of a sad frog.

But more recently the frog has been portrayed with a Hitler-like mustache, wearing a yarmulke or a Ku Klux Klan hood.

Pepe has also been used in hateful messages targeted at Jewish and other users on Twitter, according to the ADL.

“Once again, racists and haters have taken a popular Internet meme and twisted it for their own purposes of spreading bigotry and harassing users,” said Jonathan A. Greenblatt, the ADL’s CEO.

“These anti-Semites have no shame. They are abusing the image of a cartoon character, one that might at first seem appealing, to harass and spread hatred on social media.”

Earlier this month, Trump’s son posted a movie poster parody of himself heroically grouped with Pepe and others deemed “The Deplorables” on Instagram.

Posted in ADL, Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on ADL Declares ‘Pepe the Frog’ as Official Hate Symbol

BY THE NUMBERS: The Twittersphere of the Trolls

From the Jewish newspaper Forward:

“Your clothes will be removed & fumigated. You will be held down and given a bath!,” a Twitter troll tweeted at a Huffington Post journalist, complete with a picture of herself in a gas chamber.

What sounds like an extreme example, is only one of the many attacks on Jews and Jewish journalsits by the “alt-right” during the last months.

So do Jews ever tweet mean things about gentiles? Asking for a friend. Is the hate only in one direction?

Through statements and policy proposals tinged with racism — such as advocating a ban on Muslims entering the
country, and saying many Mexican immigrants are drug dealers and rapists — Trump has become a favorite of white nationalist groups and provided an unprecedented platform for their views.

“It’s pretty substantial, what’s out there,” said Todd Gutnick, a spokesman for the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which in June created a task force to document attacks on journalists, and analyze the size of the “alt-right” movement.

How many journalists have been murdered by the Alt-Right in the past year? Or are “attacks” simply mean words? So because journalists no longer have a monopoly on attacking people publicly, this is a major crisis?

The ADL is planning to release a detailed report on their findings in October.

In the meantime, we have collected some numbers that showcase the scope of “alt-right” activity on social media, including Twitter trolls.

250,000 anti-Semitic posts are made public across social media platforms every year

The United Nations reported during a recent conference that deals with digital anti-Semitism.

And how many anti-Gentile tweets are made each week? Or is anti-Gentilism not even a thing? Who cares about the goyim? They have it coming?

63 percent of all anti-Semitic tweets are calls for violence against Jews

Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, Danny Danon, said this during the same UN conference.

So different groups have different interests and many members of groups are willing to fight for their group interest? That’s truly shocking, and exactly what Jews (and every other people) had to do to create their own country. Politics is serious because people get killed in these conflicts of interests.

Stephen Pollard, the editor of the Jewish Chronicle, receives 20-30 anti-Semitic Twitter messages per day

“And that’s after I have blocked over 300 different tweeters – a number that increases every day,” he wrote at the end of July.

Well, if he can’t take it, maybe he should sell insurance?

The Global Forum for Combating Antisemitism (GFCA) tracked 2,000 anti-Semitic posts on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube over a period of 10 months. During that time, only 20 percent were removed by the social media sites.

The report for the Israeli Government led forum was produced by the Online Hate Prevention Institute (OHPI) in Australia and published in the report “Report on Measuring the Hate The State of Antisemitism in Social Media” in February. “This demonstrates a significant gap between what the community understand to be antisemitic, […] and what social media platforms are currently willing to remove,” they wrote regarding the the fact that 80 percent of all anti-semitic posts they reported remained online.

How many anti-gentile posts were made and what percentage were removed?

Posted in Alt Right, Anti-Semitism | Comments Off on BY THE NUMBERS: The Twittersphere of the Trolls

Washington Post: Trump stumbles into Clinton’s trap by feuding with Latina beauty queen

Accused accomplice to murder who threatened to kill a judge is Hillary most cunning move! Wow, just wow.

Washington Post: It might be Hillary Clinton’s most cunning move since the start of the general election. The Democratic nominee set a trap for Donald Trump in the final minutes of the first debate, and he walked right into it.

The GOP nominee’s decision to take the bait and rehash his past attacks of a former Miss Universe for gaining too much weight is now dominating the conversation. And the controversy is helping the Clinton campaign galvanize Latinos and prevent undecided women from moving toward Trump.

Even as Trump proclaimed victory in New York, he allowed during a Fox News interview yesterday that he let himself get a little too irritated “at the end, maybe” when Clinton brought up Alicia Machado. Machado alleges that Trump called her names such as “Miss Piggy” and “Miss Housekeeping” when she gained weight after winning the Miss Universe crown in 1996.

Posted in Alicia Machado | Comments Off on Washington Post: Trump stumbles into Clinton’s trap by feuding with Latina beauty queen

WP: This New York Times ‘Hitler’ book review sure reads like a thinly veiled Trump comparison

If Donald Trump is Hitler, then Hitler wasn’t such a bad guy.

Aaron Blake writes for the Washington Post: In the New York Times, Michiko Kakutani reviewed a new book about Adolf Hitler, titled “Hitler: Ascent 1889-1939.”

To many observers, though, it read like a bit more than a book review. It read like a comparison between Hitler and Donald Trump.

It’s true that the review didn’t name Trump — or even allude to the 2016 U.S. presidential race. But it came across to more than a few readers as an intentional, point-by-point comparison of Hitler’s rise and Trump’s.

And it’s not hard to see why. From the headline — “In ‘Hitler,’ an Ascent From ‘Dunderhead’ to Demagogue” — to the conclusion 1,300 words later, nearly everything Kakutani says about Volker Ullrich’s book reflects long-standing warnings by some about how Trump shouldn’t be dismissed as some sideshow and that history shows where this can lead.

In response to an inquiry from The Fix, Times spokesperson Danielle Rhoades Ha said, “The review speaks for itself.”

Below is what Kakutani wrote (in italics) and the parallels being drawn to Trump.

Some have focused on the social and political conditions in post-World War I Germany, which Hitler expertly exploited — bitterness over the harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles and a yearning for a return to German greatness; unemployment and economic distress amid the worldwide Depression of the early 1930s; and longstanding ethnic prejudices and fears of “foreignization.”

Trump’s appeal has largely been attributed to continued economic stagnation and frustration, particularly among working-class whites. His slogan is “Make America Great Again.” He has also campaigned against immigration and foreign agreements like free-trade pacts, and even questioned the fairness of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

Mr. Ullrich, like other biographers, provides vivid insight into some factors that helped turn a “Munich rabble-rouser” — regarded by many as a self-obsessed “clown” with a strangely “scattershot, impulsive style” — into “the lord and master of the German Reich.”

Democrats often complain that the press dismisses Trump as something of a narcissistic oaf or a clown who is beholden to his own campaigning whims.

His manic speeches and penchant for taking all-or-nothing risks raised questions about his capacity for self-control, even his sanity. But Mr. Ullrich underscores Hitler’s shrewdness as a politician — with a “keen eye for the strengths and weaknesses of other people” and an ability to “instantaneously analyze and exploit situations.”

Trump’s inability to “pivot” and turn himself into a more “presidential” candidate has long contrasted with theories of him actually being a secret political genius, doing things the media hasn’t picked up on, and constantly over-performing expectations.

Hitler was known, among colleagues, for a “bottomless mendacity” that would later be magnified by a slick propaganda machine that used the latest technology (radio, gramophone records, film) to spread his message.

Trump is often credited with exploiting the media — as well as social media — to get his message out. He largely eschews the conventional approach of relying heavily on TV advertising.

A former finance minister wrote that Hitler “was so thoroughly untruthful that he could no longer recognize the difference between lies and truth” and editors of one edition of “Mein Kampf” described it as a “swamp of lies, distortions, innuendoes, half-truths and real facts.”

Trump’s tendency to make up facts, spew utter distortions and rely on innuendo has put the media in a position of deciding whether to outright say that he is “lying.” At the root of that debate is the question of whether he knows what he’s saying is false.

He peppered his speeches with coarse phrases and put-downs of hecklers. Even as he fomented chaos by playing to crowds’ fears and resentments, he offered himself as the visionary leader who could restore law and order.

This is Trump, Trump and Trump. His clashes with hecklers and his tendency to talk about roughing up protesters were both features of the GOP primary campaign. And “law and order” has become a secondary campaign slogan of late.

Hitler increasingly presented himself in messianic terms, promising “to lead Germany to a new era of national greatness,” though he was typically vague about his actual plans.

Again: “Make America Great Again.” And Trump has been nothing if not vague about his plans. The media regularly reinforces the fact that his policy prescriptions are completely malleable and subject to change on a moment’s notice — if not within the same breath.

The unwillingness of Germany’s political parties to compromise had contributed to a perception of government dysfunction, Mr. Ullrich suggests, and the belief of Hitler supporters that the country needed “a man of iron” who could shake things up. “Why not give the National Socialists a chance?” a prominent banker said of the Nazis. “They seem pretty gutsy to me.”

Posted in Adolf Hitler | Comments Off on WP: This New York Times ‘Hitler’ book review sure reads like a thinly veiled Trump comparison

Alicia Machado’s Incredibly Sanitized Wikipedia Page

I guess the Hillary campaign controls Wikipedia. The tech giants are united against Trump. They will do everything they can to rig this election.

Here is Alicia Machado’s current Wikipedia page:

Yoseph Alicia Machado Fajardo (Spanish pronunciation: [aˈlisja maˈtʃaðo]; who was born December 6, 1976, in Maracay) is a Venezuelan-born American actress, TV host, singer and beauty queen who won Miss Universe 1996. She was the fourth woman from Venezuela to be named Miss Universe.

Machado won the 1995 Miss Venezuela pageant entering Yaracuy and then the Miss Universe 1996 crown in Las Vegas. The runner-up, Jacqueline Aguilera, also won the Miss World 1995 crown, marking the second time that two Venezuelans from the same pageant won two world titles. Machado’s reign came as American businessman Donald Trump took ownership of the Miss Universe pageant.

During her reign as Miss Universe, Machado made headlines when it was reported that she gained too much weight and the Miss Universe Organization was considering replacing her with her runner-up, Taryn Mansell of Aruba. After winning the Miss Universe title in 1996, Machado announced that all she wanted to do was “eat, eat and eat”.[1] Machado retained her title. Trump called her “an eating machine”, generating controversy.[2] In 1998, she made her debut on the popular Venezuelan soap opera Samantha in the titular role. She won the Midia Award in Spain and the Ace award in New York City, as the new Actress of the Year. Following the success of Samantha she was called to star in Infierno en el Paraiso, another successful soap opera. In 1999 she released her debut album Alicia En El Pais De Las Maravillas. A second album was released in November 2007.[citation needed]

In 2001, she had a small role on the international soap opera Secreto de Amor. During 2004–2005, she pursued a career as a TV commercial model with particular success in promoting a dieting product. In 2005, Machado appeared on a Spanish reality show called La Granja de los famosos (“The Farm”). On February 19, 2006, Machado debuted on a Mexican reality show named Cantando Por Un Sueño (“Singing For A Dream”), a program in the line of the previous Bailando Por Un Sueño (“Dancing For A Dream”), in which the winner has the chance for a dream to come true. The show is very similar to Dancing with the Stars (U.S.) and ¡Más que baile! (formerly titled ¡Mira Quién Baila!) (“Look Who’s Dancing!”) (Spain).[citation needed]

Machado appeared in (and on the cover of) the February 2006 issue of Playboy magazine’s Mexican edition, becoming the only Miss Universe to pose nude for Playboy.[3] On September 9, 2012, she was one of ten competitors on the third season of Mira Quien Baila. On November 18, 2012, Alicia won 3rd place in the 3rd season of Univision’s dance competition Mira Quien Baila. In 2013, Machado stars as the protagonist of La Madame, a television serial produced by RTI Productions and RCN TV in Colombia. In February 2014, she joined Univision’s beauty pageant Nuestra Belleza Latina 2014 as a mentor where she coach the participants on how to succeed in the modeling and television industry.

Relationships
Machado once dated professional baseball player Bobby Abreu; the couple later split, calling off their engagement.[4][5]

Political views
On November 24, 2010, BBC Mundo confirmed that Machado had to close her Twitter account after writing a tweet that called for “peace between the Chinas”, referring to North and South Korea.[6] Her gaffe unleashed a rush of insulting posts, prompting her to go offline. “I now have a lot of psychopaths on the account and it’s best I start another one, kisses,” she signed off, according to Venezuelan media.[7]

Since June 2016 she has been publicly campaigning for the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.[8][9]

In May 2016, Machado became a U.S. citizen.[10] She has spoken out many times against Donald Trump, who, during her year as Miss Universe, she claims called her “Miss Piggy” because she gained weight and “Miss Housekeeping” because of her Hispanic background.[2] Trump said: “She was impossible” and that “[s]he was the winner and you know, she gained a massive amount of weight and it was a real problem. We had a real problem. Not only that, her attitude, and we had a real problem with her.”[11]

Fox News reports:

Miss Universe Alicia Machado accused of threatening to kill judge in late ’90s

It turns out 1996 Miss Universe winner Alicia Machado, cited by Hillary Clinton in the first presidential debate as an example of Donald Trump’s mistreatment of women, has a complicated past.

Shortly after she won her crown in the late ’90s, a judge in Venezuela accused Machado of threatening to kill him after he indicted her then-boyfriend for attempted murder.

Machado threatened “to ruin my career as a judge and … kill me,” Judge Maximiliano Fuenmayor said at the time.

Her boyfriend, Juan Rafael Rodriguez Regetti, was accused of shooting and wounding his sister’s husband, who he blamed for his sister’s suicide.

Rodriguez was accused of shooting and wounding Francisco Antonio Sbert Mousko outside a church in Caracas where his wife — Rodriguez’s sister — was being eulogized.

Sbert reportedly suffered brain damage from the attack.

The victim’s family accused Machado of driving her boyfriend’s getaway car, but she denied any involvement and apparently was never indicted, due to lack of evidence.

Now a U.S. citizen, Machado told reporters Tuesday in a conference call arranged by Hillary Clinton’s campaign that her experience with Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump could “open eyes” in the election.

After the debate, Machado tweeted her thanks to Clinton, writing in Spanish: “Thanks Mrs. Hillary Clinton. Your respect for women and our differences makes you great. I’m with you.”

In June, Machado appeared at a news conference in Virginia held by immigrant advocacy groups to encourage Latino voters to support Clinton.

Machado says that when she gained weight after being crowned Miss Universe for 1996, Trump, who ran the pageant, labeled her “Miss Piggy.”

Asked about the exchange during an interview Tuesday with “Fox & Friends,” Trump said Machado was “the worst we ever had,” adding: “She gained a massive amount of weight. It was a real problem.”

After the debate, Clinton’s campaign quickly released a web video detailing Machado’s story, portraying her as a mortified pageant winner whom Trump called “fat” or “ugly” and who was blindsided by reporters Trump invited to watch her work out.

Daily Mail:

Sex on a reality TV show, a Playboy photo shoot, a threat to kill a judge and claims that a drug lord fathered her baby: Behind the Hillary Clinton campaigner ‘fat-shamed’ by Trump
Alicia Machado’s life has been turned upside down after Hillary Clinton used her to show Donald Trump’s sexism for ‘fat-shaming’ her in 1996
News reports in Spanish indicate that she fathered a child with a notorious Mexican drug kingpin, something she denies
The witness who testified about that relationship was killed by a hitman
Venezuelan judge accused her of threatening to kill him for charging her boyfriend with attempted murder in a case where she drove getaway car
Machado wouldn’t deny that on CNN Tuesday night: ‘I’m not a saint girl. … that happened 20 years ago’
She also appeared in a 2005 Spanish reality TV show, having sex with a fellow contestant on-camera while moaning: ‘What a tasty d***’ – while she was enggaed to Major League Baseball player Bobby Abreu
Shuttered her Twitter account in 2010 after wishing for ‘peace between the Chinas’ – mistaking China for North and South Korea

Less than 48 hours after she became a household name as Hillary Clinton’s newest high-profile backer, former Miss Universe Alicia Machado’s life has begun to unravel into a tangle of sex and violence that could give Clintonworld second thoughts about putting her under the spotlight.
Machado added an extended 15 minutes to her fame by claiming Donald Trump ridiculed her in 1996 – calling her ‘Miss Piggy’ and an ‘eating machine’ – after he bought the Miss Universe franchise and she added more than 40 pounds to her beauty queen frame as the title-holder.
But focus has snapped back to Machado’s own past, including a 2006 Mexican Playboy photo shoot that made her the only Miss Universe winner to pose in the buff, and a stint on a Spanish reality TV show where she was shown having sex on camera – while engaged to a Major League Baseball player.
More troubling is the story emerging about the paternity of Machado’s daughter Dinorah, born in 2008.
Univision reported in 2010 that Gerardo Álvarez-Vázquez, a drug kingpin linked to the infamous Sinaloa cartel, fathered the child.
And the police informant who first testified about the pair’s relationship was executed gangland-style in a Mexico City cafe months later in broad daylight.
Álvarez-Vázquez, nicknamed ‘El Indio’ or ‘El Chayán,’ was arrested in April of that year and charged with running the Beltrán-Leyva narco-trafficking cartel, a Sinaloa affiliate.
The U.S. government at the time considered him a fugitive, and offered a $2 million reward for his capture.
He was ‘responsible for facilitating communications between [cartel] hierarchy and Central and South American sources of supply for cocaine,’ the State Department writes.
‘Álvarez-Vázquez was also believed to be responsible for overseeing the … narcotics-related activities in multiple cities of Mexico and to be actively involved in major bulk crystal methamphetamine procurements. He coordinated the movement of illegal narcotics into the United States and overs[aw] the repatriation of narcotics-related proceeds.’
The Mexico City newspaper El Universal reported in 2010 that Vázquez had faced drug trafficking charges in California going back to 2007 – the year Machado became pregnant.
Reforma, another Mexico City newspaper, cited a police report on Vázquez’s arrest, reporting that he and four other drug lords attended Dinorah’s 2008 baptism.
They included cartel ‘chiefs’ Arturo and Héctor Beltrán, top lieutenant Edgar Valdés Villarreal and Colombian drug trafficker Harold Mauricio Ojeda.
Vázquez’s role in the drug cartel was to drum up business with other criminal gangs in Central and South America, Univision reported. He was also a reputed ‘sicario’ – a hitman.
The police shootout that resulted in his capture killed two other sicarios and resulted in the arrests of 18 more.
Machado issued a stinging denial – after Vázquez’s arrest – telling People in Spanish that she ‘did not have any relationship… with Mr. Jose Gerardo Alvarez Vazquez known by the nickname of “the Indian”.’
She said her daughter’s father was ‘a very respectable businessman’ named Rafael Hernandez Linares.’
But in the same statement Machado also claimed the story of drug lords attending her daughter’s christening could not be true because Dinorah had never been baptized – a highly unusual omission in 81-percent Catholic Mexico.

Machado had already drawn unwanted attention, and compromised Clinton’s deployment of her as a campaign surrogate, when DailyMail.com republished news reports from 1998 describing her alleged involvement in an attempted murder in her native Venezuela.
Venezuelan judge Maximiliano Fuenmayor in 1998 publicly accused her of threatening to kill him for charging her then-boyfriend Juan Rodriguez Reggeti with attempted murder in a case where she was accused of being the getaway driver.
Machado insisted she wasn’t present at the funeral where shots rang out, offering two separate alibis. At first she claimed she was acting on the set of a TV show at the time, and later she said she was home sick.
Tuesday night on CNN, anchor Anderson Cooper asked her about the episode.
‘The judge in the case also said you had threatened to kill him after he indicted your boyfriend for the attempted murder.’ Cooper said. ‘I just want to give you a chance to address these reports.’
‘He can say whatever he wants to say. I don’t care,’ Machado said, referring to Trump as she waved her hand in defiance.
‘You know, I have my past. Of course. Everybody has. Everybody has a past. And I’m not a saint girl. But that is not the point now.’
Machado in the same breath called the accusation ‘wrong’ and said it ‘happened’ decades earlier.
‘That moment in Venezuela was wrong, was another speculation about my life, because I’m a really famous person in my country, because I’m an actress there, and in Mexico too,’ she said.
‘And he can use whatever he wants to use. The point is, that happened 20 years ago.’
Machado herself returned from obscurity to fame on the strength of complaints about something Trump said to her more than 20 years ago.

Posted in Alicia Machado | Comments Off on Alicia Machado’s Incredibly Sanitized Wikipedia Page

Border and Order in the Debate

Steve Sailer writes:

One hour and one minute into the first presidential debate, Donald Trump finally mentioned, in passing, the word that had gotten him this far: “border.”

And then Trump immediately forgot to bring up borders anymore, other than a rushed reference to the Border Patrol endorsing him. (He touched very briefly three times on “immigration.”)

Not surprisingly, Trump’s two opponents, Hillary Clinton and Lester Holt, didn’t bring up borders.

Trump can hardly rely on them. NBC’s Holt had heard plenty of “you’ll never work in this town again” threats from his colleagues in the press if he didn’t bias the questions against Trump more than Matt Lauer had at a lower-key Clinton-Trump forum on Sept. 7.

Holt did an expert job of tilting his moderation toward Hillary while still giving Trump a fighting chance. Sure, that’s not fair, but that’s the best Trump can expect in the debates.

At this point Trump is on track to rank, along with Henry Clay, William Jennings Bryan, Al Smith, Barry Goldwater, and George McGovern, as one of the finest losers in American history. To win, however, Trump’s effort is going to have to be even more heroic than it has been to get him to where he is.

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* It’s the first time I recall seeing him debating while he was sick. We don’t know if it was a cold, or full blown flu. If it was the latter, you can get sick enough to feel dissociated from your surroundings enough that it will affect your performance. Also, if it was the latter, considering the pounding of Hillary regarding her health, he wouldn’t volunteer any information about his.

The major flaw in his performance is he was on defense, instead of always taking the initiative. His debate style is certainly like “Patton in the Field.” Patton never intentionally fell back, defended, or held ground. He kept moving forward, always taking initiative, which usually kept his opposition off-balance. That’s how Donald’s gotten away with so much, and literally changed the game.

If I were managing his debates, I’d make a list of every charge the opposition could make, and preload a response using a past Hillary incident related in theme, followed by committed indignation, and a demand for her to apologize and repent. Since Hillary has SO much material, debating her should be like shooting fish in a barrel. I’d also consider the debate host to be an agent for the opposition, and always keep it in mind, and dismiss “small” questions like Fat Dumb Pigwoman Rosie O’Donnell, while delineating the difference between an entertainment entrepreneur’s motivation, and a politician’s.

It could be he was just sick. It could be he was testing the media waters in this context before he starts leaning into her, while taking a conservative approach. Could have been both. In any case, as we’ve all noticed, it’s often a fool’s errand to second-guess Trump by conventional reasoning.

* I don’t think he was sick. I’ve noticed him breathing through his nose like that every time he speaks. What might have been different at the debate, suggested Rush Limbaugh, is the compression setting on the audio from Trump’s mic, which may have magnified the sound of his breathing.

* Stephen Miller probably needs someone whose known Trump a lot longer to convince Trump to prep for the next debate. I don’t know who that person might be. It doesn’t look like it’s going to be Trump’s consigliere, Michael Cohen. I don’t know how much advice Trump takes from his sons. He would probably listen to his daughter Ivanka, but she’s friends with Chelsea and very nice.

The best bets might be Ivanka’s husband, or Ann Coulter, if she can get through.

* One aspect everyone seems to have missed is that Ivanka’s friendship with Chelsea dulled Trump’s aggressiveness. Trump eliptically admitted the same.

Why do folks on both sides think it’s possible to be friends with the enemy? In reality, the capitalist class is united against the working class.

* Donald Trump doesn’t have attention span to go over those responses, so we’re just stuck with whatever’s in his head at a particular moment.

* The online-daily Japantoday had it this way on may, 10th:”So what explains Trump’s astonishing political success? The best explanation was given in October by, of all people, the legendary rock star Alice Cooper, who said, “I know Donald, and I know he’s a ‘doer.’ He’s not a ‘sayer.’”

* Do you really think Kelly Anne Conway didn’t know what debate prep is supposed to be done? Please. It wasn’t because no one near him understood how you prepare for a debate.

He won’t do it. It takes sustained work in a manner he can’t do. He has had the last 15 months to learn this stuff, but he didn’t care, he didn’t think he needed to, etc. He can’t.

God help us.

* Trump needs to explicitly direct his immigration reduction message to women. Trump has to repetitively pound home the message that mass immigration and illegal immigration are harming the United States. Trump must say that he will protect and defend the United States from danger.

Trump might say: “The United States is suffering under the strain of mass immigration. The current US immigration policy of allowing well over a million legal immigrants into the country every year is pushing the United States to the breaking point. I use the term mass immigration because that is what is going on — one million plus immigrants a year is too much. The United States must reduce legal mass immigration and stop illegal immigration cold.”

Trump might say: “Mass immigration is damaging the United States. Mass immigration swamps schools, overwhelms hospitals, lowers wages and harms the environment. Mass immigration brings radical Islamic terrorism to the United States. Mass immigration brings infectious diseases such as TB and Ebola to the United States. Mass immigration destroys cultural cohesion. Mass immigration makes it harder for young people to affordably form their own new families. We must defend and protect the United States by bringing the era of mass immigration to an end.”

* I watched Frontline last night. This is OT but out of the many things I noticed was that they went on at length about Trump’s divorces and Bill Clinton’s affairs but they did not talk directly about or frame it in terms of Hillary’s sexuality. Trump is running against Hillary, not Bill and we already know what he did. Of course, this is the media’s way of protecting her and women in general but the more I reflect on it the weirder it becomes. They did not connect the dots regarding Hillary’s position on birth control and her lack of progeny and how is can effect marriage or her 2nd wave ambivalence to marriage and the lack of comfort her husband seemed to find in it. They also completely ignored her attacks on the women her husband had affairs with. Frontline referred to Monica’s blue dress as a “souvenir” rather than as evidence which is why it was kept. Trump and Bill are actors, Hillary is acted on; except when it is for cool tank girl stuff.

* There is little Trump can do; the problem is not his performance in the debates but the fracturing of White society. This fracturing is not a Jewish conspiracy but the real and profound differences between elites and ordinary people and men and women.

Elites form a hereditary, semi-feudal class controlling politics, aping the Chinese Communist Party. One doesn’t get rich to be powerful — one gets powerful like Clinton to be rich. Hillary and Obama, both non-entities in accomplishment, wield more power than even Mark Zuckerberg. And they wield the power because they are an aging harpy feminist, and an anti-White Black man respectively.

Which taps into the secret weapon of elites — the bitter resentment of White women particularly the Professional Class over their male peers. Not only are too many White men nerdy/unsexy, they create social and technological chaos by rapid technological change that improves lives and makes settled aristocracy difficult.

* Scott Adams was right: Trump came out with one goal—seem less scary/more presidential—and he succeeded at it.

Hillary had a number of goals: make Trump scary; not fall down; offer a message that will excite voters; make herself appear trustworthy; make herself seem presidential.

She failed on all of those points but one: she didn’t fall down or show signs of her Parkinson’s—at least obvious signs.

Trump has been trumpeting his restraint at the debate, which is the right way to go. He’s emphasizing his demeanor as presidential, which is what your mom and your milqutoast democrat male relatives want to see. He’s already got those of us who want a bruiser; now he’s just showing he knows when to be a bruiser and when to be gentler. (BTW, this was probably difficult for him to do in public, because he’s used to showing his bruiser side as his public side and then going gentler behind closed doors. Trump’s a skillful business man, and he never likes giving away too much of his game up front, so he’s not used to displaying his restraint in front of an audience).

Meanwhile, Hillary made a number of own-goal statements that may come back to haunt her. She kept saying things that create triggers that lead the public back to her faults. Some statements included:

-”special prosecutor”–not only bringing up her husband’s scandals, but also the idea floating that she needs a special prosecutor for her actions, as the FBI/Justice department is too close to her
-”Russia”-she caused the current bad-relations with Russia.
-”Saudi Arabia”- bringing up your biggest donors? Not a good plan.
-”tax returns”–Trump skillfully tied this to her email hiding. By trying to make Trump seem sneaky, she made her own sneakiness front and center. But it also brought up the Clinton Foundation’s money-laundering operation.
-”Solar power”-Trump brought up Solyndra, although he failed to recall the name, which would have been better.

I was surprised she didn’t accidentally bring up immigration and her health herself, the way she was going. Part of Trump’s restraint may have been not interrupting your opponent while they’re making a mistake.

* Trump has never been a big reader. So he is not particularly articulate. But by not being a big reader, he has avoided being brainwashed by the ideas that corp/gov/media has put into our culture.

* Steve’s concept of Magic Dirt is more useful than I at first grasped. Initially, my understanding of it was in the context of Chetty’s demographic work that demonstrated how certain zip codes in America showed the greatest likelihood for a person’s wealth increasing over the course of their lives. So, Chetty reasoned, if all of America’s poor people just pulled up stakes and moved to these zip codes, then they would become fabulously wealthy.

A similar type of reasoning prevailed in the Marxist takeover in Rhodesia. The Revolutionaries thought that if they could only wrest the land from whitey, then they, the oppressed people of color, would be free at last. And so the white land-owning farmers were dispossessed.

But, as we all know, things didn’t turn out as planned. The new owners weren’t interested in farming and so the fields were left fallow. Instead of farming, the owners strip mined the tangible assets, selling the irrigation pipes and copper wiring from the homes for scrap. Disaster followed as famine swept the land and many starved, creating an international crisis which is only ameliorated by aid intervention by countries in which farming is still carried out by whites.

So, one could say that the Marxists who carried out the revolution and land redistribution in Zimbabwe also fell into the “magic dirt” trap. They, like you Tiny Duck, believe that wealth derives from some thing; that it inheres in a commodity such as copper or aluminum or soil. But as any sensible person realizes, wealth is created by a process, a system that is the product of human genius and applied technique. As Lao Tzu would say, the “worth” of a pipe lies in the hole created in the middle and not in the bare scrap value of the material surrounding that hole.

It’s interesting in this regard to note that Obama’s father’s graduate thesis while at Harvard touched on just this subject. Should we, he asked himself, once we have seized the farms from the evil white Kenyan landholders, redistribute it as small parcels to individual families or should we organize it into huge collective farms? And so he compared the likelihood of yields based upon calculations of relative efficiency. He simply takes it for granted that Kenyans would want to farm and would be good at it, assuming that the productive capacity somehow inheres in the redistributed soil and not in the native genius of the people.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Border and Order in the Debate

WP Writer: ‘I never worry I’ll be shot in Chicago. After all, I’m white.’

I never worry about being shot by police either because I obey the law and when pulled over for a moving violation, I always follow the officer’s directions.

This guy is saying that white people are less likely to provoke people, including cops, into shooting them. That sounds racist to me.

Washington Post:

Chicago has more murders than any other city in the United States — more than New York and Los Angeles combined — but white people are nearly as safe here as in Europe. Through late September, more than 550 people in Chicago have been homicide victims this year. Of those, more than 400 were black, about 90 were Latino and fewer than 30 were “white/other,” even though we’re the most numerous ethnic category in the city and the surrounding area. (Fewer than 10 victims were categorized as being of “unknown” ethnicity.) The black murder rate last year was 46 per 100,000, higher than it was a decade ago. The white murder rate, which has declined, was 2.7. That means blacks are 17 times more likely to be murdered than whites.

Posted in Blacks, BLM, Crime | Comments Off on WP Writer: ‘I never worry I’ll be shot in Chicago. After all, I’m white.’

The Comeback Of Sextin’ Joe

Washington Post: Everyone in Richmond knows about Joe and Myrna Morrissey, as do many across Virginia and as far away as Europe, having feasted on a gush of salacious stories three years ago about the then-55-year-old state lawmaker who went to jail for cavorting with his 17-year-old receptionist.

That he is white and she is black only added another level of intrigue to the saga.

Myrna Warren is now Morrissey’s 20-year-old wife — the couple married in June — and she has become a centerpiece of his unlikely quest to become Richmond’s next mayor, a seat once held by no less than Sen. Tim Kaine, the Democrats’ vice-presidential nominee.

At a time when American politics is dominated by two presidential candidates with mountains of personal baggage, Morrissey, now 59, is starring on his own stage with enough proverbial Samsonite to fill a fleet of cargo planes…

The city’s ever-genteel establishment blanches at the prospect that Richmond’s next leader could be a man whose “Fightin’ Joe” nickname became “Sextin’ Joe” after prosecutors accused him of texting nude photos of the underage Warren to a friend and boasting about having sex with her.

richmond__16381474659310

In professional circles, among blacks and whites, Morrissey is nothing less than an embarrassment, his cringe-worthy moments including the photo he once distributed of himself and Warren and their newborn son dressed in antebellum costumes seemingly out of “Gone With the Wind.”

In addition to his 6-month-old daughter and 18-month-old son with Myrna, Morrissey is the father of three more children with three different women, none of whom he married. His oldest child is 29.

Posted in America | Comments Off on The Comeback Of Sextin’ Joe

One Reason Hillary Hates Trump

From the Chateau: Policy disagreements rarely inspire the kind of primal hate that revulsion on a deep psychological level inspires. Thecunt’s hate for Trump — and it is a real hate — issues from the latter. Reader Ironpusher provides the relevant context:

The following was published on Politico several months ago by journalist Tucker Carlson…….

About 15 years ago, I said something nasty on CNN about Donald Trump’s hair. I can’t now remember the context, assuming there was one. In any case, Trump saw it and left a message the next day.

“It’s true you have better hair than I do,” Trump said matter-of-factly. “But I get more pussy than you do.” Click.

It’s really gratifying knowing that these Trump anecdotes, all of them personifying the ZFG charming jerkboy facet of Trump’s personality, must drive thecunt into a frenzy of impotent feminist grandma rage.

And why does it drive grandma into a rage? Because it reminds her of her cheating husband Bill, and the very very public humiliations she had to endure “standing by his side” that were necessary to sustain her future political ambitions.

Trump is basically the younger Bill Clinton’s sexual thrasher id unleashed, but now to the cheers of an approving crowd. He is thecunt’s public humiliation all over again. Perhaps her eyes will chameleon-like swivel in two opposing directions tonight on live TV in front of 100 million viewers. I pray for it.

Posted in Hillary Clinton | Comments Off on One Reason Hillary Hates Trump