Steve Sailer: Washington Post Supports Howard U. Coeds Being Enraged at Skinny Blonde Beckys Wearing MAGA Hats on Their Safe Space Turf

This disturbance became public with a tweet from a black woman who spells her name in Hebrew.

Isn’t snatching and removing someone’s hat a crime? Isn’t it a form of assault? How would black women feel if someone came over and forcibly confiscated their weave?

Nidhi Prakash and two other journos write for Buzzfeed:

Two teenagers stirred up controversy at Howard University — a historically black college, or HBCU — on Saturday when they arrived at the campus wearing Make America Great Again paraphernalia, drawing a sharp response from the college’s students and prompting a Twitter thread from the university.

The high school students said Howard students approached them and criticized their Trump gear as they waited in line at the cafeteria — with one Howard student grabbing their hats and another saying “Fuck y’all.”

…The two white students, from Union City High School in Pennsylvania, told BuzzFeed News they were among a group of 30 teenagers on an organized trip to see sites in Washington, DC, where the college is based. They arrived at the campus around lunchtime, and headed for the cafeteria with their school chaperones.

Allie Vandee, 16, was one of the students wearing a MAGA hat and a Trump T-shirt. She complained about the incident on Twitter soon after leaving campus.

“We were not even through the front door to get through the cafeteria, and a man, a black man, walked, had walked through and took my friend Sarah’s hat right off her head,” Vandee said in a phone interview with BuzzFeed News.

I wonder if Nidhi Prakash has a dog in this fight?

Steve Sailer writes:

A tweet three days ago from a female student at historically black Howard University:

Screenshot 2017-08-22 20.15.46

And from the Washington Post today, a thinkpiece by a WaPo staffer:

The teenagers who wore MAGA hats to Howard aren’t martyrs for free speech
By Molly Roberts August 22 at 1:42 PM

Two teenage girls who wore “Make America Great Again” hats to Howard University last weekend are making a play to become the latest countrywide crusaders for free speech. Good luck with that.

The Pennsylvania high school students, who stopped by the historically black university for a bite to eat during a school trip to Washington, strolled into Howard’s campus dining hall Saturday decked out in pro-presidential apparel they had purchased the day before. It did not go over well.

“We were not even through the front door to get through the cafeteria, and a man, a black man, walked … through and took my friend Sarah’s hat right off her head,” one told Buzzfeed on Monday. Another man, she said, cursed at her. …

The Twitter account for Howard’s dining hall was more forthright: “We will take any action necessary to ensure that HU students feel safe& comfortable in our dining spaces. The group is no longer on campus.” …

As stifling to debate as the “safe space” argument can be at schools across the country, Howard is one of the few examples of the term at its purest and most persuasive. “Safety” as many students today use the word has little to do with physical harm and more to do with emotional discomfort. Safety at Howard, from its founding, has meant, well, safety.

… It was about the history of an institution that has always been a place where black students could say what they believed without fear of racist reprisal. On Saturday, that’s exactly what they did.

As many Howard students have already asked about their young visitors, what else did they expect?

Is this brouhaha really about the insensitivity of wearing Trump hats? Or is it about the insensitivity of wearing blonde hair that’s about 8 times longer than their shorts on the black coeds’ home turf?

For the term “Becky” see here.

Commenter Alec Leamas explains:

Some people are just Extra-Citizens with superior rights. Such as the right to snatch a hat from your head because they don’t like what it says.

Look Steve, our country has a long and sad history of white teenage girls killing black men in broad daylight. You need to get #woke.

And what does Molly Roberts look like? Like Becky with good hair:

Here are some definitions of Beckie and Becky on Urban Dictionary:

* beckie is probably the hottest name in the whole world. perfect for a hottie with gorgeous eyes. beckie’s have it all: looks, brains, boobs, you name it. a beckie will never let you down
MAN! She’s definately a ‘beckie.’
#wow#hot#fit#gorgy#rawr

* hot white girls, or snobbish women
look at them beckys over there.
#beckies#beckys#white girls#dem girls#white hoes

* The name of the best girlfriend a guy could wish for. Kind, pretty, good looking and absolutely amazing. If you have a girlfriend like this, then you are extremely lucky.
Guy 1: You going out with that becky girl?
Guy 2: Yeah
Guy 1: You lucky bastard…
#becky#amazing#pretty#sexy#cute

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Wait a minute, who was subject to racist reprisal? Oh well, at least four gorgeous White girls got vaccinated for jungle fever just before college.

* It wasn’t the MAGA hats and had nothing to do with Trump! All the black women on Twitter were outraged because these white girls (the ebonics term is “Beckies”) were getting a lot of attention from the black men. To paraphrase the great Colin Flaherty, “Don’t Make the Black Girls Angry!”

* For “yt’s,” there aren’t just sundown towns, there are plenty of places where one isn’t welcome any time of the day. I’ve had it several times, who else has been on the receiving end of assertive demands of “white boy go back to where you came from”?

They can be lucky they were girls. Had it been fellas who had tried to invade their safe space, the response might have been a little more assertive…

* I thought that Howard was founded to showcase black intellectual achievement in the nation’s capital as a rebuke to racial essentialists, with a student body especially burdened by the need to espouse beliefs concordant with reality in order to avoid racist reprisal against their fellow blacks in places not surrounded by the safety of the Federal government.

But thanks for blacksplaining reality to me. I guess Howard exists so black people can believe whatever the hell they want and have a “safe space” where they can physically intimidate anyone who might challenge those beliefs in any way.

* Those girls need a good rogering from a well endowed Black Man. They were trying to start something. I guarantee you they will be mothers of Children of Color in 5 years. I hope they are blackballed from employment until they apologize for their racism.

* Back in med school we had a lawyer come in and teach us about torts. He has us read a famous case in which a black man who was participating in (I think) a sales meeting at a hotel had a plate of food in his hands and a hotel employee snatched it from him.

The employee was successfully sued for assault (and possibly battery) even though he made no physical contact with the man. The violent snatching of something from someone’s hands was ruled assault.

* In his latest Podcast No. 93 with guest Douglas Murray (The Strange Death of Europe), the Jewish public intellectual Sam Harris said he had no idea what was meant by “The Jews will not replace us.” Evidently he wasn’t curious enough to google it.

* Surely the police for Howard University or Washington are issuing a statement any day about their arrest of the male Negro who assaulted (and what he did is, incontrovertibly, assault) these teenagers (possibly minors?) – or are the police in Washington recruiting officers from Rotherham now as part of an exchange programme?

Another point, though: where is Hell were the father, brother, or other male chaperone of these young ladies, and why in God’s name did he permit them to enter a cafeteria teeming with Negros unaccompanied. What vapid fools are they themselves to not know better?

Instinctively, I want to protect females of my race (its biochemically programmed into us all); intellectually, of course, I realise there is no stopping a determined suicide.

* Sailer for the most part seems to me to be taking a fairly distanced “wait-and-see” stance on Trump as President, which is smart given how unpredictable Trump is. On the current trajectory Trump is doing for HBD and immigration controls what Hitler did for eugenics or the Confederacy did for slavery. Historically extremists defending moderately extreme positions don’t usually succeed in making those positions more socially acceptable, they just make things much, much worse. Scott Adams is looking increasingly insane, don’t want to end up like that guy.

All these attempts to push the Overton window to the right seem to be backfiring badly and empowering even more lefty craziness. And the lefties do have the demographics and a lot of corporate clout behind them. The same way it took conservative Republicans to reach out to China (Nixon) or reach out to the Soviets (Reagan), it will probably require a moderate Democrat, ideally Asian, to speak sense on racial issues. But it may be too late.

Posted in Blacks | Comments Off on Steve Sailer: Washington Post Supports Howard U. Coeds Being Enraged at Skinny Blonde Beckys Wearing MAGA Hats on Their Safe Space Turf

Tolstoy on National Characteristics

From War and Peace (13) Volume III

From this one brief encounter with Pfuel, Prince Andrei, owing to his memories of Austerlitz, formed a clear notion of the man’s character for himself. Pfuel was one of those hopelessly, permanently, painfully self-assured men as only Germans can be, and precisely because only Germans can be self-assured on the basis of abstract idea – science, that is, and imaginary knowledge of the perfect truth. A Frenchman is self-assured because he considers himself personally, in mind as well as body, irresistibly enchanting for men as well as women. An Englishman is self-assured on the grounds that he is a citizen of the best-organized state in the world, and therefore, as an Englishman, he always knows what he must do, and knows that everything he does as an Englishman is unquestionably good. An Italian is self-assured because he is excitable and easily forgets himself and others. A Russian is self-assured precisely because he does not know anything and does not want to know anything, because he does not believe it possible to know anything fully. A German is self-assured worst of all, and most firmly of all, and most disgustingly of all, because he imagines that he knows the truth, science, which he has invented himself, but which for him is the absolute truth. Such, obviously was Pfuel. (p. 639)

So where does the Jew fall in this type of accounting? He is most like the German, it seems to me. He knows the truth, the absolute truth.

Posted in Nationalism | Comments Off on Tolstoy on National Characteristics

Good Idea To Lower Standards For Passing California Bar In The Name Of Diversity?

Ben Kurtz writes:

I recently saw a message from the California bar to its attorney members concerning the passing score standard for the bar exam. The goodthinkers in that state have been very concerned that the pass rate (that is, the fraction of test-takers who actually pass) has been going down substantially in recent years. Accordingly, they want to lower the standards for admission to the profession.

As lawyers say, res ipsa loquitur, so I’ll simply reproduce large sections of the message below:

Dear California Attorneys:

As you are probably aware, the bar exam pass rates in California have experienced a continuing trend of decline in recent years. In response to this decline, the State Bar initiated a series of studies to evaluate the bar exam, including its pass line (also known as cut score) and content of the exam. … [T]wo options were presented to the Committee of Bar Examiners for consideration and subsequently issued for comment: 1) keep the current cut score of 1440; 2) reduce it to 1414 as an interim cut score, pending the conclusion of the other studies being conducted.

If a cut score of 1414 were applied to the July 2016 bar exam, the pass rate would have increased from 43 to 47 percent. If the option of reducing the cut score to 1414 were adopted, it could also be applied to the July 2017 bar exam. The study findings and recommendations have been published to solicit public comment until August 25…

In addition to the public comment period that is currently underway, we are seeking additional feedback through this survey… In addition to your views about the cut score and other policy considerations, we are also seeking demographic and other background information to provide appropriate context for your responses. …

The referenced lawyer’s survey, by the way, reads as follows:

Standard Setting Study Regarding Bar Exam Cut Score
1. Select the option below that best represents your view about the cut score for the California bar exam:
Keep the current cut score of 1440
Lower the cut score to 1414
Lower the cut score further below the recommended option of 1414
Other:
2. The following statements are often considered relevant factors in determining an appropriate bar exam cut score. Please rate the importance you assign to each of the statements from 1 (not important at all) to 10 (very important).
a. Declining bar exam pass rates in California
b. The burden of student loan debt for law-school graduates unable to find gainful employment after failing the bar exam
c. The fact that the cut score in California is the second highest in the nation
d. Increasing diversity of attorneys from different backgrounds
e. Increasing access to legal services for underserved populations
f. Maintaining the integrity of the profession
g. Protecting the interest of the public from potentially unqualified attorneys

Please tell us a little bit about yourself.

3. What year were you admitted to the Bar?
4. Select the type of law school that you graduated from
5. How many times did you take the California bar exam before you passed?
Once
Twice
Three or More Times
6. Which of the following best describes your current employment status?
Solo Practice
Small to Medium Firm (<100 Attorneys) Large Firm (>=100 Attorneys)
Nonprofit
Government
Corporate In-house
Retired
Other
7. What is your gender identity?
Male
Female
Other
8. What is your race/ethnicity identity? (Select all that apply.)
American Indian or Alaska Native
Asian
Black or African American
Hispanic or Latino
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
White
Some other race
9. Select the county where you are currently employed (or where you were employed prior to retirement).

No doubt, those intrepid bar association investigators will find that preserving integrity and competency — what I had always thought law licensing was for — is a strong preference of Evil White Men, and therefore the last thing that the bar association of a progressive state of California should seek to uphold.

After all, those two values were literally the last two items on the list of considerations, sitting after — of course — the all-important, nearly religious value of “increasing diversity of attorneys from different backgrounds.”

Remember: Diversity is our strength. That’s why we have to lower our standards.

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* Unsurprisingly, the data are fairly well modeled with black performance being 1 SD below white performance (predicted black pass rate: 25%) and Hispanics being 0.5 SDs below whites (predicted Hispanic pass rate: 44%).

* Law schools are having trouble recruiting, so have lowered admissions standards to stay open. That, in turn means they grant diplomas to many more people who have trouble passing the bar, which in turn threatens their marketing and their accreditation.

They should have trouble recruiting. The ratio of working practitioners to professional school graduation cohorts is variable but clusters these days around 22.5. That for the legal profession is 15. Its difficult to find a profession of any size where that ratio is lower. (That ratio for divinity schools and seminaries is quite low – around 3.5 – but it’s quite normal among divinity students to have no intention of seeking out a position as a f/t clergyman).

The problem, really, is the bloat in law schools. What needs to happen to law faculties is what happened to Chrysler between 1979 and 1985: about 1/3 of the workforce needs to be cut. And, no, people with comfortable bourgeois jobs with a certain amount of cachet don’t want that to happen.

* Here’s a perspective from a Los Angeles judge on lowering the pass score (tl; dr: his experience is that the standards are already too low):

The California Bar already made the decision starting last month to cut the length of the exam by one day (from three days to two).

Part of the issue I think is that law schools have increasingly been accepting and graduating marginal candidates. For a few years at the depth of the recession, there was a glut of law school applications and so schools were marginally more selective (to the extent that they weren’t practicing affirmative action under one name or another). There’s been a sharp crash since, leading to closures (e.g., Whittier Law School), and, presumably, a fall in the caliber of the candidate pool.

One other background event that might be relevant as well is that California’s court system since the recession has been severely affected by budget cuts, leading to bureaucratic lassitude, significant delays in cases getting heard, and widespread adoption of poorly-documented and understood “local local” rules and policies in many counties and courthouses that nobody really knows how to navigate (and that can change from clerk to clerk). There actually are cases “rotting in the courts” as a result. That’s a budgeting and bureaucratic problem, not a problem caused by a shortage of (dumber) lawyers, but it can be blamed on the latter.

* Anybody who thinks we need to lower the bar exam standards should spend a Monday morning in the high grade misdemeanor arraignment hearing just to get a glimpse of how horrible and downright stupid some of these attorneys at the bottom of the barrel really are. Now imagine them with an even lower bar to practice law.

Posted in Affirmative Action, California, Law | Comments Off on Good Idea To Lower Standards For Passing California Bar In The Name Of Diversity?

You Can Only Debate Within The Tribe

Vincent Law writes: “There has to be a common framework of symbols, of shared meanings or past historical experience to rely on. People have to have a shared conception of who/what they are to begin any meaningful debate over the merits of one course of action or another. Furthermore, there has to be a collective feeling that everyone is more or less in the same boat, and is arguing in good faith for the good of the tribe.

How can you have even begin to have a debate with a foreign tribe? They don’t have your best interests at heart. They have theirs. Your debate immediately transforms into a negotiation..and eventually you’re just haggling over the terms of the Danegeld.”

Posted in Alt Right | Comments Off on You Can Only Debate Within The Tribe

Alt-Right Jew: Charlottesville Was A Wake-Up Call

Alt Right Jew Joshua Seidel writes:

Even after Charlottesville, I still don’t know what to think of Richard Spencer. It’s Saturday night and I’m watching him compare his movement to Zionism on Israeli TV. He’s wearing a nice shirt and I’m not surprised; the man has fine taste in clothing, especially in vests. I’d challenge anyone to name a public figure who pulls off vests better than Richard Spencer.

As Jewish people, we can make psychic space for the rough anti-Semite, the uneducated man who hates us because he knows no better, the man in ripped jeans and rebel flag shirts. The “nerdy Nazis” with their polos, marching in Charlottesville can also be explained away, categorized, rendered less frightening. But a man who knows his vests? A man with a winning smile? This is an intrusion, a sign that the containment of the anti-Semitic virus has failed, that the good, the educated, the nuanced people of this world can no longer be assumed to be safe. No matter, though. I still tell people Richard is no Jew-hater. It’s impossible for a real anti-Semite to be so objective about Zionism, to go on Israeli TV… and to wear those nice vests.

After Charlottesville, all nuance is lost. I can’t blame my fellow Jews. The video, pictures and stories are awful. Hundreds chanting “Jews will not replace us,” Nazi flags, the synagogue threatened. However Spencer feels about Jews, he will now attract genuine anti-Semites, moreso than before, and more of his events will devolve into this. Is this what he wanted?

We must be honest about Charlottesville. No one was there to help us. The police in Charlottesville refused to watch the synagogue, despite specific threats (they later denied this). Antifa, claiming that they mobilized to “protect the community,” did nothing to protect the Jewish community. Jews in Charlottesville had to rely on hired guns. Where were the “anti-fascists” we hear so much about? Where were the police? It seems we can only rely on ourselves.

Jews still thinking the left has any interest in defending us against Nazis are fools. I’ve warned for quite awhile that the left will start seeing Jews as White, and the hatred and derision they pour upon white people is headed our way. There are countless vigils, teach-ins, Facebook posts from the left about Charlottesville and Nazis; few mention Jews. We feel this in our online spaces. Jews are an afterthought on social justice Twitter, an annoyance on leftist Facebook. Our concerns “get in the way” of the far more important issues for “people of color” — which of course we are not. I try to explain all of this to the Jewish race-warriors: turn our public discourse into race shaming, my peeps, and Jews will pay the price. We will always be the wrong race, under any formulation.

Posted in Alt Right, Jews | Comments Off on Alt-Right Jew: Charlottesville Was A Wake-Up Call

Orthodox Jews Still Back Trump

A left-wing Orthodox Jew writes in the Forward:

The Orthodox Union took two days to put out a statement in response to the weekend’s events. And when they finally got around to it, the statement danced around any mention of the Trump administration itself, calling instead on “ local, state and federal officials” to ensure justice is served. The Rabbinical Council of America mourned “violence and bigotry”, but not our leader’s failure to condemn it. Agudath Israel, the organization that represents America’s ultra-Orthodox community, has been totally silent on Charlottesville. Asked for comment, spokesperson Rabbi Avi Shafran wrote that the fact that the Agudah doesn’t issue official statements about hate crimes should itself be seen as “a function of the tragic frequency of hate crimes in our country.”

Then there are the smaller, politically conservative Orthodox rabbinic coalitions. Both TORA, which found time to welcome the appointment of Ambassador David Friedman, and Coalition for Jewish Values, which “advocates for classical Jewish ideas and standards in matters of American public policy,” ignored the weekend’s events entirely.

All of these groups have weighed in on controversies over the last year – just not this one.

You may not be as shocked as I was. After all, many Orthodox Jews voted for Trump. Still, you’d think the whole point of voting for someone is because you think they will represent you. So when the president you helped elect fails to condemn American Nazis, you would think it would be an obvious time for the Orthodox and right wing leadership to step up and make their voices heard.

Not so, it seems. The very organizations that have previously rushed with heady smiles to applaud administration policies and to pose for photo-ops with the White House’s court Jews are now speechless.

A left-wing Haredi Jew writes:

According to a poll conducted in August 2016 by the AJC Survey of American Jewish Opinion, Orthodox Jews favored Trump at 50% and Clinton at 21%.

Perhaps most tellingly, Borough Park, a largely Hasidic neighborhood, voted for Trump with an overwhelming 69%. In the ultra-Orthodox burgeoning metropolis of Lakewood, New Jersey, Trump won by a margin of 50.1%, one of the ‘reddest’ townships in all of blue state New Jersey.

Posted in Orthodoxy | Comments Off on Orthodox Jews Still Back Trump

Novelist Michael Chabon: All Jews Must Ostracize the President

Chabon’s a good writer but why would anyone look to him for guidance on politics?

If you read the Torah, you’ll see that bitter humor containing massive over-statement and kvetching goes back a long way in Jewish history.

In reaction to the rise of the Nazis, Jews boycotted Germany in the 1930s. Jews declared war on Germany in the 1930s. How did that work out? By contrast, Jews in Palestine worked with the Nazis to get Jews out of Europe and into the future country of Israel.

Supposedly Steve Bannon’s “far-right views” clashed with Ivanka and Jared’s “Jewish faith.” This is nonsense. The sacred texts of Judaism were composed many centuries before there was any left-right political division. Judaism doesn’t have much to say about left-right politics or about how gentiles should organize their countries.

Comments at Steve Sailer:

* As an op-edster he’s kind of embarrassingly on the nose. He’s not a particularly sophisticated intellectual. But his punditry is pretty revealing of how an awful lot of important people feel because, as a gifted novelist, he’s in touch with feelings.

* So, basically, Mr Chabon thinks Donald Trump is going to “get” Jews, which I can only assume means some kind of genocide, and what he himself decides to do is to, basically, kvetch at people and try to guilt-trip people into quitting their jobs.

Not flee the country. Not go into hiding. Not even attempt to just keep a low profile instead of making a huge, public spectacle of himself. Just to kvetch.

I don’t understand these people. Is it one of those things where Jewish people all kind of realize that these statements are full of shit, but it’s just part of their culture to talk that way? If so, how does it work? Don’t they annoy each other when they do that?

* Search and replace “Jew” for “White,” “anti-Semite” for “anti-White,” etc. mutatis mutandis and this ‘open letter’ would be banned on every major social media platform in the country and held up in every organ of the MSM oligarchy as an example of the most vile racism imaginable.

* Virtually all ‘open letters’ are silly things-just stunts by their writers.

In this case the majority of Jews won’t read it and the majority of those who read it aren’t Jews.

* When Chabon first emerged as a writer, he was treated like the greatest thing since sliced bread, and he’s been given ridiculous levels of praise ever since. This annoyed me, but only mildly, because every time I start to get up a head of steam about him, I remember he married Ayelet Waldman. Holy Moses, was that ever a masochistic thing to do.

Waldman has the personality of Courtney Love and the appearence of the Wicked Witch of the West. She’s turning into a sharp-nosed crone these days. She’s written books about how she can’t stand children or raising them (she has 4), written a book about how she’s been treating her menopause with daily LSD, and made remarks about how her darling hubbie gave her venereal disease and cancerous lesions, etc., etc. I have no idea how he can keep from being driven crazy by her.

There have been remarks that Chabon married her as a beard, because back in the 1980s when he first emerged, if you were a gay writer or wrote gay characters, you ended up in the gay lit ghetto, and you wouldn’t sell well enough to support an opulant lifestyle, and Chabon wanted that lifestyle. As a ‘straight’ writer with an occasional gay character, he was safely mainstream and could be bought by the masses. Hence, he needed a beard.

Deep down, I suspect the female Jewish side of Chabon really wanted to be married to a neurotic, cranky, fussy, whiny, dictatorial, hovering, always-obsessed-with-his-spouse Jewish old man, and the closest thing he could find was Ayelet Waldman.

* Is this supposed to be like the Jewish boycott of Germany, pre WWII?

How many people will listen to this guy, and what will the effect be? This is a serious question.

* Well isn’t this ironic. Congress is about to make it illegal to boycott Israel, but Jews make it mandatory to boycott Trump. Hopefully this will prompt a few JQ-averse normies to take a second look at things. The cycle of Jewish overreach is again playing out before our very eyes.

* I will give Benjamin Netanyahu and his son credit for not totally jumping on the Charlottesville outrage bandwagon. Hawkish Zionists with any brains realize that ostentatiously slamming White Nationalism means that Jewish Nationalism—the raison d’être of Israel itself—has no defense.

P.S., Ayelet Waldman guest posting on Ta-Nehisi Coates’s erstwhile blog in 2010: “Last spring the US Census Bureau released figures estimating that the state of Maine is 95.3 percent white. It is, in fact, the whitest state in the country, just edging out Vermont and West Virginia for that dubious distinction.”

* What if Jews were to resign en masse from policy-making positions in the government?! What a tragedy.

* Do you ever wonder if a lot of Jews have some weird case of group PTSD that they can’t deal with and it makes them act, as a group, way off the deep end?

* There seems to be real willful ignorance around this “Jews will not replace us” meme. It’s clear that no one thinks Jewish numbers are large enough to replace anyone. Rather, the argument goes, that Jews are the instigators of policies–unfettered immigration among others–that tend to displace the native-born population.

I assume that this meme is not accurately reported on because to do so would be to raise uncomfortable questions.

* I would pay $99.95 to watch a live hour-long pay-per-view intimate ‘dinner date’ between Silverman and Richard Spencer. No gimmicks, no costumes, just “real talk” and possibly some mirth and humor.

* LSD micro-dosing is a big thing among a lot of people these days. It’s chief attraction is that it lets you brag about being high status enough that you can talk openly about doing drugs every day without fear of being arrested or losing your job.

* @Steve, why don’t you point out that 95% of the comments on Chabon’s article (including mine) are from Jews telling him to pound sand, that he does not represent us, Jews in general, or anybody but NPR?

This is my problem with you on Jews-you notice Jews doing/saying bad things, and not all those Jews (the majority) who disagree with them, privately or publicly. When the Left applies the same treatment to whites, you are justifiably outraged-it’s dishonest.

* Jews have peaked in terms of power and influence and what we are seeing now is the beginning of a process similar to what the WASPs went through two generations ago and there is nothing they will be able to do to stop it. They should be a little more charitable now because as the old proverb says, “be careful who you step on on your way up the ladder of success. You might see them on the way back down.”

Much of the freak out over Bannon is a realization that whites are beginning to in-group and that Jews and other identity groups will have to figure which side they are on in the political realignment that is taking place. Not only is everyone forced to take sides but they now have to do it openly. Bannon has been a stalking horse, particularly for Jews, because he is the face of the new media which threatened the television monopoly. The internet is amorphous and he is the closest person or thing to lash out at so all they can do is try and destroy him. That is one thing television is still good for.

Jews might have a disproportionate amount of money but as we see with political campaigns, all it can do ultimately is buy television commercials. And if those don’t work like with the attacks on Donald Trump, you are up a creek.

Posted in Jews | Comments Off on Novelist Michael Chabon: All Jews Must Ostracize the President

Eugene Robinson: ‘It’s time to talk about Trump’s mental health’

Is Eugene Robinson a mental health professional? No, he’s an affirmative action columnist for the Washington Post. He has no expertise for commenting on mental health.

I’m all for commentary on the president’s mental health but only from people trained to deliver such analyses.

I don’t like it when people use psychology as a weapon. I particularly don’t like it when people untrained in mental health use psychology as a weapon. I had a girlfriend who did that. I didn’t appreciate it. It’s too easy.

There are only two forms of honorable argument – to contest facts and logic.

Posted in America | Comments Off on Eugene Robinson: ‘It’s time to talk about Trump’s mental health’

Werner Von Braun & The Jews

According to the best biography of the rocket scientist, the Jewish Mafia apparently made Werner Von Braun’s Washington years a misery even though the space philosopher never showed any anti-Jewish bigotry and was a major proponent of desegregation (particularly in his long-time home state of Alabama).

From the book Dr Space: The Life of Wernher Von Braun:

The inscription on the downtown monument dedicated that day closes with the words: “Dr. von Braun, whose vision and knowledge made possible the landing of the first man on the Moon by the United States, contributed significantly to the life of this community. He will forever be respected and admired by his local fellow citizens.” In truth, not all his fellow townspeople agreed with those sentiments or with the naming of the civic center for him. More than a few members of the city’s prominent Jewish community, for example, had not forgotten, nor quite forgiven, his past in Nazi Germany. Three decades later, that remained the case…

The story of Wernher von Braun “reminds me of a Greek drama that deals with the fights between the gods,” mused Peter Petroff in June 1999. The Bulgarian-born master engineer and multimillionaire entrepreneur, then in his eighties, added: “Zeus, the big-shot god, gives selected people just enormous capabilities. Then the lesser gods are jealous and throw up all these hindrances.” Petroff, whom von Braun recruited to work at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in the mid-1960s, continued with his analogy: “Zeus created a guy, von Braun, who was way, way above everybody else. The gods gave him too much talent. He was not only a top-notch engineer and physicist, but he was a visionary. On top of that, he could convince anybody of anything.”1 Then, on March 1, 1970, von Braun, at the apogee of the Apollo 11 and 12 Moon-landing triumphs, left his impregnable home base of twenty years and moved north to take on a challenging position at NASA headquarters in Washington. “This was a tragedy,” Petroff observed years afterward. “Little guys, from jealousies or for fun, messed up what [von Braun] was doing, a typical Greek drama. This was tragic.”

…[George] Low, a superb engineer, experienced technocrat, and Austrian-born Jew, soon was appointed acting administrator by Nixon until a permanent choice could be made. That would take more than six months. With Paine gone, von Braun was now on his own at NASA headquarters, caught in the Washington morass. The climate there soon turned arctic….

Whatever friendly feelings and healthy working relationship had existed between the two, a drastic change occurred nevertheless in the treatment accorded von Braun at headquarters—for whatever reasons—after Paine left and Low took over. When the agency’s top officials testified on Capitol Hill, NASA’s erstwhile perennial star witness was not among them. He was required to submit all his other speeches for review and approval, and advised to stick to the script and forgo his trademark ad-libs. Few headquarters officials ever asked his advice or input on decisions. There were no more chatty sessions in the administrator’s office, von Braun’s secretary recalled; he had difficulty even getting an appointment to see Low, whose office was two doors away.4 Clearly, he had become persona non grata. “Wernher and Low had problems,” recalled Jay Foster of von Braun’s planning team. “I don’t know that it was necessarily personal, but I don’t think Low ever forgave Wernher for the Nazi connection.”

…Some von Braun staffers believed that the so-called Jewish Mafia within NASA and the larger space community had applied pressure on Low to drive von Braun out while he had the opportunity.

…One senior German-born member of the old rocket team, who kept a close eye on the Washington machinations from Huntsville, said he believed Low’s ill will toward von Braun sprang much more from “outright jealousy” than from any “ethnic factors.” “For instance, von Braun in the past would always testify at a congressional committee hearing in a full chamber, with only standing room,” the retired rocket expert continued, on condition of anonymity. “When George Low testified, there would be only a few people in the audience, and some of them would fall asleep. It was just jealousy.”

…Paine claimed that Webb wanted to keep von Braun out of Washington: ‘I think Jim had the feeling that, well, the Jewish lobby would shoot him down or something.’”

…board. Fletcher said he realized he was blamed, but that he had not insisted that the rocket pioneer should go. The administrator named the official responsible, although granting he could have “overruled” that individual, as Fletcher put it.

“It was George Low” whom Fletcher identified, the retired Washington staff member revealed a quarter century later, on condition of anonymity. “He was very jealous of Dr. von Braun.” It was also Low whom von Braun had privately identified to his former staffer.

…One day, he looked very weak but his spirit was good. He had his usual twinkle in his eye. I said, ‘Wernher, how’re you doing?’ He said, ‘Well, Ed, I’ve had so many blood transfusions I can say truly that I’m a full-blooded American.’”

…Tom Wolfe, author of The Right Stuff, to declare repeatedly in later years, “Wernher von Braun was the only philosopher NASA ever really had.” When Wolfe appeared on NBC News’ top-rated Today show in the fall of 1998 to discuss his new novel, A Man in Full, and John Glenn’s recent return to space, he did so but then hastened to bring up von Braun: “He was a member of the German Wehrmacht, and he had a Teutonic accent—had everything but a dueling scar on his cheek—and so they couldn’t bring him forward as “NASA’s philosopher.” But he was the philosopher, and he said, “The importance of the space program is not surpassing the Soviets in space. The importance is to build a bridge to the stars, so that when the Sun dies, humanity will not die. The Sun is a star that’s burning up, and when it finally burns up, there will be no Earth … no Mars … no Jupiter.” And he said, “You have to find a way, because humans are the only thinking creatures that we know of in the entire universe, and we have to build a bridge to save this particular species.” I think that’s a grand thought, and it should be the thought that everybody has in supporting the space program.”

…His simple headstone was engraved: WERNHER VON BRAUN, 1912-1977 Psalms: 19:1 The Old Testament citation in stone was of his longtime favorite scriptural passage, a soaring Psalm of David: “The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth His handiwork.”

In 1971, Von Braun wrote:

In the early years of Hitler’s regime in Germany this persecution took many forms but the most obvious was the vilification of the Jewish people in the Nazi press. Most thinking Germans saw this for what it was, creating a necessary scapegoat for the desperate unemployment rate to rally the masses behind the Hitler government. However, most including myself did not believe even in our most violent nightmares that this overt antagonism would ultimately lead to anything like Auschwitz (of which I heard for the first time after the war). Until the outbreak of the war, Jews were welcomed as officers and enlisted men in the German Army, and social contacts were widely maintained with Jewish friends. I confess to no deep psychological thinking on this matter during these times. I thought that when the political objective of the anti-Jewish campaign had been reached a new scapegoat would be found. Stalin’s series of persecutions of the Kulaks, the Army officers (Tuchachevski, et al.), the Trotskiists, the Intelligentsia and the Russian Jews seemed to set a most likely pattern. During these years I was, of course, a young engineer with very little interest in politics, and rather engrossed in my studies on the potential of space flight and my rocket experiments. I felt very fortunate when I gained support for my work in the form of some money and facilities from the German Army. I did not have any more scruples in accepting this support than, say, the Wright Brothers may have had when they signed their first contract with the U.S. War Department. In 1939, when war was declared, our rocket work was directed to producing weapons. Most of my time before and during the war was spent at an experimental rocket station at Peenemuende, a remote spot on the Baltic Coast. Our days were spent in designing, building, and testing. I have often been asked how could I produce weapons of war, and I have read many essays on the moral aspects of this general question, which I guess is as old as war itself and thus as old as mankind. From my own experience, I can only say this: when your country is at war, when friends are dying, when your family is in constant danger, when the bombs are bursting around you and you lose your own home, the concept of a just war becomes very vague and remote and you strive to inflict on the enemy as much or more than you and your relatives and friends have suffered. There was another aspect, too: our knowledge of what was happening in Germany and the world was rather limited by the Nazi propaganda machine. In private discussions with friends, one would occasionally discuss things like the existence of concentration camps, in which all kinds of opponents of the Hitler regime, including Jews, were held. But I do not remember ever having heard of a single incident of an atrocity, let alone of deliberate mass killings of civilians. If you find this hard to believe, you have merely to ask yourself how long after the event it was that you first heard about the massacre at Mylai in Vietnam, and this in a country with a free press eager to unearth unpleasant facts, rather than in one with a rigidly controlled press determined to protect tightly held state secrets and to withhold anything from public purview that Hitler wanted the population not to know about. You ask me why I did not lend my influence to save the Jewish people. First, as I just said, I truly was not aware that atrocities were being committed in Germany against anyone. I knew that many prominent Jewish, Catholic and Protestant leaders had been jailed for their opposition to the government. I also suspected from the fact that I had lost sight of my own Jewish friends, that many Jews had either fled the country or were held in concentration camps. But being jailed and being butchered are two different things. Secondly, while I may have been of some importance to the German Army’s rocket programs, I certainly did not wield any political influence over anyone outside of Peenemuende. I, myself, was arrested by Himmler and needed the influence of my commanding general to save myself. As you know, the extent of the actual suffering and the criminal mass slaughter of the Jewish people became known to the world only many months after the hostilities ended, and it was only then that I learned of these things myself. I was deeply shocked and have ever since been ashamed of having been associated with a regime that was capable of such brutality. And, along with many millions of my former fellow countrymen who learned about these atrocities only after the war was over, I know that our generation must accept our share of the guilt for what happened.

Posted in Germany, Jews, Space | Comments Off on Werner Von Braun & The Jews

British Civil Servant Convicted Of Keeping A Slave

Teresa Abu is a Muslim name.

Daily Mail:

A Government civil servant and her husband kept an African woman at their home in ‘servitude’ with ‘little or no basic freedom’, a judge has concluded.
Rashida Ajayi said she had been a domestic worker at the home of Teresa Abu and husband Joel for a decade.
She said she pocketed just £300 a year for her work and complained of being a victim of ‘labour exploitation’.
Mrs Abu, a civil servant involved in policy support at the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, and her husband disputed Ms Ajayi’s claims.

‘The overall picture I have from the evidence is that Ms Ajayi was kept in economic servitude,’ said Master McCloud in a written ruling.
‘Her circumstances in the Abu household were oppressive servitude.’
She said they ‘fell short of the standards which the law of the land requires as a basic minimum for the dignity of the worker and their remuneration’.
Ms Ajayi said she had been a ‘domestic worker’ at the Abus’ home between 2005 and 2015 after being brought from Nigeria.
She said she had been subjected to ‘minimally paid domestic servitude’ and had ‘little or no personal freedom’.

Posted in Slavery | Comments Off on British Civil Servant Convicted Of Keeping A Slave